Top banks eye overseas AT1 bond sale as domestic investors turn wary, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As mutual funds turn wary of AT1 bonds, banks are looking overseas to raise capital through the instrument.

Five top lenders, including HDFC Bank, Axis Bank and State Bank of India, are looking to raise up to $2 billion overseas in the next few months through Additional Tier I (AT1) as they anticipate an increase in credit demand.

State Bank of India, plans to raise upto Rs 14,000 crore through additional tier-I bonds (AT1 bonds) in the current financial year (FY22) to enhance capital adequacy profile.

The Central Board approved the capital raise by way of issuance of Basel lll-compliant debt instruments in rupee and/or US dollar in FY22, the bank said last month.

Canara Bank is planning to raise up to Rs 3,400 crore in capital by issuing fresh AT1 bonds.

These bonds are expected to offer yields between 4 per cent and 5 per cent. Covering currency risks, the total cost may go up to 9 per cent.

AT1 bonds

AT1 bonds, also known as perpetual bonds, add to a bank’s capital base and allow a lender to meet fund adequacy thresholds set by regulators. Such securities do not have any fixed maturity but generally have a five-year call option, giving defined exit routes to investors. These papers are always rated one or two notches below the same issuer’s

general corporate rating. Domestic investors, including mutual funds, are wary of AT1 bonds after Yes Bank wrote off over Rs 8,000 crore of such bonds during its bailout in 2020.

State Bank of India was the only bank from the country to raise AT1 bonds overseas in 2016. Five-year call options on that series of AT1 bonds could be exercised this year.

Between FY18 and FY21, perpetual bond sales by banks have nearly halved to Rs 18,772 crore from Rs 34,860 crore three years ago. In FY22, AT1 bond sales have so far been negligible.

Sebi directive

Capital market regulator Sebi has eased the valuation rule pertaining to perpetual bonds in March last year.

The move came after the finance ministry asked the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) to withdraw its directive to mutual fund houses to treat additional tier-I (AT-1) bonds as having maturity of 100 years as it could disrupt the market and impact capital-raising by banks.

Sebi said the deemed residual maturity of Basel III AT-1 bonds will be 10 years until 31 March, 2022, and would be increased to 20 and 30 years over the subsequent six-month period.

From April 1, 2023, onwards, the residual maturity of AT-1 bonds will become 100 years from the date of issuance of the bonds.

In addition, Sebi said that deemed residual maturity of Basel III Tier 2 bonds would be considered 10 years or contractual maturity, whichever is earlier, until March 2022. After that, it will be in accordance with the contractual maturity.

AT-1 bonds are considered perpetual in nature, similar to equity shares as per the Basel III guidelines. They form part of the tier-I capital of banks.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI penalises SBI, 13 other banks for non-adherence to NBFC lending rules

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The banks were also called out on not adhering to restrictions and provisions on loans as well as advances and reporting to the central database on large exposures.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has penalised 14 banks including State Bank of India, IndusInd Bank, Bandhan Bank and Bank of Baroda for non-compliance of various lending norms. RBI found that these lenders were non-compliant with certain provisions of directions that the regulator had issued on lending to Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). The banks were also called out on not adhering to restrictions and provisions on loans as well as advances and reporting to the central database on large exposures.

In view of this, RBI levied a penalty of Rs 2 crore on Bank of Baroda. For Central Bank of India, IndusInd Bank, Credit Suisse AG, Bandhan Bank, Indian Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Utkarsh Small Finance Bank, Karur Vysya Bank, Karnataka Bank, South Indian Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, and Jammu & Kashmir Bank, the regulator has levied a fine of Rs 1 crore. State Bank of India, on the other hand will have to pay a penalty of Rs 50 lakh.

“A scrutiny in the accounts of the companies of a Group was carried out by RBI and it was observed that the banks had failed to comply with provisions of one or more of the aforesaid directions issued by RBI and/or contravened provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949,” RBI said in a statement. The regulator said it had issued notices to these banks seeking show cause as to why RBI should not impose penalty on them for non-compliance.

After examining the replies received from the banks along with oral submissions made in the personal hearings, RBI concluded the imposition of monetary penalty on these banks.

“The penalties have been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI under the provisions of section 47 A (1) (c) read with sections 46 (4) (i) and 51 (1), of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, as applicable. This action is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the banks with their customers,” RBI added.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes penalty on 14 banks for contravention of various norms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday said it has imposed penalties on SBI, Bank of Baroda, IndusInd Bank, Bandhan Bank and 10 other lenders for contravention of various regulatory norms, including on lending to NBFCs.

The penalty imposed on the 14 banks totals Rs 14.5 crore, with a maximum Rs 2 crore fine on Bank of Baroda.

As per a release, Rs 1 crore penalty has been imposed each on Bandhan Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, Central Bank of India, Credit Suisse AG, Indian Bank, IndusInd Bank, Karnataka Bank, Karur Vysya Bank, Punjab and Sind Bank, South Indian Bank, The Jammu & Kashmir Bank, and Utkarsh Small Finance Bank.

The penalty imposed on the State Bank of India is Rs 50 lakh.

Giving details, the Reserve Bank of India said scrutiny in the accounts of the “companies of a Group” was carried out and it was observed that the banks had failed to comply with certain provisions.

Notices were issued to the banks, advising them to show cause as to why a penalty should not be imposed for non-compliance with the directions/contraventions of provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The penalties have been imposed for non-compliance with certain provisions of directions issued by the RBI on ‘Lending to Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)’, ‘Bank Finance to Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)’, ‘Loans and Advances – Statutory and Other Restrictions’, and ‘Creation of a Central Repository of Large Common Exposures – Across Banks’, among others.

The RBI, however, said penalties have been imposed based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the banks with their customers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PVSLN Murty appointed as new chairman and MD of NEDFi, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


PVSLN Murty has joined as the new Chairman & Managing Director of North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (NEDFi).

Murty, a Chief General Manager and Chief Strategy Officer of largest public sector bank State Bank of India (SBI), brings with him 40 years of rich commercial and development banking experience in diverse and varied areas of Financial System.

Prior to joining NEDFi, Murty was posted as Chief Strategy Officer at SBI, based at the Corporate office, Mumbai.

Murty had also experience of serving the Northeast Region for over 3 years as Chief General Manager and Regional Head during the period of 2015-2018 while in SBI.

Besides serving as member on the Board of Directors of NEDFi from June 2016 to November 2018 he was also on the Boards of Indian Institute of Bank Management (IIBM), ATTF and many large Industrial Corporates. He was instrumental in bringing up APONGHAR a popular Housing loan scheme for the Govt. of Assam employees, in collaboration with Assam Government.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Vodafone Idea lenders dial Finance Ministry, want relief for telco, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A consortium of lenders to Vodafone Idea (Vi) has sought the finance ministry’s intervention to provide some relief to the cash-strapped operator, raising concerns over the telco’s survival amid dwindling cash balances.

The company’s shares plunged as much as 15% on the BSE Thursday, ending 8.8% down at Rs 9.07, after it announced a loss of Rs 7,000 crore in the March quarter on Wednesday.

The lenders’ move comes as the telco has written to the telecom department (DoT), pointing out that its fundraising talks have hit a wall because investors are wary of putting money into a sector hampered by “below-the cost” consumer tariffs. It has further said that it needs a year more to make spectrum payments of Rs 8,292 crore as it’s not generating adequate cash from operations and adjusted gross revenue (AGR) payments are siphoning away liquidity.

Banks remain Jittery

ET has seen a copy of the June 25 letter. “Last week lenders have written to the finance ministry and requested for relief, among which was deferment of spectrum dues,” said a senior bank official aware of the development. “Banks are a worried lot as they fear that no relief from the government could force the company into bankruptcy. They (Vodafone Idea) won’t be in a position to pay their dues.”

Lenders to the telco include IDFC First Bank, Yes Bank, IndusInd Bank, State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank and HDFC Bank, among others. “It is the policy of the bank not to comment upon individual account and its treatment,” an SBI spokesperson said. The other banks didn’t respond to queries.

Vodafone Idea lenders dial Finance Ministry, want relief for telco
Vi’s banks have been jittery for a while, fearing that the telco will fall behind on payments. As of last year, SBI had loaned Rs 11,200 crore to Vi, while PNB had advanced Rs 1,000 crore. Private banks led by IndusInd Bank (Rs 5,000 crore) and ICICI Bank (Rs 1,700 crore) are the other major lenders.

The company posted a loss of Rs 6,985.1 crore for the quarter ended March, wider than the Rs 4,540.8 crore loss in the October-December quarter, hurt by one-time expenses and continuing high depreciation, amortisation and finance costs and subscriber erosion.

Viability risks

The company again warned of risks to viability, which depends on raising funds, successful negotiations with lenders on continued support, refinancing of debt and monetisation of certain assets, among others. In the June 25 letter to DoT secretary Anshu Prakash, Vi flagged that the poor health of the telecom sector has been a deterrent in its efforts to raise Rs 25,000 crore via a mix of debt and equity, a plan it had announced last September.

“We are working on raising new funding for the last six months but the investors are not willing to invest in the company because they believe that unless there is significant improvement in the consumer tariffs, the health of the industry will not recover and they will incur a loss on their investment,” Vi said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI employees donate ₹62 crore to PM CARES Fund

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


About 2.50 lakh employees of State Bank of India (SBI) have collectively donated ₹62.62 Crore to the Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM CARES) Fund on the occasion of 66th Foundation Day of their Bank.

Last year, the employees of India’s largest bank made a total donation of ₹107.95 crore to the PM CARES Fund by letting go of one day’s salary and a day’s leave encashment.

Also read: Huge slowdown in credit offtake a cause of concern for banking industry: SBI DMD

Dinesh Kumar Khara, Chairman, SBI, said, “It is a matter of pride for State Bank of India that our employees have continued to offer banking services to our customers throughout the pandemic, putting service before self, in the true sense of the term.

“In addition, they have voluntarily come forward to contribute to the PM CARES Fund at a time when the government is strengthening the healthcare system to tackle the pandemic.”

The PM CARES Fund was set up by the government with the primary objective of dealing with any kind of emergency or distress situation as posed by the Covid-19 pandemic, and to provide relief to the affected people.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Jet Airways lenders face 95% haircut, but get 9.5% stake, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Financial creditors to Jet Airways will take around 95 per cent haircut with the bidder Jalan-Kalrock consortium pay Rs 385 crore against the total claim of Rs 7,807.74 crore.

The new owner will pay Rs 185 crore within 180 days after the start of operations of the company and the rest Rs 195 crore through issuance of zero-coupon bonds of Rs 1,000 face value after two years, according to a report.

The consortium would also give 9.5 per cent stake to the lenders in Jet Airways and 7.5 per cent in the loyalty program Jet Privilege Private Limited.

The claims

The total creditor claims of Jet Airways in NCLT are Rs 40,259.12 crore.

The total admitted claims are Rs 22,167.23 crore including Rs 7,807 crore from financial creditors. The domestic lenders owe Rs 5,776.71 crore to the airline. State Bank of India has claims of Rs 1,636.22 crore, YES Bank with Rs 1,084.44 crore, Punjab National Bank Rs 754.11 crore, IDBI Bank Rs 594.42 crore, Canara Bank Rs 543.61 crore, ICICI Bank Rs 519.08 crore, Bank of India Rs 263.57 crore, Indian Overseas Bank Rs 158.24 crore, Syndicate Bank Rs 169.73 crore, PNB Hong Kong Rs 42.98 crore, ICICI Bank ECB Loan Rs 9.86 crore.

Foreign lenders including UAE based Mashreq bank, France’s Natixis SA owe Rs 563 crore.

Operational creditors will get a maximum of Rs 15,000 each irrespective of the claim amount.

The company’s plans

The new promoters will infuse Rs 1,375 crore over the next two years into the company, of which around Rs 975 crore will be used for capital expenditure and working capital expenses.

However, National Company Law Tribunal has denied the earlier Jet Airways slots at airports saying the airline cannot claim historicity to obtain airport slots belonging to the airline as it didn’t have any operating slots on the day of the commencement of the insolvency process.

The insolvency

Jet Airways was admitted for insolvency on June 20, 2019, after all the attempts by the lenders to sell the defunct airline failed. The National Company Law Tribunal last month allowed the resolution professional for Jet Airways, to extend the corporate insolvency resolution process of the grounded airline by 90 days.

After Jet Airways went bust, the government temporarily allotted the hundreds of airport slots owned by it to other carriers to contain soaring airfares in the peak holiday season.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI sets July 30 deadline for banks to move current accounts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has set a deadline of July 30 for banks to give up current accounts of all companies where their exposure is below a cut-off decided by the regulator.

RBI communicated this in a letter to banks a fortnight ago, two senior bankers told ET.

The move, initiated more than a year ago, could trigger a migration of many lucrative current accounts – which lower a bank’s fund cost and cash management business – from MNC banks to public sector lenders and some of the large private sector Indian banks.

According to the new rule, a bank with less than 10% of the total approved facilities – which include loans, non-fund businesses like guarantees, and daylight overdrafts (or intra-day) exposure – to a company is barred from having the client’s current account.

“RBI is probably upset that banks are taking a long time to shift the accounts. But the delay may also be because several PSU banks may not be ready with the technology. Now, RBI can’t direct companies which have been doing business with a bank for years to move to another bank. At one point many MNC banks and companies had opposed it, but they have realised that it’s fait accompli,” said a banker.

Notified in August 2020, the regulation after a review was expected to be implemented by January 31, 2021.

Backed by a former chairman of the country’s largest lender State Bank of India and some of the PSU bankers, the regulation stems from the belief that errant corporate borrowers will find it tougher to divert funds if their current and collection accounts lie with lending banks.

Regulation doesn’t cover MFs, insurers
It’s aimed at curbing the practice of companies who run current accounts to collect sale proceeds and other receivables with banks outside the lending consortium to delay loan servicing.

Over the years, some of the MNC banks, without being large lenders, had put in place technology to integrate fund flows between a large company and its customers, vendors and associates. Besides enjoying the float, the relationship with the corporate opened an opportunity to cross-sell products to group companies. Significantly, it was a strategy to earn fees without committing larger capital for loans, and the risk of some turning into NPAs.

However, the present rule, said another banker, could also impact a few smaller Indian banks, including state-owned lenders. Some large private banks, who are in favour of the rule, have been raising their exposure above the 10% threshold to retain the current accounts. As per the rule, a bank having a current account with less than 10% exposure will be required to move funds to another bank which meets the exposure rule. The 10% rule does not pertain to regulated entities like mutual funds and insurers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks, experts pin hopes on bad bank to cut NPA pile, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARC) is likely to help banks cut their bad loan piles.

The bad bank and healthy provisioning buffers against doubtful advances should help India’s banks mitigate the impact of delinquencies and asset quality slippages in the aftermath of the second Covid wave, according to Boston Consultancy Group.

The formation of National Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd will help lenders keep up the momentum of recovery in stressed assets in 2021-22 (Apr-Mar), State Bank of India Chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara said.

Along with the resumption of courts and the roll-out of pre-package for resolution through the insolvency law, this will help banks make judicious use of recovery options, Khara said.

The NARC would help reduce sticky assets exposure to 1.8% – 2.3% of total loans, BCG said.

Asset quality is still a major concern for many Indian banks even as nonperforming assets (NPA), on average, could be contained, the global consultancy firm said.

Asset quality

“The second wave of the coronavirus pandemic poses risk to asset quality even as banks retain healthy provisioning buffers,” it said.

Banks have identified 22 bad loans totaling Rs 89,000 crore to be transferred to the NARC in the initial phase.

The State Bank of India plans to transfer bad loans worth around 200 bln rupees to NARCL.

The report also said that bad loans sold to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) as a proportion of banking system stressed assets increased to about 34% at the end of FY20, up from 25% in FY18, with banks taking a much higher haircut on these sales.

Haircuts on sales to ARCs have risen to 66% in FY20 compared to 62% in the prior financial period, it said.

The bad bank

The bad bank was proposed in the Union Budget for 2021-22.

In the last financial stability report released in January, the central bank said that banks’ gross non-performing assets may rise to 13.5% by September 2021 from 7.5% as of September 2020. In the event of extreme stress, the ratio could rise to 14.8%.

Former Reserve Bank of India deputy governor Rakesh Mohan has also warned that higher stress on assets in the banking system threatens financial stability.

Recoveries through various channels have bounced back to about 16% in FY20 from decadal lows of about 10% in FY16 before the pandemic struck.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI official, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks need to operate on lower net interest margins for the good of the economy, an official of State Bank of India said on Monday. Speaking at a webinar organised by MCCI, Deputy Managing Director V S Radhakrishnan said lenders must develop the capability to function with NIMs less than the existing 3 -3.5 per cent range.

“Working on lower NIMs is good for the economy, though high margins are definitely good for the banking system,” he said.

Radhakrishnan, however, said the right eco-system has to be put in place for banks to operate on lower NIMs. “High credit cost is one of the reasons for higher margins,” he said.

He also said lenders need to forge alliances with NBFCs and fintech companies to reach out to unbanked areas.

Radhakrishnan said low credit growth among large corporations is a cause for concern, as most companies are deleveraging balance sheets by accessing equity markets and selling non-core assets.

Asset quality is another worry for the banking sector as the real economy has been hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, he said.

“Rural demand has been affected due to the second wave and consumer sentiment is weak. Many people have lost jobs, too,” the SBI official said.

Radhakrishnan said he hopes that the RBI will continue to maintain its accommodative stance despite the threat of inflation.

“The central and state governments need to boost demand,” he said.

The infrastructure sector can be a big game changer for the economy, and foreign investors should be wooed to invest in this space, Radhakrishnan added. DC RBT RBT



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 12 13 14 15 16 23