Covid-related health insurance claims top ₹23,000 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reflecting the surge in cases, Covid-related health insurance claims have crossed ₹23,000 crore for non-life insurers.

However, the average duration of hospitalisation and claim amount has come down in the second wave of the pandemic as against the first wave last year.

Data with General Insurance Council (GIC) reveals that insurers had received 15.32 lakh Covid-related claims by May 20 amounting to ₹23,715 crore.

Of this, 12.59 crore claims worth ₹12,133 crore have been settled.

About 1.13 lakh patients who had filed claims were still under treatment, while 22,461 had died, the data revealed. The remaining 13.96 lakh have been discharged.

Speedy clearance

Insurers said the average claim size is now lower at about ₹95,000 against the earlier ₹1,15,000 for patients hospitalised for Covid-19. The duration of stay has also come down to about six days from the previous nine-day period.

“The average claim size has slightly come down mainly because the duration of hospitalisation has come down to about six days now from the earlier average of nine days. Treatment protocols are standardised now. Hospitals are also flooded with patients and so are sending them for home quarantine once they are not critical,” said Bhaskar Nerurkar, Head, Health Claims, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance.

Another insurer said that despite the huge number of cases, both hospitals and insurers are better prepared to deal with claims this year and said timely clearance of claims is the main focus at present.

“Since the order by the IRDAI, all efforts are on to ensure that Covid-related hospitalisation claims are cleared within one hour,” noted the insurer who did not wish to be named.

The GIC data further revealed that amongst States, Maharashtra had the largest number of Covid claims at 5.51 lakh, followed by Gujarat with 1.72 lakh and Karnataka with 1.28 lakh claims.

Meanwhile, 1.23 lakh claims have been filed from Tamil Nadu and over 85,000 claims have come from Delhi.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lenders likely to move NCLAT over DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) are looking at various options and are expected to file an appeal with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Monday.

The move comes after the National Company Law Tribunal asked DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days. In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore is being offered by Piramal Enterprises.

Also read: Allowing Wadhawan to present settlement offer could derail DHFL resolution process: RBI

The Reserve Bank of India in its affidavit to the NCLT had said that permitting Wadhawan to make an offer for DHFL could derail the company’s resolution process. Bankers too are not in favour of such a move and have been left worried by the NCLT decision.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI Stock: Motilal Oswal Places A “Buy”

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Sunil Fernandes

|

Motilal Oswal has a buy rating on the stock of State Bank of India with a target price of Rs 530 per share. The shares of State Bank of India were last seen trading at Rs 412 on the National Stock Exchange.

The brokerage firm believes that the earnings were set to gain pace and the asset quality was robust.

“State Bank of India 4QFY21 result has been nothing less than spectacular. The bank reported 4QFY21 slippages of just Rs 54.7 billion(a 20 quarter low; surprisingly comparable to other Private Banks), thus taking total slippages for FY21 to Rs 285 billion(1.2% of loans), while restructuring book stands controlled at 0.7% of loans,” the brokerage firm has noted.

SBI Stock: Motilal Oswal Places A “Buy”

Gross non performing assets at the bank GNPAs fell 15% in FY21 (43% decline over the past three years), while the coverage ratio has increased to 71% at present from 40% four years back.

“Its earnings in FY21 have been more than the sum of what it did in the last five years (FY16-20). Overall, the bank is making strong progress on earnings normalization (FY21 RoE of 9.3%). We expect it to deliver FY22E/FY23E RoE of 13.9%/15%. We maintain our BUY rating with a revised target price of Rs 530 per share(1.1x FY23E ABV+INR187/share from subsidiaries). State Bank of India continues to remain among our top Buys in the sector,” the brokerage firm has stated.

Several brokerages have also revised their target price on the stock including CLSA and HSBC.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bitcoin down 10% to $33,747, ether slips 14%, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bitcoin fell 13% on Sunday after the world’s biggest and best-known cryptocurrency suffered another sell-off that left it down nearly 50% from the year’s high.

Bitcoin fell to $32,601 at 1800 GMT (2 p.m. ET), losing $4,899.54 from its previous close. It hit a high for the year of $64,895.22 on April 14.

Ether, the coin linked to the ethereum blockchain network, dropped 17% to $1,905 on Sunday, losing $391.31 from its previous close.

Bitcoin markets operate 24/7, setting the stage for price swings at unpredictable hours.

“Many point to bitcoin’s volatility as untenable,” wrote RBC Capital Markets’ Amy Wu Silverman in a research note published on Saturday. “Indeed, Bitcoin makes severe and dizzying swings.”

Bitcoin had been under pressure after a series of tweets last week by billionaire Tesla Chief Executive and cryptocurrency backer Elon Musk, chiefly his reversal on Tesla accepting bitcoin as payment.

In addition, on Friday China cracked down on mining and trading of the largest cryptocurrency as part of ongoing efforts to prevent speculative and financial risks.

China’s Financial Stability and Development Committee, chaired by Vice Premier Liu He, singled out bitcoin as the asset it needs to regulate more.

The statement, which came days after three Chinese industry bodies tightened a ban on banks and payment companies providing crypto-related services, was a sharp escalation of the country’s push to stamp out speculation and fraud in virtual currencies.

China’s latest campaign against crypto came after the U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday called for new rules that would require large cryptocurrency transfers to be reported to the Internal Revenue Service, and the Federal Reserve flagged the risks cryptocurrencies posed to financial stability.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How PPF Account On Behalf Of A Minor Is Taxed?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Vipul Das

|

The Publlc Provident Fund (PPF), which is deemed among the most popular investment options for many investors, help with tax savings as well as long-term wealth creation. In fact, not only adults but even minors can open a PPF account. A minor’s PPF account can be opened for as little as Rs. 500. However, regardless of the number of accounts, the maximum amount that can be deposited in a family’s PPF accounts in a financial year is Rs. 1.5 lakh. The account must be managed by the guardian before the minor reaches the age of 18. To be eligible to open a PPF account for a minor, the below conditions must be satisfied:

Eligibility required to open a PPF account on behalf of a minor

Eligibility required to open a PPF account on behalf of a minor

  • An individual can open one account for each minor or person of unsound mind over whom he or she has guardianship.
  • A legal guardian should be the person who manages the account on behalf of the minor.
  • However, each guardian can only open one account in the name of a minor or a person of unsound mind.
  • After the death of the parents, the grandparents of a minor child can only manage a PPF account if they are legitimate guardians of the minor.
  • A nominee can also be declared while opening a PPF account on behalf of a minor.
  • In a fiscal year, an individual can contribute a minimum of Rs. 500 and a maximum of Rs. 1.5 lakh to the minor’s PPF account.

Documents required to open a PPF account on behalf of a minor

Documents required to open a PPF account on behalf of a minor

At a post office or a specified bank branch, one can open a PPF account on behalf of a minor. To open an account, the individual will be required to submit the below listed documents:

  • The required details of the guardian and minor should be filled out on the account opening form.
  • The guardian’s KYC documents, as well as a photograph, must be attached to the application form and submitted at the concerned bank or post office.
  • Aadhaar card or birth certificate of the minor child as a proof of age must also be submitted.
  • Initial contribution to the PPF account.

Points to keep in mind while opening a PPF account on behalf of a minor

Points to keep in mind while opening a PPF account on behalf of a minor

While opening a PPF account on behalf of a minor, keep the following facts in consideration.

  • A minor’s PPF account can only be managed on his or her behalf by a parent or guardian until the account holder reaches the age of 18.
  • In case the contribution put into the minor’s PPF account comes from the parent’s or guardian’s income, it will be counted in Section 80C of the Income Tax Act and qualify for tax deductions.
  • A minor’s PPF account can be closed by a parent or guardian prematurely for the account holder’s higher education or treatment of life-threatening disease.
  • An individual can make partial withdrawals from a minor’s PPF account starting in the seventh year when the account was opened.
  • Except under exceptional circumstances, such as the account holder’s medical attention, a parent or guardian can close a minor’s PPF account. He or she can only raise a request for the account to be closed after five years have passed since the account was opened.
  • In the case of an account opened on behalf of a minor or a person of unsound mind, the guardian can apply for a loan on the minor’s or person’s behalf.
  • At the request of the guardian, an account opened on behalf of a minor or a person of unsound mind can be extended.

Taxation rules

Taxation rules

A depositor or account holder can contribute a maximum of Rs 1.50 lakh to his or her PPF account, as well as the minor’s PPF account. There is also a cap of Rs. 1.50 lakh that can be deposited in a single PPF account. As a result, your contribution to the PPF account of your one minor child, made jointly by you and your wife, should not surpass Rs 1.50 lakh. If you want to seek the tax benefit under Section 80C, the cap of Rs. 1.50 lakh relates to contributions made to your minor child’s PPF account.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015





Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.





With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Investors lost a whopping $830 billion in crypto crash last week, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Last week was very volatile for cryptocurrencies with Bitcoins plunging to $30,000 level before recovering slightly. In the process, it lost nearly half of its total value, bankrupting many of those who invested in it.

Other coins also followed suit, crashing as much as 63 per cent in the last seven days. In essence, crypto investors lost a whopping $830 billion in the blowout last week. The total market cap of all cryptocurrencies stands at $1.49 trillion as of now.

Many exchanges across the world faced problems due to heightened volumes and sell orders. These included Binance, WazirX (owned by Binance), Voyager and Coinbase, among others.

There were two major reasons behind the crash. The first was the vehicle maker Tesla’s sudden decision to stop car purchases using Bitcoins, a measure they announced a couple of months back.

The company cited environmental concerns over the computational ‘mining’ process behind its move. Mining basically refers to the process in which computers solve complex mathematical puzzles to enable transactions using Bitcoins and in return generate more Bitcoins. This is a high energy intensive process, requiring electricity often produced by burning coal.

Bitcoin enthusiasts had hoped for its wider adoption as a currency after Tesla’s decision in March. But, the recent U-turn dashed those hopes. Besides, Tesla has also trimmed its Bitcoin investments, as per its latest quarterly report.

Another reason behind the sell-off has been China’s crackdown on mining rigs across the country. China reiterated a warning last week that it intends to crack down on cryptocurrency mining as part of an effort to control financial risks.

According to some estimates, China is home to the largest concentration of world’s crypto miners. This results in high electricity consumption for a country which has been dealing with severe pollution.

Earlier in the week, Chinese authorities warned that financial institutions weren’t allowed to accept it for payment, curtailing hopes further.

Musk effect

Many investors and analysts have also blamed mercurial technocrat Elon Musk for the massive volatility in crypto assets. His tweets, sometimes in support and other times criticising the assets, are seen to have an immediate bearing on price movements.

Musk has been a fervent supporter of Bitcoin and Dogecoin (which actually started as an internet meme and has no fundamental basis like Bitcoin), but have also termed the mania around cryptocurrencies a “hustle”.

Many of Musk’s followers last week blamed him for their losses. In fact, some Twitter users claimed they became homeless after Dogecoin prices crashed following Musk’s advice.

As per the latest data, Bitcoin traded at $35,665, down 27 per cent in the last seven days. Ethereum was at $2,124 (down 45 per cent), Cardano $1.35 (down 43 per cent), Binance Coin at $269 (down 55 per cent), Dogecoin at $0.32 (down 40 per cent) and XRP at $0.84 (down 46 per cent).

Prices have recovered slightly in the last 24 hours but no one can comment on how they will behave next week. Volatility has been a characteristic property of the crypto assets and it will likely move in a wide range in the future as well, many commentators believe.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IBA reaches out to govt for refund of compound interest waiver by banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Indian Banks‘ Association (IBA) on behalf of lenders has approached the finance ministry to refund the burden fallen on their shoulders due to a recent Supreme Court judgment on the waiver of compound interest on all loan accounts which opted for moratorium during March-August 2020.

The March judgment of the apex court directed the banks to waive off compound interest on loans above Rs 2 crore availing moratorium as loans below this got blanket interest on interest waiver in November last year.

Compound interest support scheme for loan moratorium cost the government Rs 5,500 crore during 2020-21, and the scheme covered all borrowers including the prompt one who did not avail moratorium.

Various banks are at the different stages of executing the order.

Punjab & Sind Bank Managing Director S Krishnan said the burden on the bank due to waiver works out to be around Rs 30 crore.

The issue of reimbursement of the waiver amount by the government is being pursued by IBA on behalf of the banks, he said.

Asked if the finance ministry has responded to their request, he said, “So far, we have not heard anything positive on this.”

The apex court order this time is only limited to those who availed moratorium. So, the liability of the public sector bank should be less than Rs 2,000 crore as per rough calculations, sources had said.

The RBI on March 27 last year announced a loan moratorium on payment of instalments of term loans falling due between March 1 and May 31, 2020, due to the pandemic, later the same was extended to August 31.

The Supreme Court on March 23, 2021, directed that no compound or penal interest shall be charged from borrowers for the six-month loan moratorium period, which was announced last year amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and the amount already charged shall be refunded, credited or adjusted.

The apex court refused to interfere with the Centre and the Reserve Bank of India‘s (RBI) decision to not extend the loan moratorium beyond August 31 last year, saying it is a policy decision.

Rejecting pleas for a complete waiver on interest the court opined that such a move would have consequences on the economy. The bench also said that interest waiver would affect depositors. Along with this, the court also rejected pleas for further relief in the matter.

Soon after the order, the RBI asked banks and NBFCs to immediately put in place a board-approved policy to refund/ adjust the “interest on interest” charged to the borrowers during the six-month moratorium, in conformity with the Supreme Court judgment.

The central bank also asked lending institutions to disclose the aggregate amount to be refunded/ adjusted in respect of their borrowers based on the reliefs in their financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CII wants RBI to review circular on appointment of bank, NBFC auditors, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Industry chamber CII has asked the Reserve Bank to review its circular on appointment of auditors for banks and NBFCs saying it was inconsistent with the provisions of the Companies Act and would create hardship for businesses in times COVID.

The Reserve Bank in its circular on April 27, 2021 imposed various restrictions on appointment of auditors by banks and NBFCs and prescribed a cooling off period for re-appointment.

Urging the RBI to review the circular, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) said the proposals “will cause significant hardship to the companies, its stakeholders as well as industry in general”.

The chamber said that few matters that warrant an immediate attention of the RBI include a clarification that the circular is only intended to cover banks and NBFCs and their respective audit firms.

“The RBI may not apply the same principles to the commercial banks and NBFCs, including in respect of cap on maximum number of audits, mandatory joint audits, and rotation/cool off principles. The NBFCs may continue to be governed by the Companies Act, 2013,” it said.

It also suggested to re-consider severe restrictions on capacity and eligibility requirements, limit on number of audits, maximum engagement period of 3 years and 6 years cool off period after rotation.

“The RBI may consider aligning them with the provisions in the Companies Act, 2013. The RBI may still achieve its objectives, without diluting any of the principles,” it said.

The chamber further asked for review of definition of related parties, which as per the circular include the group entities using a common brand name as this has far reaching implications and unintended consequences; and restrictions on audit/non-audit services during one year before/after the appointment as auditors of a bank/NBFC, covering the entity and its group entities.

“These provisions may create severe capacity constraints, without adding any qualitative parameters,” CII said, requesting the RBI to help in facilitating an effective implementation of regulation, without disrupting the ease of doing business.

It also said that a sudden change in major policies, without any reasonable transitional provisions, is bound to create several practical challenges in successful implementation.

“It should also be noted that appointment of auditors is a critical and important process for an organisation and merits right level of attention especially from senior management, board and audit committee, and approval from RBI,” CII said.

It added that all these amendments will create inconsistent policies without adding any qualitative parameters.

“It is all the more challenging in present times, severely impacted by COVID-19, to implement these requirements without any transitional provisions,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

These Two Deadlines Have Not Changed; Taxpayers Be Mindful

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Taxes

oi-Roshni Agarwal

|

In a bid to offer relief to taxpayers amid the raging second coronavirus wave in the country, the income tax filing deadline has been extended to September 30, 2021 for FY21. But here in note that these two deadlines have not been changed:

These Two Deadlines Have Not Changed; Taxpayers Be Mindful

These Two Deadlines Have Not Changed; Taxpayers Be Mindful

1. Submit form 15G/15H for investment in FD by June 30:

FD investors who do not have taxable income in order to get rid of their liability from the interest pay out on FDs need to submit 15G or 15 H forms with their bank so as to show that their threshold taxable income limit is lower. Now, these forms have to be submitted by June 30.

Regular citizens need to submit form 15G and for citizens the form is form 15G.
Earlier the threshold for TDS deduction was at Rs. 10000 but now this has been increased to Rs. 40000. Now if you wish to avoid TDS deduction on your FD income which is deducted at source by the bank and your income is below taxable limit, you need to submit the forms before the deadline of June 30, 2021.

2. Payment of Self-assessment tax also becomes due:

The payment of self-assessment tax for the financial year 2020-21 is due on July 31 for all those tax payers whose tax after deducting advance tax or TDS is more than Rs. 1 lakh. Now if such taxpayers do not adhere to the deadline there shall be levied a penalty on them. As per 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the penal interest rate at the rate of 1 percent from August 1, 2021 till the ITR filing date shall then be applicable.

GoodReturns.in



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 27 28 29 30 31 100