BharatPe launches ‘12% Club’ app, eyes $50 mn lending AUM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Fintech firm BharatPe on Tuesday announced its foray into the consumer space with the launch of 12% Club app that will allow consumers to invest and earn up to 12 per cent annual interest or borrow at similar rate.

BharatPe has partnered with RBI-approved NBFCs to offer this investment-cum-borrowing product for consumers, a statement said.

The company, which provides financial services to merchants, aims to achieve an investment AUM (assets under management) of $100 million (about ₹741.8 crore) and a lending AUM of $50 million (about ₹371 crore) from 12% Club by the end of the current fiscal year, it added.

The new product will be available on Google Play Store and Apple App Store.

“Consumers on the 12% Club app can invest their savings anytime by choosing to lend money through BharatPe’s partner P2P NBFCs. Additionally, consumers can avail collateral-free loans of up to ₹10 lakh on the 12% Club for a tenure of 3 months, as per their convenience,” the statement said.

Recently, Cred had also launched CRED Mint – in partnership with Liquiloans (RBI-registered P2P NBFC) – to help its members earn interest of up to 9 per cent per annum by investing between ₹1-10 lakh.

BharatPe said there will be no processing charges or pre-payment charges on the consumer loans, and added that the loan eligibility will be defined based on a number of factors including consumer’s credit score, the shopping history using Payback loyalty system or the payments done via BharatPe QR.

Consumers investing via the app can put in a request to withdraw their investment anytime, partially or completely, without any withdrawal charges. They can start by investing ₹1,000 and the upper limit for investment by an individual is currently set at ₹10 lakh. The company said this would be increased to ₹50 lakh over the next few months.

“As we begin our journey on the consumer side, our focus will be to launch products that are industry shaping, 100 per cent digital and easy to use.

“We believe that 12% Club will strike the right chord with a diverse set of new-age digitally savvy customers- from young salaried individuals, to professionals with disposable incomes, as well as the investors who park their funds in various financial instruments,” BharatPe Chief Executive Officer Suhail Sameer said.

He added that in the pilot phase, the company has seen great traction with ₹5 million of monthly investment run rate and ₹1 million of monthly borrowing run rate.

“We are confident that this product will be well received in the market and will play a key role in driving financial inclusion in the country. This is just the beginning and we will be adding new customer products during the rest of the financial year,” he said.

He noted that BharatPe’s peer-to-peer (P2P) lending product for merchants has gross investments of close to $700 million done by over 6.3 lakh merchants.

“Also, we are one of the largest B2B fintech lenders in the country, having disbursed over USD 300 million in business loans to over 2 lakh merchant partners,” he added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HC directs Kotak Mahindra Bank to ensure at least ₹1.80 crore balance in Afghan Embassy accounts

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Delhi High Court has issued a notice on a plea by a construction company seeking attachment of movable and immovable assets of the Embassy of Afghanistan for payment owed to it. The company’s plea follows the the collapse of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan government and its takeover by the Taliban.

The plea concerns the enforcement of an arbitral award against a foreign State, a matter on which the High Court had earlier ruled that a foreign State cannot seek sovereign immunity in a contract arising out of a commercial transaction.

Also read: India evacuates 168 people from Kabul

The counsel for the decree holder, KLA Construction Technologies Pvt Ltd which had carried out work in the Afghanistan Embassy for a consideration of ₹3.02 crore, submitted before the Court that considering the ongoing political turmoil in Afghanistan, the execution of the award in question had become doubtful due to which it is essential that the properties of the judgment debtor (the embassy) are attached in order to secure the execution of the arbitral award. KLA Technologies informed the Court that the exact amount pending payment pursuant to the arbitral award is ₹1.80 crore. The counsel for the embassy pleaded that they had no instructions and were unable to disclose the assets of the judgment debtor.

‘Unclear situation’

“…Coupled with the fact that the prevalent political situation in Afghanistan is not clear, this Court is left with no option but to take on record the details of the assets of the judgment debtors so furnished on behalf of the decree holder in the present application. Being conscious of the fact that the Special Leave Petition against the judgment dated June 18, 2021 (which held that foreign States cannot claim Sovereign immunity in commercial transactions) is pending consideration before the Supreme Court, to safeguard the interest of the decree holder, the Court directs Kotak Mahindra Bank, Branch D Block, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi to ensure that the total minimum balance in three accounts of judgment debtors shall not be less than ₹1.80 crore,” said Justice Suresh Kumar Kait.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SC directs DoT not to invoke Airtel bank guarantees for non-payment of Videocon’s AGR dues, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the telecom department not to invoke bank guarantees of Bharti Airtel for three weeks over non-payment of adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues of defunct telco Videocon Telecommunications (VTL).

A three-judge bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao allowed Bharti Airtel to go to the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) for relief over the issue.

“We’ve made it clear we will not review the (main AGR) judgement. He (Airtel) wants to file an application. We will allow. He (Airtel) says after dues are added now, so you hold your hands for some time till he goes before TDSAT,” the bench also comprising Justice SA Nazeer and Justice MR Shah told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.

Mehta was arguing that the recovery notice served by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on Airtel was as per the court’s AGR dues order. He added that he would contest the jurisdiction of the TDSAT to decide the issue.

The DoT had issued a demand notice on August 17, 2020, asking Bharti Airtel to pay AGR dues assessed at Rs 1376 crore within a week or have the bank guarantees invoked. The dues were of Videocon Telecommunications, whose spectrum was acquired by the Sunil Mittal-led carrier in 2016. Videocon had sold rights to use spectrum in the 1,800 MHz band in six circles to Airtel in 2016 for Rs 4,428 crore.

The Sunil Mittal-led telco said that it had so far paid the government Rs 18004 crore by way of AGR dues, which was more than 10 percent of dues to have been paid by March 31, 2021, as per the top court’s order. DoT has demanded Rs43,980 crore from Airtel towards AGR dues.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing Airtel, said that Airtel was not responsible for Videocon’s dues on account of the spectrum trading deal as the law states that the ‘seller shall clear all dues prior to concluding any agreement for spectrum trading’.

“Our agreement date is 16th March 2016. I am the buyer and the effective date is 18th May 2016. If there was a liability not known to parties at the time, the government has discretion to recover jointly or severely. In our case, it’s common ground between us that it was known liability, so we are not in the realm of unknown liability,” argued Diwan. “The liability is of Videocon, full liability is of the seller.”

The bench intervened, saying “We know where you are heading, but we are not going to review this judgement.”

To this, Divan responded: “We don’t want to review the judgement.”

He added that Rs1376 crore were Videocon’s dues and must be paid by that company. “In fact, DoT has claimed this from Videocon in insolvency proceedings,” said Divan.

Divan said that DoT’s “precipitate action,” “totally affects our working” and sought a stay on the government’s demand notice.

The DoT had filed an affidavit in the SC in April, 2021, saying that Airtel had refused to pay the AGR-related dues of Videocon, despite its demand.

In its response, Airtel, through letters dated 16.10.2020 and 4.3.2021, said that DoT’s demand has “no basis in law” and that Airtel cannot be held responsible for Videocon’s past dues given that the buyer of spectrum is not responsible for dues which were ‘known’ at the time of trade.

As per the DoT affidavit, Airtel added that contrary to its current stance, DoT had never raised such demand from Airtel in the past and maintained its position that these dues were solely recoverable from Videocon.

“…given the clear and categorical findings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the trading guidelines issued by DoT and DoT’s own understanding, along with the fact that such demand was never raised on Airtel, is ample testimony to the fact that Airtel is not liable for any outstanding dues of Videocon pertaining to the outstanding AGR dues. i.e. License Fees and Spectrum Usage Charges of M/S Videocon,” Airtel said, as per the DoT affidavit.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Barclays’ Bajoria says a lot of inflation risks priced in now, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A lot has been said about recent inflationary trends in India with the Reserve Bank of India, for a long period, being caught between reining in elevated price pressures and doing all it can to revive economic growth. The central bank would undoubtedly have gained some solace from the fact that in July, the headline retail inflation dropped below the upper band of its 2-6% range for the first time in three months. Rahul Bajoria, Chief India Economist at Barclays, believes that there could be more reasons for cheer as according to him, early price trends seem to suggest that inflation could undershoot the RBI’s forecast. Edited excerpts:

In the backdrop of the RBI’s recent reiteration of policy support for economic growth and signs of improvement in high frequency indicators, what is your outlook on the growth-inflation mix?
The August policy meeting was in a way a mirror reflection of what happened in April, except that the growth and inflation risks were sort of interchanged.
In this particular meeting, it was evident that you are going to have lesser risks to your growth outlook because the economy was opening up.

Inflation out-turns have been greater than what the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had been forecasting. so the natural bias was to say that inflation risks are tilted to the upside.

In terms of the broad policy stance, there is uncertainty going forward about whether we will have a third wave, and what kind of impact a possible third wave can have on our growth momentum. There are many questions – what does that mean for inflation, for supply dynamics, potential return of supply shocks to the inflation trajectory?

The fact that there is some improvement in the macro data has been well acknowledged by the RBI, I think the bias was clearly towards that.

But they are still grappling with the lingering uncertainty and that’s why it is very difficult for the RBI to really commit itself in the direction of normalisation.

We look at the new variable reverse repo rate (VRRR) as a step towards probably more balanced liquidity. It is not a new instrument. We have had VRRR in the system since January this year and there has not really been any commensurate material tightening of liquidity.

There have been periods when liquidity has shrunk, excess liquidity has come down but it is not really necessarily a step towards normalising. You could say it is a step, but it is a very gradual step. Our sense is that by the time we reach the October policy meeting, a lot of these variables will probably clear up and we will have a better sense of the direction.

But the broad message we took away from this meeting was that unless and until there is absolute clarity on the growth outlook, it is difficult to see how RBI will move towards a confident approach to normalising monetary conditions.

The preference for supporting growth over managing inflation is very clear and that comes across both in terms of the guidance from the MPC and from the RBI governor himself.

There has been much talk of the extent to which the liquidity surplus in the banking system has expanded over the last couple of months. It is true that the traditional channel of strong demand for credit is not really functioning at the present juncture. Are there any risks of overheating which are emanating from liquidity?
Not really. I would say the general sense of overheating is not there. I could possibly talk about the equity valuations and the governor has spoken on this issue but equity valuations are a function of flows and the flow dynamic in India has remained pretty strong.

Obviously there has been some excitement around the IPO cycle but that comes and goes. It is more of a seasonal thing. But when you look at say credit growth, you look at credit demand in the system, you look at capacity utilisation, a lot of these numbers are looking tepid and that is one of the reasons why I think the RBI may take some comfort in the fact that there are no real incipient signs of demand side pressures in the system.

Maybe they will emerge in six months as the economy normalises further but then there is no reason for the RBI to be really worried about major trouble spots being formed right away.

With the exception of equities, there is no other asset market in India which is doing outstandingly well, whether you look at the property sector, you look at say demand for gold, etc, that is not really showing any signs of major shift away from financial assets into fiscal assets and that I think will be taken as a sign as well by the RBI that maybe this excess liquidity in the system is not really causing dislocations that cannot be managed in the future through policy actions whether it is through rates or through macro prudential steps.

What, in your view, are the factors contributing to inflation expectations in India?
I would say that quite a few of the indicators which would typically drive inflation expectations in India — food prices, milk prices, vegetable prices, fuel prices, school fees — typically tend to increase at this time.

But, the sustainability of elevated inflation expectation has to be driven by some sustained improvement in demand because the flip side of this issue of inflation expectation is that when we look at the producer prices and what is happening with retail inflation, especially when we look at the PMI data — these input prices have been elevated for a long time as commodity prices globally have been rising.

We have seen input cost increase but output prices actually have remained very tepid.

There is a big gap between the imported price pressures and what the domestic price pressure story is telling.

This can be interpreted in two ways. One is that these increases in input costs are not going to materialise into higher output prices because pricing power is weak and demand is weak. If you do have a big demand revival, three-six months down the line, these price pressures can be translated into output prices.

Given the spirit of the K-shaped recovery, it will be very difficult to say that these are generalised price pressures. There will be a combination of some sectors seeing higher prices but certain sectors might not really see any major spillovers coming through. It will be difficult to navigate that kind of an environment which makes forecasting inflation a tad more difficult than what you would think of in a normal cycle.

The recent inflation print was less than 6%. Could this trend persist with more and more supply constraints loosening?
I think so. A lot of inflation risks are now already priced in, so basically it is within the forecast that the RBI has. What is very interesting is that we have always maintained that the current bout of inflation has been imported in nature. It is because of higher commodity prices whether food or whether it is fuel prices and a lot of imported food commodities.

Cooking oil is a primary example; meat prices have been elevated. We have to think of it from the perspective of levels versus rate of inflation and what we are seeing is that sequentially quite a few of these pressure points particularly are starting to dissipate. They are not falling aggressively month on month, but they are also no longer increasing 3-4%. There will be some level of comfort being derived from that front.

We think we are likely to see an undershooting of the inflation forecast. In our tracker we had come out with a number of 5.5% for the month of August, obviously it is still a bit early but price trends are indicating that it is not going to be closer to 6%.

Taking this forward, do you have any sort of internal estimate as to by when the RBI would start normalising policy?
We have been saying very consistently that the RBI will not have any kind of a front loaded normalisation cycle.
There is no real room for pre-emptive behaviour on their part because the growth picture does not clear up until very late in the fiscal year. We think that once the RBI has clarity on growth and that could mean they are looking at certain level of vaccinations, the global growth picture and signs of investment revival, or it could be a combination of these data points. The earliest we think the RBI could start hiking the reverse repo is in December.

It could be as early as December but in all likelihood, we do not think repo rate hikes will come into the picture anytime before the first quarter of the next fiscal year. It could either be the April or the June meeting depending on what the growth assessment is but it is not going to be a frontloaded action. Our sense is that the market also may be overpricing the extent of normalisation because unlike previous instances, we do not think the RBI is going to undertake a big normalisation.

We think that 2022 is probably the year when more signs of organic growth might start to return in the system and it will probably make the RBI a little bit more confident when they think about the normalisation cycle.Rahul Bajoria

RBI will probably have two repo rate hikes in 2022 and that is it! We are not going to see any further hikes from them because by that time the rate of inflation should also be slowing down and so the gap between the nominal policy rates and inflation is going to close as well. It is not like they are going to be aggressively hiking once they start normalising.

How will the next few months play out for the sovereign bond market? The RBI has permitted some degree of a rise in yields. What is your takeaway?
I think so in the sense that obviously there are two parts of the liquidity management strategy which is directly in control of the RBI; it involves domestic balance sheet growth, which is them buying bonds or calibrating currency in circulation requirements in the system.

The second is the FX reserves story which is not completely in control of the RBI but they tend to have some say in the way flows are being sterilised and whether we have sterilised or unsterilised FX intervention or the RBI can choose the level and the quantity of dollars they buy.

Here the general bias of RBI has been to go for growth and liquidity at a reasonably robust pace. Maybe at a later stage, that preference starts to tweak. But I do not think we are looking at any major inorganic steps on their part to draw down the liquidity.

Ideally what you want to see is that growth picks up, demand for currency, demand for credit picks up in the system and there is a bit of a runway for RBI to start normalising its liquidity in the system. We do not really see them aggressively stepping into take out liquidity right because that in itself could be in a 65 bps rate hike.

I would say the operating rate goes from the reverse repo to the repo and if they do that, it means that they are very confident about the growth outlook.

What do you think is going to be the general trend for the rupee this financial year?
Broadly speaking, the current account has seen the big delta swing between 2019 and 2020 and now in 2021 relative to 2020. The current account has gone from small deficit to a small surplus to a small deficit and this obviously has some implications for our reserve accretion strategy but what is reasonably evident is that our balance of payments is going to remain in a pretty decent size surplus right.

The size of monthly surpluses are coming down without doubt, but it is still going to be in a surplus and over the next six to 12 months, the flows are probably going to be a lot more evenly matched then what they were say in the last 12 months. From that perspective, it could mean that RBI’s reserve accretion strategy is going to carry on.

We also think the central bank has clearly been running down its forward book in order to build more reserves. So, there has been this trade off between forward reserves being traded off for current spot reserves and there is quite a bit of signalling effect from when we think about the global monetary policy cycle.

RBI clearly is going to lag any normalisation that is already underway. Within the emerging market, central banks of countries like Brazil has been hiking rates; Mexico has hiked rates, South Africa is talking about hiking rates. India is not doing that.

We will do that next year but we are not going to do that now but then the external pressure points are very limited for us because there is no imminent risk of large scale depreciation happening in the rupee because we are not keeping pace with the real rates kind of a framework.

Now within the domestic policy, both in the context of say the Aatmanirbhar Bharat programme and the PLI scheme, general interventionary trends that we have seen shows a bias for a stable to a slightly weaker rupee.

India’s fuel prices are not high only because of weaker currency or higher commodity prices. There is a taxation component to it which shows that there is a preference not to use the FX in order to lean into the inflation pressures. Our sense is that the rupee should generally find conditions to be stable with such a backdrop.

What are your estimates for GDP growth? When can we see a sustainable recovery?
We are sitting at about 9.2% for the current fiscal year and at the moment, we are picking up two clear messages from the data. First of all, the extent of growth loss or activity loss that was being estimated by us and generally by the markets as well appears to be much less. I do not think we really are in a position to predict whether a third wave happens or not.

We are not building any major impact of the third wave beyond the usual cyclical weaknesses. That sort of evens out the realised better activity levels with future risks of some loss coming. If we do not have the third wave, I would think there are very clear upside biases to our growth and we could even be again looking at maybe double digit GDP growth numbers in the current fiscal and it will be one recovery which is pretty much driven by the base effect and you are seeing normalisation of activity.

What would be very interesting to see is what happens with the 2022 growth story because right at the beginning of this year, a lot of analysts and a lot of people on the policy making side as well were getting pretty excited about maybe a new capex cycle emerging. Demand conditions were looking quite good and obviously the Budget added to that positivity. That optimism may start to have some effect on the 2020 story.

I would not say we are very bullish but we certainly think that India’s growth momentum can sustain into 2022 which will have a one leg of support coming from the investment cycle as well.

We think that 2022 is probably the year when more signs of organic growth might start to return in the system and it will probably make the RBI a little bit more confident when they think about the normalisation cycle. But then given that there are several risk factors around it, we are not exactly thumping the table but can see that happening as a pretty realistic likelihood. The probability of that turning out to be true appears reasonably high to us.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank allots over 16.73 cr shares in Rs 2,500 cr QIP, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State-run Canara Bank on Tuesday said it has approved allotment of over 16.73 crore shares in the Rs 2,500 crore qualified institutions placement (QIP) that closed a day earlier. The QIP opened on August 17 and closed on August 23, 2021.

The sub-committee of the board, capital planning process of the board of directors of the bank, at its meeting held on August 24, 2021, approved the allotment of 16,73,92,032 equity shares to eligible qualified institutional buyers at an issue price of Rs 149.35 per equity share, aggregating up to Rs 2,500 crore, Canara Bank said in a regulatory filing.

With this, the paid-up equity share capital of the bank stands increased to Rs 1,814.13 crore from Rs 1,646.74 crore, it said.

A total of seven investors have been allotted more than 5 per cent of the equity offered in the QIP issue, said the Bengaluru-based lender.

LIC subscribed to 15.91 per cent; BNP Paribas Arbitrage 12.55 per cent; Societe Generale 7.97 per cent; Indian Bank and ICICI Prudential Life Insurance – 6.37 per cent each.

Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte-ODI bought 6.16 per cent of the shares issued in QIP and Volrado Venture Partners Fund II 6.05 per cent.

Canara Bank stock traded at Rs 154.80 apiece on BSE, up by 1.31 per cent from its previous close. PTI KPM ANS ANS



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI panel pushes for merger of weaker Urban Co-operative Banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Weak urban co-operative banks (UCBs) could get a regulatory nudge to explore voluntary merger or conversion into a non-banking society at an early stage, going by the recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India’s Expert Committee on UCBs. Else, the powers for mandatory resolution would be employed.

The committee, headed by NS Vishwanathan, a former Deputy Governor of the RBI, emphasised that all-inclusive directions (AID) should be treated on a par with moratorium under Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act.

If AID is imposed, a bank should not continue thereunder beyond the time permitted to keep a bank under moratorium — three months extendable by a maximum of another three months.

Mandatory resolution

This recommendation is significant as some UCBs have been under AID for many years, causing lot of hardship to depositors as deposit withdrawals are capped. Currently, about 50 UCBs are under AID.

In view of the powers derived from the recent amendment to the Banking Regulation Act, the committee observed that the RBI may strive to begin the mandatory resolution process including reconstruction or compulsory merger as soon as a UCB reaches Stage III under the Supervisory Action Framework (SAF).

The RBI may also consider superseding the board if the bank fails to submit a merger/conversion proposal within the prescribed timeframe and take steps to avoid undue flight of deposits once the news becomes public. A Stage III UCB is one where its capital to risk-weighted assets ratio/CRAR is less than 4.5 per cent and/or net non-performing assets/NNPAs is greater than 12 per cent.

Amalgamation

The committee felt that the RBI can prepare a scheme of compulsory amalgamation or reconstruction of UCBs, like banking companies.

The action may include compulsory amalgamation with another banking institution or a transfer of assets and liabilities to another financial institution. In such cases, the existing members of the transferor UCB may be disenfranchised for five years.

The amalgamation or reconstruction scheme may include reduction in the rights of creditors, including depositors and members of the bank; or payment in cash or in any other manner to depositors/creditors in respect of their entire claims or reduced claims, as the case may be.

The relevant section of the Banking Regulation Act also offers flexibility to allot shares/long-term debt instruments of the transferee bank (acquiring bank) to the depositors/ creditors/members without reducing their claims.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HDFC Bank looks to regain credit card market share in 3-4 quarters

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private sector lender HDFC Bank hopes to regain its market share in the credit card business in the next three to four quarters after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) lifted curbs on the lender from sourcing new customers.

The bank plans to issue three lakh credit cards per month from next month, which will gradually be raised to five lakh issuances per month, said Parag Rao, Group Head – Payments, Consumer Finance, Digital Banking and IT, HDFC Bank, on Monday, in a virtual press conference.

New initiatives

Rao pointed out that although the bank lost its market share by a number of cards, it was able to maintain the market share on initiatives taken to prod users to spend.

“HDFC Bank has over 20 initiatives which will hit the market in the next six to nine months to drive this growth,” the lender said in a statement, adding that these include the launch of new co-branded cards with the who’s who of corporate India, spanning sectors like pharma, travel, FMCG, hospitality, telecom, and fintech.

The bank has also revamped its existing range of cards over the past nine months and is also ready with strategic partnerships with new companies, it further said.

The RBI had on August 17 relaxed the restriction placed on the private sector lender on sourcing of new credit cards, which it had imposed eight months earlier in December 2020.

The lender will depend on its internal set of customers to grow the number of cards and is also looking at partner with key players like Paytm to increase its sourcing.

The conservative approach on the credit front will continue for the bank even as it goes aggressively on the new business sourcing, Rao said.

Despite the ban, the bank has maintained its leadership position in the credit card segment over the past eight months and has about 3.67 crore debit cards, 1.48 crore credit cards, and about 21.34 lakh acceptance points.

However, it has lost about 6 lakh cards since the date of embargo while competitors like ICICI Bank, SBI Cards, and Axis Bank have gained more customers.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank allots over 16.73 cr shares in ₹2,500 cr QIP

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State-run Canara Bank on Tuesday said it has approved allotment of over 16.73 crore shares in the ₹2,500 crore qualified institutions placement (QIP) that closed a day earlier.

The QIP opened on August 17 and closed on August 23, 2021.

The sub-committee of the board, capital planning process of the Board of Directors of the bank, at its meeting held on August 24, 2021, approved the allotment of 16,73,92,032 equity shares to eligible qualified institutional buyers at an issue price of ₹149.35 per equity share, aggregating up to ₹2,500 crore, Canara Bank said in a regulatory filing.

With this, the paid-up equity share capital of the bank stands increased to ₹1,814.13 crore from ₹1,646.74 crore, it said.

A total of seven investors have been allotted more than 5 per cent of the equity offered in the QIP issue, said the Bengaluru-based lender.

LIC subscribed to 15.91 per cent; BNP Paribas Arbitrage 12.55 per cent; Societe Generale 7.97 per cent; Indian Bank and ICICI Prudential Life Insurance – 6.37 per cent each.

Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte-ODI bought 6.16 per cent of the shares issued in QIP and Volrado Venture Partners Fund II 6.05 per cent.

Canara Bank stock traded at ₹154.80 apiece on BSE, up by 1.31 per cent from its previous close.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

High attrition, provisioning to weigh on Ujjivan Small Finance Bank after MD’s exit, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


High provisions and uncertainty over the appointment of a new managing director will weigh on the valuation of Ujjivan Small Finance Bank in the near future following the abrupt exit of current MD Nitin Chugh, according to analysts.

The stock has dropped 31% in the last one month and is currently trading at around Rs 19,

However, during the conference call with analysts, the management sounded confident about tackling the issue, with the help of new board members, appointment of a special officer and interim CEO for better coordination between the board and business teams, according to analysts.

Asset quality issues

Chugh’s resignation comes at a time when the company is grappling with asset quality problems. The CFO had also resigned a month ago. Ujjivan SFB could see more near-term correction, with a KMP resigning. Compared to listed peers, USFB saw more stress formation, as indicated by the spike in gross non-performing asset coupled with existing and likely restructuring. This may suggest that asset quality pain for Ujjivan SFB has not ended yet and the bank could see more balance sheet stress emanating. During more stable times, overall gross stress was 1% of loans that surged to 15.3% in Q1FY22 in wake of the pandemic, as GNPA further escalated to 9.8% with restructuring being at 5.5% of loans.

Chugh’s tenure

When he assumed the office of the MD & CEO in December 2019 Ujjivan faced four major challenges, — hold-co dilution, opex control, retail deposit build-up, and improving secured loan share. The bank was on path to sort three of these four issues. On the hold-co dilution issue, the RBI via letter dated 9th July 2021 permitted SFBs and holding companies to apply for reverse merger, which signalled that UFSL could be reverse merged with Ujjivan SFB. During Chugh’s tenure, the bank did well on deposits, as CASA ratio consistently increased from 11.6% in Q3FY20 to 20.3% in Q1FY22. Opex was also controlled, with opex to assets in FY21 seeing a sharp reduction to 6.2% from 8.2% in FY20. While transition towards a secured loan profile was progressing, with secured share rising from 21% to 32% on a YoY basis in Q1FY22, material exposure (estimated 80% of loans) to MFI and secured SME severely affected asset quality.

Asset quality challenges for Ujjivan SFB

Collection efficiency (CE) dropped sharply in May/June 2021 to 72%/78% which improved to 93% in July 2021. In June, collections in the South/East were 63%/78% compared to 92%/83% in North/West. Under OTR-1, CE that was 75% dropped to 33%/37% in May 2021/Jun’21, which improved to 50% in July 2021. 150,000 customers, who were NPAs as of June 2021 started paying in July and saw overall upgrades of Rs 300 crore excluding restructuring. Restructured pool stood at Rs 780 crore (5.5% of loans versus 5.8% last quarter) and further Rs 500 crore entered one-time restructuring (OTR) in July 2021. Additionally, Rs 300 crore could enter OTR by September 2021. However, total restructuring could be somewhat less than Rs 1,600 crore, as there could be an overlap between OTR-1 and OTR-2. Gross stress as at Q1FY22 was 15%, with a cover of 60% (was 13% last quarter, with a 50% cover).

Valuation, view and risks

“Resignation of a key managerial personnel could lead to near-term pressure until someone is appointed, though stress formation is partly priced in. We had downgraded FY22E earnings by 76% due to loss in Q1FY22 and likely provisions in FY22. MFI/MSE loan exposure at 80% is affecting USFB, leading to stress build-up and protracted recoveries,” Centrum Broking said in a report.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI panel, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Well governed large urban cooperative banks (UCBs) which meet parameters should be allowed to function along the lines of small finance banks (SFBs) and universal banks, a Reserve Bank of India (RBI)-appointed expert panel has suggested.

The four-tiered structure

A Reserve Bank-appointed committee has suggested a four-tier structure for UCBs depending upon the deposits and prescribed different capital adequacy and regulatory norms for them based on their sizes.

The RBI committee said that UCBs can be split into four categories — Tier-1 with deposits up to Rs 100 crore; Tier-2 with deposits between Rs 100-Rs 1,000 crore, Tier-3 with deposits between Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 10,000 and Tier-4 with deposits of over Rs 10,000 crore.

It suggested that the minimum Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) for them could vary from 9 per cent to 15 per cent and for Tier-4 UCBs the Basel III prescribed norms.

The panel said tier-3 urban cooperative banks with deposits of Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 10,000 crore must function like SFBs if they meet a capital adequacy ratio of 15%. The loan portfolio of tier-3 urban cooperative banks shall conform to the stipulations made for SFBs, it added.

Tier-4 UCBs with deposits of over Rs 10,000 crore should be allowed to function like universal banks if they meet the 9% capital adequacy ratio requirement, leverage ratio and has a fit and proper board and chief executive. Such UCBs can be given operational freedom for branch expansion and authorized dealer licence on a par with universal banks.

Smaller UCBs with deposits of up to ₹100 crore will be categorized as tier-1 UCBs and those with deposits of ₹100-1,000 crore will be categorized as tier-2 UCBs.

The RBI panel has also prescribed separate ceilings for home loans, loan against gold ornaments and unsecured loans for different categories of UCBs.

In February, the RBI had the constitution of the Expert Committee on Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks under the chairmanship of N S Vishwanathan, former RBI Deputy Governor.

Mergers of UCBs

The committee emphasised that all-inclusive directions (AID) should be treated on a par with moratorium under Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act.

If AID is imposed, a bank should not continue thereunder beyond the time permitted to keep a bank under moratorium — three months extendable by a maximum of another three months.

Currently about 50 UCBs are under AID, causing lot of hardship to depositors as deposit withdrawals are capped.

On consolidation of UCBs, the panel said that RBI should be largely neutral to voluntary consolidation except where it is suggested as a supervisory action.

“However, the RBI should not hesitate to use the route of mandatory merger to resolve UCBs that do not meet the prudential requirements after giving them an opportunity to come up with voluntary solutions,” it said.

The minimum capital stipulation provides an embedded size to a UCB.

The committee said that under the Banking Regulation (BR) Act, the RBI can prepare scheme of compulsory amalgamation or reconstruction of UCBs, like banking companies.

This may be resorted to when the required voluntary actions are not forthcoming or leading to desired results.

The panel further said Supervisory Action Framework (SAF) should follow a twin-indicator approach — it should consider only asset quality and capital measured through NNPA and CRAR — instead of triple indicators at present. The objective of the SAF should be to find a time-bound remedy to the financial stress of a bank.

If a UCB remains under more stringent stages of SAF for a prolonged period, it may have an adverse effect on its operations and may further erode its financial position, it said.

The RBI may also consider superseding the board if the bank fails to submit a merger/conversion proposal within the prescribed timeframe and take steps to avoid undue flight of deposits once the news becomes public. A Stage III UCB is one where its capital to risk-weighted assets ratio/CRAR is less than 4.5 per cent and/or net non-performing assets/NNPAs is greater than 12 per cent.

Housing loans

On housing loans, the panel said the maximum limit on housing loans may be prescribed as a percentage of Tier 1 capital, subject to RBI-prescribed monetary ceiling for Tier 1 UCBs (but higher than the present ceiling) and respective board of directors-approved ceiling for Tier 2 UCBs.

For Tier 2 UCBs, the risk weight on housing loans may be prescribed based on size of the loan and loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, in line with SCBs.

The panel has also made recommendations regarding loan against gold ornaments with bullet repayment option.

It also said that umbrella organisation (UO) is expected to play a crucial role in the strengthening of the sector.

For that, it must be a financially strong organisation with adequate capital and a viable business plan. The minimum capital for the UO should be Rs 300 crore with CRAR and regulatory framework akin to the largest segment of NBFCs, the panel said.

Alos, in the long run, the UO may take up the role of a Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for smaller UCBs.

The report said there were two broad sources of constraints because of which the sector has underperformed.

The first set of factors are internal to the sector. Many UCBs are small and do not have either the capability – financial or human resources – and/or possibly inclination to provide technology enabled financial services.

The second set of constraints are external to the banks. These emanate from the rather restrictive regulatory environment under which they have had to operate.

There were suggestions that licensing of new UCBs should be immediately opened up. There are over 1,500 UCBs already. The committee has suggested that the existing UCBs may be allowed to expand their footprint.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 184 185 186 187 188 540