RBI ex-Guv Subbarao explains why RBI is anxious about cryptocurrency, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stated multiple times that it has “serious” and “major” concerns about cryptocurrencies without ever explaining what those concerns could be. The central bank’s aversion to virtual currencies is seen as one of the primary motivations behind the government’s bill to ban all private cryptocurrencies.

The crypto industry believes the central bank is looking at cryptocurrencies through a narrow lens and is failing to appreciate the various use cases for such virtual currencies. The industry’s argument is that cryptocurrencies are a digital asset, and not a threat to the monetary sovereignty of the rupee.

While concerns that cryptocurrencies can facilitate money laundering and terror financing are being expressed globally, RBI, on its part, has shied away from explaining its key concerns in detail, leaving the crypto industry scratching its head.

In an interview with ETMarkets.com, former RBI Governor Dr D Subbarao said RBI’s concerns over cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are three-fold.

Monetary Stability
RBI is the sole manager of currency in the economy and is responsible for the upkeep of the monetary system. Subbarao believes if virtual currencies gained traction, then it could threaten the monetary stability, as “it is quite possible that domestic price formation could be set in that virtual currency.”

Financial Stability
For Subbarao, the threat to the financial stability of the Indian economy from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin is simple. “If regulated institutions, banks for example, are exposed to virtual currencies and if that currency is very volatile, then there could be financial instability,” Subbarao said.

The former finance secretary believes the threat to financial stability is particularly large from virtual currencies that do not have an intrinsic value and are backed by just algorithms, like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Capital Outflow
Interestingly, Subbarao sees virtual currencies such as Bitcoin as a threat to the stability of the external sector of India. “Cryptocurrencies could become a conduit for capital flight, especially in a country like India where there is still no full convertibility of capital,” the former governor said.

In that light, Subbarao sees the efforts of central banks to create their own central bank digital currencies (CBDC) as a defensive mechanism. A central bank digital currency is a virtual version of the sovereign currency of the country and is issued by the central bank. This is different from private cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which is issued by private citizens.

Subbarao, who helmed the central bank during Global Financial Crisis as well as the infamous ‘taper tantrum’ period of 2013-14, is of the view that Facebook’s plans to launch a stablecoin back in 2016 (Libra) was the turning from when central banks saw cryptocurrencies as an assault to their sovereignty.

The former governor, who currently resides in Singapore, believes RBI’s primary motivation to launch a central bank digital currency is to not be left behind. “Main motivation is to ensure that it is not left behind in a world where CBDCs might become very ubiquitous,” Subbarao said.

CBDCs could also help the central bank reduce the high costs that it bears in printing and maintaining currency in circulation. However, in an economy where payment systems have already become very penetrative and virtual wallets are growing every minute, Subbarao sees little incentive for individuals to move away from private cryptocurrencies.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Subbarao, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The central bank can directly print money and finance the government, but it should avoid doing so unless there is absolutely no alternative, former RBI governor D Subbarao on Wednesday said while pointing out that India is ‘nowhere’ near such a scenario.

In an interview with PTI, Subbarao suggested that to deal with the second wave of COVID-19 induced slowdown in the economy, the government can consider Covid bonds as an option to raise borrowing, not in addition to budgeted borrowing, but as a part of that.

“It (RBI) can (print money) but, it should avoid doing so unless there is absolutely no alternative. For sure, there are times when monetisation – despite its costs – becomes inevitable such as when the government cannot finance its deficit at reasonable rates.

“We are nowhere near such a scenario,” he said.

India’s economy contracted by less-than-expected 7.3 per cent in the fiscal ended March 2021. For 2021-22, the deficit has been put at 6.8 per cent of the GDP, which will be further lowered to 4.5 per cent by 2025-26.

The Reserve Bank has lowered the country’s growth projection for the current financial year to 9.5 per cent from 10.5 per cent estimated earlier, amid the uncertainties created by the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic, while the World Bank on Tuesday projected India’s economy to grow at 8.3 per cent in 2021.

According to Subbarao, when people say the RBI should print money to finance the government’s deficit, they don’t realise that the central bank is printing money even now to finance the deficit, but it is doing so indirectly.

For example, he said, when the Reserve Bank of India buys bonds under its open market operations (OMOs) or buys dollars under its forex operations, it is printing money to pay for those purchases, and that money indirectly goes to finance the government’s borrowing.

“The important difference though is this when RBI is printing money as part of its liquidity operations, it is in the driver’s seat, deciding how much money to print and how to channel it into the system,” the former governor noted.

In contrast, Subbarao said, monetisation is seen as a way of financing the government’s fiscal deficit, with the quantum and timing of money to be printed being decided by the government’s borrowing requirement rather than the RBI’s monetary policy.

“That will be seen as RBI losing control over the money supply, which will erode the credibility of both the RBI and the government with costly macroeconomic implications,” he observed.

The RBI’s monetisation of fiscal deficit means the central bank printing currency for the government to take care of any emergency spending to bridge its fiscal deficit.

Asked whether a Covid bond is an option that the government can consider to raise some borrowing, the former RBI governor said, “It is something worth considering, not in addition to budgeted borrowing, but as a part of that”.

In other words, Subbarao said instead of borrowing in the market, the government could raise a part of its borrowing requirements by issuing Covid bonds to the public.

“Appropriately priced and structured, they can provide relief to savers who are short-changed by the low-interest rates on bank fixed deposits.

“Moreover, such Covid bonds will not add to the money supply and will not, therefore, interfere with RBI’s liquidity management,” he pointed out.

To a question on whether the RBI can generate more profits to help relieve the government’s fiscal stress, Subbarao said the central bank is not a commercial institution and profit-making is not one of its objectives.

According to Subbarao, in the course of its business, the RBI makes some profit and withholds a part of that to meet its expenditure and to build its reserves, and transfers the ‘surplus profit’ to the government.

“How much it can hold back for buffering its reserves is now prescribed by the Bimal Jalan Committee.

“The RBI should not do anything with the express intent of making profits,” he emphasised.

The RBI has transferred Rs 99,122 crore to the government as its surplus profit, nearly twice the budgeted amount.

Asked what else can the RBI do to help the economic recovery, Subbarao said since the pandemic hit us over a year ago, the RBI has acted briskly and innovatively.

“What the RBI can do going forward is what the Governor said in his recent policy statement which is to see that there is an ‘equitable distribution of liquidity, which is to say that the credit support must go to the most distressed sectors,” he noted.

To a question – can the RBI embrace even more unconventional policies, Subbarao said there are limits to what an emerging economy central bank like the RBI can do as compared to rich-country central banks like the Fed or the ECB.

“Developed economies have the policy room and the firepower to throw the kitchen sink at the problem. They borrow in hard currencies, which everyone craves.

“We do not enjoy those comforts. Moreover, markets are less forgiving of excesses by emerging market central banks,” he observed.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY