CA Institute approves revised networking guidelines for firms

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The CA Institute’s central council has approved the revised networking guidelines that would help Indian audit firms to grow big and gain larger assignments in the country. “The guidelines are expected to make it conducive for Indian audit firms to come together,” Nihar Jambusaria, President, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) told BusinessLine.

They were initially framed in 2005 and later revised in 2011. “A group was formed last year to revise the guidelines and make them conducive to enable CA firms to go in for networking, which is much required,” he added.

‘Allotment purpose’

ICAI will now approach regulators like Reserve Bank of India and Comptroller and Auditor General of India to submit that “registered networks within the fold of ICAI should be recognised” by them for the purpose of the allotment of public sector and bank branch audits.

“For public sector audits, it may take some time to recognise such networks. But we will take efforts,” Jambusaria said. It has also been specified in the guidelines that chartered accountants can share their fees with others.

In February this year at the council meeting some changes were suggested to the guidelines and they have now been carried out, he added. These guidelines have already been forwarded to the Corporate Affairs Ministry (MCA).

Meanwhile, the ICAI President also said that separate guidelines have to be framed for networking of domestic firms with foreign firms and a separate group has been set up for this purpose. “During this year itself we will come with guidelines for networking with foreign firms,” he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Award for Esaf Small Finance Bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Esaf Small Finance Bank has been awarded ‘Great Place to Work’ certification by the Great Place to Work Institute.

The certification is the result of an employee survey conducted by the third-party global authority on recognising high-trust and performance culture at workplaces. This recognition acknowledges the bank’s commitment and credibility amongst its employees.

K Paul Thomas, MD and CEO, Esaf Small Finance Bank, said: “Employees are always the pillars behind the success of our organisation. This certification is an honour and true recognition for our continued efforts making every day better for employees. We have always provided our employees the best work atmosphere upholding our brand values. Great Place to Work Institute recognises organisations on multiple parameters. and undergoes a rigorous assessment to arrive at the coveted list of companies.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SC ruling on loan moratorium case a ‘mixed bag’ for borrowers, lenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court’s decision in the loan moratorium case to reject pleas seeking complete waiver of interest during moratorium period has been widely hailed by industry and the legal fraternity, although public sector banks are not entirely enthused about it.

The apex court has also now denied requests seeking extension of moratorium period.

Reacting to the SC ruling, Sanjay Tibrewala, CEO, Phoenix ARC, said: “Supreme Court decision is a welcome one. Complete waiver of interest during the moratorium would have badly hurt the balance sheet of lenders and today’s SC decision was right in denying that. The lenders can now recognise their NPAs and start taking appropriate corrective action for recoveries.”

No compound interest on loan, irrespective of amount, during moratorium, rules SC

Eshwar Karra, CEO-Kotak Special Situations Fund, Kotak Investment Advisors, said, “The SC verdict will throw up a lot of opportunities for special situation funds. A lot of leveraged companies who have asset:liability mismatch will need to re-tenure their existing loans to match their cash flows. Our $1-billion KSSF fund has the flexibility to give customised solutions for such situations.” However, banks will have to take a hit with the SC ruling that the benefit of no interest on interest be extended to all borrowers and not only those who sought moratorium, said a former chief executive of a public sector bank.

Supreme Court verdict: Additional relief of about ₹7,000 crore may have to be given to borrowers

‘Balanced decision’

Anshuman Panwar, Co-Founder, Creditas Solutions, a holistic digital-based debt collection platform, said, “It is a great and balanced decision by the Supreme Court. It ensures the payment culture of retail borrowers remains intact while at the same time providing them relief from the burden of additional interest.”

Siddharth Srivastava, Partner, Khaitan & Co, feels it is a “Very balanced view by apex court. Charging interest on interest would have eventually diluted the relief granted by RBI to ailing borrowers and they may perhaps be worse off than pre-Covid stage. The decision therefore should be welcomed by the borrowers.

Loan moratorium: SC orders full waiver of interest on interest

The apex court has also taken a very prudent view by not granting a complete waiver of interest, which would have severely impacted the banking system. All in all, it is a win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved”.

Jinni Sinha, Partner, IndusLaw, a law firm, said this judgement by the Supreme Court will help corporates, in particular SMEs and MSMEs who were impacted by the pandemic. Waiver of interest on interest will certainly boost these corporates in increasing cash flows and help them meet their operating expenses.

The Supreme Court has also directed to refund the interest already collected, this will have an impact on the balance sheet of the lenders. However, the magnitude of this impact will have to be seen, Sinha added.

‘Shot in the arm’

Jay Parikh, Partner, L&L Partners, said the refusal to extend moratorium and the vacation of the stay on the classification of NPAs by banks is a shot in the arm for the banking sector. On the other hand, the effect of waiver of interest on interest and compound interest will have to be seen, given banks may have declared them as income. On balance, the SC has effectively put to rest the discussions around the moratorium and should provide a lot of clarity to banks, going forward, Parikh said.

Meanwhile, on the SC ruling on NPA standstill issue, Karan Mitroo, Partner, L&L Partners, said the decision of the Supreme Court to vacate the stay on declaration of NPAs will now enable banks to take actions on defaulting borrowers, which will also boost recovery. This will also provide a clearer picture with respect to balance sheets of the banks.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PSB privatisation: UFBU warns of more strikes

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) has decided to undertake further preparatory programmes to go for intermittent strikes, prolonged strikes, and also indefinite strike to protest against the government’s proposal to privatise public sector banks (PSBs).

This comes in the wake of about 10 lakh employees and officers, owing allegiance to nine unions under the aegis of UFBU, going on a two-day strike on March 15 and 16.

“…We must intensify our campaign amongst the people, particularly the beneficiaries and other sections of the people.

“…It was decided to undertake a mass campaign of collection of supportive signatures in the petition to Prime Minister,” said Sanjeev K Bandlish, Convenor, UFBU, in a statement.

UFBU decided to embark upon programmes, including collecting five crore signatures from the people in the Petition to Prime Minister during April, May and June; and organisational meetings at all levels in Aprilto ensure total membership contact.

The forum’s constituents will also hold mass rallies, dharnas, seminars and workshops in all the States in April, May and June.

“We are opposed to privatisation of banks and are convinced that privatisation is not the solution to the problems faced by the banks.

“It is imperative that we should prepare ourselves for a prolonged and sustained struggle and also elicit support from the people,” said Bandlish.

In her Union Budget speech on February 1, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said: “Other than IDBI Bank, we propose to take up the privatisation of two Public Sector Banks and one General Insurance company in the year 2021-22.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Easing of valuation rule for perpetual bonds to help in avoiding panic redemption, feel experts

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Easing of valuation rule for perpetual bonds by Sebi will provide a breather to the mutual fund industry, which has an exposure of over ₹35,000 crore to such instruments, as they get time to redeem their positions, industry experts said on Tuesday.

They further said there will be no panic redemption in these bonds with this temporary relief.

However, experts differ on views whether the move will help banks, which raise capital through such bond issuances.

In a late evening circular on Monday, the Sebi eased valuation rule pertaining to perpetual bonds.

The move came after the finance ministry had asked Sebi to withdraw its directive to mutual fund houses to treat additional tier-1 (AT-1) bonds as having maturity of 100 years as it could disrupt the market and impact capital raising by banks.

AT-1 bonds

AT-1 bonds are considered perpetual in nature, similar to equity shares as per the Basel-III guidelines. They form part of the tier-I capital of banks.

Under the new rule, the deemed residual maturity of Basel-III additional tier-1 (AT-1) bonds will be 10 years until March 31, 2022, and would be increased to 20 and 30 years over the subsequent six-month period.

From April 2023 onwards, the residual maturity of AT-1 bonds will become 100 years from the date of issuance of the bonds.

Green Portfolio co-founder Divam Sharma said the new framework will provide some relief to mutual funds as they get time to redeem their positions, which are generally not liquid. There will be no panic redemption in these bonds with this temporary relief.

No relief to banks

For banks, this latest circular does not provide much relief as they are likely to find it difficult to get investors for their AT-1 bonds, he added.

“There is no change/deferment in the imposition of the 10 per cent capping of ownership of bonds in a particular mutual fund, which might have an immediate impact on the bond yields,” he added.

Gopal Kavalireddi, head of research at FYERS, said the move would provide a breather to the mutual fund AMCs, which already have a total exposure of ₹35,000 crore, and also provide relief to banks which raise capital through such bond issuances.

Omkeshwar Singh, head (RankMF) at Samco Group, the deem maturity has been changed in phased manner for valuation of perpetual bonds exiting by Sebi.

Effective from April 1, 2023, onwards, the deemed maturity to be considered 100 years and in between, it will be 10, 20 and 30 years in three phases till March 31, 2022, September 30, 2022, and March 31, 2023, respectively.

“These two years in between will provide sufficient time for funds to align there investments into AT-1 bonds (perpetual) , and the sudden shock in net asset value (NAV) can be avoided in the schemes that have exposure to these bonds,” Singh noted.

Harshad Chetanwala, co-founder of MyWealthGrowth.com, said the recent amendments in valuation rule of perpetual bonds will still have an impact on the overall duration of the debt fund portfolios and will increase their sensitivity to interest rate changes.

“Longer the duration, higher will be the sensitivity to interest rate changes. The revaluation could impact the portfolio’s value and reduce the NAVs of the mutual fund scheme holding these instruments in their portfolio,” he added.

As per Sebi, deemed residual maturity of Basel-III Tier-2 bonds would be considered 10 years or contractual maturity, whichever is earlier, until March 2022. After that, it will be in accordance with the contractual maturity.

Further, if the issuer does not exercise call option for any bond then the valuation will be done considering maturity of 100 years from the date of issuance for AT-1 bonds and contractual maturity for Tier-2 bonds, for all bonds of the issuer, Sebi said.

In addition, if the non-exercise of call option is due to the financial stress of the issuer or if there is any adverse news, the same need to be reflected in the valuation, it added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PAG invests ₹2,366 crore in Edelweiss Wealth Management

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Edelweiss Group and PAG, on Tuesday, announced an investment of about ₹2,366 crore by PAG in Edelweiss Wealth Management (EWM).

“This partnership will result in unlocking long-term value for shareholders and accelerating business growth,” it said in a statement, adding that PAG has made an investment of about ₹2,366 crore in EWM, including primary and secondary investment.

“In addition, PAG is also acquiring the entire ownership of the prior investors in EWM, Kora Management and Sanaka Capital, taking its stake to about 61.5 per cent,” it said.

Edelweiss will continue to hold about 38.5 per cent stake in EWM as earlier envisaged, with the option to increase it further to up to about 44 per cent.

Demerger

PAG and Edelweiss will work together towards demerger and the eventual listing of the business.

“PAG’s primary capital infusion into the wealth business will further strengthen the equity base and provide growth capital,” the statement said, adding that it also provides the Edelweiss Group with with growth capital.

“The focus will be on strengthening the leadership position in businesses such as alternatives asset management and asset reconstruction while further enhancing the retail expansion through housing credit, SME credit, life and general insurance and mutual funds,” it further said.

In August 2020, PAG and Edelweiss had announced the strategic investment for a 51 per cent stake sale in EWM.

“Our focus will continue to be on enhancing the value of the franchise while simultaneously exploring avenues to unlock this value for the shareholders,” said Rashesh Shah, Chairman and CEO, Edelweiss Group.

Nikhil Srivastava, Partner and Managing Director, Head of India Private Equity, PAG, said: “We look forward to leveraging PAG’s global experience to drive innovation and transformation to further strengthen EWM’s market position and create long-term value for all stakeholders.”

EWM comprises wealth management and capital markets business. It reported revenue of ₹880 crore and net profit of ₹180 crore for the nine months of the current fiscal.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Loan moratorium: SC orders full waiver of interest on interest

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government may have to provide relief of about ₹7,000-7,500 crore to borrowers having loan exposure of over ₹2 crore as the Supreme Court, on Tuesday, ruled that all borrowers will be eligible for waiver of interest on interest in respect of pandemic-related loan moratorium.

The government has already picked up the tab towards waiver of interest on interest for loans up to ₹2 crore, irrespective of whether moratorium was availed or not, following the top court’s order in October 2020. This cost the exchequer was about ₹6,500 crore.

Anil Gupta, Vice-President – Financial Sector Ratings, ICRA, said: “As per our estimates, the compounded interest for six months of moratorium across all lenders is estimated at ₹13,500-14,000 crore.

“The government had already announced relief for borrowers having borrowings up to ₹2 crore, which was estimated to cost about ₹6,500 crore to the exchequer.”

Additional relief

With the announcement of waiver for all borrowers, the additional relief of about ₹7,000-7,500 crore will need to be provided to borrowers, he said.

The apex court, on Tuesday, also vacated its September 3, 2020, interim order that directed lenders that accounts that were not declared as NPA till August 31, 2020, shall not be declared as NPA till further orders.

As per ICRA’s estimates, on a proforma basis (taking into account the apex court’s direction that accounts that were not declared as NPA till August 31, 2020 shall not be declared as NP A till further orders), the Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPAs) of banks stood at ₹8.7-lakh crore, or 8.3 per cent of advances, against the reported GNPA of ₹7.4 lakh (7.1 per cent) as on December 31, 2020.

Also, on a proforma basis, the Net NPA (NNPA) for banks stood at ₹2.7-lakh crore or 2.7 per cent of advances against the reported NNPA for all banks of ₹1.7-lakh crore (1.7 per cent) as on December 31, 2020.

Hence, in the absence of standstill by the Supreme Court, the Gross NPAs for banks would have been higher by ₹1.3-lakh crore (1.2 per cent) and Net NPAs higher by ₹1.0-lakh crore (1.0 per cent).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Digital lenders on fund raising spree

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Concerns about the sector notwithstanding, the digital lending segment is seeing a boom with increased demand for easy credit from customers and fund raise by many of these firms.

Over the last few months, many of these lenders have raised funds for penetrating deeper into the country and launching new products and more such firms are expected to raise funds in coming weeks.

Digital lenders including IndiaLends, KreditBee and True Balance (for its lending arm -True Credits) have raised funds via equity as well as debt in recent weeks.

Easy credit

Easier availability of credit through these lenders has been a draw for customers, especially with job losses and salary cuts since Covid-19 led crisis. A number of these companies are also looking at offering other products such as virtual credit cards and insurance.

Analysts believe that the sector has shrugged off the liquidity crisis during the Covid-19 pandemic and are set for more growth and tie-ups with banks and NBFCs.

Also read: Digital lending apps continue to see robust demand

A report by Credit Suisse estimates that retail digital lending has delivered about 43 per cent CAGR over the past seven years, reaching $ 110 billion in size by 2019, differentiated mainly by faster disbursements.

“Digital lending is being led by the emergence and growth of many specialised digital lenders like pay day, SME, unsecured retail and BNPL lenders who differentiate mainly through faster disbursements,” said the report, adding that they have gained more than a 40 per cent market share in new personal loans and over 20 per cent in unsecured retail loans. It also noted that they have been the worst impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.

‘More growth’

According to Monish Shah, Partner, Deloitte India, “We will see digital lending grow exponentially over the next few years on the basis of this data dividend, the unmet needs and increasing digital maturity across the segments. So the sector will require a fair bit of growth capital to drive customer acquisition and servicing.”

Shilpa Mankar Ahluwalia, Partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas noted that the sector has dealt with some negativity over the last few months but this has been triggered mainly because of a few bad actors that misappropriated personal data. “The sector is positioned to grow and once they have created the distribution channel for customers, there is the potential for growth of multiple financial products,” she said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SC Verdict: Additional relief of about ₹7,000 crore to borrowers may have to be given

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Centre may have to allocate an additional ₹7,000 crore as relief to borrowers following the Supreme Court verdict on loan moratorium on Tuesday, according to analysts.

“As per our estimates, the compounded interest for six month of moratorium across all lenders is estimated at ₹13,500 to ₹14,000 crore,” said Anil Gupta, Vice President – Financial Sector Ratings, ICRA.

Pointing out that the Centre has already announced relief for borrowers having borrowings up to ₹2 crore, which was estimated to cost about ₹6,500 crore to the Exchequer, Gupta said, “With announcement of waiver for all borrowers, the additional relief of about ₹7,000 crore to ₹7,500 will need to be provided to borrowers.”

Mahesh Misra, CEO, IMGC welcomed the Supreme Court judgement and said, “The court has limited its scope to judicial review and not opined on the merits of the policy. Any other outcome would have created a potential moral hazard and also penalized conscientious borrowers. This creates the right precedent as well.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

No compound interest on loan, irrespective of amount, during moratorium, rules SC

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court on Tuesday stopped banks from charging compound interest (interest on interest) or penal interest on any loan, irrespective of the amount, during the moratorium period.

A three-judge Bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, Subhash Reddy and M R Shah said the amounts taken as compound interest or penal interest should be adjusted in future loan payments.

However, the court agreed with the Rserve Bank of India (RBI) that extending the date of the loan moratorium was “not viable”.

The court said judicial review over fiscal policies was limited. The court cannot order specific financial reliefs.

The court questioned the rationale of limiting compound interest waiver to loan up to just ₹ 2 crore.

The government had introduced a pay-back scheme on October 23 last year. The scheme payments waived the difference in the compound interest and simple interest charged between March 1 and August 31 (moratorium period) for eight categories of loans worth up to ₹ two crore.

The eight categories were MSME, education, housing, consumer durables, credit card, auto, personal and consumption loans. The lending institutions included banking companies, public sector banks, cooperative banks, regional rural banks, all India financial institutions, non-banking financial companies, housing finance companies registered with RBI and national housing banks.

In November last year, the court had directed the Centre to implement the pay-back scheme.

However, borrowers had continued to press for an extension of the moratorium and also argued that the entire interest for the moratorium period should be scrapped. The petitioners also said the ₹ 2 -crore pay-back scheme did not bring any relief to big borrowers reeling under the impact of the pandemic.

While reserving the case for judgment on December 17 last year, the Indian Banks Association had said the pleas made by the petitioners extended beyond the financial stress they supposedly suffered during the pandemic.

The Centre had said a complete waiver of interest would cripple the economy and banking sector.

The State Bank of India had pleaded in support of the small depositors who form the “backbone” of the banking system.

“Small depositors are faceless in these proceedings. It is not a case of borrowers versus bank. They are the backbone of the financial system. Banks have to give interest to these depositors. How can we leave them?

For every loan account there are about 8.5 deposit accounts in the Indian banking system,” senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi had asked in court on the last date of hearing.

The RBI had referred to clause 3 of its August 6 circular for ‘Resolution Framework for COVID-19-related Stress’ to point out that lending institutions, guided by their respective Board-approved policy, would prepare viable resolution plans for eligible borrowers. However, the benefits would only be provided for borrowers stressed on account of COVID-19.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 424 425 426 427 428 540