No HC relief for Tatas on use of their trademark as crypto coin, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bitcoin may be a household name today, but there are various types of cryptocurrencies that exist. Ever heard of a cryptocurrency bearing the trademarks ‘Tata coin’ or ‘$Tata’?

Tata Sons, the holding company of the Tata Group, was unsuccessful in its bid to seek a permanent injunction from the Delhi high court restraining Hakunamatata Tata Founders and others from using the trademark ‘Tata’ as part of the name under which the cryptocurrency was made available to the public or as part of their corporate or domain name.

The domain names tatabonus.com and hakunamatata.finance that enabled the purchase and sale of the ‘Tata’ cryptocurrency were set up in June and May of 2021 respectively. The reason Tata Sons could not succeed is because it could not prove to the satisfaction of the court that the foreign parties (the defendants) intended to target India as a customer base.

No HC relief for Tatas on use of their trademark as crypto coinThe defendants in this lawsuit, filed by Tata Sons with the Delhi high court, were companies based in the US and the UK with no India presence. They were located outside the sovereign borders of India and statutorily outside the reach of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In this backdrop, the “intention to target India as a customer base was of paramount importance” for Tata Sons to make its case.

“The mere fact that the defendants’ cryptocurrency can be purchased by customers located in India and that, as a result, the plaintiff’s brand value may be diluted, even seen cumulatively, cannot in my view justify this court interfering with the defendants’ activities, or with its brand or mark,” held Justice C Hari Shankar.

The festive season can throw all your general perceptions about media ROI out of the window…

Apparently, the defendants’ cryptocurrency could be purchased — using the QR Code and the methodology indicated on the defendants’ website — by a customer located anywhere in the world. This factor therefore, too, cannot indicate any conscious targeting of the Indian customer base by the defendants. Nor do the websites or social media accounts prove any intent to target customers covered by the high court’s jurisdiction. “If at all they target customers, they target customers across the world,” the judge observed.

Tata Sons didn’t respond to an emailed query on the issue. Sources told TOI that Tata Sons is considering to pursue this case in the UK court.

Watch BE+ with Ambi Parameswaran: In conversation with industry leaders like Jasneet Bachal, Harish Narayanan, Deepali Naair, Siddhesh Joglekar and more



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

State Bank may look to finance Tata group’s Air India bid, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India is likely to support Tata Sons‘s bid to acquire state-owned carrier Air India.

The bank may subscribe to Tata Sons debentures or fund the special purpose vehicle (SPV) set up by Tata Sons for the acquisition, according to a report.

Tata Sons’s Air India buy may cost Rs 15,000 crore. The bank will subscribe to the debentures as Indian banks do not provide loans to corporates for acquisitions.

The lender is banking on the Tata Sons AAA rating, which signifies high safety and the prospects of Air India under the Tatas.

Tata Sons has a shareholder approval to raise Rs 40,000 crore while it Rs 10 lakh crore stake in TCS gives it financial heft to go for such a big acquisition.

Air India finances

Air India’s accumulated losses ballooned to Rs 70,820 crore in FY20. The earnings for FY21 haven’t been reported yet but the annual loss is expected to touch Rs 10,000 crore, from Rs 8,000 in the previous year.

Its revenue in FY21 more than halved year-on-year to Rs 12,139 crore. Air India’s total debt (according to provisional figures for FY20) stood at Rs 38,366.39 crore after transfer of debt amounting to Rs 22,064 crore to the special purpose vehicle, Air India Assets Holding Ltd, in FY20.

Tata group airlines

If it acquires Air India, the airline will compete directly with Vistara, another airline from the Tata stable. Bringing Vistara under the holding company with Air India could help with operational synergy and economies of scale.

Vistara’s loss for the year narrowed to Rs 1,612 crore, from Rs 1,814 crore a year earlier, having widened from Rs 831 crore in FY19. Its total liabilities at the end of FY21 were Rs 11,491 crore, while its net worth was a negative Rs 6,088 crore.

According to its latest annual report, Tata Group’s budget carrier AirAsia India’s net loss almost doubled in FY21 to Rs 1,532 crore and its net worth slipped into negative territory as the pandemic hit aviation globally.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lenders say they will get 26% of their dues, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The lenders to Siva Industries have told the National Company Law Tribunal that they will get 26% of their dues after taking into account third-party guarantors. Operational creditors will get part of their dues under the settlement plan, according to a report.

The deal has raised eyebrows as such offers by promoters were rejected in the past.

The NCLT, Chennai, has to explain the rationale behind the one-time settlement (OTS) offer made by Siva Industries under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The lenders have also been asked to give the timeline of cash flow to all the creditors.

Until the last payment is made to the lenders within the deadline of 180 days set in the OTS application, the liabilities of the company will not be extinguished, according to the report.

On the reason why they approved the 12A petition of promoters banks told the court that if a company is liquidated or in a resolution plan involving a third party, all operational creditors, including tax authorities, are wiped out

Also, the IDBI Bank‘s claim of Rs 644 crore will be paid while Blackstone-backed International ARC will get an additional amount of Rs 510 crore via land sale, according to the report.

The settlement

Lenders of Siva Industries and Holdings have approved a one-time settlement proposal from the promoter under which they will take a 93.% haircut and just Rs 5 crore upfront cash.

Of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore, the IDBI Bank-led lenders will get Rs 313 crore, excluding upfront payment, within 180 day of receiving NCLT nod.

They will recover Rs 318 crore, with Rs 5 crore as upfront cash, out of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore. This amounts to a haircut of 93.5 per cent.

The holding company owes financial and other creditors about Rs 5,000 crore. Tata Sons had filed a claim of Rs 863 crore against the Sivasankaran group company but that was rejected by the latter’s interim resolution professional.

The creditors received an offer from Mauritius-based Royal Partner for the company but that was rejected on the grounds that the investor had been unable to demonstrate its seriousness in completing the deal.

Unusual deal

Bankruptcy experts have termed the development unusual, citing the rejection of such offers by promoters in the past.

The acceptance of Sivasankaran’s offer differs from the usual pattern of rejection by creditors of such deals proposed by promoters seeking to withdraw their companies from bankruptcy proceedings.

Atul Punj of Punj Lloyd, Videocon’s Venugopal Dhoot, Sanjay Singal of Bhushan Power and Steel, and the Ruias of Essar Steel had all made offers to creditors to persuade them to drop bankruptcy proceedings. All were rejected.

In DHFL’s case, the promoter Kapil Wadhawan had offered to repay the debt in full, but the lenders ruled in favour of Piramal.

Experts say while banks may be getting the most out of such settlement in absence of any serious bid, but such a move weakens the IBC, especially Section 29A that bars promoters from bidding for their assets in a bankruptcy court. The Siva deal, if it goes through, could set a precedent of promoters striking settlement deals with banks when there are no bidders.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HDFC Bank to pick up 9.99% stake in Ferbine

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


HDFC Bank on Thursday said it executed an agreement for subscribing to 4,995 equity shares of the face value of ₹10 each fully paid up issued by Ferbine Private Limited for a consideration of ₹10 per equity share.

“Post investment, bank will hold 9.99 per cent of the equity shareholding of Ferbine,” it said in a regulatory filing.

The acquisition for cash consideration of ₹49,950 will be completed by February end, HDFC Bank said.

Kotak Mahindra Bank picks up 9.99% stake in Ferbine Private Ltd

Earlier in the evening, Kotak Mahindra Bank too said it has picked up 9.99 per cent stake in Ferbine.

Promoted by Tata Sons Private Ltd, Ferbine was incorporated on January 18, 2021, to make an application to RBI for the PUE (pan-India umbrella entity) licence.

For Tatas, Chandra’s 5th year at the helm may be best yet

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY