DCB Bank gets RBI nod to conduct govt related transactions, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


DCB Bank on Thursday said it has received RBI nod to conduct government related transactions. The Reserve Bank has empanelled DCB Bank as an agency bank to facilitate banking and payment transactions for the central and state governments, it said in a release.

This empanelment follows the announcement by the Finance Ministry in May 2021 lifting the embargo on further allocation of government business to private sector banks.

Through this arrangement, DCB Bank will carry out specific banking services on behalf of both the central and state governments, while continuing to offer SME, micro SME and individual customers the convenience of routine financial transactions through its advanced banking platform, it said.

“DCB Bank’s focus is SME, micro SME, agri and inclusive banking, we look forward to supporting them by providing access to CBDT, CBIC, GST transactions amongst others,” said Praveen Kutty, Head of Retail Banking, DCB Bank.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Large private banks undercut smaller ones in corporate loans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The battle among banks for corporate loans pie is getting fierce even as corporates look at bond markets for cheaper fundraising to refinance existing high-cost loans.

Large private banks are offering aggressively priced refinance loans to lower-rated corporate borrowers of smaller banks.

The rates offered are almost 200 basis points lower than the market rate, which smaller banks are unable to match, according to reports.

With the Reserve Bank of India maintaining an accommodative stance, there is abundant liquidity in the market and rates are at rock bottom. Corporates whose loans are up for refinance are looking to take advantage of the opportunity to cut their interest costs.

PSU banks

PSU banks took are taking a hit.

The domestic corporate loans by the State Bank of India fell 2.23 per cent to Rs 7,90,494 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2021, compared to Rs 8,09,322 crore in the same quarter last year. In the first quarter of FY21, SBI reported 3.41 per cent growth in corporate advances.

Union Bank of India‘s share of industry exposure in domestic advances dropped to 38.12 per cent at Rs 2,40,237 crore from 39.4 per cent at Rs 2,47,986 crore in the same quarter a year ago. Corporate loans dropped 3% at Indian Bank during the last quarter. At PNB, corporate loans fell 0.57 per cent at Rs 3,264,66 crore in June quarter 2021 compared to Rs 3,28,350 crore a year ago. However, HDFC Bank expanded its corporate loans over 10% in the April-June quarter to about Rs 3.15 lakh crore.

Up to May, the gross loans to large industries declined by 1.7 per cent year­-on­year, according to RBI data.

Ceding ground to private-sector rivals

The market share of public sector banks in loans declined to around 59 per cent (of all scheduled commercial banks’ outstanding credit) in December 2020 against around 65 per cent in December 2017.

However, during this period, PvSBs market share rose to around 36 per cent from around 30 per cent, going by Reserve Bank of India data.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What if Future Group heads to bankruptcy court?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Future group lenders are staring at legal proceedings following the SC ruling against its deal with Reliance Retail.

They have more to worry about as $14 million of coupons, falling due later this month, could be a trigger for some debt investors to suggest legal measure against the Future Group if the local retailer fails to meet its financial commitment to bondholders.

Bond investors, who own a minority portion of Future Group’s aggregate debt liability of Rs 21,000 crore, may be more eager than banks to initiate legal proceedings in the event of missed coupon payments after the last week’s Supreme Court order stalled a vital deal with Reliance Retail.

Banks, although unsure about the recovery prospects of the bulk of the Rs 21,000-crore of debt they own, fear that the payout could be lower through the insolvency mechanism.

The group has very little immovable property that can be sold. All its assets are in the form of inventory and receivables that are very difficult to recover. The Reliance-led plan is the best option right now because the recovery will be very low in the bankruptcy courts.

The restructuring

Local and overseas banks — 28 of them led by Bank of India — were counting on Reliance Retail’s takeover of the Future Group for recovery of their dues.

In April, the K V Kamath Committee set up by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) approved a proposal by the lenders to restructure loans to Future Retail and

Future Enterprises, the main units of the Kishore Biyani-led group. Bank of India is the lead lender among the 28 local and overseas financiers that floated the loan recast plan.

According to that deal, Future Group had promised to pay banks Rs 6,900 crore in two tranches by the end of FY22, mainly by selling its small-format stores.

This would allow lenders to convert the short-term loans, non-convertible debentures and overdue working capital loans into term loans, which were to be repaid in two years. The group has not yet identified any buyers for these stores.

Bankers had agreed on the deal as a temporary arrangement on expectations that the Reliance takeover will be completed soon, meaning the lenders would no longer depend upon Future to make the payments.

With this latest court order, all such plans will have to be reconsidered.

The group firms

Future Retail is the largest debtor in the group, with about Rs 10,000 crore of dues. Two other listed companies — Future Enterprises that holds its supply chain, and Future Lifestyle Fashions that houses apparel brands such as Central and Brand Factory — add another Rs 11,000 crore to the debt pile.

Lenders had agreed to an interest moratorium between March 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021. They had also agreed upon waiving all penal interest and charges, default premiums and processing fees unpaid since March 2020 to the date of the implementation of the Reliance Retail takeover.

There is some respite in the central bank’s extension of the timeframe for meeting the financial parameters for companies undergoing restructuring.

What CARE said

Future Enterprise’s liquidity profile has been severely impacted on account of lockdown measures and weakened credit profile of its key customer, Future Retail, CARE Ratings had said in April this year.

“The inability of FEL to realise its debtors during the pandemic and shut down operations during Q1 of FY21 led to a cash crunch, increase in debtor days and subsequently default on its debt service obligations. There have been substantial delays in receipt from group entities and subsequent receipts have not been significant,” CARE had said in April.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ATM companies wary of RBI’s Rs 10,000 cash-out fine, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There is a mixed reaction to the move by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to penalise banks Rs 10,000 for each instance of an ATM being out of cash for 10 hours. ATM operators (known in the industry as managed service providers, or MSPs) and cash-in-transit companies are throwing up their hands, stating that they will not bear the penalty.

In a circular to banks this week, the RBI said that they should monitor the availability of cash in ATMs and ensure that there are no cash-outs. The circular said that banks would be fined Rs 10,000 if there is a cash-out at any ATM for more than 10 hours in a month.

“There are certain locations where ATMs run out of cash within hours of being loaded. These machines may not become feasible to operate if there is a penalty every month,” said a senior executive in an MSP firm. There are 2,13,766 ATMs in the country, and most of them are managed by MSPs who appoint cash-in-transit companies to replenish the currency notes in the machines.

According to MSPs, the regulations are well-intentioned as they recognise the role of cash in the economy and put the onus on banks to ensure cash availability. However, they say that the penalty is not well thought out because banks outsource most of the work and treat the regulations as something to be passed through to the MSPs.

“While the intent behind this RBI circular is welcome, penalty approach alone is unlikely to resolve the issue of ATM currency outage. In fact, it is quite likely that this penalty will become a pass-through, from banks to MSPs, and from MSPs to cash logistics agencies,” said Rituraj Sinha, group managing director at SIS, the largest security and cash-in-transit company in India.

According to Sinha, what needs to be addressed is the root causes of ATMs running dry, such as sub-optimal cash forecasting and delays in availability of ATM-fit currency.

“On-ground implementation of the RBI circular dated April 2018 is the real solution, not just before better security but also more accurate cash forecasting and on-time availability of currency to enable cash logistics agencies to upload ATMs on time and with an adequate amount of currency,” he said.

The 2018 circular requires banks to put in place stringent measures such as transporting cash in cassettes, in prescribed vehicles sticking to government norms on the transport of currency during specified hours of the day.

According to banks, it is difficult to implement all these norms under present cost structures.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI Governor and Jayant Sinha to discuss IBC and various issues, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After five years of its operation, the most famous tool of lenders, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) will see more amendments. The parliamentary standing committee on finance has recommended many changes in the IBC, including strengthening the NCLT bench, obeying the stipulated time frame, liquidation process, extending the pre-pack to large corporations etc. The committee is also going to meet the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India very soon.

“There’s something very important on our radar, the Governor of the RBI is coming to meet with the committee to discuss RBI’s role and how RBI has been handling its various important responsibilities,” said Jayant Sinha, former union minister, and the chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee told ETCFO.

Sinha has been leading the standing committee on issues around Indian Bankruptcy Code (IBC). They have submitted their recommendations to the government in the report titled ‘Implementation of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Pitfalls and Solutions’ in August 2021.

With regards to the subject of IBC, the committee has been meeting various stakeholders like the finance ministry, as well as homebuyers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Global banks unwind lucrative India trades after RBI warning, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Foreign banks have been forced to unwind billions of dollars worth of profitable currency trades at the behest of India’s central bank, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The issue in focus is a flurry of currency swap trades that involved the banks converting rupee-denominated deposits into dollars that were then used to buy foreign sovereign debt including US Treasuries, which are unlisted in India. The Reserve Bank of India warned the banks of a regulatory breach last week, saying they must limit their holdings of such unlisted securities to no more than 10% of investments classified as the non-statutory liquidity ratio portfolio.

Some lenders had racked up exposures of more than $1 billion each by using a regulatory loophole created in February to convert rupee deposits into dollars using a buy-sell swap — buying the greenback now while selling the same amount at a specified date in the future. They then used the proceeds to purchase US government debt and profited from the arbitrage, paying around 3.5% on the local currency deposits and earning 4.9% on the 12-month yield on the currency pair.

As the biggest buyer of the greenback in the forwards market, the RBI was effectively funding some of the trading profits.

The central bank, as part of its intervention strategy, had been offsetting its dollar purchases in the spot market, by entering into sell-buy swaps in the forwards markets. That had swelled its forwards book to over long $70 billion, causing dollar/rupee forward premiums to spike and foreign banks to book arbitrage gains from the trade earlier this year.

Indian entities were net buyers of almost $3 billion worth of Treasuries over April and May, according to US government data, the first inflows from the South Asian nation since October.

The biggest beneficiaries of the swap trades have been overseas lenders in India, which have easy access to large dollar investments, the people said. An email to the RBI was unanswered.

The banks are in the process of unwinding the trade, the people said. They are selling Treasuries and conducting sell-buy swaps — selling the greenback and agreeing to buy at a later date specified in the contract.

The impact of the unwinding was visible in the forward dollar-rupee rates. The implied 12-month yields rose 7 basis points on Friday and Monday after the order and is currently trading at 4.34%.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ATM companies wary of RBI’s Rs 10,000 cash-out fine, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: There is a mixed reaction to the move by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to penalise banks Rs 10,000 for each instance of an ATM being out of cash for 10 hours. ATM operators (known in the industry as managed service providers, or MSPs) and cash-in-transit companies are throwing up their hands, stating that they will not bear the penalty.

In a circular to banks this week, the RBI said that they should monitor the availability of cash in ATMs and ensure that there are no cash-outs. The circular said that banks would be fined Rs 10,000 if there is a cash-out at any ATM for more than 10 hours in a month.

“There are certain locations where ATMs run out of cash within hours of being loaded. These machines may not become feasible to operate if there is a penalty every month,” said a senior executive in an MSP firm. There are 2,13,766 ATMs in the country, and most of them are managed by MSPs who appoint cash-in-transit companies to replenish the currency notes in the machines.

According to MSPs, the regulations are well-intentioned as they recognise the role of cash in the economy and put the onus on banks to ensure cash availability. However, they say that the penalty is not well thought out because banks outsource most of the work and treat the regulations as something to be passed through to the MSPs.

“While the intent behind this RBI circular is welcome, penalty approach alone is unlikely to resolve the issue of ATM currency outage. In fact, it is quite likely that this penalty will become a pass-through, from banks to MSPs, and from MSPs to cash logistics agencies,” said Rituraj Sinha, group managing director at SIS, the largest security and cash-in-transit company in India.

According to Sinha, what needs to be addressed is the root causes of ATMs running dry, such as sub-optimal cash forecasting and delays in availability of ATM-fit currency.

“On-ground implementation of the RBI circular dated April 2018 is the real solution, not just before better security but also more accurate cash forecasting and on-time availability of currency to enable cash logistics agencies to upload ATMs on time and with an adequate amount of currency,” he said.

The 2018 circular requires banks to put in place stringent measures such as transporting cash in cassettes, in prescribed vehicles sticking to government norms on the transport of currency during specified hours of the day.

According to banks, it is difficult to implement all these norms under present cost structures.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Transitory’ inflation reaches tipping point for companies in India, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian companies are running out of room to absorb rising raw material costs, which could force the central bank to unwind stimulus faster-than-expected and threaten a stock market rally that has earned billions for investors.

Companies from the Indian unit of Unilever Plc to Tata Motors Ltd., the owner of the iconic Jaguar Land Rover, are increasingly complaining about pricier inputs and are frustrated at not being able to fully pass on costs to consumers reeling from the pandemic-induced economic shock. But it is only a matter of time before the pass- through happens, warn economists.

“Firms are yet to pass on the increase in underlying input costs due to weak demand,” said Sameer Narang, chief economist at Bank of Baroda in Mumbai. “This will change as growth and consumer confidence revives.”

That recovery in consumer optimism may be just around the corner, according to a survey by the Reserve Bank of India. While households were downbeat about the current economic conditions, they are hopeful about the year ahead prospects, the RBI said.

Any increase in prices could end up fanning inflation further and complicating the central bank’s efforts to support the economy. While Governor Shaktikanta Das has so far maintained that the inflation hump is “transitory,” the RBI this month for the first time since October last year saw consensus elude it on the need to keep interest rates lower for longer to ensure a durable economic recovery.

With inflation already hovering above the RBI’s upper tolerance limit of 6% for the past two months, one of the rate setters, Jayanth Rama Varma, expressed “reservations” about continuing with the accommodative policy stance, Das told reporters Friday. The RBI separately raised its inflation forecast for the fiscal year ending March to 5.7% from 5.1% previously, even as Das underlined the effect of higher global commodity prices, broken supply chains and steep local fuel taxes on price-growth.

Data due Thursday will probably show consumer prices rose 5.7% last month, cooling from near 6.3% in June. Wholesale prices — scheduled for release on Monday — are likely to show factory-gate inflation at double digits for a fourth straight month.

‘Transitory’ inflation reaches tipping point for companies in India
For now, the RBI has kept funding conditions benign, driving a rally in the stock markets. Individual investors by the millions were drawn to stock trading as they chased yields amid inflation and low rates denting returns from traditional sources such as bank deposits. About 14 million first-time electronic trading accounts were opened in the fiscal year ended March 2021, according to India’s market regulator.

For companies too, it’s a fight to protect margins — a crucial ingredient to delivering higher shareholder value. Firms across the manufacturing and services spectrum are grappling with rising input costs for months now, purchasing managers’ surveys show, trying hard to strike a balance between sluggish consumer demand and the need for higher sales and profits.

It is a fight that doesn’t appear to go away in a hurry, especially for manufacturing firms who have had to deal with higher prices of commodities and fuel costs for months on end. For the bulk of the previous financial year, most Indian companies resorted to cost cutting to boost profits, according to a study on corporate performance by the RBI.

“In terms of commodity inflation, I think this is something, which we keep on fighting,” said Girish Wagh, executive director at Tata Motors.

While its a tough balancing act, companies are mindful that something will have to give in eventually. In this case, it could mean higher prices being passed to consumers gradually as a recovery gets stronger in Asia’s third-largest economy.

“If commodity inflation remains, of course, we will have to keep working as we are doing already very hard on our savings agenda, but equally, lead price increases,” said Ritesh Tiwari, chief financial officer at Hindustan Unilever Ltd. These increases will be “required to protect the business model,” he said.

Others aren’t sure if steep price increases are the right way forward. Dabur India Ltd., one of HUL’s competitors, doesn’t favor that route.

“You’re caught between a rock and a hard place,” Dabur’s Chief Executive Officer Mohit Malhotra said, instead opting for calibrated increases. “At one end there is demand, which is not very, very resilient and there is inflation hitting us. So we don’t want to price out ourselves as far as the consumer is concerned.”

While the global debate between whether price pressures are “transitory” or not is still raging, in India, economists are certain that inflation is here to stay. Not surprisingly, bond and swap investors are pricing in chances of a faster-than-expected normalization of monetary policy by the RBI.

“We must differentiate between transitory inflation in developed economies and in India,” said Soumya Kanti Ghosh, chief economic adviser at the State Bank of India.

“Developed economies had not seen inflation at more than 2% even after incessant quantitative easing. In India, inflation is now running close to 6% for the last one year and almost all inflation prints, headline, core, rural and urban are converging at 6% or upwards implying inflation numbers may not be transitory.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Companies don’t want to reveal loan details to public, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Starting August, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) made it mandatory for credit-rating agencies (CRAs) to disclose bank-wise term-loan details of clients or the borrowers for whom ratings were reaffirmed or freshly given.

This mandate was given to the CRAs early this year with the objective to increase disclosures in rating reports. CRAs began implementing this order from the central bank, but sources in the know say India Inc. is resisting such disclosures. “Many companies have expressed their discomfort in divulging bank-wise details of loan exposure and don’t want it to be part of the rating rationale,” says the CEO of a leading CRA.

India Inc. on its part has also approached the central bank to reconsider its stand on such disclosures. Some large conglomerates have written to the RBI asking it to withdraw this requirement. “Information shared with banks and CRAs is highly confidential and is governed by client privilege. Why should such important information be made public?” asks the CFO of a leading cement company.

To put things in context, there are three segments which make up rating documents. Rating rationale captures the score ascribed to the instrument or loan exposure under review and also explains how the score or rating was arrived at. As part of improving transparency, CRAs are required to disclose bank-wise outstanding of the borrower and this is required for fund and non-fund-based exposures as an annexure to the rating rationale.

Whenever there is an increase in credit facility and/or change in composition of term loans, it has to be updated in the annexure. Among the other two documents – rating perspective and rating letter, the former is a paid service which has elaborate details of the client. The rating letter is a confidential communication between the borrower (client) and the CRA and is shared with bankers of the client. This enumerates lender-wise and facility-wise exposure of the borrower.

“For new rating engagements, we have started following this method of reporting. However, in case of legacy clients, some are not comfortable adopting this format of disclosure,” says a senior rating officer of a CRA. On whether such clients should be classified as non-cooperative or not, CRAs say they would first intimate the RBI about such clients. “Technically they are not non-cooperative. They are only resisting certain disclosures being made public,” he adds. “It’s now for RBI to take a call on the matter” says the CFO quoted earlier.

According to highly placed sources, this time around it is unlikely that the RBI would budge on requests from India Inc. Bank-wise public disclosure of loan details in the credit-rating documents was something which was in the works for several years and it has now been implemented. “If the objective is to disseminate as much information as possible, why should the RBI roll back this requirement?” asks the person quoted earlier.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PNB Housing Finance plans to raise Rs 35,000 crore debt as Carlyle deal in abeyance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


PNB Housing Finance is now looking to raise Rs 35,000 crore debt, after facing legal hurdles in the Carlyle group deal, days after SAT gave a split verdict in the matter.

The company will seek shareholders’ nod in its annual general meeting (AGM) on September 3, 2021, PNB Housing Finance said in a regulatory filing.

The company said it will seek shareholders’ approval for further fund raising by way of debt issue.

“Shareholders’ approval is being sought in the 33rd AGM for further fund raising by way of debt issue and the shareholders are being requested to authorise the board of directors to offer, from time to time, the subscription of redeemable, secured/unsecured non-convertible debentures aggregating to Rs 35,000 crore in one or more tranches,” it said in the filing.

On Monday, Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) gave a split verdict in the company’s appeal to the court in the matter related to Rs 4,000 crore equity fund infusion led by its existing investor Carlyle group, and others through preferential allotment of shares and warrants.

Had the deal not stuck into regulatory and legal hurdles, the company would have been successful in raising the equity capital.

The Carlyle deal

The Carlyle-led deal was announced on May 31, in which a clutch of investors including former HDFC Bank MD&CEO Aditya Puri‘s family investment vehicle Salisbury Investments, were to infuse equity capital in PNB Housing. Puri is also a senior advisor for Carlyle in Asia.

However, the deal soon got into a controversy after a proxy advisory firm raised issues and said it would hurt the interest of the minority shareholders as well the promoter. It said the issue price of Rs 390 apiece was too low vis-a-vis the prevailing stock price.

Subsequently, Sebi asked the company to get the valuation of the issue price done from an independent registered valuer, while the company approached the SAT in June, citing it followed the Sebi guidelines on deciding on the price.

The SAT order

SAT in its order, by the two-member bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala and Justice M T Joshi said:”In view of the difference of opinion between the members of the bench “we direct the interim order dated 21st June, 2021 to continue till further order.” Prevalence of interim order means the company can’t disclose the results of the shareholders’ voting that happened on June 22, to know if they cleared the proposal with requisite majority or not.

The company has been looking to raise funds for the past few years. Also, the Reserve Bank of India earlier this year had barred PNB from infusing capital into its subsidiary.

The Carlyle matter is likely to reach the Supreme Court since the tribunal did not provide a clear verdict on the way forward for the deal.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 19 20 21 22 23 55