Bitcoin ruling roils crypto world seeking regulatory clarity, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Vildana Hajric and Yakob Peterseil

International banking regulators’ decision to classify Bitcoin as the riskiest of assets dragged cryptocurrencies further into the mainstream financial world.

It also made it extremely costly for banks to hold digital tokens on their balance sheets, potentially delaying crypto’s wider adoption.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed that a 1,250 per cent risk weight be applied to a bank’s exposure to Bitcoin and certain other cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin jumped on the announcement, then erased the gains. It was trading around $36,200 as of 10:30 a.m. in Hong Kong on Friday.

“The only consistency has been the volatility — it’s been big spikes, tons of enthusiasm, followed by big selloffs,” Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co., said of Bitcoin’s moves. “If you believe in it you’re probably to stomach the volatility, but if you’re just in it because it seems like the hot way to get a quick buck, that volatility is going to be hard to deal with.”

The ruling sparked a bevy of reactions across Wall Street and other financial centers worldwide. Here’s a sampling:

Luke Sully, CEO at treasury technology specialist Ledgermatic:
“It’s a piece of news that both advocates and critics of Bitcoin will declare as a win. It demonstrates that Bitcoin is now a recognized asset class with risk management parameters for the banks, but these same parameters could be a potential deterrent given the onerous capital requirements that may make it an unpalatable business,” he said. “There are a few underlying assumptions in this risk weighting, the most obvious being that the price may go to zero and investors could lose their full allocation. The capital requirements don’t protect the banks clients from transaction, settlement and FX volatility either.”

David Tawil, president of ProChain Capital, a crypto hedge fund:
To me, this whole thing, along with the IMF, is just a way for those entities to get involved in the conversation. In terms of putting these requirements it’s going to go ahead, and at least for now, take traditional banks that are traditional regulated by these regulatory entities essentially out of this game and that will allow for more and more alternative players, who are not regulated, to go ahead and to pull further ahead,” he said. “A regulator has very little upside and enormous downside — it’s like being a policeman. You want to protect people. So the furthest you can go in terms of lodging measures that stop activity, the better. And so, I think that they are for the first time inserting themselves. This certainly does not mean the end of cryptocurrency, the end of Bitcoin.”

Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Global Forex:
“I don’t think these things are good or bad themselves — it depends on what the objective is,” he said. “It’s not decentralized, it’s highly concentrated. Crypto was born in an age in which we had very extreme disparities of wealth and income — how can it not reflect that? The bulk of Bitcoin that’s owned by wallets have more than 100 Bitcoins, that’s more than $300,000 — how many Americans have $300,000 to put into crypto as opposed to retirement money?”

Matt Maley, chief market strategist for Miller Tabak + Co.:
“Obviously tougher capital requirements cause banks to have more capital on hand — that can have an impact on their earnings. The committee is saying because of risks involved — cryptocurrencies are very volatile — you have to have more capital on hand to protect against declines,” he said. “If it’s going to cost banks more to hold these cryptocurrencies on their books, they’re theoretically going to be less likely to hold the same kind of size as they otherwise would.”

Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said in a Bloomberg TV interview with Matt Miller:
“It is getting hammered, but you know what? It’s getting treated like any other higher-risk asset like subprime loans, or CDOs, or derivatives, or structured products. And it is a new product. It’s untested through economic cycles. It’s untested through liquidity.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian banks do balancing act between green commitments and coal financing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian banks have to delicately balance between the renewable energy commitments and funding coal-fired power projects that are required for growth. On the other hand, global banks’ green financing is outpacing fossil fuel activity.

India may build new coal-fired power plants as they generate the cheapest power, according to a draft electricity policy in February, despite growing calls from environmentalists to deter the use of coal.

“While India is committed to add more capacity through non-fossil sources of generation, coal-based generation capacity may still be required to be added in the country as it continues to be the cheapest source of generation,” the NEP draft read.

This may put more pressure on local banks to fund such ventures, after having suffered a bout of bad loans on power plants in the last decade.

SBI faces pressure

State Bank of India faces pressure from its global investors like BlackRock but also needs to finance coal projects to electrify more homes

International investors are increasingly restricting support to companies involved in extracting or consuming coal, yet nearly 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal plants and demand for power is set to rise as the economy recovers from the blows of the pandemic.

BlackRock and Norway’s Storebrand ASA, both of which hold less than 1% in the bank, raised their objections over the past year. Amundi SA divested its holdings of the lender’s green bonds because of the bank’s ties to a controversial coal project in northern Australia. State Bank of India hasn’t decided whether to help finance the Carmichael mine for Adani Ports Ltd, whose main shareholder is Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, following mounting pressure from climate activists and investors, Bloomberg reported in April.

SBI has been boosting the share of loans to the clean energy sector and it approved three times more loans to solar projects in the nancial year that ended in March than to the overall thermal sector.

That’s because there was hardly any demand for new loans from fossil-fuel producers last year.

The lender’s loans to the power sector stood at Rs 1.86 lakh crore or 7.3% of the total at the end of March with Rs 31,920 crore of loans to renewable energy.

In India, the shift away from coal will take time. Millions of citizens remained without power months after Modi’s planned deadline to electrify every home passed two years ago. The environment ministry earlier this year further delayed anti-pollution guidelines for power plants that use the fuel.

Global banks surge

Funding for global energy is at a tipping point. Green bonds and loans from the global banking sector so far this year exceeded the value of fossil financing for the first time since the clinching of the Paris Agreement at the very end of 2015.

Since the clinching of the Paris Agreement, the global banking sector has underwritten more than $3.6 trillion of bonds and loans for the fossil-fuel industry. No bank has done more–or taken more in fees–than JPMorgan Chase in the past five-plus years.

The same constellation of banks has originated more than $1.3 trillion of green bonds and loans to support climate-friendly projects over the same period. No bank has done less than Wells Fargo, which has arranged the lowest proportion of green financing relative to fossil fuel among the world’s largest lenders.

But the biggest surprise of all is that high finance may have just shifted into a new era. Led by underwriting from firms including JPMorgan and Citigroup, green bond sales and loans this year are outpacing new fossil finance activity for the first time since the Paris Agreement was announced at the very end of 2015.

The transformation in the capital markets–if it lasts–indicates that the world’s largest banks may finally be getting behind the movement towards a low-carbon future. It also may be a sign that financial giants are seeing an advantage to green projects from a profit-and-loss standpoint.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Survey, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


While traders were flocking to GameStop earlier this year, the stock was also capturing the imagination of U.S. teenagers, according to a survey from Wells Fargo.

A third of teens say they are learning financial lessons from the internet and social media, according to the survey of 13 to 17 year olds and parents of teenagers.

And almost half of the teens say they are more interested in investing thanks to GameStop, whose shares have surged due to its popularity among members of online investor forums.

The survey follows Fidelity Investments‘ launch earlier this month of a commission-free brokerage account for 13- to 17-year-olds that allows stock trading on a mobile app, as it looks to attract the next generation of investors.

The survey of 318 teens and 304 parents of teens conducted between April 20 and May 3, found that while 57% of teens say they are learning about finances from their parents and 47% say they are learning from school, 35% cite social media and 34% cite websites.

But parents had a different take with only 12% saying their teens use social media for financial education.

About 45% of teens said “the GameStop social media situation” boosted their interest in investing with 53% of boys claiming increased interest and 40% of teen girls, according to Wells Fargo.

As for cryptocurrency, 50% of parents say their teen knows more about bitcoin than them. However, while 58% of teen boys say they know more about bitcoin than their parents, only 33% of teen girls claimed to be more knowledgeable.

Still actual investing rates seemed much smaller with 17% of parents saying they opened custodial accounts to invest on their teen’s behalf.

About 13% encouraged their teen to play a simulated stock game. About 7% gave their teen stocks for educational purposes. However, only 20% of teens say their parents engaged with them on these activities, Wells said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

France’s banks are the greenest, JP Morgan makes most from fossil fuels, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


French banks are known for dominating their home market, but they’re considered also-rans on the global stage when compared with US lenders. That’s not the case in the world of green banking. Credit Agricole is the leading underwriter of green bonds, three places ahead of the much larger JPMorgan since the end of 2015, according to an analysis on activity from almost 140 banks around the world by Bloomberg. Two other Paris-based banks, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, rank in the top 10 in the league table.

French banks were early in identifying green lending as a way to differentiate themselves from their rivals, said Maia Godemer, a London-based researcher at BloombergNEF, a clean-energy think tank. Green debt offerings have been steadily increasing for the past five years, and 2021 is shaping up to be the biggest yet. Issuers have sold more than $187 billion of green bonds so far in 2021, almost triple the pace from the year-earlier period.

Global banks surge

Since the clinching of the Paris Agreement, the global banking sector has underwritten more than $3.6 trillion of bonds and loans for the fossil-fuel industry. No bank has done more–or taken more in fees–than JPMorgan Chase in the past five-plus years.

The same constellation of banks has originated more than $1.3 trillion of green bonds and loans to support climate-friendly projects over the same period. No bank has done less than Wells Fargo, which has arranged the lowest proportion of green financing relative to fossil fuel among the world’s largest lenders.

But the biggest surprise of all is that high finance may have just shifted into a new era. Led by underwriting from firms including JPMorgan and Citigroup, green bond sales and loans this year are outpacing new fossil finance activity for the first time since the Paris Agreement was announced at the very end of 2015.

The transformation in the capital markets–if it lasts–indicates that the world’s largest banks may finally be getting behind the movement towards a low-carbon future. It also may be a sign that financial giants are seeing an advantage to green projects from a profit-and-loss standpoint.

JPMorgan’s fossil fuel windfall

The largest bank in the U.S. is also the most entangled in the fossil-fuel industry. JPMorgan has pocketed an estimated $900 million in fees from helping arrange loans and bond sales for energy companies since the start of 2016. That’s 14% more than Citigroup, 40% more than Bank of America and 60% more than Wells Fargo, its closest competitors.

JP Morgan’s dominant position in this part of the investment banking business has attracted criticism from not only climate activists but also from its own shareholders. In response, the New York-based company unveiled a new round of steps designed to lower its exposure to corporate polluters by 2030. Among other initiatives, the giant bank pledged to reduce the carbon emissions of its lending portfolios for the oil and gas, electric power and auto manufacturing sectors.

Wells Fargo’s green footprint
In the fossil-fuel arena, Wells Fargo is a standout–and not in a good way.

The San Francisco-based bank ranks as the world’s second-largest arranger of bond sales and loans for fossil-fuel companies, and No. 4 by fees earned. For green bonds and loans, in contrast, Wells Fargo is the 50th biggest underwriter since the Paris climate deal, according to Bloomberg data. That disparity puts Wells Fargo in the position of the bank making the smallest effort to support the climate transition relative to its fossil finance. Wells Fargo said it’s committed to sustainable finance and has helped fund 12% of all wind and solar energy capacity in the U.S. over the past 10 years. In March, the company announced plans to deploy $500 billion to sustainable businesses and projects by 2030.

A renewable energy market

The underwriting market for renewable-energy companies is minuscule when compared with the funds that fossil-fuel companies are raking in. Since the start of 2016, renewable-energy producers have raised less than $160 billion in the debt markets, compared with the $3.6 trillion for non-renewable energy producers, according to Bloomberg data. This year, when one would expect the spread to be narrowing, green energy providers have received less than $10 billion from bond sales and loans, while fossil-fuel companies got almost $190 billion.The leading lenders to renewable-energy companies since 2016 include Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, BNP Paribas and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group. Bank of America was the top U.S. bank, placing 11th in the league table.

Coal bankers make money in China

So far in 2021, only $6.6 billion of bonds and loans have been extended to coal companies, down from $19.3 billion in the same period a year ago. The data support the growing unease among lenders to work with producers of a fossil fuel that emits the most carbon dioxide for every unit of usable energy it generates.

One of the few places where coal bankers are generating fees is China. Of the 10 largest coal bond underwriters since the start of 2016, nine are based in China. This group is led by Beijing-based Bank of China and Industrial Bank. The sole non-Chinese lender on the list is Deutsche Bank.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Study, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


US banks are expected to cut 200,000 jobs over the next decade as they strive to improve productivity and efficiency amid rising competition from fintech and non-bank financial institutions, according to a Well Fargo analyst.

Mike Mayo has predicted that US banks would cut 200,000 jobs, or 10% of employees, over the next decade, according to a report.

The Wells Fargo analyst has given a similar call in 2019 saying that technological efficiencies will result in the biggest reduction in headcount across the US banking industry in its history, with an estimated 200,000 job cuts over the next decade.

In the fresh call, he said, this will be the biggest reduction in U.S. bank headcount in history.

Low paying jobs at risk

Mayo said that low-paying jobs are most at risk, such as those in branches and call centres as banks adapt to the new realities following the coronavirus pandemic. He added that job cuts have been necessary as technology companies and non-bank lenders increasingly gained market share in the payment and lending business over the past years.

The analyst said, “If I was giving advice to my kids, I’d say you probably don’t want to go into the financial industry.” He noted that technology and customer or client-facing roles are probably the only areas that will see growth, emphasizing that “It’s likely to be a shrinking industry.”

Digitisation accelerated and that played to the strength of some fintech and other tech providers,” Mayo said. Banks must become more productive to remain relevant. And that means more computers and less people, he said.

2019 report

The Wells Fargo study in 2019 has said that the $150 billion annually that the country’s finance firms are spending on tech — more than any other industry — will lead to lower costs, with employee compensation accounting for half of all bank expenses.

Back office, bank branch, call centre and corporate employees are being cut by about a fifth to a third, with jobs related to tech, sales, advising and consulting less affected, according to the study.

“It will be a dramatic change in contact centres, and these are both internal and external,” Michael Tang, a Deloitte partner who leads the consulting firm’s global financial-services innovation practice, said in an interview in the Wells Fargo report. “We’re already seeing signs of it with chatbots, and some people don’t even know that they’re chatting with an AI engine because they’re just answering questions.”

Wells Fargo’s Mayo joins bank executives, consulting firms and others in predicting huge cuts to the banking workforce amid the push toward automation. McKinsey & Co. said in May that it expects the headcount for front-office workers — the bankers and traders historically seen as among nance firms’ most valuable assets — to drop by almost a third with the rise of robots.

Front-office headcount for investment banking and trading fell for a fifth year in 2018, according to Coalition Development Ltd. data. R. Martin Chavez, an architect of Goldman Sachs Group Inc’s effort to transform itself with tech, had said last month that all traders will soon need coding skills to succeed on Wall Street.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

JPMorgan, others discuss issuing credit cards to people with no credit scores, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


– JPMorgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo , U.S. Bancorp and other banks plan to share data on customers’ deposit accounts to extend credit to people who have traditionally been barred from getting them, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The plan, part of a government-backed initiative, will factor in information from applicants’ checking or savings accounts at other financial institutions to increase their chances of approval for getting credit cards, the report said on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. (https://on.wsj.com/3w3L6fK)

The move is aimed at customers who do not have credit scores but are financially responsible, the report said, adding that the lenders would consider applicants’ account balances over time and their overdraft histories.

The banks did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

The banks are discussing using credit-reporting firms, such as Equifax, Experian PLC and TransUnion , as well as fintech company Early Warning Services LLC, for this data sharing, the WSJ report said.

The new plan marks a significant contrast to the strategy generally adopted by lenders, who traditionally rely on credit scores to determine eligibility for a loan. Reforming credit scores is one of U.S. President Joe Biden’s many priorities as he tries to repair the financial wreckage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

US banks deploy AI to monitor customers, workers amid tech backlash, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Paresh Dave and Jeffrey Dastin

Several U.S. banks have started deploying camera software that can analyze customer preferences, monitor workers and spot people sleeping near ATMs, even as they remain wary about possible backlash over increased surveillance, more than a dozen banking and technology sources told Reuters.

Previously unreported trials at City National Bank of Florida and JPMorgan Chase & Co as well as earlier rollouts at banks such as Wells Fargo & Co offer a rare view into the potential U.S. financial institutions see in facial recognition and related artificial intelligence systems.

Widespread deployment of such visual AI tools in the heavily regulated banking sector would be a significant step toward their becoming mainstream in corporate America.

Bobby Dominguez, chief information security officer at City National, said smartphones that unlock via a face scan have paved the way.

“We’re already leveraging facial recognition on mobile,” he said. “Why not leverage it in the real world?”

City National will begin facial recognition trials early next year to identify customers at teller machines and employees at branches, aiming to replace clunky and less secure authentication measures at its 31 sites, Dominguez said. Eventually, the software could spot people on government watch lists, he said.

JPMorgan said it is “conducting a small test of video analytic technology with a handful of branches in Ohio.” Wells Fargo said it works to prevent fraud but declined to discuss how.

Civil liberties issues loom large. Critics point to arrests of innocent individuals following faulty facial matches, disproportionate use of the systems to monitor lower-income and non-white communities, and the loss of privacy inherent in ubiquitous surveillance.

Portland, Oregon, as of Jan. 1 banned businesses from using facial recognition “in places of public accommodation,” and drugstore chain Rite Aid Corp shut a nationwide face recognition program last year.

Dominguez and other bank executives said their deployments are sensitive to the issues.

“We’re never going to compromise our clients’ privacy,” Dominguez said. “We’re getting off to an early start on technology already used in other parts of the world and that is rapidly coming to the American banking network.”

Still, the big question among banks, said Fredrik Nilsson, vice president of the Americas at Axis Communications, a top maker of surveillance cameras, is “what will be the potential backlash from the public if we roll this out?”

Walter Connors, chief information officer at Brannen Bank, said the Florida company had discussed but not adopted the technology for its 12 locations. “Anybody walking into a branch expects to be recorded,” Connors said. “But when you’re talking about face recognition, that’s a larger conversation.”

BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

JPMorgan began assessing the potential of computer vision in 2019 by using internally developed software to analyze archived footage from Chase branches in New York and Ohio, where one of its two Innovation Labs is located, said two people including former employee Neil Bhandar, who oversaw some of the effort at the time.

Chase aims to gather data to better schedule staff and design branches, three people said and the bank confirmed. Bhandar said some staff even went to one of Amazon.com Inc’s cashier-less convenience stores to learn about its computer vision system.

Preliminary analysis by Bhandar of branch footage revealed more men would visit before or after lunch, while women tended to arrive mid-afternoon. Bhandar said he also wanted to analyze whether women avoided compact spaces in ATM lobbies because they might bump into someone, but the pandemic halted the plan.

Testing facial recognition to identify clients as they walk into a Chase bank, if they consented to it, has been another possibility considered to enhance their experience, a current employee involved in innovation projects said.

Chase would not be the first to evaluate those uses. A bank in the Northeast recently used computer vision to identify busy areas in branches with newer layouts, an executive there said, speaking on the condition the company not be named.

A Midwestern credit union last year tested facial recognition for client identification at four locations before pausing over cost concerns, a source said.

While Chase developed custom computer vision in-house using components from Google, IBM Watson and Amazon Web Services, it also considered fully built systems from software startups AnyVision and Vintra, people including Bhandar said. AnyVision declined to comment, and Vintra did not respond to requests for comment.

Chase said it ultimately chose a different vendor, which it declined to name, out of 11 options considered and began testing that company’s technology at a handful of Ohio locations last October. The effort aims to identify transaction times, how many people leave because of long queues and which activities are occupying workers.

The bank added that facial, race and gender recognition are not part of this test.

Using technology to guess customers’ demographics can be problematic, some ethics experts say, because it reinforces stereotypes. Some computer vision programs also are less accurate on people of color, and critics have warned that could lead to unjust outcomes.

Chase has weighed ethical questions. For instance, some internally called for reconsidering planned testing in Harlem, a historically Black neighborhood in New York, because it could be viewed as racially insensitive, two of the people said. The discussions emerged about the same time as a December 2019 New York Times article about racism at Chase branches in Arizona.

Analyzing race was not part of the eventually tabled plans, and the Harlem branch had been selected because it housed the other Chase Innovation Lab for evaluating new technology, the people said and the bank confirmed.

TARGETING THE HOMELESS

Security uses for computer vision long have stirred banks’ interest. Wells Fargo used primitive software from the company 3VR over a decade ago to review footage of crimes and see if any faces matched those of known offenders, said John Honovich, who worked at 3VR and founded video surveillance research organization IPVM.

Identiv, which acquired 3VR in 2018, said banking sales were a major focus, but it declined to comment on Wells Fargo.

A security executive at a mid-sized Southern bank, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss secret measures, said over the last 18 months it has rolled out video analytics software at nearly every branch to generate alerts when doors to safes, computer server rooms and other sensitive areas are left open.

Outside, the bank monitors for loitering, such as the recurring issue of people setting up tents under the overhang for drive-through ATMs. Security staff at a control center can play an audio recording politely asking those people to leave, the executive said.

The issue of people sleeping in enclosed ATM lobbies has long been an industry concern, said Brian Karas, vice president of sales at Airship Industries, which develops video management and analytics software.

Systems that detected loitering so staff could activate a siren or strobe light helped increase ATM usage and reduce vandalism for several banks, he said. Though companies did not want to displace people seeking shelter, they felt this was necessary to make ATMs safe and accessible, Karas said.

City National’s Dominguez said the bank’s branches use computer vision to detect suspicious activity outside.

Sales records from 2010 and 2011 reviewed by Reuters show that Bank of America Corp purchased “iCVR” cameras, which were marketed at the time as helping organizations reduce loitering in ATM lobbies. Bank of America said it no longer uses iCVR technology.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank’s interest in computer vision has not abated. Its officials met with AnyVision on multiple occasions in 2019, including at a September conference during which the startup demonstrated how it could identify the face of a Bank of America executive, according to records of the presentation seen by Reuters and a person in attendance.

The bank said, “We are always reviewing potential new technology solutions that are on the market.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Wall Street banks beat earnings estimates, see a boom ahead, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


From just a year ago when they provisioned for billions of dollars anticipating huge loan defaults due to pandemic, Wall Street banks are now an ebullient lot.

On Wednesday, executives at Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo posted a huge jump in earnings in the January-March quarter and delivered a bullish economic forecast.

Goldman and JPMorgan reported profits roughly five times as high as in the first three months of 2020, thanks to a combination of strong business results and a reduction in the amount of money they had put aside to cover losses on loans. Wells Fargo reported profits that were seven times as high.

JPMorgan

JPMorgan earnings skyrocketed 477% to $4.50 a share. Revenue climbed to $33.12 billion. But earnings got a big boost from JPMorgan releasing $5.2 billion from credit loss reserves.

Consumer banking revenue fell 10% to $6.7 billion. Investment banking revenue more than tripled to $2.9 billion. Fixed income trading revenue grew 15% to $5.8 billion, and equities trading revenue jumped 47% to $3.3 billion. Commercial banking rose 11% to $2.4 billion. Asset management revenue swelled 20% to $4.1 billion.

Goldman Sachs

EPS of $18.60 on revenue of $17.7 billion. Investment banking revenue jumped 73% to $3.77 billion. Fixed income trading revenue climbed 31% to $3.89 billion, and equities trading revenue surged 68% to $3.69 billion. Asset management revenue shot up to $4.61 billion vs. a negative $96 million a year ago. Wealth management revenue grew 16% to $1.74 billion.

Provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $70 million, compared with net provisions of $937 million a year ago.

Wells Fargo

EPS of $1.05 on revenue of $18.06 billion. Provision for credit losses decreased $5.1 billion. Consumer banking revenue was flat at $8.65 billion. Commercial banking revenue fell 12% to $2.2 billion. Corporate and investment banking revenue grew 7% to $3.6 billion. Wealth management revenue rose 8% to $3.5 billion.

The boom ahead

Wall Street banks now see consumers tanked up on stimulus money spending huge and companies rushing to expand by buying or building new businesses, as the US emerges from the Covid-19 pandemic

“It is clear to me that the U.S. is poised for a strong recovery this year, led by consumer spending that is rebounding to pre-Covid levels,” David M Solomon, chief executive of Goldman Sachs, told analysts.

Jamie Dimon, his counterpart at JPMorgan Chase, the country’s largest bank by assets, took a similar view. “We believe that the economy has the potential to have extremely robust, multiyear growth,” Dimon said in a statement. He attributed his outlook to government spending on stimulus and infrastructure, supportive policies from the Federal Reserve and high hopes for the end of the pandemic.

According to an executive, bank earnings reveal a dramatic shift from an unprecedented downdraft in growth to a V-shaped recovery in the economy.

Provisioning

The three banks are set to reduce the cushion they had set aside at the start of the pandemic to withstand continued losses from credit cards, mortgages and other loans they had made.

JPMorgan released $5.2 billion of that credit cushion, and Wells reduced its cushion by $1.6 billion. Wells also noted provisioning for bad loans was at a historic low. Goldman also reduced what it had set aside by about $200 million.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Global banks innovating in a borderless environment, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Global banks are tapping local talent and FinTechs in India to strengthen their global innovation capability across their presence in different regions. A centralised innovation team with local presence is a common methodology found across different global banks.

In an exciting panel discussion hosted last week on ‘Innovation In A Borderless Environment’ we explore how global banks are placed in developing their innovation capabilities.

Ash Malik, MD & Head-Technology Centres India, Deutsche Bank, said, “Deutsche Bank is a universal bank offering services from corporate banking to asset management across the globe and we believe in localization which means building deep expertise of the local market and reg environment on ground itself. We’ve regional SMEs in local markets globally aligned so we can provide support round the clock. In the first 6 months of 2020, Deutsche Bank transacted a record of $15 billion dollars of local issue currency and FX for clients across normal Asian market hours and this kind of intense customer focus led to Deutsche Bank being awarded crisis response year award in September.”

Malik explained that they have a local management structure which works closely with desks and play a critical role in establishing relationships with local government and regulators. Last year, DB became the first European bank to receive approval from SAFE Shanghai and to join its pilot payments rail and the objective is to expand cross border trade and simplify the payment process. DB customers now no longer have to perform onerous processes and instead connect to FX payments in seconds.

Malik adds, “Additionally we are partnering with FinTech companies across the region. Overall we’ve a global network of innovation teams across major centres and identify the adoption of strategic emerging technologies. We essentially do it for three key channels, a demand driven model where we co-innovate and collaborate with customers on ground, second, we’ve a scouting team and this team monitors key technologies and capabilities which bank considers strategic like cryptocurrency/blockchain which is going to be key for cross-border transaction this knowledge is used internally to innovate further and finally what we have is internal incubation where all employees in DB are given a platform to innovate.”

Rathnaprabha Manickavachagam, MD & Head-Innovation & Digital Transformation, India & Romania, Societe Generale, Global Solution Centre is driving innovation and digital transformation from India. She said, “We’ve a centralized innovation team headquartered in Paris which specifically looks at mergers and acquisitions like open banking models, collaboration with GAFAs, looking at a variety of ways for cross-border interaction. As they discover models, they work with 27 arms of the bank. Being an outpost in Asia, we’re extremely execution focused where we get different business use cases from businesses and give hands on solutions working with FinTechs and internal teams on emerging technologies. Major work is also delivered on value chain and product transformation.”

She explained how they interact with 16 innovation centres set-up across by Soc Gen, with additional smaller outposts in Singapore and Hong Kong. The innovation ecosystem is quite inter-linked across Soc Gen while we are connected on the strategy, we have a very good connection with extended teams of businesses in Asia, India and Romania, we can also work for the rest of the group in different regions.

She added, “We worked with 8 start-ups in Africa for our bank in the African region, we’ve that kind of mandate interlinked with strategic focus where businesses need help to improve product or topline or customer experience or introduce something new. The innovation set-up is centralized and local as well as convenience and strategic connects on specific projects.”

Ellis Wang, Sr EVP, Group Head of Technology, Transformation and Information at Mashreq Bank has executed a digital inside-out and outside-in strategy. He said, “Digital services became mainstream and we moved our applications to cloud to deliver seamless service. Our digital team is working on internal and external processes, by internally how we can adopt more digital to increase efficiency and reduce operational cost with higher STPs, more automation, etc. When we moved to cloud, we also explored allowing more touch points for our clients. Our innovation team is called ‘One Digital’ we also designed digital inside-out where we leverage APIs to service our clients for their requirements and different ecosystem services from e-commerce to insurance.”

At Mashreq Bank for Ellis the idea is to drive engagement by providing end-to-end service. He adds, “We also look at digital outside-in where we leverage external digital channels to target customers through these channels. We are preparing for hybrid operations. The One Digital team thinks about leveraging emerging tech to service corporate and retail customer base by knowing the customer base and tech.”

At Wells Fargo, Bharat Raizada, Lead-Chief Technology Office for India & Philippines has embraced cross-border capabilities over more than a decade ago and explains how as a part of global organisation innovation is being driven from India and Philippines.

Bharat said, “For innovation, there’s an organisation called Strategy Digital Platforms & Innovation which reports up to the CEO and is focused on driving innovation across organisation and driving value for customers. This SDI organisation works closely with all lines of businesses and has a presence in India and Philippines as well and we continue to work actively from a technology point of view to understand new innovation requirements from short and long term investment perspective.”

“There is a big play from quantum computing on how we can rapidly calculate risk on financial transactions as well as how we think of cryptography. How do we do interplay of data not only big data but small data too. A lot of the work gets done in India and Philippines,” adds Bharat.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2