Private banks cut more rates than PSBs as overall rate transmission improves, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Rate transmission, the pet peeve of the Reserve Bank of India has improved substantially following the introduction of external benchmarks with the private banks sniping more than public sector peers.

The overall lending rates have fallen as much as 100 basis points, with the weighted average lending rates for outstanding rupee loans of commercial banks fell 96 basis points between March 2020 and October 21, according to RBI data.

But these rates have fallen more sharply for private sector banks at 109 basis points compared to 85 bps dip for public sector banks and 187 bps for the foreign banks in the country.

The central bank has however cut its benchmark repo rate much higher by 115 bps during the period, and also introduced a number of measures to enhance liquidity of banks to deal with the pandemic induced crisis.

Policy transmission

Policy transmission has been at a much faster pace since the pandemic. In the 19-month period prior to the onset of the pandemic, the benchmark policy 135 bps. But the banks lowered their lending rates only by 15 basis points between March 2019 and March 2020.

A research paper by the Reserve Bank of India economist notes that the transmission of policy repo rate changes to deposit and lending rates of commercial banks (SCBs) has improved since the introduction of external benchmark-based pricing of loans.

The paper said that the transmission showed further improvement since March 2020 on account of sizeable policy rate cuts, and persisting surplus liquidity conditions resulting from various system level as well as targeted measures introduced by the Reserve Bank – cut in the cash reserve ratio (CRR)

requirements, long-term repo operations (LTROs), TLTROs, refinancing window for All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs), sector/segment specific liquidity measures (Mutual Funds, Small Finance Banks, Micro Finance Institutions/Non-Bank Financial Companies), special open market operations and regular OMOs.

External benchmarks

The share of external benchmark-linked loans in total outstanding floating rate loans increased from 2.4 per cent in September 2019 to 32 per cent in June 2021, contributing to a faster and fuller transmission.

There has been a concomitant fall in the share of MCLR-linked loans from 83.6 per cent to 60.2 per cent, over the same period, although these still have the largest share in outstanding floating rate loans.

As lending rates under the external benchmark regime undergo automatic adjustments with the changes in the benchmark rate, banks are incentivised to adjust their term as well as saving deposit rates to cushion their net interest margins and profitability, which then hastens the adjustment in banks’ marginal cost of funds, and MCLRs.

Earlier hurdles

While the Reserve Bank has periodically refined the process of interest rate setting by banks, transmission has hitherto been sluggish as banks relied on their own cost of funds, which is internal benchmarks.

“The systems were also characterised by opacity, especially regarding the interest rate resetting practices for existing borrowers,” the central bank said.

To address these rigidities, the RBI had decided to move to an external benchmark system – an interest rate outside the control of a bank and not necessarily linked to its internal costs – for select categories of loans (viz., all new floating rate personal or retail loans and floating rate loans to micro and small enterprises (MSEs) to the policy repo rate or 3-month or 6-month T-bill rate or other specified benchmarks effective October 1, 2019, and for medium enterprises effective April 1, 2020).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Private sector banks lower lending rates more than PSU Banks during the pandemic, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private sector banks have been leading the way in reducing cost of funds in the past year of pandemic even as state-run banks are not far behind. While the overall lending rates have fallen as much as 100 basis points, for private banks it has been more.

Weighted average lending rates for outstanding rupee loans of commercial banks fell 96 basis points- bps (one basis point is 0.01 per cent) between March 2020 and October 21, data released by the RBI indicates.

But these rates have fallen more sharply for private sector banks at 109 basis points compared to 85 bps dip for public sector banks and 187 bps for the foreign banks in the country.

The central bank has however lowered its benchmark repo rate much higher by 115 bps during the period and also introduced a number of measures to enhance liquidity of banks to deal with the pandemic induced crisis.

Policy transmission has been much faster pace since the pandemic. In the 19 month period prior to the onset of the pandemic, the benchmark policy 135 bps. But the banks lowered their lending rates only by 15 basis points between March 2019 and March 20 as reflected in the weighted average lending rates on outstanding loans of commercial banks.

A research paper by the Reserve Bank of India economist notes that the transmission of policy repo rate changes to deposit and lending rates of commercial banks (SCBs) has improved since the introduction of external benchmark-based pricing of loans.

The paper also adds that the transmission showed further improvement since March 2020 on account of sizeable policy rate cuts, and persisting surplus liquidity conditions resulting from various system level as well as targeted measures introduced by the Reserve Bank – cut in the cash reserve ratio (CRR) requirements, long-term repo operations (LTROs), TLTROs, refinancing window for All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs), sector/segment specific liquidity measures (Mutual Funds, Small Finance Banks, Micro Finance Institutions/Non-Bank Financial Companies), special open market operations and regular OMOs.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Emkay Global, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The recent Reserve Bank of India clarification on banks’ promoter holdings is likely to benefit IndusInd Bank, if the central bank does not have any issues related to the promoters, Emkay Global said in a report.

In IndusInd Bank, the Hinduja brothers hold a 16.5 percent stake. The increase in promoter stake will boost the bank’s financial strength, and their clients will be protected.

The RBI had recently clarified that the promoters who have recently reduced their holdings to below 26% and want to increase it back, can approach the central bank. The promoter will have a choice to bring down the promoter holding to below 26% after the initial locking period is over.

The RBI retained the norm to maintain a minimum (floor) of 40% of paid-up voting equity share capital by the promoter for the first five years, but there is no cap on the promoters’ holdings in the initial five years, Emkay highlighted. That said, the cap on the promoter’s stake over 15 years has been raised from 15% to 26%, which was implemented in the case of Kotak Mahindra Bank.

Non-promoter shareholding will be capped at 10% of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank for natural persons and non-financial institutions and at 15% for all categories of financial institutions, supranational institutions, public sector undertaking or government. If this is allowed, then possibly HDFC may not had to bring its stake in Bandhan to 10%, Emkay said.

In the case of invoking pledged shares of a bank, the pledgee’s voting rights will be restricted to 5% till the time the pledgee obtains permission from the RBI for the regularisation of the acquisition of these shares.

The RBI has retained non-operative financial holding company (NOFHC) as the preferred structure for all new licences to be issued for universal b anks, but it will be mandatory only in cases where the individual promoters, promoting entities or converting entities have other group entities, the report said. However, banks currently under NOFHC, such as IDFC First Bank and Bandhan Bank, may be allowed to exit such a structure if they do not have any other group entities in their fold.

The RBI has given in-principle approval to IDFC First Bank-Bandhan Bank, but IDFC will have to first divest stake in its MF/tech businesses for a reverse merger with IDFC First Bank, while Bandhan Bank is not keen on diluting the structure as of now, the report said.

Furthermore, on the relaxation of the listing norms for future small finance banks (SFBs), existing SFBs in queue, including Utkarsh, Fincare, Jana, ESAF, and even the recently-formed Unity SFB, may not get any relief. However, Unity SFB, which is a venture between BharatPe and Centrum, could have different terms, given the potential acquisition of beleaguered PMC Bank.

Small finance banks can now list within eight years from the date of commencement of operations against the earlier condition of within three years of reaching a net worth of Rs 5 billion, and against the demand for 10 years. For universal banks, the listing requirement remains the same, that is after six years of commencement of operations.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Small finance banks, microlenders stay away from IPO party, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Kolkata: While Nykaa, Paytm and Policybazaar are the toast of the primary equity market now, lenders to the bottom of the pyramid which had earlier lured investors for their capacity to earn high margins remain laggards.

Half-a-dozen entities in the small finance bank and microfinance space that have received approval for raising funds through initial public offerings appear to be going slow because of valuation issues, people familiar with the matter said.

Among small finance banks, ESAF, Jana, Fincare and Utkarsh are said to be weighing investor interest for their proposed IPOs. Utkarsh Small Finance Bank received Securities & Exchange Board of India’s approval for IPO in June, Jana SFB got it in July and Fincare in August. ESAF Small Finance Bank received the regulator’s approval in October for the second time, after the one-year validity on the first lapsed in March.

Microfinance firm Arohan Financial Services received Sebi approval in April but has yet to hit the market. Northern Arc Capital, a non-bank lender with exposure to the financial inclusion space, got the approval in September.

“Many Lenders including those in the microfinance industry are not getting the kind of investor interest or valuation seen for primary issues of fintech firms,” said Donald D’Souza, managing director & co-head (investment banking) at Equirus.

“Some of these firms have done a few roadshows but have failed to attract investors at higher valuation. That’s the reason why some of these lenders are not seen in the IPO market despite the bull run. Even some small finance banks, which need to be listed within a specified time frame to meet regulations, are yet to be seen in this space,” D’Souza said.

Investors are apparently exercising caution as micro lenders are saddled with concerns over asset quality, high credit cost and squeezed margin following the pandemic-led stress on their borrowers.

The portfolio at risk for 30 days (PAR30+) for the microfinance sector remained high at 10.18% at the end of September, even after showing a sharp improvement from 16.56% three months earlier.

“The new-age companies are mostly making merry in the season of IPOs since investors are ready to pay huge premiums for new business models and fresh ideas. The party is on at least till Christmas. The valuations however are relatively muted for lending companies as investors are comparing them with the existing secondary market prices in the same segment,” said Dinesh Arora, partner and leader (deals) at PwC India.

As many as 52 companies have mobilised Rs 1.08 lakh crore from primary issuances in 2021 so far compared with Rs 26,600 crore raised by 15 companies last year. Foreign portfolio investors are said to have invested more than Rs 46,000 crore in IPOs this year.

Microfinance association Sa-Dhan said the average collection efficiency has increased to more than 95% in the quarter through September from 85% in the preceding quarter, even as 13 states and union territories including Chhattisgarh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal have their PAR30+ value higher than the industry average.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Small finance banks, microlenders stay away from IPO party, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Kolkata: While Nykaa, Paytm and Policybazaar are the toast of the primary equity market now, lenders to the bottom of the pyramid which had earlier lured investors for their capacity to earn high margins remain laggards.

Half-a-dozen entities in the small finance bank and microfinance space that have received approval for raising funds through initial public offerings appear to be going slow because of valuation issues, people familiar with the matter said.

Among small finance banks, ESAF, Jana, Fincare and Utkarsh are said to be weighing investor interest for their proposed IPOs. Utkarsh Small Finance Bank received Securities & Exchange Board of India’s approval for IPO in June, Jana SFB got it in July and Fincare in August. ESAF Small Finance Bank received the regulator’s approval in October for the second time, after the one-year validity on the first lapsed in March.

Microfinance firm Arohan Financial Services received Sebi approval in April but has yet to hit the market. Northern Arc Capital, a non-bank lender with exposure to the financial inclusion space, got the approval in September.

“Many Lenders including those in the microfinance industry are not getting the kind of investor interest or valuation seen for primary issues of fintech firms,” said Donald D’Souza, managing director & co-head (investment banking) at Equirus.

“Some of these firms have done a few roadshows but have failed to attract investors at higher valuation. That’s the reason why some of these lenders are not seen in the IPO market despite the bull run. Even some small finance banks, which need to be listed within a specified time frame to meet regulations, are yet to be seen in this space,” D’Souza said.

Investors are apparently exercising caution as micro lenders are saddled with concerns over asset quality, high credit cost and squeezed margin following the pandemic-led stress on their borrowers.

The portfolio at risk for 30 days (PAR30+) for the microfinance sector remained high at 10.18% at the end of September, even after showing a sharp improvement from 16.56% three months earlier.

“The new-age companies are mostly making merry in the season of IPOs since investors are ready to pay huge premiums for new business models and fresh ideas. The party is on at least till Christmas. The valuations however are relatively muted for lending companies as investors are comparing them with the existing secondary market prices in the same segment,” said Dinesh Arora, partner and leader (deals) at PwC India.

As many as 52 companies have mobilised Rs 1.08 lakh crore from primary issuances in 2021 so far compared with Rs 26,600 crore raised by 15 companies last year. Foreign portfolio investors are said to have invested more than Rs 46,000 crore in IPOs this year.

Microfinance association Sa-Dhan said the average collection efficiency has increased to more than 95% in the quarter through September from 85% in the preceding quarter, even as 13 states and union territories including Chhattisgarh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal have their PAR30+ value higher than the industry average.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SFBs report fall in Q2 PAT as asset quality worsens

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


AU Small Finance Bank said its average collection efficiency in Q2FY22 stood at 109%, at pre-Covid levels.

By Piyush Shukla

Small finance banks (SFBs) reported a 13-60% year-on-year decline in their net profit for the July-September (Q2FY22) quarter owing to deterioration in the asset quality.

AU Small Finance Bank, which had gross advances of Rs 36,405 crore as on September end, reported a net profit of Rs 279 crore, lower 13% than the previous year. The lender’s gross non-performing asset ratio (GNPA) stood at 3.16%, higher than 1.54% a year ago. In absolute terms, gross bad loans rose to Rs 1,151 crore, compared with Rs 423 crore from a year ago.

Equitas SFB reported a 60% year-on-year plunge in its net profit for Q2 at Rs 41 crore due to deteriorating asset quality and subsequent higher provisions. The lender’s GNPA ratio rose 234 basis points on year to 4.82%. Net NPA ratio was higher at 2.46%, against 1.13% a year ago. Due to higher bad loans, total provisions other than tax and contingencies rose to Rs 137.81 crore, higher by 84.4%.

Equitas said its July-September bottomline was affected on account of higher provisions for restructured assets. The bank carries Rs 196-crore provisions towards restructured loan book of Rs 1,401 crore.

Ujjivan Small Finance Bank reported a net loss of Rs 274 crore in the reporting quarter on account of higher provisions. It had reported a net profit of Rs 96 crore a year ago. As on September 30, Ujjivan’s GNPA ratio stood at 11.80%, sharply higher than 0.98% a year ago and 9.79% as on June end. “We have done major restructuring and taken accelerated credit provisions during the quarter. We believe, subject to potential third wave of Covid, our GNPA has peaked and will gradually reduce hereon,” said Martin PS, officer on special duty, in a post-earnings release.

Suryoday SFB reported a net loss of Rs 1.9 crore owing to higher provisions. The lender’s gross bad loan ratio rose 796 basis points on year to 10.21%. Subsequently, its provisions rose over six folds to Rs 97.3 crore.

Asset quality outlook

Even as SFBs reported deteriorating asset quality in Q2, trends in collections show that the same may improve in the second half of current financial year. AU Small Finance Bank said its average collection efficiency in Q2FY22 stood at 109%, at pre-Covid levels.

“While the overall GNPA remained steady compared to the first quarter, there was improved collection efficiency, leading to reduction in overdue cases between 1 and 90 days. And with X-bucket collection efficiency coming back to the pre-Covid level, we expect to reach steady state operating level shortly,” said PN Vasudevan, MD and CEO at Equitas Small Finance Bank, in a post-earnings release.

In a recent conversation with FE, Carol Furtado, chief operating officer at Ujjivan SFB, said, “Collections have picked up well. We are focused on reducing the PAR (portfolio at risk) flow to higher buckets, collections from restructured and NPA pool, further increasing overall collections. With this context, we believe things in H2 (Oct-March) would be better on the credit quality front.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI issues revised operational guidelines on on-tap SLTRO scheme for SFBs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Monday issued revised operational guidelines on the special long-term repo operations (SLTRO) scheme for small finance banks (SFBs). In the monetary policy announced last week, the RBI had extended the on-tap SLTRO for SFBs till December 31, 2021. This facility was earlier made available till October 31, 2021.

The RBI in a statement on Monday said all SFBs eligible under the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) can participate in the scheme.

“There is no tenure restriction regarding lending by SFBs under the scheme. However, the SFBs will have to ensure that the amount borrowed from the RBI should at all times be backed by lending to the specified segments till maturity of the SLTRO,” the statement said.

Furthermore, SFBs should endeavour to lend within a reasonable period, i.e., not later than 30 days from the date of availing the funds from the RBI.

“The scheme will now be operationalised on tap,” RBI said.

Accordingly, the last tranche of the SLTRO auction due on October 14, 2021, announced on May 7, 2021, will not be conducted, it said.

SFBs can place requests for funds through e-mail and the RBI will aggregate all such requests received and release funds every Monday (on the subsequent working day if Monday is a holiday) by initiating a three-year repo contract at repo rate with the requesting bank, the statement said.

Requests from the SFBs desirous of availing funds from the RBI will be subject to the availability of funds as on the date of application. The funds cannot be guaranteed in case the total amount of Rs 10,000 crore is already availed, the statement said.

In case the requested amount exceeds the remaining amount under the scheme on the date of operation, the remaining amount will be distributed on a pro-rata basis among all the eligible requests.

The RBI reserves the right to decide the quantum of allotment and/ or accept/ reject any or all the requests, either wholly/ partially, without assigning any reason thereof.

The eligible collateral and margin requirements will remain the same as applicable for LAF operations.

The amount utilised under the scheme will be informed to market participants in the money market operations (MMO), RBI said. PTI HV HRS hrs



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

MFIN, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The microfinance industry’s gross loan portfolio (GLP) rose 4.2 per cent to Rs 2,37,369 crore as of June 30, 2021, compared with Rs 2,27,727 crore as of June 30, 2020, according to a report by Microfinance Institutions Network (MFIN). Microfinance loan disbursals during the first quarter of the financial year 2021-22 improved significantly to Rs 25,503 crore, compared with Rs 6,186 crore in the corresponding quarter last year.

MFIN is an industry association comprising 58 NBFC-MFIs and 39 associates including banks, small finance banks (SFBs) and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).

It released the Micrometer report for the April-June 2021 quarter on Tuesday.

The report showed that 13 banks hold the largest share of the portfolio in micro-credit with a total loan outstanding of Rs 1,02,405 crore, which is 43.14 per cent of the total micro-credit universe.

NBFC-MFIs are the second-largest provider of micro-credit with a loan amount outstanding of Rs 75,021 crore, accounting for 31.61 per cent of the total industry portfolio.

SFBs have a total loan amount outstanding of Rs 38,624 crore with a total share of 16.27 per cent. NBFCs account for another 7.89 per cent, and other MFIs account for 1.09 per cent of the universe, it said.

As of June 30, 2021, the microfinance industry served 5.68 crore unique borrowers, through 10.30 crore loan accounts, the report showed.

The microfinance active loan accounts decreased by 0.67 per cent during the past 12 months to 10.30 crore as of June 30, 2021, it said.

The report said the gross loan portfolio (GLP) of NBFC-MFIs stood at Rs 76,237 crore as of June 30, 2021, a 6.9 per cent year-on-year rise as compared to Rs 71,301 crore as of June 30, 2020.

Loan amount of Rs 6,511 crore was disbursed in Q1 FY 2021-22 by NBFC-MFIs through 17.97 lakh accounts, compared with Rs 561 crore disbursed in Q1 FY 2020-21 through 1.99 lakh accounts.

NBFC-MFIs received a total of Rs 3,596 crore in debt funding during the April-June quarter of this fiscal, which is 39.6 per cent lower than that in the year-ago period.

Total equity of the NBFC-MFIs grew 11.9 per cent year-on-year to Rs 18,660 crore as of June 30, 2021. PTI HV HRS hrs



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Top bankers may only get bonus after new RBI rule, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India‘s directive to treat grant of employee stock options as an expense is having an unintended impact.

Banks are doing away with ESOPs and adding deferred bonus payments to the senior managerial staff as the new rules could add significant costs to banks, eroding their quarterly earnings.

The shares are required to be valued at a fair value that may add to the costs. Though it is a non-cash cost, it still results in a higher expense in the P&L for the bank, impacting its profits and earnings.

The RBI directive

The RBI said last week the fair value of the share-linked incentives paid to chief executive officers, whole-time directors and other key functionaries by the private banks should be recognised as an expense during the relevant accounting period.

Issuing a clarification in this regard, the RBI said, “the fair value (of share-linked incentives) …should be recognised as expense beginning with the accounting period for which approval has been granted”.

In terms of the extant guidelines, share-linked instruments are required to be fairly valued on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model.

The Black-Scholes model, also known as the Black-Scholes-Merton model, is a mathematical model for pricing an options contract. In particular, the model estimates the variation over time of financial instruments.

Treatment as expense

The RBI issued the clarification saying “it has been observed” that banks do not recognise grants of the share-linked compensation as an expense in their books of account concurrently.

The RBI also asked all banks, including local area banks, small finance banks and foreign banks to comply with its directions for all share-linked instruments granted after the accounting period ending March 31, 2021.

The central bank had issued guidelines on the compensation of whole-time directors/ chief executive officers/ material risk takers and control function staff in November 2019 in which it had said that share-linked instruments will be included as a component of variable pay.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI discusses a host of issues with small finance banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank on Friday discussed with the heads of the small finance banks (SFBs) the stress build-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other related issues. The round-table discussion of RBI Deputy Governors M K jain and M Rajeshwar Rao with managing directors and chief exceutives of small finance banks was held through video conference.

The discussion, according to an RBI release, focused on a range of issues including evolution of the business models of SFBs; enhancing board oversight and professionalism; further improvements in assurance functions, compliance; internal control and risk management; and need to build up their IT infrastructure both for enhanced customer experience and for cyber security resilience.

“…the stress build-up due to COVID-19 and the mitigation measures for continued resilience of books of SFBs also formed part of the discussion,” it said.

Challenges and the way forward were also deliberated upon to enable the SFBs to play their role in the Indian financial intermediation space and contribute to financial inclusion, the RBI said.

The deputy governors recognised also the contribution of SFBs towards financial inclusion by extending credit and reaching out to the underserved sections of society.

“Fruitful discussion was held in which the MDs and CEOs shared their experiences and ideas on the need to work together so that stated objective is achieved for which differentiated licences were issued,” the release said.

Other senior RBI officials, including executive directors too participated in the meeting.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3