SBI exploring ways to back startups with debt financing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India is trying to work out a way to debt finance startups as current rules allow banks to fund only profitable companies.

Startups raise equity funds to run their business. Promoters are forced to dilute stake as debt funding is not available to them because their companies are loss-making in the initial years, a senior SBI official said.

“We are struggling to debt fund startups. Bank norms and rules allow debt funding to only profitable ones. As initially startups are loss-making, they are to be funded based on the viability of the idea only. We are trying a way out,” Ashwini Kumar Tewari, managing director – international banking (technology and subsidiaries) at State Bank of India, said at the annual general meeting of The Bengal Chamber on Wednesday.

He said the bank was doing equity funding through SBI Ventures and recognised that the country needs to support the startup culture.

The number of government-recognised startups under the ‘Startup India’ initiative, launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in January 2016, has grown nearly 85 times. Their number has increased from 504 in 2016 to 42,733 in 2020, according to commerce ministry data.

Speaking about the economy, Tewari said despite a healthy recovery the country’s growth will be lower than 2019 due to the pandemic. “Large businesses are doing well. The problem is in the SMEs and the small sector. Large corporations are repaying more. Credit growth is driven by retail,” he said.

Referring to gold loans, he said that they are not popular in India but there are a lot of them which indicate the pain the normal people have suffered. “If gold loans are increasing, it is good for business but it is also a sign of the helplessness of normal people,” Tewari said.

The Bengal Chamber launched its Ease of Doing Business app during the day for industry stakeholders. Subscriber members as well as non-members can now make queries and take the benefit of experts of the chamber in diverse areas.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Gold Rates Fell To $1725/oz, US Home Sales And Treasury Yield Rises, Dollar Gains

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Kuntala Sarkar

|

Gold prices in the international markets failed to keep up a good hold since August 2021, and the same trend is being followed this month. Today, on September 30, the spot gold prices opened at $1726/oz, and staying only marginally above this range. Yesterday, both gold futures and spot gold prices have also fallen considerably at around $1730/oz. On the Comex gold December future, the price fell 0.63% and was quoted at $1726, and the spot gold ask price dropped by 0.42% and was quoted at $1727 as of 8.27 PM IST yesterday. Last traded Comex price stood at $1732, till yesterday. This $1725 range is a significant drop in international gold prices. Gold is a dollar-dominated asset class, hence the prices are correlated with the US dollar and US economic trends. Yesterday, the US dollar index too, gained marginally. Today is the last trading day of September, but gold traders are not very hopeful about the metal’s price range in the upcoming month, October.

Gold Rate Drops To $1725, US Home Sales And Treasury Yield Rises, Dollar Gains

US home sales rises, impact on gold

The reason behind the present downward trend is the gaining dollar index. US treasury yield rises, on the other hand, US home sales data is in an affirmative position. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) recently stated that the USA’s pending home sales index increased to 119.5 jumping 8.1% positively in August, following July’s drop of 1.8%. This data was 1.1% higher than expectations. US housing sales were up moderately after 2 months’ consecutive fall showing economic recovery. Hence, gold is now failing to hold even the $1740 level and lost this year’s psychological high of $1800 long ago.

Treasury yield increases

The USA’s economy is presently on a path of swift recovery and the trend is anticipated positively by economists, including the US Federal Reserve. The Wall Street Journal in a report mentioned, “New orders for durable goods in the US are expected to increase in August as business investment and consumer spending remain positive.” US Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s hawkish statement on the country’s economy has already hiked US treasury yield. According to experts, the US treasury yield curve steepening is driving the dollar index higher, at the same time dampening the demand for bullion.

Expectations on the PCE index

On the other hand, the US Core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index will be published. Regarding that, FXStreet stated, “Core CPI slipped from 4.3% to 4%, indicating a similar retreat in Core PCE – from 3.6% to a range of 3.2% to 3.4%. That would still leave underlying price pressures at high levels, supporting the case for a taper announcement in November.” Jerome Powell earlier indicated that they will announce a reduction in bond-buying in the next meeting. Tapering will again drag down gold rates globally. At present, gold is starting trading with marginal highs, but ultimately falling in the latter half of a trading day.

Impact in India

In India, MCX gold future rates also dropped by 0.39% and stood at Rs. 45,777/10 grams yesterday till last traded. Daily Indian gold prices too are not rising much, as the rates depend on international trends. However, it is a good sign for common buyers before the festive season in India. Gold is a long-term profitable asset and if the buyers can purchase the precious metal at low rates, it will certainly give better returns in the future.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bombay HC refuses interim relief to Yes Bank in a case against Asit Koticha, ASK Group, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Bombay High Court has refused to grant any interim relief to YES Bank in the ASK Group transaction involving founder Asit Koticha.

The bank wanted the court to direct Koticha to deposit about Rs 379 crore from the proceeds he is receiving after selling his stake in flagship group company ASK Investments to private equity major Blackstone.

In August, Singapore-based BCP Topco XII Pte Ltd, an investment vehicle of Blackstone, had entered into share purchase agreements with Koticha to acquire his majority shareholding in ASK Investment Managers Ltd.

“I have no manner of doubt that the balance of convenience is not with the plaintiff (Yes Bank),” observed the court in its 17-page order. “The prejudice that is likely to be caused to one or more of the many defendants far outweighs any possible prejudice to the plaintiff.”

Justice GS Patel, in his order of September 24, has now posted the hearing of the case to November 29

The genesis of the dispute lies in the credit facility of Rs 330 crore extended by Yes Bank in 2015 to Lily Realty Pvt Ltd, a company owned by Asit Koticha. At the time of securing the loan facility, Koticha had extended ‘Shortfall Security’ under which if the realty firm fails to pay its dues to the Yes Bank, he will pay the shortfall.

Later, Lily Realty was classified as NPA in February 2020.

Munaf Virjee, Managing Partner of law firm ABH Law that appeared for Asit Koticha, and Senior Advocate Ravi Kadam declined to comment.

A mailed query to Yes Bank did not elicit any response. Rohan Dakshini, partner at Rashmikant & Partners, who appeared along with Senior Advocate Dinyar Madon for the bank, also did not comment.

On August 30, 2021, Yes Bank issued a shortfall demand notice to Koticha asking it to fund the shortfall to the extent of over Rs 379 crore. When Koticha declined, the bank approached the court.

Koticha agreed to sell his majority stake to BCP Topco at Rs 707 a share, for a total consideration of over Rs 606 crore. However, from this amount about Rs 307 crore and Rs 145 crore would be paid to IIFL Wealth Prime and IDBI Trusteeship, respectively, under various debt obligations.

Lawyers for Yes Bank argued that whatever remains after paying both IIFL Wealth Prime and IDBI Trusteeship should be put in an escrow account or should be deposited in court.

However, countering this, Koticha, through his lawyers argued that this is nothing but a recovery suit.

“It cannot be that the attachment before judgment is obtained against Koticha here (High Court) and the final relief that is sought is to be obtained in the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) against Lily Realty and possibly also against Koticha as a personal guarantor,” argued the counsel for Koticha.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks to remain closed for 21 days, here’s the list, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There are as many as 21 holidays days in October for both public and private sector banks. These holidays include seven weekends, one national holiday and 13 state-specific holidays.

Banks all over India will remain shut on October 2 on account of Gandhi Jayanti, and banks, except those in Imphal and Shimla, will remain shut on October 15 on account of Vijaya Dashmi.

Apart from this, banks will remain closed for state-specific holidays. Some such are – across Gangtok, banks will be closed on October 1 due to the half-yearly closing of bank accounts, in Agartala, Bengaluru, and Kolkata banks will be shut on October 6 on account of Mahalaya Amavasye. In Imphal, banks will be non-operative on October 7 on account of Mera Chaoren Houba of Lainingthou Sanamahi.

Here is the full list of bank holidays in October 2021

October 1 – Half Yearly Closing of Bank Accounts (Sikkim)

October 2 – Gandhi Jayanti (Pan India)

October 3 – Sunday (Weekly off)

October 6 – Mahalaya Amavasye (West Bengal, Tripura, Karnataka)

October 7 – Mera Chaoren Houba of Lainingthou Sanamahi (Tripura, West Bengal, Meghalaya)

October 9 – Second Saturday

October 10 – Sunday (Weekly off)

October 12 – Durga Puja or Maha Saptami (West Bengal, Tripura)

October 13 – Durga Puja or Maha Ashtami (West Bengal, Sikkim, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, Manipur, Tripura, Assam)

October 14 – Durga Puja, Dussehra or Maha Navami, Ayutha Pooja (West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Tripura, Tamil Nadu, Sikkim, Puducherry, Odisha, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Kerala, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Bihar and Assam)

October 15 – Durga Puja, Dasara, Dussehra or Vijaya Dashmi (Pan India except for Manipur and Himachal Pradesh)

October 16 – Durga Puja or Dasain (Sikkim)

October 17 – Sunday (Weekly off)

October 18 – Kati Bihu (Assam)

October 19 – Eid-e-Milad, Eid-e-Miladunnabi, Milad-i-Sherif or Prophet Mohammad’s Birthday (Pan India except for Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Jammu, Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, Delhi, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand)

October 20 – Maharishi Valmiki’s Birthday, Lakshmi Puja, Id-e-Milad (Tripura, Punjab, West Bengal, Karnataka, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh)

October 22 – Friday following Eid-e-Milad-un-Nabi (Jammu and Kashmir)

October 23 – Fourth Saturday

October 24 – Sunday (Weekly off)

October 26 – Accession Day (Jammu and Kashmir)

October 31 – Sunday (Weekly off)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kerala High Court asks Dhanlaxmi Bank to adjourn AGM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday directed Dhanlaxmi Bank to refrain from concluding the annual general meeting scheduled for Wednesday (September 29). The single bench of the high court gave an interim order directing the bank to adjourn the AGM to a day after one month after transacting the businesses included in the agenda for the meeting.

The order by Judge PB Suresh Kumar came following a writ petition filed by KN Madhusoodanan, a shareholder of the company, P Mohanan and Prakash DL, seeking a direction to the respondents — the RBI and Dhanlaxmi bank — to discharge their statutory responsibilities under Section 160 of the Companies Act to inform the members about the candidature of the petitioners for the office of the director as mandated under Section 160(2) of the Companies Act.

The board of the bank arbitrarily rejected the applications of all five candidates, including prominent shareholder Ravi Pillai (B Ravindran Pillai) and former independent director PK Vijayakumar, filed under Section 160 of the Companies Act, a highly-placed source told FE. The petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

“The HC interim order has upheld the importance of shareholders in appointing directors. The bank rejected applications without any valid reasons. The AGM is supreme for any company, including banking company. Some of the directors who came to that position with the votes of majority shareholders are now behaving as if they were made directors by some other authority, and not by shareholders. The interim order of HC is an eye opener for all who try to belittle importance of shareholders in the administration of any company,” PK Vijayakumar said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kerala High Court asks Dhanlaxmi Bank to adjourn AGM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Dhanlaxmi BankThe petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday directed Dhanlaxmi Bank to refrain from concluding the annual general meeting scheduled for Wednesday (September 29). The single bench of the high court gave an interim order directing the bank to adjourn the AGM to a day after one month after transacting the businesses included in the agenda for the meeting.

The order by Judge PB Suresh Kumar came following a writ petition filed by KN Madhusoodanan, a shareholder of the company, P Mohanan and Prakash DL, seeking a direction to the respondents — the RBI and Dhanlaxmi bank — to discharge their statutory responsibilities under Section 160 of the Companies Act to inform the members about the candidature of the petitioners for the office of the director as mandated under Section 160(2) of the Companies Act.

The board of the bank arbitrarily rejected the applications of all five candidates, including prominent shareholder Ravi Pillai (B Ravindran Pillai) and former independent director PK Vijayakumar, filed under Section 160 of the Companies Act, a highly-placed source told FE. The petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

“The HC interim order has upheld the importance of shareholders in appointing directors. The bank rejected applications without any valid reasons. The AGM is supreme for any company, including banking company. Some of the directors who came to that position with the votes of majority shareholders are now behaving as if they were made directors by some other authority, and not by shareholders. The interim order of HC is an eye opener for all who try to belittle importance of shareholders in the administration of any company,” PK Vijayakumar said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kerala High Court asks Dhanlaxmi Bank to adjourn AGM

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Dhanlaxmi BankThe petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday directed Dhanlaxmi Bank to refrain from concluding the annual general meeting scheduled for Wednesday (September 29). The single bench of the high court gave an interim order directing the bank to adjourn the AGM to a day after one month after transacting the businesses included in the agenda for the meeting.

The order by Judge PB Suresh Kumar came following a writ petition filed by KN Madhusoodanan, a shareholder of the company, P Mohanan and Prakash DL, seeking a direction to the respondents — the RBI and Dhanlaxmi bank — to discharge their statutory responsibilities under Section 160 of the Companies Act to inform the members about the candidature of the petitioners for the office of the director as mandated under Section 160(2) of the Companies Act.

The board of the bank arbitrarily rejected the applications of all five candidates, including prominent shareholder Ravi Pillai (B Ravindran Pillai) and former independent director PK Vijayakumar, filed under Section 160 of the Companies Act, a highly-placed source told FE. The petitioners had to move their candidature under Section 160 of the Companies Act after the board decided to defer their candidatures.

“The HC interim order has upheld the importance of shareholders in appointing directors. The bank rejected applications without any valid reasons. The AGM is supreme for any company, including banking company. Some of the directors who came to that position with the votes of majority shareholders are now behaving as if they were made directors by some other authority, and not by shareholders. The interim order of HC is an eye opener for all who try to belittle importance of shareholders in the administration of any company,” PK Vijayakumar said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Soiled notes taking more space than usable ones, banks tell RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks have conveyed to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that soiled notes are occupying more space in chests than the issuable currency, seeking an urgent intervention. Even as overall cash in the system has gone up, soiled notes are occupying more space, a senior bank executive said, suggesting an increase the chest cash holding limits till the soiled currency notes are lifted.

“RBI can take a policy decision for increasing the cash holding limits of currency chests if the soiled currency notes exceed a certain percentage, say, 60% of chest space,” the banker said.

RBI regional offices can hand out approvals for increasing the cash holding limits, the person said. The central bank has embarked on a ‘clean note policy’, which includes retrieval and processing of banknotes received from currency chests and destruction of soiled banknotes in an automated manner.

According to the RBI annual report, there was a higher than average rise in banknotes in circulation in 2020-21 primarily due to precautionary holding of cash by the public due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The value and volume of banknotes in circulation increased by 16.8% and 7.2%, respectively, during 2020-21, as per the report. In value terms, the share of Rs 500 and Rs 2,000 banknotes together accounted for 85.7% of the total value of banknotes in circulation as on March 31, 2021, against 83.4% a year earlier. The report further said the pandemic also affected disposal of soiled banknotes although it was expedited during the latter part of 2020-21.

“Despite efforts, the year as a whole still witnessed a 32% decline in the disposal of soiled banknotes as compared to the previous year,” the report noted. At present, there are 3,054 currency chests of which 55% are with the State Bank of India (SBI).

“We anticipate that as the informal economy gathers pace as the country emerges from the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic, there will be a greater demand for currency notes,” a second bank executive said.

Some industry participants suggest that the central bank should comprehensively update its currency chest policy. “They should allow private third party non-banking entities to operate currency chests for greater cost efficiency,” said Rituraj Sinha, group MD at private security firm SIS India.

RBI is in the process of introducing varnished banknotes in Rs 100 denomination on a field trial basis with a view to elongate the life of the banknotes.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Rajesh Dahiya quits Axis Bank, to pursue ESG initiatives, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Bank executive director and strategy head Rajesh Dahiya has quit the private lender to pursue work in theEnvironmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) sector. Dahiya who will be associated with the bank in his current role till December 31, 2021, will continue to participate in the social work carried out by Axis Foundation. Dahiya who has quit his executive role at the lender, has sought early retirement from the services of the bank, to pursue personal and professional interests outside his executive corporate career.

“I have requested the Axis Bank board to be redeemed from the executive position at the bank, but I will continue to be associated with the bank in various other capacity, like I will continue to be on the board of Axis Bank foundation and a few other bank subsidiaries including Max board,” Rajesh Dahiya, ED, Axis Bank told ET. “I will continue to lead the sustainability initiative for the bank.”

Dahiya has consented to be closely associated with the Bank through specific projects and assignments. He will continue as a key board member for associates & subsidiaries including Axis Bank Foundation, Axis Trustee and Max Life.

Dahiya had joined the Bank in June 2010, after a successful stint of 20 years across various group companies of the Tata Group. During his over 11 years stint with the Bank, he has worked in various Corporate functions and was last responsible for Corporate Centre of the Bank as Executive Director on the Board of the Bank.

“I have devoted a large part of the last 10 years in the social sector and want to spend some time and my personal resources directly working with rural India, women livelihood and sustainability,” Dahiya said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kerala HC stays conclusion of Dhanlaxmi Bank’s AGM, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


KOCHI: The high court of Kerala through an interim order stayed the conclusion of the AGM of Thrissur-headquartered Dhanlaxmi Bank, which had been scheduled to be held on Wednesday.

Four stakeholders – one of them a former board member and three who expressed their interest to become board members – had filed the plea to stay the conclusion of the AGM.

The petitioners were P K Vijayakumar, former director of the bank, KM Madhusoodanan, P. Mohanan and Prakash DL.

“In the light of the discussion aforesaid, having regard to the peculiar facts of this case, I deem it appropriate to pass an interim order directing the Bank to refrain from concluding the Annual General Meeting scheduled for today. Ordered accordingly. It is made clear that this order will not preclude the Bank from transacting the businesses included in the agenda for the meeting. Needless to say that after transacting the businesses included in the agenda for the meeting, the meeting shall be adjourned to a day after one month. The Bank would be free to issue appropriate communication to the Securities and Exchange Board of India concerning the businesses transacted in the Annual General Meeting,” the High Court order said.

The petitioners had alleged that the Annual General Meeting of the Bank, scheduled to take place on 29.09.2021 and that they were informed that the Board has decided on 20.09.2021 not to place the notices issued by the petitioners under Section 160 of the Act in the ensuing Annual General Meeting of the bank or any adjournment thereof.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee (the NRC), constituted in terms of Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act), after conducting due diligence, had recommended to the Board of Directors of the Bank to appoint two of the petitioners as the Directors of the Bank. And, according to the Companies Act, once the NRC of the Bank makes a recommendation, it is obligatory on the part of the Board to place the recommendation before the General Meeting of the Bank for appropriate decision. It is stated that since the Board has not acted upon the recommendation of the NRC to appoint petitioners 2 and 3 as Directors, they have given notice under Section 160 of the Act signifying their candidature as Directors of the Bank.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 272 273 274 275 276 16,283