Cryptocurrency to be regulated and gains taxed; govt to amend I-T laws, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the consensus on allowing cryptocurrencies gaining momentum, the government is mulling changes in the income tax laws to bring cryptocurrencies under the tax net, with some changes that could form part of the budget next year, a top official said.

Revenue secretary Tarun Bajaj said that in terms of income tax, some people are already paying capital gains tax on the income from cryptocurrency, and in respect of goods and services tax (GST) also the law is “very clear” that the rate would be applicable as those in case of other services.

“We will take a call. I understand that already people are paying taxes on it. Now that it has really grown a lot, we will see whether we can actually bring in some changes in law position or not. But that would be a budget activity. We are already nearing the budget, we have to look at that point of time,” Bajaj told PTI in an interview.

Asked if a provision of TCS (tax collected at source) could be introduced for crypto trading, the secretary said “if we come up with a new law then we will see what is to be done”.

“But yes, if you make money you have to pay taxes. We have already got some taxes, some have treated it as an asset and paid capital gains tax on it,” he said.

Asked whether people involved in cryptocurrency trading would be categorized as facilitator, brokerage and trading platform and how the taxation would be done under GST, Bajaj said “there would already be such things available in other services also. So whatever GST rate they are taxed at, that will be applicable on them.”

“They have to get themselves registered. The GST law is very clear. If there is an activity, if there is a broker who is helping people and charging brokerage fee, GST would get charged,” he said.

Separately, the government is likely to introduce a bill on cryptocurrencies during the Winter Session of Parliament beginning November 29, amid concerns over such currencies being allegedly used for luring investors with misleading claims.

Notably, there have been a rising number of advertisements, featuring even film stars, promising easy and high returns on investments in cryptocurrencies in recent times.

Currently, there is no regulation or any ban on use of cryptocurrencies in the country. Against this backdrop, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, last week, held a meeting on cryptocurrencies with senior officials and indications are that strong regulatory steps could be taken to deal with the issue.

Earlier this week, the Standing Committee on Finance, chaired by BJP member Jayant Sinha, met the representatives of crypto exchanges, block chain and Crypto Assets Council (BACC), among others, and arrived at a conclusion that cryptocurrencies should not be banned, but it should be regulated.

The RBI has repeatedly reiterated its strong views against cryptocurrencies saying they pose serious threats to the macroeconomic and financial stability of the country and also doubted the number of investors trading on them as well as their claimed market value.

RBI governor Shaktikanta Das too earlier this month had reiterated his views against allowing cryptocurrencies saying they are a serious threat to any financial system since they are unregulated by central banks.

The Supreme Court in early March 2020, had nullified the RBI circular banning cryptocurrencies. Following this on February 5, 2021, the central bank had instituted an internal panel to suggest a model of the central bank’s digital currency.

The RBI had announced its intent to come out with an official digital currency, in the face of proliferation of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin about which the central bank has many concerns.

Private digital currencies/virtual currencies/crypto currencies have gained popularity in the past one decade or so. Here, regulators and governments have been sceptical about these currencies and are apprehensive about the associated risks.

It can be noted that on March 4, 2021, the Supreme Court had set aside an RBI circular of April 6, 2018, prohibiting banks and entities regulated by it from providing services in relation to virtual currencies.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Parliamentary panel suggests capping ‘haircuts’ after furore over Videocon, Siva settlements, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A parliamentary panel has suggested having a benchmark for the “quantum of haircut” in an insolvency process amid instances of financial creditors taking steep haircuts on their exposure to stressed companies.

Besides, the committee has pitched for measures to prevent protracted litigations with respect to an insolvency resolution process.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), which came into effect in 2016, provides for a market-linked and time-bound resolution of stressed assets.

Emphasising that the fundamental aim of the Code is to secure creditor rights which would lower borrowing costs as the risks decline, the panel said there is a need for greater clarity in purpose with regard to strengthening creditor rights through the mechanism devised in the Code.

On haircuts

The committee flagged that “the low recovery rates with haircuts as much as 95 per cent and the delay in resolution process with more than 71 per cent cases pending for more than 180 days clearly point towards a deviation from the original objectives of the Code intended by Parliament”.

The committee particularly mentioned about the “disproportionately large and unsustainable ‘haircuts’ taken by the financial creditors over the years”.

In some insolvency resolution processes, the haircuts taken by creditors were more than 90 per cent.

“As the insolvency process has fairly matured now, there may be an imperative to have a benchmark for the quantum of ‘haircut’ comparable to global standards,” it noted.

A haircut refers to losses incurred by creditors on resolution of a stressed asset.

The suggestions have been made by the Standing Committee on Finance in its report on the ‘Implementation of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code – Pitfalls and Solutions’. The report was tabled in Parliament on Tuesday.

On delays

It is a matter of grave concern for the committee that the insolvency process has been stymied by long delays far beyond the statutory limits. It is disconcerting that even admission of cases in NCLT has been taking an unduly long time, which thus defeats the very purpose of the Code, the panel noted.

After about half a dozen amendments in five years, the IBC seems to have deviated from its original objectives, thanks to inordinate delay in resolution and the low recovery rate with haircuts running up to 95% in few cases, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance said in a report.

As many as 13,170 insolvency cases involving claims of Rs 9 lakh crore are awaiting resolution before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the report tabled in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday said.

The committee also pointed out that there have been instances of frivolous appeals, which further drags the resolution/ recovery process leading to severe erosion of asset value.

Abuse of provisions

The panel said it would therefore recommend that misuse/ abuse of well-intended provisions and processes should be prevented by ensuring an element of finality within the statutory stipulated period without protracted litigation.

There have been six amendments to the Code so far.

According to the committee, any legislative enactment and implementation need to constantly evolve to meet the challenges in the ever-changing ecosystem.

However, the panel said it is of the opinion that “the actual operationalisation of amendments made so far may have altered and even digressed from the basic design of the statute and given a different orientation to the Code not originally envisioned”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY