Financial creditors’ insolvency plea valid even after three years, rules SC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court has ruled that plea by a financial creditor for initiation of insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the adjudicating authority will not get time barred on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account as NPA.

A two-judge bench set aside an order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) by which it had said that application under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) for initiation of insolvency process was time barred.

The bench said, “To sum up, in our considered opinion an application under Section 7 of the IBC would not be barred by limitation, on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account of the Corporate Debtor as NPA, if there were an acknowledgement of the debt by the Corporate Debtor before expiry of the period of limitation of three years, in which case the period of limitation would get extended by a further period of three years”.

It said that the impugned judgement and order of NCLAT is unsustainable in law and facts and allowed the appeal of Dena Bank.

The case

Dena Bank has moved the top court in appeal against December 18, 2019 order of NCLAT setting aside an order of March 21, 2019 passed by NCLT, Bengaluru admitting the application of the bank for initiation of insolvency proceedings against company Kaveri Telecom Infrastructure Limited and its director C Shivakumar Reddy.

By a letter dated December 23, 2011 the Bank had sanctioned term loan and Letter of Credit Cum Buyers’ Credit in favour of the company, with an upper limit of Rs 45 Crores.

The said term loan was to be repaid in 24 quarterly instalments of Rs 187.50 lakhs, which were to commence two years after the date of disbursement, and the entire term loan was to be repaid in eight years, inclusive of the implementation period of one year and the moratorium period.

On September 20, 2013 the corporate debtor defaulted in repayment of its dues to the bank and the loan account of the company was therefore declared Non Performing Asset (NPA) on December 31, 2013

The rationale

The bench said that there is no bar in law to the amendment of pleadings in an application under Section 7 of the IBC, or to the filing of additional documents, apart from those initially filed along with application under the provision of the IBC in Form-1.

“In the absence of any express provision which either prohibits or sets a time limit for filing of additional documents, it cannot be said that the adjudicating authority committed any illegality or error in permitting the appellant bank to file additional documents,” it said.

The top court, however, said that depending on the facts and circumstances of the case, when there is inordinate delay, the adjudicating authority might, at its discretion, decline the request of an applicant to file additional pleadings and/or documents, and proceed to pass a final order.

“In our considered view, the decision of the adjudicating authority to entertain and/or to allow the request of the appellant bank for the filing of additional documents with supporting pleadings, and to consider such documents and pleadings did not call for interference in appeal,” it said.

Fresh cause of action

The top court said that a judgment and/or decree for money in favour of the financial creditor, passed by the DRT, or any other Tribunal or Court, or the issuance of a Certificate of Recovery in favour of the financial creditor, would give rise to a fresh cause of action, to initiate proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, if the dues remain unpaid.

It said that in the instant case the balance sheets and financial statements of the Corporate Debtor for 2016-2017, constitute acknowledgement of liability which extended the limitation by three years, apart from the fact that a Certificate of Recovery was issued in favour of the appellant bank in May 2017.

It said that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru had rightly admitted the application of the bank by its order dated March 21, 2019.

Limitation Act

It said that there is no specific period of limitation prescribed in the Limitation Act, 1963, for an application under the IBC, before the NCLT but an application for which no period of limitation is provided anywhere else in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, is governed by Article 137 of the schedule of the said Act.

“There can be no dispute with the proposition that the period of limitation for making an application under Section 7 or 9 of the IBC is three years from the date of accrual of the right to sue, that is, the date of default,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Financial creditors’ insolvency plea valid even after three years, rules SC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court has ruled that plea by a financial creditor for initiation of insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the adjudicating authority will not get time barred on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account as NPA.

A two-judge bench set aside an order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) by which it had said that application under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) for initiation of insolvency process was time barred.

The bench said, “To sum up, in our considered opinion an application under Section 7 of the IBC would not be barred by limitation, on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account of the Corporate Debtor as NPA, if there were an acknowledgement of the debt by the Corporate Debtor before expiry of the period of limitation of three years, in which case the period of limitation would get extended by a further period of three years”.

It said that the impugned judgement and order of NCLAT is unsustainable in law and facts and allowed the appeal of Dena Bank.

The case

Dena Bank has moved the top court in appeal against December 18, 2019 order of NCLAT setting aside an order of March 21, 2019 passed by NCLT, Bengaluru admitting the application of the bank for initiation of insolvency proceedings against company Kaveri Telecom Infrastructure Limited and its director C Shivakumar Reddy.

By a letter dated December 23, 2011 the Bank had sanctioned term loan and Letter of Credit Cum Buyers’ Credit in favour of the company, with an upper limit of Rs 45 Crores.

The said term loan was to be repaid in 24 quarterly instalments of Rs 187.50 lakhs, which were to commence two years after the date of disbursement, and the entire term loan was to be repaid in eight years, inclusive of the implementation period of one year and the moratorium period.

On September 20, 2013 the corporate debtor defaulted in repayment of its dues to the bank and the loan account of the company was therefore declared Non Performing Asset (NPA) on December 31, 2013

The rationale

The bench said that there is no bar in law to the amendment of pleadings in an application under Section 7 of the IBC, or to the filing of additional documents, apart from those initially filed along with application under the provision of the IBC in Form-1.

“In the absence of any express provision which either prohibits or sets a time limit for filing of additional documents, it cannot be said that the adjudicating authority committed any illegality or error in permitting the appellant bank to file additional documents,” it said.

The top court, however, said that depending on the facts and circumstances of the case, when there is inordinate delay, the adjudicating authority might, at its discretion, decline the request of an applicant to file additional pleadings and/or documents, and proceed to pass a final order.

“In our considered view, the decision of the adjudicating authority to entertain and/or to allow the request of the appellant bank for the filing of additional documents with supporting pleadings, and to consider such documents and pleadings did not call for interference in appeal,” it said.

Fresh cause of action

The top court said that a judgment and/or decree for money in favour of the financial creditor, passed by the DRT, or any other Tribunal or Court, or the issuance of a Certificate of Recovery in favour of the financial creditor, would give rise to a fresh cause of action, to initiate proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, if the dues remain unpaid.

It said that in the instant case the balance sheets and financial statements of the Corporate Debtor for 2016-2017, constitute acknowledgement of liability which extended the limitation by three years, apart from the fact that a Certificate of Recovery was issued in favour of the appellant bank in May 2017.

It said that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru had rightly admitted the application of the bank by its order dated March 21, 2019.

Limitation Act

It said that there is no specific period of limitation prescribed in the Limitation Act, 1963, for an application under the IBC, before the NCLT but an application for which no period of limitation is provided anywhere else in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, is governed by Article 137 of the schedule of the said Act.

“There can be no dispute with the proposition that the period of limitation for making an application under Section 7 or 9 of the IBC is three years from the date of accrual of the right to sue, that is, the date of default,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI’s Q1 profit jumps 55 pc to highest ever at Rs 6,504 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], August 4 (ANI): Government-owned State Bank of India (SBI) on Wednesday reported its highest quarterly net profit of Rs 6,504 crore in the April to June quarter, marking an increase of 55 per cent in the year-ago period.

Operating profit increased by 5 per cent to Rs 18,975 crore in Q1 FY22 from Rs 18,061 crore in Q1FY21. Net interest income increased by 3.7 per cent year-on-year.

On the other hand, non-interest income at Rs11,803 crore grew by 24 per cent, said the country’s largest lender in a statement.

Total deposits grew at 8.82 per cent to reach Rs 37.2 lakh crore in Q1 FY22 from Rs 34.2 lakh crore in Q1 FY21. While current account deposits grew by 11.75 per cent, saving bank deposits grew by 10.55 per cent.

Domestic credit growth stood at 5.64 per cent, mainly driven by retail customers. Home loans, which constitute 23 per cent of the bank’s domestic advances, moved up by 11 per cent.

SBI said net NPA ratio stood at 1.77 per cent, down by 9 basis points. Gross NPA ratio came at 5.32 per cent, down 12 basis points.

The slippage ratio for Q1 FY22 is at 2.47 per cent from 0.6 per cent as at the end of Q1 FY21. Credit cost declined 77 basis points year-on-year to 0.79 per cent.

Cost to income ratio declined from 54.5 per cent in Q4 FY21 to 51.89 per cent in Q1 FY22 but increased by 187 basis points year-on-year, said SBI.

Capital adequacy ratio improved by 26 basis points to 13.66 per cent as on June 2021. Return on assets increased by 15 basis points to 0.57 per cent in Q1 FY22 against 0.42 per cent in Q1 FY21.

Return on equity increased by 357 basis points to 12.12 per cent against 8.55 per cent in the same period.

At 2:15 pm, SBI stock was trading 3.6 per cent higher on NSE India at Rs 462.55 per unit. (ANI)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Overseas Bank profit doubles to Rs 327 cr in Q1, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: State-owned Indian Overseas Bank on Tuesday reported over two-fold jump in its net profit to Rs 327 crore for the quarter ending June as provisions for bad loans declined. The bank had posted a net profit of Rs 121 crore in the year-ago quarter.

Total income during Q1FY22, however, was down at Rs 5,155 crore as against Rs 5,234 crore in Q1FY21, Indian Overseas Bank said in a regulatory filing.

The interest income was down by 5.6 per cent at Rs 4,063 crore during the quarter. The non-interest income rose by 17.2 per cent at Rs 1,092 crore due to increase in other income, the bank said.

The Chennai-headquartered lender said it reduced non-performing assets (NAPs) worth Rs 1,616 crore during the quarter, as against Rs 1,969 crore in June 2020 quarter.

Bank’s gross NPAs (bad loans) fell to 11.48 per cent of the gross advances as of June 30, 2021, against 13.90 per cent in the year-ago period.

In terms of value, the gross NPAs were worth Rs 15,952 crore, down from Rs 18,291 crore. Net NPAs fell to 3.15 per cent (Rs 3,998 crore) from 5.10 per cent (Rs 6,081 crore).

Provisions for bad loans and contingencies for the quarter fell to Rs 868 crore from Rs 969.52 crore a year ago.

“The bank plans to come out of prompt corrective action (PCA) by focussing on recovery, low-cost deposits and less capital consuming advances,” it said.

The provision coverage ratio recorded at 91.56 per cent, it added.

Shares of the bank traded 2.7 per cent down at Rs 23.40 apiece on BSE. PTI KPM MR MR



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IOB’s Q1 net profit jumps nearly three-fold to ₹327 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) continues its profitable growth journey as the Chennai headquartered public sector bank reported a net profit of ₹327 crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 against a net profit of ₹121 crore in the year-ago quarter, helped by higher operating profit and lower provisions.

The bank’s operating profit grew to ₹1,202 crore in June 2021 quarter as against ₹1,094 crore in the year-ago quarter, on account of reduction in interest expenditure and higher non-interest income, according to a statement.

Total income stood at ₹5,155 crore as compared to 5,234 crore. Interest income fell to ₹4,063 crore as against ₹4,302 crore in Q1 of last fiscal, while non-interest income was higher at ₹1,092 crore (₹932 crore).

The turnaround story of Indian Overseas Bank

Provisions and contingencies were lower at ₹868 crore as compared to ₹970 crore.

Gross NPA declined to ₹15,952 crore as of June 2021 quarter when compared with ₹18,291 crore in June 2020 quarter and ₹16,323 crore in March 2021 quarter. Gross NPA ratio fell to 11.48 per cent from 13.90 per cent in the year-ago quarter and 11.69 in the year-ago quarter.

Net NPA ratio stood at 3.15 per cent, down from 5.10 per cent in Q1 of last fiscal and 3.58 per cent in Q4 of FY20. Its provision coverage ratio improved to 91.56 per cent from 87.97 per cent in the June 2020 quarter and 90.34 per cent in March 2021 quarter.

Indian Overseas Bank Q4 profit rises over 2-folds to ₹350 crore

Deposits increased to ₹242,941 crore in Q1 of this fiscal when compared with ₹225,546 crore in the year-ago quarter, while gross advances stood at ₹138,944 crore as compared to ₹131,565 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of India Q1 net profit falls 15 pc to Rs 720 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: Bank of India on Tuesday reported a 14.7 per cent decline in net profit at Rs 720 crore for the June quarter. The bank had posted a net profit of Rs 843.60 crore in the year-ago period. However, the net profit was up sequentially from Rs 250.19 crore recorded in the three months ended March 2021.

In the first quarter of the current fiscal, the lender’s total income was down at Rs 11,698.13 crore. In the year-ago period, it stood at 11,941.52 crore, according to a regulatory filing.

The bank’s gross Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) fell marginally to 13.51 per cent of the gross advances at the end of June this year from 13.91 per cent in the same period a year ago.

Net NPAs or bad loans were down at 3.35 per cent in the latest June quarter compared to 3.58 per cent in the year-ago period. Provisions for bad loans and contingencies for the quarter under review were raised to Rs 1,709.12 crore. The same was at Rs 1,512.07 crore in the same period a year ago.

On a consolidated basis, the bank’s net profit was at Rs 735.37 crore in the 2021 June quarter. It was down by 13 per cent from Rs 845.78 crore in the year-ago period.

Shares of the bank was marginally up at Rs 74.60 apiece in afternoon trade on BSE.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CS Ghosh, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


We are provisioning for net NPA in this quarter also. It has come down and so a very small amount has come. This is a conscious call because we have not written off NPAs in this quarter, says CS Ghosh, MD & CEO, Bandhan Bank.

It has been a kind of mixed performance for Bandhan Bank. While the bank has reported the highest ever quarterly operating profits, NPA stress has also risen. Can you tell us about the quarter?
This quarter was more severe than any other quarter in the pandemic situation. The second wave affected lots of lives and people were more scared about it. That prevented a good number of business owners from properly running their business. It started in the first month of the quarter from central India, Delhi and Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh and it has gradually gone to the north east. Till now, it is happening in the north east.

Secondly, micro credit is nearly 60% of Bandhan Bank’s advanced book. The staff go to customers’ doorsteps to collect instalments. It was not easy to do because of the lockdowns and also because of risk to staff health. The number of cases affected came down in July and lockdowns were also lifted and a couple of rating organisations and the government also declared their GDP growth rate will come to 9-10%. I hope the future turns very good.

The total collection efficiency stood at 86% in Q1. Talk to us about collection efficiency for the overall book and collection efficiency in states like West Bengal and Assam. Are you seeing any improvement versus the last quarter?
There has been improvement in collection efficiency. In March, micro credit collection efficiency was 95%. In April, May, June it was hit in a big way by the Second Covid Wave. For that region, it has come down a little bit.

In case of the micro credit portfolio, in the first quarter our demand was Rs 13,000 crore and we collected nearly Rs 13,000 crore including arrears. That means our customers are paying the instalment. The total collection efficiency including arrear is 98% in micro credit and in case of total bank, it is 101% which shows that after the bad situation in the first quarter, it recovered a lot in this month. I hope next quarter onwards it will improve further.

Has micro finance loan book slowed versus last quarter? Is that a conscious call to slow down the growth as collections and demand may be impacted?
No. There are three factors here; one factor is that in the first quarter of any financial year, demand for credit always comes down. Secondly, there was the impact of Covid 2.0 in first quarter and that also impacted demand. Thirdly, we are disbursing credit conservatively and on a very selected basis.

Credit cost has come down versus the last quarter but it is still pretty high at 4.9. Will operating profits be enough to take care of the provisioning or the credit cost needs?
The provisioning is in two parts. One, it has helped me to increase PCR. The other side, it has helped us to strengthen our balance sheet. We can continue this provision continuously and accordingly the business growth will absorb it.

Gross NPAs stood at 8.2% and the net at 3.3%. At a net-net level, will gross and net NPA for FY22 be higher?
No. We have not written off this quarter. We have a Rs 700 crore account for NPA. If we write off this NPA, it will not be in place. Again, when one calculates the gross NPA percentage, because my advance book size has come down, percentage wise also, it has come down. Otherwise, percentage wise gross NPA has increased by 0.5% from last quarter to this quarter. We are tracking that. We are provisioning for net NPA in this quarter also. It has come down and so a very small amount has come. This is a conscious call because we have not written off NPAs in this quarter.

Overall the loan book has declined by about 8% quarter-on-quarter. What kind of loan growth do you expect this year?
In this type of a situation, the bank will be cautious and very selective. The credit growth will come from the last month of the second quarter before the Puja and Dussehra to the fourth quarter. That has been the case in normal times and even last year. So it depends on whether the Third Covid Wave comes in the Puja season or not.

Over the next one-two years, which segments do you think will lead to growth — microfinance, mortgage or commercial banking?
Microfinance is a very standard model and India is a big country. There is no growth driver needed for that. But we are likely to drive the growth of the housing loan vertical. It accounts for 24% now and in future we would like this segment to account for 30% of the total book.
The second vertical we are focussing on is MSME which caters to less than Rs 5 crore type of MSME. There is a huge market which is secure and we would like to grow it in future. Gold loan is another we would like to grow because like housing loans, it is also secured. These are the three sectors we would like to focus on in future and which we expect to account for 30:30:30 by 2025.

What led to margin improvement during the quarter, at what level do you see margins stabilising going ahead?
I have always predicted that around 8 or 8 plus will be NIM but this quarter, it is a little bit higher compared to the last quarter. That is because of last quarter we have reversed the interest of Rs 500 crore. Otherwise, 8 to 8.4 is what we would like to maintain.

You seem to have sufficient capital, how long will the current capital last considering your growth?
The growth of the bank was a little bit on conservative side last year and this year we expect normal growth. Upto 2025, we do not need the extra capital.

Is the structure of the financial industry changing with competition from fintech players?
The banks are focussing on digital transaction mode for the customers. At Bandhan Bank, in the last quarter, 87% of the transactions happened digitally. 11% of the bank accounts were opened digitally. We are also invested in digital transformation of the bank. We are also focussing on how we can give digital service to the customer.

Won’t you need additional capital to expand in digital space?
We have enough funds and we are already working on that from last year. Whatever is needed, will be invested from our own funds.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Equitas SFB, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


PN Vasudevan, MD & CEO, Equitas SFB, talks about the impact of Covid second wave on collection efficiency. However, he believes that the impact is not going to be long term or structural. Edited excerpts:

It has been a relatively better quarter in a very tough environment and this is on account of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic but NIMs have improved compared with the last quarter and operating profit has also improved. There is some stress can you take us through the performance that you have seen?
Yes, I mean we all know that most of the first quarter was really under lockdown because of the wave-2 and people were not able to go out, customers were not able to open their shops, so it was definitely a lot of stress period during this period. Unlike last year, the level of health impact was much higher even though the time period of the wave was so much shorter but the health impact was higher so people were definitely not to take any risk of going out during that time. So, all that did have its impact on our business and collections.

On top of that, this year RBI had announced restructuring program but they had not announced a moratorium period. In our case most of our borrowers are small business people, who when they open their shop, make money and they repay the loans, when they cannot open their shops there is very little that they actually can do. Last year, because of moratorium they were not moved into NPA, they just went under moratorium but this year, since there was no moratorium they either had to pay or ask for a restructuring or their DPD just keeps moving up so that was the scenario this year. We did see an increase in NPA, we went up from 3.6 to 4.6% and we did see a slippage of about 375 crores which was lower than the previous quarter, but still one of the highest that we have seen in the past but very significantly what we have to see, is the level of upgrades. We had an upgrade of nearly about 150 crores.

Can you give us the sense of what the slippages and the recoveries are going to be over the next couple of quarters, I know it is going to be hard to predict but quite a few of the financiers that we have spoken to have said that stress continues in the segments that you operate in?
So, historically our annual slippages have been in the range of around 3-4%, that has been historically our trend of slippages and recoveries used to be around 2%-2.5%. This year, this first quarter we had a spike in the slippage, but we also had a good strong recovery upgrade also happening. So, going forward into the second and the subsequent quarters of the current financial year, we believe that we are mostly through with our wave-2 impact on the books. We have rescheduled about 900 crores between first quarter and July and we have also indicated that we might have a potential restructuring of another between 500 to 700 crores for the rest of the year.

I think mostly the stressed customers should have been fully supported and taken care of and provided for. So, we do not really expect much of slippages like what we saw in the first quarter, we do not really expect that to continue in the second and the subsequent quarters while the upgrades should keep the momentum going because the quality of NPA is much better than what it has normally traditionally been and so we do expect better upgrades but the slippages should significantly come down going forward.

Want to talk about your book and your approach to growing the book, a lot of companies have taken a very cautious stance in light of the current scenario. What approach are you going to take?
If you look at our client profile, most of them are small business people and practically all of them are first time borrowers in the formal financial sector. We have been dealing with this segment of people now for more than 11 years. So, we understand the segment very well and we have a very strong cash flow based credit assessment program which is running on the ground and so we can take a very nuanced call in terms of the credit decision for this profile of borrowers. We are very comfortable with our customer segment. These stresses that we are seeing are all definitely an event triggered temporary kind of a disruption. We do not see it as a structural or a long term kind of an issue in the market or at the customer profile segment. We should continue to be looking to pursue growth as and when the market opens up and supports our operations on the ground.

So, we are not really going to take a call in terms of cutting back or pulling back for fresh disbursement or anything like that. These customers have proven their track record with us for over 10 years and so that is a very strong indication of the quality of these borrowers. So we will continue to keep looking for opportunities to disburse whenever the market is conducive. In terms of credit growth, I think last year we had a 15% credit growth, this year should probably be slightly better than that.

Your liability franchise has been one of the best compared to the other small finance banks, you have strong deposit momentum as well as your CASA ratio is best at 40%. What has actually led to this strong performance here?
Liability has been silver lining in terms of our performance for the last few quarters not just the last one. It has come about, because of a lot of initiatives which were taken by the team and put in place over the last may be six quarters or so. Offering 7% rate for certain buckets of savings pool is just one of them, it is not the only. You know we have put in multiple channels to reach out to specific set of customers. Our NRI segment is doing really well, we had more last year into our VRM channel, that is virtual relationship manager channels, we are now providing a relationship manager service to a set of depositors at a level–where there have not been services through our RM channel in the other banks.

We are able to do that on cost effective basis through our VRM channel and our map book on the high net worth individuals also has been growing very strongly. So, we have improved and increased our product offerings and range to depositors. Today, our product holding of more than two product per client is in the range of around 70% of our depositors, so there have been multiple efforts done and to top up all of this is our digital foray which we commenced last year in the month of Jan-Feb.

We have launched our Selfe savings account programme, where people can open an account online in a matter of a few minutes and that has been doing well and then we had a tie up with the fintech company also about few months back, adding further momentum to the whole CASA story.

One of the factors that the street has been keenly watching is the merger of Equitas holdings and Equitas Small Finance Bank. Can you take us through what we can expect and how this is going to take place?
So, we have got an approval from RBI that we are to apply for the merger before the end of our five year period. Our five year ends on 4th of September this year, we had a board meeting last week and the board of both the companies have approved the merger with the swap ratio of 226 shares of the bank for every 100 shares of the holding company held by the shareholders of the holding company. So, the applications have been made to the stock exchanges and RBI and we need to get the RBI approval, we need to get the exchanges approval, we also need to get the SEBI approval and once we get all these approvals, then we would have to apply to NCLT and then convene shareholders meeting and shareholders’ approval will be taken and subsequently NCLT will have to approve, so all of these approvals we believe could take about an year’s time. We can bring this entire merger process to your completion by then and the shareholder of the holding company when we went public in 2016, we had made it clear right then also that at the end of five years, the hold co. will seek to merger of the bank because we never intent that the hold co. will do any business of its own and so continue to exist independently. We had always indicated that as our way forward and I think today what we are doing is really a culmination of that process and hopefully we should be able to deliver on the promise that we have made in our 2016 IPO of the hold co.

Can you take us through what is your overall growth strategy over the next three to five years also is there an intent to convert to a universal finance bank?
You know we are eligible to apply as per RBI guidelines, we are eligible to apply for a universal bank licence at the end of five years. As I mentioned, we will be completing five years by 4th of September this year, and post that the board will take a call and subsequent approval by the board, we should be applying to RBI for converting into universal bank. We really do not know exactly what will be the procedure that will be followed, so we are probably the first finance bank which will be seeking conversion into universal bank, so we will have to figure out how the process will work.

We really do not have an idea in terms of how long it will take etc. but be that as it may, as far as the bank is concerned, whether we are a universal bank or small finance bank, I do not see any particular change in our strategy or positioning at all. Our focus on the different profile of borrowers will continue to remain exactly where it is, we have built a very strong strength in funding and in understanding the credit capabilities and collection mechanisms of the low income group, so, our focus will continue to remain on that and we will continue to build on our strength that we have built over the last 10-12 years. Over a three year-five year period, if you look at it we should be continuing to grow at around 20-25% growth, that is something that we should continue to look at going forward on a sustainable basis. Historically, we have seen as high as 35 percent growth. Even if we get the licence of universal bank, I do not think that is going to change the focus of our business.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDFC First Bank reports net loss of ₹630 crore in Q1 on higher provisions

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private sector lender IDFC First Bank reported a standalone net loss of ₹630.04 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal year due to a sharp rise in provisions.

The bank had reported a standalone net profit of ₹93.54 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2020.

Total income grew by 11.4 per cent to ₹4,938.05 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal from ₹4,434.12 crore a year ago.

The bank’s net interest income grew by a robust 25 per cent to ₹2,185 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2021 as against ₹1,744 crore a year ago.

Net interest margin was 5.51 per cent as on June 30, 2021 versus 4.86 per cent a year ago and 5.09 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2020-21. In a statement on Saturday, the bank said this was because the cost of funds further reduced.

Other income surged by 75.1 per cent to ₹848.76 crore from ₹484.85 crore a year ago.

Additional Covid-19 provisions

Provisions shot up by 145.9 per cent to ₹1,878.61 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal as against ₹764.08 crore in the corresponding period a year ago.

“The bank has created additional Covid-19 provisions of ₹350 crore during the quarter taking the total Covid-19 provision pool to ₹725 crore. The bank believes that the full estimated impact of second wave of Covid is now provided for in the books of the bank,” it said.

Noting that there was no moratorium provided to customers during the second wave of the pandemic, it said that there was ageing provisions that were required to be taken as per its conservative provisioning norms.

“The bank believes that these provisions may not reflect actual economic loss but represent a delay in timing of repayments,” it further said.

Based on the recent portfolio quality indicators (latest cheque bounce trends, collection efficiency, vintage analysis), the bank said it expects the provisions to taper off for the rest of the year if there is no third wave of the pandemic.

“Regarding the loss during the quarter, we have made prudent provisions for Covid second wave, and expect provisions to reduce for the rest of the three quarters in the fiscal. We guide for achieving pre – Covid level gross and net NPA, with targeted credit loss of only two per cent on our retail book by the fourth quarter of 2021-22 and onwards, assuming no further lockdowns,” said V Vaidyanathan, Managing Director and CEO, IDFC First Bank.

The bank’s asset quality deteriorated. Gross non performing assets shot up to ₹4,667.12 crore or 4.61 per cent of gross advances as on June 30, 2021 from 4.15 per cent as on March 31, 2021 and 1.99 per cent a year ago.

Net NPAs also rose to 2.32 per cent of net advances from 0.51 per cent as on June 30, 2020.

Standard restructured outstanding portfolio (under the Covid-19 relief package provided by the RBI) in retail loans was 1.81 per cent of the overall retail loan book as of June 30, 2021. Restructuring for the overall portfolio stood at 2.01 per cent of the total funded assets.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDFC First Bank logs Rs 630 crore loss in Q1 on Covid provisioning, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private lender IDFC First Bank on Saturday reported a net loss of Rs 630 crore in the April-June quarter due to provisioning measures for cushioning the impact of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. The bank had posted a net profit of Rs 93.55 crore in the year-ago quarter ended in June 2020 and that of Rs 127.81 crore in the previous quarter ended in March 2021.

“Net loss of Rs 630 crore for Q1FY22 is because of prudent provisions for Covid wave 2.0. Covid provision pool increased from Rs 375 crore to Rs 725 crore during the current quarter on a prudent basis to act as a cushion for Covid impact,” IDFC First Bank said in a release.

The bank expects to collect a reasonable proportion of these dues in due course, it added.

Total income (net of interest expense) grew by 36 per cent year-on-year to Rs 3,034 crore in Q1FY22, driven by the growth in NII and fee income, the bank said. Its total income during Q1FY21 stood at Rs 2,229 crore in June 2020 quarter.

The bank said its net interest margin (NIM) — the difference of interest earned and expended — was the highest ever at 5.51 per cent during the reported quarter. The NIM was 4.86 per cent in year ago quarter.

The net interest income (NII) rose by 25 per cent year-on-year to Rs 2,185 crore.

On the asset front, bank’s gross and net non-performing assets (NPAs) were at 4.61 per cent and 2.32 per cent respectively as of June 30, 2021.

The NPA ratios were up from 1.99 per cent and 0.51 per cent respectively, from year ago period.

“The GNPA and NNPA include impact of 84 bps (basis points, which is one hundredth of a percentage) and 71 bps respectively on account of one Mumbai based infra toll account which slipped during the quarter. The bank expects no material economic loss in this account eventually as this is an operating toll road and is only delayed.”

Bank deposits were up by 36 per cent to Rs 84,893 crore. The retail loan book of the lender increased to Rs 72,766 crore as on June 30, 2021 from Rs 56,043 crore.

The year-on-year growth of the retail loan book was 27 per cent excluding Emergency Credit Guarantee Line loan book of Rs 1,645 crore. However, it declined by 1.2 per cent on a sequential basis. The wholesale loan book fell by 15 per cent to Rs 34,232 crore from Rs 40,275 crore.

Capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.56 per cent with CET-1 (common equity tier-1) ratio at 14.86 per cent. Average liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) was at 166 per cent for Q1FY22.

“Within just two years we have made tremendous progress at the bank. Our CASA (current account savings account) ratio is high at 50.86 per cent despite reducing savings account interest rates by 200 bps recently, which points to the trust customers have in our bank and service levels.

“Because of our low cost CASA, we can now participate in prime home loans business, which is a large business opportunity,” V Vaidyanathan, Managing Director and CEO, IDFC First Bank, said. Regarding the loss during the quarter, he said the bank has made prudent provisions for Covid second wave.

“We expect provisions to reduce for the rest of the three quarters in FY22. We guide for achieving pre-Covid level gross and net NPA, with targeted credit loss of only 2 per cent on our retail book by Q4FY 22 and onwards, assuming no further lockdowns,” he said further.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 7 8 9 10 11 18