Second Covid wave poses risks for India’s fragile economic recovery and Banks: Fitch

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s second wave of Covid-19 infections poses increased risks for India’s fragile economic recovery and its banks, cautioned Fitch Ratings.

The global credit rating agency already expects a moderately worse environment for the Indian banking sector in 2021, but headwinds would intensify should rising infections and follow-up measures to contain the virus further affect business and economic activity.

Fitch believes that a speedy economic recovery is critical for the sector to rebound, even though it expects a challenging landscape for Indian banks in 2021.

The agency said India’s active Covid-19 infections have been increasing at a rapid pace; new infections exceeded 1,00,000 a day in early April 2021, against 9,300 in mid-February 2021.

Fitch forecasts India’s real GDP growth at 12.8 per cent for the financial year ending March 2022 (FY22). This incorporates expectations of a slowdown in 2Q (April-June) 21 due to the flareup in new coronavirus cases but the rising pace of infections poses renewed risks to the forecast, the agency said in a note.

It observed that over 80 per cent of the new infections are in six prominent states, which combined account for roughly 45 per cent of total banking sector loans.

Any further disruption in economic activity in these states would pose a setback for fragile business sentiment, even though a stringent pan-India lockdown like the one in 2020 is unlikely, it added.

The agency assessed that the operating environment for banks will most likely remain challenging against this backdrop.

“This second wave could dent the sluggish recovery in consumer and corporate confidence, and further supress banks’ prospects for new business (9MFY21 credit growth: +4.5 per cent as per Fitch’s estimate),” the note said.

Asset quality concerns

Fitch flagged that there are also asset quality concerns since banks’ financial results are yet to fully factor in the first wave’s impact and the stringent 2020 lockdown due to the forbearances in place. “We consider the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) and retail loans to be most at risk.”

“Retail loans have been performing better than our expectations but might see increased stress if renewed restrictions impinge further on individual incomes and savings. MSMEs, however, benefited from state-guaranteed refinancing schemes that prevented stressed exposures from souring,” as per the note.

The agency noted that private banks are more exposed to retail but also have much better earnings capacity (average pre-provision operating profit (PPOP): 4.85 per cent of loans 9MFY21), contingency reserves (1.2 per cent of loans) and core capitalisation (CET/ common equity tier 1 ratio: 15.9 per cent) to withstand stress on their portfolios.

In contrast, state-owned banks remain more vulnerable as their prevailing weak asset quality and greater participation in relief measures are not commensurate with their limited loss-absorption buffers (average PPOP: 3.0 per cent; contingency reserves: 0.5 per cent; CET1 ratio: 9.8 per cent).

The extension of the MSME refinancing scheme until 30 June 2021 will alleviate short-term pain, but potentially add to the sector’s exposure to stressed MSMEs, which was around 8.5 per cent of loans (9MFY21) as per Fitch’s estimate.

”Nevertheless, we believe the second wave could have a more modest impact than the initial wave on our assessment of the operating environment in India, based on global examples of residents and economies adjusting their activities – including much less stringent and more localised restrictions than last year.

“The government’s more accommodative fiscal stance may also mitigate some short-term growth pressures. However, inoculating India’s large population in a fast and effective way will be important to avoid repeated disruptions,” the agency said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Serum Institute of India picks up stake in PolicyBazaar

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Adar Poonwala-led Serum Institute of India Private Limited has acquired a stake in PolicyBazaar from True North.

True North has sold a part of its holding in PolicyBazaar to five independent buyers – Ashoka India Equity Investment Trust Plc, Triumph Global Holdings Pte Limited, Serum Institute of India Private Limited, IIFL Special Opportunities Fund Series 8 and India Acorn Fund Limited.

In October 2020, True North had conducted the first tranche of its stake sale in the company. It continues to be invested in the company for its next phase of growth.

Divya Sehgal, Partner, True North, stated, “We’ve had a great partnership with PolicyBazaar over the last three years. We are extremely pleased with the company’s sustained growth momentum and efficiency in delivering great results in spite of the challenging market conditions. We will continue to support PolicyBazaar as it heads towards public markets in the next 12-15 months and scripts many more success stories.”

Yashish Dahiya, CEO, Policybazaar said, “True North has been and continues to be a good friend, advisor and has supported us as an investor through the last few years. We are grateful for that, and glad to see them having a good partial exit, we welcome on board the new shareholders. True North continues to be an investor and we thank them for the confidence.”

Having commenced operations in 2008, Policybazaar serves over 8 million insurance buyers annually and hosts 40+ insurers on its platform.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Northern Arc Capital raises $25 million debt from FMO

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Northern Arc Capital, a Chennai-based non-banking finance company (NBFC), has raised $25 million in debt from Dutch impact investor FMO. The fundraising comes close on heels of $10 million debt raised by the company last month from US-based Calvert Impact Capital.

Besides Calvert Impact, Northern Arc has attracted debt financing from an array of global Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) and impact investors over the last 12 months including from US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Microfinance borrowers in both urban and rural areas will be key beneficiaries of FMO’s investment, the debt financing platform said in a press release.

“A sizable part of the fund deployment will be towards MFIs whose loans are primarily targeted at women. The loans will play an important role in providing credit to the under-banked households and small businesses, who have been worst hit due to the crisis,” it added.

Commenting on the deal, Bama Balakrishnan, COO of Northern Arc said, “Northern Arc and FMO are natural partners in furthering the cause of financial inclusion in India. With a shared philosophy of catering to borrowers hard hit by Covid-19 pandemic, the facility from FMO is timely and would specifically be used for lending to women, micro-entrepreneurs and SMEs.”

As of March 31, 2021, Northern Arc has enabled significant debt financing of around Rs. 95,000 crore for its clients across microfinance, small business finance, affordable housing finance, vehicle finance, agriculture finance, consumer finance, fintech and mid-market corporates.

Over 140 investors including banks, asset managers, insurance companies, DFIs, private wealth have invested in transactions structured and arranged by Northern Arc Capital.

“The new transaction fits with FMO’s ambition to accelerate financial inclusion with a focus towards women-run businesses and (M)SMEs. With this transaction, FMO supports an excellent partner who continues to service its clients during these challenging COVID-19 times,” Huib-Jan de Ruijter, Chief Investment Officer (a.i), FMO was quoted in the release.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HDFC Bank gives grants to 21 start-ups, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


HDFC Bank, announced the winners of its fourth edition of SmartUp Grants 2021. SmartUp Grants are part of HDFC Bank’s broader initiative to foster the spirit of creativity and enterprise in the start-up space. It is an extension of HDFC Bank’s SmartUp Solution, which provides entrepreneurs with customised banking and advisory services.

The bank collaborated with nine incubators, including IIT Delhi, AIC-Bimtech, IIM Kashipur, IIT BHU, Banasthali University, C-CAMP, GUSEC, T-Hub, and Villgro, to shortlist and mentor the winners. The bank has given out grants worth Rs 19.4 crore in the last four years.

Twenty-one social-impact startups were chosen from 300 applications received across the country after a comprehensive screening process. These grants are intended to support start-ups that deliver unique ideas that will usher in long-term improvement in society and the world. These grants have been offered under the aegis of #Parivartan, the umbrella program for the bank’s social initiatives. The criteria for evaluating start-ups were the potential impact they could deliver on the following parameters: sustainability of the idea, potential to scale up, how does it benefit the society and environment, uniqueness of the Project

Smita Bhagat, Country Head, Government & Institutional Business, e-commerce and start-ups, HDFC Bank, said,” Through the SmartUp programme, we are nurturing the entrepreneurial spirit of the start-up community. We are aware of start-ups developing innovative ways to bring about long-term societal change. Our respect and enthusiasm for start-ups working to make our world more resilient is reflected in these grants.”

Ashima Bhat, group head – CSR, Infrastructure and Finance, HDFC Bank, said” We are honoured to be a part of an inspiring group of start-ups dedicated to meaningful social change. It is also the focus of #Parivartan, our flagship CSR initiative. There are start-ups that are working to improve livelihood, skilling, and working with the challenged sections of society; bringing inclusive change, which is in line with our goal of giving back to the society we live in.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India’s Central Bank Says ‘Boo.’ Carry Traders Faint

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


“India joins the money printers.”

That’s how an ING Bank research note describes the Reserve Bank of India’s explicit commitment to buy ₹1 lakh crore ($14 billion) in government bonds this quarter. Since this new move has been given a fancy name — Government Securities Acquisition Program — it will probably both extend and expand.

Large-scale bond-buying and money-printing may result in a glut of rupees, causing them to depreciate against the dollar. Which is why the foreign-exchange market pushed the dollar 1.56% higher against the rupee, one of the largest one-day moves in the past decade.

Quantitative easing

Is this the start of quantitative easing? Robert Carnell, ING’s head of Asia-Pacific research, thinks so: “QE, once the preserve of reserve currency central banks, is now becoming pretty mainstream,” he writes. With its new program, India has “joined the ranks of Indonesia and the Philippines in Asia who have dabbled with this policy.”

 

Bond traders aren’t all so sure. The yardstick for a monetary bazooka is Mario Draghi’s “whatever it takes” moment at the European Central Bank in the summer of 2012, or Haruhiko Kuroda’s bold 2013 campaign at the Bank of Japan to end 15 years of deflation. RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das’s manoeuvre isn’t in the same league. It’s just a formal announcement of open market bond purchases the authority does on an ad hoc basis anyway. How can you get excited about $14 billion of debt-buying this quarter, when the preceding three months’ total was $20 billion?

Rather than chalking up the program as full-fledged quantitative easing, traders like Arvind Chari, chief investment officer at Quantum Advisors Pvt., are more comfortable calling it a yield-curve flattener, which should help the central bank manage a bloated government borrowing program. The benchmark 10-year yield has indeed shifted lower over the past two trading sessions.

Crowded carry trade

The fixed-income folks probably have it right: This isn’t the start of a new monetary policy regime. As for the massive move in the currency, Mumbai-based finance professor and Observatory Group analyst Ananth Narayan has a simple explanation. The carry trade in the Indian rupee has been getting crowded, he says.

These are bets where speculators borrow a low-yielding currency, such as the dollar, to buy a high-yielding emerging market currency. As long as what they’re buying (the rupee in this case) doesn’t drop like a stone, they come out ahead. A fall like Wednesday’s would scare them off and lead to an unwinding of positions, which in Narayan’s calculations had swelled in just five months through February to $40 billion.

What has been bringing carry traders to India, besides the chance to earn a three-month yield of 3.3%, by swapping into rupees the dollars they borrowed at the three-month Libor rate of less than 0.2%? Before Wednesday, they could be reasonably sure that the rupee, the best-performing emerging-market currency in the first quarter, would remain propped up by strong capital inflows: Overseas investors have ploughed $37 billion into India’s frothy equity market over the past year.

With inflation one percentage point above the mid-point of the central bank’s 2%-6% target range, and local savers grumbling about unremunerative deposits, there was little risk that the RBI would go down the path of adventurism. The opportunity for unconventional action was last year, when Bank Indonesia decided to directly fund its government’s fight against the coronavirus. Now markets are starting to expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise interest rates sooner than it has indicated so far, leading to a flight of capital from emerging markets.

This is a time for policy prudence and currency stability. Or that’s what the carry traders were betting.

They expected the RBI to gradually withdraw the $89 billion of surplus domestic liquidity in the banking system. The monetary authority had opened the floodgates last year to fill the cracks caused by Covid-19 dislocation. Since removing this excess by selling interest-bearing central bank paper would entail a visible fiscal expenditure, the RBI was doing it by converting some of its spot dollar purchases (which keep the rupee competitive for exports) into forward purchases, accompanied by spot dollar sales. The latter sucked out the rupee liquidity.

The implied rupee interest rate involved in this minor operation is much higher than the local money market rate, says Narayan, but it’s not a cost that has to be explicitly acknowledged. The message to carry traders was clear: Who wouldn’t want to buy a currency whose sole issuer wants them so severely as to implicitly pay a hefty premium to have them back for one year?

But then the RBI cried “boo” in a crowded room. Its bond-buying announcement came amid a sinister-looking resurgence of the pandemic that could drag out the recovery from last year’s harsh lockdown. New cases reported Thursday spiked to a daily record of more than 126,700, and vaccine stocks dwindled to three days in Maharashtra, the worst-affected state and home to Mumbai, India’s financial capital.

Moody’s Investors Service flagged this second wave as a risk to domestic air travel and of airport operators’ credit quality. ICRA Ltd., the local Moody’s affiliate, said a jump in infections could spook investors, making it more challenging for home financiers and other shadow banks to securitize retail assets. The banking system was in poor health even before the virus outbreak. Nonperforming loans this year could be at a 20-year high, Capital Economics says.

This sudden surge in economic uncertainty provided the RBI with elbow room to talk yields down. It took the chance and unveiled what’s billed as a big-ticket easing program, but in reality, it may be more water pistol than a bazooka. Carry traders got shocked, nonetheless.

People are so jumpy nowadays.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India’s massive borrowing seen hindering RBI’s new bond purchases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India’s pledge to buy as much as ₹1 lakh crore ($13.4 billion) of bonds this quarter has sent a wave of relief through the sovereign debt market. However, some say the move may be insufficient in the face of the nation’s near-record borrowing plan.

India’s benchmark 10-year bond yield extended its decline to 6.03% after posting its biggest intraday drop in two months on Wednesday following RBI’s explicit assurance of debt purchases.

“While RBI remains supportive of the market, we still believe demand-supply dynamics remain unfavourable,” Standard Chartered Plc analysts, including Nagaraj Kulkarni wrote in a note. The bank estimates the RBI would need to buy five trillion rupees of bonds to plug the demand-supply gap.

Indian bond yields surged to their highest in almost a year last month as the government’s plans to sell ₹12.1 lakh crore of debt in the fiscal year that started in April and global reflation bets dampened the demand for sovereign notes.

With the RBI unable to cut rates due to persistent inflation pressure, the tension between traders and the central bank kept building as auctions were scrapped and market participants pushed for a formal bond-purchase plan.

RBI chief Shaktikanta Das had earlier said the central bank bought ₹3.1 lakh crore worth of bonds in the previous fiscal year to March 31 and planned similar or more purchases this year. On Wednesday, the RBI said the new plan was included in its liquidity projections for the year, without giving details on purchases after the first quarter.

Fundamentals don’t justify the scope for a sizable rally in India’s 10-year government bonds considering “external conditions and lingering inflation risks,” Duncan Tan, a rates strategist at DBS Bank Ltd. wrote in a note.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

With work flexibility, Singapore’s DBS Group to cut office space

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


DBS Group Holdings Ltd. is poised to trim office space in Singapore, the latest bank to pare its footprint in the city-state during the coronavirus pandemic.

According to people with knowledge of the matter, Southeast Asia’s largest bank plans to surrender about two and half floors, or 75,000 square feet, in Tower 3 of the Marina Bay Financial Centre. The lender occupies more than a dozen floors in the building, located in the central business district near the iconic Marina Bay Sands hotel and casino.

DBS is set to give up the floors in December, the people said, asking not to be identified because the plans are private. A representative for the company declined to comment.

 

The move comes on top of the lender’s plans to cut space in the pricey Hong Kong market. Banks worldwide are rethinking their use of offices after the health crisis showed that they can still operate effectively with many employees at home. HSBC Holdings Plc is allowing more than 1,200 staff at its U.K. call centres to permanently work remotely.

In Singapore, DBS follows the footsteps of Citigroup Inc. and Mizuho Financial Group Inc. Citigroup is giving up three floors as it aims to better optimize its real estate, while Mizuho is cutting space equivalent to less than one floor on the back of work from home success.

Anchor Tenant

DBS is the anchor tenant at MBFC Tower 3, part of a three-tower complex managed by Raffles Quay Asset Management. Other tenants include Rio Tinto Plc. It’s the headquarters for DBS, which also has space in Changi Business Park.

Singapore’s largest bank has been promoting work flexibility while also espousing the benefits of office life. In November, it said employees would be allowed to work remotely as much as 40% of the time. Chief Executive Officer Piyush Gupta said last month that staff sometimes need to be in the office to “build the soul of the company.”

The downsizing by financial firms may not necessarily be a huge setback for the Singapore office market, given that tech behemoths are expanding their presence in the Southeast Asian hub. Amazon.com Inc. is taking up the three floors Citigroup is relinquishing, while ByteDance Ltd. agreed to lease three floors in a building in the financial district.

Singapore’s office market has shown recent signs of a recovery. The vacancy rate eased to 3.3% last quarter from 3.9% in the last three months of 2020, according to preliminary estimates by CBRE Research. The rebound was led by Grade A office buildings, with rents for those properties remaining stable in the quarter.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance ministry requests health, home ministries for vaccination of bank employees on priority basis, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The union finance ministry has requested the health and home ministries for issuing instructions for enabling COVID-19 vaccination of employees of banks and National Payments Corporation of India on priority basis.

This will go a long way in assuring bank employees about safety of themselves and their families and also boost their morale in continuing to provide their services to customers even in these difficult times when the fresh wave has swept many states, the finance ministry in its recent communication said.

Out of total strength of 13.5 lakh employees in the banking sector, about 600 unfortunate deaths due to COVID-19 were recorded, as per the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) data.

In percentage terms, 0.04 per cent of total strength lost their lives.

The communication to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Ministry of Home Affairs emphasised important role of bankers during disbursal and withdrawal of benefits transferred under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana.

Similarly, it said, the reliance on digital mode of payments increased and employees of National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) played critical role in ensuring unhindered services.

The IBA in the last month had written a letter addressed to Secretary Health and Family Welfare for inclusion of bank employees for vaccination on priority basis given their role their important role in running the economy.

The association had requested the ministry for free vaccination on priority basis.

With the new variant of mutant virus, the risk has increased manifold for those who are not vaccinated, the IBA had said.

Quoting observation of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs, IBA had said the committee appreciated the efforts and pain taken by the banking sector for providing uninterrupted and seamless banking facility during the COVID-19 outbreak.

While recognising good work done by the banking sector, the committee emphasised that they be declared COVID-19 warriors, IBA letter to Health Secretary said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Pay scale for bank CGMs made almost equal to EDs, executives say its against natural justice, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Pay hikes, especially steep ones, should make executives smile, but not so in the case of public sector banks. A recent government note allowing banks to raise pay scales for chief general managers by as much as 62% has not gone down well with a section of bank executives.

This makes their remuneration almost at par with that of executive directors. The new pay scale structure, several top bank executives say, is against principles of natural justice.

The new pay scale for bank CGMs has been fixed at Rs 166350-183950 from Rs 103,000-113900 and this would be effective retrospectively from the date when they assumed charge in their respective banks, the Department of Financial Services said in a letter to chief executives of nationalised banks. This is in line with CGM pay scale in State Bank of India, the DFS note said.

ET has reviewed the DFS letter, dated April 1, 2021.

Pay scale for executive directors has been Rs 176800-224000, which was last revised in December 2016.

Bank managing directors and EDs draw salary following the 7th national pay commission recommendation while CGMs’ salary hike followed the latest bipartite wage settlement like other bank employees.

However, as CGM positions in banks are created with board approval, the revision in their pay scale, allowances and other terms and conditions require government’s approval.

“At present the issue has created a lot of heat among top bank executives. Some more clarity is needed on the matter,” an executive director with a mid-sized bank said. “If the issue is not addressed, there may not be any incentive for people to apply for ED positions,” the person said. Several other senior executives with public sector banks corroborated his views.

“The anguish among bank executives is not surprising. Responsibility of an ED is much larger than a CGM and therefore, they should draw a much higher salary than CGMs,” a former bank chief executive said.

Banks were given the flexibility to create CGM level with separate pay structure in August 2019. Following this, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Punjab National Bank and Union Bank of India created the position in March 2020. Bank of India created the position in October last year.

Some of the banks such as erstwhile United Bank of India had created CGM post earlier but there was no pay scale benefit attached to that.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFCs to face fresh challenges due to Covid surge: Analysts

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Meanwhile, the extension of the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) for SMEs till June 2021 will offer such borrowers further breathing space.

India’s non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) face renewed asset quality and liquidity risks as the country battles a fresh surge in coronavirus infections, analysts said. There could be a fall in securitisation volumes, as was seen in H1FY21, affecting non-bank lenders adversely.

The economic impact of various restrictions imposed by states will depend on their duration and severity. Expanded curbs could derail the fragile recovery in India’s NBFC sector since a nationwide lockdown was gradually relaxed from mid-2020, rating agency Fitch said on Thursday.

“SMEs (small and medium enterprises), commercial vehicle operators, microfinance and other wholesale borrowers remain at greater risk of stress in this environment, particularly as financial buffers would have narrowed after the severe economic shock over the past year. Production and supply chains remain susceptible to labour shortages if the large-scale urban-to-rural labour migration in 2020 recurs,” Fitch said in a note.

At the same time, regulators appear keenly aware of the credit and liquidity implications of any broad, extended movement curbs, while NBFCs’ day-to-day operations are also likely to be able to continue under the latest rules.

A resurgence in asset-quality pressure for NBFcs could lead to renewed funding strains for the sector, particularly as many government schemes that provided funding relief to NBFCs in 2020 have expired. These include the partial credit guarantee scheme supporting asset-backed securitisation and special liquidity scheme providing government-guaranteed short-term funding relief. Meanwhile, the extension of the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) for SMEs till June 2021 will offer such borrowers further breathing space.

Icra Ratings said that due to the Covid-19 pandemic and resultant nationwide lockdowns, securitisation volumes had seen an unprecedented fall in H1FY21 after two successive years of healthy volumes close to Rs 2 lakh crore each. As economic activity gradually resumed and loan disbursements gained momentum, even reaching pre-Covid levels for some NBFCs, the securitisation market saw a healthy uptick in volumes during H2FY21. As per the rating agency’s estimates, the securitisation volumes for FY21 were at about Rs 85,000–90,000 crore, of which volumes in Q4 contributed nearly 45%.

Abhishek Dafria, vice-president and head – structured finance ratings, Icra, said that the rising Covid cases may again create uncertainty among investors. While the lockdowns announced so far are less restrictive in comparison to the nationwide lockdown seen last year, an unabated increase in Covid cases is likely to bring about fears of harsher lockdowns which could impact the asset quality of retail loans. “This in turn would impact the fundraising ability of the NBFCs and HFCs through securitisation of their assets. Successful implementation of the vaccination programme and ability of government agencies to arrest the rising infections would remain critical in the near term,” Dafria said.

Among its rated issuers, Fitch views IIFL Finance as the most vulnerable to recent developments due to its exposure to affected states and to higher-risk developers, SMEs and microfinance. Shriram Transport Finance Company is also relatively exposed because of its concentration in commercial vehicle finance, although essential-goods volumes could provide an offset in affected areas.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 397 398 399 400 401 540