Shipping industry faces ESG heat from lenders, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON: Banks are demanding much stricter environmental criteria when financing shipping companies as investor pressure grows on the sector to accelerate going greener, according to Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

Shipping, which transports about 90% of world trade, accounts for nearly 3% of the world’s CO2 emissions and BCG forecast the industry will need $2.4 trillion to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

“ESG-driven requests are already prompting more action from banks. Shipping is already feeling it and they (shipping companies) are under pressure now,” said Peter Jameson, partner with BCG, which are consultants for the COP26 UN climate summit that starts on Oct. 31.

Standard Chartered has already provided loans linked to sustainability targets for drilling group Odfjell and the shipping division of Oman’s Asyad Group, the bank has said.

“When looking at lending on new assets, banks are going to create a bigger conduit for CO2 reductions through their policies,” Jameson told Reuters.

“The banks are also seeing insurance companies feeling shareholder pressure and this is also causing big pension funds to reassess.”

Leading shipping financiers currently provide close to $300 billion of lending to the industry annually, analysts estimate.

Of the $2.4 trillion that BCG estimates will be needed to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, Jameson said $500 billion would be required between now and 2030 with the remaining $1.9 trillion between 2030-2050.

The bulk of the total amount – around $1.7 trillion – would go towards developing future fuels.

“Funding sources are already becoming available, yet plenty more are still required,” Jameson said.

ESG-related assets under management are estimated to represent up to 80% of total lending to shipping by 2030, BCG said.

UN shipping agency the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has said it aims to reduce overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships by 50% from 2008 levels by 2050, but industry groups are calling for more progress from governments.

“The risks to balance sheets will start to force more questions being asked to the IMO,” said Ulrik Sanders, managing director at BCG, adding that this would “prompt more action towards decarbonisation”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI slaps penalty on SBI, StanChart

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1.95 crore on Standard Chartered Bank (StanChart)-India and ₹1 crore on State Bank of India (SBI).

In the case of StanChart, RBI has imposed the monetary penalty for non-compliance with its directions on ‘Customer Protection – Limiting Liability of Customers in Unauthorised Electronic Banking Transactions’, ‘Cyber Security Framework in Banks’, ‘Credit Card Operations of banks’ and ‘Creation of a Central Repository of Large Common Exposures – Across Banks’ .

Non-compliance

In the case of SBI, the central bank has imposed the monetary penalty for non-compliance with its directions contained in ‘Reserve Bank of India (Frauds classification and reporting by commercial banks and select FIs) directions 2016’.

RBI had conducted a Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE) of StanChart with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2020. The central bank, in a statement, observed that examination of the Risk Assessment Report, Inspection Report and all related correspondence pertaining to the same, revealed, inter-alia, non-compliance with the above-mentioned directions to the extent of: failure to credit (shadow reversal) the amount involved in the unauthorised electronic transactions; and not reporting cyber security incident within the prescribed time period.

Further, RBI found non-compliance with directions relating to authorising the direct sales agents (outsourced third party) to conduct KYC (know your customer) verification; and failure to ensure integrity and quality of data submitted in Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC).

RBI said, in furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for contravention of / non-compliance with the aforesaid directions, as stated therein.

“After considering the bank’s replies to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing, and additional submissions made by the bank, RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of contravention of / non-compliance with the aforesaid RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the bank, to the extent of non-compliance with the aforesaid directions,” per the central bank.

In the case of SBI, RBI had carried out a scrutiny in a customer account maintained with SBI and the examination of the scrutiny report and all related correspondence pertaining to the same, revealed, inter alia, non-compliance with the aforesaid directions to the extent of delay in reporting of fraud in the said account to RBI.

In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause why penalty should not be imposed on it for such non-compliance with the said directions.

“After considering the bank’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made by the bank in the personal hearing, RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of non-compliance with the aforesaid RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty, to the extent of non-compliance with the aforesaid directions,” the statement said.

In the case of both the banks, RBI said its action is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by them with their customers.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Analysts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


HSBC and Standard Chartered could face spillover damage to their profits and balance sheets from the debt crisis enveloping China‘s Evergrande Group even though the two banks say they have limited their direct exposure, analysts have warned.

Other banks and insurers could also suffer indirect effects such as loss of fees or a devaluation of their investments.

HSBC and StanChart make a big chunk of their profits in China and Hong Kong and they have been the foreign banks most involved in underwriting syndicated loans for developers there.

That means they are likely to face the most immediate second-order impacts, analysts at JPMorgan said in a research report.

HSBC and Standard Chartered both declined to comment on the report.

Evergrande has left global investors guessing over whether it will make a key interest payment, adding to fears of big losses for bondholders and sending tremors through China’s property sector and economy.

Hong Kong and mainland China accounted for around 84% of HSBC’s profits in 2020 while Greater China and North Asia contributed 81% of StanChart’s profits last year, according to a Reuters analysis of filings by the two companies – underscoring the region’s importance to their overall businesses.

The two have the most direct lending exposure among foreign banks to China’s property sector – $17 billion or 1.5% of group assets for HSBC and $1.3 billion or 0.5% of group loans at StanChart, according to JPMorgan.

The property sector contributes 14% of China’s GDP or 25% if indirect contributions are included, JPMorgan said, and property loans are worth some 6.6% of total loans, meaning a hit to the sector could have significant wider economic impacts.

HSBC and Standard Chartered have both said they have no direct exposure to Evergrande, and that they have taken steps in recent years to carefully manage their exposures to any one sector.

HSBC has already sold all positions in its China bond or Asia credit portfolios with exposure to Evergrande, a source at the bank said.

Citing Dealogic data, JPMorgan said HSBC has been involved in underwriting 39 outstanding syndicated loans for Chinese developers while StanChart has worked on 18 such deals, which could come under pressure if there are wider property sector defaults.

In a syndicated loan banks typically underwrite the deal and then sell the debt to other investors, but may keep some of the exposure on their books.

“There is a risk that this is not an idiosyncratic event but an industry-wide problem which could result in significant spillover damage,” JPMorgan said.

The US bank said it estimates there could be a further 11 defaults worth some $30 billion this year across the Chinese high-yield property sector, amounting to a 23% default rate.

Market chill

Other European financial firms also face a negative impact on business lines such as capital markets, asset management and private banking, said Dierk Brandenburg, head of financial institutions at ratings agency Scope.

“These will impact the profit and loss figures of Europe’s globally active banks in the coming quarters, as could the ensuing regulatory crackdown by Chinese authorities,” he said.

Chinese real-estate companies have tapped the public US dollar bond market for $274 billion in the past five years, Scope analysts said, citing Bond Radar data, suggesting foreign banks could lose out on fees if such deals dwindle.

Insurers’ investment portfolios could also be affected, said Volker Kudszus, Sector Lead for EMEA Insurance at S&P Global Ratings.

“We are not concerned by direct exposure of European insurers to Evergrande, but indirect exposure, e.g. through investments in the Chinese equity or real estate market, might see some volatility,” Kudszus said.

Insurers Prudential, Ageas and Swiss Re were likely to have the most exposure to Chinese real estate, Morningstar analysts said this week.

Ageas said its Chinese joint venture company had no direct exposure to Evergrande but around 2% of the corporate bond portfolio was invested in highly-rated Chinese real estate debt.

“Only further widespread spillover to the general stock markets would have an impact on our results,” an Ageas spokesperson said.

Prudential Chief Executive Mike Wells told CNBC this week that the insurer’s exposure to Evergrande was “de minimis”, and that less than 5% of the insurer’s bond holdings were in Chinese real estate.

Prudential also has a joint venture in China.

Swiss Re did not have direct investments in Chinese property in its real estate portfolio, a spokesperson said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

European banks book 20 billion euros, or 14% of their profits, in tax havens annually, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Europe’s biggest banks are booking an average of 20 billion euros ($23.7 billion) in tax havens every year, which is about 14% of their profits, according to a report by report from the EU Tax Observatory.

The report looked into the activities of 36 systemic European banks, headquartered in 11 countries across Europe, that have been subject to mandatory country-by-country reporting on their actions since 2015.

The tax havens looked into include Bahamas, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Ireland, Isle of Man, Jersey, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Macao, Malta, Mauritius, Panama and Qatar.

About 25% of the banks’ profits were booked in countries where the effective tax rate was lower than 15%.

“Bank profitability in tax havens is abnormally high: 238,000 euros per employee, as opposed to around 65,000 euros in non-haven countries,” the authors added. “This suggests that the profits booked in tax havens are primarily shifted out of other countries where service production occurs.”

The profits

HSBC booked a mean 58% of its pre-tax profits in tax havens between 2014 and 2020, according to the study, making it the lender funneling the largest percentage of profits into the EUTO’s list of tax havens.

Standard Chartered booked an average of around a third of its pre-tax profits in tax havens, according to the report, while Deutsche Bank, Nord LB and RBS all booked, on average, more than 20% of their pre-tax profits in tax havens between 2014 and 2020.

Bankia BFA, Erste, Nykredit Realkredit, Swedbank and Banco Sabadell booked none of their profits in tax havens during the seven-year sample period.

Curbs needed

Taxes have become a sensitive issue, with cash-strapped governments plugging holes in the economy due to COVID seeking to agree on a common rate for taxing Big Tech, in particular.

Country-by-country reporting to shed light on the inner workings of banks has failed to change behaviour despite the rise of tax issues on the public agenda, the report said.

“More ambitious initiatives — such as a global minimum tax with a 25% rate — may be necessary to curb the use of tax havens by the banking sector.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Buying Citi assets can be a game-changer for Kotak, IndusInd faces constraints, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The retail and credit card business put on the block by Citibank India are best fit for Kotak Mahindra Bank and DBS Bank, while for HDFC Bank it is still a good asset though not a game-changer, according to CLSA.

The brokerage house had estimated the value of Citi‘s business in India at $2-2.5 billion.

HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, IndusInd Bank and DBS Bank have emerged as the top five contenders to take over Citi India’s retail business that includes, credit cards, mortgages, wealth management and deposits. The race will be narrowed down to three, with whom Citi would negotiate a higher value.

How they stack up

While IndusInd Bank has the size and valuation constraints to acquire such an asset, the operations can be a game changer for Kotak Mahindra Bank because it can add 20% to the bank’s current retail loans, it said. “For Kotak Bank, the business adds 20% to its current retail book and increases its card segment by 3x (times),” the brokerage said in a note. “It is also complementary to its affluent customer base and Kotak Bank’s premium valuation will aid it in a purchase.”

It said Citibank’s affluent retail business also fits well with DBS Bank India’s premium offerings and banking relationships. DBS Bank does not have a credit card business in India.

For HDFC Bank, the acquisition won’t be a game changer as it is only nearly 6% of the lender’s total book, it said, while for Axis it will be a valuable acquisition, but valuations would be constrained, it said.

What’s on offer?
Citi’s total assets In India at the end of FY20, including credit extended to Indian institutional clients from offshore Citi entities, stood at Rs 2.99 crore.

The consumer banking business, which includes cards and loans against property, would be around Rs 32,000 crore. It also has a huge amount of savings accounts built over the last few years, which has a lucrative liability book and also credit cards, in which it was the largest among foreign banks in India.

The bank also had Rs 27,911 crore of loans to agriculture, affordable housing renewable energy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Of this, Rs 4,975 crore was to weaker sections, as part of Citi India’s priority sector lending obligations, results released last year showed.

Citi Bank has 2.8 million retail customers, 1.2 million bank accounts and nearly 2.6 million credit cards as of June.

Citi’s consumer business contributes about a third to the overall India business in terms of profitability, while total India business contributes 1.5% of profits to the global book. Overall, Citibank’s India unit had a market share of advances and deposits of 0.6% and 1.1%, respectively.

Citi credit cards
Buying Citi assets can be a game-changer for Kotak, IndusInd faces constraints

Citi started retail operations in India in 1985 and was among the pioneers of credit cards in the country. However, its share of credit cards has dropped from 13% to 6% now. Despite being the sixth-largest player in the space, Citi has the highest average spend on its card touching close to 2 lakh per card. The average spends per card for Citi is 1.4 times higher than the industry average, making it a profitable business for the bank in India. The other four major players have had nearly the same steady growth in spend per card at 11-12%.

Citibank’s outstanding credit cards as of February stood at 2.65 million, the largest among foreign banks in India, ahead of 1.46 million by Standard Chartered and 1.56 million by Amex. Citi India had 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts as of March 2020.

At the end of March 2020, Citibank served 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts and 2.2 million credit card accounts.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Top global banks crash crypto party, invest heavily in blockchain, currency firms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Despite being very vocal about how bad Bitcoin supposedly is, top global can’t ignore the potential revenue streams and importance of having a strong strategic position in the crypto economy.

Most major banks including Standard Chartered, Barclays, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs are investing in crypto and blockchain-related companies in 2021.

Out of the top 100 banks by assets under management, 55 have invested in cryptocurrency and/or blockchain-related companies. Either directly, or through subsidiaries, according to Block Data.

The most active investors based on the number of investments in blockchain companies are Barclays (19), Citigroup (9), Goldman Sachs (8), J.P. Morgan Chase (7) and BNP Paribas (6).

The investors active in the biggest funding rounds are Standard Chartered ($380 million in 6 rounds), BNY Mellon ($320.69 million in 5 rounds), Citigroup ($279.49 million in 9 rounds), UBS Group ($266.2 million in five rounds) and BNP Paribas ($236.05 million in 9 rounds).

Where are they investing?

About 23 of the top 100 banks by assets under management are building custody solutions, or investing in the companies that provide them.

Custodians offer financial services to look after their clients’ funds, for a fee. They either build their own technology to offer this service, or use a technology provider whose solutions they can integrate into their own systems.

Why are banks investing in cryptos

Seeing cryptocurrency exchanges with a fraction of their staff become substantially more profitable or valuable than many banks. This started as early as 2018, when Binance, the leading exchange at the time, recorded $54 million more profit than Deutsche Bank, with just 200 vs 100,000 employees. More recently, Coinbase’s valuation was higher than Goldman Sachs, with just 4% of their employees.

Countless requests from their clients to provide Bitcoin solutions along with a change in regulations in 2020 that allows banks to offer crypto custody solutions is also among the reasons for banks to turn to cryptos.

The investments

Standard Chartered has invested $380 million via 6 rounds in firms including blockchain network Ripple, whose XRP token has a capitalisation of around $48 billion. It’s also an investor in Cobalt, a trading technology provider based in the UK. BNY has put money in Fireblocks, whose platform allows financial institutions to issue, move and store cryptocurrencies.

Citibank has invested $279 million in 9 rounds. It has put money in SETL, whose ledger technology is used to move cash and other assets.

UBS, with $266 million and 2 rounds, is an investor in Axoni, whose technology is used to modernize infrastructure in capital markets.

BNP Paribas has invested $236 million in 9 rounds and was developing real-time trade and settlement applications using smart contracts based on the DAML programming language with Digital Asset.

Morgan Stanley with $234 million with 3 investments has invested in NYDIG, a crypto custody firm and the bitcoin subsidiary of Stone Ridge, a $10 billion alternative asset manager.

JP Morgan Chase has bet $206 million via seven rounds and has investments in ConsenSys, an ethereum software company.

Goldman Sachs has put $204 million through eight investments, and its investee firms include Coin Metrics, a provider of blockchain data to institutional clients.

MUFG has put $185 million in six investment rounds in firms including Coinbase, the US cryptocurrency exchange that went public in April, and in Bitflyer, a Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange.

ING has bet $170 million spread across 6 investments and has backed HQLAx, a blockchain liquidity management platform.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Citibank granted IFSCA licence to set up banking unit at GIFT City, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


GIC had set up its international operations in Dubai in 2007 and had been providing reinsurance to the African continent.

Ahmedabad: US-headquartered Citibank NA has received the regulatory approval to open a banking unit at India’s only International Financial Services Centre at Gandhinagar, to carry out offshore transactions, said sources privy to the development.

This has paved the way for the first US bank to set up a branch at the Gujarat Finance Tec-City (GIFT City). “We issued a licence to Citibank on Monday to set up its IFSC banking unit at GIFT,” confirmed Dipesh Shah, development head, International Financial Services Centres Authority, the unified regulator for development and regulation of financial products, financial services and financial institutions at IFSCs.

Citibank will service both Indian and global customers from its IFSC branch. The new IFSC unit aims to undertake credit business such as execution of foreign currency loans and external commercial borrowings, working capital loans including trade finance facilities, payment/remittance as well as treasury business including borrowing and deposits, said sources.

Last year, Citibank received in-principle nod from the Reserve Bank of India for the banking unit after which it was awaiting the final nod from IFSCA to start operations.

Recently, Deutsche Bank, a global bank with presence in over 70 countries, became the first German bank to set up its IFSC banking unit at GIFT IFSC. “Global banks are finding the IFSC a great strategic opportunity to serve international clients at a very competitive cost. The IFSC is fast emerging as the preferred gateway for international financial services and is enabling many new business opportunities for global investors,” said Shah.

Leading Indian and foreign banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered, Barclays, State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, ICICI Bank, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and HDFC, among others are already operating from GIFT IFSC.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Five lenders jostle to grab Citi’s India premium retail business, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The race for Citi Bank’s India retail business is set to get fierce as the five lenders in the race have either growth ambitions or gaps to fill.

HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, IndusInd Bank and DBS Bank have emerged as the top five contenders to take over Citi India’s estimated $2-billion retail business that includes, credit cards, mortgages, wealth management and

deposits. The race will be narrowed down to three, with whom Citi would negotiate a higher value.

The bidders will look to pre-empt competition by denying rivals an opportunity to grab a bigger pie of the market.

The suitors

DBS Bank is considered one of the potential buyers of these businesses given its deep pockets and ambitions to expand in India. In November last year, the Singaporean lender completed the first of its kind RBI directed acquisition of a distressed lender taking control of Chennai based Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB).

DBS India has already infused more than $1 billion into India in its relatively new existence in the country and though LVB gives its wider access to South India, it may look at Citi’s credit card portfolio to kick start that business in India. DBS does not offer credit cards in the country currently.

Kotak Mahindra Bank, which was said to be exploring an acquisition of IndusInd Bank and refused the offer for Yes Bank, may be finally looking to lay its hands on the big business on offer.

HDFC Bank, which is facing a ban from the Reserve Bank of India for onboarding new customers, and facing stiff competition from ICICI Bank stands to gain some of the lost opportunity with the Citi business buy.

What’s on offer?

Citi’s total assets In India at the end of FY20, including credit extended to Indian institutional clients from offshore Citi entities, stood at Rs 2.99 crore.

The consumer banking business, which includes cards and loans against property, would be around Rs 32,000 crore. It also has a huge amount of savings accounts built over the last few years, which has a lucrative liability book and also credit cards, in which it was the largest among foreign banks in India.

The bank also had Rs 27,911 crore of loans to agriculture, affordable housing renewable energy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Of this, Rs 4,975 crore was to weaker sections, as part of Citi India’s priority sector lending obligations, results released last year showed.

Citi Bank has 2.8 million retail customers, 1.2 million bank accounts and nearly 2.6 million credit cards as of June.

Citi’s consumer business contributes about a third to the overall India business in terms of profitability, while total India business contributes 1.5% of profits to the global book. Overall, Citibank’s India unit had a market share of advances and deposits of 0.6% and 1.1%, respectively.

Citi credit cards

Citi started retail operations in India in 1985 and was among the pioneers of credit cards in the country. However, its share of credit cards has dropped from 13% to 6% now. Despite being the sixth-largest player in the space, Citi has the highest average spend on its card touching close to 2 lakh per card. The average spends per card for Citi is 1.4 times higher than the industry average, making it a profitable business for the bank in India. The other four major players have had nearly the same steady growth in spend per card at 11-12%.

Citibank’s outstanding credit cards as of February stood at 2.65 million, the largest among foreign banks in India, ahead of 1.46 million by Standard Chartered and 1.56 million by Amex. Citi India had 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts as of March 2020.

At the end of March 2020, Citibank served 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts and 2.2 million credit card accounts.

The market

The total number of cards in circulation in India, as per a Worldline India Digital Payment report for 2020, stood at 946.81 million as of December 2020. As of December 2020, the average ticket size of credit cards was Rs 3,653, while that of debit cards was Rs 2,568, Worldline said. However, according to a 2019 report, despite being the fifth-largest player in the space, Citi has highest average spend on its card touching close to 2 lakh per card. The Indian credit card market is a fairly crowded place with 74 players operating. The top 5 players, however, have a comfortable 78% share by the number of cards and 75% share by credit card spend. HDFC bank is the leader at close to 31% share followed by SBI cards at 19%, which is trailed by ICICI, Axis, and Citi.

Earlier acquisitions

Local lenders have profited from foreign banks’ exit from India over the last decade. IndusInd Bank for example brought and built up Deutsche Bank’s credit card portfolio in 2011 and followed it up by buying Royal Bank of Scotland’s (RBS) diamond financing business in 2015. Another private sector RBL Bank also started its credit card business by purchasing the portfolio from RBS in 2013.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HSBC to StanChart predict demise of business travel for bankers

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Jetting off at a moment’s notice to visit clients was second nature for many investment bankers before the pandemic struck. After more than a year of lockdowns and remote working, plenty of executives are now saying the days of regular globe trotting are gone for good.

There “will definitely be much less travelling,” Nordea Bank Apb Chief Executive Officer Frank Vang-Jensen said Thursday, while Standard Chartered Plc’s finance boss Andy Halford told Bloomberg Television he expects travel costs to reduce sharply: “We see a step change down in the level of travel once we normalise out of this.”

Earlier this week, HSBC Holdings Plc Chief Financial Officer Ewen Stevenson said his bank was budgeting for travel costs to fall by half, with greater reliance on “video technology and having people go on fewer, longer trips when they do travel.”

The changes — once unthinkable — are the latest adjustments to office life staples now the pandemic has proved the case for remote working. Banks are shrinking their real estate footprints as outfits including Deutsche Bank AG and UBS Group AG say they are open to making flexible working the norm, although some Wall Street firms have been more skeptical of the shift. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO David Solomon has said work-from-home is an “aberration.”

Cutting back on flights could mean big savings, as well as environmental kudos.

HSBC has said travel costs were down $300 million in 2020, suggesting an annual saving of $150 million going forward if behavioral changes stick. JPMorgan Chase & Co. spent about $800 million on global travel and expenses in 2019, according to a Business Travel News ranking.

A fall in that revenue spells trouble for airlines, which count business passengers as their most lucrative market. The route between London’s Heathrow and New York’s JFK airports generated about $1.2 billion in revenue for British Airways alone in the year through March 2019, according to estimates by data company OAG.

Still, Airbus SE CEO Guillaume Faury said on Thursday in a Bloomberg TV interview that he expects business travel to come back eventually, though it will lag behind the recovery for other parts of the market such as leisure and family trips.

Some bankers agree. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said in November he doesn’t think business travel will slip as much as expected because firms may see a competitive advantage in visiting clients in person.

“If I’m the gung-ho person, I want to get the business, taking that trip may be much different than saying I’ll meet you in a Zoom,” Dimon said. “I think people like me will travel as much and Zoom more.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Citi Credit Card business can be a lucrative package, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Citi will shut its India retail banking business, which includes credit cards, savings bank accounts and personal loans, as part of a global decision to exit 13 markets as the US-based lender focuses on a few wealthy regions around the world.

However, the most lucrative is the bank’s credit card business, which may draw multiple bidders, according to experts.

“Private Banks and credit card companies like SBI Cards can be key beneficiaries of market share gains in the credit card segment. Some smaller private banks might be interested buyers of India portfolio as they are looking to scale-up in the segment. Foreign banks might also look to expand their presence,” a Jefferies note said.

DBS India, which want to expand in India, may be among the aggressive bidders for Citi’s credit card portfolio.

Citi credit cards

Citi started retail operations in India in 1985 and was among the pioneers of credit cards in the country. However, its share of credit cards has dropped from 13% to 6% now. Despite being the fifth-largest player in the space, Citi has the highest average spend on its card touching close to 2 lakh per card. The average spends per card for Citi is 1.4 times higher than the industry average, making it a profitable business for the bank in India. The other four major players have had nearly the same steady growth in spend per card at 11-12%.

Citibank‘s outstanding credit cards as of February stood at 2.65 million, the largest among foreign banks in India, ahead of 1.46 million by Standard Chartered and 1.56 million by Amex. Citi India had 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts as of March 2020.

At the end of March 2020, Citibank served 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts and 2.2 million credit card accounts.

The market

The total number of cards in circulation in India, as per a Worldline India Digital Payment report for 2020, stood at 946.81 million as of December 2020. As of December 2020, the average ticket size of credit cards was Rs 3,653, while that of debit cards was Rs 2,568, Worldline said. However, according to a 2019 report, despite being the fifth-largest player in the space, Citi boosts the highest average

spend on its card touching close to 2 lakh per card. The Indian credit card market is a fairly crowded place with 74 players operating. The top 5 players, however, have a comfortable 78% share by the number of cards and 75% share by credit card spend. HDFC bank is the leader at close to 31% share followed by SBI cards at 19%, which is trailed by ICICI, Axis, and Citi.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2