RBI helps India’s financial condition rebound to better than pre-pandemic level at full speed

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Buying term insurance plan and multi-cap mutual fund schemes will become much simpler than before.

India’s financial condition has staged a full-throttle recovery after the coronavirus disruptions and has rebounded to better than the pre-pandemic level. The Financial Condition Index by Crisil Research showed that India’s financial condition has improved significantly and is at a better position than the pre-pandemic level. The Reserve Bank of India is believed to be the major driver of financial condition;s improvement. In lockstep with central banks elsewhere, measures by the RBI have helped mitigate the large and broad-based economic damage caused by the pandemic, said a report by Crisil. While easy global monetary policies have helped, the RBI’s accommodative stance has helped contain short-run pressures no less, the report added. 

Policy rate, liquidity conditions, markets, foreign exchange, and global conditions were the major drivers of the financial conditions this year. Earlier in October 2020, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das had said that the RBI stands ready to undertake further measures as necessary to assure market participants of access to liquidity and easy financing conditions. 

Since March, the RBI has cut the repo rate by 115 basis points and the reverse repo rate by 155 basis points. It has also purchased ₨ 1.9 lakh crore of G-secs (on a net basis) until September, compared with Rs 0.9 lakh crore in the corresponding period last year. These measures have helped in slashing the interest rates in money and debt markets, and has even got transmitted to bank lending rates to some extent, Crisil added. 

Stress on financial sector 

However, the country’s financial sector still has some major roadblocks. Bank credit growth, which was already weakening before Covid-19, has fallen even further in recent months. Crisil estimated bank credit growth to slow down to a multi-decadal low of 0-1 per cent this fiscal year. Further, high government borrowing and the stress in the corporate bond market are other majors casting shadows of stress on the financial sectors.

Meanwhile, the financial condition in India had been tightening since the IL&FS default in 2018, which triggered a liquidity crisis for non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). The Covid-19 pandemic only magnified this. Consequently, India’s financial condition was the tightest in a decade in April this year, once the lockdown began. 

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PayPal faces Rs 96 lakh penalty for violating India’s anti-money laundering processes, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


American online payment gateway giant PayPal has been imposed a Rs 96 lakh penalty by the FIU for alleged contravention of the anti-money laundering law and accused of “concealing” suspect financial transactions and abetting “disintegration” of India’s financial system.

PayPal, which began India operations in November 2017, said it was fully committed to follow due processes and is “carefully reviewing the matter”.

The company has also been charged with “defeating and frustrating” the tenets of public interest and the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which aims to keep the country’s financial system safe from economic crimes, terrorist financing and black money transactions.

Calling the contraventions as “deliberate and wilful”, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in a scathing 27-page order issued on December 17 held the company guilty on three broad counts, the fundamental being its failure to register itself as a “reporting entity” with the federal agency as mandated under the PMLA.

“…I, in exercise of powers conferred upon me under section 13(2)(d) of the PMLA, 2002 impose a total fine of Rs 96 lakh only on PayPal Payments Private Limited which will be commensurate with the violations committed by it,” the order issued by FIU Director Pankaj Kumar Mishra said.

It said that “there is ample evidence of the willful violation of the law and, therefore, PayPal cannot be let off with a penalty that should normally be imposed for minor violations”.

The order directs the company to pay the fine within 45 days and also register itself as a reporting entity with the FIU, appoint a principal officer and director for communication within a fortnight of the receipt of the order.

An appeal against the order can also be made before the Appellate Tribunal of the PMLA within 1.5 months.

A PayPal spokesperson told that it “is fully committed to regulatory compliance.”

“We take our obligations seriously across 200 markets where our payments platform is present. We are carefully reviewing the matter and we cannot comment further at this point,” he said.

This is for the first time that the FIU, an agency under the Union finance ministry, has undertaken punitive action against an online payment system operating in the country like it has done against public, private and cooperative banks in the past for not following anti-money laundering procedures in keeping their financial channels clean.

As per the order accessed by , the legal tussle between the FIU and PayPal began in March, 2018 when the latter asked the company to register as a reporting entity for keeping “record” of all transactions, reporting suspicious transactions and cross-border wire transfers to the FIU and for identifying beneficiaries of these funds.

The FIU analyses and shares these reports with various intelligence and investigative agencies for further action.

As per the order issued under section 13 of the PMLA, PayPal refused the FIU’s directive and hence a show cause notice was issued to it in September last year.

PayPal defended its action and cited Reserve Bank of India guidelines to state that it only operates as an Online Payment Gateway Service Provider (OPGSP) or a payment intermediary in India and is “not covered within the definition of a payment system operator or financial institution and in turn, not covered under the definition of a reporting entity under the PMLA”.

“Therefore, at this time, payment intermediaries, such as PayPal, are not required to register as such with the FIU-India,” it said in its reply to the agency.

PayPal also stated that it has “submitted” to the RBI its decision to cease domestic payment aggregator business in India before June next year.

The FIU, however, rejected its claims and said PayPal was very much involved in handling of funds in India, is a “finanical institution” and hence qualifies to be a reporting entity under the PMLA.

“The business model offered by PayPal clearly indicated that it not only acts as an intermediary but actively undertakes money transfer operations…

“PayPal undertakes to settle an online transaction by moving money from the customer’s account (issuing bank) to the merchant account, which ultimately transmits funds to the merchant’s bank account (acquiring bank) when the transaction is finalised,” the order said.

It added, “By virtue of enabling payment system for its users by way of credit card, debit card, money transfer operations, PayPal is functioning as a payment system operator and is therefore deemed to be a reporting entity…”

The order said while the company “defies” the process in India, its parent company in the US – PayPal Inc. – reports suspicious transactions to the American FIU and also to similar agencies in Australia and the UK.

Sharing of suspicious transaction reports by PayPal was “crucial” in enabling FIU to share such information with Indian law enforcement agencies and by refusing to register it was “not only concealing suspect financial transactions but is also abetting in the disintegration of India’s financial system” and posing “enhanced risk to the financial system of India”, the order said.

It noted that if PayPal’s contention was accepted, the objective of the anti-money laundering law would be rendered “redundant” and other such entities “will find some reason to technically escape being categorised as one (reporting entity) and frustrate the very purpose and object of the PMLA”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PMC Bank gets 4 EoIs; RBI extends limits till March

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Meanwhile, the regulator has also extended the restrictions placed on PMC by three months till March 31, 2021, until the proposals are studied.

The crisis ridden Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank has received expressions of interest (EoIs) from four suitors, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Friday. The proposals are being examined for viability, feasibility and also to check whether these are in the interest of depositors.

Meanwhile, the regulator has also extended the restrictions placed on PMC by three months till March 31, 2021, until the proposals are studied.

“Accordingly, it is hereby notified for the information of the public that the validity of the aforesaid directive dated September 23, 2019, as modified from time to time, has been extended for a further period from December 23, 2020 to March 31, 2021, subject to review,” RBI said.

On December 4, RBI governor Shaktikanta Das had said the response from potential investors for reconstruction of PMC Bank looked positive. The bank and its management were fully engaged with the investors who had purchased the information memorandum, Das observed.

Last month, the administrator of fraud-hit PMC Bank had invited EoI from potential investors for investment or equity participation in the bank for its reconstruction. The last date for submission of EoI by potential investors was December 15. As per the details of the proposal, the eligible investors could be financial institutions, including banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). The proposal also allowed investment from individuals or group of individuals/companies, societies, trusts or any other such entities having adequate net worth.

In September, 2019, the RBI had superseded the board of PMC bank and placed it under regulatory restrictions after detection of certain financial irregularities. Initially, the RBI had allowed depositors to withdraw Rs 1,000, which was later raised to Rs 1 lakh per account to mitigate their difficulties. In June this year, the RBI had extended the regulatory restrictions on the cooperative bank by another six months till December 22, 2020.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Bank says reports on Srei exposure ‘grossly inaccurate’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In its clarification, Axis Bank said it has complied with its underwriting practices and approval processes for any exposure taken in relation to Srei Equipment Finance and Srei Infrastructure Finance (collectively “Srei entities”).

Private sector lender Axis Bank on Tuesday said the report, issued by an Australia-based news platform, which alleged that the bank has provided loans to Srei entities without any due diligence and verification of end use of the loan amount is “grossly inaccurate and baseless”.

“…the report is grossly inaccurate and baseless in so far as Axis Bank Limited’s outstanding to Srei entities or underwriting practices and processes are concerned. We are evaluating all remedies available to us against the author/publisher of the captioned report,” the bank said in a stock exchange filing, clarifying a press statement, issued by the Scams Breaking on its website breaking@scamsbreaking.com.

The news platform has alleged that, “As per the records maintained by MCA21 (a ministry of corporate affairs website) the Axis Bank etc. have provided loans to Srei Infrastructure and Finance to the tune of Rs 44,000 crore without any due diligence and verification of end use of the loan amount. This loan amount has been disbursed with sham receivables including related party transactions.”

In its clarification, Axis Bank said it has complied with its underwriting practices and approval processes for any exposure taken in relation to Srei Equipment Finance and Srei Infrastructure Finance (collectively “Srei entities”). The bank said its outstanding exposure to Srei group (including Srei entities) as on December 14 stood at Rs 800 crore as against Rs 44,000 crore alleged by Scams Breaking.

On the allegations, Srei said, “It has come to our notice that certain individual/group of individuals acting in collusion have hatched a pre-planned conspiracy whereby they have been circulating false, fictitious and imaginary content, by twisting facts and figures, through images, videos and article on the internet in a concerted manner through their website and on various other social media platforms with a view to cause wrongful loss in terms of reputation and business in the eyes of investors, creditors and public at large.”

“We have filed a police complaint, alerted authorities in cyber cell department and are pursuing legal recourse against the individuals/group engaged in this criminal conspiracy of intentionally distorting facts for pecuniary gains,” it added.

Notably, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has appointed an auditor to conduct a special audit of Srei Infrastructure Finance and its subsidiary Srei Equipment Finance(SEFL). In a stock exchange last month, Srei Infrastructure Finance, had said, “We would like to inform you that a special audit of the company and its subsidiary, Srei Equipment Finance Limited is being undertaken by an auditor appointed by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in exercise of its powers under Section 45 MA(3) of the RBI Act, 1934.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 53 54 55