Rana Kapoor’s wife, daughters remanded to judicial custody, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A special CBI court in Mumbai on Saturday denied bail to the wife and two daughters of Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor in a quid-pro-quo case involving private sector lender DHFL and remanded them to 14-day judicial custody.

Kapoor’s wife Bindu and daughters Radha Khanna and Roshini have been named as accused in charge sheets filed by the probe agency in the case, and the court, after taking cognizance of the charge sheet, had summoned the trio.

The three appeared in court and filed for bail through their legal team comprising Vijay Agarwal and Rahul Agarwal, who argued that the charge sheet was filed without Bindu, Radha and Roshni being arrested, and, therefore, as per a Supreme Court judgement, they deserve to be granted bail.

Vijay Agarwal further argued that the court had already exercised the discretion of issuing summons to his clients, which clearly shows there is no need for their arrests.

However, Special Judge S U Wadgaonkar rejected their bail applications and sent them to judicial custody till September 23.

After the prosecution submitted that the jail superintendent wouldn’t accept the custody of the accused without an RTPCR report, the court allowed the probe agency to keep the three in judicial custody till it was received.

As per the Central Bureau of Investigation, Kapoor, who is in jail in a related case being probed by the Enforcement Directorate, entered into a criminal conspiracy with DHFL’s Kapil Wadhawan.

The CBI has stated that between April and June, 2018, Yes Bank invested Rs 3,700 crore in short-term debentures of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL).

In return, DHFL’s Wadhawan allegedly “paid kickback of Rs 600 crore” to Kapoor in the form of loans to DoIT Urban Ventures, a firm controlled by Kapoor’s wife and daughters.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Fintech start-up IppoPay raises $250,000 in pre-seed funding

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


IppoPay, a Chennai-based fintech start-up that provides digital payment solutions to merchants in tier-2 and tier-3 cities, has raised $250,000 in pre-seed funding from early-stage investor Better Capital along with Prabhu Rangarajan (co-founder of M2P) and Sailesh Ramakrishnan (partner at Rocketship VC).

In a statement, the company said it intends to use the proceeds to reach 100,000 merchants and expand its suite of offerings.

IppoPay claims that its platform has recorded transactions worth ₹1,750 crore in over one crore transactions for about 5,000 merchants. IppoPay is currently partnered with YES Bank, Axis Bank, ICICI Bank and Paytm Bank.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mastercard ban boosts Visa’s biz, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Visa is consolidating its leadership in the Indian credit card market with most issuers who had partnered with Mastercard earlier signing up with it to continue issuing credit cards.

Shares of RBL Bank, the latest to sign up with Visa, rose over 2% on Tuesday after the private lender announced that it has signed up with Visa to issue credit cards. RBL has a 5% share of the Indian credit card market, which is disproportionate to its size due to its partnerships for co-branded cards, particularly the one with Bajaj Finserv.

“We would like to thank Visa as well as Finserv, our technology partner, for enabling this journey. With this launch, we are confident of meeting our annual plan of issuing 1.2-1.4 million credit cards in FY22,” said RBL Bank head (retail, inclusion & rural business) Harjeet Toor.

Like RBL Bank, Yes Bank and Federal Bank have said that they will start issuing Visa credit cards. Both private lenders have said that they would also be issuing RuPay credit cards.

What will help Visa gain more market share is the lifting of the ban on HDFC Bank from issuing credit cards. The embargo on HDFC Bank on issuing cards was lifted soon after Mastercard received a ban from RBI for not adhering to norms that require customer data to be stored only in India. HDFC Bank is the largest issuer of credit cards in the country and the lifting of the ban is expected to spur pent-up demand from its customer base.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

MFs sold YES Bank, Vodafone Idea; tweaked stakes in these Jhunjhunwala stocks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Domestic fund managers pared stakes in retail favourites Vodafone Idea and YES Bank, and tweaked their holdings in certain Rakesh Jhunjhunwala-backed companies, the monthly data for August suggest.

Data showed MFs held YES Bank shares worth Rs 137 crore as on August 31 compared with Rs 155 crore at the end of July. During the month, they trimmed their holding in the private lender to 15.15 crore shares from 17.67 crore shares. Retail and HNI investors owned 32.32 per cent stake in the lender at the end of the June quarter.

Vodafone Idea — where retail and HNI investors account for 17.73 per cent of the total 27.95 per cent public holding — also saw selling by mutual funds. These funds held 13.10 crore shares in the telecom operator as on August 31 compared with 30.04 crore shares as on July 31. In value terms, MFs now hold Rs 80 crore worth of Vodafone shares compared with Rs 248 crore shares earlier.

Lupin, where Rakesh Jhunjhunwala holds shares worth Rs 700 crore, was among the top MF buys for the month. Mutual funds held 5.92 crore Lupin shares as on August 31 compared with 5.13 crore in July. In value terms, they owned Rs 5,668 crore worth of Lupin shares compared with Rs 5,676 crore in July.

In Escorts, MFs held 88 lakh shares worth Rs 1,184 crore at August-end, against 73 lakh shares worth Rs 860 crore as of July-end. Jhunjhunwala owns about Rs 880 crore worth of Escorts shares as of today.

MFs sold YES Bank, Vodafone Idea; tweaked stakes in these Jhunjhunwala stocks
Jhunjhunwala, often called Big Bull, entered Indiabulls Housing and SAIL in the June quarter. While SAIL was the funds’ biggest sell in the largecap pack, Indiabulls Housing was their biggest buy in the smallcap pack, data compiled by ICICI Direct suggests.

MFs held Rs 1,962 crore worth SAIL shares at August-end, against Rs 2,987 crore at July-end. They owned Rs 344 crore worth Indiabulls Housing shares as of August-end, up from Rs 277 crore at July-end. Jhunjhunwala owns about Rs 700 crore worth of SAIL shares and just over Rs 200 crore worth of Indiabulls Housing shares.

MFs sold YES Bank, Vodafone Idea; tweaked stakes in these Jhunjhunwala stocks
Jubilant Ingrevia, another stock Big Bull has invested in, was on MFs’ sell radar. Funds cut their holding in this stock to Rs 38 crore from Rs 73 crore on a month-on-month basis. In Edelweiss Financial Services, mutual funds’ holding fell to Rs 55 crore from 95 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank, 6 others settle case with Sebi; pay Rs 1.65 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Private sector lender Yes Bank and six persons on Tuesday settled with Sebi a case pertaining to alleged selective disclosure of asset quality, after paying Rs 1.65 crore towards settlement amount.

Apart from the bank, the six persons who settled the case are — Ashish Agrawal, Niranjan Banodkar, Sanjay Nambiar, Devamalya Dey, Rajat Monga and Shivanand Shettigar.

The order comes after the entities approached Sebi to settle the proceedings initiated against them “without admitting or denying the findings of fact and conclusions of law”, through a settlement order. In a settlement order on Tuesday, Sebi said,” the instant adjudication proceedings initiated against applicants vide SCN (show cause notice) dated October 26, 2020 are disposed of”.

The regulator conducted an investigation in the affairs of Yes Bank during February 2019 to ascertain the possible violation of provisions of Sebi Act and PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices).

Pursuant to the investigation, Sebi observed certain violations were allegedly committed by the bank and the six persons and issued show cause notice to them in this regard in October 2020.

In the show cause notice, it was alleged that Yes Bank made a selective disclosure on February 13, 2019, highlighting “nil” divergence which had significant positive impact on the price movement and had not disclosed other issues mentioned in the Risk Assessment Report (RAR) as observed by RBI such as lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas of its functioning.

It was alleged that announcement made by Yes Bank to exchanges were “incomplete as only selective disclosures highlighting nil divergence in bank’s asset classification and provision from RBI norms were disclosed as per the RAR of RBI.”

“However, other lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas as identified in the RAR were not disclosed,” the order noted.

The announcement resulted in misleading the investors as the price of the scrip increased by around 30 per cent and volume of trading the scrip also increased substantially the next trading day i.e. February 14, 2019.

It was alleged that the bank and six persons, who were involved in the decision making process to make the information public, have violated the provisions of PFUTP norms.

The six persons were either a member of the Reputational Risk Management Committee (RRMC) or part of the decision making process in relation to the disclosures made on February 13, 2019. Pending adjudication proceedings, the applicants proposed to settle the proceedings initiated against them and filed settlement applications.

Thereafter, Sebi’s committee recommended that the case may be settled upon payment of Rs 1.65 crore by applicants on jointly and several liability basis and accordingly they remitted the amount. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) settled the case.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

YES Bank 50% off highs but tech charts say it’s a no go, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: YES Bank stock has plunged nearly 50 per cent from its 52-week high but retail and HNI participation on the counter has been on a rise.

In fact, since March 2020, individual bets have more than tripled on the stock, despite disappointing returns.

While fundamental analysts largely have a negative view of the stock, Crisil recently upgraded the bank’s rating on select debt instruments, on expectations of continued extraordinary systemic support from key stakeholders and a sizeable ownership by SBI. The stock barely moved. Technical analysis indicates a big reversal is unlikely on the stock, for now.

Nilesh Jain of Centrum Broking said YES Bank might see a pullback to the levels of Rs 12-12.50, as the stock is trading in oversold territory. He warned traders not to take any such gains as a sign of trend reversal and advised booking of profits if the scrip moved to Rs 13 level.

Major support for the stock stays at Rs 10.20, Jain said, adding that traders making a fresh entry on the counter should use this level as a stop loss.

Mazhar Mohammad of Chartviewindia.in said the stock traded in an extremely narrow trading range of Rs 11.30-10.50 for the last three weeks and was making indecisive formations, suggesting the counter might be positioning itself for a big swing in either direction. “However, considering the long-term trend, which is completely bruised and battered, upsides can be limited from current levels as the stock is trading even below its 2020 FPO price of Rs 12. Any stability above Rs 12 may extend the strength towards Rs 14. On the downside, corrections may get accentuated on a close below 10.50 levels,” Mohammad said.

Nagaraj Shetti, Technical Research Analyst at HDFC Securities said he does not see any substantial up move, as the stock has been in a continuous downtrend and fundamentals too are not supportive. “No big hopes for now,” he said.

Mohammad said if the stock falls to single digits for a week, the sentiment would turn extremely negative, which may eventually lead to a panic low of Rs 5.65. “Retail investors will be better off avoiding this counter,” he said.

Data showed individual investors, including retail and HNIs, accounted for 32.32 per cent stake in YES Bank as on June 30. These investors have hiked their stake in the bank for five consecutive quarters; it was 11.35 per cent in March 2020.

Rating agency Crisil recently upgraded its rating on select bonds and certificates of deposit of the bank, as it noted that there has been some stability in the bank’s deposit base in the past few quarters. After a reconstruction of the lender in March 2020, it has been adequately capitalised, it said. “At the same time, the ability of the bank to continue to build a strong retail liabilities franchise and a stable and sound operating business model with strong compliance and governance framework over the medium term needs to be demonstrated. Additionally, the bank’s asset quality is weak and the impact of the shift in business model to focus on granular retail and MSME segments will need to be seen over a longer period,” it said.

YES Bank’s total deposits have increased to Rs 1.63 lakh crore at June end from Rs 1.17 lakh crore as on June 30, 2020, and Rs 1.05 lakh crore as on March 31, 2020. The proportion of granular and sticky current account and savings account (CASA) deposits to overall deposits has also been improving. It stood at 27.4 per cent as on June 30 against 25.8 per cent on June 30, 2020. The bank’s capital position is adequate, supported by the capital raise of Rs 15,000 crore through a follow-on public offer in July 2020.

The common equity tier-I ratio and overall capital adequacy ratio stood at 11.6 per cent and 17.9 per cent, respectively, while the bank’s average liquidity coverage ratio remained adequate at 132 per cent in the June quarter, Crisil said.

But fundamental analysts are not impressed. Of 14 recommendations on the stock, there are 10 sell or strong sell calls, four hold but no buy recommendations. These analysts have a median 12-month price target of Rs 12 on the stock, with the lowest target standing at Rs 6.

The stock has not gained much even though the lender posted a 355.2 per cent YoY surge in net profit, at Rs 207 crore, in the June quarter, the highest quarterly profit since December 2018.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Former YES Bank chief ignored warnings of investment decisions from officials, chargesheet reveals, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Former YES Bank managing director and chief executive officer Rana Kapoor ignored warnings fromt the treasury and risk management teams, which led to huge losses, the latest charge sheet by the Central Bureau of Investigation showed.

The charge sheet was made public last week, and was reviewed by The Hindustan Times. “Investigation revealed that Rana Kapoor had shown undue personal interest in aforesaid investment and took premeditated decision of investment without discussing the matter with concerned officials, who were having adverse view against such investments,” said the supplementary charge sheet filed by CBI on July 13.

The CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) are investigating the loans issued by YES Bank when Kapoor was its MD and CEO (till January 2019).

Furthermore, Kapoor had misled the board through a false declaration on May 17, 2018, to enhance the exposure limit of DHFL from Rs 2,100 crore to Rs 4,000 crore, the chargesheet said. As a result, the board approved investment of Rs 2,000 crores and Rs 700 crore in a public issue of non-convertible debentures of DHFL. This was despite the investment team advising against the issue.

According to the CBI, Kapoors were paid huge bribes by Dewan Housing Finance Corp (DHFL) in lieu of favours extended by the bank. It alleged that a total of Rs 600 crore was paid in the form of investment.

The ED has alleged that loans worth around Rs 30,000 crore, when Rana Kapoor headed the bank, have turned into bad loans and Rs 20,000 crore have become non-performing assets.

So far, the ED has attached assets worth Rs 2,400 crore in the case, which include Rs 900 crore from Kapoors and Rs 1,411 crore from DHFL’s Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhawan.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dish TV gains 13% after Yes Bank move to sack board, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Shares of Dish TV were up nearly 13% on Tuesday after Yes Bank moved a shareholder proposal to overthrow the board, including the managing director and CEO Jawahar Lal Goel. The private lender, which acquired just below 26% in the company following debt resolution, served notice to remove five directors and proposed seven directors to be appointed in their place.

In June, the company’s board had approved the raising of funds through a rights issue of Rs 1,000 crore. The promoters of Dish TV had pledged their holding for credit facilities used by the Essel Group.

With lenders revoking the pledge, the promoter stake in the firm had fallen to below 6%. Yes Bank’s notice comes ahead of the company’s annual general meeting on September 27. Shares of the company rose to a high of Rs 16 during intraday trade on Tuesday before closing at Rs 15.5, up 12.7% from the previous close of Rs 13.8.

Explaining the grounds for removal of the board, the bank said the directors approved a rights issue process despite pending objections raised with them time and again, solely to dilute the shareholding of the bank, which is the largest shareholder, and to prejudice its interest.

According to a Yes Bank notice to the exchange, banks and financial institutions hold around 45% stake in the company, but the board is acting at the behest of minority shareholders holding merely 6% of the shares. The bank also said that the board had completely sidelined its multiple requests to reconstitute the board.

The notice has been sent to the board under Section 169 of the Companies Act, which empowers shareholders to remove a director. The company secretary has informed the exchange that it is taking steps to get the candidatures of the proposed new directors cleared from the information & broadcasting ministry, as prior approval of the authority is required.

The other four directors sought to be removed are Rashmi Aggarwal, who is currently associated with IMT-Ghaziabad and is on the board of other Essel Group companies, B D Narang, former chairman of Oriental Bank of Commerce, Shankar Aggarwal, an IAS officer, and Ashok Mathai Kurien, an entrepreneur.

Yes Bank has informed the exchanges that it has made repeated requests to the board to induct Akash Suri and Sanjay Nambiar who are part of the company’s top management and experts in their respective field. The bank has again proposed their names with five other directors. These are Vijay Bhatt, Haripriya Padmanabhan, Girish Paranjpe, N V Prabhutendulkar and Arvind Nachaya.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

YES Bank to oust 5 Director, MD of Dish TV board, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


YES Bank, which holds 25.63% stake in Dish TV India Ltd has sought the removal of the current directors and managing director of the DTH service provider, Dish Tv. The bank sent a special notice dated September 3, 2021, to Dish TV, demanding the removal of directors under Section 169 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The notice sought the removal of Dr Rashmi Aggarwal, Shankar Aggarwal, Ashok Mathai Kurien and Bhagwan Das Narang as directors, along with Jawahar Lal Goel as managing director of the company. The bank further said that consequent to Goel’s removal as the MD, he shall also “cease to be the chairperson of the company”.

YES Bank in the notice said, “The Board is purportedly acting at the behest of certain minority shareholders holding merely six per cent of the shares in the Company. Eeven though the Bank asked the Board to desist from approving the capital raising exercise by way of rights issue, the Board, without consulting the significant shareholders, went ahead to make a press announcement regarding its intention to proceed with a Rs 1000 Cr. rights issue,” read the notice.

The bank feels that the Board approved a rights issue process, pending objections raised by YES Bank time and again, solely to dilute the shareholding of the Bank and to prejudice the interests of inter alia the Bank which is the single largest shareholder of the Company as of date.

Dish TV, in its regulatory filing, said it is examining the demand raised by Yes Bank seeking the removal of directors.

The company also stated that the proposed new directors could be appointed only after obtaining approvals from the ministry of information and broadcasting. and other requisite approvals for appointment of new directors, within the statutory timelines.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Rana Kapoor’s wife, daughter get interim relief, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court Saturday granted interim bail to the wife and daughter of promoter of Yes Bank Ltd (YBL), Rana Kapoor who is jailed in the alleged fraud caused to the private bank.

While the CBI is probing him on corruption charges, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is investigating him in multiple cases of alleged money laundering.

In August, this year, CBI filed its supplementary chargesheet against Kapoor, his family members and four former junior employees of the bank in connection with the corruption case registered with the CBI pertaining to the loans given to DHFL.. The accused were summoned and the hearing in the said matter was scheduled for today.

Advocate Vijay Aggarwal and Advocate Rinku Garg, filed a bulky regular bail applications for Bindu Kapoor and Radha Kapoor, running into around 250 pages. The prosecution sought time to reply to the plea. The court has adjourned the matter to September 8.

Advocate Aggarwal argued before the court that his clients were charge-sheeted by the CBI without arrest and that in view of the latest judgment passed by the Supreme Court of India just two days back in Aman Preet Singh v/s CBI, his clients deserved to be granted bail.

He further argued that the court had already exercised the discretion of issuing summons to his clients, which clearly shows no need for the arrest of his clients. He contended that his clients were granted regular bail in December, 2020 by a special PMLA court in the said matter, “…which clearly shows that there were no chances of his clients absconding or tampering with evidence. Bindu Kapoor is a housewife and that Radha Kapoor Khanna had two young children so his clients shall be duly available to attend the trial”.

CBI’s counsel stated that the bail applications filed were bulky in nature and sought time to reply to it.

The court, after granting interim bail to Bindu Kapoor and Radha Kapoor Khanna, has kept the matter for reply by September 8.

According to the CBI’s first chargesheet filed last year, in June 2018, Kapoor, then the head of Yes Bank’s management credit committee, sanctioned a loan of Rs 750 crore on an application by the DHFL promoters in the name of Belief Realtors Pvt Ltd. for development of a Bandra Reclamation Project. This amount was advanced to RKW Developers, a company controlled by Dheeraj Wadhwan although the bank’s risk management team had pointed out multiple and serious issues in the proposal.

The agency’s probe revealed that the loan of Rs 750 crore was not utilised for the stated purpose.

Simultaneously, Kapil Wadhawan is said to have paid a kickback of Rs 600 crore to Kapoor and his family members in the garb of a builder loan from DHFL to DOIT Urban Ventures (India) Private Ltd. (DUVPL). Roshini Kapoor is one of the directors of DUVPL.

After deducting a processing fee, an amount of Rs 632 crore was transferred to RKW Developers. This amount was then routed to other entities controlled by the Wadhawans – KYTA Advisors and RIP Developers – to settle a loan obtained from DHFL for the same Bandra Reclamation Project in November 2015.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 3 4 5 6 7 14