PMC Bank: Proposed scheme of amalgamation could be a test case for RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The proposed amalgamation of the scam-hit Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank with the newly floated Unity Small Finance Bank could be a test case for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regarding its approach towards how individual depositors with deposits up to ₹2 crore and those with deposits of ₹2 crore and above can be dealt with when it comes to withdrawal of money.

The Scheme being put together by the central bank is expected to be placed in public domain in a week or so for suggestions and objections from members, depositors and other creditors of transferor bank (PMC Bank) and transferee bank (Unity SFB).

As per Reserve Bank of India (Interest Rate on Deposits) Directions, 2016, a “Bulk Deposit” means a single Rupee term deposit of ₹2 crore and above for Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding Regional Rural banks) and Small Finance Banks.

So, a deposit of up to ₹2 crore is considered as a “Retail Deposit”.

The question uppermost on individual depositors’ (under the bulk deposit category) mind is whether the central bank will treat retail deposit and individual bulk deposit on an equal footing vis-a-vis withdrawal.

Phased withdrawal

Chander Purswani, President, PMC Depositors’ Forum, said the Scheme should clearly specify the threshold up to which individual deposits can be freely withdrawn and how deposits beyond this threshold can be withdrawn in a phased manner over, say, 3-5 years.

City Co-op Bank wants to emulate PMC Bank for reconstruction

Further, interest accrued on individual depositors’ deposits, be it retail or bulk, should be allowed to be withdrawn in toto.

He underscored that PMC Bank depositors have suffered over the last 26 months amid the Covid-19 pandemic as deposit withdrawal has been capped at ₹1 lakh of the total balance in their account(s) during the entire period that their Bank is under RBI’s Directions.

What this means is that depositors, especially senior citizens (who usually depend on interest earnings to meet monthly expenses), had to make do with only ₹3,846 a month over the last 26 months.

PMC Bank’s resolution could become a template for rescuing other weak UCBs

Purswani assessed that after taking into account deposit withdrawals of up to ₹1 lakh, PMC Bank has about 1.42 lakh depositors with deposits of over ₹1 lakh. Of this, there are about 43,000 depositors, including individuals, trusts, cooperative societies, etc, with deposits of over ₹5 lakh.

DICGC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of RBI, had upped the limit of insurance cover for depositors in the insured banks fivefold to ₹5 lakh per depositor with effect from February 4, 2020.

Individual depositors, including those with large deposits, need an assurance that they can systematically withdraw their money from Unity SFB, the Forum’s chief said.

Limited period incentive

He opined that the Scheme could also incorporate a limited period incentive, whereby PMC Bank depositors can earn higher interest rate over the card rate so that they are encouraged to keep the deposits with Unity SFB.

PMC Bank came to grief as its high exposure to real estate company HDIL turned non-performing.

The central bank red-flagged the fraud/financial irregularities in the bank and manipulation of its books of accounts.

Last month, RBI granted banking licence to Unity SFB, which has been established jointly by the Centrum Financial Services Ltd (CFSL) and Resilient Innovations Private Limited (BharatPe), to carry on SFB business in India.

RBI had accorded “in-principle” approval to CFSL, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Centrum Capital Ltd, on June 18, 2021, to set up an SFB.

The “in-principle” approval was in specific pursuance to CFSL’s February 2021 offer in response to PMC Bank’s November 2020 Expression of Interest (EoI) notification.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Enforcement Directorate attaches HDIL group’s shares worth Rs 233 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday said it has attached partly-paid compulsorily convertible preference shares worth Rs 233 crore of HDIL group companies in the alleged multi-crore-rupee PMC bank fraud and money-laundering case. It said “on the strength” of these shares, HDIL had the rights for allotment of under-construction flats measuring 90,250 square feet FSI (floor space index) in Mumbai’s Ghatkopar of developer Aryaman Developers Private Limited.

“The developer has given an undertaking to ensure not to sell, transfer, alienate or create any third-party rights on completion of the project,” the ED said.

The agency has filed a money-laundering case to probe the alleged loan fraud in the Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank in October, 2019 against the Housing Development Infrastructure Limited (HDIL), its promoters Rakesh Kumar Wadhawan, his son Sarang Wadhawan, its former chairman Waryam Singh and former managing director Joy Thomas.

The others under the agency’s scanner include the promoters and executives of Somerset Construction Private Limited, Serveall Construction Private Limited, Sapphire Land Development Private Limited, Emerald Realtors Private Limited, Awas Developers and Construction Private Limited, Prithvi Realtors and Hotels Private Limited and Satyam Realtors Private Limited.

The father-son duo were arrested by the ED in the case in October, 2019 and they are lodged in a Mumbai jail at present.

“Rakesh Wadhawan and other promoters of HDIL have fraudulently utilised the funds taken from the PMC Bank in various projects by projecting the same as untainted.

“During 2011-12, an amount of Rs 233 crore was transferred from HDIL group companies to the group companies of Mukesh Doshi of Mumbai and these funds were finally utilised by Aryaman Developers Private Limited in the slum rehabilitation project being developed in Ghatkopar East, Mumbai,” the ED said in a statement.

According to the understanding between Rakesh Wadhawan and Doshi, HDIL group companies would be allotted constructed area of FSI measuring 90,250 sq. ft of the carpet area in the proposed building.

“For this project, Aryaman Developers had its own investments, including loans from banks. The funds were utilised for the payment of land premium, rent to slum dwellers, construction of transit camps, fungible premium, construction of rehab and IOD (intimation of disapproval) deposit with the slum rehabilitation authority.

“The promoters of HDIL intended to take a backdoor exit from the project and approached Aryaman Developers for a settlement at Rs 150 crore for not causing hindrance in the ongoing project for slum rehabilitation,” the ED alleged.

It claimed that an “undertaking” was taken from Doshi in the form of an affidavit to ensure that the project after development would not fall in the hands of accused Rakesh Wadhawan.

Describing the role of HDIL in the alleged default with the PMC Bank, the ED said its group companies availed loans from the bank from time to time.

“The mode and manner of operation of bank accounts of HDIL clearly indicate the connivance of PMC bank officials with the promoters of HDIL.

“There was misconduct on the part of PMC officials as they ignored all the prevailing procedures to facilitate promoters of HDIL by extending unusual credit facility,” it alleged.

Instead of declaring those as non-performing assets (NPAs) for initiating actions for recovery, PMC bank officials chose to “accommodate” the HDIL group, the agency alleged.

“Due to such a criminal act of the promoters of HDIL group companies, the PMC Bank suffered a huge wrongful loss to the tune of Rs 6,117.93 crore,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IndusInd bank thought they had securities even as legal notices were ignored, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Repeated requests, follow ups and legal notices slapped on Karvy Stock Broking Ltd (KSBL) did not help IndusInd Bank since 2019 in ensuring repayment of Rs 137 crore loan taken from them.

“The bank tried its best to get clarity on the repayment schedule or the status of repayment. Despite repeated oral remainders and calls to C Parthasarathy, no reply was forthcoming as to when the repayment will be made,” IndusInd Bank told police at the time of lodging the complaint.

“On some occasions they assured the bank that they will pay on time and even at this stage they confirmed that security was available to cover the bank’s exposure,” the bank said.

Later, the bank served demand notices to KSBL and Parthasarathy saying that they repay the dues in five days. At this stage, the bank was under the impression that they are secured since they have sufficient collateral in the form of pledged securities to recover the outstanding dues.

But IndusInd bank got a rude shock after SEBI in November 2019 took action against KSBL, and IndusInd bank knew they had no collateral left as a surety. Finally, IndusInd bank approached Hyderabad police detective department.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Distraught depositors want PMC Bank revived soon

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Distraught depositors of the scam-hit Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank want the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to speed up revival/reconstruction of the bank as they are in dire need of money to meet exigencies arising from the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Some of the depositors, especially the elderly, are barely able to get by despite having lakhs and crores of rupees locked up in the bank, as the RBI clamped down on deposit withdrawal since September 24, 2019, capping it at ₹1 lakh per depositor for the entire period that the bank is under Directions.

With RBI extending its Directions against the bank for the fourth time from April 1 to June 30, 2021, depositors are wringing their hands in despair that even after 19 months no solution to their woes is in sight.

RBI extends ‘directions’ against PMC Bank by 3 months

They pointed out that while depositors of other troubled banks such as YES Bank and Lakshmi Vilas Bank were rescued in double-quick time, when it comes to their bank, the rescue process has been drawn out.

Complex process, says RBI

Chander Purswani, President, PMC Depositors’ Forum, said: “The Bank should be revived/ reconstructed on SOS basis…Depositors are losing their lives amid the raging pandemic. These are testing times for all of us. The authorities should have some mercy on us.”

PMC Bank revival: Phased deposit withdrawal likely for customers

In a statement issued on March 26, 2021, the RBI observed that PMC Bank had received binding offers from certain investors for its reconstruction, in response to the Expression of Interest (EOI) floated by the bank in November 2020.

“RBI and PMC Bank are presently engaging with prospective investors in order to secure best possible terms for the depositors and other stakeholders while ensuring long-term viability of the reconstructed entity,” the central bank said.

The RBI also emphasised that given the financial condition of PMC Bank, the process is complex and is likely to take some more time.

Depositors’ angst: tweets say it all

Vasu Chhabria (@vasuchhabria) tweeted: “Reqst PMCBank Reconstruction/Resolution on war footing. Depositors losing lives. Pls don’t punish innocent citizens tax payers.

“Delay is costing lives. 19 months passed 118 depositors dead. What is their fault? It’s their hard earned money…”

Prem Kodnani (@drkodnani) tweeted: “If corona virus symptoms 1: difficult to get tested 2: difficult to get ambulance 3: difficult to get bed 4: difficult to get oxygen 5: difficult to get Remedesivir 6: to get all this, we require money…”

Srikanth Iyer (@SrikanthIyer10) tweeted: “Pls have humanity towards us v r also citizens of India rescue us by merging Pmc Bank with nationalised bank immediately it’s need of the hour…We can’t have access to our own hard-earned money.”

PMC bank was placed under RBI Directions with effect from the close of business on September 23, 2021, due to a huge fraud perpetrated by the promoter of a real estate group and some bank officials.

The Centrum-BharatPe combine is believed to be the front-runner in the race to buy PMC Bank.

As per the EOI floated by PMC Bank in November 2020, subsequent to commencement of the normal day-to-day operations, it will be open for the investor(s) to convert the bank into a Small Finance Bank (SFB) by making an application to RBI, subject to compliance with the RBI guidelines on Voluntary Transition of Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (UCBs) into SFBs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How to spot a shaky bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In the case of Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB), RBI has capped deposit withdrawals at ₹ 25000 for a 30-day period, while a merger is in the works. If you’re keen to avoid such episodes with your bank deposits in future, how do you spot the trouble signs in a bank?

Financial checks

Growth and profits in the banking business are fuelled mainly by leverage. For every ₹ 100 of assets in a bank’s balance sheet, it may have just ₹ 4 of its own capital, with deposits and borrowings making up the rest. This is what makes banks particularly fragile entities that can be tripped up by defaults, delays in loan repayments or funding constraints.

Four financial ratios can alert you early to brewing trouble. The first is the capital adequacy or capital to risk weighted assets (CRAR) ratio, which measures the amount of its own and supplementary capital held by a bank for every rupee of loans advanced by it.

A sub-set of this is the Tier I CRAR, which represents the bank’s permanent capital consisting of equity, reserves and other capital against which losses can be set off. Indian banks are required to maintain a minimum CRAR of 10.875 per cent and Tier I CRAR of 8.875 per cent. LVB had a CRAR of just 0.17 per cent as of June 2020, with a negative Tier I CRAR. SBI, in contrast, had a CRAR of 14.87 per cent and Tier 1 CRAR of 12.10 per cent as of September 30, 2020.

Then, there’s the quantum of doubtful loans in the bank’s books, as measured by its NPA (Non-performing asset) ratio. The gross NPA ratio measures the proportion of loans given out that are overdue for over 90 days.

The net NPA ratio measures bad loans after the bank has made provisions. Broadly, gross and net NPA ratios that are below 5 per cent signal reasonable health, but trends in this ratio are more important to watch. A more than 0.5 percentage point quarterly jump in the NPA ratio suggests problems escalating.

Leverage ratio captures the extent of a bank’s Tier I capital to its total loans. The RBI allows banks to run with a ratio of 3.5-4 per cent, but a ratio above 5 is a comfortable number. HDFC Bank boasted a leverage ratio of 10.71 per cent in September 2020 quarter.

To gauge if a bank has enough cash to meet its near-term dues, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, is your guide. Measured as the high-quality liquid assets held by the bank against its dues over the next 30 days, the higher this ratio is above 100 per cent the better placed it is on liquidity. LVB was comfortable on this score with an LCR of 294 per cent in June 2020.

These ratios are readily available for every scheduled commercial bank on a quarterly basis, in the document ‘Basel III-Pillar 3’ disclosures on the bank’s website.

RBI actions

If RBI believes that a bank is walking a tightrope on indicators such as NPAs, CRAR or return on assets, it can immediately subject it to Prompt Corrective Action (PCA). During PCA, RBI can impose a variety of business restrictions on a bank, induct new management, replace Board members or even merge it with another. Most PCA measures impact a bank’s financials and growth plans, until afresh capital infusion helps them pull out of PCA.

Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India, UCO Bank and United Bank of India are under the RBI’s PCA framework. LVB was put under RBI’s PCA framework in September 2019. Depositors need to worry more about private sector banks being under PCA than public sector banks, as the latter can be quickly bailed out by the Government infusing new capital, while private banks will need to find bona fide investors.

Management churn

If a bank you’re invested with sees a string of top management exits before their term is done, it could be an indication of governance issues. The RBI actions to replace or remove the bank’s CEO or Board members or to supersede the Board are a red rag and provide early warning of suspected governance issues. Skirmishes between key shareholder factions or churn on top appointees are trouble signs, too.

LVB saw shareholders voting out the re-appointment of its MD and CEO along with a clutch of directors in its recent AGM. Yes Bank saw RBI refuse another term to its founder and a string of independent director exits before the moratorium.

Stock prices

When a bank share suffers a precipitous drop or trades at a fraction of reported book value, your antennae should be up for likely problems. A bank share trading at a fraction of its book value could mean that the stock market is under-valuing a good business. But more often, it could mean that it is sceptical about the reported value of the bank’s book. Stock markets, after all, were ahead of rating agencies in spotting problems at stressed NBFCs; they may not be far off the mark with banks.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY