European Union’s digital banknotes are getting ready, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


-By Ishwari Chavan

The currency aims to reach a population of 340 million, if adopted by all of the nations part of the Eurozone.

The European Central Bank, in July 2021 launched a digital euro project. The investigation phase that will start this month and last for about two years will aim to address key issues regarding design and distribution.

Central banks around the world, including the Reserve Bank of India, have been contemplating the launch of their very own CBDC. A total of 81 countries, representing 90% of global GDP, are exploring CBDC as of May 2021, compared with 35 countries in May 2020, according to Atlantic Council, a US think tank.

“Some of the other countries, like the UK and Sweden, also have their own projects, which are more or less in a similar stage in terms of progress, following their own path in terms of policy and design,” Aleksi Grym, head of digitalisation at Bank of Finland said.

The currency aims to reach a population of 340 million, if adopted by all of the nations part of the Eurozone.

What is Digital Euro?

The Digital Euro would be a form of central bank money issued by the European Central Bank, and will remain its liability at all times.

According to the ECB, the Digital Euro would still be a euro, like banknotes but digital. It would be an electronic form of money issued by the Eurosystem (the ECB and national central banks) and accessible to all citizens and firms. It will not be a parallel currency.

“The broad consensus is that CBDC would complement rather than substitute any existing part of the financial industry,” said Grym.

The operational and legislative framework to introduce the CBDC will be discussed with the European Parliament and other European institutions, and the access to the digital euro will be intermediated by the private sector.

What are the reasons to issue a digital Euro?

The Digital Euro will be a viable option for the Eurosystem, in order to support digitisation in payments. It could act as a new monetary policy transmission channel and mitigate risks to the normal provision of payment services, the ECB said.

The bank further mentioned that it could serve as a response to a significant decline in the role of cash as a means of payment.

Furthermore, the bank said that it could reduce the significant potential for foreign CBDCs or private digital payments to become widely used in the euro area while fostering the international role of the euro.

What will it look like?

The ECB has not yet specified a particular design of a Digital Euro. It wants to fulfil a number of principles and requirements including accessibility, robustness, safety, efficiency and privacy.

Although, based on the possible features of a Digital Euro, two broad types have been identified that would satisfy the desired characteristics – offline and online.

“The design of the CBDC has to be compatible with the objective of monetary and financial stability,” Grym said.

“For the Eurozone, we primarily look at retail CBDC, and the reason for that is that we already have quite a sort of advanced infrastructure for the wholesale cases,” he added.

When will the Eurozone have its CBDC?

The CBDC project was launched in July this year. However, the ECB has said that the end of this project will not necessarily result in the issuance of this currency, and that the central bank is merely preparing for the possibility of its issuance in the future.

“From the European perspective, we kind of envision what the world will look like not today but in 10, 20 or 30 years. The idea is that we’re looking at moving towards a much more digitized world, which is moving faster.That’s where cbdc will be designed for not necessarily the work we see today,” Grym said.

The investigation phase will examine the advantages and weaknesses of specific types of digital euro and how they would meet the needs and expectations of European citizens, businesses and financial intermediaries.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

As India’s bad bank knocks, ARCs seek relaxations from RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the bad bank on the anvil, asset reconstruction companies have sought relaxation of the pricing structure for the purchase of bad loans, funding from banks, and clarity on participating in insolvency cases as a resolution applicant. These are among the suggestions made by ARCs to the committee formed by the Reserve Bank of India in April.

Usually, sales take place either on a full-cash basis or under the 15:85 structure, where 15% is paid as upfront cash and the remaining in the form of security receipts.

ARCs have sought a reduction in the minimum investment requirement to 2.5% from 15% in cases where cash is fully paid upfront.

The cash proportion of 15% has pushed the ARCs to raise their returns through securitisation and asset reconstruction.

Unless the ARC recovers 130% of the acquisition value, it will not make its return. Even at 100%, an ARC will make a loss because the management fee of 1-2% doesn’t make any ARR for ARC. Recovery should be over 130% so that 100% of security rights will be redeemed.

Also read: What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?

Also, in September 2016, the Reserve Bank of India introduced new regulatory guidelines regarding provisioning. From April 2018 banks have to sell at 90% cash and 10% SRs. If a bank holds more than 10% SR, it had to continue provisioning for the loan which is not even on their books. So there is no incentive for them to transfer to ARCs. Now no banks transfer on 15:85 and all deals are in cash.

Bank funding

Asset reconstruction companies have asked RBI to allow bank funding for them on the lines of provided to non-banking finance companies. They have also sought doing away with dual-provisioning norms, a move which will benefit banks the most.

ARCs have suggested that bank provisioning needs to be solely based on the rating agency-determined net asset value of the security receipts.

From April 2018, banks have had to make provisions for stressed assets that are sold, assuming they remain on the books. This is applicable in cases where security receipts make up for more than 10% in the sale of non-performing assets.

Banks also have to make mark-to-market provisions in cases where the rating of security receipts is downgraded. Security receipts are valued on net asset values, linked to recovery ratings, which is an assessment of probable recovery from an underlying non-performing asset by rating agencies.

With banks not having to go for dual provisioning, they sell NPAs on a 15:85 structure, making more NPAs available for ARCs.

Currently, outstanding security receipts are estimated to be around Rs 1.1 lakh crore.

The RBI committee

In April this year, the RBI has formed a six-member panel under the chairmanship of Sudarshan Sen, former RBI executive director, to examine the role of asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) in stressed debt resolution, including under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 and review their business model.

The committee is reviewing the legal and regulatory framework of ARCs and recommend measures to improve their efficacy. It will submit its report within three months from the date of its first meeting. As of January, the number of ARCs registered with the RBI stood at 28.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICICI Bank seeks buyers for Rs 338-crore exposure to Soma Infrastructure

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In an order dated September 20, the Hyderabad ‘B’ bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had said that Soma Infrastructure was a subsidiary of Soma Enterprise.

ICICI Bank on Monday sought expressions of interest (EoIs) from asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) for its Rs 338-crore exposure to Soma Infrastructure. The asset is being offered on a full-cash basis. Soma Infrastructure is a Hyderabad-based company that owes ICICI Bank over Rs 149 crore in principal dues, and another Rs 189 crore in accrued interest and other charges.

In an order dated September 20, the Hyderabad ‘B’ bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had said that Soma Infrastructure was a subsidiary of Soma Enterprise. “…it is clear that assessee is a subsidiary company and assessee has diverted the funds sanctioned by ICICI Bank to the step down subsidiaries i.e. Beta Infratech P. Ltd. and Soma Jabalpur Rewa Tollway Pvt. Ltd.(SPV),” the tribunal observed in the order.

The tribunal further said that Soma Infrastructure is a company incorporated and active in providing consultancy services to its parent company and has no other business connections with the other step-down subsidiaries of Soma Enterprise, except related concern. “The assessee was utilised by the parent company to source the funds from the bank after giving the required bank guarantee. “The funds were utilised by the step down companies and we notice that assessee has advanced to M/s Beta Infratech as long term unsecured loan,” the order said. The funds were utilised in the business for the purpose of making payments for fixed assets and capital work-in-progress. At the same time, Soma Jabalpur Rewa Tollway received the loan from Soma Infrastructure and diverted it to the holding company, the appellate tribunal said.

In February this year, lenders to the parent company Soma Enterprise, led by State Bank of India, had also initiated the process for selling their loans. The loans to this company stood at Rs 2,099 crore as on March 31, 2020, while investments in it were to the tune of Rs 1,345 crore.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Fuel Rates: Petrol, Diesel Remain Unchanged For Second Straight Day

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Sneha Kulkarni

|

Petrol and diesel prices across the country remained steady for the second day in a row Monday, after rising for four days in a row until Sunday. The Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) made the most recent fuel price adjustment on October 17th.

In Delhi, petrol and diesel prices were at an all-time high of 105.84 per litre and 94.57 per litre, respectively.

Fuel Rates: Petrol, Diesel Remain Unchanged For Second Straight Day

One litre of petrol costs 111.77 rupees in Mumbai, while diesel costs Rs 102.52

In Kolkata, West Bengal, petrol and diesel were priced at 106.43 per litre and 97.68 per litre, respectively. In Chennai, a litre of petrol costs Rs 103.01 and a litre of diesel costs Rs 98.92.

Petrol is currently at or above Rs 100 a litre in all state capitals, while diesel is at or above Rs100 in more than a dozen states. In Bengaluru, Daman, and Silvassa, diesel prices surpassed Rs100 per litre.

Meanwhile, the country’s soaring fuel prices are unlikely to be reversed very soon. The central government is in talks with a number of oil-exporting countries about oil supply and demand, but there is no chance of fast price relief.

Petrol prices have jumped 16 times and diesel prices have increased 19 times since the end of a three-week rate revision break in the last week of September.

State-owned fuel retailers have begun passing on the higher incidence of cost to consumers beginning October 6, eschewing the modest price rise strategy. For the first time in seven years, the international benchmark Brent crude oil is trading at $84.8 per barrel.

Story first published: Tuesday, October 19, 2021, 7:50 [IST]



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI slaps Rs 1.95-cr fine on StanChart for lapses in compliance

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The examination of the risk assessment report, inspection report and all related correspondence revealed non-compliance with directions issued by the regulator

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Monday imposed a fine of Rs 1.95 crore on the Indian operations of Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance with multiple regulatory directions. The foreign bank was found to be non-compliant with directions pertaining to reversal of the amount involved in unauthorised electronic transactions and reporting of cyber security incidents, among others.

The statutory inspection for supervisory evaluation of the bank was conducted by the RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2020. The examination of the risk assessment report, inspection report and all related correspondence revealed non-compliance with directions issued by the regulator.

The non-compliance pertained to failure to credit (shadow reversal) the amount involved in unauthorised electronic transactions, not reporting cyber security incident within the prescribed time period, authorising direct sales agents to conduct KYC verification, and failure to ensure integrity and quality of data submitted in the central repository of information on large credits.

“In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for contravention of / non-compliance with the aforesaid directions, as stated therein. After considering the bank’s replies to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing, and additional submissions made by the bank, the RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of contravention of / non-compliance with the aforesaid RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the bank, to the extent of non-compliance with the aforesaid directions,” the RBI said on its website.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad invites e-Tender through MSTC for Design, Supply, Installation, testing and Commissioning of UVGI System for Air Handling Units (AHUs) at Main Office Building, Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad. The e-Tender along with the detailed Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) and Pre-qualification criteria are available at the e-Tendering portal of MSTC Ltd (http://mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi) under the menu “Tenders”.

2. All interested bidders must register themselves with MSTC through the above-mentioned website to participate in the tendering process.

3. The estimated cost of the work is ₹21 lakh, however the actual amount may vary.

4. The Schedule of e-Tendering process is as follows:

a. e-Tender Name Design, Supply, Installation, testing and Commissioning of UVGI System for Air Handling Units (AHUs) at Main Office Building, Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad
b. e-Tender no RBI/Hyderabad/Estate/164/21-22/ET/223
c. Mode of Tender e-Procurement System
(Online Part I – Techno-Commercial Bid and Part II – Price Bid through www.mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi)
d. Date of NIT available to parties to download October 18, 2021
e. Date of Pre-Bid meeting October 26, 2021 at 11:30 AM
f. Earnest Money Deposit ₹42,000.00 (₹ Forty-two thousand only) from all the bidders in the form of NEFT/ Demand Draft/BG in Bank’s format as in Annex-II in favour of Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad before 02:00 PM of November 09, 2021.

Details for NEFT
IFSC Code – RBIS0NEFTHY (0 is zero)
A/c number – 8614038
Beneficiary Name: Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad
Your Firm’s Name
Remarks: Air Disinfecting System for Central Air-conditioning

g. Last date of submission of EMD Up to 02:00 PM on November 09, 2021
h. Date of Starting of e-Tender for submission of on line Techno- Commercial Bid and price Bid at www.mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi 10:00 AM of October 27, 2021
i. Date of closing of online e-tender for submission of Techno-Commercial Bid & Price Bid 2:00 PM on November 09, 2021
j. Date & time of opening of Part-I (i.e. Techno-Commercial Bid) 3:00 PM on November 09, 2021
k. Date & Time of opening of Part- II (i.e. Price Bid) Will be informed to all the eligible bidders

5. Eligibility Criteria: –

Only those contractors, who are expert in central air-conditioning and fulfil the following pre-qualification criteria, will be considered eligible to participate:

(i) Tenderers/ contractors should have minimum 3 years of experience in the field of undertaking similar works viz. UVGI / air disinfecting system in the centralized air conditioning/ Air Handling Units for the large office buildings/commercial premises/industrial houses and have, during the last 3 years (works completed as on June 2021) executed successfully similar works individually costing as under:

(a) One work each costing not less than 80% of estimated cost

OR

(b) Two works each costing not less than 50% of estimated cost

OR

(c) Three works costing not less than 40% of estimated cost

(ii)Have a minimum yearly turnover of Rs.21 lakh during the last 3 financial years

(iii) Have a service set up at Hyderabad and/or Secunderabad for rendering after sales service.

In support of the pre-qualification criteria, tenderers are advised to upload the relevant document, indicating the UVGI/air-disinfecting system, such as work order and work completion certificate/ authenticated BOQ etc. in case of Government/ PSU/renowned/ listed organizations. In case of a private organization experience, TDS certificate for the said work is to be uploaded. Price bid/part-II shall be opened of only those tenderers who fulfil the eligibility criteria.

A tender submitted by a firm which is found to be not satisfying the above criteria will be liable for rejection.

6. The Part-II, i.e., Price-bid will be opened on the same day or later as intimated by the Bank in respect of only those contractors/bidders who satisfies all criteria stipulated in Part-I. The Bank reserves the right to accept or reject any or all e-Tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

Applicants intending to apply will have to satisfy the Bank by furnishing documentary evidence in support of their possessing required eligibility and in the event of their failure to do so, the Bank reserves the right to reject their candidature. Tenders without EMD will not be accepted under any circumstances.

All the tenderers may please note that any amendments / corrigendum to the e-tender, if any, issued in future will only be notified on the RBI Website and MSTC Website as given above and will not be published in the newspaper.

Regional Director

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India today released the October 2021 issue of its monthly Bulletin. The Bulletin includes Governor’s Statement, Monetary Policy Statement, 2021-22 Resolution of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) October 6-8, 2021, Monetary Policy Report – October 2021, five Speeches, five Articles and Current Statistics.

The five articles are: I. State of the Economy; II Should Financial Stability be a Monetary Policy Goal? Evidence from India; III. Return on Physical Capital: Lessons from Firm Level Data; IV. Renewable Energy – The Silent Revolution; and V. The low yield environment and Forex Reserves management.

I. State of the Economy

Amidst an accentuation of global risks, the Indian economy is picking up steam, although the recovery is uneven and trudging through soft patches. The step up in vaccination, slump in new cases/mortality rates and normalising mobility has rebuilt confidence. Domestic demand is gaining strength while aggregate supply conditions are recouping, powered by the robust performance of kharif agricultural production and revival in manufacturing and services. Softer than expected food prices have eased headline inflation into a closer alignment with the target.

II. Should Financial Stability be a Monetary Policy Goal? Evidence from India

Literature is divided on whether financial stability should be adopted by an inflation targeting central bank as an ‘explicit’ policy objective. The present article empirically evaluates the question in the Indian context where financial stability is not an ‘explicit’ goal of monetary policy, but macroprudential policies and interest rate decisions are coordinated for simultaneous pursuit of both goals. Major highlights of the article are presented below:

Highlights

  • In this article, an aggregate macroprudential policy (MPP) index has been constructed using risk weights and provisioning for standard assets in housing, commercial real estate (CRE), consumer loans and capital market exposure; loan-to-value (LTV) ratio and cash reserve ratio (CRR).

  • An empirical analysis using macroeconomic variables for the period June 1997 to March 2020 suggests that monetary policy does exert influence over inflation and business cycles, but, at the same time, does not intensely influence financial cycles. Financial cycles are influenced by credit cycles, which in turn are impacted by macroprudential policies. Juxtaposing the MPP index with the repo rate shows that macroprudential policies in India have generally evolved in sync with the monetary policy.

  • The article concludes that the approach of using monetary and macroprudential policies in a coordinated manner has served the economy well, even after the adoption of flexible inflation targeting (FIT).

III. Return on Physical Capital: Insights from Firm Level Data

Return on physical capital (RoPC) is an important metric to gauge value creation in manufacturing due to the predominant role of physical capital in production. This study explores the variation in RoPC in the formal manufacturing sector across various firm characteristics such as age, location, size, type of ownership, capital intensity and type of activity using the firm level Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data for the year 2017-18.

Highlights

  • The aggregate RoPC of the Indian formal manufacturing sector estimated at 19.5 per cent stands comparable to the returns observed in other developing countries.

  • In MSMEs category, RoPC increases with size of the firms. For large firms, it decreased owing to its high capital-intensity.

  • The RoPC of Government (public) companies is slightly higher than that of Non-Government (public) companies. Nevertheless, the average return of Non-Government (private) firms is significantly higher than that of Government (private) firms.

  • RoPC holds an inverted U-shape relationship with firms’ age and labour employed, while it decreases monotonically with capital intensity.

  • Region wise, the north-east outperformed others due to very high returns of Pharma industry in Sikkim and Petroleum industry in Assam. These two industries pulled up the aggregate RoPC of the entire region.

IV. Renewable Energy – The Silent Revolution

Renewable Energy (RE) has played a pivotal role in India’s transition to a power surplus country. This article examines India’s current electricity market structure and the role of RE in electricity inflation. Empirical analysis suggests that sustained fall in generation costs for RE sources are exerting downward pressures on electricity tariffs in the whole sale and short-term markets. It argues that realizing the potential of the progress made in RE development of the promises of RE for a greener and low-cost economy warrants strategic policy changes, focusing on curbing cross-subsidisation, speedier resolution of financial stress facing DISCOMs, promotion of decentralised production and distribution and creating an environment for innovations and faster adoption of green technology.

Highlights

  • The share of REs in overall installed capacity has more than tripled from 11.8 per cent at end-March 2015 to 37.9 per cent at end-August 2021. The Government of India (GoI) has set a target of 175 GW installed capacity by 2022 for renewable electricity generation.

  • Empirical analysis shows significant positive relation between producer price of electricity (WPI electricity) and auction prices for conventional power, RE energy and spot price of energy exchange.

  • As regards CPI electricity, no meaningful relation was observed with the same set of regressors. The methodology for calculation of retail power tariffs, inter-sectoral cross subsidisation and the exclusion of other segments of electricity consumption barring household consumption in CPI electricity may have bearing on this result.

  • India’s per capita electricity consumption at 804.5 kwh in 2014 is much lower than the world average of 3132.8 kwh. RE by providing low-cost electricity can meet the increased demand in coming years.

  • Deregulation of the tariff structure and success in minimising transmission and distribution losses and cross-subsidisation could promote efficient price discovery and attract higher RE investment.

V. The Low Yield Environment and Forex Reserves Management

This article highlights the prominent drivers of the declining trend in nominal yields and the scope for looking beyond traditional ways to manage foreign exchange reserves in order to augment portfolio returns without undermining the goals of safety and liquidity.

Highlights

  • The short term and long-term interest rates in advanced economies have been witnessing a trend decline since the early 1980s. This ultra-low interest rate environment is a reflection of structural changes in the advanced economies and global financial markets, in particular well anchored low inflation/expected inflation, and trend decline in equilibrium real interest rates over the last 3 to 4 decades.

  • This low yield environment has made it an arduous task for the asset managers in general and reserve managers in particular, to generate reasonable returns. In light of the likely persistence of various structural reasons for low yields, it is imperative that reserve managers look beyond the traditional approaches for the management of reserves to maintain and enhance returns.

  • Some alternate ways to enhance returns on forex reserves could be increasing duration of portfolio, investment in new products/asset classes, active management of gold and investment in new markets. The choice of strategy, however, would require to be tailored to suit the risk appetite, investment priorities, skill sets and operational capabilities of individual institutions.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2021-2022/1062

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Government of India (GOI) has announced the sale (re-issue) of four dated securities for a notified amount of ₹24,000 crore as per the following details:

Sr No Security Date of Repayment Notified Amount
(₹ crore)
GoI specific Notification Auction Date Settlement Date
1 4.26% GS 2023 May 17, 2023 2,000 F.No.4(3)-B(W&M)/2021 dated October 18, 2021 October 22, 2021
(Friday)
October 25, 2021
(Monday)
2 5.63% GS 2026 Apr. 12, 2026 6,000
3 6.67% GS 2035 Dec 15, 2035 9,000
4 6.67% GS 2050 Dec. 17, 2050 7,000
  Total   24,000      

2. GoI will have the option to retain additional subscription up to ₹2,000 crore each against one or more security/ies mentioned above.

3. The securities will be sold through Reserve Bank of India Mumbai Office, Fort, Mumbai – 400001. The sale will be subject to the terms and conditions spelt out in the ‘Specific Notification’ mentioned above and the General Notification F.No.4(2)–W&M/2018, dated March 27, 2018.

4. The auction will be conducted using uniform price method for 4.26% GS 2023, 5.63% GS 2026, 6.67% GS 2035 and multiple price method for 6.67% GS 2050. Both competitive and non-competitive bids for the auction should be submitted in electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) system on October 22, 2021 (Friday). The non-competitive bids should be submitted between 10.30 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. and the competitive bids should be submitted between 10.30 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. The result will be announced on the same day and payment by successful bidders will have to be made on October 25, 2021 (Monday).

5. Bids for underwriting of the Additional Competitive Underwriting (ACU) portion can be submitted by ‘Primary Dealers’ from 9.00 a.m. up to 9.30 a.m. on October 22, 2021 (Friday) on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) system.

6. The Stocks will be eligible for “When Issued” trading for a period commencing from October 20, 2021 – October 22, 2021.

7. Operational guidelines for Government of India dated securities auction and other details are given in the Annex.

Ajit Prasad
Director   

Press Release: 2021-2022/1061


ANNEX

Type of Auction

1. For multiple price-based auction, successful bids will get accepted at the respective quoted yield/price for the security. For uniform price-based auction, bids will get accepted at the cut off yield/price accepted in the auction.

2. The auction will be yield based for new security and price based for securities which are re-issued.

3. In case of a Floating Rate Bonds (FRB), the auction will be spread-based for new security and price based for securities which are reissued. At the time of placing bids for new FRB, the spread should be quoted in percentage terms.

Minimum Bid Size

4. The Stocks will be issued for a minimum amount of ₹10,000/- (nominal) and in multiples of ₹10,000/- thereafter.

Non-Competitive Segment

5. In all the auctions, Government Stock up to 5% of the notified amount of sale will be allotted to the eligible individuals and institutions under the Scheme for Non-competitive Bidding Facility in the Auctions of Government Securities.

6. Each bank or Primary Dealer (PD) on the basis of firm orders received from their constituents will submit a single consolidated non-competitive bid on behalf of all its constituents in electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) system.

7. Allotment under the non-competitive segment to the bank or PD will be at the weighted average rate of yield/price of the successful bids that will emerge in the auction on the basis of the competitive bidding.

Submission of Bids

8. Both competitive and non-competitive bids for the auction should be submitted in electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) system.

9. Bids in physical form will not be accepted except in extraordinary circumstances.

Business Continuity Plan (BCP)-IT failure

10. Only in the event of system failure, physical bids will be accepted. Such physical bids should be submitted to the Public Debt Office, Mumbai through (email; Phone no: 022-22632527, 022-22701299) in the prescribed form which can be obtained from RBI website (https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewForms.aspx) before the auction timing ends.

11. In case of technical difficulties, Core Banking Operations Team should be contacted (email; Phone no: 022-27595666, 022-27595415, 022-27523516).

12. For other auction related difficulties, IDMD auction team can be contacted (email; Phone no: 022-22702431, 022-22705125).

Multiple Bids

13. An investor can submit more than one competitive bid in electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) system.

14. However, the aggregate amount of bids submitted by a person in an auction should not exceed the notified amount of auction.

Decision Making Process

15. On the basis of bids received, the Reserve Bank will determine the minimum price up to which tenders for purchase of Government Stock will be accepted at the auctions.

16. Bids quoted at rates lower than the minimum price determined by the Reserve Bank of India will be rejected.

17. Reserve Bank of India will have the full discretion to accept or reject any or all bids either wholly or partially without assigning any reason.

Issue of Securities

18. Issue of securities to the successful bidders will be by credit to Subsidiary General Ledger Account (SGL) of parties maintaining such account with Reserve Bank of India or in the form of Stock Certificate.

Periodicity of Interest Payment

19. Interest on the Government Stock will generally be paid half-yearly other than in case of securities with non-standard maturities. The exact periodicity of coupon payment is invariably mentioned in the specific notification for the issue of security.

Underwriting of the Government Securities

20. The underwriting of the Government Securities under auctions by the ‘Primary Dealers’ will be as per the “Revised Scheme of Underwriting Commitment and Liquidity Support” announced by the Reserve Bank vide circular RBI/2007-08/186 dated November 14, 2007 as amended from time to time.

Eligibility for Repurchase Transactions (Repo)

21. The Stocks will eligible for Repurchase Transactions (Repo) as per the conditions mentioned in Repurchase Transactions (Repo) (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2018 (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2018 as amended from time to time.

Eligibility for ‘When Issued’ Trading

22. The Stocks will be eligible for “When Issued” trading in accordance with the guidelines on ‘When Issued transactions in Central Government Securities’ issued by the Reserve Bank of India vide circular No. RBI/2018-19/25 dated July 24, 2018 as amended from time to time.

Investment by Non-Residents

23. Investments by Non-Residents are subject to the guidelines on ‘Fully Accessible Route’ for Investment by Non-residents in Government Securities and Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) in Government Securities: Medium Term Framework (MTF).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated October 18, 2021, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1 crore (Rupees One Crore only) on State Bank of India (the bank) for non-compliance with the directions contained in ‘Reserve Bank of India (Frauds classification and reporting by commercial banks and select FIs) directions 2016’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of section 47A (1) (c) read with sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

This action is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.

Background

A scrutiny was carried out by the RBI in a customer account maintained with the bank and the examination of the scrutiny report and all related correspondence pertaining to the same, revealed, inter alia, non-compliance with the aforesaid directions to the extent of delay in reporting of fraud in the said account to RBI. In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause why penalty should not be imposed on it for such non-compliance with the said directions.

After considering the bank’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made by the bank in the personal hearing, RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of non-compliance with the aforesaid RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty, to the extent of non-compliance with the aforesaid directions.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2021-2022/1060

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 194 195 196 197 198 16,279