SBI to consider raising $2 billion via bonds, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The country’s largest lender State Bank of India (SBI) on Tuesday said a committee of its central board will consider raising up to USD 2 billion (around Rs 14,942 crore) through bonds in this fiscal year. The Executive Committee of the Central Board is scheduled to have a meeting on April 28, 2021, the bank said in a BSE filing.

The committee will examine “the status and decide on long term fund raising in single / multiple tranches up to USD 2 billion through a public offer and/or private placement of senior unsecured notes in US Dollar or any other convertible currency during FY 2021 – 22”, the filing said.

SBI shares ended at Rs 352.9, up by 2.5 per cent, on BSE.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian banks back in British court to pursue Vijay Mallya bankruptcy order, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A consortium of Indian banks led by the State Bank of India (SBI) was back for a High Court hearing in London on Friday in pursuit of a bankruptcy order against embattled liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya, as they attempt recovery of debt from loans paid out to his now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines.

At a virtual hearing before Chief Insolvencies and Companies Court (ICC) Judge Michael Briggs, both sides presented closing arguments in the case being heard following an amendment to a bankruptcy petition filed last year.

While the Indian banks argue a right to waive their security over the Indian assets involved in the case in order to recover their debt in the UK, lawyers for the 65-year-old businessman counter that the funds in question involved public money held by state-owned banks in India which precludes them from such a security waiver.

They also point to ongoing interest rate legal challenges in India that impact upon the applicability of a UK bankruptcy order.

“We can’t second guess what’s going to happen in India,” said barrister Marcia Shekerdemian, arguing on behalf of SBI and others.

Mallya‘s barrister, Philip Marshall, referred to witness statements of retired Indian judges in previous hearings to reiterate that there is “public interest under Indian law” by virtue of the banks being nationalised.

“Any security cannot be unilaterally waived,” he said.

Judge Briggs said he would now deliberate on the details and deliver a judgement in a timely manner, expected in the coming weeks.

The SBI-led consortium of 13 Indian banks, which also includes Bank of Baroda, Corporation bank, Federal Bank Ltd, IDBI Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Jammu & Kashmir Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, Punjab National Bank, State Bank of Mysore, UCO Bank, United Bank of India and JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Co. Pvt Ltd, had initiated the proceedings against Mallya in December 2018.

There have been a series of hearings in the case since then as part of their efforts to recoup around 1.145 billion pounds in unpaid loans. There have also been separate but related hearings to allow the release of court-held funds for Mallya to meet his legal and living expenses.

The businessman, meanwhile, remains on bail as the UK Home Office deals with a “confidential” legal issue in the unrelated extradition matter.

The High Court was informed earlier this year that the businessman had applied for “another route” to stay in the UK, which most likely refers to asylum and such an application would have to be addressed confidentially before UK Home Secretary Priti Patel can sign off on the court’s extradition order, on charges of fraud and money laundering related to loans acquired for Kingfisher Airlines.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI MF likely to be listed in Q1 of FY23, says SBI MD, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A blip or a pause of three months should not affect the long-term story of our economy, says Ashwani Bhatia, MD, State Bank of India.

What is your understanding of the economy and the business impact of the second Covid wave? The first wave was brutal on banks and the economy. How big has been the collateral damage so far?
It is kind of a repeat of what we had last year except for the fact that the spike in the infection curve has been parabolic. That was not expected. Last year, the lockdown came in the last week of March. This time it has come in the third week of April in different locations. We saw an increase in deposits initially and then in the second half the credit pick up happened, housing loans took off, governments gave discounts and reduced the stamp duty. Interest rates are already at a record low, demand was there and people have saved a lot and spent a lot also.

Till the first week of April, we have seen the instalments coming in. So, to that extent, we have not seen any deterioration in the numbers. Last year, we also gave options to customers, especially on the retail side, to postpone their instalments. But all the instalments came and we did not see any stress in particular over there.

Going forward, I would only hope and pray that the same thing repeats in this financial year also. So far, it is holding up. We hope that this does not last more than a quarter and the flattening of the curve starts happening soon. The fact that the government announced vaccination for all above 18 from May 1 is welcome. Money has gone into Bharat and it has gone into Serum Institute. So, some kind of supplier credit has happened. From our side, we can only be hopeful. It is too early to take any call very frankly.

The problem is at the bottom of the pyramid, the lower strata and the MFI space where job losses have happened and migrant labour issues are going to be challenging. Will the second wave impact this end of the society and would the borrowing cycle be even harder because the numbers are so big that the impact is going to be felt very hard?
Quite possible but again, it is very difficult to give a definite direction. If more lockdowns are announced, there could be loss of life and livelihood just like last time. This may be repeated this year also but it is too early to take a call on the numbers or on the delinquencies. The initial estimates are that the lockdown is not as severe as it was last year where there was no traffic on the roads, no toll collection, the aircraft were not running, the trains were not permitted to run and so on. This time, it has been more measured, more calibrated. So the collapse of demand may not be as strong this time around.

Digital may continue to see an uptick, deliveries are happening and to that extent, the services sector that was really impacted may not be that bad. Very frankly, it is just a wait and watch kind of a situation and I do hope that within the next one month, things improve.

Last time, RBI came out with a moratorium to help the borrowers. The government came out with credit guarantee schemes which gave a lot of help to the entire SME and MSME sector. Do you think a similar scheme should be considered again?
I think the jugalbandi that you saw last year will continue into this year also. So let us just go back to what the governor said in his last policy statement. He actually used the word whatever it takes and there are plenty of measures that RBI can always take and the fact that he has announced things like the government securities acquisition programme, the fact that he said OMOs would be in addition to this. He will be accommodative to all those things. RBI will be in readiness to provide all support to the financial sector, to the industry and to the economy.

There was some optimism in the last couple of months. Could the second wave challenge that optimism?
Three months in the life of an economy does not really make a difference. At the most, it can be postponed by three months to six months. The commodities cycle still looks pretty strong, pretty robust. A blip or a pause of three months should not affect the long-term story of our economy.

Birla AMC has already filed for an IPO. There is HDFC Life. There is Nippon. There is Birla. When will SBI AMC see the light of the day?
I would think that within a year we should be done with the process. So SBI Mutual Fund will definitely be the next subsidiary of the State Bank Group that will be listed. So maybe around the first quarter of the next financial year.

The digital business which is the YONO business, has reached a critical mass both in terms of size and the fact that it is now nearing its break even while a lot of other fintech firms in the payment business are still losing money. When are you planning to monetise it?
The question of monetising may be some time away or we are not even thinking about it. It still needs to gain critical mass. We think that it will grow very fast this year also. We have been having a CAGR growth of about 35% there. We are in excess of 5 lakh crores plus the PMS that we do is another Rs 7 or 8 lakh crore or so. The total business that is managed is about Rs 13 lakh crore. It has scaled up very well. The profitability numbers are also likely to be decent for the previous financial year and the digital bit. So many changes are happening every other month. A lot of scope exists over there.

State Bank of India is the only large bank which did not raise capital even at the peak of the pandemic news. Do you have sufficient capital buffer to participate in the growth cycle?
We are very comfortable at the moment. You will see our numbers within the next one month. We think that our capital requirements are met by our own internal reserve and profits that we have. As time goes, we will have a look at equity raising but in the next six to seven months, I do not think we’ll be coming to the market. We are quite well and adequately capitalised at the moment.

Citi India has gone on record saying that they want to monetise their consumer businesses, credit business and wealth management businesses. Is there any business there which excites you?
Certainly. So maybe not the whole piece, but if it is available in segments, we may look at some part of it.

Can you be slightly more specific about which end of the business excites you?
There are plenty of things. Number one is their retail franchise itself. The kind of clientele they have is interesting as is credit cards business and even their housing portfolio. We will examine it once the opportunity is shown to us.

ET Now: A lot of other banks are facing breakdown issues including some of the best private sector banks but SBI has done a great deal of technology advancement. How did you adopt that?
Ashwani Bhatia: When SBI Mutual Fund became number one in the market, somebody asked me how could you beat the private sector players and I said why not? Where do we lack in human resources, capability and reach? I would give the same answer here also.

SBI has reinvented itself again and again. We have shown direction everywhere. In the ‘60s and ‘70s, it would have been the small scale industry (SSI) or agriculture, MSME sector wherever. I would think that we would continue to be thought leaders and provide support in whatever form and we will use the best in-house talent to improve our capabilities, our products and our technology.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks tag more borrowers as wilful defaulters during IBC suspension, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks slapped more borrowers with a wilful defaulter tag during April-December 2020 when the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was under suspension.

They classified loans of over Rs 28000 as wilful defaults during the first nine months of last fiscal as against around Rs 23,000 a year ago, according to a report.

A borrower is labelled wilful defaulter if the loans is not repaid despite having the means to repay or it is diverted for use other than the purpose.

A wilful defaulter tag borrower then faces a ban on bank funding the total outstanding wilful default as of December 31 at Rs 2.4 lakh crore with State Bank of India accounting for Rs 62,000 crore, of which Rs 18,000 crore were added in the first nine months of the last fiscal, according to data from credit bureau TransUnion Cibil.

The largest share of wilful defaulters is Maharashtra at over Rs 80,000 crore, followed by Delhi at Rs 32,000 crore and West Bengal at Rs 23,000 crore.

Fearing investigations, audit and vigilance inquiries, bankers generally do not want to opt for resolution and go for full recovery from the defaulter.

Top borrowers

The country’s top 100 wilful defaulters owe Rs 84,632 crore to banks as of March 2020, with the top 10 including, Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery and accounting for 32% of it, data from the Reserve Bank of India shows.

Banks tag more borrowers as wilful defaulters during IBC suspension

While banks wrote off nearly three-fourth of it to clean their balance sheet and get tax benefits, the default borrowers continue to appear in RBI’s internal CRILC database till they clear the default.
The total size of the top 100 wilful defaults rose 5.34% in FY20 from Rs 80,344 crore as of March 2019, according to data shared by RBI in response to an application under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

Mehul Choksi-owned Gitanjali Gems topped the wilful defaulters’ list with Rs 5,693 crore dues, followed by Jhunjhunwala brothers’ REI Agro with Rs 4,403 crore and Jatin Mehta’s Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery with Rs 3,375 crore.

The top 10 wilful defaulters include another jewellery maker Forever Precious Jewellery, and Vijay Mallya’s Kingsher Airlines.

The stack-up

Punjab National Bank had the highest exposure to Gitanjali Gems with Rs 4,644 crore of non-performing assets (NPA) as on March 2020.

PNB also had Rs 1,447 crore exposure to Gili India and Rs 1,109 crore to Nakshatra Brands.

State Bank of India had Rs 1,875 crore dues from top 10 wilful defaulter ABG Shipyard with the bank writing o the entire amount. Uco Bank had Rs 1,970 crore exposure to REI Agro with half of it being written off.

Write-offs are accounting entries for shifting NPAs from the active balance sheet to off-balance-sheet accounts. These are backed by 100% provision and therefore any recovery from these accounts adds to net profit.

RBI collects credit data from banks monthly, with data on defaults being collected on a weekly basis. The regulator has mandated banks to provide fully against NPAs older than four years and allowed to write these old NPAs.

Subscribe to ETBFSI Daily Newsletter and stay updated.
https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/etnewsletter.php



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI puts up for sale NPA account MSP Metallics, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SBI has put up for sale non-performing asset (NPA) account MSP Metallics Ltd against which a total of 10 banks have collective loan outstanding of over Rs 1,493 crore. State Bank of India (SBI) has the highest share of lending (37.19 per cent) to MSP Metallics amounting to Rs 555.51 crore.

The other lenders to the company as part of the consortium arrangement are — Indian Bank (Rs 284.82 crore); Punjab National Bank (Rs 229.83 crore); UCO Bank (Rs 176.53 crore); Indian Overseas Bank (Rs 73.56 crore); Canara Bank (Rs 62.66 crore); Central Bank of India (Rs 41.91 crore); Union Bank of India (Rs 38.06 crore); Bank of Baroda (Rs 28.02 crore) and Bank of India (Rs 2.84 crore).

The total outstanding against all the 10 lenders stands at Rs 1,493.74 crore. The reserve price has been set at Rs 350 crore.

“In terms of the bank’s policy on sale of financial assets, in line with the regulatory guidelines, we place the…accounts for sale to ARCs/ Banks/ NBFCs/ FIs, on the terms and conditions indicated there against,” SBI said in a sale notice on its website.

The e-auction for MSP Metallics account is to take place on May 4, 2021.

SBI said the sale will be subject to final approval of the other banks who are part of the consortium lending.

“The interested ARCs/banks/NBFCs/FIs can conduct due diligence of these assets with immediate effect, after submitting expression of interest and executing a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with the bank,” SBI said.

The sale is on ‘as is where is basis’.

MSP Metallics runs an integrated steel plant at Marakuta, Jharsuguda district in Odisha.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Govt appoints Anil Kumar Sharma on central board of SBI with immediate effect, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Apr 14 () State Bank of India on Wednesday said the government has nominated Anil Kumar Sharma, the executive director of the RBI, on its board with immediate effect. Citing a Department of Financial Services (DFS) notification dated April 13, 2021, SBI said, “..the central government hereby nominates Anil Kumar Sharma, executive director, Reserve Bank of India as director on the central board of State Bank of India with immediate effect… until further orders, vice Chandan Sinha.”

SBI’s central board of directors comprises a total of 13 members, headed by its chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara, as per its website. KPM MKJ MKJ

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank employees seek to reduce banking hours, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AHMEDABAD: Members of Maha Gujarat Bank Employees’ Association (MGBEA) on Tuesday made a representation before the state level bankers’ committee (SLBC) seeking to reduce banking hours in the wake of the steep surge in Covid-19 cases.

“All branches can reduce business hours from 10am to 2pm and provide essential services only. Employees should be allowed to go home after the business hours. The purpose is to reduce the exposure of the staff with public,” mentioned a statement released by MGBEA.

In the wake of the prevailing situation in Gujarat, MGBEA has requested the head of SLBC and the state government to issue guideline to banks.

“Bank branches will be vulnerable points for transmission of Coronavirus. Nearly 10,000 bank employees are tested positive in March 2021. Across Gujarat, some 3,718 branches of nationalised banks along with 1,286 branches of State Bank of India and 1,619 of district and state cooperative banks in addition to 769 branches of gramin bank and 2,206 private bank branch have been operational full time,” said Janak Rawal, general secretary, MGBEA.

“After the hearing of a Suo moto public interest litigation on the Covid-19 surge, Gujarat Government issued some guideline related to Covid-control in Gujarat and allowed government offices to work with 50% staff. We have represented the matter before SLBC, Gujarat and to the chief secretary, Gujarat government to issue guideline for the functioning of banks branches in the state,” Rawal further added.

Bank should be advised to work with reduced staff strength which will be helpful to the employees as well as to the bank in implementing business continuity plan, according to MGBEA. “The banks must close the branch for 48 hours, if any employee tests positive for Covid-19.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How SBI is readying a big SME lending push, grow loan book to Rs 4 lakh crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After crossing Rs 5 lakh crore in home loans, State Bank of India has set a similar target for the small and medium enterprises (SME) segment.

The bank plans to increase its SME market share to t 20% from 15% at present and grow its loan book to Rs 4 lakh crore in three years, according to a report.

How the bank plans to do it

State Bank of India plans to revamp its entire operational setup for lending to micro, small and medium enterprises to improve turnaround time and customer experience while keeping bad loans under a lid. It is seeking bids from consultants for the process.

In the request-for-proposal (RFP) dated March 26, the bank said “With the objective of becoming banker of choice for MSMEs, SBI intends to improve existing processes and structure in the SME space for achieving improvement in market share/enhance the portfolio while ensuring the asset quality,” SBI said.

The document said that the bank is looking to increase its market share in this category from 15%.

The bank wants to increase onboarding in its Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE), which is seeing poor offtake and high non-performing assets. It is looking to develop analytics tools to generate supply chain financing business from its existing current account (CA) base.

The segments

The bank lends to MSMEs under four verticals — SME Centre and relationship managers, supply chain finance, CGTMSE and cluster financing.

According to the RFQ, for the supply chain finance (SCF) vertical, SBI is looking to benchmark current dealer/vendor financing SCF journeys with global players and identify gaps. It wants to develop value chain analytics capabilities, including an analytics framework on the lack of transaction flows of the existing current account base to generate leads for vendor and dealer onboarding.

For the CGTMSE segment, the bank wants to under the reasons for the poor offtake of schemes and is seeking remedial measures. It wants to identify deficiencies while onboarding that could hurt asset quality.

At the SME centre, the bank is looking to identify gaps in the end-to-end process of loan origination, sanction and monitoring and propose changes in process flow and end-to-end digitisation specific to loans up to Rs 1 crore. It wants to reduce the turnaround time and improve on-boarding. To enable the relationship manager (RM), the bank wants to benchmark the digital offerings of RMs of peers and identify areas of data obtention that can be digitised and centralised.

In cluster financing, the bank wants to build a coordination mechanism with various government agencies for increased thrust in the cluster portfolio. The bank is also looking at tie-up with new fintech firms.

SBI has 1,770 relationship managers to cater to the MSME segment. It has more than 1,100 specialised SME intensive and MSME branches.

Subscribe to ETBFSI Daily Newsletter and stay updated.
https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/etnewsletter.php



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Study, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Several banks, including State Bank of India (SBI), have been imposing excessive charges on certain services provided to poor persons having zero-balance or Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts (BSBDA), a study by the IIT-Bombay has revealed.

The study observed that the SBI’s decision to levy a charge of Rs 17.70 for every debit transaction beyond four by the BSBDA account holders cannot be considered as “reasonable.”

It highlighted that the imposition of service charges resulted in undue collections to the tune of over Rs 300 crore from among nearly 12 crore Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account (BSBDA) holders of SBI during the period 2015-20.

India’s second-largest public sector lender Punjab National Bank, which has 3.9 crore BSBD accounts, collected Rs 9.9 crore during the same period.

“There had been systematic breach in the RBI regulations on BSBDAs by few banks, most notably by the SBI that hosts the maximum number of BSBDAs, when it charged @ Rs 17.70 for every debit transaction (even via digital means) beyond four a month.

“This imposition of service charges resulted in undue collections to the tune of over Rs 300 crore from among nearly 12 crore BSBDA holders of SBI during the period 2015-20, of which the period 2018-19 alone saw a collection of Rs 72 crore and the period 2019-20, Rs 158 crore,” the study by IIT Bombay professor Ashish Das stated.

Levying of charges on BSBDA is guided by September 2013 RBI guidelines. As per the direction these accounts holders are ‘allowed more than four withdrawals’ in a month, at the bank’s discretion provided the bank does not charge for the same.

“While defining the features of a BSBDA, the regulatory requirements made it amply clear that in addition to mandatory free banking services (that included four withdrawals per month), as long as the savings deposit account is a BSBDA, banks cannot impose any charge even for value-added banking services that a bank may like to offer at their discretion,” the study said.

The RBI considers a withdrawal, beyond four a month, a value-added service, it said.

“We assess the dereliction in SBI’s duty towards the PMJDY when the BSBDA users were unduly (and against the extant regulations) forced to part with such high charges for their day-to-day (noncash) digital debit transactions that the bank allowed in a BSBDA,” it said.

SBI, in breach of RBI regulations set forth as early as 2013, had been charging the BSBDA holders for every debit transaction beyond four a month, it said, adding, the charges were as high as Rs 17.70 even for digital transactions like NEFT, IMPS, UPI, BHIM-UPI and debit cards for merchant payments.

“On the one hand, the country strongly promoted digital means of payments, while on the other hand, SBI discouraged these very people, to transact digitally for their day-to-day expenditures, by charging an exploitative Rs 17.70 per digital transaction. This dwarfed the spirit of financial inclusion,” it said.

The RBI’s nonchalant attitude to supervise its own regulations encouraged other banks to become unreasonable towards charges beyond four debits a month, it said.

For example, it said, effective January 1, 2021, IDBI Bank’s Board of Directors considered it reasonable to impose a service charge of Rs 20 for every non-cash digital debit (including UPI/BHIM-UPI/IMPS/NEFT and debit card use for merchant payments).

Even ATM cash withdrawals come at an exorbitant fee of Rs 40. Needless to mention that the bank also imposes a debit freeze beyond 10 debits a month by IDBI Bank.

“Although not by intent, but in practice RBI has allowed victimisation of these BSBDA customers despite being duty-bound to protect them. Two of its specialised departments – the ‘Consumer Education and Protection Department’ and the ‘Financial Inclusion and Development Department’ – allowed this to continue over years even though RBI regulations for “ensuring reasonableness of service charges” were in place,” the study claimed.

When SBI charged for every UPI/BHIM-UPI and RuPay digital payments though RBI was approached first to address the same under extant laws, it remained silent, the study said, adding it was the government, which when subsequently approached, that came forward to instruct the banks (on August 30, 2020), to retrospectively (since January 1, 2020) return the money to the depositors or face penal consequences.

Despite this respite, the RBI still needs to ensure compliance of its own regulations when SBI still considers itself compliant while charging as high as Rs 17.70 for every digital debit transaction, through means other than UPI/BHIM-UPI and RuPay-digital, carried out since January 2020.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 16 17 18 19 20 23