Public sector banks recover Rs 1 lakh crore from written-off accounts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public banks have recovered around Rs 1 lakh crore they had written off in the last few years, according to finance ministry officials.

There has been discussion around “write-off” of over Rs 8 lakh crore during the last seven years, the government
believes that these are technical in nature and are actually meant to bring about transparency in bank balance sheets.

The steps taken by the government over the last few years — from enacting Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code and strengthening other laws to administrative measures — have helped banks recover around Rs 5.5 lakh crore of bad debt including Rs 99,996 from accounts that had been technically written off. Banks have used multiple sources — accruals, fundraising from the market and capital infusion by the government — to comply with the regulatory requirements.

Internal accruals and market raising account for as much as 70% of the provisioning done during the last few years.

The write-offs

Public sector banks have written off a massive Rs 8 lakh crore worth of loans since 2014, more than double the capital of Rs 3.37 lakh crore infused by the government in them.

The highest infusion was in fiscal 2019 when Rs 1.06 lakh crore were infused while in 2020-21, the government put in Rs 14,500 crore into four public sector banks.

The maximum write-offs were in fiscal 2019 at Rs 1.83 lakh crore, following by FY20 at Rs 1.75 lakh crore.

Reduction in non-performing assets due to write-offs for public sector banks stood at Rs 1,31,894 crore during fiscal 2020-21.

In FY2019-20, the number stood at Rs 1,75,877 crore, the RBI said

In the last seven years, bank credit to the industrial sector dropped to 28.9% in 2021 as compared to 42.7% in 2014. Credit to the retail sector grew from 16.2% to 26.3% in the last seven years.

The comparison

The loans write-off between 2015 and 2019 were more than three times compared to the figures of bad loans written off during the previous Congress-led UPA regime from 2004-2014, as per an RTI revelation.

During the UPA’s 10-year rule, around Rs2,20,328 crore was written off by various banks, and this figure shot up to Rs 7,94,354 crore during the NDA regime from 2015-2019, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the banks’ NPAs.

The RTI reply figures around two-dozen public sector banks (PSBs), some three-dozen in the private sector, nine scheduled commercial banks, a four-dozen foreign banks, and several in each category not written off any loans.

Of the loan write-offs in the UPA decade (2004-2014), the PSBs accounted for approximately Rs 1,58,994 crore, while the private banks’ amounts were Rs41,391 crore and for foreign banks it was Rs 19,945 crore, with no write-offs by Scheduled Banks.

Later, in the NDA regime (2015-2019), the PSBs accounted for a stupendous Rs 6,24,370 crore loan write-off, with the private banks writing off Rs 1,51,989 crore and the foreign banks shared the remaining 17,995 crore, (Total—Rs7,94,354 crore), besides an additional write-off by scheduled banks totalling Rs 1,295 crore (Total – Rs 7,95,649 crore).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

At Rs 8 lakh crore, PSB write-offs more than double the capital infusion by govt, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector banks have written off a massive Rs 8 lakh crore worth of loans since 2014, more than double the capital of Rs 3.37 lakh crore infused by the government in them.

The highest infusion was in fiscal 2019 when rs 1.06 lakh crore were infused while in 2020-21, the government put in Rs 14,500 crore into four public sector banks.

The maximum write-offs were in fiscal 2019 at Rs 1.83 lakh crore, following by FY20 at Rs 1.75 lakh crore.

Reduction in non-performing assets due to write-offs for public sector banks stood at Rs 1,31,894 crore during fiscal 2020-21.

In FY2019-20, the number stood at Rs 1,75,877 crore, the RBI said

In the last seven years, bank credit to the industrial sector dropped to 28.9% in 2021 as compared to 42.7% in 2014. Credit to the retail sector grew from 16.2% to 26.3% in the last seven years.

The comparison

The loans write-off between 2015 and 2019 were more than three times compared to the figures of bad loans written off during the previous Congress-led UPA regime from 2004-2014, as per an RTI revelation.

During the UPA’s 10-year rule, around Rs2,20,328 crore was written off by various banks, and this figure shot up to Rs7,94,354 crore during the NDA regime from 2015-2019, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the banks’ NPAs.

The RTI reply figures around two-dozen public sector banks (PSBs), some three-dozen in the private sector, nine scheduled commercial banks, a four-dozen foreign banks, and several in each category not written off any loans.

Of the loan write-offs in the UPA decade (2004-2014), the PSBs accounted for approximately Rs 1,58,994 crore, while the private banks’ amounts were Rs41,391 crore and for foreign banks it was Rs 19,945 crore, with no write-offs by Scheduled Banks.

Later, in the NDA regime (2015-2019), the PSBs accounted for a stupendous Rs 6,24,370 crore loan write-off, with the private banks writing off Rs 1,51,989 crore and the foreign banks shared the remaining 17,995 crore, (Total—Rs7,94,354 crore), besides an additional write-off by scheduled banks totalling Rs 1,295 crore (Total – Rs 7,95,649 crore).

During the NDA rule, there was some recovery from the write-offs between 2015 and 2019— Rs 82,571 crore, or roughly 12% of the total Rs 7,94,354 crore, were written off.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI, HDFC Bank want RBI inspection reports kept under wraps, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India and HDFC Bank have opposed the Supreme Court order that had said the Reserve Bank of India can divulge inspection reports of commercial banks through Right To Information applications. The court has kept the hearing for Thursday. The RBI had allowed making such reports public following a Supreme Court order in 2015. Then, it was agreed that the entire report would not be made public, but the relevant portions on bad debts, and borrowers etc.

However, even such information can disclose much information about the borrowers, which violates various client confidentiality clauses of banks, the lenders argue.

The SC verdict in April

In a major blow to banks, the Supreme Court in April this year had refused to recall its 2015 judgment, which had held that the RBI will have to provide information about the banks and financial institutions (FIs) regulated by it under the transparency law.

Several FIs and banks, including the Canara Bank, the Bank of Baroda, the UCO Bank and the Kotak Mahindra Bank had filed applications in the top court seeking a recall of the 2015 judgment in the Jayantilal N Mistry case, saying the verdict had far-reaching consequences and moreover, they were directly and substantially affected by it.

The banks had contended that the pleas for a recall of the judgment, instead of a review, is “maintainable” as there was a violation of the principles of natural justice in view of the fact that they were neither parties to the matter nor heard.

“A close scrutiny of the applications for a recall makes it clear that in substance, the applicants are seeking a review of the judgment in Jayantilal N Mistry. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that these applications are not maintainable,” a bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran said.

The order, written by Justice Rao, said in the instant case, the dispute relates to information to be provided by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under the Right to Information Act (RTI) and though the information pertained to banks, it was the decision of the RBI that was in challenge and decided by this court.

The RBI stance

The RBI in 2019 has declined to share details of banks inspection reports citing a section of the transparency law that exempts public authority from disclosing information that may prejudicially affect sovereignty, security or economic interests of the country.

Replying to an RTI query, the central bank also said furnishing the requested information will disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was asked to provide copies of all the annual financial inspection reports, concurrent audit or inspection reports carried out between 2007 and 2015 on foreign currency derivative contracts sold by the 19 banks that were earlier penalised by it.

“The requested information pertains to inspection reports of 19 banks for a period of eight years from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2015. Therefore the total number of reports would be 152 (one report per bank for 19 banks for eight years i.e. 152).

“Furnishing the requested information will disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority,” the RBI said in reply to the RTI query filed by S Dhananjayan.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RTI reply, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


INDORE: As many as 2,118 branches of 10 public sector banks have either been closed or merged with other banks in the last fiscal, according to an RTI reply.

The highest number of 1,283 branches of Bank of Baroda were either closed or merged, according to information provided to an RTI query filed by Neemuch-based activist Chandrashekhar Gaud.

No branch of Bank of India and UCO bank was closed in the last fiscal. The government consolidated ten PSU banks into four in the last financial year, bringing the number of nationalised banks to 12.

All India Bank Employees Association general secretary CH Venkatachalam said a dip in the number of the public sector banks was not in the interest of the banking industry and domestic economy.

He said there was a need to expand the branches of the banks to cater to the vast population in the country.

Bringing down the number of bank branches has reduced employment opportunities in the banking sector following which the young people were frustrated, Venkatachalam added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Can’t reveal info of customers, recall RTI order, banks tell SC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Nearly six years after the Supreme Court ruled that RBI had to reveal information about functioning of banks under the RTI Act, major banks, including SBI and HDFC, on Friday urged the court to recall its order as they cannot reveal confidential information of account holders who may sue them for putting such details in public domain.

The SC had in 2015 directed that RBI can’t refuse to reveal information under the transparency law on financial health of banks under the pretext of ‘fiduciary relations’ with financial institutions and had held that the regulator was supposed to “uphold public interest and not the interest of banks”. Another round of litigation was initiated after RBI didn’t comply with the SC order and the court issued contempt notice. The proceedings were wound up in 2019 with RBI being given the last opportunity to comply to disclose its Annual Financial Inspection report of banks.

With RBI asking the banks to provide information to be disclosed under the RTI Act, third round of litigations has started with all major banks filing fresh applications and petitions seeking quashing or recall of earlier direction. Banks such as SBI, PNB, HDFC, Bank of India, Bank of Baroda made a pitch for re-examining the issue. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta with advocates Harish Salve and Mukul Rohatgi contended before a bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran the banking industry could be affected and the SC order might be misused for corporate rivalry. They said only RBI was heard by the SC and the banks were not parties in the litigation.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY