Government notifies law to shed holding in public sector general insurance company

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

President Ram Nath Kovind has given his assent to a bill to amend the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act. This will facilitate bringing down government’s equity below 51 per cent in a public sector general insurance company

Govt moves to shed stake in a general insurance co

Titled, the ‘General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 2021’, the new law has brought in three amendments. First one aims “to omit the proviso to section 10B of the Act so as to remove the requirement that the Central Government holds not less than 51 per cent. of the equity capital in a specified insurer”. The second one will insert a new section 24B “providing for cessation of application of the Act to such specified insurer on and from the date on which the Central Government ceases to have control over it.” And the third one will insert “a new section 31A providing for liability of a director of specified insurer, who is not a whole-time director, in respect of such acts of omission or commission of the specified insurer which has been committed with his knowledge and with his consent.”

 

According to the objectives of the bill, with a view to provide for greater private participation in the public sector insurance companies and to enhance insurance penetration and social protection and better secure the interests of policy holders and contribute to faster growth of the economy, it has become necessary to amend certain provisions of the Act.

LIC divestment: It’s like killing the golden goose

The new law is seen as a move to implement the budget announcement on privatisation of one of the public sector general insurance companies. However, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has repeatedly said that the new law is not for privatisation. “What we are trying to in this is not to privatise, we are bringing some enabling provision so that the Government can bring in public participation, the common people’s participation in the general insurance companies,” she had said while introducing the bill during just concluded Monsoon session of the Parliament.

Further she mentioned that general insurance companies in the private sector have greater penetration, as they raise more money from market and therefore give a better premium for insuring public and also have innovate packages. “Whereas public general insurance companies are not able to perform because they are always short of resources,” Sitharaman said.

As on date, there are four general insurance companies in the public sector – National Insurance Company Ltd, New India Assurance Company Ltd, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd and the United India Insurance Company Ltd. Now, it is not yet known that in which one of them, the government will lower its shareholding.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks may slow ATM expansion, encourage online transactions, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The new Reserve Bank of India rule to penalise banks Rs 10,000 for each instance of an ATM out of cash for 10 hours has an unintended fallout in the form of banks slowing down the rollout of ATMs.

According to experts, banks may rely on other banks ATMs if there are more restrictions rather than setting up new ones. With digital channels picking up banks would go slow on ATMs.

The directive may cost banks Rs 125-200 crore, according to estimates by ATM operators and cash logistics companies.

In a circular to banks, the RBI said that they should monitor the availability of cash in ATMs and ensure that there are no cash-outs. The circular said that banks would be fined Rs 10,000 if there is a cash-out at any ATM for more than 10 hours in a month.

The issue

There are 2,13,766 ATMs in the country, and most of them are managed by MSPs who appoint cash-in-transit companies to replenish the currency notes in the machines.

An ATM typically goes out of cash six times every month and nearly 50% of the ATMs face this issue. The biggest hit will be to State Bank of India which has about 64,000 ATMs.

However, there are certain locations where ATMs run out of cash within hours of being loaded. These machines may not become feasible to operate if there is a penalty every month.

The reaction

There is a mixed reaction to the move by the RBI to penalise banks Rs 10,000 for each instance of an ATM being out of cash for 10 hours. ATM operators (known in the industry as managed service providers, or MSPs) and cash-in-transit companies are throwing up their hands, stating that they will not bear the penalty.

However, it is quite likely that the banks may pass the penalty to MSPs, which will in turn pass it on to cash logistics agencies.

Experts stress the need to address the root causes of ATMs running dry, such as sub-optimal cash forecasting and delays in the availability of ATM-fit currency.

The RBI circular

Already banks are struggling to meet the 2018 RBI circular that requires banks to put in place stringent measures such as transporting cash in cassettes, in prescribed vehicles sticking to government norms on the transport of currency during specified hours of the day. According to banks, it is difficult to implement all these norms under present cost structures.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

AGS Transact Technologies plans IPO of up to ₹800 crore through OFS

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AGS Transact Technologies Ltd (AGSTTL) is planning an initial public offer (IPO) of up to ₹800 crore through an offer for sale (OFS) by the selling shareholders.

The OFS will be made by the promoter selling shareholder — Ravi B Goyal — aggregating up to ₹792 crore and other selling shareholders — VC Gupte, Shailesh Shetty, Rakesh Kumar, Nikhil Patiyat and Rajesh Harshedrai Shah — aggregating up to ₹8 crore.

The selling shareholders collectively hold 55.33 per cent of the pre-offer share capital of the company.

As per AGSTTL’s draft red herring prospectus, the objects of the offer are to carry out OFS by the selling shareholders and to realise the benefits of listing of the equity shares on the stock exchanges, enhancement of the company’s brand name and creation of a public market for the equity shares in India.

Currently, promoters — Ravi B Goyal (55.20 per cent stake) and Vineha Enterprises Private Ltd/VEPL (42.21 per cent) — collectively hold 97.61 per cent stake in AGSTTL. The promoter group holds 98.23 per cent stake.

AGSTTL is an omni-channel payment solutions provider, which provides digital and cash-based solutions to banks and corporate clients.

The company provides customised products and services comprising ATM and CRM outsourcing, cash management and digital payment solutions including merchant solutions, transaction processing services and mobile wallets.

For FY21, AGSTTL’s revenue from operations was at ₹1,759 crore (₹1,800 crore for FY20) and net profit was ₹55 crore ( ₹83 crore).

Pursuant to a Share Subscription Agreement (SSA) dated April 1, 2021 entered into between VEPL and AGSTTL, the latter subscribed to 65 crore compulsorily convertible preference shares (CCPS) of VEPL of face value ₹10 each.

Pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated August 16, 2021 entered into between Ravi B. Goyal and AGSTTL, Goyal has agreed to purchase and AGSTTL has agreed to sell the VEPL CCPS on terms set out in such agreement, as per the DRHP.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Here are the top 5 bank fixed deposit interest rates, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The fixed deposit (FD) is one of the most popular investment avenues. Many investors prefer bank FDs over equities as the former are considered safe. The return earned from a bank FD is fixed and known at the time of investing unlike in case of equity.

Fixed deposits are also known as term deposits. This is because money is deposited with a bank for a fixed predetermined time period or term. Here are certain things that you must know while opening an FD account.

You can open a term deposit account with a bank where one already has a savings account. Some banks may allow you to open an FD account without having to open a savings bank account. However, you will be required to undergo a know-your-customer (KYC) process in case the bank allows you to place an FD without a savings account. You will be asked to provide self-attested photocopies of ID proof such as PAN, address proof such as Aadhaar, Voter ID card, passport etc. and coloured passport size photographs. You will be required to show the original documents which will be returned immediately post-verification.

  • Minimum and maximum investment amount

The minimum amount needed to open a fixed deposit account varies from bank to bank. However, there is no limit on the maximum amount which one can invest in an FD.The minimum and maximum tenure offered for which an FD can be placed varies from one bank to another. Usually, one can invest in FD for a minimum period of 7 days and for a maximum of 10 years. You can choose the period for which you wish to keep your FD as per your requirement.

Top 5 bank fixed deposit interest rates
Tenure: 1 year

Bank Name Interest rate (%) Compounded qtrly What Rs 10,000 will grow into
RBL Bank 6.10 10624.10
Indusind Bank 6.00 10613.64
DCB Bank 5.55 10566.66
Bandhan Bank 5.50 10561.45
IDFC First Bank 5.50 10561.45

Tenure: 2 years

Bank Name Interest rate (%) Compounded qtrly What Rs 10,000 will grow into
RBL Bank 6.10 11287.14
Indusind Bank 6.00 11264.93
Axis Bank 5.50 11154.42
Bandhan Bank 5.50 11154.42
DCB Bank 5.50 11154.42

Tenure: 3 years

Bank Name Interest rate (%) Compounded qtrly What Rs 10,000 will grow into
RBL Bank 6.30 12062.63
Indusind Bank 6.00 11956.18
DCB Bank 5.95 11938.52
IDFC First Bank 5.75 11868.13
Karnataka Bank 5.50 11780.68

Tenure: 5 years

Bank Name Interest rate (%) Compounded qtrly What Rs 10,000 will grow into
RBL Bank 6.50 13804.20
IDFC First Bank 6.00 13468.55
Indusind Bank 6.00 13468.55
DCB Bank 5.95 13435.42
Axis Bank 5.75 13303.65

All data sourced from Economic Times Intelligence Group (ETIG)
Data as on August 20, 2021
The interest rate offered on fixed deposits (FDs) will depend on the period for which you are investing in the FD and also vary from bank to bank for FDs for the same tenure. Senior citizens are typically offered higher interest rates. To receive the interest payment, you can choose either cumulative option or non-cumulative option.

Under the cumulative option, interest accrued on the deposit is reinvested and paid at the time of maturity along with principal amount.

In the non-cumulative option, interest is credited into the depositors account at the pay-out interval chosen at the time of placing the FD. Generally, one can choose from the options of receiving the interest on monthly, quarterly, half-yearly or annually basis as offered by the bank.

Interest received on FD is fully taxable in the hands of the investor. It will be taxed at the rates applicable to your income tax slabs. TDS will be deducted by the bank if the interest payment in a single financial year exceeds Rs 10,000, as per current tax laws. To avoid TDS, one can submit Form 15G or Form 15H (as applicable) to the bank.In case of any urgent requirements, one can break his/her FD before the maturity date. A penalty may be levied by the bank on premature withdrawals. The penalty amount varies from one bank to another.

While placing a FD, one must check the rules regarding pre-mature withdrawals. Sometimes, banks offer FDs without premature withdrawal facility as well as FDs without penalty on premature withdrawal.

One can use FD as a collateral to obtain a loan. The maximum loan sanctioned is usually a certain percentage of the principal deposit. This percentage may vary bank to bank.Nomination facility for Fixed Deposits (FDs) is also available.At maturity, if no specific instructions are given, most banks automatically renew the FD for the same period for which it was initially placed at the interest rates prevailing on the date the FD matures. If you do not want automatic renewal of your FD, you need to choose this option on the account opening form.

If you have forgotten to mention it, then you can visit the bank branch on the day of maturity and ask them to credit the proceeds into your savings account.

Nowadays banks offer the facility of opening an FD account online via Net banking through your account. One can invest in FD without having to visit a branch physically. However, remember that your bank may not issue you a printed FD receipt/advice if invested online.

Disclaimer: The data/information given above is subject to change therefore before taking any decision based on it, contact the bank/institution concerned.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

For bank regulators across the world, tech giants are now too big to fail, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


More than a decade on from the financial crisis, regulators are spooked once again that some companies at the heart of the financial system are too big to fail. But they’re not banks.

This time it’s the tech giants including Google, Amazon and Microsoft that host a growing mass of bank, insurance and market operations on their vast cloud internet platforms that are keeping watchdogs awake at night.

Central bank sources told Reuters the speed and scale at which financial institutions are moving critical operations such as payment systems and online banking to the cloud constituted a step change in potential risks.

“We are only at the beginning of the paradigm shift, therefore we need to make sure we have a fit-for-purpose solution,” said a financial regulator from a Group of Seven country, who declined to be named.

It is the latest sign of how financial regulators are joining their data and competition counterparts in scrutinising the global clout of Big Tech more closely.

Banks and technology companies say greater use of cloud computing is a win-win as it results in faster and cheaper services that are more resilient to hackers and outages.

But regulatory sources say they fear a glitch at one cloud company could bring down key services across multiple banks and countries, leaving customers unable to make payments or access services, and undermine confidence in the financial system.

The U.S. Treasury, European Union, Bank of England and Bank of France are among those stepping up their scrutiny of cloud technology to mitigate the risks of banks relying on a small group of tech firms and companies being “locked in”, or excessively dependent, on one cloud provider.

“We’re very alert to the fact that things will fail,” said Simon McNamara, chief administrative officer at British bank NatWest. “If 10 organisations aren’t prepared and are connected into one provider that disappears, then we’ll all have a problem.”

The EU proposed in September that “critical” external services for the financial industry such as the cloud should be regulated to strengthen existing recommendations on outsourcing from the bloc’s banking authority that date back to 2017.

The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meanwhile wants greater insight into agreements between banks and cloud operators and the Bank of France told lenders last month they must have a written contract that clearly defines controls over outsourced activities.

“The FPC is of the view that additional policy measures to mitigate financial stability risks in this area are needed,” it said in July.

The European Central Bank, which regulates the biggest lenders in the euro zone, said on Wednesday that bank spending on cloud computing rose by more than 50% in 2019 from 2018.

And that’s just the start. Spending on cloud services by banks globally is forecast to more than double to $85 billion in 2025 from $32.1 billion in 2020, according to data from technology research firm IDC shared with Reuters.

An IDC survey of 50 major banks globally identified just six primary providers of cloud services: IBM, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Alibaba and Oracle.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) – the largest cloud provider according to Synergy Group – posted sales of $28.3 billion in the six months to June, up 35% on the prior year and higher than its annual revenue of $25.7 billion as recently as 2018.

While all industries have ramped up cloud spending, analysts told Reuters that financial services firms had moved faster since the pandemic after an explosion in demand for online banking and emergency lending schemes.

“Banks are still very diligent but they have gained a higher level of comfort with the model and are moving at a fairly rapid pace,” said Jason Malo, director analyst at consultants Gartner.

Regulators worry that cloud failures would cause banking systems to fall over and stop people accessing their money, but say they have little visibility over cloud providers.

Last month, the Bank of England said big tech companies could dictate terms and conditions to financial firms and were not always providing enough information for their clients to monitor risks – and that “secrecy” had to end.

There is also concern that banks may not be spreading their risk enough among cloud providers.

Google told Reuters that less than a fifth of financial firms were using multiple clouds in case one failed, according to a recent survey, although 88% of those that did not spread their risk yet planned to do so within a year.

Central bank sources said part of the solution may be some form of mechanism that offers reassurance on resilience from cloud providers to banks to mitigate the sector’s aggregate exposure to one cloud service – with the banking regulator having the overall vantage point.

“Regardless of the division of control responsibilities between the cloud service provider and the bank, the bank is ultimately responsible for the effectiveness of the control environment,” the U.S. Federal Reserve said in draft guidance issued to lenders last month.

FINRA, which regulates Wall Street brokers, published a report on Monday ahead of potential rule changes to ensure that using the cloud does not harm the market or investors.

Being able to switch cloud providers easily when needed is, however, a task that is more easily said than done and could introduce disruptions to business, the FINRA report said.

Banks and tech firms contest the suggestion that greater adoption of the cloud is making the financial system’s infrastructure inherently riskier.

Adrian Poole, director for financial services in the United Kingdom and Ireland for Google Cloud, said the cloud can be more effective in bolstering a bank’s security capabilities than by building it in-house.

British digital lender Zopa said it had moved 80% of its transactions to the cloud and was working to mitigate risks. Zopa Chief Executive Jaidev Janardana said the company was also deliberately leaning on tech firms’ expertise.

“Cloud providers invest a lot of resources in security at a scale that few individual companies could manage,” he said.

Google’s Poole said the company was open to working more closely with financial regulators.

“We may one day see regulators pulling data on demand from regulated banks with cloud-enabled application programming interfaces (APIs), instead of waiting for banks to periodically push data at them,” he said.

NatWest’s McNamara said the bank was collaborating closely with tech firms and regulators to mitigate risks, and had put alternative services in place in case things went wrong.

“The buck stops with us,” McNamara said. “We don’t put all our eggs in one basket.”

One problem, though, is that not all banks have a full understanding of the risks to resiliency that could come with a wholesale shift to the cloud, said Jost Hoppermann, principal analyst at Forrester, particularly the smaller lenders.

“Some banks do not have the necessary know-how,” he said. “They think doing this will vanish all their problems, and certainly that isn’t true.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Ujjivan SFB: Working on smooth transition in consultation with RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Ujjivan Small Finance Bank said the transition post resignation of Nitin Chugh as Managing Director and CEO is being smoothly managed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.

“The bank has been working for several months to strengthen the board,” it said in a statement.

Noting that the bank has recently witnessed several challenges on the business front, coupled with several resignations both at the board level and senior management, Ujjivan SFB further said, “The immediate task of bank board in close collaboration with the holding company would be to bring back stability and achieve its desired goals and growth, complete the reverse merger and see that shareholders’ interest is duly taken care of.”

“The bank looks at the future with optimism,” it stressed.

New postings

BA Prabhakar, former CMD of Andhra Bank and Chairman of NSDL, joined the Ujjivan SFB’s board as an Independent Director and is being considered as part-time Chairman of the bank.

The board of Ujjivan Financial Services has nominated Samit Ghosh, the founder of Ujjivan, as a common (non-executive, non-independent) director on the bank board to provide oversight on some critical areas like portfolio quality and people management.

“His direct involvement would also facilitate the reverse merger of the bank and holding company. Further, his long standing experience in the microfinance sector would stand in good stead in guiding the bank management to steer through the present credit crisis,” the statement said.

In a stock exchange filing on August 19, Ujjivan SFB said Chugh has tendered his resignation as MD and CEO citing personal reasons. He will step down from the role on September 30.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IndusInd bank thought they had securities even as legal notices were ignored, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Repeated requests, follow ups and legal notices slapped on Karvy Stock Broking Ltd (KSBL) did not help IndusInd Bank since 2019 in ensuring repayment of Rs 137 crore loan taken from them.

“The bank tried its best to get clarity on the repayment schedule or the status of repayment. Despite repeated oral remainders and calls to C Parthasarathy, no reply was forthcoming as to when the repayment will be made,” IndusInd Bank told police at the time of lodging the complaint.

“On some occasions they assured the bank that they will pay on time and even at this stage they confirmed that security was available to cover the bank’s exposure,” the bank said.

Later, the bank served demand notices to KSBL and Parthasarathy saying that they repay the dues in five days. At this stage, the bank was under the impression that they are secured since they have sufficient collateral in the form of pledged securities to recover the outstanding dues.

But IndusInd bank got a rude shock after SEBI in November 2019 took action against KSBL, and IndusInd bank knew they had no collateral left as a surety. Finally, IndusInd bank approached Hyderabad police detective department.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Here’s how the scam played out, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Less than two years after the Karvy demat scam came to light, Karvy Group chairman C Parthasarathy was finally arrested in Hyderabad on Thursday on charges of defaulting on a bank loan. Swati Bharadwaj & Partha Sinha break down the details for you

What was the Karvy demat scam?

Hyderabad-based Karvy Group flagship Karvy Stock Broking (KSBL) pledged securities lying in the demat accounts of its clients, without their permission, to raise funds from multiple banks and financial institutions. These funds were then diverted into other Karvy group companies like Karvy Realty.

What was the magnitude of the scam?

Initial estimates showed that KSBL pledged securities of over 95,000 clients illegally and raised over Rs 2,300 crore via loans against shares (LAS) from multiple lenders like HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, IndusInd Bank, Axis Bank, Bajaj Finance, Aditya Birla Finance.

How was the scam done?

The broking firm transferred shares from the demat accounts of its clients, which were not active, into its demat account named Karvy Stock Broking (BSE) and showed these stocks as its own securities to lenders as collateral for taking loans.

How and when was it unearthed?

On June 20, 2019, markets regulator Sebi came out with a circular on handling client securities which said that brokers could not pledge client securities to raise loans for themselves, which till then was an established market practice. Sebi had set a deadline of September 30, 2019, for brokers to segregate client funds and securities but when KSBL failed to do so by the given deadline, investors complained to Sebi, which then asked NSE to investigate the matter

What was the action taken by regulatory agencies?

On November 22, 2019, Sebi issued an order banning KSBL from broking services and said the firm had transferred Rs 1096 crore to group company Karvy Realty between April 2016 to October 2019. Sebi also asked NSE to conduct a detailed forensic audit while working closely with depository participants (DPs) and stock exchanges to quickly transfer some of the illegally transferred securities back into the accounts of investors. In January 2020, the Union corporate affairs ministry also ordered the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Hyderabad, to probe Karvy group financial fraud.

What about investor compensation?

In December 2019, soon after the scam came to light, Sebi worked with DPs and stock exchanges to transfer securities of nearly 83,000 out of the over 95,000 scam-hit KSBL clients from Karvy’s demat account back into their respective accounts. In November 2020, NSE said it had settled claims worth Rs 2,300 crore to around 2.4 lakh KSBL investors with fund balances of up to Rs 30,000. In early 2021, under directions from Sebi, KSBL’s demat accounts were auctioned off to IIFL Securities and its trading accounts were auctioned to Axis Securities as part of efforts to compensate investors.

Tracking the scam

2019

November 22 | Markets regulator Sebi issues exparte order banning Karvy Stock Broking Ltd (KSBL) from broking activities

November 26 | Karvy Group CMD C Parthasarathy resigns from board of Karvy Fintech, which later rechristens itself as K-Fin Technologies

December 2 | Under Sebi’s directions NSDL and NSE transfer securities worth around Rs 2,300 crore of nearly 83,000 clients of KSBL back into their accounts

December 2 | NSE & BSE suspend KSBL from all market segments for violation of compliance norms

December 4 | SAT turns down KSBL lenders plea to get back the securities that were transferred back to clients so that pledge can be invoked

December 14 | Sebi refuses relief to KSBL lenders

December 31 | Karvy Group kicks of corporate rejig and management reshuffle as damage control exercise; brings in Amitabh Chaturvedi as CEO of financial services business

2020

January | Union ministry of corporate affairs (MoCA) orders probe into Karvy Group affairs

August | Telangana high court dismisses writ petitions filed by Karvy Group challenging SFIO & RoC probes into financial affairs in wake of demat scam

November | NSE settles claims worth Rs 2,300 crore to around 2.4 lakh KSBL investors with fund balances of up to Rs 30,000

2021

February | Depositories and stock exchanges auction KSBL’s demat and trading accounts to IIFL Securities and Axis Securities, respectively

April | IIFL Securities starts activation of 11 lakh frozen Karvy demat accounts with assets under management worth Rs 3 crore that were held by NSDL and CDSL

August 19 | Karvy group chairman and promoter C Parthasarathy arrested by CCS of Hyderabad police based on loan default complaint by IndusInd Bank



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Karvy Group chairman held for Rs 137 crore loan default, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


HYDERABAD: Less than two years after markets regulator Securities & Exchange Board of India (Sebi) banned Hyderabad-based broking firm Karvy Stock Broking Ltd (KSBL) for illegally pledging client securities to raise loans against shares, city police arrested KSBL chairman and managing director C Parthasarathy on Thursday based on a loan default complaint by IndusInd Bank.

Two months ago, the bank had registered an FIR sagainst KSBL — which was India’s top broking firms till 2019 — accusing it of defaulting on a loan of Rs 137 crore by pledging its clients’ securities.

Parthasarathy was arrested on charges of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The Karvy Group boss was later produced before the Nampally criminal court, which remanded him to 14 days judicial custody. Police officials said that apart from probing the KSBL loan default to banks, they are also probing the Parthasarathy’s alleged misuse of clients’ funds to the tune of Rs 720 crore parked in KSBL’s trading accounts.

The investigating team of Hyderabad police relied upon details in Sebi’s 2019 orders banning KSBL from broking activities based on a preliminary investigation by National Stock Exchange.

Hyderabad police commissioner Anjani Kumar told mediapersons that Parthasarathy was arrested under Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 418 (cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may ensue to person whose interest offender is bound to protect), 421 (dishonest or fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent distribution among creditors), 422 (dishonestly or fraudulently preventing debt being available for creditors), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent) and 120b (conspiracy) of IPC.

Avinash Mohanty, joint commissioner of police (detective department), Hyderabad police, said the case was registered on the basis of IndusInd Bank’s complaint alleging that KSBL availed credit facilities of Rs 137 crore by pledging shares, along with a personal guarantee from Parthasarathy, by suppressing the fact that the pledged securities belong to KSBL clients. “Without their (clients) consent he misused the power of attorney (given by clients to KSBL for trading purposes),” Mohanty said.

KSBL,which allegedly transferred the securities of its clients into its own demat accounts and pledged them to banks like IndusInd, is also accused of defaulting on loans worth Rs 680 crore that it took from various other banks. KSBL was one of the largest broking firms in India with over 2.5 lakh clients before the scam came to light.

“The accused company became defaulter by diverting the funds into the accounts of its own or connected businesses entities. In November 2019, Sebi revoked the securities pledged with banks and NBFCs and returned the securities to client accounts. The complainant banks were left with no collateral and thereby KSBL defaulted in repayments of about Rs 137 crore to IndusInd,” police said.

Following his arrest, Parthasarathy moved a bail petition in the Nampally criminal court, which is yet to decide on the date of hearing the petition.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Govt appoints Lalit K Chandel on Bank of Maharashtra board, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government has appointed Lalit Kumar Chandel, Economic Adviser, Department of Financial Services, on the board of Bank of Maharashtra. He is appointed as Government of India nominee director on the board with effect from August 18, Bank of Maharashtra said in a statement on Thursday.

Chandel replaced Hrisheekesh Arvind Modak.

Chandel has served at various levels in different departments of Government of India, including banking, insurance, capital markets, external assistance, rural development, power, irrigation and health, it said.

He has held key positions of Director (Insurance), Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance; Executive Director, CVO and Financial Adviser, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, and Whole Time Director Finance, Telangana State Power Generation Corporation. PTI DP



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 189 190 191 192 193 540