‘Reserve managers should look beyond the traditional approaches to maintain and enhance returns’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve managers can deal with the low yield environment by increasing the duration of their portfolios, investing in new asset classes, new markets and more active management of their gold stocks, as per the recommendations in an article in the Reserve Bank of India’s latest monthly bulletin.

In light of the likely persistence of various structural reasons for low yields, it is imperative that reserve managers look beyond the traditional approaches for the management of reserves to maintain and enhance returns, emphasised RBI officials Ashish Saurabh and Nitin Madan in the article.

The authors observed that the first and foremost way to tackle the low yielding environment to increase return would be to increase duration of the portfolio.

“The countries with adequate reserves have sufficient cushion to take on more duration risk. Increasing duration of the portfolio is the easiest and immediate step that can be taken to enhance return by some basis points,” they said, adding, this should be combined with increasing investments in longer maturities.

Investment in new products/asset classes

The officials suggested investment in new asset classes entailing investing in products beyond the traditional investment avenues. They noted that certain products may be novel in nature as surveys and anecdotal evidence do not suggest usage of these products by the reserve managers.

In this regard, the authors referred to the usage of investment products/ asset classes such as foreign exchange (FX) swaps; Repo transactions; dual currency deposits; equity index funds; and increase credit risk of the portfolio.

Active management of gold

The authors opined that active management of gold can yield a decent return to the Central banks beyond capital gains. Some of the avenues for active management of gold include gold deposits, gold swaps and gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs).

Central banks own almost 35,000 tonnes of gold (World Gold Council estimate) which is around 17 per cent of worldwide available above-ground stocks.

Investment in new markets

The RBI officials underscored that there are some countries which are relatively stable financially, are highly rated and offer better yields than some of the G7 countries. While these countries do not have very deep sovereign bond markets, they felt that a reserve manager could invest a small portion of their reserves in these markets and generate that extra yield.

Another way to generate higher return is lowering the credit rating requirement and investing in emerging markets which provide higher yield.

“This, however, entails a higher exposure to currency risk as their currencies can be volatile. To mitigate that, the reserve managers could explore investing in US/Euro denominated debt of these countries,” said Saurabh and Madan.

The various options through which a reserve manager could invest in these markets are direct investment; passive funds; ETFs; Separately Managed funds/Customised funds/ETFs; and Total Return Swaps.

The authors observed that the choice of investment strategy, however, would require to be tailored to suit the risk appetite, investment priorities, skill sets and operational capabilities of individual institutions.

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 provides the overarching legal framework for deployment of reserves in different foreign currency assets and gold within the broad parameters of currencies, instruments, issuers and counterparties.

Currently, the law broadly permits deployment of reserves in investment categories such as deposits with other Central banks and the BIS; deposits with commercial banks overseas; debt instruments representing sovereign/sovereign-guaranteed liability with residual maturity for the debt papers not exceeding 10 years; other instruments / institutions as approved by the Central Board of RBI; and dealing in certain types of derivatives.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Suddenly Bitcoiners and Ethereans just swapped talking points, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Everything’s getting weird in the crypto world. But to understand what’s going on, I want to go back to our recent podcast episode with Aaron Lammer, an Ethereum true believer, who was asked what he thought about Elon Musk going after Bitcoin over green concerns.

Tracy: OK. Just one more, but on a day like today, when, you know, Elon Musk tweeted, Bitcoin fell 16%. Although, you know, as we’re recording this, it’s pared some of those losses, but all the crypto coins, all the crypto-related stocks are all falling. What was today like for you? Like what did your yield-farming portfolio look like?

Aaron: You know, I honestly didn’t even check like most of this yield stuff, just kind of happening in the background, I’ll look and see how much I’ve made, but I’m looking more at the prices of the tokens than yields. I think that there are people who are just seeking yield out there, but those are people who have a lot more capital to start with than I do and are, like, not wanting to risk it, but want to just earn yield on like stable coins. I’m primarily holding Ethereum and other DeFi tokens. So when I saw that I actually was happy because I’m in Ethereum. I’m a true believer. And I believe that Ethereum will pass Bitcoin at some point. And I am fine with accelerating that if it can pass Bitcoin by going up or by Bitcoin going down. And I love the hostility and the space between the two camps. It’s getting ugly out there.

So basically a couple of weeks ago, when Elon Musk went after Bitcoin and tanked the entire market, the reaction among (at least some) Ethereans was that it was good, because Ethereum has a plan to go green (which Matt Leising wrote about today) and Bitcoin will always be proof of work (which is electricity intensive). So if proof of work becomes vilified, then that’s good for Ethereum in the long run, even if in the short run they all collapse. That’s the theory anyway.

Except now Musk is sounding warm to Bitcoin again, talking about his discussions with miners regarding renewable-energy mining in North America. Actually, the full context is that Michael Saylor, the Microstrategy’s chief executive officer, is convening a meeting between Musk and various miners. And note he specifically cites ESG considerations in the second tweet:

So now you have at least some Bitcoin industry leaders trying to make a point of sounding “green” or ESG-friendly.

What’s interesting, too, is that while Bitcoin leaders start to tout their green bonafides, the Ethereum world is starting to sound like hard-money types.

A lot of people are talking about this Packy McCormick blog post about upcoming changes to the Ethereum protocol, one of which includes a plan to slowly shrink the available number of coins out there.

Substance aside, this is part of the new Ethereum rhetoric:

But EIP 1559 and Eth2 flip that. With Eth2, new issuance to reward validators is expected to drop dramatically versus Proof of Work rewards. With EIP 1559, by burning ETH in every transaction, assuming a conservative amount of daily transaction fees and that 70% of the gas fee is burnt and 30% is sent as a tip, then more ETH will be burnt than issued every day. Together, the supply of ETH will actually begin decreasing after EIP 1559 and the Eth2 merge. It’s better than sound money. It’s Ultra Sound Money.

So you have Michael Saylor talking about ESG, and you have Ethereum bulls talking about “Ultra Sound Money.” Not sure what it means, but it sounds like the End Times.

Meanwhile, both Bitcoin and Ethereum are surging today after a horrible weekend. So for all of the ostensible disputes between the two camps, they still trade more or less in unison.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

G-Sec auction falters yet again

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Government Security (G-Sec) yields rose on Friday as the Reserve Bank of India devolved a significant portion of the auction of three G-Secs on Primary Dealers, indicating its discomfort with the yields at which the market participants wanted to buy these securities.

Auctions held since February have seen significant devolvement as investors are demanding higher interest rates on government securities.

On Friday, the central bank said it devolved on PDs about 72 per cent of the cumulative ₹27,000 crore the government wanted to raise via auction of three G-Secs.

The auction of the floating rate bond, maturing in 2033, however, sailed through, with the RBI accepting the greenshoe amount of ₹2,000 crore over and above the notified amount of ₹4,000 crore.

PDs are a key link between the RBI, which is the debt manager to the government, and investors (banks, insurance companies, mutual funds, etc), providing liquidity and market making services in the secondary market. For underwriting the auctions, PDs earn a commission.

In the secondary market, the yield on the benchmark 10-year G-Sec (carrying 5.85 per cent coupon) and the five-year G-Sec (5.15 per cent) rose about 2 basis points (to 6.2324 per cent) and 6 bps (to 5.8506 per cent), respectively. These G-Secs were among the four that were auctioned today.

Price of G-Secs declined

The price of the aforementioned G-Secs declined about 14 paise (to ₹97.23) and about 24 paise (to ₹97.165), respectively.

In the five weekly G-Sec auctions conducted so far since the announcement of the Union Budget on February 1, the central bank has devolved one to three G-Secs on PDs in each of these auctions.

Marzban Irani, CIO, LIC Mutual Fund, observed that in the backdrop of oversupply of G-Secs, rising oil prices and US Treasury yields, the RBI needs to come up with a calendar to conduct special open market operation (OMO), entailing purchase of G-Secs of long-term residual maturity and sale of G-Secs with short-term residual maturity, for the rest of March 2021 to address the anxiety among market players about the adverse movement in yields.

Since January-end 2021, yield on the 10-year benchmark G-Sec has jumped about 33 basis points, with its price declining about ₹2.35. Yield and price of bonds are inversely related and move in opposite directions.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yield to maturity – The Hindu BusinessLine

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A coffee time chat between two colleagues leads to an interesting explainer on bond market jargons.

Vina: Do you think I should try my luck with the bond markets?

Tina: While stock and bond market prices are unpredictable, don’t leave your investment decisions entirely to a game of luck.

Vina: Agreed! Today while bank deposit rates are at all-time lows, I came across a bond that promises a yield to maturity of around 8.8 per cent. Interest of ₹88 on a bond with a face value of ₹1000, sounds like a great deal. Doesn’t it?

Tina: No, that’s not how it works, Vina. You are mistaking the yield to maturity for the coupon rate. The two are not the same.

Vina: Jargons again! What is the interest I will earn?

Tina: The coupon rate when multiplied by the face value of a bond, gives you the the interest income that you will earn. Yield to maturity is a totally different concept.

Vina: Enlighten me with your wisdom, will you?

Tina: When you buy a bond in the secondary market, its yield will matter more to you than the coupon rate or the interest rate that it offers on face value. Because the yield on a bond is calculated with respect to current market price – which is now the purchase price for you.

The current yield is the return you get (interest income) by purchasing a bond at its current market price. Say, a bond trades at ₹900 (face value of ₹1,000) and pays a coupon of 7 per cent per annum. Your current yield then is 7.8 per cent.

Vina: What is the YTM then?

Tina: The yield to maturity (YTM) captures the effective return that you are likely to earn on a bond if you hold it until maturity. That is, the return you get over the life of the bond after accounting for —interest payments and the maturity price of the bond versus its purchase price.

The YTM for a bond purchased at face value and held till maturity will hence be the same as its coupon rate.

Vina: Hold until maturity? The bond I was referring to has 8 years left until maturity. Too long a tenure, right?

Tina: Yes! The bond whose YTM is 8.8 per cent and has a residual maturity of eight years must be paying you a coupon of 7 per cent annually. That isn’t too high when compared to what other corporates have to offer.

Vina: So, should I now look for bonds that offer even higher YTMs?

Tina: Don’t fall prey to high yields, Vina. A high deviation from the market rate often signifies a higher level of risk. Higher YTMs are a result of a sharp drop in the current bond market price, which is most likely factoring in perceived risk of default or rating downgrades.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY