Magma Fincorp open offer from April 8

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Magma Fincorp’s open offer will start on April 8 and close on April 26, it said in a regulatory filing on Wednesday.

“Submission of the detailed public statement regarding the open offer for acquisition of up to 19.88 crore fully paid up equity shares of face value of ₹2 each, representing 26 per cent of the expanded voting share capital of Magma Fincorp by Rising Sun Holdings Private Limited together with Sanjay Chamria and Mayank Poddar,” said the filing.

Axis Capital has been appointed as the manager to the open offer.

On Februrary 10, the two companies had announced that Adar Poonawalla controlled Rising Sun Holdings will take a 60 per cent stake in Magma Fincorp by subscribing to a preferential issue for ₹3,456 crore, triggering an open offer for 26 per cent.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IndusInd Bank promoters complete capital raise

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


lnduslnd International Holdings Ltd (IIHL), the promoter company of lnduslnd Bank, said it has completed its capital-raise through a rights issue, which was oversubscribed.

“IIHL raised capital at an overwhelming premium of 1,400 per cent towards the subscription of this rights issue,” it said in a statement. This reiterates the confidence of IIHL’s global shareholders in the decision of IIHL and its subsidiary, IndusInd Limited, to redeem the balance of 75 per cent of the warrants at the price of ₹1,709 per share, amounting to ₹2,021.45 crore, the statement added.

Further, to support the redemption of warrants, IIHL has decided to monetise some of the other mature, non-core investments.

The funds from this divestment and the rights issue will be remitted on or before February 18, it said.

Previously in July 2019, 25 per cent of the warrants were subscribed on payment of ₹ 673.8 crore.

“This would lead to IIHL shoring up additional equity of 1.7 per cent in lnduslnd Bank, thereby bringing promoter equity to 15 per cent on a diluted basis,” it said.

The Board of IIHL has always been desirous of increasing its stake in lnduslnd Bank to 26 per cent, the statement further said.

“Towards this, it has raised the debt by pledging some shareholding of lnduslnd Bank for acquisition or strategic investment to convert IIHL into a listed operating entity outside India by the first week of September 2021,” it said.

Meanwhile, according to a regulatory filing on February 16, the promoters of IndusInd Bank have pledged 4.27 crore shares, amounting to 5.6 per cent stake, with Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Bank, promoter United India Insurance settle non-disclosure case with Sebi, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Bank has paid Rs 41.4 lakh to Sebi to settle its case of non-disclosure of information relating to offloading of the bank’s shares by its promoter United India Insurance Company(UIIC).

The non-life insurer also paid Rs 10.1 lakh to the regulator to settle the same case.

Sebi said it noted in the investigation that during the period from October 01, 2017 to September 30, 2018, the value of trades by UICC in the securities of the private lender on each trading day was more than Rs 10 lakh.

Under Sebi rules, Axis Bank was required to disclose the same to the stock exchange within two trading days of the receipt of the disclosure from UIIC.

“However, the same was disclosed by the applicant (Axis Bank) to the stock exchange only on October 16, 2020, only with a delay of 1072 – 1080 days,” Sebi said in its order on Tuesday.

The regulator said in five instances the disclosures made by UIIC to Axis Bank was with a delay of 10-17 days. It was required to disclose the same within two working days.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks’ bad loan provisioning falls for fourth consecutive quarter in Q3, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


ET Intelligence Group: The aggregate bad loan provisioning by banks fell sequentially for the fourth consecutive quarter in December though some of them increased COVID related provisioning. For a sample of 28 banks, provisioning for bad loans or nonperforming assets (NPA) fell by 27.5% sequentially to Rs 24,149.7 crore in the December quarter. It was the lowest in the seven quarters under observation.

The loan loss provisioning by banks has been benign in the current fiscal year so far on account of various schemes launched by the central bank to reduce the impact of the pandemic. “Bank NPAs this year would tend to be a bit nebulous given the various forbearance dispensations that have been made besides the restructuring schemes that have been introduced,” noted CARE Ratings in a report.

A majority of the sample banks, 19 to be precise, reported lower NPA provisioning compared with the previous quarter. Among them were public sector banks (PSBs) including State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Union Bank, Indian Bank and Canara Bank and their private sector counterparts such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and IndusInd Bank. These banks recorded a double digit sequential drop in NPA provisions for the December quarter. Banks including Kotak Bank, Axis Bank, and Yes Bank showed a sequential jump in bad loan provisioning.

The sample’s COVID-19 provisioning increased by 22.7% sequentially to Rs 14,291.1 crore in the December quarter led by a higher provisioning by SBI, HDFC Bank, and ICICI Bank. The sample’s net interest income fell marginally by 1.4% to Rs 1.3 lakh crore.

According to the CARE Ratings report, the gross NPAs of the banking system fell to Rs 7.4 lakh crore in the December quarter from Rs 7.9 lakh crore in the previous quarter while the NPA ratio fell to 7% from 7.7% by similar comparison.

Banks’ bad loan provisioning falls for fourth consecutive quarter in Q3
The banking, finance and insurance (BFSI) sector reported a gradual recovery in credit offtake amid buoyant festive demand in the December quarter. “The BFSI sector saw robust operational delivery, especially in the large-cap banks, with above 70% provisioning coverage ratio and minimal restructuring in the loan books,” said Gautam Duggad, rresearch head, Motilal Oswal Institutional Equities.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICICI Bank to buy stakes in two fintech companies for Rs 6.03 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


ICICI Bank on Tuesday said it will buy stakes in two fintech companies — CityCash and Thillais Analytical Solutions — for a total cash consideration of Rs 6.03 crore.

CityCash is a bus transit-focused payments technology company which provides ticketing system technology to state transport corporations.

Thillais Analytical Solutions operates a neo-banking platform Vanghee, which facilitates connected banking solutions for corporates and MSMEs, and helps banks deepen their customer relationships.

As per two separate deals entered by the bank on Tuesday, ICICI Bank will buy 5.40 per cent stake in CityCash for Rs 4.93 crore (Rs 49.34 million) and 9.65 per cent in Thillais Analytical Solutions Pvt Ltd for Rs 1.1 crore (Rs 11 million).

Both the deals are expected to be completed by the end of March 2021, ICICI Bank said in separate filings to stock exchanges.

Post investment, ICICI Bank will hold 5.40 per cent shareholding in Tap Smart Data Information Services Pvt Ltd (CityCash) through acquisition of 5,492 equity shares. The 9.65 per cent stake in Thillais Analytical Solutions will be through acquisition of 10 equity shares and 100 CCPS (Compulsory Convertible Preference Shares).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Budget plan to privatise two PSBs: Centre may have to tweak the ‘nationalisation’ laws

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Centre may have to amend at least two banking laws to take forward its Budget announcement of privatisation of two public sector lenders.

While the Centre is yet to decide on the two public sector banks it will privatise in 2021-22, multiple sources said it is clear that the government will have to bring changes to what are popularly known as bank nationalisation laws — the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980.

Although the Finance Minister had said the legislative changes will happen in the ongoing Budget session itself, indications are that the amendments will be brought only in the monsoon session of Parliament given the crowded legislative agenda for the second part of the Budget session beginning March 8 and ending on April 8.

It may be recalled that Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had in her recent Budget speech said: “Other than IDBI Bank, we propose to take up the privatisation of two public sector banks and one general insurance company in the year 2021-22.”

Financial Services Secretary Debasish Panda had recently said that any of the 12 public sector banks could qualify for privatisation. He had said the names would be decided based on a three-committee-level process involving the NITI Aayog, the Core Group of Secretaries and the alternative mechanism for final approval.

Panda expressed confidence that banks that are now under the RBI’s prompt corrective action (PCA) framework would come out of it by March and be considered for privatisation.

‘Nil info’ on banks to be privatised

Meanwhile, the NITI Aayog, in a response (seen by BusinessLine) to a Right to Information (RTI) request (made on February 2), said (on February 15) that it had “nil information” on the banks that are to be privatised per the Budget proposal. Also, the government think-tank made it clear that its recommendations on Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) do not include any public sector bank. This was in response to a query on what the recommendations of the NITI Aayog are for privatisation of public sector banks and which two banks have been recommended for privatisation.

To another question, the NITI Aayog made it clear that the Cabinet has not yet approved any specific policy on privatisation of public sector banks. Any policy matter with respect to public sector banks is dealt by the Department of Financial Services, it said.

In her recent Budget speech, the Finance Minister had said that she was asking the NITI Aayog to work out the next list of central public sector entities that would be taken up for strategic disinvestment.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFC stressed assets may hit Rs 1.5-1.8 lakh crore by fiscal-end, says Crisil

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Nevertheless, gold loans and home loans have been resilient, with the least impact among segments.

By the end of the current financial year, rating agency Crisil expects stressed assets of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) to touch Rs 1.5-1.8 lakh crore or 6-7.5% of the assets under management (AUM). However, reported gross non-performing assets would be limited due to the one-time Covid-19 restructuring window and the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) recast scheme offered by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Unlike previous crises, the pandemic has impacted almost all NBFC asset segments.

Operations of most of these lenders were curbed the most in the April-June quarter, when disbursements and collections were severely affected by the complete standstill in economic activity. Krishnan Sitaraman-senior director, Crisil Ratings, said, “This fiscal has bought unprecedented challenges to the fore for NBFCs. Collection efficiencies, after deteriorating sharply, have now improved, but are still not at pre-pandemic levels.” There is a marked increase in overdue amounts across certain segments and players, he added. Nevertheless, gold loans and home loans have been resilient, with the least impact among segments.

The past experience of handling asset quality will come to the rescue of NBFCs. For instance, many NBFCs have reoriented their collection infrastructure and are using technology more centrally, which has improved their collection efficiencies. Since the lockdown was lifted in phases, collection efficiency has improved, but is still some distance away from pre-pandemic levels in the MSME, unsecured and wholesale segments, given the volatility in underlying borrower cash flows. Stressed assets in the unsecured loans can be in the range of 9.5 to 10% by the end of FY21. Similarly, stressed assets in the real estate finance can shoot up to 15-20% by March end.

The big challenge this year will be the unsecured personal loans segment, where underlying stress has increased significantly with early-bucket delinquencies more than doubling for many NBFCs. For vehicle finance, however, Crisil expects the impact to be transitory, and collection efficiencies to continue improving over the next few quarters as economic activity improves. Unlike previous crises, the current challenges on account of Covid-19 impacted almost all NBFC asset segments. However, the restructuring schemes offered by the RBI will limit the reported gross non-performing assets (GNPAs), Crisil said.

Rahul Malik-associate director, Crisil Ratings, said, “How NBFCs approach restructuring will differ by asset class and segment.” While the traditional ones such as home loans have seen sub-1% restructuring, for unsecured loans it is substantially higher at 6-8% on an average, and for vehicle loans it is 3-5%, he added.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NPA Watch: Banks wrote off loans worth over Rs 25,500 crore in Q3

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India (SBI) wrote off loans worth Rs 9,986 crore during Q3FY21.

A clutch of banks have together written off loans worth Rs 25,539 crore in the December quarter, even as an interim judicial stay on the recognition of bad loans after August 31 kept slippages in check. Data for 18 banks compiled by FE showed that write-offs remain a key tool for banks to reduce the amount of non-performing assets (NPAs) on their books at a time when the process and timelines for settlement and recovery have become elongated.

Banks typically make two categories of write-offs. A technical write-off is made when the bank removes an account from the NPA category even as it continues to make efforts to recover the amount involved. The other kind is when the bank takes the loan off its books altogether while providing fully for it.

The amount above includes both categories of write-offs for the 18 banks, with the exception of Punjab National Bank (PNB), where the value of technical write-offs could not be ascertained.

State Bank of India (SBI) wrote off loans worth Rs 9,986 crore during Q3FY21. Chairman Dinesh Khara said there were also other methods the bank has been using to reduce its stock of bad loans. “We are encouraging people to enter into compromises also. Options are available even outside IBC. We are exploiting all those options,” he said.

Wherever opportunity exists, the bank is trying to promote mergers and acquisition (M&A) activity as well. So we are trying out all possible ways to see that our stressed book should get resolved,” he added.

Union Bank of India made total write-offs worth Rs 5,850 crore for the quarter. Rajkiran Rai G, MD and CEO, Union Bank, told analysts the write-offs were largely technical in nature. The bank expects a recovery of about Rs 5,000 crore from written-off accounts in FY22. “We have not encashed much during this period because of Covid. So we could not go aggressive. Even in the resolutions or one-time settlements what we have done, we could not get the recoveries,” Rai said, adding, “So now maybe in the last quarter we will see some recoveries and maybe next year will be a good year on this, given the one-time settlements we have sanctioned.”

Axis Bank, which made write-offs to the tune of Rs 4,242 crore, said it has a rule-based policy for writing off loans, which was followed during Q3 as well. Chief financial officer Puneet Sharma said, “There is limited to no judgment involved in our write-off stance…the write-offs in the current quarter based on the rule engine is predominantly coming from the wholesale book.”

Banks provide for an account based on the amount of time an asset has stayed delinquent. There are categories defined by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for this — substandard (an account which stayed in the NPA category for up to 12 months), doubtful (if it has remained NPA for two years) and loss asset (one where loss has been identified by the bank or internal or external auditors or the RBI inspection but the amount has not been written off wholly).

Banks typically write off a loan when it has been fully provided for, which must happen when the loan has remained in the doubtful category for more than three years (or NPA for four years). Generally, it is a doubtful asset that gets written off and in order to do that, the bank must have made 100% provisions. The loan goes off the book altogether and ceases to get reflected in the NPA pile. The banks continue to make recovery efforts and whatever recovery is made flows into the ‘other income’ segment. Most often, this takes the form of a provision writeback.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank completes core banking integration

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Customers of erstwhile Allahabad Bank have been migrated to IndOASIS , the mobile banking App of Indian Bank, and they can avail mobile banking services with their existing credentials.

Chennai-based public sector lender Indian Bank on Tuesday announced the successful integration of its consolidated core banking solution (CBS) platform, following the merger of Allahabad Bank into Indian Bank, effective April 1, 2020.

The CBS and all channels were made available for use by branches and customers on February 15. The integrated CBS is running smoothly across branches and channels. Indian Bank in a statement said that this was a ‘big bang’ merger by the CBS provider, TCS where the data of 3000 plus branches and all channels of erstwhile Allahabad Bank were migrated seamlessly to the Indian Bank database. The customer account numbers of both the banks remain unchanged and the login credentials of internet banking and mobile banking were also retained.

Customers of erstwhile Allahabad Bank have been migrated to IndOASIS, the mobile banking App of Indian Bank, and they can avail mobile banking services with their existing credentials.

Padmaja Chunduru, MD & CEO, Indian Bank, said :“This was the final step in our amalgamation journey ‘Project Sangam’… The support and cooperation from TCS (technology partner) and Deloitte (merger consultant) and the way they worked shoulder to shoulder with our team made this possible.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

FinMin sees I-T, GST implications in the trade in crypto-currencies

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Finance Ministry sees tax implications in crypto-currency trading. However, it is clear that levying a tax does not mean the government is legalising private crypto-currencies.

Minister of State for Finance Anurag Thakur said that a comprehensive Bill on cryptocurrencies will fill all the gaps in the policy space. The government intends introducing the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, in the ongoing session of Parliament.

Another senior Finance Ministry official explained to BusinessLine that the earnings from crypto-currency trade could have income-tax implications, and the commission/fee charged for providing any service to facilitate the deal, a GST component. “Every income is taxable whether it is coming from permissible or impermissible activity… If you are providing any transaction which attracts GST, then the tax has to be paid. When both giver and taker admit that a certain service has been provided and for that some amount has been paid on the basis of a receipt, then the tax has to be levied,” he said.

However, experts feel that taxability could mean legalising the currency, but the official rejected the contention. “Let it be clear that just because income-tax or GST has been charged on the transaction, it does not by itself make the transaction legitimate. Taxability and legality of transactions are independent of each other,” he said.

The government, in its proposed list of Bills to be introduced during the Budget session, listed one “to create a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the RBI. The Bill also seeks to prohibit all private crypto-currencies in India, however, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of crytpto-currency and its uses.”

Thakur said the RBI banned crypto-currencies long time back. Then the Supreme Court ordered the withdrawal of the circular facilitating the transaction of digital currency. Following this, the government formed an inter-ministerial committee to look into the matter of digital currency and it has given a report. A Committee of Secretaries also met under the Chairmanship of the Cabinet Secretary and it has also given its report. Now, the Cabinet is expected to take up the Bill soon.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 469 470 471 472 473 540