BoM Q1 net profit soars 106% to ₹208 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank of Maharashtra’s (BoM) standalone net profit soared 106 per cent year-on-year (y-o-y) to ₹208 crore in the first quarter ended June 30, 2021, on the back of a healthy growth in net interest income and total non-interest income. The Pune-headquartered public sector bank had reported a net profit of ₹101 crore in the year ago period.

However, BoM restructured higher quantum of advances, mainly in the retail and corporate segments, even as its asset quality, in terms of non-performing asset (NPA) ratios, showed improvement in the reporting quarter.

Net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was up 29 per cent y-o-y to ₹1,406 crore (₹1,088 crore in the year ago quarter).

Total non-interest income, comprising fee-based income, trading income and other income, jumped 87 per cent y-o-y to ₹691 crore (₹369 crore).

Net interest margin (NII/ total assets) rose to 3.05 per cent in the reporting quarter from 2.43 per cent in the year ago quarter.

All-round improvement

AS Rajeev, MD & CEO, observed that there was an all-round improvement in BoM’s performance parameters despite the first two months of the quarter witnessing localised lockdowns across the country due to the second wave of the Covid pandemic. The bank will continue to maintain net interest margin (NIM) above 3 per cent, bring down gross NPAs and net NPAs below 6 per cent and 2 per cent, respectively in FY22, he added. The bank expects credit growth to continue at 14-15 per cent.

BoM restructured advances aggregating ₹2,240 crore (₹1,048 crore in the fourth quarter/Q4 of FY21). It restructured retail advances aggregating ₹1,013 crore; corporate (₹793 crore); and MSME (₹434 crore). Under restructuring, there is usually revision in repayment terms relating to the interest or repayment period. Fresh slippages were lower at ₹840 crore (₹2,051 crore in Q4FY21).

Also read: Bank of Maharashtra raises ₹403cr via QIP

Gross NPA position improved to 6.35 per cent of gross advances as at June-end 2021 against 7.23 per cent as at March-end 2021. Net NPAs position too improved to 2.22 per cent of net advances against 2.48 per cent.

Gross advances increased by 14 per cent y-o-y to ₹ 1,10,592 crore on the back of about 16 per cent growth in RAM (retail, agriculture and MSME) advances and about 12 per cent growth in corporate and other advances.

Total deposits were up 14 per cent y-o-y to ₹ 1,74,378 crore, with savings deposit and current deposit growing by 22 per cent and 24 per cent, respectively.

Current account, savings account (CASA) deposits accounted for 53.04 per cent of total deposits against 49.56 per cent in the year ago quarter.

Shares of the Bank closed at ₹23.10 apiece, down 2.33 per cent over the previous close on BSE.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dinanath Dubhashi, L&T Finance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The strength we have built up was a strong balance sheet with good provisioning, said Dinanath Dubhashi, MD & CEO, L&T Finance Holdings. “We had just raised the rights issue, built business strengths, built collection strengths, and built strengths on the liability side and each one of this was tested in quarter one,” he added. Edited excerpts:

Though it has been a tough patch for all, both personally and professionally, you have managed to grow 20% year on year. Let us talk about what has led to this growth.

I would take this to last time I spoke with your channel, and that was at the end of the Q4 results. We had mentioned at that time that a few things that the company is doing is going beyond the profits and quarterly performance. That is to make sure that we build strengths which will help us to do well in the medium-to-long term, but also deal with any short-term problems which come. And the short-term problems came.

So, the strength we have built up was a strong balance sheet with good provisioning. We had just raised the rights issue, built business strengths, built collection strengths, and built strengths on the liability side and each one of this was tested in quarter one. Quarter one was very strange. First 15 days of April were absolutely okay. The second 15 days of April, entire May, and maybe the first 15-20 days of June were very bad in the sense. I mean forget business, people were afraid for their lives and we all know that. Then again, things have started improving towards the end of June and July they have improved even further.

The strengths that we have built have manifested. As you rightly put: profits are up 20%. Now I must also say that we are comparing to last year first quarter, which was also a bad quarter. So, I must be upfront about that. But still, a COVID quarter to COVID quarter 20% growth is a good performance. There are some things which have happened even better. We, even in this climate, in our rural book we have had our best ever first quarter disbursements. Even though for a month, month-and-a-half, everything was closed, we got our best ever first quarter disbursements. Our rural book is actually up by 8%. We have seen some run downs and some procurements in our infra book which has actually taken our retailisation quickly up to around 46%. These are the good things.

Second is cost of liabilities. The liability franchise we have built and cost of liabilities have remained very well in control. In fact, they have remained at the same level as in Q4 and substantially below last year Q1. All this has led to a good growth and before provision stage which has enabled us to take further anticipatory provisions, or what we call macro prudential functions, and make our balance sheet stronger.

Last year what we did was we built our macro prudential provision in the first two quarters and the last two quarters we reversed, which actually helped us. This method of taking early provisions and then using them helped us. We are doing that again. We have taken around 370 crores, but God forbid if a COVID wave three comes and I do not think anybody can predict that we will be ready and that balance is what actually signifies the importance of this quarter’s result. Of course, the icing on the cake is the 20% profit growth.

Why is that your NPAs for the quarter have gone up by nearly 75 bps? If one looks at the provisioning cover, it has changed.
Most definitely, in the COVID quarter the gross NPAs are going up, which is no surprise. I mean, it is a COVID quarter, so that is one thing. But if you observe carefully and compare year on year, the absolute amount of gross GST has actually come down. It is basically because the book has gone down, as I told you, the ratio has gone up. Just to point that out: the overall gross stage three absolute amount has actually come down a little bit, or let us say remained the same year on year. That is the first thing.

It is no surprise and I would not like to defend that that gross stage three will go up in a COVID year or in a COVID quarter, and hence what we need to do. And you never know, that trend may continue. We are hoping that it will reverse, but it may continue. Because of that what is important is we create additional provisions. Now provision coverage on NPA is a function of ECL model. So, it can go 3-4% up and down. But if you count our Rs 1,400 crore of additional provisions, which is there now on the balance sheet on standard assets, that prepares us tremendously for any NPA increase which may happen and that is the point that I am trying to make.

Rather than a quarter on quarter changing NPA in any COVID wave and especially the wave that was where customers were afraid, frankly our people were afraid of going out for a month or so. There were restrictions on movement, so most definitely it will affect. The important point is that we have made anticipatory provisions and are ready to phase any further effect of this that may happen. The positive side is businesses are picking up and rural India is definitely picking up. Most importantly, our people are now more than 90% vaccinated. We did a big campaign and more than 20,000 are now vaccinated and hence more able to travel. I think the medium-term prospects look good.

Given the second COVID wave is receding, can we say that the worst of the impact as far as collections or asset quality go is over?
I will talk both business as well as collections. Business farm, that is tractors, have started recovering very quickly. The important thing is the manufacturer space, there were supply chain problems last year in the first quarter. This year there were no supply chain problems. The manufacturing and the production were happening. So, the question was whether point of sales is open, tractor dealerships are opened, and two-wheeler dealerships are open. The rural dealerships opened earlier and the business started faster. The urban dealerships are just opening and we hope that the business will start from here.

If you talk about micro loans, as collection picks up, then disbursement will also pick up there. Housing definitely, again, lots of registration offices were closed. People were unable to visit sites to go and buy a house. Buyer and seller meetings were a problem. All these kept quarter one at a fairly low level. Slowly, these things are picking up, but the important thing is collections. Actually, the collection efficiencies which we have shown and we have put in the presentation have, other than micro loans, improved between May and June. All the other products – and that is important – and micro loans did not improve in June, but already in the first 15 days of July it has improved and substantially.

I would not be crystal ball gazing and say the worst is over. I think this can be the famous last words going by our COVID two experience. But most definitely, in most products June looked better than May and July is certainly looking better. Now yes, if a COVID wave three comes, who knows. I mean nobody was able to predict wave two, so I do not think anybody will be able to predict wave three. Hence, we should be prepared in all the aspects of the company. But to answer your question in one short sentence, July is definitely looking better than June.

In Q1 L&T achieved NIMs plus fees of 7.52%. What is your outlook for margins in FY22 given the uncertain environment?

Margins is a question of two things: one is interest cost, and I have said that our treasury has done extremely well. Q4 we thought was the lowest ever, and in Q1 we have done at the same level. We have reduced it maybe 1 bps, but that would be very good. The second good thing we have done is actually using this low interest cost regime locked into good medium-to-long term funds. Hence, we believe that even if the host of funds will definitely slowly go up from Q2 onwards, the trajectory will be lower and we will be able to retain our margin.

The second is a mix between retail and wholesale. As we said, at this time our infra business and infra book actually degrow. Infra book degrow and the rural book grew because of that the product mix move towards higher margin products. To answer your question, 7.5 is definitely way above what we guide, but yes, I do not think it should fall way below 7% or anything like that. We always guide between 6.5% to 7%, and we should be able to stay on the higher end of that guidance.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Understanding future of revamped ARCs in India’s future trillion dollar economy, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Asset Reconstruction Companies were established with the role of providing specialized expertise in management and recovery of non-performing assets (NPA). Ideally, this would allow financial institutions to focus more on optimizing lending instead of difficult recoveries. The high number of NPAs on the balance sheet of Indian banks in the last three years is not fresh news. ARCs are important interventionists and crisis managers who can play a major role in the insolvency and turnaround framework of India. But they are presently like the unetched character of a Bollywood potboiler without the proper chance to shine because the script fails them.

A committee has been set up by RBI to undertake a comprehensive review of and recommend the working of ARCs to meet the growing requirements of the financial sector on April 19, 2021, under the chairmanship of Shri Sudarshan Sen, former Executive Director, RBI. The role of ARCs in relation to NPAs needs to be re-thought allowing legroom for a disruptive role. Just like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code led to behavioural change in loan repayments, it is necessary that the market behaviour of banks and ARCs is compulsorily modified for them to think out of the box and allow risk diversification. Some of our recommendations are discussed below.

Objective Valuation of Financial Assets: The price bid by ARCs for NPAs does not reflect the true recoverable value of financial assets generally. Acquisition of assets is known to happen at acutely discounted rates which may not be aligned with the bank’s recoverable value let alone the market value of the financial asset had it not been distressed. There is a need for objective guidelines for the valuation of financial assets and prohibition on acquisitions and sales at overtly discounted values.

Concentration limit on retention of security receipts by banks: After acquiring an NPA, the ARC issues security receipts (SR) redeemable on the resolution of NPA. This mechanism is supposed to create risk spread, allow a diverse class of investors and make NPA a tradeable asset. But 80-90% of the SR are held again by financial institutions. Effectually, NPAs never leave the balance sheet of financial institutions but just re-enter through the backdoor. Financial institutions continue to heavily invest in SR despite substantial disincentives in holding SRs above 50%. It is important to create concentration limits on SR holding of financial institutions creating a compulsion to market SR to a more diverse category of investors.

Separate Regulatory Department and Class of Professionals: Some of the least supervised and audited (regulatory) classes of regulated entities in India include ARCs and credit rating agencies. Although the function of ARCs is distinctly different from banks and NBFCs, they presently come under the same regulatory and supervisory department of RBI which is already understaffed and overworked. It is important to acknowledge ARCs and even NBFC-Factors as a separate class of regulated entities from banks, cooperative banks and NBFCs. The ARC sector also needs specialized professionals to provide thought leadership and out of box thinking on NPA management, asset turnaround, investment banking, and valuation just like insolvency professionals.

Third-party funding of dispute resolution and securitization process: Most of the times banks have to take up litigation or arbitration for enforcement of security interest. Such dispute resolution is part of the NPA resolution process and maybe a high cost for the bank. To allow banks to increase their liquidity when required, ARCs should be allowed to act as third-party funders of the cost of litigation or arbitration in lieu of part or whole of a financial asset as a success fee. This form of funding is already well established in other financially mature jurisdictions like United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the USA.

While revitalizing the ARC industry it is important that enough thought is given to creating mechanisms and processes that allow proper shifting and allocation of risks and responsibilities. Unless the risk of NPA actually does not move out of the balance sheet of banks and there is enough regulatory freedom for ARCs for resolution of stressed assets through innovative and out of box structures, the mechanism for NPA resolution is fraught to be dependent on government rescue which is not feasible in the long run for the economy and the industry.

The blog has been authored by Ajaya Kumar Sahoo, COO, Find friends & Independent Director at PC Financial
Services and Kritika Krishnamurthy, Partner BFSI at AK and Partners

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Profit rises by 20% to Rs 178 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: L&T Finance Holdings on Friday reported 20 per cent rise in net profit at Rs 178 crore for June quarter 2021-22, mainly driven by rural demand for farm equipment. The non-banking financial company had registered Rs 148 crore profit in the year-ago period.

LTFH said COVID-related partial lockdowns in April and May had an impact on few businesses during the quarter under review.

However, with gradual unlock of the economy from June, the disbursements bounced back led by faster pick-up in economic activity across farm equipment finance, two-wheeler finance, consumer loans and infrastructure finance.

Due to slower industry pick-up, the micro loans, housing and real estate business saw moderate uptick in collections and disbursements, it said.

Farm equipment finance witnessed 130 per cent growth at Rs 1,357 crore as against Rs 590 crore in the year-ago period.

Infrastructure finance showed robust disbursement momentum post unlock and continued sell-down with Rs 1,480 crore disbursed in the quarter.

The business continues to see robust performance backed by higher sell-down volumes and refinancing, it added.

The company’s gross non-performing assets (NPAs) rose a tad to 5.75 per cent during the quarter as against 5.24 per cent in the year- ago period. Net NPAs or bad loans rose to 2.07 per cent from 1.71 per cent.

From 2018-19, LTFH started building macro-prudential provisions for any unanticipated future events which held the company in good stead.

Continuing this focus, as a prudent measure LTFH created additional provisions of Rs 369 crore in the quarter under review. With this, it is carrying total additional provisions of Rs 1,403 crore (1.75 per cent of standard book), it said.

These provisions are over and above the expected credit losses on NPA and standard asset provisions.

“Despite severe impact of COVID 2.0, the learnings from COVID 1.0 held us in good stead in managing short-term challenges and helped maximise positive impact on business metrics.

“Our Q1FY22 performance reflects the fact that the company has built a sustainable business model, one which will enable it to grow in the medium to long-term while dealing with any short-term challenges (including impact of COVID 2.0),” LTFH Managing Director & CEO Dinanath Dubhashi said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India’s risk-averse lenders are emerging as one of the biggest hurdles to its recovery, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s risk-averse lenders are emerging as one of the biggest hurdles to the speed of the nation’s recovery from the pandemic-induced downturn, as they hold back credit when the economy needs it the most.

Loans to companies and individuals has been growing at a subdued 5.5%-6% in recent months, which is half the pace seen before the pandemic struck, Reserve Bank of India data shows. The nation’s biggest lender State Bank of India wants to nearly double its credit growth rate to 10% in the year started April 1, but is willing to miss the goal.

“It is a very fragile situation,” Dinesh Khara, chairman of SBI, said after reporting earnings for the fiscal year ended March. The bank would not “compromise” on asset quality to achieve targets, he said.

Khara’s comments underline the biggest obstacle to both credit off-take and economic growth, pegged at 9.5% this year, already reduced from the central bank’s previous forecast of 10.5% and following an unprecedented contraction last year. Banks’ risk aversion — or the fear of soured loans jumping in a tough economic environment — could slow the economy’s recovery further, according to analysts, including those at the RBI.

“Credit is a necessary and probably most important ingredient for economic growth,” according to S. S. Mundra, a former deputy governor of RBI, who estimated that the multiplier effect of credit on nominal gross domestic product growth is 1.6 times.

It doesn’t help India’s case that it’s already home to one of the biggest piles of soured loans among major economies. And add to that a crisis in the shadow banking sector, which culminated in the rescue of two lenders and bankruptcy of two more over the past couple of years.

Corporate willingness for new investments is low, according to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy Pvt., with capital expenditure declining. While companies have posted bumper profits mostly on the back of widespread cost cutting, most have used the extra funds generated to pay down bank loans.

India’s risk-averse lenders are emerging as one of the biggest hurdles to its recovery

According to research from SBI, where economists analyzed the top 15 sectors and a thousand listed companies, more than 1.7 trillion rupees ($22.8 billion) worth of debt was pared last year. Refineries, steel, fertilizers, mining and mineral products as well as textile companies alone reduced debt by more than 1.5 trillion rupees, with the trend continuing this year, the bank’s chief economist Soumya Kanti Ghosh wrote recently.

“Any meaningful recovery beyond a 10% growth in credit demand will require a substantial turn in the private capex cycle, which still seems sometime away as corporates are focused on deleveraging,” said Teresa John, economist at Nirmal Bang Equities Pvt. in Mumbai. She forecasts GDP growth of 7% this year, which is at the lower end of a Bloomberg survey with consensus at 9.2%.

What Bloomberg Economics Says…
“A further slump in credit growth means that the RBI is likely to allow some more time for credit recovery to take shape before its begins to unwind its stimulus measures.”

— Abhishek Gupta, India economist

Consumers too are repairing their finances, which bodes ill for overall demand for goods and services as well as retail loans, and in turn economic growth. The current recovery is likely to be less steep than the bounce that unfolded in late 2020 and early 2021, according to analysts at S&P Global Ratings.

“Households are running down savings,” the S&P analysts wrote. “A desire to rebuild their cash holding may delay spending even as the economy reopens.”

And while Covid-19 relief measures may provide banks some reprieve, the need to raise capital will remain high once virus related stress start to emerge on their balance sheets.

“Indian banks’ challenges posed by the coronavirus pandemic have increased due to a virulent second wave,” Fitch Ratings’ Saswata Guha and Prakash Pandey said this week, as they cut India’s growth forecast by 280 basis points to 10%. That underlines “our belief that renewed restrictions have slowed recovery efforts and left banks with a moderately worse outlook for business and revenue generation.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Goa Min claims facing NPA risk, writes to PM, FM, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Panaji, Goa‘s Ports Minister Michael Lobo on Thursday said that he had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman urging them to provide relief from paying loan EMIs for businesses impacted by the second wave of Covid-19.

A cabinet minister in the BJP-led coalition government led by Chief Minister Pramod Sawant, Lobo is also a hotelier himself.

He told a press conference here, that he was forced to write to the Centre after a bank manager informed the Minister that his own account was in the danger of being declared as a non-performing asset (NPA).

“I am also a businessman. I am getting calls from banks from which I have taken loans. A manager of a bank told me yesterday (Wednesday) that if I do not pay my loan instalment by tomorrow (Thursday), it will be declared NPA.” Lobo said.

“If a bank manager can call me and inform me that my account will be declared as an NPA, what about the common man? What about people who live hand-to-mouth and run small businesses? How will they pay instalments. This is an issue which is plaguing people in Goa as well as the rest of India.” Lobo said.

In his letter to Modi and Sitharaman, Lobo has also urged the top ruling duo to urge the Reserve Bank of India to issue a circular directing all nationalised banks to not declare accounts impacted by the second wave of the Covid pandemic, as NPAs.

“There is a need for a decision on this. The Finance Minister should take a decision and instruct all banks.” Lobo said.

The cabinet minister also said that the central government should also replicate the moratorium on loan EMIs provided to businesses during the first Covid wave last year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DBS Bank India FY’21 net profit surges to ₹312 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


DBS Bank India’s net profit surged by 181 per cent in 2020-21 to ₹312 crore from ₹111 crore in the fiscal year 2019-20.

As of November 27, 2020, Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) was amalgamated with DBS Bank India Ltd (DBIL) and the results include LVB’s performance since that date.

Net revenue for DBIL grew by 85 per cent to ₹2,673 crore in 2020-21 from ₹1,444 crore in 2019-20. The net revenue for last fiscal includes ₹134 crore from LVB.

Total deposits increased by 44 per cent to ₹51,501 crore, which includes ₹18,823 crore from LVB.

Savings account balances grew by about 207 per cent, and current account balances grew by about 98 per cent year on year, including the growth on account of the amalgamation.

NPA

Overall CASA ratio improved to 31 per cent from 19 per cent.

Gross non performing assets (NPA) remained moderate at 1.83 per cent for DBIL excluding the LVB portfolio.

While gross NPA deteriorated to 12.93 per cent after the amalgamation of LVB, the net NPA for the bank on a combined basis, stands at 2.83 per cent given 84 per cent provision coverage.

“After the amalgamation, the bank’s primary focus has been on welcoming the employees and customers of LVB into the DBS family, unifying the LVB and DBS workforces and re-building the LVB business,” DBIL said in a statement.

Platforms integration

The integration of operating platforms and branches is currently underway.

“The steady growth in LVB current and savings account balances as well as in the gold loans portfolio in 2021 is an early indicator of the success of the current strategy,” it further said.

Surojit Shome, Managing Director and CEO, DBIL said there has been considerable progress with the integration of LVB since the amalgamation in November 2020 even with the dislocations due to the second wave of the pandemic.

“While, as expected, there has been an immediate impact on our financial results due to the high Net NPAs and operating losses at LVB, we are confident of realising the long-term prospects of the combined franchise,” he said, adding that in the erstwhile LVB operations, DBIL has already been able to revitalise the gold loans business and grow deposits.

“Our immediate priority is to integrate the operating systems and processes so that we can deliver best-in-class solutions to a wider customer franchise,” he further said.

DBIL’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.13 per cent, with CET1 at 12.34 per cent. During the year, DBS Bank infused ₹2,500 crore into DBIL to support the amalgamation.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI to auction two NPA accounts to recover dues of over Rs 313 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: SBI will auction two non-performing accounts (NPAs) next month to recover dues of over Rs 313 crore, according to a notice by the lender.

The two accounts to be put up for e-auction on August 6 are Bhadreshwar Vidyut Pvt Ltd (BVPL) with a loan outstanding of Rs 262.73 crore and GOL Offshore Ltd with Rs 50.75 crore dues.

“In terms of the bank’s policy on sale on financial assets, in line with the regulatory guidelines, we place these accounts for sale to ARCs/banks/NBFCs/FIs, on the terms and conditions indicated there against,” SBI said in the notice.

The reserve price for the auction of Bhadreshwar Vidyut is set at Rs 100.12 crore and for GOL Offshore at Rs 51 crore.

SBI has asked the interested parties to do the due diligence of these assets with immediate effect, after submitting expressions of interest and executing non-disclosure agreement with the bank.

“We reserve the right not to go ahead with the proposed sale at any stage, without assigning any reason. The decision of the bank in this regard shall be final and binding,” SBI said.

BVPL was set up in 2007 as a special purpose vehicle promoted by OPG group, having substantial experience in power and steel sectors. In April 2019, ICRA moved the long term rating on bank facilities to the tune of Rs 2,062.40 crore to the company to ‘Issuer Not Cooperating’ category.

ICRA said it had been trying to seek information from the company to monitor its performance, but despite repeated requests, the management of the company remained non-cooperative. It had also advised lenders and investors of the company to exercise appropriate caution while using the rating action as it might not adequately reflect the credit risk profile of the company.

The Mumbai based GOL Offshore is engaged in the business of providing services to oil and gas extraction, excluding surveying.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


About 15.9% of loans less than Rs 25 crore to the MSME sector for public sector banks has turned bad as of March 2021, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

This was against an NPA ratio of 13.1% at the end of December 2020 and 18.2% at the end of March 2020. Loans due past zero days and 30 days also rose significantly to 60.7% and 10.6% respectively.

On the other hand private sector lenders recorded NPA ratio of 3.6% at the end of March 2021 against 2% at the end of December 2020 and 4.3% at the end of March. Loans due beyond zero days and 30 days also rose by 89.6% and 3.7% respectively.

As of February 2021, 80% of the MSME borrowers moved into high-risk category as per data released by the regulator.

MSMEs worst hit

The medium, Micro and Small Enterprises are among the worst hit and they face enormous stress in meeting their payment obligations, the Reserve Bank of India said in its latest edition of the Financial Stability Report.

“Despite the restructuring, however, stress in the MSME portfolio of PSBs remains high,” the regulator noted. “While PSBs have actively resorted to restructuring under all the schemes, participation by PVBs was significant only in the COVID-19 restructuring scheme offered in August 2020,” RBI said.

“Given the elevated level of debt of the stressed cohort, the implications of business disruptions following the resurgence of the pandemic could be significant,” the RBI said

The restructuring

Since 2019, weakness in the MSME portfolio of banks and NBFCs has drawn regulatory attention, with the Reserve Bank permitting restructuring of temporarily impaired MSME loans (of size up to Rs 25 crore) under three schemes.

As per data with the RBI, the banking industry together restructured loans worth Rs 36,000 crore under the August 2020 Covid loan restructuring scheme. Public sector banks held the lions share at Rs 24,816 crore while private banks recast MSME loans worth Rs 11,027 crore.

In contrast to this PSBs have been laggards in lending to this sector with aggregate MSME exposure growing at a paltry 0.89% in the last fiscal year ended March 2020. For private lenders this exposure grew 9.23% during the same time.

“Growth in credit to MSMEs during 2020-21 was aided by the ECLGS scheme, with aggregate sanctions at Rs 2.46 lakh crore at the end of February 2021,” RBI noted. “For Public sector banks credit to the sector remained flat and new disbursements turned negative, after adjusting for interest accretion on past loans; private banks on the other hand, showed relatively robust increase in exposure.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI report, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) ratio of banks may rise to 9.8 per cent by March 2022, under a baseline scenario, from 7.48 per cent in March 2021, according to the Financial Stability Report (FSR) released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Under a severe stress scenario, GNPA of banks may increase to 11.22 per cent, the report released on Thursday showed.

“Macro stress tests indicate that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of banks may increase from 7.48 per cent in March 2021 to 9.80 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario,” the report said.

It, however, added that banks have sufficient capital, both at the aggregate and individual level, even under stress.

The FSR released in January this year had said banks’ GNPAs may rise to 13.5 per cent by September 2021, under the baseline scenario, which would be the highest in over 22 years.

The latest report said within the bank groups, public sector banks’ (PSBs’) GNPA ratio of 9.54 per cent in March 2021 edging up to 12.52 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario is an improvement over earlier expectations and indicative of pandemic proofing by regulatory support.

For private sector banks (PVBs) and foreign banks (FBs), the transition of the GNPA ratio from baseline to medium to severe stress is from 5.82 per cent to 6.04 per cent to 6.46 per cent, and from 4.90 per cent to 5.35 per cent to 5.97 per cent, respectively.

Under the baseline and the two stress scenarios, the system level CRAR (capital to risk assets ratio) holds up well, moderating by 30 basis points (bps) between March 2021 and March 2022 under the baseline scenario and by 130 bps and 256 bps, respectively, under the two stress scenarios.

All 46 banks would be able to maintain CRAR well above the regulatory minimum of 9 per cent as of March 2022 even in the worst-case scenario, it said.

The report said the common equity Tier I (CET-1) capital ratio of banks may decline from 12.78 per cent in March 2021 to 12.58 per cent in March 2022, under the baseline scenario.

It would further fall to 11.76 per cent and 10.73 per cent, respectively, under the medium and severe stress scenarios by March 2022.

The report said Covid-19 has increased the risks to financial stability, especially when the unprecedented measures taken to mitigate the pandemic’s destruction are normalised and rolled back.

“Central banks across the world are bracing up to deal with the expected deterioration in asset quality of banks in view of the impairment to loan servicing capacity among individuals and businesses,” the report said.

The initial assessment of major central banks is that while banks’ financial positions have been shored up, there has been no significant rise in non-performing loans (NPLs) and policy support packages helped in maintaining solvency and liquidity.

The economic recovery, however, remains fragmented and overcast with high uncertainty, it said.

The report also highlighted the stress test results of the pandemic by various central banks.

Bank of England (BoE’s) ‘Desktop’ stress test in the interim FSR (May 2020) had projected that under appropriately prudent assumptions, aggregate CET-1 capital ratio of banks would decrease from 14.8 per cent at end-2019 to 11 per cent by the second year of test scenario (2021) and banks would remain well above their minimum regulatory capital requirements.

As per the latest position, the CET-1 capital ratio increased to 15.8 per cent over the course of 2020, the report showed.

The report further said in its June 2020 stress test and additional analysis in the light of Covid-19, the US Fed found that banks generally had strong levels of capital, but considerable economic uncertainty remained.

It projected that under severely adverse scenario, the CET-1 ratio of large banks would decline from an average starting point of 12 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 10.3 per cent in first quarter of 2022.

However, CET-1 ratio for large banks increased to 13 per cent as at end-2020, as per the latest position of stress test of the US Federal Reserve.

Similarly, in its Covid-19 vulnerability analysis results (June 2020) for 86 banks comprising about 80 per cent of total assets in the Euro area, the European Central Bank (ECB) estimated that banks’ aggregate CET-1 ratio would deplete by 1.9 percentage points to 12.6 per cent under the central scenario, and by 5.7 percentage points to 8.8 per cent under the severe scenario by end-2022.

As per the latest position, the CET-1 ratio of Euro area banks on aggregate improved to 15.4 per cent in 2020.

The FSR also conducted the stress tests on banks’ credit concentration — considering top individual borrowers according to their standard exposures.

The test showed that in the extreme scenario of the top three individual borrowers of the banks under consideration failing to repay, no bank will face a situation of fall in CRAR below the regulatory requirement of 9 per cent.

However, 37 banks would experience a decline of more than one percentage point in their CRARs.

Under the extreme scenario of the top three group borrowers in the standard category failing to repay, the worst impacted four banks would have CRARs in the range of 10 to 11 per cent and 39 banks would experience a decline in CRAR of more than one percentage point, the report said.

In the extreme scenario of the top three individual stressed borrowers of these banks failing to repay, a majority of the banks would experience a reduction of 10 to 20 bps only in their CRARs, the report said, adding this will be on account of low level of stressed assets in March 2021.

The report further said despite the pandemic conditions during 2020-21, the GNPA ratio for the non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) sector declined with a more than commensurate fall in the net NPA ratio attesting to higher provisioning, and capital adequacy improved marginally.

The GNPAs of NBFCs stood at 6.4 per cent and net NPAs at 2.7 per cent as of March 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 9 10 11 12 13 18