Choosing the right annuity plan for post-retirement life

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


We spend about 30 years plus of our life working to make a living. With increase in life spans, planning for retirement has become even more important. Most of us will enjoy two decades plus of retired life. Thus, retirement planning is essential for everyone irrespective of their income or lifestyle.

Annuity plans are an important part of retirement planning. In simple words, an annuity plan provides a regular and guaranteed income, or ‘salary’ in the retirement years. Annuity is treated as income for tax purposes and is taxed as such. The annuity paid is dependent on the lump sum investment that you make to the insurance company when buying the plan. Insurers invest this money into various financial instruments and the returns generated are used to pay the annuity. An annuity is usually purchased by people above the age of 55.

Here are a few key factors that you should consider when purchasing one.

Identify the amount you want every month

The first step is to identify how much lump sum investment you can make or how much pay-out you need. An easy-to-use calculator on insurers’ website will allow you to determine the lump sum amount based on the pay-out you wish to receive, or vice versa. Insurers also allow you to choose the periodicity – ranging from monthly, quarterly, half-yearly to yearly.

Choose the right category

There are primarily two types of annuity products. One is the ‘Immediate Annuity Plan’, wherein the pay-outs begin as soon as the lump sum amount is invested. This is suitable for a person buying the plan very close to retirement. The second is ‘Deferred Annuity’, wherein the pay-outs begin after a certain date. This option is suitable for a person who is buying a policy before retirement age and would need the pay-out only after a few years.

Find the right plan

You need to choose between Policy with Return of Purchase Price (ROP) or Policy Without ROP. For the former, the principal amount invested is returned to the legal heirs on death of the policyholder. This allows you to leave a lump sum amount for your nominee on your demise. For policy without ROP, the principal amount invested is not passed on to legal heirs, but the annuity amount paid each month is much higher as compared to first option. This is a good option to pass on the risk of living too long to the insurer. For an investment of ₹10 lakh today, a 60-year-old person in policy with ROP will get around ₹4,500 per month. For the same investment in a policy without ROP, he / she will get around ₹6,000 per month.

Expand coverage to include life of spouse

One also needs to choose prudently on whether the annuity is for a single life or joint life. In a case of single life policy, the annuity is paid till the death of the policyholder. But in case of a joint life policy, the annuity is paid till the death of last survivor among self and spouse. The annuity payout for joint life is lower than for single life. Hence you need to weigh your option judiciously.

To sum up, annuity provides steady income throughout your life. In the end, choose a plan that will help you play your second innings even better than the first.

The writer is President-Business Strategy, SBI Life Insurance

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

“BUY” This Small Cap Industrial Stock For ~109% Upside: Monarch Networth(MNCL)

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The brokerage’s take on IFGL Refractories

According to the brokerage’s research report “IFGL is expected to deliver strong earnings growth with Consolidated EBITDA to double to Rs1.9-2bn (in FY23E/FY24E) vs Rs0.9-1bn range for last 3-4 years. This is led by the addition of customers especially mini-mills (10-11% of the revenue now as compared to no presence before), recruitment of industry veterans from peers at key positions, market share gains in domestic refractory business and favourable demand scenario from both domestic and global steel industry. We expect an improved performance by IFGL’s overseas subsidiaries on recovery in demand in EU and USA along with higher acceptability of products sold by Hoffman. Additionally, location benefits of the new plant in south and product additions (precast at Vizag) should help IFGL achieve revenue growth of at least 12% CAGR over FY21-FY24E.”

The brokerage has also said that “IFGL has maintained Net cash for the last 3 years, thereby financing expansions through internal accruals as also ensuring higher returns to shareholders (FY21 dividend yield 5.8%). IFGL’s cash flow generation is also very efficient due to the tight working capital cycle leading to OCF/Cash PAT > 1 for the last 5years. Despite such compelling financials, IFGL currently trades at 4.1x FY23E EV/EBITDA vs 14-17x for peers. We believe that the stock certainly qualifies for a re-rating.”

Buy IFGL Refractories with a target price of Rs. 585

Buy IFGL Refractories with a target price of Rs. 585

The brokerage has claimed in its research report that “We initiate on IFGL Refractories Ltd. (IFGL), a highly undervalued business in the booming refractory sector, with a TP of Rs585 (~109% upside) and BUY. We value the overseas subsidiary business at 4.2x Sept’23E EV/EBITDA, which is a 40% discount to its global peers and domestic business at 10.2x Sept’23E EV/EBITDA which is a 40% discount to leading domestic peer to arrive at the fair value of Rs585/share. At a CMP of Rs292, the stock trades at 3.9x FY23E EV/EBITDA. Key risks: RM cost risk impacted by sea freight inflation, change in management.”

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

The stock has been picked from the brokerage report of Monarch Networth Capital Limited (MNCL). Investing in equities poses a risk of financial losses. Investors must therefore exercise due caution. Greynium Information Technologies, the author, and the brokerage house are not liable for any losses caused as a result of decisions based on the article.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

After India, US regulators to mull over crypto risks in 2022, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


San Francisco/New Delhi, The banking regulators in the US have announced a plan to clarify the rules and regulations around how banks can use cryptocurrencies over the next year, at a time when governments the world over, including India, are weighing the risks associated with cryptocurrencies and safeguard investors.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said in a statement that they recognise that the emerging crypto-asset sector presents potential opportunities and risks for banking organisations, their customers and the overall financial system.

“As supervised institutions seek to engage in crypto-asset-related activities, it is important that the agencies provide coordinated and timely clarity where appropriate to promote safety and soundness, consumer protection, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including anti-money laundering and illicit finance statutes and rules,” the regulators said in a joint statement on Wednesday.

Throughout 2022, the US agencies plan to provide greater clarity on whether certain activities related to crypto-assets conducted by banking organisations are legally permissible, and expectations for safety and soundness, consumer protection, and compliance with existing laws and regulations.

The agencies said that they continue to monitor developments in crypto-assets and may address other issues as the market evolves.

Further, the agencies will continue to engage and collaborate with other relevant authorities, as appropriate, on issues arising from activities involving crypto-assets.

In India, the upcoming Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India.

It, however, allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of cryptocurrency and its usage.

With the Indian government seeking to ban all private cryptocurrencies in the Crypto Bill 2021, experts and leading industry players have said that provisions relating to “banning” private cryptocurrencies would have to be looked at very carefully.

Several high-profile meetings have been held to discuss the regulation of cryptocurrencies in recent days. The Parliamentary Standing Committee had also called for the regulation on cryptocurrencies and its ecosystem.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had earlier said that all democratic countries need to work together on cryptocurrency and ensure that it does not end up in the wrong hands.

Giving an example of the virtual currency, he had said: “Take cryptocurrency or Bitcoin for example. It is important that all nations work together on this and ensure it does not end up in the wrong hands, which can spoil our youth.”

–IANS

na/dpb



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India to consider allowing crypto trading for some investors, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India is considering a proposal to treat cryptocurrencies as a financial asset while safeguarding small investors, according to people familiar with the matter.

The discussions come as authorities race to finalize a bill Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government wants to present to parliament in the session starting Nov. 29. The legislation may stipulate a minimum amount for investments in digital currencies, while banning their use as legal tender, the people said, asking not to be identified as no final decision has been taken.

Policy makers left themselves some wiggle room when they posted a description of the bill on parliament’s website late Tuesday, by saying the bill seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies except “certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of cryptocurrency and its uses.”

The uncertainty triggered a sell-off on Wednesday in cryptocurrencies including Shiba Inu and Dogecoin, which were at one point down more than 20 per cent in trading on the WazirX platform, one of India’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges. They were far less affected on trading platforms such as Binance or Kraken.

A spokesman for the finance ministry couldn’t be immediately reached for a comment.

The Reserve Bank of India wants a complete ban on digital currencies as the central bank feels it could affect the nation’s macroeconomic and financial stability. While the government is considering taxing gains from cryptocurrency in the next budget, Governor Shaktikanta Das last week said the country needs much deeper discussions on the issue.

The Prime Minister’s Office is actively looking at the issue, and once the contents of the bill are finalized it would be taken to the Cabinet for its approval, the people said.

Earlier this month, Modi held a meeting on cryptocurrencies, after which officials said India wont let unregulated crypto markets become avenues for money laundering and terror financing. Later, in a speech last week, he urged democratic nations to cooperate in regulating private virtual currencies failing which they could land up in the “wrong hands”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Cryptocurrency: Indian Govt Should Create Framework For Exchanges And Investors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Personal Finance

oi-Sunil Fernandes

By Hitesh Malviya

|

The USA has one of the best policies in place for usage, and trading or cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency exchanges are regulated in the same way as conventional AML/CFT facilitators, financial firms, and capital transmitters in the United States, and are subject to the same rules, including those outlined in the Bank Secrecy Act amendments of 2021.

There are a lot of uncertainties around because we see different reports almost everyday. It’s an environment of FUD, we need to wait and watch when the cryptocurrency regulation bill goes on the table in the upcoming winter session.

The Indian government should create a regulatory framework for both exchanges, and investors who are dealing in cryptocurrency-based trading, and services. A well-defined regulation will also accelerate the growth of the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem in India, more foreign investment will get attracted after such implementation of policies. For investors, the government should work on creating awareness about the usage, and risk of cryptocurrency by leveraging media and communication. Government should also be working towards investor protection by creating cybercrime laws, and resources to deal with cryptocurrency-based scams.

The Blanket ban on cryptocurrencies would be the worst-case scenario, I doubt it won’t happen. But if it happens then the one possible reason could be the launch of CBDC. China implemented a blanket ban on cryptocurrency trading and mining to create a safe passage for the adoption of their CDBC. India may follow the same route. Chances are low though.

Nothing will happen to the cryptocurrency market, because it’s a global market, and investors would have plenty of options available to move their crypto assets and trade on decentralized and international exchanges. It’s hard to stop the crypto movement now, no government can stop it. It will grow more even if a ban comes into place.

Cryptocurrency: Indian Govt Should Create Framework For Exchanges And Investors

(Hitesh Malviya, the author of the article is founder of itsblockchain.com, India’s First & Oldest Blockchain Cryptocurrency Publication. The comments are that of the author and do not reflect the opinion of Greynium Information Technologies Pvt Ltd).

Story first published: Friday, November 26, 2021, 8:30 [IST]



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banning cryptocurrencies could lead to more unlawful usage, says BACC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A blanket ban on cryptocurrencies will encourage usage by non-state players, which will further increase unlawful usage, said Blockchain and Crypto Assets Council (BACC), part of the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), in a statement on Thursday.

This statement comes days after the government listed the Cryptocurrency Bill in the Parliament for introduction. The Bill urges ban on all private cryptocurrencies, with some exceptions.

There would be several negative outcomes of a ban such as zero accountability and traceability of the origin and end usage of the cryptocurrencies; besides a complete evasion of taxes, IAMAI said.

A ban will also adversely impact retail investors, it added.

BACC has always been in favour of prohibiting the usage of private cryptocurrencies as a currency in India by law since usage as currency is likely to interfere with monetary policy and fiscal controls, it said. However, BACC has also advocated their use only as an asset.

The Council believes that ‘smartly regulated crypto assets business’ will protect investors, help monitor Indian buyers and sellers, lead to better taxation of the industry, and limit illegal usage of cryptos.

The Blockchain and Crypto Assets Council (BACC) represents crypto exchanges based in India and includes companies like CoinDCX, WazirX, and Coinswitch Kuber.

The Council believes that the efforts of the exchanges should be supported by law, which should enable them to provide safer services to investors and fair taxes to the government.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DBS says banking services back to normal after two-day outage, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SINGAPORE, – Singapore’s DBS Group said its online banking services had been fully restored after suffering disruptions for about two days in its biggest outage since 2010, prompting the central bank to consider taking supervisory action.

In a Facebook post late on Thursday, Southeast Asia’s biggest lender said customer logins and transaction activities have returned to normal pre-disruption levels since Thursday morning.

The bank’s services, including its payment app, were disrupted on Tuesday and Wednesday DBS said its systems remain secure and were not a target of a cyber-attack.

“We will continue to monitor and review the events of this week and are taking steps to prevent future recurrences,” the bank said.

The disruption drew the ire of thousands of customers just hours after the bank, Singapore’s largest, announced a fix after the first day of the outage on Tuesday. (Reporting by Anshuman Daga; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Union Bank of India extends chief risk officer’s tenure by 3 months, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Union Bank of India on Thursday said it has extended the tenure of its chief risk officer B S Venkatesha by three months from mid December. The decision was taken in a meeting of the board of directors, it said.

“The board of directors, at its meeting held on November 25, 2021, approved the extension of tenure of B S Venkatesha, General Manager and Chief Risk Officer of the bank for a further period of three months with effect from December 18, 2021,” Union Bank of India said in a regulatory filing.

Stock of the bank closed at Rs 45.80 apiece on BSE, down 1.29 per cent over previous close.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank partners Amazon Pay for UPI, chooses AWS for payment processing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Yes Bank has partnered with Amazon Pay and AWS to offer UPI payment to users. In FY21, Yes Bank recorded a market share of around 40% by volume in the UPI ecosystem and around 30% by volume in the UPI merchant acquiring business thanks to the integration with PhonePe.

The integration with Amazon Pay will enable the US e-commerce giant, which is a late entrant into the payment space, to issue UPI IDs with the @yapl handle. The tie-up will further expand Yes Bank’s presence in UPI with its payment processing platform hosted on AWS.

Based on a multi-bank model, this collaboration allows Yes Bank to acquire merchants through the Amazon Pay platform, adding to its existing merchant network.

The private lender said it has developed a cloud-native UPI processing platform to optimally handle the high traffic of transactions observed during surge periods like festivals or annual sales.

“With this collaboration, we will be able to offer our customers more control, flexibility and choice for a vast range of purchases and peer-to-peer transactions — through UPI-based payments,” said Prashant Kumar, MD & CEO, Yes Bank.

According to Mahendra Nerurkar, CEO and VP, Amazon Pay, the company plans to expand its digital payment network by making it more rewarding for customers. “UPI is one of the most convenient and popular ways to pay in India. With a cloud-native architecture we hope to keep raising the bar on availability, speed and customer experience using UPI through the Amazon app,” said Nerurkar.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Public’s money in PMC, had impact on economy’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The special PMLA court recently said no evidence was required to hold that Punjab and Maharashtra Co-op Bank’s (PMC) money was of the public and that it had a direct impact on the nation’s economy.

“There is abundant material to hold that the applicant and his father connived with Waryam Singh (former chairman of PMC), raised huge loans in utter disregard to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) norms. In this way, proceeds of crime is generated, same was layered through bogus companies and ultimately offence of money laundering was committed by applicant (Sarang Wadhwan) and his father, HDIL promoter, Rakesh,” the court said.

Rakesh is also in jail in the case.

Sarang (48) was arrested in October 2019. His earlier attempts for bail were rejected by the court.

“There is absolutely no exceptional strong prima facie case nor change in circumstance for granting bail in this economic offence, wherein huge public money Rs 6117.93 crore had been laundered,” the court reasoned.

Special public prosecutor for Enforcement Directorate, Kavita Patil, had opposed Wadhawan’s plea for bail. In a 26-page order, the court said the defence arguments that since two years, the father and son are in jail without a trial, can neither be capitalized nor can be a grounds for granting bail. The court said restrictions due to Covid-19 were inevitable and no one could be blamed.

It said it was crystal clear that since the rejection of the first bail order in July 2020 until filing of the present plea, time was consumed in dealing with additional bail and other applications. “At the cost of repetition it has to be noted that it is the applicant (Sarang Wadhawan) and his father who are responsible for the same,” the court said.

It held that granting bail in economic offences of this nature would be against the larger interest of public.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 39 40 41 42 43 16,281