Banks, experts pin hopes on bad bank to cut NPA pile, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARC) is likely to help banks cut their bad loan piles.

The bad bank and healthy provisioning buffers against doubtful advances should help India’s banks mitigate the impact of delinquencies and asset quality slippages in the aftermath of the second Covid wave, according to Boston Consultancy Group.

The formation of National Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd will help lenders keep up the momentum of recovery in stressed assets in 2021-22 (Apr-Mar), State Bank of India Chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara said.

Along with the resumption of courts and the roll-out of pre-package for resolution through the insolvency law, this will help banks make judicious use of recovery options, Khara said.

The NARC would help reduce sticky assets exposure to 1.8% – 2.3% of total loans, BCG said.

Asset quality is still a major concern for many Indian banks even as nonperforming assets (NPA), on average, could be contained, the global consultancy firm said.

Asset quality

“The second wave of the coronavirus pandemic poses risk to asset quality even as banks retain healthy provisioning buffers,” it said.

Banks have identified 22 bad loans totaling Rs 89,000 crore to be transferred to the NARC in the initial phase.

The State Bank of India plans to transfer bad loans worth around 200 bln rupees to NARCL.

The report also said that bad loans sold to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) as a proportion of banking system stressed assets increased to about 34% at the end of FY20, up from 25% in FY18, with banks taking a much higher haircut on these sales.

Haircuts on sales to ARCs have risen to 66% in FY20 compared to 62% in the prior financial period, it said.

The bad bank

The bad bank was proposed in the Union Budget for 2021-22.

In the last financial stability report released in January, the central bank said that banks’ gross non-performing assets may rise to 13.5% by September 2021 from 7.5% as of September 2020. In the event of extreme stress, the ratio could rise to 14.8%.

Former Reserve Bank of India deputy governor Rakesh Mohan has also warned that higher stress on assets in the banking system threatens financial stability.

Recoveries through various channels have bounced back to about 16% in FY20 from decadal lows of about 10% in FY16 before the pandemic struck.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

S&P revises rating outlook on ICICI Bank to ‘stable’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


S&P Global Ratings has revised its rating outlook on ICICI Bank to stable from negative.

It has affirmed its ‘BBB-’ long-term and ‘A-3’ short-term issuer credit ratings on the private sector lender as well as its ‘BBB-’ long-term issue rating on the bank’s senior notes.

“We revised the rating outlook to reflect our view that ICICI Bank will maintain strong capital position over the next 24 months. The bank will benefit from the sale of stake in subsidiaries and gradual normalisation of earnings, which should reduce risks associated with its capital position,” S&P Global Ratings said in a statement on Friday.

The agency expects ICICI Bank will maintain a risk-adjusted capital ratio of more than 10 per cent over the next 24 months. “Our expectation factors in 13 per cent to 14 per cent credit growth for the bank, an improvement in earnings, and sale of stake in insurance subsidiaries over the period,” it said.

Stressed loans to peak

The agency however expects ICICI Bank’s stressed loans (non performing loans and restructured loans) to remain high when compared to that of international peers.

It said the bank’s stressed loans may peak at 6 per cent of total loans by March 31, but it would be lower than its estimate of 11-12 per cent for the Indian banking industry.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI to sell two NPA accounts next month to recover dues of Rs 60 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SBI has invited bids for two NPA accounts with outstanding dues of nearly Rs 60 crore. “In terms of the bank’s policy on sale of financial assets, in line with the regulatory guidelines, we place these accounts for sale to ARCs/ banks/ NBFCs/ FIs, on the terms and conditions indicated there against,” SBI said in a sale notice.

The bank has put up for sale the accounts of N S Engineering Projects, with loan outstanding of Rs 36.98 crore, and Chinteshwar Steels Pvt Ltd, which owes Rs 22.72 crore to SBI.

The reserve price for these non-performing assets (NPAs) for the purpose of sale has been fixed at Rs 17.19 crore and Rs 10.50 crore, respectively.

The e-auction for these two accounts will take place on July 7, 2021.

The interested asset reconstruction companies (ARCs)/ banks/ non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) / financial institutions (FIs) can conduct due diligence of these assets with immediate effect, after submitting expression of interest and executing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with the bank, SBI said.

“We reserve the right not to go ahead with the proposed sale at any stage, without assigning any reason. The decision of the bank in this regard shall be final and binding,” it added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NPA: NPAs – Are Lenders Credulous!, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The detritus of over Rs 10 lakh cores NPA has been inviting the ire of the public and pundits. The fact that over 90% of NPAs were contributed by large borrowers has only infuriated and fueled suspicion on the skills and integrity of borrowers, lenders, rating agencies , auditors, government, supervisors and all the stakeholders.

Well one may wonder whether this is appropriate time to discuss about NPAs, when the pandemic is ravaging the lives and livelihoods with such ferocity. Health care is the top of the mind of every citizen and the governments. At the same time financial sector has to play an important role in economic recovery. Livelihoods and businesses need financial oxygen (money) to recover, rehabilitate and resume their lives and businesses.

Reeling under massive burden of NPAs, lenders are naturally risk and loss averse. This behavior only compounds problems for themselves as well the economy. Unless lenders resume their business and grow by at least 15%, no nation can grow and more so in an economy dominated by financial institutions and not debt markets. But it cannot be business as usual in their lending process, operations and decisions.

Smart lenders ask themselves of what has gone wrong and learn lessons and avoid repetition of mistakes in their decisions.

Forensic audit reports, internal reports and RBI’s Asset Quality reviews have brought out fault lines in lending process and operations besides malfeasance. Successful underwriting process revolves around primarily assessment of (3C s) Character, Capital and Capacity of the borrower. If any borrower is short on any or all of the 3C-s, the probability of default (PD) is very high.

Credit underwriting is no rocket science. One may not be faulted in asking — Did the lenders questions wrongly on 3Cs to borrowers while evaluating credit decisions/ Or did the borrowers give wrong answers deliberately or otherwise and this led to faulty assessment of 3C-s ending up in NPA/ Or Are the lenders plain credulous and believed whatever these NPA borrowers had said and did?

3Cs framework looks blindingly obvious but their assessment is tricky. The most difficult is assessing the intent and character of the borrower. This is evident from the fact that banks /auditors have flagged as much as Rs Three-lakh crores as frauds. There are a large number of willful defaulters as well.

Audits and investigations both internal and external have revealed, of course quite late in the day that many of the large borrowers had no adequate capital of their own as a buffer and defense against adverse business developments and faltered badly. Many of these borrowers have round tripped borrowing from one bank as capital in another project of another lender. This elevated leverage led to liquidity and ultimately solvency crisis turning the lending as NPA.

Capacity of the borrowers to run the business successfully is a moving target in this fast moving business landscape/ models and disruptions. Many could not handle expansions and diversification of their businesses. Past experience and credit history does not help most of the time.

It is time that lenders beef up their 3C assessment capabilities lest they repeat the story. Many lenders add more Cs like Collaterals, Covenants and Controls to protect their lending. 3C framework captures the essential risk characteristics and traits of borrowers. This tool may be sharpened by deploying AI and digitization of the entire process.

Even Global Finance Crisis that cost more than a Trillion to global banks is a failure to adhere to 3C-s framework.
Supervisors in turn evaluate lenders on 3 C frameworks besides their own self assessment. Nothing prevents owners and regulators embracing 3 C framework in their own context.

This tool is relevant to other lenders like Mutual funds, Insurance companies, funds etc.

The 3C framework is as old as lending. But it is not atavistic

The blog has been authored by B Sambamurthy a Nominee Director from Reserve Bank of India and an ex Director and CEO of Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT), Hyderabad.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bottomline back in black, IOB wants to be out of PCA, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Chennai, With its bottomline back in black after a long time, the Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) has approached the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) seeking it be taken out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) fold, a top official said.

Managing Director & CEO Partha Pratim Sengupta also said that the IOB plans to raise additional funds of about Rs 2,000 crore from a follow-on equity issue and Rs 1,000 crore by issue of bonds.

Addressing reporters, Sengupta said the bank has approached the RBI to be taken out of PCA as its financial metrics have turned good.

The bank also said it plans to come out of PCA by focusing on loan recovery, low cost deposits and less capital consuming advances.

The bank closed last fiscal with a net profit of Rs 831 crore as against a net loss of about Rs 8,527 crore.

The total income for the year ended March 31, 2021 stood at about Rs 22,525 crore as against about Rs 20,712 crore for FY20.

According to Sengupta, the income from treasury operations had beefed up the bank’s other income and the reduction in cost of funds contributed to the profitability.

In a regulatory filing, the IOB said its Board has approved the issue of 125 crore equity shares at an appropriate premium to the public by way of follow-on public offer/rights issue with or without participation of the government.

The Board also decided that the issue could also be to qualified institutional buyers, employee shareholders, and on preferential basis to insurers and mutual funds.

It also approved the issue of Basel III compliant tier II bonds up to Rs 1,000 crore in one or more tranches on private placement or public issue.

On March 31, 2021, the IOB had received Rs 4,100 crore as capital infusion by the government at an issue price of Rs.16.63 per equity share of Rs.10 each.

During the year under review, IOB’s total business stood at Rs 3,79,885 crore (deposits Rs 2,40,288 crore, advances Rs 1,39,597 crore) up from Rs 3,57,723 crore (deposits Rs 2,22,952 crore, advances Rs 1,34,771 crore).

The bank said it had recovered about Rs 6,831 crore from non-performing assets (NPA) accounts last fiscal.

The bank’s gross NPA (GNPA) reduced from 14.78 per cent as at March 31, 2020 to 11.69 per cent as at March 31, 2021.

The net NPA (NNPA) went down from 5.44 per cent, as at March 31, 2020, to 3.58 per cent as at March 31, 2021.

Sengupta said IOB is targeting GNPA of less than 10 per cent this fiscal.

According to him, the bank has identified about Rs 8,000 crore loan for restructuring and a cash recovery target of about Rs 4,600 crore.

Sengupta also said that the IOB had merged 53 branches last fiscal and one or two branches may be merged this year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PSU banks headed for privatisation may get a major makeover, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government plans to spruce up public sector banks’ balance sheets through capital support and sale of non-core assets and trim their workforce before putting them on block.

It may also look at transferring bad loans of these lenders to the upcoming bad bank.

On the radar

The NITI Aayog, which has been entrusted with the job of identifyng suitable candidates for the privatisation, has recommended names to a high-level panel headed by Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba.

Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Bank of Maharashtra and Bank of India are some of the names that may be considered for privatisation by the Core Group of Secretaries on Disinvestment.

The other members of the high-level panel are Economic Affairs Secretary, Revenue Secretary, Expenditure Secretary, Corporate Affairs Secretary, Secretary Legal Affairs, Secretary Department of Public Enterprises, Secretary Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) and the Secretary of administrative department.

Following clearance from the Core Group of Secretaries, the finalised names will go to the Alternative Mechanism (AM) for its approval and eventually to the Cabinet headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the final nod.

VRS scheme

Two state-owned banks being picked up for privatisation by the government are likely to come out with an attractive voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) to get rid of the extra flab.

An attractive VRS will make them lean and fit for takeover by the private sector entities that are keen to enter the banking space, the sources said.

VRS is not forced exit but an option for those who would like to take early retirement with a good financial package, the sources said adding that it has been done in the past before the consolidation of some of the PSBs.

Out of PCA?

State-owned UCO Bank is hopeful of coming out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework very soon.

PCA is triggered when banks breach certain regulatory requirements such as return on asset, minimum capital, and quantum of the non-performing asset.

The bank had also met the other major criteria including net NPA norm, Goel said. Net NPA was at 3.4 per cent in March quarter against requirement of below six per cent. Return on Asset is also positive at Rs 167 crore and latest leverage ratio stood at 4.53 against a requirement of four per cent.

The government in the last round had infused Rs 14,500 crore of equity in Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Bank of India, and UCO Bank by issuing non-interest-bearing, non-transferable bonds to these state-owned lenders.

Central Bank had narrowed its loss to Rs 888 crore in FY21, from Rs 1,121 crore in FY20. IOB, which is yet to declare its results for Q4 of FY21, posted a profit of Rs 482 crore for the nine months to December 2020, as against a loss of Rs 8,527 crore for FY20. gross non-performing asset (NPA) for Central Bank are 16.55 percent while for IOB they are 12.19 percent.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of Baroda to sell 46 NPA accounts to recover Rs 597 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: State-owned Bank of Baroda will conduct an e-auction of as many as 46 NPA accounts later this month to recover dues of Rs 597.41 crore.

The lender, in a notification, said it intends to sell these NPA accounts to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) / banks / NBFCs or other financial institutions (FIs) on 100 per cent cash basis, for which the e-auction will take place on June 21, 2021.

The major NPA accounts put up for sale include Meena Jewels Export & Meena Jewellers Export (Rs 60.76 crore); Crystal Cable Industries (Rs 57.49 crore); J R Foods Ltd (Rs 41.60 crore); Shree Raghuvanshi Fibres (Rs 27.38 crore); Kaneri Agro Industries (Rs 24.69 crore); Man Tubinox (Rs 24.28 crore) and Aryans Educational and Charitable Trust (Rs 20.79 crore).

The last date for submission of expression of interest is June 19, the bank said, adding the completion of due diligence will take place on the same day.

“E-bidding timings will be from 11.30 AM to 12.30 PM with unlimited extension of 5 minutes in case the amount is increased by the bidders. The incremental amount shall be in multiple of Rs 10 lakh,” Bank of Baroda said.

With respect to Chennai-based Rahima Leather Exports against which there is an outstanding of Rs 9.13 crore, Bank of Baroda said it has received an ECGC claim of Rs 1.18 crore.

This account will be retained by the bank and not be passed on to ARC/NBFC/bank/FIs, it said.

Bidder will also have to give an affidavit that they are “in no way connected to or acting on behalf of or in concert or on behalf of any of the accounts or its promoters, including promoter’s family”, as per the provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, it said.

The bank said any ECGC/CGTMSE claim received or to be received in any of the accounts under the sale will be retained by it and will not be passed on to ARCs/ banks/ NBFCs/ FIs.

The Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ECGC) is a government owned body which provides export credit insurance support to Indian exporters.

Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE) is a government owned trust which offers credit guarantee to financial institutions which give loans to the MSME sector.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank NPAs may be contained within earlier FSR numbers, says RBI governor, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India sees the non-performing assets of banks remaining within the projections of the financial stability report (FSR) given out in January.

“On NPA position our expectation is that whatever projection we have given in the last FSR, it will be within that. At the end of the March it looks the figures are quite manageable,” RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das told reporters after the Monetary Policy.

“I would not say anything beyond that because the numbers are coming in and our teams are assessing and we will spell out the details in the financial stability report,” he said.

Stable capital position

He said a large number of banks, both in public and private sectors, have raised additional capital from the market through out last year.

“I have mentioned in my statement the need to build up provisioning and capital buffers. so that is the message we are giving to banks and NBFCs that they need to augment their capital because there could be some stress arising out of the second wave. That is still an assessment.”

The overall capital position of the banks both in the public and private sector is at very stable levels and they are meeting the regulatory requirements, with some being even much higher.

Financial stability report

Banks’ gross non-performing assets may rise to 13.5% by September 2021, from 7.5% in September 2020 under the baseline scenario, according to the Financial Stability Report (FSR) released by RBI in January this year.

If the macroeconomic environment worsens into a severe stress scenario, the GNPA ratio may escalate to 14.8%, the report had said.

“The stress tests indicate that the GNPA ratio of all scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) may increase from 7.5% in September 2020 to 13.5% by September 2021 under the baseline scenario,” the FSR report added.

Among the bank groups, public sector banks’ (PSBs) GNPA ratio of 9.7% in September 2020 may rise to 16.2% by September 2021 under the baseline scenario, it noted.

The gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of private sector banks (PVBs) and foreign banks (FBs) may increase from 4.6% and 2.5% to 7.9% and 5.4%, respectively, over the same period.

In the severe stress scenario, the GNPA ratios of PSBs, PVBs and FBs may rise to 17.6%, 8.8% and 6.5%, respectively, by September 2021, the report said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of India posts Q4 profit of ₹250 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai, June 4

Bank of India (BoI) reported a standalone net profit of ₹250 crore in the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2021 against a net loss of ₹3,571 crore in the year ago quarter. The profit came on the back of a rise in other income and lower non-performing asset (NPA) provisions.

Net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was down 23 per cent y-o-y at ₹2,936 crore (₹3,793 crore). Other income, including income from non-fund based activities such as commission, exchange, brokerage, fees, forex income, profit/ loss on sale of investments, and recovery from written off accounts, rose 22 per cent to ₹2,053 crore (₹1,688 crore).

Also read: Bank of India net rises to ₹541 crore in Q3

Loan loss provisions were 58 per cent lower y-o-y at ₹3,089 crore (₹7,316 crore).

Decline in NPAs

Gross NPAs declined to 13.77 per cent of gross advances as at March-end 2021 against 14.78 per cent as at March-end 2020. Net NPAs declined to 3.35 per cent of net advances as at March-end 2021 against 3.88 per cent as at March-end 2020.

Global net interest margin declined to 2.01 per cent as at March-end 2021 against 2.90 per cent as at March-end 2020.

Global deposits increased by 13 per cent y-o-y to ₹6,27,113 crore. Global advances nudged up 1.46 per cent y-o-y to ₹4,10,436 crore, mainly on the back growth in domestic retail, agriculture and MSME advances, and Government & Government-guaranteed advances.

During the quarter the total reduction in NPAs was higher at ₹5,830 crore (₹2,944 crore). About 81 per cent of this reduction was on account of write-offs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 10 11 12 13 14 18