Cryptocurrencies tumble as coronavirus variant shakes markets, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Tom Wilson

LONDON -Bitcoin tumbled over 9% on Friday, dragging smaller tokens down, after the discovery of a new, potentially vaccine-resistant coronavirus variant saw investors dump riskier assets for the perceived safety of bonds, the yen and the dollar.

Bitcoin, the largest digital currency, fell as much as 9.2% to $53,551, its lowest since Oct. 10. The second largest cryptocurrency ether fell over 13% to its lowest in a month as investors ditched cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin, whose 13-year life has been peppered by bouts of extreme volatility, was on track for its biggest one-day drop since Sept. 20. It has slumped by more than a fifth since hitting a record high of almost $70,000 earlier this month.

Scientists said the coronavirus variant, detected in South Africa, Botswana and Hong Kong, has an unusual combination of mutations and may be able to evade immune responses or make it more transmissible.

“The spread of (the variant), especially to other countries, could wither investor appetite further,” said Yuya Hasegawa at Tokyo-based exchange Bitbank. “BTC’s upside will likely be limited and the market should brace for further loss.”

Bitcoin hit an all-time high of $69,000 earlier this month as more large investors embraced cryptocurrencies, with many drawn to its purported inflation-resistant qualities.

Others have piled into the digital token on the promise of quick gains, a draw that has been heightened by record low or negative interest rates. Yet bitcoin’s volatility has lingered, drawing questions over its suitability as a stable store of value.

Ether was last at $3,924. It is down almost 20% from its record high hit on Nov. 10.

(Reporting by Tom Wilson; editing by Carolyn Cohn, Kim Coghill, William Maclean)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Regulating cryptocurrency will make it another PayTM, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There is much debate and speculation around the upcoming Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 that is one of the 26 new bills on the agenda of the Union government for the upcoming winter session of the Parliament that begins from November 29. Media reports say that the legislation will try to define cryptocurrency and any information like number, code, token that promises a price will be considered cryptocurrency. As per the reports, the Central government is also considering a ban on all private cryptocurrencies in the proposed bill. ETCISO spoke to a range of stakeholders, including the security agencies and cybersecurity leaders about the Crypto Regulatory Framework, the pros, cons, opportunities and risks.

“I feel a regulatory framework is a must, including the KYC of each investor, properly licensed exchanges that follow transparency, and a database of all credit and debit activities of crypto, otherwise this entire crypto currency world will be hacked and it will evaporate. This is a big grey area operation that provides anonymity and which is leading to the misuse of this beautiful product and technology. For the police, it is a big headache. Whom do we go to in case some heist occurs? There are currently fake exchanges, fake mining , fake wallets, etc. How to we authenticate and enforce?” says Professor Triveni Singh, SP, Cybercrime, Uttar Pradesh Police.

“The biggest issue with crypto is its misuse by criminals, nation-states and speculators. Any digital currency must be designed to be traceable, and remove risks from paper currency while replacing it. One physical rupee should be the same as one crypto rupee. If crypto currency is controlled, a major portion of the incentive to hack companies would go. Today, my guess is that criminals invest a lot of money in vulnerability and exploit research and may be more adept than even security firms,” says Lucius Lobo, Chief Information Security Officer at Tech Mahindra.

“Addition of a regulatory framework and tying it back to the financial transactions lifecycle to check for terror financing or illegal transactions should also be one of the vectors to bring in governance for crypto. And a common framework on minimum security controls and assurance framework for organizations in setting up such environment, complimented with required education and awareness for end users of the system on how to secure their crypto assets and credentials would be helpful,” adds Dilip Panjwani, Senior Director – Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) & IT Controller at Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.

Money laundering using fiat money far exceeds misuse via crypto

There is a counterview to the opinion that cryptocurrencies have aided money laundering.

“I will disagree with this. Money Laundering using fiat money far far far exceeds misuse via crypto. But agree that KYC will help. But database of all transactions is already online and public on the blockchain,” counters a senior infosec leader.

Moreover, there are voices against such regulation as well.

“If we break its anonymity and control international transfers, as recommended by the RBI governor, It’ll just become another Paytm wallet. Here’s the problem. There’s no point of a distributed/ decentralised cryptosystem being controlled by one entity, for example, the RBI.

The entire reason for its immense popularity is “no control by any central authority” via it’s technical construct,” says another top cybersecurity expert on condition of anonymity.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EXIM Bank lines up $100 million credit for Covid vaccine cos, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Hyderabad: The Export-Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) has committed a credit line of $100 million for domestic manufacturers of Covid-19 vaccines as well as supporting players, including manufacturers of raw materials, said N Ramesh, deputy managing director, Exim Bank, here on Friday.

“These loans are expected to be sanctioned by the end of this financial year to seven companies, of which two are from Hyderabad,” he said, adding that the credit line is expected to be used to boost manufacturing capabilities as well as for exports.

Two Hyderabad-based players — Bharat Biotech and Biological E Ltd — are involved in the development of Covid-19 vaccines. While Bharat Biotech has developed Covaxin, Bio E has developed Corbevax that is currently undergoing Phase-3 trials.

He pointed out the country is on track to achieve its exports target of $400 billion of merchandise goods this fiscal year and the pharma sector is expected to be a major contributor.

Meanwhile, he said the bank is targeting financing of $7 billion of project exports over the next five years through the funds received from the central government in the National Export Insurance Account (NEIA).

“The opportunity for Indian exporters remains significant given the fact that the project exporters have already developed substantial competitiveness in several sectors and the financing options provided by Exim Bank are well recognised,” he said.

Exim Bank had organized an interactive session with infra players in Hyderabad on Friday to discuss the opportunities and challenges in this area and over 50 companies from the region had participated.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Metro branches bring life back in bank credit growth, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The rise in credit growth during the current financial year has been led by gradual revival of lending by bank branches in metropolitan centres, while private sector banks raised their market share further, Reserve Bank of India said Friday.

Credit-deposit ratio for metropolitan branches stood at 82.8 per cent in September against 88.4 per cent a year ago, reflecting the fact that deposit mobilisation outpaced lening growth. All-India credit-deposit ratio dipped to 70 per cent from 72 per cent over the same period.

Banks’ deposit growth, however, moderated a bit to 10.1 per cent in September from 11 per cent a year ago. The share of current account and savings account (CASA) deposits in total deposits has been gradually rising and it stood at 44.3 per cent in September 2021.

Private sector banks recorded 10.9 per cent and 16 per cent year-on-year growth in credit and deposit respectively in September. Correspondingly, growth in public sector banks stood much lower at 3.7 per cent and 7.4 per cent, respectively.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Corporate exclusion from banking shrinks buyer pool for PSBs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India’s decision to keep corporates away from bank licences will help the government sidestep allegations that it is selling banks to big business. However, the number of prospective buyers for public sector banks (PSBs) will shrink.

In the absence of any deep-pocketed corporate house, the bidders for PSU banks would have to be either private or multinational banks, or private equity investors who would be in a position to come up with a couple of billion dollars to buy a bank. The challenge in the case of private equity investors is that they would look for an exit after a few years, while multinational banks are increasingly reducing their retail exposure as retail banking is becoming a domestic activity because of compliance costs.

Private players like HDFC Bank, Kotak, ICICI and Axis have the equity-raising capacity, but the pension liabilities would be a deterrent. In March this year, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had said that the salary and pension of bank employees will be protected in the case of privatisation. “The deal-breaker would be the pension liabilities of these banks,” said a private banker. The fact that the pension is inflation-linked makes it worse for any buyer.

The source added that this is the reason why the banks are trading at low valuations despite having cleaned up their loan books.

For private banks, a bank licence or a branch network does have the same appeal that it would have for a corporate house. More so given the disruption that digital is causing. “Unlike in the past when a domestic bank licence would draw a lot of interest, there was only one serious bidder for Lakshmi Vilas BankDBS. When the RBI was looking for someone to take over PMC Bank, despite the lure of a licence of a Mumbai-headquartered bank, there was again only one bidder,” pointed out a banker.

While the PSBs are in better financial shape, a buyer would need to put in more capital and probably see a hike in the cost of funds as the government ownership, which provides a cushion to depositors, will no longer be there. Since liberalisation, the central bank has taken the safe route of issuing bank licences to financial institutions. The first round of banks that got their licence was largely sponsored by financial institutions, including HDFC, ICICI, UTI, IDBI and some non-banking finance companies such as Centurion, Kotak Mahindra and Bandhan. The experience in granting licences to professionals has not been good (Global Trust Bank and Yes Bank). The absence of private non-bank financial institutions makes the divestment more challenging.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Former RBI executive director Lily Vadera joins HDFC Bank board, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Nov 26 (PTI) HDFC Bank on Friday said its board has approved the appointment of former RBI executive director Lily Vadera as independent director. The board of directors of the bank approved the appointment of Lily Vadera as an additional independent director of the bank for a period of five years effective from November 26, 2021, subject to the approval of the shareholders, HDFC Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Vadera, 61, has 33 years of experience in central banking. She retired as Executive Director from the Reserve Bank of India in October 2020.

As an ED of the RBI, she was in-charge of the Department of Regulation (DoR) where she dealt with the regulatory framework for various entities in the financial sector, covering all categories of banks and non-banking finance companies.

She was instrumental in putting in place a framework for a regulatory Sandbox to provide an enabling environment for fintech players to foster innovation in financial services and played a significant role in the amalgamation of banks in stress, the bank said.

She also represented RBI and played an important role as a member of the Insolvency Law Committee set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. PTI KPM MR MR



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI accepts 21 recommendations on ownership of private banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, The Reserve Bank of India has accepted 21 out of the 33 recommendations submitted by an internal working group on the ownership and corporate structure of India’s private sector banks.

The internal group was constituted by the central bank on June 12, 2020 to review the extant guidelines on ownership and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks.

“After examining the comments and suggestions received from the stakeholders and members of the public, it has been decided to accept 21 recommendations (some with partial modifications, where considered necessary). The remaining recommendations are under examination,” the RBI said.

Among the recommendations that were accepted by the central bank was that the cap on promoters’ stake in the long run of 15 years may be raised from the current levels of 15 per cent to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank.

“This stipulation should be uniform for all types of promoters and would not mean that promoters, who have already diluted their holdings to below 26 per cent, will not be permitted to raise it to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank,” the RBI said.

The working group had also recommended a monitoring mechanism that may be devised to ensure that control of promoting the entity or major shareholder of the bank, does not fall in the hands of persons who are not found to be fit and proper. This recommendation was also accepted by the RBI.

–IANS

ad-rv/vd



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI keeps big business houses out of banking, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: Reserve Bank of India has not accepted a proposal to consider large corporates or industrial houses for a banking licence.

It has however allowed promoters of banks to hold up to 26% in their banks, which is a positive for many lenders including Kotak Mahindra Bank, IndusInd Bank, Bandhan Bank and CSB Bank. The new norms allow those who have already diluted stakes to hike their shareholding.

RBI on Friday said it has accepted 21 of the 33 recommendations made last year by an internal working group to review extant ownership and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks. A key proposal that was accepted was to increase the capital requirement for new applicants to Rs 1,000 crore instead of Rs 500 crore.

In November 2020, the Internal Working Group to Review Extant Ownership Guidelines and Corporate Structure for Indian Private Sector Banks had said that corporates may be allowed as promoters of banks only after necessary amendments to the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. This would enable RBI to have the power to do consolidated supervision of conglomerates.

It had also said that well-run NBFCs including those owned by corporate houses should be considered for bank licences. Industry insiders speculate that Bajaj Finserv, L&T Finance and Piramal might be the corporate houses still interested in pursuing bank licences. While Bajaj is active in most banking activities, Piramal has acquired DHFL as part of its goal to increase retail business and has bought in a former banker to head its financial services. L&T Finance had earlier declared its intent to pursue a bank licence.

The recommendation had faced criticism from several quarters and RBI too has been uncomfortable to allow business houses into banking. The regulator remained mum on this specific proposal but said that the proposals not accepted are under examination.

One of the proposals not accepted in full was that payments banks be allowed to convert into small finance banks after three years.

Current rules require promoters’ stake in private banks to be diluted to 15% after 15 years. According to sources, RBI agreed to this as the ceiling on the voting rights which a shareholder in a banking company may exercise has been raised by RBI in July 2016 to 26%, which is the level permitted in Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and the new limit aligns with the legislative intent. This is also consistent with the foreign direct investment policy.

Bankers said that a higher limit was required as it will enable promoters to infuse higher funds/capital which is critical for the growth of banks and function as a cushion during distress or a cyclical downturn.

Ashok Hinduja, chairman of IIHL, Mauritius, promoter entity of IndusInd Bank, said the increased promoter holding of 26% will benefit all stakeholders, particularly at this time when Indian economy is poised for exponential growth. “We eagerly await the operating guidelines as it gives the promoters an opportunity to inject capital to increase stake up to 26%,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI fines SBI, 2 payment system operators, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The RBI has imposed a Rs 1-crore penalty on SBI for contravention of the Banking Regulation Act and holding shares in borrower companies exceeding 30%.

The RBI had also imposed fines on two payment system operators — Tata Communications Payment Solution (TCPSL) and Appnit Technologies. TCPSL was fined Rs 2 crore for not meeting guidelines on white-label ATM deployment. Appnit was penalised for not following RBI norms on maintenance of escrow account balance and net worth requirement.

In a press release, the central bank said that during inspection of SBI, it was detected that the bank held shares in borrower companies, as pledgee, of an amount exceeding 30% of paid-up share capital of those companies. This is in contravention of sub-section (2) of section (19) of the Banking Regulation act.

“In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it,” the RBI said in a statement. After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing, and additional submissions made by the bank, the RBI decided that a penalty was justified.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI norms: No bank licences for large corporates yet

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


However, RBI has allowed promoters to retain a 26% shareholding in banks, higher than the current cap of 15%, bringing relief to bankers like Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Uday Kotak.

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has refrained from permitting corporate ownership of banks, putting on hold a working group recommendation that said large corporate and industrial houses may be allowed to promote banks post amendments to the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. The central bank has also not accepted a recommendation to allow well-run, large NBFCs, including those owned by a corporate house, to become banks. Both suggestions, it said, on Friday, are “under examination”.

However, RBI has allowed promoters to retain a 26% shareholding in banks, higher than the current cap of 15%, bringing relief to bankers like Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Uday Kotak. The 26% is in line with the ceiling on the voting rights of a shareholder and in keeping with the current FDI policy. The PJ Nayak Committee had in 2014 recommended a promoter holding of 25%, on the grounds that low promoter shareholding could make banks vulnerable by weakening the alignment between the management and shareholders.

Post the five-year lock-in, promoters can choose to lower holdings to below 26%. In the initial five-year lock-in period, the promoter’s stake must be a minimum of 40%.

RBI has simplified the ownership rules for non-promoter shareholders specifying a cap of 15% for all categories of financiaI Institutions, supranational institutions, PSUs and the government. It has retained the cap of 10% on the shareholding of non-promoter shareholders who are natural persons and non-FIs.

Though the preferred structure, an NOFHC (Non-mandatory Non-operative Financial Holding Company) will be mandatory only where the individual promoters, promoting and converting entities have other group entities, provided these promoters and entities are eligible to set up a Universal Bank or a Small Finance Bank (SFB). Banks that currently operate under an NOFHC can dismantle it if they do not have other group entities in their fold.

The initial minimum capital requirements for new bank licences have been raised to `1,000 crore for a universal bank from `500 crore at present and `300 crore for an SFB from `200 crore.

Future SFBs must be listed within ‘six years from the date of reaching the net worth equivalent to the prevalent entry capital requirement prescribed for universal banks’ or ‘10 years from the date of commencement of operations’, whichever is earlier. The internal working group constituted on June 12 last year, under the chairmanship of PK Mohanty, director, central board of RBI, had submitted its report in November 2020.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 29 30 31 32 33 16,279