Sebi imposes Rs 10 lakh fine on Karvy Financial Services for not making open offer timely, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Markets regulator Sebi has levied a fine of Rs 10 lakh on Karvy Financial Services Ltd for delay in making public announcement to acquire shares of Regaliaa Reality Ltd.

” … by not making the mandatory public announcement within the stipulated time period the Noticee has violated the statutory requirements of law and accordingly, the Noticee has to be penalised for the same,” Sebi said.

Karvy Financial made public announcement for open offer with a delay of 81 days, in violation of Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) norms.

The probe found that Karvy had extended a loan amount of Rs 7 crore to Regaliaa whose promoters had pledged 55.56 per cent of the paid-up share capital in favour of Karvy, in addition to the securities for availing the loan.

Karvy invoked the pledge as the firm defaulted on payment of instalments. This took its shareholding in the company to 55.56 per cent, thereby breaching the threshold of 25 per cent as stipulated under SAST norms.

Sebi then directed Karvy in October 2016 to make the public announcement to acquire shares of the target company within 45 days.

However, aggrieved by the regulator’s order, Karvy filed an appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal which was dismissed in April 2018, thereby reaffirming Sebi’s decision.

Accordingly, it was required to make the public announcement within 45 days from the date of the tribunal’s order but it made the announcement only in August 2018, with a delay of 81 days.

In a separate order on Wednesday, Sebi has disposed of enforcement proceedings against the depositories — CDSL and NSDL.

The order came after Sebi carried out an inspection to ascertain whether the depositories had conformed with the share reconciliation-related responsibility.

Sebi, while disposing of the matter, noted that the case of violation of market norms against the depositories does not stand established.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finding Sustainable Coins, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


These are uncertain times for cryptocurrencies. The asset class experienced major volatility over the second week of May, with Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency in the world, losing almost 50% of its total value in the meltdown. June has been equally tumultuous for the cryptocurrency, with prices falling below the $30,000 level for the first time since the year began.

One of the reasons attributed to the spectacular fall in the price of cryptocurrencies is tech- entrepreneur Elon Musk’s decision to suspend the acceptance of Bitcoin as a form of payment at his electric vehicle and clean energy company, Tesla Inc. Musk’s decision came in the wake of concerns surrounding the environmental impact of mining Bitcoins, with the one-time enthusiast suggesting that his company will look for sustainable alternatives.

The general scepticism surrounding cryptocurrencies’ status as an unsustainable asset comes at an interesting time for India. Reports suggest that the Indian government intends to set up a panel of experts that will study the prospect of regulating cryptocurrencies, with the Reserve Bank of India recently clarifying the possibility of crypto transactions being scrutinized under extant money laundering and foreign exchange laws. Amid the speculation surrounding the enactment of an enabling regulatory framework for dealing in cryptocurrencies in India, this article will argue that such regulation must account for mechanisms that monitor their environmental impact.

Cryptocurrency is a form of digital currency that largely allows users to perform the same functions as paper money. Transactions involving cryptocurrencies are usually peer-to-peer, with details of each transaction recorded on a public ledger known as blockchain. The process of verifying and adding such transactions to the blockchain is known as mining. Simply put, mining involves solving a series of increasingly complex math problems using highly specialized equipment, to add and modify the existing ledger of transactions available to a cryptocurrency network.

Finding Sustainable Coins

The concerns shared by Musk and other sustainability scholars revolve around the energy- intensive nature of cryptocurrency mining. The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance estimates that, at 93.92 TWh, the Bitcoin network annually consumes more electricity than the countries of Kazakhstan and the Philippines. Research has also cautioned against the substantial e-waste generated in the process of mining Bitcoin, with one estimate indicating that each transaction on the Bitcoin network generates an average e-waste footprint of 134.5g. To put that in perspective – one burns through four 60W bulbs before they generate as much e-waste as a single Bitcoin transaction.

In India, the onerous ecological effects of cryptocurrency mining were first highlighted by an inter-ministerial committee report focused on developing a framework to regulate cryptocurrencies. The Report of the Committee to propose specific actions to be taken in relation to Virtual Currencies would caution against diverting resources to mine virtual currencies in India, observing that such mining may incur unfavourable economic costs. The report would further link cryptocurrency mining to the developing regulatory consensus on the mandatory storage of certain kinds of personal data in India, noting that the coupling of crypto-mining and mandatory data storage could exacerbate energy scarcity in a “power- starved” India.

Finding Sustainable Coins

The concerns highlighted by the Report merit renewed scrutiny in light of India’s perceptive policy shift on cryptocurrencies. As ideation begins on a possible framework for ‘regulating’ cryptocurrencies, regulators must look to not only mitigate the adverse environmental impact of cryptocurrencies but also understand how decision-making surrounding sustainability rendered the market for cryptocurrencies extremely vulnerable. The presence of regulatory mechanisms to monitor cryptocurrencies for environmental impact can guard against such vulnerabilities, ensuring that influential investors like Musk may not pull out of crypto- commitments citing sustainability as a reason.

In essence, effective monitoring mechanisms can prioritize long-term sustainability for cryptocurrencies and minimize disruption caused by speculation on the same.

Designing the ideal monitoring mechanism is a secondary concern. For this, regulation may commit to adapting the environmental principles outlined in the National Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct, 2018 (‘Guidelines’) to cryptocurrencies. The Guidelines embrace organizational openness – laying down a business responsibility reporting framework focused on resource use, resource minimization and adherence to extant standards on sustainability. Further, regulators may look at the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report framework issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, for guidance on operationalizing the principles contained in the Guidelines.

Finding Sustainable Coins

Admittedly, the framework may be difficult to enforce on participants that escape the scrutiny of regulators, but a sustained effort towards adapting it to cryptocurrencies at the point-of-sale may illuminate pathways for assessing their environmental impact.

The primary concern remains the creation of a regulatory framework that envisages instituting mechanisms to monitor the environmental credentials of cryptocurrencies and devises strategies to communicate such information to investors. It is hoped that greater eco- transparency will nudge players into designing greener cryptocurrencies, built on sustainable transaction-validation mechanisms and environment-friendly operating practices.

The blog has been authored by KS Roshan Menon, Research Scholar, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Top banks eye overseas AT1 bond sale as domestic investors turn wary, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As mutual funds turn wary of AT1 bonds, banks are looking overseas to raise capital through the instrument.

Five top lenders, including HDFC Bank, Axis Bank and State Bank of India, are looking to raise up to $2 billion overseas in the next few months through Additional Tier I (AT1) as they anticipate an increase in credit demand.

State Bank of India, plans to raise upto Rs 14,000 crore through additional tier-I bonds (AT1 bonds) in the current financial year (FY22) to enhance capital adequacy profile.

The Central Board approved the capital raise by way of issuance of Basel lll-compliant debt instruments in rupee and/or US dollar in FY22, the bank said last month.

Canara Bank is planning to raise up to Rs 3,400 crore in capital by issuing fresh AT1 bonds.

These bonds are expected to offer yields between 4 per cent and 5 per cent. Covering currency risks, the total cost may go up to 9 per cent.

AT1 bonds

AT1 bonds, also known as perpetual bonds, add to a bank’s capital base and allow a lender to meet fund adequacy thresholds set by regulators. Such securities do not have any fixed maturity but generally have a five-year call option, giving defined exit routes to investors. These papers are always rated one or two notches below the same issuer’s

general corporate rating. Domestic investors, including mutual funds, are wary of AT1 bonds after Yes Bank wrote off over Rs 8,000 crore of such bonds during its bailout in 2020.

State Bank of India was the only bank from the country to raise AT1 bonds overseas in 2016. Five-year call options on that series of AT1 bonds could be exercised this year.

Between FY18 and FY21, perpetual bond sales by banks have nearly halved to Rs 18,772 crore from Rs 34,860 crore three years ago. In FY22, AT1 bond sales have so far been negligible.

Sebi directive

Capital market regulator Sebi has eased the valuation rule pertaining to perpetual bonds in March last year.

The move came after the finance ministry asked the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) to withdraw its directive to mutual fund houses to treat additional tier-I (AT-1) bonds as having maturity of 100 years as it could disrupt the market and impact capital-raising by banks.

Sebi said the deemed residual maturity of Basel III AT-1 bonds will be 10 years until 31 March, 2022, and would be increased to 20 and 30 years over the subsequent six-month period.

From April 1, 2023, onwards, the residual maturity of AT-1 bonds will become 100 years from the date of issuance of the bonds.

In addition, Sebi said that deemed residual maturity of Basel III Tier 2 bonds would be considered 10 years or contractual maturity, whichever is earlier, until March 2022. After that, it will be in accordance with the contractual maturity.

AT-1 bonds are considered perpetual in nature, similar to equity shares as per the Basel III guidelines. They form part of the tier-I capital of banks.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Sebi brings in rules to make stock exchanges pay for technical glitches, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: In an unprecedented move to minimize the instances of technical glitches occurring at market infrastructure institutions like stock exchanges, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Monday released new rules that will make such institutions and their officials liable in the event of failure to provide services.

“Considering the criticality of smooth functioning of systems of MIIs, specifying a pre-defined threshold for downtime of systems of MIIs becomes desirable. For any downtime or unavailability of services, beyond such pre-defined time, there is a need to ensure that ‘Financial Disincentive’ is paid by the MIIs as well as Managing Director and Chief Technology Officer,” Sebi said in a circular issued on Monday.

Sebi’s move comes in the backdrop of the substantial failure of NSE’s systems in February when various aspects of the stock exchange’s functions failed to perform for over four hours.

“This will encourage MIIs to constantly monitor the performance and efficiency of their systems and upgrade their systems etc. to avoid any possibility of technical glitches and restart their operations expeditiously in the event of glitch,” Sebi said.

Sebi said that the new rules are being issued in the interest of investors to promoting the development of the securities market in the country, and will come into effect from August 16, 2021.

Sebi has mandated that market infrastructure institutions report technical glitches in their services within two hours of the occurrence of the event. However, if the technical glitch is declared a disaster by the MII, its reporting should be immediate.

Further, the MII must submit a preliminary report on the technical glitch within 24 hours followed by a root cause analysis and a corrective action report within 21 days. “Such report shall be submitted to Sebi, after placing the same before the Standing Committee on Technology and the Governing Board of the MII and confirming compliance with their observations,” the regulator said.

In terms of the penalties that MIIs and their officials will be required to pay in the event of a technical glitch, the market regulator has released a slab structure.

In an event where an MII fails to declare a technical glitch that affects one or many critical systems as a disaster within 30 minutes, the MII will pay 10 per cent of its average standalone net profit for past two years or Rs 2 crore, whichever is higher. Further, the managing director and the CTO will pay 10 per cent each of their annual pay for the year in which disaster occurred.

If the MII is unable to restore operations within the recovery time objective set by Sebi within 45 minutes of a disaster, the MII must pay 10 per cent of its average standalone net profit for past two years or Rs. 2 crore, whichever is higher. And, MD and CTO must pay 10 per cent each of their annual pay for the year.

The penalty structure will also apply in the event the MII fails to restore critical operations within three hours of declaring disaster. This penalty will be over and above the two penalties stated above.

Sebi said that the penalties will be paid by the MIIs and their officials to the Investor Protection Fund of the stock exchange, the core settlement guarantee fund of the clear corporation and teh Investor Protection Fund of depositories.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI issues norms on Certificate of Deposit, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday said Certificate of Deposit (CD) shall be issued in minimum denomination of Rs 5 lakh and in multiples of Rs 5 lakh thereafter.

CD is a negotiable, unsecured money market instrument issued by a bank as a usance promissory note against funds deposited with it for a maturity period up to one year.

The Master Direction on Reserve Bank of India (Certificate of Deposit) Directions, 2021 further said CDs shall be issued only in dematerialised form and held with a depository registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

“CDs may be issued to all persons resident in India,” it said, and added the tenor of the instrument at issuance should not be less than seven days.

Further, banks are not allowed to grant loans against CDs, unless specifically permitted by the Reserve Bank.

As per the RBI, issuing banks are permitted to buy back CDs before maturity, subject to certain conditions.

The central bank had issued draft directions for public comments in December 2020.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI issues norms on Certificate of Deposit, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday said Certificate of Deposit (CD) shall be issued in minimum denomination of Rs 5 lakh and in multiples of Rs 5 lakh thereafter.

CD is a negotiable, unsecured money market instrument issued by a bank as a usance promissory note against funds deposited with it for a maturity period up to one year.

The Master Direction on Reserve Bank of India (Certificate of Deposit) Directions, 2021 further said CDs shall be issued only in dematerialised form and held with a depository registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

“CDs may be issued to all persons resident in India,” it said, and added the tenor of the instrument at issuance should not be less than seven days.

Further, banks are not allowed to grant loans against CDs, unless specifically permitted by the Reserve Bank.

As per the RBI, issuing banks are permitted to buy back CDs before maturity, subject to certain conditions.

The central bank had issued draft directions for public comments in December 2020.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Friction over newer compliances rising between auditors, regulators, firms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks and auditors opposed the introduction of joint audit norms, it’s the turn of the Securities and Exchange Board of India‘s recent rules on due diligence by alternative investment funds that are causing consternation.

The market regulator’s recent rules require alternative investment funds to conduct in-depth due diligence of their portfolio companies. According to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021, which came into effect on May 5, the regulator has mandated that fund managers conduct this due diligence to make sure their house is in order.

The regulations mainly impact the private equity and venture capital funds that are registered under the Alternative Investment Funds Categories 1 & 2 and hedge funds registered under the AIF Category 3 in India.

The fund managers and trustees will have to ensure that detailed policies and procedures are in place for investments and that provisions over confidentiality, conflict of interest, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and addressing investor complaints are complied with.

The PPM (private placement memorandum) will be required to check on the detailed policy and procedures as well as the compliance with the code of conduct prescribed under the newly added fourth schedule. The format for reporting requirements to Sebi and trustees could also undergo a change. The new regulations would likely require funds to share the report or the procedures with the auditors.

The due diligence will have to be undertaken at the fund level as well as the investment level.

Fund managers will also have to realign investments to comply with the new regulations, as Sebi has put a threshold on the money a fund can invest in a company or another investment vehicle.

The RBI regulations

On April 27, the RBI released new guidelines for statutory auditors of financial entities to enhance the independence of auditors and tackle concentration issues. The guidelines require mandatory rotation of auditors after three years with a six-year cooling-off period, and appointment of joint auditors in entities having asset size of Rs 15,000 crore and above.

The regulations ran into opposition from bankers and auditors who wanted it to be deferred citing less time to appoint auditors and crunch. The new guidelines have come in at the end of April. We have to evaluate how we can sort of look at appointing new auditors so quickly.

Because the RBI guidelines say that existing auditors cannot continue (auditing) if they have done three years. I think in the case of most companies (non-bank lenders), the auditors would have already done more than three years, probably done four years… So, I hope that RBI defers this applicability by year or so because the year has already started, and a lot of them would have to start looking around for new audit firms,” Keki Mistry, MD and Vice Chairman Keki Mistry had told ETCFO.

“Many challenges here if implemented from FY22. Some bank auditors have already finished three years — they will only have weeks to make a new selection. The pool available to choose from will be limited for FY22 and many potential suitors would be conflicted under the new one-year cooling-off period having done such non-audit services in FY21,” Grant Thornton Bharat CEO Vishesh Chandiok had said.

Audit trail software

Earlier this year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had to defer by a year amendments to the companies accounts rules requiring firms to use accounting software that include features that can record the audit trail of each transaction.

Companies and auditors had cited little time left for the fiscal to end for them to shift to another software.

The second amendment to the Companies Accounts Rules, 2014, made the previous changes effective from April 1, 2022, according to the notification. The ministry had made the changes, to be effective from the start of the current fiscal, with the objective of curbing backdated entries by firms in the books of accounts.

“…for the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2021, every company which uses accounting software for maintaining its books of account, shall use only such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every transaction, creating an edit log of each change made in books of account along with the date when such changes were made and ensuring that the audit trail cannot be disabled,” the amendment made on March 25 had said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Sebi orders attachment of bank, demat, MF accounts of Rana Kapoor, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Markets regulator Sebi on Wednesday ordered attachment of bank accounts as well as share and mutual fund holdings of Rana Kapoor, former MD and CEO of Yes Bank, to recover dues of over Rs 1 crore.

The decision has been taken after Kapoor failed to pay the fine imposed on him.

Sebi, in September 2020, had levied a fine of Rs 1 crore on Kapoor for not making disclosures regarding a transaction of Morgan Credit, which was an unlisted promoter entity of Yes Bank.

By not disclosing about the transaction to Yes Bank’s board of directors, Kapoor created an opaque layer between him and stakeholders and violated the provision of the LODR (Listing Obligations and Dislcosure Requirements) Regulation, Sebi had said in the order.

Further, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) issued a demand notice to Kapoor in February this year, although he did not pay any dues.

The pending dues, totalling Rs 1.04 crore, include an initial fine of Rs 1 crore and an interest of Rs 4.56 lakh and a recovery cost of Rs 1,000, the attachment notice showed on Wednesday.

In the notice, Sebi has asked banks, depositories and mutual funds not to allow any debit from the accounts of Kapoor. However, credits have been permitted.

Further, the regulator has directed the banks to attach all accounts, including lockers, held by the defaulter.

“Whereas no amount has been paid by the defaulter (Kapoor).

“There is sufficient reason to believe that the defaulter may dispose of the amounts/ proceeds in the banks accounts held with your bank and realisation of amount due under the certificate would in consequence be delayed or obstructed,” Sebi said.

In a notice to all banks in the country, the regulator ordered to “attach with immediate effect…all accounts by whatever name, including lockers of the defaulter, held either singly or jointly with any other person, in your bank”.

The regulator has also asked banks, depositories and mutual funds to provide details of all accounts held by Kapoor, including copy of account statements for the past one year. It has also sought complete information of all loan accounts and advances.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Paytm Payments Bank can now issue payment mandates for IPOs as SEBI approves UPI handle

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Paytm Payments Bank had processed 340 million UPI transactions in February 2021. (File image)

Traders will now be able to use Paytm’s UPI handle @Paytm to invest in capital markets through different brokerage platforms. Paytm Payments Bank on Monday announced that capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has approved its UPI handle to ‘payment mandates for IPO application’. Paytm Payments Bank had processed 340 million UPI transactions amounting to Rs 38,493 crore in February 2021 while PhonePe led the UPI tally with 975 million transactions followed by 827 million transactions recorded by Google Pay, as per NPCI data. However, Paytm had registered the lowest technical decline rate of 0.05 per cent in January 2021 among other UPI remitter banks.

“We believe that every Indian has a right to access capital markets and benefit from the burgeoning list of successful companies which are listing in the stock market. This presents a big opportunity,” Satish Gupta, MD & CEO – Paytm Payments Bank said in a statement. The company added that it has partnered with its mutual funds investment platform Paytm Money to enable payment mandates for IPO applications and aimed to bring 10 million people to equity markets by FY22. It targetted to open “over 3.5 lakh demat accounts by year-end and expects 60 per cent of users to be from small cities,” the company said. The UPI handle will soon be activated across all brokerage platforms.

Also read: Easy Trip Planners IPO: Check share allotment via BSE, KFin Tech website; grey market premium, listing date

“Based on this year’s IPO data, it can be conveniently said that India represents a huge appetite for IPOs. From FY 2021, the country’s stock exchanges (both NSE and BSE combined) witnessed around 24 IPOs and raised proceeds worth Rs.48,493 crores in total from the capital markets,” it added. Paytm Payments Bank Limited had reported an increase in its profit after tax to Rs 29.8 crores in FY20 from Rs 19.2 crores in FY19 largely led by its higher customer acquisition in smaller cities. The annual revenue for the company also crossed Rs  2100 crores. The bank had facilitated over 485 crore transactions worth Rs. 4.6 lakh crores during the year while domestic money transfers accounted for around Rs 29,000 crores.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How new margin rules impact you

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has mandated upfront collection of margins in cash segment, like in the derivatives segment, and brought about changes in the way securities are being taken as margins.

In a circular issued last week, SEBI clarified that the upfront margin requirement includes ‘other margins’ in addition to value-at-risk (VaR) margin and extreme loss margin (ELM).

This means the applicable margin rate can at times be more than the 20 per cent that was announced earlier, depending on the security and its volatility.

And if investors opt to satisfy the margin obligation by offering securities they own, they should be pledged beforehand for expanded margin limit.

Upfront margins

Upfront margins are the minimum amount of fund or securities required to initiate a trade.

Now, the regulator has clarified that brokers should collect total margin upfront, ie, VaR, ELM plus other margins wherever applicable to penalties. Margin requirement can vary for each stock.

Consider this example. The applicable margin rate for the stock of HDFC Bank is 17.2 per cent (VaR 13.7 per cent, ELM 3.5 per cent, other margin is zero), whereas for the stock of Indiabulls Housing Finance, it is 61.5 per cent (VaR 43 per cent, ELM 3.5 per cent, other margin 15 per cent).

In the above scenario, even though the applicable margin rate for the stock of HDFC Bank is 17.2 per cent, investors should maintain 20 per cent if they wish to trade, ie, the margin obligation for the investor for a trade worth ₹1 lakh is ₹20,000. In the case of the Indiabulls stock, the required margin to execute a trade worth ₹1 lakh is 61.5 per cent, ie, ₹61,500.

In addition to the above, is the MTM (mark-to-market) margin, ie, margin to compensate unrealised loss, if any.

Margin pledge

Not only cash, investors can offer securities to fulfil the margin requirements. But under the new ‘margin pledge’ system, the limits will be increased only after the securities are pledged.

In the earlier system, prior pledging was not required.

The securities held by investors in their demat account were considered as margin by default, against which fresh trades could be executed.

Here, the brokers used the power of attorney (PoA) to move the shares as collateral from client demat account to their own demat account through title transfer.

The entire process was seamless and happened in the backend without the investor having to involve in the process. In the new system, in order to get additional margin against the securities they hold, the process should be initiated by investors through their demat account.

For instance, assume that an investor has funds worth ₹1 lakh and stock holdings worth ₹1 lakh in her demat account. Suppose if this investor wishes to initiate a trade which required an upfront margin of ₹1.5 lakh, in the earlier system — the trade will be executed as the broker will provide the margin by taking stocks worth ₹50,000 as collateral.

The whole process was done automatically. This has changed now. If the same investor wishes to execute a trade worth ₹1.5 lakh, the investor should pledge the shares worth ₹50,000 and enhance her limits to ₹1.5 lakh before initiating the trade.

Else, the new trade will not be executed.

Pledging process

Unlike in the earlier system wherein the pledging was initiated by brokers, the process is now initiated from the investor-end. That is, if an investor wishes to pledge securities to enhance the margin limit, it should be initiated from their own demat account. The investor will receive instructions from the depository (CDSL or NSDL).

Verification is done by following the instructions received, and the request for approval of pledging is made through an OTP (one-time password) verification.

If successful, the securities will be pledged, against which the investor will receive the additional margin facility. This margin can be used in cash as well as derivatives segment. Leading depository Central Depository Services (India) Ltd (CDSL) recently reduced the charges for margin pledge and unpledge. It has been reduced from ₹12 to ₹5 per request made by investors.

This cost, however small it may be, is additional burden for the market participants who opts to meet margin requirements by pledging.

Pros and cons

The upfront margin requirement rules will mean investors will now have to bring in more capital or increase margin limit for the same amount of transaction. This essentially brings down the return on investment.

And whenever the applicable margin rate is increased, investors will be required to provide additional funds or securities to satisfy the increased margin obligation.

However, more capital or margin requirement means lesser leverage and less room for over-trading, possibly bringing down losses and transaction costs.

Coming to the new pledging system, investor will have a greater control over leverage and can become more disciplined as prior planning of margin is required. And importantly, the prohibition of transfer of securities out of the investor demat account means there is no way of misuse which has been at the heart of the Karvy debacle.

Operational complexity has gone up as the investor need to follow certain procedures before the requested additional margin is made available. This can take time, and market participants looking for short-term opportunities might miss out on the trend.

And of course, there is a cost for pledging.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2