Govt garners Rs 4,000 cr via 1.95% stake sale in Axis Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The government has raised about Rs 4,000 crore from sale of 1.95 per cent stake in Axis Bank held through SUUTI, DIPAM Secretary Tuhin Kanta Pandey said on Thursday.

“The OFS of Axis Bank got good response from investors with SUUTI garnering about Rs 4,000 cr (subject to reconciliation). Thanks to all for their participation,” the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) secretary tweeted.

Through the two-day offer for sale (OFS), the government sold around 5.80 crore shares or 1.95 per cent stake held in Axis Bank through the Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India (SUUTI) at a floor price of Rs 680 a share.

This includes a base issue size of 3.60 crore shares and a greenshoe option of over 2.20 crore shares.

At the cut off price of Rs 701 a share, the 1.95 per cent stake sale fetched around Rs 4,000 crore to the exchequer.

SUUTI held 3.45 per cent stake in Axis Bank at the end of March 2021.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU fines UBS, Nomura, UniCredit $452 million over bond cartel, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


European Union antitrust regulators fined UBS, UniCredit and Nomura 371 million euros ($452 million) on Thursday in connection with a European government bond trading cartel.

The penalties are the latest to punish the financial industry for alleged involvement in foreign exchange cartels, Euribor and Libor benchmark cartels, and bonds cartels.

The three banks said in statements that they would appeal or were considering doing so.

The European Commission said the European government bond cartel ran from 2007 to 2011, with traders from the banks informing each other on their prices and volumes offered in the run-up to the auctions and the prices being shown to their customers or to the market in general via multilateral chatrooms on Bloomberg terminals.

“A well-functioning European government bonds market is paramount both for the eurozone member states issuing these bonds to generate liquidity and the investors buying and trading them,” European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.

UBS said the fine related to “a legacy issue” and it had since taken action to improve its processes.

“Taking into account relevant provisions, this matter may have an impact of up to $100 million on UBS’s second quarter 2021 results,” it said.

UniCredit said the findings did not show any “wrongdoing on its part”.

“UniCredit will appeal the decision before the European Courts,” the Italian bank said in a statement.

Nomura said it had introduced measures to ensure “the highest levels of integrity at all times” and would consider all options, including an appeal.

“The decision issued today by the European Commission and associated fine imposed on Nomura relates to historic behaviour by two former Nomura employees for an approximate 10 month period in 2011,” it said.

The European Commission said Bank of America, RBS (now known as NatWest), Natixis and WestLB (now known as Portigon) also took part in the cartel.

NatWest escaped a 260-million-euro fine as it alerted the cartel to the EU competition watchdog. Bank of America and Natixis were also not fined because their infringement falls outside the limitation period for imposition of fines, the Commission said.

It said Portigon, the legal and economic successor to WestLB, received a zero fine as it did not generate any net turnover in the last business year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Sundaram Home Finance reports Rs 37-crore net in Q4

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The company said it is looking to raise Rs 2,500 crore this year through a mix of debt instruments and bank funding for funding its growth plans.

Sundaram Home Finance, the wholly owned subsidiary of Sundaram Finance, has reported a net profit of Rs 36.60 crore for the Q4 of FY21, compared with Rs 82 crore for the corresponding period in the previous year. The net profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 included a one-time exceptional item of Rs 60 crore, on account of write back of deferred tax liability. Hence the net profit for the two periods was not comparable, the company said in a statement.

Disbursements for Q4 went up 18% to Rs 459.38 crore, against Rs 389.60 crore. The company said it is looking to raise Rs 2,500 crore this year through a mix of debt instruments and bank funding for funding its growth plans.

For FY 21, the company registered a net profit of Rs 191 crore, compared with Rs 218 crore logged in the previous year. The net profit for the two periods was not comparable due to the inclusion of one-time exceptional item of Rs 60 crore. It registered disbursements of Rs 1,254.05 crore for the full year as against Rs 2,112.09 crore.

The deposit base went up to Rs 1,810 crore as on March 31, 2021, a net accretion of Rs 204 crore, it said. Lakshminarayanan Durais-wamy, MD, Sundaram Home Finance, said, “While it was a gloomy start to FY21, marked by lockdown in the first couple of months, the latter half of the year panned out well and we saw a gradual but certain recovery. The real estate sector showed remarkable tenacity in 2020 against unprecedented odds. Over the five month period between November 2020 and March 2021, we saw demand getting back to pre-Covid levels and a nice momentum was starting to build. The fourth quarter was the silver lining in the last financial year with the return of customer confidence.”

The company, which has 115 branches across the country, provides home loans, plot loans, home improvement and extension loans and loans against property.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI mandate: Wallets, cards to be made interoperable

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The requirement of submitting data on cash withdrawals to the RBI mentioned has been dispensed with.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has mandated that all prepaid payment instruments (PPIs) or wallets that are fully KYC-compliant be made interoperable by March 31, 2022. The central bank announced this through a notification issued late on Wednesday.

“It shall be mandatory for PPI issuers to give the holders of full-KYC PPIs (KYC-compliant PPIs) interoperability through authorised card networks (for PPIs in the form of cards) and UPI (for PPIs in the form of electronic wallets),” the notification said.

Interoperability shall be mandatory on the acceptance side as well and it will be enabled by March 31, 2022. PPIs for mass transit systems (PPI-MTS) shall remain exempted from interoperability, while gift PPI issuers have the option to offer interoperability.

As announced during the last monetary policy review on April 7, the notification increased the maximum amount outstanding in respect of full-KYC PPIs to Rs 2 lakh from Rs 1 lakh.

The notification also laid down the rules for enabling cash withdrawal from full-KYC PPIs issued by non-banks. There will be a maximum limit of Rs 2,000 per transaction with an overall limit of Rs 10,000 per month per PPI. All cash withdrawal transactions performed using a card or wallet shall be authenticated by an additional factor of authentication (AFA) or PIN. Issuers offering withdrawals shall put in place proper customer redressal mechanisms. They will also be required to put in place a suitable cooling period for cash withdrawals upon opening the PPI or loading or re-loading of funds into the PPI to mitigate the risk of fraudulent use.

The cash withdrawal limit from points of sale (PoS) terminals using debit cards and open system prepaid cards issued by banks has also been rationalised to Rs 2,000 per transaction within an overall monthly limit of Rs 10,000 across all locations. Earlier, withdrawals via this mode were capped at Rs 1,000 for tier I and II centres, and Rs 2,000 for other centres. The requirement of submitting data on cash withdrawals to the RBI mentioned has been dispensed with.

Last month, RBI had said interoperability, cash withdrawals and opening the use of RTGS and NEFT to non-banks was aimed at achieving parity between the two sets of entities. Then executive director and now deputy governor T Rabi Sankar had said, “The idea behind allowing cash withdrawals, etc from non-bank PPI issuers is essentially to level the playing field between banks and non-banks, and also achieve the comfort that it reduces the need to hold cash. The fact that a PPI holder has this comfort that I can whenever I want access cash reduces the actual need to hold cash. That, we believe, will give a big fillip to digitisation in the system.”

Industry players have earlier lauded these moves, saying that interoperability might help wallets claw back the space they had lost to banks and other players with the rise of Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and the new KYC requirements. There is also a view that non-banks will thus be able to effectively compete for micro-savings from the under-banked segments.

Shilpa Mankar Ahluwalia, partner – fintech, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co, said, “RBI has made four key changes that will create a much greater level playing field between bank and non-bank PPI issuers…These quasi bank payment features will enable much wider usage and penetration of PPIs pushing the growth of digital payments.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘We have a lot of experience from the last fiscal’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Nitin Chugh, MD & CEO, Ujjivan Small Finance Bank

The impact of the second wave of Covid is far widespread than that of the first wave, when there was not much impact in rural areas and not much loss of livelihoods and radical reduction in collection efficiency, observes Ujjivan Small Finance Bank MD & CEO Nitin Chugh. In an interviw with Mithun Dasgupta, Chugh says the bank will have to estimate how much loan restructuring would be needed for microfinance portfolio, going forward. Excerpts:

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank’s net profit for the fourth quarter last fiscal jumped 86.5% year-on-year. However, its total income and net interest income (NII) fell during this quarter. What are the reasons behind these decreases?
There is only one reason. We had recognised the pro forma GNPAs as GNPAs after the Supreme Court vacated the stay (on banks for classifying loans which were standard as on August 31, 2020, as non-performing assets). That led to the reversal of interest income on GNPAs or de-recognising of the income to the extent of around `75 crore. And, that led to reduction in income as well as reduction in net interest margin (NIM).

Going forward, how do you expect the interest income growing?
I think as long as the loan book continues to grow. Last fiscal we grew by 7%, but that was largely because of we started to push the businesses only from the December onwards. We are now confident that since we were able to grow the book by nearly 11% quarter-on-quarter in the fourth quarter, as and when things get normalised, which we are hoping will happen hopefully by the end of the current quarter, then we should go back to rebuilding the businesses and growing. So, the income will, therefore, continue to grow as the book grows.

How much provisions did you set aside towards Covid-related risks?
In Q3, we had taken the accelerated Covid provision of Rs 547 crore making the aggregate provision to Rs 1,029 crore at the balance sheet level. From Rs 1,029 crore, we had written off Rs 74 crore in Q4 which is also the total write-off during the year, that brings down the provisions level to Rs 955 crore. That is what we are holding even now. We have free provisions of Rs 172 crore, and the balance is provided on account level, which makes our provision coverage ratio (PCR) of 60%. We had made provision of Rs 25 crore on interest accrued on proforma GNPA in Q3, which got reversed post the Supreme Court order.

Amid the second wave of Covid, how do you see the asset quality for the bank’s microfinance portfolio in the future?
The bank had made the upfront provisions due to the deterioration of the asset quality that we saw in the last financial year. Obviously, there is continuing stress. A lot of our customers had not even recovered from the first wave. This time around the infections keep spreading in rural areas as much as in the cities. So, the impact is far widespread than ever before. Last time, we did not see much impact in rural areas, we did not see loss of livelihood and radical reduction in collection efficiency. But, it does look like that the second wave will probably get resolved in the next 30-45 days the way the cases are coming down now. The RBI has very timely announced a lot of measures, especially for the small finance banks. So, we have those framework available to us to operate efficiently and responsibly, in terms of restructuring, etc. We have a lot of experience from the last financial year. We do know that what kind of things will work for collections and disbursal. At the end of March 2021, 96% of our microfinance customers were paying, fully or partly. In April collection efficiency dropped to 88%. At the moment, everywhere across the country, collections are lower than April.

How much bad loans did you write off for microfinance portfolio last fiscal? And, what is the outlook for restructuring, going forward?
For the whole year, we wrote off Rs 74 crore, and of that microfinance was around Rs 60 crore. All these accounts were NPAs as of February. We did not do any restructuring in microfinance loans. We did minor restructuring in housing and SME loans, which were less than Rs 30 crore. This time around we will have to estimate how much restructuring will be needed for the microfinance loan and we are working on the available policy frameworks.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Sundaram Home Finance Q4 net dips 55% to ₹36.6 cr

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Sundaram Home Finance’s net profit for the fourth quarter of FY21 was down 55 per cent to ₹36.6 crore. The company reported a net profit of ₹82 crore in the same period last year.

However, the company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sundaram Finance, said that the results of the two periods are not comparable as net profit in the year-ago quarter had an exceptional item of ₹60 crore on account of write back of deferred tax liability.

The company said that on a comparable basis, profit from continuing operations for Q4FY21 went up 68 per cent to ₹36.60 crore (₹21.68 crore), excluding the one-time exceptional item of ₹60 crore during Q4FY20.

Disbursements during the fourth quarter went up 18 per cent to ₹459.38 crore (₹389.60 crore) while deposits saw a net addition of ₹204 crore to ₹1,810 crore as on March 31.

“The real estate sector showed remarkable tenacity in 2020 against unprecedented odds. Over the five-month period between Nov’20 and March’21, we saw demand getting back to pre-Covid levels and a nice momentum was starting to build,” Lakshminarayanan Duraiswamy, MD, Sundaram Home Finance, was quoted in a press release.

In FY21, the company registered a net profit of ₹191 crore compared to ₹218 crore in FY20.

The company also said that it is looking to raise ₹2, 500 crore this year through a mix of debt instruments and bank funding to augment its growth plans.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Investors face losses amid outages in crypto bourses

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian crypto investors were left in the lurch amid crashing prices, as domestic cryptocurrency exchanges WazirX and CoinDCX saw outages late on Wednesday.

Crypto investors took to social media to complain that their deposits were not getting reflected and that they were unable to invest during dips. Some users also complained that they could not log into their accounts while others said mobile apps were not working.

Also read: Asia stocks struggle amid talk of US easing policy support, crypto crash puts markets on edge

Many of these cryptocurrency investors were keen on taking advantage of the falling Bitcoin prices to invest more, while others wanted to offload their holdings by converting them into rupee and withdrawing them.

Services of both the exchanges were restored within an hour or so.

Cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin have seen massive volatility in the last few days; a sharp drop in prices was witnessed on Wednesday. Bitcoin plunged by nearly 30 per cent to $31,000, erasing over $500 billion in value from its peak market value.

“The heavy price dip in the market has encouraged more people to buy, thereby causing a tremendous surge in our traffic. We’re seeing approximately 400 per cent more traffic than what we witnessed in the previous month,” said Nischal Shetty, CEO and Founder, WazirX.

To accommodate the rapidly growing traffic and volume, the exchange is also working on an upgrade for the WazirX trading engine named Project Raftaar, he said in a statement, adding that the first version should be ready soon.

This was the second such glitch on WazirX’s platform this month.

“Due to high user traffic, some of our users might be experiencing issues related to services on our website and apps,” CoinDCX had said.

Regulatory uncertainties

Despite regulatory uncertainties around its future, crypto currencies have been gaining popularity in India in the last one year since the Supreme Court lifted the ban on its trading.

Most exchanges have reported a large number of users signing up. Wazir X and CoinDCX are two of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the country.

But cryptocurrency exchanges and investors are facing a new challenge with most banks unwilling to process such transactions.

According to sources, the issue began cropping up late February and, in recent weeks, some banks have directed payment gateways not to process cryptocurrency-related transactions.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes ₹1 cr penalty each on CUB and TMB

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1 crore each on City Union Bank (CUB) and Tamilnad Mercantile Bank (TMB).

In the case of CUB, the RBI, in a statement, said the penalty has been imposed for contravention of/ non-compliance with certain provisions of the Reserve Bank of India (Lending to Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Sector) Directions, 2017 and the circulars on Educational Loan Scheme and Credit Flow to Agriculture – Agricultural Loans – Waiver of Margin/ Security Requirements.

In the TMB case, RBI imposed the penalty for non-compliance with some directions regarding “Cyber Security Framework in Banks”, 2016.

In both the aforementioned cases, the central bank said: “The penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of …the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

“This action is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.”

Meanwhile, RBI has imposed a Rs 90 lakh monetary penalty on Ahmedabad-based Nutan Nagarik Sahakari Bank.

The penalty has been imposed for non-compliance with directions contained in Master Directions on ‘Interest Rate on Deposits’, ‘Know Your Customer (KYC)’ and Circular on ‘Frauds Monitoring and Reporting Mechanism’, RBI said in a statement.

“This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under…the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

“This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers,” RBI said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Released liquidity may help banks to subscribe to G-Secs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Liquidity released on account of purchase of Government Securities (G-Secs/GS) aggregating ₹35,000 crore by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday may encourage banks to subscribe to G-Secs aggregating ₹32,000 crore at Friday’s scheduled auction.

Market participants offered to sell seven G-Secs aggregating ₹1,21,696 crore against the notified amount of ₹35,000 crore RBI wanted to buy under the second tranche of its G-sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP 1.0).

RBI accepted offers for six G-Secs aggregating the notified amount. It rejected all the offers for 7.95 per cent GS 2032.

The Central bank purchased the benchmark 5.85 per cent GS2030 under G-SAP at ₹99.26 (yield: 5.9526 per cent) against the previous close of ₹99.10 (5.9749 per cent). Bond prices and yields are inversely related and move in opposite directions.

Stable and orderly evolution

Under G-SAP, the RBI commits upfront to a specific amount of open market purchases of G-Secs with a view to enabling a stable and orderly evolution of the yield curve amidst comfortable liquidity conditions.

Meanwhile, the central bank decided to conduct a 14-day Variable Rate Reverse Repo auction for a notified amount of ₹2-lakh crore under its Liquidity Adjustment Facility on May 21.

The aforementioned auction is conducted by RBI to suck out excess liquidity from the banking system.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 338 339 340 341 342 540