Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks made Rs 9,700 crore in hidden exchange rate markups on currency conversions, payments and card sales and Rs 16,600 crore on forex transaction fees in 2020, according to a new study.

While the overall amount Indians have spent on transaction fees for sending money abroad has decreased over the past five years, the fees paid to exchange rate margins are growing. “This highlights lack of transparency in remittance fee structures, putting consumers at risk of hidden fees as they unknowingly pay more than advertised for the remittance service in the form of a marked up exchange rate,” said Wise, which released the study.

Undisclosed markup

The upfront fee can vary but would often not represent the total cost of the transaction as traditional banks and providers tend to add an undisclosed markup on the exchange rate, instead of using the fair, mid-market rate. The difference between the rates results in a hidden fee unnecessarily costs people a lot more when sending money abroad.

Fee reduction

Banks have been reducing the fees on foreign remittances and their income under this head fell from Rs 15,017 crore in 2016 to Rs 12,142 crore in 2019.

However, they have protected themselves by recovering Rs 4,422 crore through exchange mark-up in 2020, which was up from Rs 2,505 crore in 2016.

These figures were from independent research carried out by Capital Economics in August 2021, which aimed to estimate the scale of foreign exchange transaction fees in India.

Overseas workers lose

Overseas workers sending money to India are also losing money. Over the past five years, money lost to exchange rate margins on inward remittances has grown from Rs 4,200 crore to Rs 7,900 crore. Meanwhile, fees paid to transaction costs have grown from Rs 10,200 crore in 2016 to Rs 14,000 crore in 2020.

Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020

Of total fees paid on inward remittances to India in 2020, Saudi Arabia ranked first at 24%, followed by the US (18%), the UK (15%), Qatar (8%), Canada (6%), Oman (5%), (5%), Kuwait (5%), and Australia (4%).

Indian consumers spending abroad paid Rs 1,441 crore as transactions fees, of which Rs 1,303 crore were hidden charges in the form of exchange mark-up.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UCO Bank Q2 net soars nearly 7-fold, asset quality improves

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


During a virtual press conference after declaring the results, Uco Bank MD & CEO AK Goel, without mentioning the name of Srei, said, “It will be very premature to talk about the bad loan recovery from the two NBFCs. But, we will remain optimistic that a good recovery should come (through insolvency resolution process).”

Buoyed by an increase in operating profit and a decrease in provisions, state-run Uco Bank on Thursday reported a nearly sevenfold year-on-year jump in its net profit to Rs 205.39 crore for the second quarter this fiscal from Rs 30.12 crore for the same period last fiscal.

The city-based lender, which recently came out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) measure of Reserve Bank of India, showed a significant improvement in its asset quality during the second quarter despite the fact that it recognised its exposure of around Rs 1,000 crore in Srei Infrastructure Finance and Srei Equipment Finance as non-performing assets (NPAs).

The Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) earlier this month gave its approval to start insolvency proceedings against Srei Infrastructure Finance and its wholly-owned subsidiary Srei Equipment Finance after the RBI had filed insolvency applications against the two non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).

During a virtual press conference after declaring the results, Uco Bank MD & CEO AK Goel, without mentioning the name of Srei, said, “It will be very premature to talk about the bad loan recovery from the two NBFCs. But, we will remain optimistic that a good recovery should come (through insolvency resolution process).”

During the second quarter, the bank’s NPAs in absolute terms fell 3.64% quarter-on-quarter to Rs 10,909.79 crore from Rs 11,321.76 crore in the first quarter this fiscal. The Gross NPA ratio during the quarter under review declined 39 basis points sequentially at 8.98%.

Provision for NPAs declined 35.3% y-o-y to Rs 1,032.14 crore in Q2FY22 as against Rs 1,595.39 crore during Q2FY21.

Operating profit during the period grew 24% y-o-y to Rs 1,334.16 crore. Net interest income (NII) grew 14.68% y-o-y to Rs 1,597.73 crore, while non-interest income saw a 31.37% y-o-y growth at Rs 936.07 crore.

The lender’s domestic net interest margin (NIM) improved marginally to 2.9% from 2.88% during the corresponding quarter last fiscal. The bank expects its NIM to further improve to around 3% by the end of this fiscal.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank Q2 net profit jumps 164% to Rs 1,089 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


On the asset quality front, the gross NPA decreased by 13 bps on q-o-q basis, net NPA reduced by 21 bps to 3.26 % from 3.47 % q-o-q. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.88%.

Chennai-based public sector lender Indian Bank on Thursday reported a 164% jump in its net profit at Rs 1,089 crore for the second quarter of FY22 as against Rs 412 crore in the year-ago period. Total income stood at Rs 11,440 crore as against Rs 11,616 crore, registering a marginal decline.

Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, Indian Bank, told mediapersons that increase in other income and reduction in provisioning have helped the bank post profits in the second quarter.

On the asset quality front, the gross NPA decreased by 13 bps on q-o-q basis, net NPA reduced by 21 bps to 3.26 % from 3.47 % q-o-q. The capital adequacy ratio stood at 15.88%.

Jain said the fresh slippages were lesser at Rs 3, 952 crore as compared to Rs 4,204 crore in Q1FY22. Cash recovery was higher at Rs 831 crore and AUC (advance under collection) recovery was higher at Rs 775 crore compared to Q1. Fresh slippage as compared to y-o-y, was high due to corporate loans and crop loans.

Retail, agriculture and MSME (RAM) advances grew by 14%, 16% and 8%, respectively. RAM sector grew by 13%. Its contribution to domestic advances was at 60%, he said.

Net interest income (NII) declined by 1% y-o-y basis to Rs 4,084 crore from Rs 4,144 crore. However, on q-o-q sequential basis, it grew by 2%. The net interest margin (NIM) improved by 4 basis points (bps) on q-o-q sequential basis. It stood at 2.89% for Q2FY22 as against 3.06% for Q2FY21.

Non-interest income went up by 26% y-o-y and 8% q-o-q. It stood at Rs 1,966 crore as against Rs 1,558 crore in Q2FY21 on account of increase in recovery of bad debts (450%) and forex income (42%).

Advances grew by 5% to Rs 3, 85,730 crore from Rs 3,65,896 crore, primarily driven by growth in RAM sector (13%). RAM constitutes 60% of the total advances. The bank has focused on capital light growth in credit.

Total deposits grew by 10% to Rs 5, 51, 472 crore as against Rs 5, 01, 956 crore.

Current account savings account CASA deposits grew by 8% to Rs 2,25,309 crore. The share of CASA to total deposits stood at 41% while current account deposits grew by 14% and savings account deposits by 8%. Total business recorded a 8% growth, reaching the level of Rs 9, 37, 202 crore as against Rs 8,67,852 crore. On a sequential q-o-q basis, it increased by 1%.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Will focus on retail, corporate sectors for credit growth: Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, Indian Bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Currently, the bank has RAM-corporate split of 60:40, it may be go up or down 5%.

Indian Bank has more than doubled its net profit for the second quarter and said the focus areas would be improving CASA, quality advances, increasing fee-based income, improving collection efficiency, recovery of NPAs and digitisation. Shanti Lal Jain, MD & CEO, says the bank is adequately capitalised and does not need to raise any funds in near future. Excerpts from his virtual interaction with media.

How do you review Q2 in terms credit growth?

Gross credit of the bank has increased by 5%, led by the retail, agri and MSME (RAM) segment which constitutes 60% of the loan book. Our retail loan growth was around 14%, agri 16% and MSME 8%. RAM as a sector grew by 13%. There was a marginal decrease in corporate loan which was because of under-utilisation of limits being leveraged by the corporates.

Currently, our business growth is around 5% and we think that going forward, it should be between 8% and 10%. We will be looking for opportunities in both the RAM and corporate sectors for lending. Currently, the bank has RAM-corporate split of 60:40, it may be go up or down 5%.

What is your views on the trend on the slippages side? What are your targets on recovery this fiscal?

We have had slippages of Rs 3,952 crore in the second quarter, out of which around Rs 1,800 crore pertains to the NBFC which was recently in the news. If you exclude that, it is a tad above Rs 2,000 crore only. Our collection efficiency has been improving, and looking at the overall trend, we don’t have much worry about slippages. Recovery in the first half was to the tune of Rs 4,800 crore. In the remaining two quarters of FY 22, we are looking at recovering around Rs 4,000 crore. Put together, the recovery for FY22 should be around Rs 8,800 crore. We have Rs 22,000-crore exposure in NCLT and we expect good recovery from the tribunal.

What are your network expansion plans? Any capital raising in the offing?

The bank has rationalised around 250 branches as part of amalgamation of Allahabad Bank into itself. Currently, it has 5,759 domestic branches. We are planning to open about 100 branches in the current fiscal. Our capital adequacy ratio was at 15.88% in Q2 and we are adequately capitalised. In the current financial year, we don’t have any plans to raise capital. The government holding is around 80% and there is headroom for diluting the stake.

Bank has seen good traction in digital transactions. What are the plans on furthering it?

We have floated an RFP (request for proposal) with an objective of changing our operating models. We will be focusing on more digital transactions on both the liability and assets sides. The bank has seen 10% increase in digital transaction mainly due to mobile banking and UPI.

How many accounts will you be transferring to NARCL?

We have identified eight accounts to be transferred to the proposed bad bank, having exposure of close to Rs 1,900 crore. Indian Bank has invested Rs 20 crore in the bad bank.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Pre-bid meeting was scheduled to be held on October 22, 2021 at 03:00 PM. However, no bidder came to the meeting.

2. An e-mail dated October 21, 2021 was received from M/s Tech SIS Limited regarding the following queries related to the captioned tender. The Bank’s reply is as follows:

Sl. No. Queries raised Bank’s reply
1 Whether the service set up of OEM is mandatory or the service set up of the bidder authorised by the OEM is acceptable? (As it is not possible for the OEM to have its service set up at all locations). The service set up by the participating bidder authorised by the OEM is also acceptable.
2 Whether the terms of payment can be changed from 50% against delivery and 50% after completion of work to 60% against delivery and 40% after completion of work? Payment terms are as per the tender and no change is acceptable.
3 Whether the system should have a provision to integrate with CCTV and Building Management System? Integration with CCTV and Building Management System is not mandatory.
4 Whether unbreakable glass (IP65) with panic button is acceptable? IP65 specification is applicable for unbreakable glass.
5 Please confirm the specification of the cable. FR Copper armoured multistranded cable (4Cx1.5 sq mm) is required.
6 What would be the distance of last device and last keypad from the Main control panel? The vendors are required to visit the site to assess the position and distance themselves.
  1. The above Bank’s reply shall form part of the bid document/ Agreement.

  2. Rest of the terms & conditions and specifications of the bid document shall continue to remain same.

  3. The above amendments/ clarifications are issued for the information for all the intending bidders.

  4. The submission of bid by the firm shall be construed to be in conformity to the bid document and amendments/ clarifications given above.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Thiruvananthapuram had invited e-tender for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of X-Ray Baggage Scanner System at Reserve Bank of India, Thiruvananthapuram, through RBI Website and MSTC Portal on October 05, 2021.

2. In this context, it is notified that the schedule of events of the tender is modified as under.

Sl. No. Activity Existing Date Revised Date
1 Last date for submitting e-tender in MSTC Portal 14.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 14.00 Hrs 01-11-2021
2 Due date of submission of EMD 13.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 13.00 Hrs 01-11-2021
3 Date & time of opening of Part I of tender 15.00 Hrs 28-10-2021 15.00 Hrs 01-11-2021

Regional Director for Kerala and Lakshadweep

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2021-22/115
DoR.AUT.REC.62/23.67.001/2021-22

October 28, 2021

All Scheduled Commercial Banks
(excluding Regional Rural Banks)

Dear Sir/Madam

Gold Monetization Scheme (GMS), 2015

In exercise of the powers conferred on the Reserve Bank of India under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the RBI makes the following amendments in the Reserve Bank of India (Gold Monetization Scheme, 2015) Master Direction No.DBR.IBD.No.45/23.67.003/2015-16 dated October 22, 2015, with immediate effect.

2. A new sub-paragraph 2.2.2 (f) has been inserted to read as follows:

2.2.2 (f) Interest on premature closure of the deposit in case of death of depositor before and after lock-in period

The amount payable to the depositor shall be calculated as a sum of (A) and (B), as indicated below:

(A) Actual market value of the gold deposit on the day of withdrawal.

(B) Interest payable on the value of the gold for the period of deposit at the applicable rate.

(i) Before lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 6 months >6 months and ≥1 year and ≥2 years and
MTGD 3 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.25% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.00% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.75%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 1 year >1 year and ≥2 years and ≥3 years and
LTGD 5 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.00% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.75% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

(ii) After lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>3 years and ≥5 years and
MTGD 3 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>5 years and ≥ 7 years and ≥12 years and
LTGD 5 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.125%

3. A new sub-paragraph 2.2.2 (g) has been inserted to read as follows:

2.2.2 (g) Interest on premature closure of the deposit due to default of loan taken against MLTGD before and after lock-in period

The amount payable to the depositor shall be calculated as a sum of (A) and (B), as indicated below:

(A) Actual market value of the gold deposit on the day of withdrawal.

(B) Interest payable on the value of the gold for the period of deposit at the applicable rate.

(i) Before lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 6 months >6 months and ≥1 year and ≥2 years and
MTGD 3 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.375% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.125% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.875%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
Up to 1 year >1 year and ≥2 years and ≥3 years and
LTGD 5 years No interest Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 1.125% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.875% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375%

(ii) After lock-in period: The applicable interest rate shall be as under:

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>3 years and ≥5 years and
MTGD 3 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375% Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

Type of Deposit Lock-in period Actual period for which the deposit has run
>5 years and ≥ 7 years and ≥12 years and
LTGD 5 years Applicable rate for MTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.375% Applicable rate for LTGD at the time of deposit minus 0.25%

4. The Reserve Bank of India Master Direction No.DBR.IBD.45/23.67.003/2015-16 dated October 22, 2015 on Gold Monetization Scheme, 2015 has been updated incorporating the above changes.

Yours faithfully

(Prakash Baliarsingh)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank more than doubles net profit in Q2

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector lender Indian Bank reported a notable performance across parameters — double-digit growth in operating profit, more than two-fold increase net profit, reduction in net NPA, growth in CASA (current account savings account) and rise in businesses of RAM (retail, agriculture and MSME) sector – for the quarter ended September 30.

The Chennai-headquartered bank, which is now an amalgamated entity of Indian Bank and Allahabad Bank, reported net profit of ₹1,089 crore for the second quarter of this fiscal compared to ₹412 crore in Q2 of the last fiscal, helped by higher operating profit, growth in non-interest income and lower provisions.

Across parameters

Operating profit of the company grew 11 per cent to ₹3,276 crore (₹2,942 crore), on the back of 26 per cent rise in non-interest income at ₹1,966 crore (₹1,558 crore), aided by higher recovery of bad debts and forex income. Its net interest income (NII) fell marginally to ₹4,084 crore (against ₹4,144 crore).

Also see: ‘RBI should allow the rupee to appreciate’

“The bank’s net and operating profits have increased, asset quality is under control, growth is happening in RAM sectors, CASA continues to increase and improvements across functions such as digital banking,” said Shanti Lal Jain, Managing Director & CEO of Indian Bank.

Strong recovery

Total provisions were lower by 14 per cent at ₹2,187 crore (₹2,530 crore in Q2FY21). Loan loss provisions were at ₹2,216 crore (₹1,880 crore).

Fresh slippages were higher at ₹3,952 crore (₹249 crore), mainly due to an NBFC account that accounted for ₹1,821 crore.

“Barring this, slippages of about ₹2,000 crore is just 0.5 per cent of the book. But, higher recovery helped us to maintain the asset quality,” Jain said.

Cash recovery was higher at ₹831 (₹795 crore) and total recovery stood at ₹3,426 crore against ₹1,168 crore. Domestic advances grew 5 per cent to ₹374,508 crore (₹356,627 crore). Retail, Agriculture and MSME loans grew by 14 per cent (₹73,376 crore), 16 per cent (₹82,857 crore) and 8 per cent (₹70,268 crore). The three segments accounted for 60 per cent of advances.

Also see: Mobile payments growing faster than card payments

Total deposits grew 10 per cent to ₹551,472 crore (₹501,956 crore). CASA was maintained at 41 per cent.

Lower NPAs

Gross NPAs was at 9.56 per cent compared to 9.89 per cent in the year-ago quarter and 9.69 per cent in the previous quarter. Net NPA was higher at 3.26 per cent when compared with 2.96 per cent a year ago, but down from 3.47 per cent in the preceding quarter.

“Our SMA1 and SMA2 are decreasing and collection efficiencies are improving. With this trend, we don’t have worries on the asset quality side. Our NII has grown sequentially and we have brought the cost of deposits to below 4 per cent. Therefore, when the economy gradually hits the growth path, our credit growth will also happen. As a result, our interest income will increase,” said Jain.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

AU Bank reports 13% decline in Q2FY22 net profit

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AU Small Finance Bank reported a 13 per cent year-on-year (y-o-y) decline in second quarter net profit at ₹279 crore despite robust increase in net interest income (NII) as the bottomline in the year-ago period was bumped up by income from sale of part stake in Aavas Financiers.

The Jaipur-headquartered bank had reported a net profit of ₹322 crore in Q2FY21, including ₹126 crore from the aforementioned sale.

Net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was up 34 per cent y-o-y to ₹753 crore (₹561 crore in the year-ago quarter).

Other income, including processing fee, profit/loss on sale of investments, income from dealing in priority sector lending certificates, declined about 27 per cent y-o-y to ₹191 crore (₹261 crore).

The bank said profit on sale of investment for the previous year includes profit earned on sale of equity shares (part stake) held in Aavas Financiers.

Write-back

AU SFB received a write-back of ₹170 crore in non-performing asset (NPA) provisions in the reporting quarter. It had made a provision of ₹16 crore in the year-ago quarter.

Gross NPA position improved to 3.2 per cent of gross advances as on September-end 2021 against 4.3 per cent as at June-end 2021. Similarly, net NPA reduced to 1.7 per cent from 2.3 per cent.

Sanjay Agarwal, MD & CEO, emphasised that if the one-time gain of ₹126 crore due to part stake sale in Aavas is excluded from the year-ago period net profit, then the bank has posted a 42 per cent increase in net profit in the reporting quarter.

He observed that as the economy is improving, the bank’s customers are coming back on the loan repayment track.

Assets under management were up 24 per cent to ₹38,011 crore. Deposits increased 45 per cent y-o-y to ₹38,011 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Prohibition of UPI payments on crypto exchange WazirX challenged

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Delhi High Court, on Thursday, asked the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and State Bank of India (SBI) to respond to a petition seeking to direct the authorities to take back the decision to prohibit UPI payments on cryptocurrency exchange WazirX.

A Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh issued notice to SBI, RBI, National Payments Corporation of India and the Department of Financial Services, and asked them to respond to the petition. The court listed the matter for further hearing on December 24.

‘An arbitrary decision’

Petitioner Arnav Gulati, a law student and an investor, argued that he, along with the numerous account holders of SBI and registered users of WazirX, are aggrieved by the prohibition, which is arbitrary, and goes against the Supreme Court ruling in the case of Internet and Mobile Association of India, where the court had struck down the RBI circular prohibiting all banks to deal with any virtual currency or provide services for facilitating any entity in dealing with them.

“The Respondent No 1 (SBI) is directly involved in the matter as they have blocked and restricted the users and merchants to use the UPI deposits option on the crypto exchanges, thereby leaving users with no option but to use other payment deposit options, which take more time to get completed and extra charges like convenience fees, GST charges or service charges are charged, making it difficult for retail investors and users to get the funds on time,” said the petition.

“That the decision of Respondent No I is arbitrary, hasty, absurd, unreasonable and irrational, as all the respondents have never restricted the banks or other institutions in dealing with cryptocurrencies.

“That the Respondent No 2 (RBI) and others clarified in their notices and interviews that there is no objection with the Unified Payment Interface (hereinafter referred as UPI) system in the cryptocurrency exchanges and, therefore, the petitioner has approached this court to directing the Respondent No 1 (SBI) to take effective steps and take back the decision of prohibiting UPI Payments in the cryptoexchanges,” the petitioner added.

‘Violates SC judgment’

Advocates Siddharth Acharya and Simarjeet Singh Satia, representing the petitioner, said the SBI’s decision to block UPI services for WazirX is arbitrary and violative of the Supreme Court judgment of March 2020.

The lawyers said the PIL involved the interest of almost one crore retail investors of the WazirX crypto exchange platform, and sought direction to the authorities to take effective steps and take back the decision of prohibiting UPI payments in the crypto exchanges.

The plea said that in April 2018, the RBI issued a circular prohibiting all banks to deal with any virtual currencies or provide services for facilitating any person or entity in dealing with or settling them, including Bitcoins. Such services included maintaining accounts, registering, trading, settling, clearing, giving loans against virtual tokens, accepting them as collateral, opening accounts of exchanges dealing with them, and transfer/ receipt of money in accounts relating to purchase/ sale of virtual currencies, it said, adding that thereafter all the transactions related to cryptocurrencies via banking institutions were stopped.

“Later, the Supreme Court, in March 2020, passed a final order nullifying the circular of the RBI and paving the way for banks and their customers to deal in cryptocurrency. On the basis of the said order, the RBI issued another circular allowing the institutions under it to deal and facilitate transactions in virtual currencies,” it said.

The plea said that on September 15, SBI prohibited the use of the UPI platform for its account holders in the WazirX cryptocurrency exchange, which has now been challenged.

It sought direction to the RBI to regulate and govern the cryptocurrency sector, and thereby making provisions for the payment interfaces and decisions.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 150 151 152 153 154 16,279