Banks’ exposure to better-rated large borrowers declining, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that exposure of banks to better-rated large borrowers is declining, while signs of stress are being witnessed in the MSME and retail sectors.

Within the domestic financial system, credit flow from banks and capital expenditure of corporates remains muted, said a report by the central bank.

“While banks’ exposures to better rated large borrowers are declining, there are incipient signs of stress in the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and retail segments,” said the recently released Financial Stability Report for July 2021.

Further, the demand for consumer credit across banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) has dampened, with some deterioration in the risk profile of retail borrowers becoming evident.

As per the report, macro stress tests indicate that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of scheduled commercial banks (SCB) may increase from 7.48 per cent in March 2021 to 9.80 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario.

In case of a severe stress scenario, the GNPA may rise to 11.22 per cent, although SCBs have sufficient capital, both at the aggregate and individual level, even under stress.

Further, the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) increased to 16.03 per cent and the provisioning coverage ratio (PCR) stood at 68.86 per cent in March 2021.

In his foreword for the report, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said that the sustained policy support along with further strengthening of capital buffers by banks and other financial institutions remain vital amid the Covid-19 pandemic.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Airtel Payments Bank hopeful of break-even in FY22; logs surge in biz volumes amid pandemic, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: Airtel Payments Bank has seen a surge in business volumes in FY21 as lockdown curbs and migrants heading back to villages spurred new accounts as well as transactions, and the company is eyeing a break-even this fiscal, a top official said. Factors like growth in revenues, expanded scale of operations, and higher realisation per user from cross selling of products are expected to drive break-even in the current financial year.

The pandemic and subsequent lockdown curbs fuelled uptake as customers, both in rural interiors and urban cities, sought banking solutions closer home, opting for convenient and secure digital payment options. The bank witnessed a strong traction for its diversified product offerings such digital payments, money transfers, insurance, direct benefit transfer credits, Aadhaar-enabled payment system and collection management services.

A senior company official, who did not wish to be named, said Airtel Payments Bank is “confident” of a break-even this year, having reached the “right level of scale” with its large base of users.

A mail sent to the company did not elicit a response.

Meanwhile, the official said the company has build an adequate infrastructure, backed by investments in technology, to serve consumers and hence fixed costs and incremental investments are expected to remain in check.

The current user base of 5.5 crore reflects a large distributed cost base across customers for the company, the official said noting that the losses too have nearly halved in Q4 of FY21, compared to the year ago period.

Losses for full year FY21 were at about Rs 420 crore, while the fourth quarter losses stood at nearly Rs 70 crore. The company logged over 32 per cent growth in revenue at almost Rs 627 crore for FY21 from Rs 474 crore in previous fiscal.

COVID induced movement restrictions and curfews in different parts of the country had made it difficult for those living in villages as also migrants returning to their hometowns, to access conventional bank branches located some distance away to withdraw money.

Airtel Payments Bank – which has one of largest retail networks with over 500,000 neighbourhood banking points – saw marked increase in new accounts opening during the FY21, as transactions too rose, the company official said. At present, one in six villages in the country is being served by Airtel Payments Bank.

The company expects the digital payment momentum to continue, even accelerate in coming times, the official said.

Earlier this year, Airtel Payments Bank announced its customers will get an increased interest rate of six per cent per annum on savings account deposit of over Rs 1 lakh. The move, announced in May this year, followed Airtel Payments Bank becoming the first payments bank to implement an enhanced day-end savings limit of Rs 2 lakh, as per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines. The interest rate is at 2.5 per cent per annum for a deposit up to Rs 1 lakh.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How can risk management professionals switch between banking & insurance?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Life insurance and the banking sector are the two core sectors where customers keep money with the trust that their money is safe. Both the sectors protect the customer’s money. This article looks at both the assets and liabilities of the banking and insurance sector to find out the similarities and differences. The article also looks at the risks of both sectors to find whether there are opportunities for cross-pollination of people working from both sides.

In both sectors, customers place their money with the respective institutions such as banks and insurance companies. In the banking sector, deposited money creates liability to be returned upon withdrawal. Similarly, in the insurance sector, the premium received creates liability which is paid when a claim arises (death, maturity, and surrender). So, money placed by customers in both sectors creates liability.

Safer asset creation accords secured returns

On the other hand, the money collected by both institutions is invested to back the liabilities which create assets. Under the insurance sector, the money received in the form of a premium is used to purchase the assets like government securities, corporate bonds, equities, and other assets. These assets so purchased to match the amount and tenure of liabilities.

In the banking sector, the money deposited by customers is used to create assets in the form of Government securities, corporate bonds, and equities while other assets are created by giving loans. The bank charges a higher rate of interest from the loanee compared to the depositor to meet expenses and profit margin.

Both the institutions take credit risk by investing to back their liabilities. In the insurance sector, investments are highly regulated with a high percentage of investment in Government bonds and a relatively lower percentage in corporate bonds, and even lesser in equities, thereby having relatively lower credit risk from the point of the probability of default. On the other hand, in banks, most of the assets are created by giving loans to individuals and institutions subject to higher default risk, thereby they have high credit risk. The mechanism of the creation of credit risk under both institutions is similar.

Managing the risk of liquidity

Liquidity risk in the banking sector is a key risk from the customer’s deposit point of view, that is, customers to be paid on demand. Therefore, the banks in India are to maintain a certain Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR). The money kept under CRR may be used to pay when the demand arises from bank customers. The CRR is the ratio of cash required to keep as a reserve as a percentage of total deposits. This cash is either stored in the bank’s vault or deposited with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on which no interest payment is made. The current CRR is 4% of Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL). This money cannot be used for investment and lending.

One of the applications of CRR is to control inflation as high CRR will reduce the amount available for lending in a form of loan thereby reducing banks’ liquidity leading to reduced circulation of money in the economy.

Similar to CRR, another tool used to manage the liquidity in the banking system is the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) is the minimum percentage of deposits (NDTL) that is to be invested in gold, cash, and other securities. These deposits are kept with banks and not with RBI. The current SLR is 18%.

Similar to CRR, SLR is also used to trap the circulation of money in the economy which can control inflation. Also, SLR is used to control the ability of the banks to lend; higher SLR would restrict bank’s ability to give loans.

The restrictions applied in the banking system in a form of CRR and SLR helps in managing the liquidity position of the banks to enable payment to depositors. Similarly, in the insurance sector, to enable the payment of claims, the regulator has prescribed a very strict investment norm with a high percentage of investment in government bonds for the security of money. Such investment in government bonds can be easily liquidated to help maintain liquidity in the insurance sector. Both the sectors use the same methodology of either cash flows or liquidity coverage ratio to assess the liquidity position along with stress tests to identify higher requirements of liquid cash.

In the banking sector, CRR and SLR act like a reserve to be used when required paying to customers on increase in withdrawals, similarly, in the insurance sector, insurance companies are to keep reserves to pay claims when arises. These reserves are calculated at prudential assumption based on guidelines given by the insurance regulator. Such reserves are to be invested based on the regulatory investment guidelines. The purpose of the reserve is to meet the customer’s claims when they arise. In both sectors, there are prudential norms to safeguard the money of the customers in meeting liabilities.

There is a similar inherent mechanism under both the banking and insurance sector to protect the customer’s money, managing the credit and liquidity risk. There can be opportunities for cross-pollination of skills between the two sectors. Actuaries are very strong on the liability side while banking folks are strong on the asset side, an amalgamation is possible.

The blog has been authored by
Sonjai Kumar, Certified Risk Management Professional from IRM London

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI warns against combination of high public debt, low interest rates, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: As economies around the world witness ultra-low interest rates and rising public debt amid the pandemic, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that the combination would pose challenges.

The pandemic response saw a tight interaction of monetary and fiscal policy. As monetary policy has sought to control a larger segment of the yield curve, the overlap with public debt management has grown, noted RBI’s Financial Stability Report for July.

It noted that with monetary policy committed to an easy stance for some time in many countries, the fiscal stance becomes important.

Too loose a fiscal stance could cause inflation surprises and financial conditions could tighten, it said, adding that a more constrained fiscal policy would add pressure on monetary policy.

“It would test the efficacy of further monetary expansion and could heighten intertemporal tradeoffs,” it said.

The extraordinary combination of high debt-to-GDP ratios and ultra-low interest rates raises three challenges, said the central bank’s report, with the first being the risk of fiscal dominance.

Further, it may also lead to a situation where fiscal positions may ultimately prove unsustainable and the complications of the possible joint “normalisation” of fiscal and monetary policies would also crop.

Growth-friendly fiscal policy, the RBI suggested, can help by effectively targeting public infrastructure and productivity.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


About 15.9% of loans less than Rs 25 crore to the MSME sector for public sector banks has turned bad as of March 2021, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

This was against an NPA ratio of 13.1% at the end of December 2020 and 18.2% at the end of March 2020. Loans due past zero days and 30 days also rose significantly to 60.7% and 10.6% respectively.

On the other hand private sector lenders recorded NPA ratio of 3.6% at the end of March 2021 against 2% at the end of December 2020 and 4.3% at the end of March. Loans due beyond zero days and 30 days also rose by 89.6% and 3.7% respectively.

As of February 2021, 80% of the MSME borrowers moved into high-risk category as per data released by the regulator.

MSMEs worst hit

The medium, Micro and Small Enterprises are among the worst hit and they face enormous stress in meeting their payment obligations, the Reserve Bank of India said in its latest edition of the Financial Stability Report.

“Despite the restructuring, however, stress in the MSME portfolio of PSBs remains high,” the regulator noted. “While PSBs have actively resorted to restructuring under all the schemes, participation by PVBs was significant only in the COVID-19 restructuring scheme offered in August 2020,” RBI said.

“Given the elevated level of debt of the stressed cohort, the implications of business disruptions following the resurgence of the pandemic could be significant,” the RBI said

The restructuring

Since 2019, weakness in the MSME portfolio of banks and NBFCs has drawn regulatory attention, with the Reserve Bank permitting restructuring of temporarily impaired MSME loans (of size up to Rs 25 crore) under three schemes.

As per data with the RBI, the banking industry together restructured loans worth Rs 36,000 crore under the August 2020 Covid loan restructuring scheme. Public sector banks held the lions share at Rs 24,816 crore while private banks recast MSME loans worth Rs 11,027 crore.

In contrast to this PSBs have been laggards in lending to this sector with aggregate MSME exposure growing at a paltry 0.89% in the last fiscal year ended March 2020. For private lenders this exposure grew 9.23% during the same time.

“Growth in credit to MSMEs during 2020-21 was aided by the ECLGS scheme, with aggregate sanctions at Rs 2.46 lakh crore at the end of February 2021,” RBI noted. “For Public sector banks credit to the sector remained flat and new disbursements turned negative, after adjusting for interest accretion on past loans; private banks on the other hand, showed relatively robust increase in exposure.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI tweaks norms for interest on unclaimed amount after deposit matures, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday tweaked the norms for interest on the amount left unclaimed with the bank after a term deposit matures.

Currently, if a term deposit matures and the proceeds are unpaid, the amount left unclaimed with the bank attracts the rate of interest as applicable to savings deposits.

“On a review, it has been decided that if a term deposit (TD) matures and proceeds are unpaid, the amount left unclaimed with the bank shall attract the rate of interest as applicable to a savings account or the contracted rate of interest on the matured TD, whichever is lower,” the RBI said in a circular.

The new norms are applicable for deposits in all commercial banks, small finance banks, local area banks, and cooperative banks.

Term deposit refers to an interest-bearing deposit received by the bank for a fixed period. It also includes deposits such as recurring, cumulative, annuity, reinvestment deposits, and cash certificates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI worried over growing clout of Amazon, Google and Facebook in financial services in India, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As Amazons and Googles line up expansion in financial services in India, the Reserve Bank of India has expressed concerns over their presence.

Big Tech is a term used for the five most dominant information technology firms in the world —Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft—that have market capitalisation ranging between $1 trillion and $2 trillion, each.

“Big Techs offer a wide range of digital financial services…of several advanced and emerging market economies. While this holds the promise of supporting financial inclusion and generating lasting efficiency gains, including by encouraging the competitiveness of banks, important policy issues arise. Specifically, concerns have intensified around a level playing field with banks, operational risk, too-big-to-fail issues, challenges for antitrust rules, cybersecurity and data privacy,” RBI said in its Financial Stability Report.

Big techs present at least three unique challenges. First, they straddle many different (non-financial) lines of business with sometimes opaque overarching governance structures. Second, they have the potential to become dominant players in financial services.

Third, big techs are generally able to overcome limits to scale in financial services provision by exploiting network effects. it said. Interestingly, the RBI concern comes at a time when the government is engaged in a tussle with the companies over media rules.

For central banks and financial regulators, financial stability objectives may be best pursued by blending activity and entity-based prudential regulation of big techs. An activity-based approach is already applied in areas such as anti-money laundering [AML] /combating the financing of terrorism; an activity-based approach is the provision of cloud services, where minimising operational and in particular, cyber risk is paramount, it said. Furthermore, as the digital economy expands across borders, international coordination of rules and standards becomes more pressing, it said.

Growing Big Tech clout

Facebook, Apple, Google and Amazon are leveraging their huge user bases to push their financial services. With consumer user data at hand, these companies can use it to curate personal financial products for them. which entered Indian fintech market in 2016 with Amazon Pay, has taken several strides. It has partnered ICICI Bank to issue credit cards, become a part of the Indian government’s payment network through the Amazon Pay UPI, launched insurance services, and entered into the digital gold space.

Google has partnered Wise and Western Union to enter the $470 billion remittance market under which Google users in the US can send money in Inda.

Also Read: BigTech and Cyber are the major risks for Banks and FIs: Sopnendu Mohanty, MAS



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Now, Indian crypto exchanges hit by payment processors pullout, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Just as they were breathing easy with the Reserve Bank of India clarifying that banks can do due diligence of crypto clients, Indian crypto exchanges have been hit by another hurdle.

With the RBI reiterating that it does not favour cryptocurrencies, major payment gateways have pulled out hitting transactions.

Customer complaints have inundated all India’s key exchanges as the pullout by major payment gateways, including Razorpay, PayU and BillDesk has hit transactions, according to social media and users.

The options

Options being resorted to including tying up with smaller payment gateways, building their own payment processors, holding back on immediate settlements or offering only peer-to-peer transactions.

At least two exchanges have tied up with smaller payment processing firm, Airpay, as its larger peers have cut ties.

Some crypto exchanges, such as WazirX, are forced to stick only to peer-to-peer transactions on certain days, while others, such as Vauld, allow bank transfers with manual settlement as they hunt for a payment processor, backing up settlements.

Smaller payment gateways have not proved very successful in executing high volumes of transactions, leading to failures that have resulted in a flood of user complaints.

Others, such as Bitbns, have built their own basic payment processor, allowing some essential transactions since the systems do not require prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, the central bank.

A grey area

Despite the boom, cryptocurrencies are in a grey area in India, with the Reserve Bank hostile towards it and the government unsure about its prospects.

There is no legislation or regulatory code yet to govern the crypto ecosystem, leading to confusion among customers, businesses and financial institutions providing banking services.

In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India barred financial institutions from supporting crypto transactions, which the Supreme Court overturned in 2020. The government has circulated a draft bill outlawing all cryptocurrency activities, which has been under discussion since 2019.

Last month, the RBI asked banks not to cite its 2018 circular and clarified that banks can do their own KYC for crypto clients. With this, banks are now reassessing the situation, but several banks currently lack the technical expertise to make a supervisory assessment on these transactions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks tank up on capital but corporate loan demand is missing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank credit growth to the industrial sector decelerated 0.8% year-to-date as of May 21, 2021, due to poor loan offtake from the corporate sector.

It slowed the non-food credit growth to 5.9 per cent in May 2021, as compared to 6.1 per cent in the year-ago month, RBI data showed.

On the other hand, personal loans registered an accelerated growth of 12.4 per cent in May 2021, as compared to 10.6 per cent a year ago, primarily due to accelerated growth in vehicle loans and credit card outstanding.

What’s up?

Corporates are preferring to deleverage debt and waiting it out for the pandemic to end before committing any new capital expenditure. They are retiring high-cost bank loans by tapping the bond markets where funds are available for cheaper rates.

Banks anticipate a loan demand surge from retail as the pandemic ebbs in the year ahead. However, the corporate loan demand is not yet on horizon.

Loans to industry

Loans to industries were 1.7% higher on year as of May 22, 2020, according to data on sectoral deployment of bank loans in May released by the Reserve Bank of India.

The RBI said that the fall in loans extended to industries was mainly because credit to large industries contracted by 1.7% compared to a growth of 2.8% a year ago.

However, credit to medium industries registered a robust growth of 45.8% compared to 5.3% in the previous year, and those to micro and small industries registered a growth of 5.0% versus a contraction of 3.4%.

Within the industrial sector, mining and quarrying, food processing, textiles, gems and jewellery, wood and wood products, paper and paper products, glass and glassware, infrastructure, leather and leather products, rubber, as well as plastic and plastic products registered higher growth in May.

On the other hand, credit to beverages and tobacco, petroleum coal products and nuclear fuels, vehicles, vehicle parts and transport equipment, basic metal and metal products, cement and cement products, all engineering, chemicals and chemical products and construction decelerated, RBI said in a release.

Fiscal 2021

Growth in credit to the private corporate sector, however, declined for the sixth successive quarter in the fourth quarter of the last fiscal and its share in total credit stood at 28.3 per cent. RBI said the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on outstanding credit has moderated by 91 basis points during 2020-21, including a decline of 21 basis points in Q4.

Overall credit growth in India slowed down in FY21 to 5.6 per cent from 6.4 per cent in FY20 as the economy was hit hard by Covid. and subsequent lockdowns.

Credit growth to the industrial sector remained in the negative territory during 2020-21, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdowns. Industrial loan growth, on the other hand, remained negative during all quarters of 2020-21.”

The RBI further said working capital loans in the form of cash credit, overdraft and demand loans, which accounted for a third of total credit, contracted during 2020-21, indicating the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Shift to bonds

The corporate world focused on deleveraging high-cost loans through fundraising via bond issuances despite interest rates at an all-time low. This has led to muted credit growth for banks.

Corporates raised Rs 2.1 lakh crore in December ended quarter and Rs 3.1 lakh crore in the fourth quarter from the corporate bond markets. In contrast, the corresponding year-ago figures were Rs 1.5 lakh crore and Rs 1.9 lakh crore, respectively.

Bonds were mostly raised by top-rated companies at 150-200 basis points below bank loans. Most of the debt was raised by government companies as they have top-rated status.

For AAA-rated corporate bonds, the yield was 6.85 per cent in May 2020, which fell to 5.38 per cent in April 2021 and to 5.16 per cent in May 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI report, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) ratio of banks may rise to 9.8 per cent by March 2022, under a baseline scenario, from 7.48 per cent in March 2021, according to the Financial Stability Report (FSR) released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Under a severe stress scenario, GNPA of banks may increase to 11.22 per cent, the report released on Thursday showed.

“Macro stress tests indicate that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of banks may increase from 7.48 per cent in March 2021 to 9.80 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario,” the report said.

It, however, added that banks have sufficient capital, both at the aggregate and individual level, even under stress.

The FSR released in January this year had said banks’ GNPAs may rise to 13.5 per cent by September 2021, under the baseline scenario, which would be the highest in over 22 years.

The latest report said within the bank groups, public sector banks’ (PSBs’) GNPA ratio of 9.54 per cent in March 2021 edging up to 12.52 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario is an improvement over earlier expectations and indicative of pandemic proofing by regulatory support.

For private sector banks (PVBs) and foreign banks (FBs), the transition of the GNPA ratio from baseline to medium to severe stress is from 5.82 per cent to 6.04 per cent to 6.46 per cent, and from 4.90 per cent to 5.35 per cent to 5.97 per cent, respectively.

Under the baseline and the two stress scenarios, the system level CRAR (capital to risk assets ratio) holds up well, moderating by 30 basis points (bps) between March 2021 and March 2022 under the baseline scenario and by 130 bps and 256 bps, respectively, under the two stress scenarios.

All 46 banks would be able to maintain CRAR well above the regulatory minimum of 9 per cent as of March 2022 even in the worst-case scenario, it said.

The report said the common equity Tier I (CET-1) capital ratio of banks may decline from 12.78 per cent in March 2021 to 12.58 per cent in March 2022, under the baseline scenario.

It would further fall to 11.76 per cent and 10.73 per cent, respectively, under the medium and severe stress scenarios by March 2022.

The report said Covid-19 has increased the risks to financial stability, especially when the unprecedented measures taken to mitigate the pandemic’s destruction are normalised and rolled back.

“Central banks across the world are bracing up to deal with the expected deterioration in asset quality of banks in view of the impairment to loan servicing capacity among individuals and businesses,” the report said.

The initial assessment of major central banks is that while banks’ financial positions have been shored up, there has been no significant rise in non-performing loans (NPLs) and policy support packages helped in maintaining solvency and liquidity.

The economic recovery, however, remains fragmented and overcast with high uncertainty, it said.

The report also highlighted the stress test results of the pandemic by various central banks.

Bank of England (BoE’s) ‘Desktop’ stress test in the interim FSR (May 2020) had projected that under appropriately prudent assumptions, aggregate CET-1 capital ratio of banks would decrease from 14.8 per cent at end-2019 to 11 per cent by the second year of test scenario (2021) and banks would remain well above their minimum regulatory capital requirements.

As per the latest position, the CET-1 capital ratio increased to 15.8 per cent over the course of 2020, the report showed.

The report further said in its June 2020 stress test and additional analysis in the light of Covid-19, the US Fed found that banks generally had strong levels of capital, but considerable economic uncertainty remained.

It projected that under severely adverse scenario, the CET-1 ratio of large banks would decline from an average starting point of 12 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 10.3 per cent in first quarter of 2022.

However, CET-1 ratio for large banks increased to 13 per cent as at end-2020, as per the latest position of stress test of the US Federal Reserve.

Similarly, in its Covid-19 vulnerability analysis results (June 2020) for 86 banks comprising about 80 per cent of total assets in the Euro area, the European Central Bank (ECB) estimated that banks’ aggregate CET-1 ratio would deplete by 1.9 percentage points to 12.6 per cent under the central scenario, and by 5.7 percentage points to 8.8 per cent under the severe scenario by end-2022.

As per the latest position, the CET-1 ratio of Euro area banks on aggregate improved to 15.4 per cent in 2020.

The FSR also conducted the stress tests on banks’ credit concentration — considering top individual borrowers according to their standard exposures.

The test showed that in the extreme scenario of the top three individual borrowers of the banks under consideration failing to repay, no bank will face a situation of fall in CRAR below the regulatory requirement of 9 per cent.

However, 37 banks would experience a decline of more than one percentage point in their CRARs.

Under the extreme scenario of the top three group borrowers in the standard category failing to repay, the worst impacted four banks would have CRARs in the range of 10 to 11 per cent and 39 banks would experience a decline in CRAR of more than one percentage point, the report said.

In the extreme scenario of the top three individual stressed borrowers of these banks failing to repay, a majority of the banks would experience a reduction of 10 to 20 bps only in their CRARs, the report said, adding this will be on account of low level of stressed assets in March 2021.

The report further said despite the pandemic conditions during 2020-21, the GNPA ratio for the non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) sector declined with a more than commensurate fall in the net NPA ratio attesting to higher provisioning, and capital adequacy improved marginally.

The GNPAs of NBFCs stood at 6.4 per cent and net NPAs at 2.7 per cent as of March 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 30 31 32 33 34 55