Fresh tax notices to FPIs over capital gains, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The I-T department has asked multiple foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) to cough up more taxes on their capital gains after denying set-off and tax treaty benefits, people aware of the development said. The notices were issued by the Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) of the I-T department under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act.

The intimation under Section 143(1) informs taxpayers about initial assessments carried out by the tax department and points out discrepancies in tax filings, and demands additional taxes, if any.

Intimations demanding additional taxes primarily cited three reasons, the sources said. Either the FPIs have been disallowed to set off long-term capital gains against short-term capital losses, or the tax department has not taken tax treaties into consideration, or, in some cases, it has categorised short-term capital losses incurred by FPIs as gains, they claimed.

Many tax experts suspect that this could just be a technical glitch in the system, but even so the FPIs will now have to approach either the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or litigate the matter.

“The law allows long-term capital gains to be set off against short-term capital losses,” said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner at Deloitte India. “If such set-offs are denied, it could result in significant tax demands for FPIs, requiring them to litigate the matter. Hopefully this is a technical glitch and would be rectified soon.”

In other cases, the tax department has not taken tax treaties into consideration while demanding tax from FPIs. All FPIs that are covered by India’s bilateral tax treaties and attract much lower taxes – of 10% to 15% – than if they are not protected through tax treaties.

In several other cases, the tax department has categorised short-term capital losses incurred by FPIs as gains, sources said. So, instead of getting deductions on such amounts, they have been asked to cough up taxes.

“Taxpayers have raised concerns with respect to the Centralised Processing Centre erroneously treating short-term capital loss as short-term capital gains and taxing the same,” said Sameer Gupta at EY India. “There have been other issues, too, around gains which were subject to tax at 50% of the domestic tax rate,” he said.

“The remedial measures adopted by taxpayers for the above include filing of rectification application and also parallelly seeking recourse through an appellate process,” Gupta said. ET could not independently verify whether the tax notices were a result of a technical glitch or change in stance or any other issue related to FPIs. An email query sent to the CBDT and the FM did not elicit any response as of press time Thursday.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank classifies 2 Srei grp a/cs as NPA, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State-owned Indian Bank has classified two accounts of Srei Group, worth Rs 1,800 crore, as non-performing assets (NPAs) as on the September-ended quarter 2021. Its net profit has grown more than doubled at Rs 1,089 crore in the second quarter, as compared to Rs 412 crore in the same period last year.

Its MD & CEO Shanti Lal Jain said the profit was driven by growth in non-interest income, (other income), which grew by 26% YoY and 8% QoQ. “It stood at Rs 1,966 crore as against Rs 1,558 crore in the second quarter, on account of increase in recovery of bad debts and forex income,” Jain said.

However, the bank’s net interest income declined by 1% YoY and 2% QoQ to Rs 4,084 crore in the September quarter, 2021.

The public sector bank said we have recognized eight accounts as NPA (bad loans) worth Rs 1,900 crore, which are to be given to the National Asset Reconstruction Company (bad bank). He said “We have already made 50% of provisions for those eight accounts.”

Provisions and contingencies allocated to cover bad loans lowered to Rs 2,187 crore in this quarter, as against Rs 2,530 crore for the corresponding period last year, and Rs 2,234 crore sequentially.

Gross NPA ratio stood at 9.56% in September 2021, marginally lower from 9.89% in September, 2020. The net NPA ratio stood at 3.26%, higher from 2.96% in the same period.

The bank’s fresh slippages declined to Rs 3,952 crore compared to Rs 4,204 crore in the June quarter. Fresh slippage was high due to Corporate loans and crop loans.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Uco Bank posts 7-fold jump in Q2 net, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector lender Uco Bank has reported a seven-fold jump in its net profit to Rs 205.3 crore for the second quarter this fiscal from Rs 30.1 crore for the same period last fiscal.

The city-based lender, which recently came out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) measure of Reserve Bank of India, has witnessed a significant improvement in its asset quality during the second quarter despite the fact that it recognized its exposure of around Rs 1,000 crore in Srei Infrastructure Finance and Srei Equipment Finance as non-performing assets (NPAs).

The Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) earlier this month gave its approval to start insolvency proceedings against Srei Infrastructure Finance and its wholly-owned subsidiary Srei Equipment Finance after the Reserve Bank of India had filed insolvency applications against the two non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).

Uco Bank MD & CEO AK Goel, without mentioning the name of Srei, said, “It will be very premature to talk about the bad loan recovery from these two NBFCs. But we will remain optimistic that a good recovery should come (through insolvency resolution process).”

During the second quarter, the bank’s NPAs in absolute terms fell 3.6% quarter-on-quarter to Rs 10,909.7 crore from Rs 11,321.7 crore in the first quarter this fiscal. The Gross NPA ratio during the quarter under review declined 39 basis points sequentially at 8.9%.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks made Rs 9,700 crore in hidden exchange rate markups on currency conversions, payments and card sales and Rs 16,600 crore on forex transaction fees in 2020, according to a new study.

While the overall amount Indians have spent on transaction fees for sending money abroad has decreased over the past five years, the fees paid to exchange rate margins are growing. “This highlights lack of transparency in remittance fee structures, putting consumers at risk of hidden fees as they unknowingly pay more than advertised for the remittance service in the form of a marked up exchange rate,” said Wise, which released the study.

Undisclosed markup

The upfront fee can vary but would often not represent the total cost of the transaction as traditional banks and providers tend to add an undisclosed markup on the exchange rate, instead of using the fair, mid-market rate. The difference between the rates results in a hidden fee unnecessarily costs people a lot more when sending money abroad.

Fee reduction

Banks have been reducing the fees on foreign remittances and their income under this head fell from Rs 15,017 crore in 2016 to Rs 12,142 crore in 2019.

However, they have protected themselves by recovering Rs 4,422 crore through exchange mark-up in 2020, which was up from Rs 2,505 crore in 2016.

These figures were from independent research carried out by Capital Economics in August 2021, which aimed to estimate the scale of foreign exchange transaction fees in India.

Overseas workers lose

Overseas workers sending money to India are also losing money. Over the past five years, money lost to exchange rate margins on inward remittances has grown from Rs 4,200 crore to Rs 7,900 crore. Meanwhile, fees paid to transaction costs have grown from Rs 10,200 crore in 2016 to Rs 14,000 crore in 2020.

Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020

Of total fees paid on inward remittances to India in 2020, Saudi Arabia ranked first at 24%, followed by the US (18%), the UK (15%), Qatar (8%), Canada (6%), Oman (5%), (5%), Kuwait (5%), and Australia (4%).

Indian consumers spending abroad paid Rs 1,441 crore as transactions fees, of which Rs 1,303 crore were hidden charges in the form of exchange mark-up.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UCO Bank Q2 net soars nearly 7-fold, asset quality improves

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


During a virtual press conference after declaring the results, Uco Bank MD & CEO AK Goel, without mentioning the name of Srei, said, “It will be very premature to talk about the bad loan recovery from the two NBFCs. But, we will remain optimistic that a good recovery should come (through insolvency resolution process).”

Buoyed by an increase in operating profit and a decrease in provisions, state-run Uco Bank on Thursday reported a nearly sevenfold year-on-year jump in its net profit to Rs 205.39 crore for the second quarter this fiscal from Rs 30.12 crore for the same period last fiscal.

The city-based lender, which recently came out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) measure of Reserve Bank of India, showed a significant improvement in its asset quality during the second quarter despite the fact that it recognised its exposure of around Rs 1,000 crore in Srei Infrastructure Finance and Srei Equipment Finance as non-performing assets (NPAs).

The Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) earlier this month gave its approval to start insolvency proceedings against Srei Infrastructure Finance and its wholly-owned subsidiary Srei Equipment Finance after the RBI had filed insolvency applications against the two non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).

During a virtual press conference after declaring the results, Uco Bank MD & CEO AK Goel, without mentioning the name of Srei, said, “It will be very premature to talk about the bad loan recovery from the two NBFCs. But, we will remain optimistic that a good recovery should come (through insolvency resolution process).”

During the second quarter, the bank’s NPAs in absolute terms fell 3.64% quarter-on-quarter to Rs 10,909.79 crore from Rs 11,321.76 crore in the first quarter this fiscal. The Gross NPA ratio during the quarter under review declined 39 basis points sequentially at 8.98%.

Provision for NPAs declined 35.3% y-o-y to Rs 1,032.14 crore in Q2FY22 as against Rs 1,595.39 crore during Q2FY21.

Operating profit during the period grew 24% y-o-y to Rs 1,334.16 crore. Net interest income (NII) grew 14.68% y-o-y to Rs 1,597.73 crore, while non-interest income saw a 31.37% y-o-y growth at Rs 936.07 crore.

The lender’s domestic net interest margin (NIM) improved marginally to 2.9% from 2.88% during the corresponding quarter last fiscal. The bank expects its NIM to further improve to around 3% by the end of this fiscal.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank Q2 net profit jumps 164% to Rs 1,089 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


On the asset quality front, the gross NPA decreased by 13 bps on q-o-q basis, net NPA reduced by 21 bps to 3.26 % from 3.47 % q-o-q. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.88%.

Chennai-based public sector lender Indian Bank on Thursday reported a 164% jump in its net profit at Rs 1,089 crore for the second quarter of FY22 as against Rs 412 crore in the year-ago period. Total income stood at Rs 11,440 crore as against Rs 11,616 crore, registering a marginal decline.

Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, Indian Bank, told mediapersons that increase in other income and reduction in provisioning have helped the bank post profits in the second quarter.

On the asset quality front, the gross NPA decreased by 13 bps on q-o-q basis, net NPA reduced by 21 bps to 3.26 % from 3.47 % q-o-q. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.88%.

Jain said the fresh slippages were lesser at Rs 3, 952 crore as compared to Rs 4,204 crore in Q1FY22. Cash recovery was higher at Rs 831 crore and AUC (advance under collection) recovery was higher at Rs 775 crore compared to Q1. Fresh slippage as compared to y-o-y, was high due to corporate loans and crop loans.

Retail, agriculture and MSME (RAM) advances grew by 14%, 16% and 8%, respectively. RAM sector grew by 13%. Its contribution to domestic advances was at 60%, he said.

Net interest income (NII) declined by 1% y-o-y basis to Rs 4,084 crore from Rs 4,144 crore. However, on q-o-q sequential basis, it grew by 2%. The net interest margin (NIM) improved by 4 basis points (bps) on q-o-q sequential basis. It stood at 2.89% for Q2FY22 as against 3.06% for Q2FY21.

Non-interest income went up by 26% y-o-y and 8% q-o-q. It stood at Rs 1,966 crore as against Rs 1,558 crore in Q2FY21 on account of increase in recovery of bad debts (450%) and forex income (42%).

Advances grew by 5% to Rs 3, 85,730 crore from Rs 3,65,896 crore, primarily driven by growth in RAM sector (13%). RAM constitutes 60% of the total advances. The bank has focused on capital light growth in credit.

Total deposits grew by 10% to Rs 5, 51, 472 crore as against Rs 5, 01, 956 crore.

Current account savings account CASA deposits grew by 8% to Rs 2,25,309 crore. The share of CASA to total deposits stood at 41% while current account deposits grew by 14% and savings account deposits by 8%. Total business recorded a 8% growth, reaching the level of Rs 9, 37, 202 crore as against Rs 8,67,852 crore. On a sequential q-o-q basis, it increased by 1%.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Will focus on retail, corporate sectors for credit growth: Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, Indian Bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Currently, the bank has RAM-corporate split of 60:40, it may be go up or down 5%.

Indian Bank has more than doubled its net profit for the second quarter and said the focus areas would be improving CASA, quality advances, increasing fee-based income, improving collection efficiency, recovery of NPAs and digitisation. Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, says the bank is adequately capitalised and does not need to raise any funds in near future. Excerpts from his virtual interaction with media.

How do you review Q2 in terms credit growth?

Gross credit of the bank has increased by 5%, led by the retail, agri and MSME (RAM) segment which constitutes 60% of the loan book. Our retail loan growth was around 14%, agri 16% and MSME 8%. RAM as a sector grew by 13%. There was a marginal decrease in corporate loan which was because of under-utilisation of limits being leveraged by the corporates.

Currently, our business growth is around 5% and we think that going forward, it should be between 8% and 10%. We will be looking for opportunities in both the RAM and corporate sectors for lending. Currently, the bank has RAM-corporate split of 60:40, it may be go up or down 5%.

What is your views on the trend on the slippages side? What are your targets on recovery this fiscal?

We have had slippages of Rs 3,952 crore in the second quarter, out of which around Rs 1,800 crore pertains to the NBFC which was recently in the news. If you exclude that, it is a tad above Rs 2,000 crore only. Our collection efficiency has been improving, and looking at the overall trend, we don’t have much worry about slippages. Recovery in the first half was to the tune of Rs 4,800 crore. In the remaining two quarters of FY 22, we are looking at recovering around Rs 4,000 crore. Put together, the recovery for FY22 should be around Rs 8,800 crore. We have Rs 22,000-crore exposure in NCLT and we expect good recovery from the tribunal.

What are your network expansion plans? Any capital raising in the offing?

The bank has rationalised around 250 branches as part of amalgamation of Allahabad Bank into itself. Currently, it has 5,759 domestic branches. We are planning to open about 100 branches in the current fiscal. Our capital adequacy ratio was at 15.88% in Q2 and we are adequately capitalised. In the current financial year, we don’t have any plans to raise capital. The government holding is around 80% and there is headroom for diluting the stake.

Bank has seen good traction in digital transactions. What are the plans on furthering it?

We have floated an RFP (request for proposal) with an objective of changing our operating models. We will be focusing on more digital transactions on both the liability and assets sides. The bank has seen 10% increase in digital transaction mainly due to mobile banking and UPI.

How many accounts will you be transferring to NARCL?

We have identified eight accounts to be transferred to the proposed bad bank, having exposure of close to Rs 1,900 crore. Indian Bank has invested Rs 20 crore in the bad bank.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Pre-bid meeting was scheduled to be held on October 22, 2021 at 03:00 PM. However, no bidder came to the meeting.

2. An e-mail dated October 21, 2021 was received from M/s Tech SIS Limited regarding the following queries related to the captioned tender. The Bank’s reply is as follows:

Sl. No. Queries raised Bank’s reply
1 Whether the service set up of OEM is mandatory or the service set up of the bidder authorised by the OEM is acceptable? (As it is not possible for the OEM to have its service set up at all locations). The service set up by the participating bidder authorised by the OEM is also acceptable.
2 Whether the terms of payment can be changed from 50% against delivery and 50% after completion of work to 60% against delivery and 40% after completion of work? Payment terms are as per the tender and no change is acceptable.
3 Whether the system should have a provision to integrate with CCTV and Building Management System? Integration with CCTV and Building Management System is not mandatory.
4 Whether unbreakable glass (IP65) with panic button is acceptable? IP65 specification is applicable for unbreakable glass.
5 Please confirm the specification of the cable. FR Copper armoured multistranded cable (4Cx1.5 sq mm) is required.
6 What would be the distance of last device and last keypad from the Main control panel? The vendors are required to visit the site to assess the position and distance themselves.
  1. The above Bank’s reply shall form part of the bid document/ Agreement.

  2. Rest of the terms & conditions and specifications of the bid document shall continue to remain same.

  3. The above amendments/ clarifications are issued for the information for all the intending bidders.

  4. The submission of bid by the firm shall be construed to be in conformity to the bid document and amendments/ clarifications given above.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Thiruvananthapuram had invited e-tender for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of X-Ray Baggage Scanner System at Reserve Bank of India, Thiruvananthapuram, through RBI Website and MSTC Portal on October 05, 2021.

2. In this context, it is notified that the schedule of events of the tender is modified as under.

Sl. No. Activity Existing Date Revised Date
1 Last date for submitting e-tender in MSTC Portal 14.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 14.00 Hrs 01-11-2021
2 Due date of submission of EMD 13.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 13.00 Hrs 01-11-2021
3 Date & time of opening of Part I of tender 15.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 15.00 Hrs 01-11-2021

Regional Director for Kerala and Lakshadweep

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2021-22/115
DoR.AUT.REC.62/23.67.001/2021-22

October 28, 2021

All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(excluding Regional Rural Banks)

Dear Sir/Madam

Gold Monetization Scheme (GMS), 2015

In exercise of the powers conferred on the Reserve Bank of India under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the RBI makes the following amendments in the Reserve Bank of India (Gold Monetization Scheme, 2015) Master Direction No.DBR.IBD.No.45/23.67.003/2015-16 dated October 22, 2015, with immediate effect.

2. A new sub-paragraph 2.2.2 (f) has been inserted to read as follows:

2.2.2 (f) Interest on premature closure of the deposit in case of death of depositor before and after lock-in period

The amount payable to the depositor shall be calculated as a sum of (A) and (B), as indicated below:

(A) Actual market value of the gold deposit on the day of withdrawal.

(B) Interest payable on the value of the gold for the period of deposit at the applicable rate.

(i) Before lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 6 months >6 months and ≥1 year and ≥2 years and
MTGD 3 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.25% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.00% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.75%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 1 year >1 year and ≥2 years and ≥3 years and
LTGD 5 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.00% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.75% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

(ii) After lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>3 years and ≥5 years and
MTGD 3 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>5 years and ≥ 7 years and ≥12 years and
LTGD 5 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125%

3. A new sub-paragraph 2.2.2 (g) has been inserted to read as follows:

2.2.2 (g) Interest on premature closure of the deposit due to default of loan taken against MLTGD before and after lock-in period

The amount payable to the depositor shall be calculated as a sum of (A) and (B), as indicated below:

(A) Actual market value of the gold deposit on the day of withdrawal.

(B) Interest payable on the value of the gold for the period of deposit at the applicable rate.

(i) Before lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 6 months >6 months and ≥1 year and ≥2 years and
MTGD 3 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.375% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.125% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.875%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 1 year >1 year and ≥2 years and ≥3 years and
LTGD 5 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.125% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.875% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375%

(ii) After lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>3 years and ≥5 years and
MTGD 3 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>5 years and ≥ 7 years and ≥12 years and
LTGD 5 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

4. The Reserve Bank of India Master Direction No.DBR.IBD.45/23.67.003/2015-16 dated October 22, 2015 on Gold Monetization Scheme, 2015 has been updated incorporating the above changes.

Yours faithfully

(Prakash Baliarsingh)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 149 150 151 152 153 16,278