RBI allows banks to sell fraud loans to asset reconstruction companies

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The guidelines said that lenders must put in place a comprehensive board-approved policy for transfer and acquisition of all loan exposures.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday allowed banks to sell fraud loan exposures to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs). Banks will now be able to transfer to ARCs loan exposures classified as fraud as on the date of transfer, provided that the responsibilities of the bank with respect to continuous reporting, monitoring, filing of complaints with law enforcement agencies and proceedings related to such complaints shall also be transferred to the ARC.

“The transfer of such loan exposures to an ARC, however, does not absolve the transferor from fixing the staff accountability as required under the extant instructions on frauds,” the RBI said in its master direction on transfer of loan exposures.

The guidelines said that lenders must put in place a comprehensive board-approved policy for transfer and acquisition of all loan exposures. These guidelines must lay down the minimum quantitative and qualitative standards relating to due diligence, valuation, requisite IT systems for capture, storage and management of data, risk management and periodic board-level oversight.

The board-approved policies of every lender on transfer or acquisition of stressed loans shall cover the norms and procedure for transfer, the valuation methodology to be followed, delegation of powers to various functionaries for taking decisions on the transfer of loans, stated objectives for acquiring stressed assets and the risk premium to be applied.

When negotiated on a bilateral basis, the negotiations must necessarily be followed by an auction through the Swiss challenge method if the aggregate exposure of lenders to the relevant borrower is `100 crore or more. In all other cases, the bilateral negotiations shall be subject to the price discovery and value maximisation approaches adopted by the transferor as part of the board-approved policy, the RBI said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI ex-Guv Subbarao explains why RBI is anxious about cryptocurrency, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stated multiple times that it has “serious” and “major” concerns about cryptocurrencies without ever explaining what those concerns could be. The central bank’s aversion to virtual currencies is seen as one of the primary motivations behind the government’s bill to ban all private cryptocurrencies.

The crypto industry believes the central bank is looking at cryptocurrencies through a narrow lens and is failing to appreciate the various use cases for such virtual currencies. The industry’s argument is that cryptocurrencies are a digital asset, and not a threat to the monetary sovereignty of the rupee.

While concerns that cryptocurrencies can facilitate money laundering and terror financing are being expressed globally, RBI, on its part, has shied away from explaining its key concerns in detail, leaving the crypto industry scratching its head.

In an interview with ETMarkets.com, former RBI Governor Dr D Subbarao said RBI’s concerns over cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are three-fold.

Monetary Stability
RBI is the sole manager of currency in the economy and is responsible for the upkeep of the monetary system. Subbarao believes if virtual currencies gained traction, then it could threaten the monetary stability, as “it is quite possible that domestic price formation could be set in that virtual currency.”

Financial Stability
For Subbarao, the threat to the financial stability of the Indian economy from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin is simple. “If regulated institutions, banks for example, are exposed to virtual currencies and if that currency is very volatile, then there could be financial instability,” Subbarao said.

The former finance secretary believes the threat to financial stability is particularly large from virtual currencies that do not have an intrinsic value and are backed by just algorithms, like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Capital Outflow
Interestingly, Subbarao sees virtual currencies such as Bitcoin as a threat to the stability of the external sector of India. “Cryptocurrencies could become a conduit for capital flight, especially in a country like India where there is still no full convertibility of capital,” the former governor said.

In that light, Subbarao sees the efforts of central banks to create their own central bank digital currencies (CBDC) as a defensive mechanism. A central bank digital currency is a virtual version of the sovereign currency of the country and is issued by the central bank. This is different from private cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which is issued by private citizens.

Subbarao, who helmed the central bank during Global Financial Crisis as well as the infamous ‘taper tantrum’ period of 2013-14, is of the view that Facebook’s plans to launch a stablecoin back in 2016 (Libra) was the turning from when central banks saw cryptocurrencies as an assault to their sovereignty.

The former governor, who currently resides in Singapore, believes RBI’s primary motivation to launch a central bank digital currency is to not be left behind. “Main motivation is to ensure that it is not left behind in a world where CBDCs might become very ubiquitous,” Subbarao said.

CBDCs could also help the central bank reduce the high costs that it bears in printing and maintaining currency in circulation. However, in an economy where payment systems have already become very penetrative and virtual wallets are growing every minute, Subbarao sees little incentive for individuals to move away from private cryptocurrencies.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank reports fraudulent NPA accounts worth ₹305 cr to RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian Bank, Public sector lender has informed the exchanges that it has declared two non performing asset (NPA) accounts worth over ₹300 crore as fraud and reported them to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The nature of fraud in both the cases has been defined as “Diversion of funds” by the lender.

“In terms of Sebi regulations and having regard to the Bank’s policy on determination and disclosures of material events/ information, we have to inform you that two NPAs accounts have been declared as fraud and reported to RBI as per regulatory requirement,” Indian Bank said in a filing.

The NPA accounts, related to Kiratpur Ner Chowk Expressway Ltd and Tantia Constructions Ltd, are worth ₹172.73 crore and ₹132.41 crore respectively.

On Thursday, Indian Bank’s scrip closed flat at ₹131.95 on NSE.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Share of private sector banks in total bank deposits continued to rise at the cost of public sector banks and stood at 30.5 per cent (29.5 per cent a year ago), accounting for about half of the deposits of financial and non-financial corporations as well as the rest of the world sectors.

Bank deposits grew (y-o-y) by 11.9 per cent during the 2020-21 (8.8 per cent in the previous year) on the back of high growth in current account and savings account (CASA) deposits; the share of CASA deposits increased to 43.7 per cent in March 2021 (41.7 per cent a year ago), according to RBI data.

Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits

Households dominate

Among institutional categories, the household sector held 64.1 per cent share in total deposits; individuals, including Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), were the major constituent of the household sector and contributed 55.8 per cent in aggregate deposits.

Bank deposits of non-financial corporations surged by 18.8 per cent during 2020-21 and their share in total deposits increased to 16.2 per cent in March-2021.

Metropolitan branches of banks, which account for over half of total deposits, accounted for 59.6 per cent of incremental deposits during 2020-21 (43.2 per cent last year).

Three major states (Maharashtra, UP and Karnataka) held one-third of total household sectors’ outstanding deposits and over 40 per cent of its incremental deposits during 2020-21, according to RBI.

Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits

Term deposits

With the downward shift in the interest rates on term deposits, the share of term deposits carrying less than 6 per cent interest rate surged to 69.0 per cent in March 2021 from 21.3 per cent a year ago; the interest rate bracket ‘5 to less than 6 per cent had highest concentration (36.8 per cent) of total term deposits.

The majority of term deposits were originally contracted for ‘one year to less than three years’ maturity.

The share of short-term deposits (original maturity of less than one-year) rose to 32.8 per cent (25.4 per cent a year ago); in terms of residual maturity, 75.7 per cent of the term deposits were due for maturity within one year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Imitating a fintech firm not the right business model: Former RBI Deputy Gov

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks should avoid ‘imitating’ fintech companies in their attempt to re-imagine themselves but should look for meaningful co-operation with such companies to enhance their business.

According to SS Mundra, Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the process of re-imagination of business models for banks has already started. However, increasingly a number of banks have been evolving like fintech companies.

“Banks have to realise that fintech companies are competitive and nimble. So a bank trying to imitate a fintech company in totality is not the right approach to my mind and it is not the right business model. I think what is beneficial for both of them is to have a meaningful co-operation,” he said at the 14th edition of the two-day Banking Colloquium organised by CII, held virtually on Tuesday.

Such co-operation would help them both leverage on their respective strengths, Mundra said. While fintech companies have the strength of being nimble, innovative and fast-footed banks have the advantage of having a good resource base, reach, faith and trust of people and these can be complementary.

Banks should further avoid the temptation of introducing too many products or too many processes at too short an interval as it tends to leave both their staff and customers confused.

Rationalise branches

“There has to be a well-designed and well-decided pace at which such changes are introduced. Otherwise we have seen in some cases it may lead to unforeseen problem or a regulatory displeasure so one has to be conscious,” he pointed out.

At a time when digital has become a way of life, it is very important to take a “hard look” at the traditional branch-led business model, he said, talking about the need to rationalise branches.

“I am not suggesting that branches should go away but there is a need to reimagine the business model. One has to see which are the branches that are loss-making, contributing positively, can be downsized and can be completely done away with, and where you can rely completely on technology and where you can rely on agency arrangement. For every bank, it is important to do a complete holistic assessment of their branch network and how to derive maximum value from this,” he said.

According to Mundra, corporate lending, which once constituted the biggest chunk in banks’ loan book, has shrunk, with corporates deleveraging and finding alternative methods of financing themselves.

It would no longer be profitable for a bank to sell only a product to a corporate, as most corporates are now expecting “solutions” from banking system. “You need to adopt a solution-based approach if you want to do corporate banking,” he said.

One of the sectors which banks could look to ramp up is the MSME portfolio as there is more availability of information, date and GST has changed the entire landscape of the sector, Mundra said. “But here again the gradual movement would have to be from product to solution. In the retail sector, banks should leverage on the co-origination model,” he added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kotak Mahindra Bank forays into healthcare lending; not to use RBI’s liquidity window, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Kotak Mahindra Bank on Tuesday announced its foray into the healthcare lending space, where it will be taking exposures of up to Rs 15 crore apiece. The private sector lender, however, will not be seeking funds from the Reserve Bank’s on-tap liquidity scheme for the sector, as its cost of funds is very low, its President and Head of Business Banking Assets, Sunil Daga, said.

In May this year, the RBI had announced an on-tap liquidity window of Rs 50,000 crore for on-lending by banks to the healthcare sector, where they can take exposures of up to three years and access funding at the repo rate.

Daga said the bank’s cost of funds is “very competitive” and hence, it will not be accessing the RBI window. Even without the central bank’s special window, the business is exciting, he added.

Till now, Kotak Mahindra Bank had been providing funds to the healthcare sector but now it has a focused offering, Daga said, adding that the business will be part of its consumer segment.

Daga declined to specify the size of its current healthcare book, but added that it was miniscule. Now, the bank has created a dedicated pan-India team to cater to this business.

It will take exposures ranging from healthcare-related loans for an individual, to long-term project lending for doctors building healthcare infrastructure, he said, adding that single exposure can go up to Rs 15 crore.

The bank is targeting to start with signing up 100 customers a month and will be aiming to take it up to 500 a month, Daga said.

The loans will be both secured as well as unsecured, and also include a quick approval for exposures up to Rs 50 lakh, the bank said in a statement.

The loan tenure will be between 12 to 84 months, while the loan to value ratio can go up to 85 per cent, as per its website.

Click here to read more stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How did public sector banks become profitable in FY21?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman last week, while making the announcement of the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, claimed that the performance of public sector banks has improved, with just two public sector banks reporting losses.

“In 2018, just two out of 21 public sector banks were profitable. But in 2021, only two banks reported losses for the full year,” she had said.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore

From 2015, when the Reserve Bank of India conducted an Asset Quality Review (AQR), public sector banks started to make a lot of provisions in their loans. Non performing assets in the banking sector jumped 80% in FY16, according to RBI data, quoted in the July 2015 AQR.

The AQR created havoc on banks’ profitability, especially affecting state-owned banks because majority of their loans were provided to corporates.

Banks had been directed to keep increasing provisioning of accounts that were restructured from 5% to 15%, and accounts that were classified as sub-standard (first category of NPA), would slip into doubtful category if it stayed sub-standard for 12 months, attracting 40% provisioning. And if the loan is not serviced at all, the bank would have to treat it as a loss account with 100% provisioning.

Major PSBs reported record losses for the first time in the fourth quarter of FY16, like Bank of Baroda with Rs 3,230 crore and Punjab National Bank with Rs 5,367 crore.

Banks entered an NPA cycle, till 2021. The government came out with two major relief measures – recapitalisation, starting 2017, and merger of smaller public sector banks with large anchor banks.

Also read: Several NPAs transferred to bad bank may head to liquidation, cost govt a bomb

“Mergers of the banks is the step in the right direction as fewer banks with larger balance sheets would be able to compete better in the market,” said Yuvraj Choudhary, research analyst at Anand Rathi Financial Services.

In FY18, there were a total of 21 public sector banks, and as Sitharaman said, only two public sector banks reported profits – Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank.

“PSBs were reeling under corporate asset quality burden for long, more so after RBI’s AQR exercise. This was aggravated by forced mergers, which led to losses due to accelerated recognition and provisioning. Growth too decelerated as banks were busy with merger and had capital constraints,” an analyst with Emkay Global Financial Services said.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY18 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India (-) 6,547 crore
Punjab National Bank (-) 12,283 crore
Bank of Baroda (-) 2,432 crore
Bank of India (-) 6.044 crore
Central Bank of India (-) 5,105 crore
Canara Bank (-) 4,222 crore
Union Bank of India (-) 5,247 crore
Indian Overseas Bank (-) 6,300 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-) 744 crore
Indian Bank 1,259 crore
UCO Bank (-) 4,436 crore
Bank of Maharashtra (-) 1,146 crore
Oriental Bank of Commerce (-) 5,872 crore
United Bank of India (-) 1,455 crore
Andhra Bank (-) 3,413 crore
Allahabad Bank (-) 4,674 crore
Corporation Bank (-) 4,054 crore
Syndicate Bank (-) 3,223 crore
IDBI Bank (-) 8,238 crore
Dena Bank (-) 1,923 crore
Vijaya Bank 727 crore

Starting FY21, only 12 state-owned banks have remained. Six weaker PSBs had been merged with four anchor banks – Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were merged with Union Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India with Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank, and Allahabad Bank with Indian Bank.

In 2019, Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank were merged with Bank of Baroda, and IDBI Bank was recategorised as a private bank, with Life Insurance Corporation of India buying 51% stake. So far, IDBI Bank is the only PSB that has been privatised.

Mergers of public sector banks aided in reducing operation costs for the banks, but banks are not in the position to absorb any weak banks, according to analysts. “This is true even for SBI. Privatization of weak banks is the best way to weed them out,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Though mergers had caused a bit of a correction in the PSBs’ profitability earlier, mergers did not have any role to play in their profitability in FY21, analysts said.

“PSBs have turned profitable since past few quarters mainly due to healthy treasury gains and some lumpy corporate resolutions, (for eg. Bhushan Power). Impact of COVID-19 on corporate portfolio was relatively moderate, leading to further moderation in NPAs and lower incremental provisioning, which supported profitability,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Of the 12 banks, only two reported losses in FY21 – Punjab & Sind Bank and Central Bank of India.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY21 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India 20,410 crore
Punjab National Bank 2,022 crore
Bank of Baroda 829 crore
Bank of India 2,160 crore
Central Bank of India (-)888 crore
Canara Bank 2,558 crore
Union Bank of India 2,905 crore
Indian Overseas Bank 831 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-)2,732 crore
Indian Bank 3,004 crore
UCO Bank 167 crore
Bank of Maharashtra 550 crore

Sitharaman, at the press conference last week, also said that banks have recovered Rs 3.1 lakh crore since March 2018.

This was possible because sizeable recovery from lumpy corporate NPAs, by way of cash and write-offs, was expected. Some resolutions including Essar, Bhushan, were major contributors to these recovery numbers, analysts said.

Click here to read all our stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank lending hit as corporates head to bond St, fintech firms poach retail borrowers, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Overall bank lending could drop during this fiscal as corporate loan demand slumps and other sources of borrowings emerge.

Bank credit flow during April to August has shrunk over the same period a year ago, according to data from the Reserve Bank of India. This is despite the private-sector lenders such as HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank reporting double-digit growth in lending in the first quarter.

The overall fund flow into the economy grew by 10% in FY21 despite the pandemic. However, the incremental bank lending shrank 1.6% in FY21, while non-bank sources grew 30%.

Corporates reluctant

Banks are hoping for a lending spurt with the revival of capital expenditure, but it remains doubtful due to uncertainty over Covid.

Also, corporates are looking at cheaper avenues for funds. They raised Rs 1.8 lakh crore from the bond market this fiscal so far. Foreign direct investment and ECB have been also been strong, which has been bad news for banks. The buoyant equities market has seen corporates raising over Rs 1 lakh crore from the avenue during this fiscal till August.

In July

The total outstanding loans to large industries by the banking sector has shrunk for the 11th straight month in July 2021 as companies continue to deleverage and shift to cheaper options such as bonds. Most of the bank credit is driven by the retail and agri segments as sanctioned limits of corporates remain unutilised to the extent of 25%. The credit to large industries shrank 2.9% in July.

The credit growth in the last two months is being led by is led by MSMEs, agriculture and retail as corporate lending stays tepid.

PSU banks hit

The deleveraging has led to a drop in corporate loan demand for banks, especially PSU ones.

The domestic corporate loans by the State Bank of India fell 2.23 per cent to Rs 7,90,494 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2021, compared to Rs 8,09,322 crore in the same quarter last year. In the first quarter of FY21, SBI reported 3.41 per cent growth in corporate advances.

Union Bank of India‘s share of industry exposure in domestic advances dropped to 38.12 per cent at Rs 2,40,237 crore from 39.4 per cent at Rs 2,47,986 crore in the same quarter a year ago. Corporate loans dropped 3% at Indian Bank during the last quarter. At PNB, corporate loans fell 0.57 per cent at Rs 3,264,66 crore in June quarter 2021 compared to Rs 3,28,350 crore a year ago.

Retail front

Banks, which have been relying on the retail sector, are facing competition. Non-banking financial companies that were reeling after the collapse of IL&FS have bounced back and emerged out of the pandemic relatively less hurt. Banks are facing competition from fintech firms, which have made borrowing a seamlessly easy experience.

with the advent of account aggregators, transaction details of borrowers can be open to lender, which may lead to poaching of customers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

To purchase and simultaneously sale G-Secs on Sept 23: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Monday announced that will conduct open market purchase of Government Securities (G-Secs) under its “G-Sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP) 2.0” along with a simultaneous sale of G-Secs on September 23.

So far, under G-SAP, the RBI has only conducted standalone G-Sec purchases. But this time round, it is simultaneously conducting sale of G-Secs in view of ample liquidity in the banking system.

RBI will purchase three G-Secs of seven to 14 years tenor, aggregating ₹15,000 crore, under G-SAP 2.0 on September 23.

Simultaneously, the Central bank will sell three short-term G-Sec, all maturing in 2022, aggregating ₹15,000 crore.

In the second quarter so far, the RBI has bought G-Secs aggregating ₹90,000 crore in four G-SAP auctions. After the September 23rd G-SAP auction, it may conduct one more auction for ₹15,000 crore.

Marzban Irani, CIO-Fixed Income, LIC MF, said the simultaneous conduct of G-Sec purchase under G-SAP and sale of G-Sec will be liquidity neutral. However, it may push up short-term yields.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI deputy governor stresses on need to mainstream green finance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There is a need to mainstream green finance and devise ways for incorporating environment impact into commercial lending decisions, RBI deputy governor M Rajeshwar Rao has said.

Addressing climate risk in the financial sector should be the joint responsibility of stakeholders as it would affect the resilience of the financial system in the long run, he said.

Rao made these comments while speaking at the CAFRAL Virtual Conference on Green and Sustainable Finance) recently.

“As the risks and opportunities and financial impact arising from climate change vary across jurisdictions, this poses unique considerations for emerging economies like India.

“The challenge before us is to mainstream green finance and think of ways to incorporate the environmental impact into commercial lending decisions while simultaneously balancing the needs of credit expansion, economic growth and social development,” Rao said.

He noted that the global understanding of systemic impact of climate change on the economy and the financial system as also its resultant impact on financial stability is evolving and, accordingly, the responses of central banks and supervisors around the world have also been developing.

“The private and the public sector need to build on our early progress, both by recognising what we do know and urgently filling in the gaps around what we do not,” Rao said.

He further said the impact of climate risk transcends across the national borders and continents.

“Let us be aware that even the countries which are not major contributors will also be equally impacted by these risks. We all are in it together,” he said.

Climate-related financial risk refers to the risk assessment based on analysis of the likelihoods, consequences and responses to the impact of climate change.

Thus, climate-related financial risks may arise not just from climate change but also from efforts to mitigate these changes, Rao said.

A report of the ministry of earth sciences, government of India released last year concluded that since the middle of the 20th century, India has witnessed a rise in average temperature, a decrease in monsoon precipitation, a rise in extreme temperature, droughts, and sea levels, as well as increase in the intensity and frequency of severe cyclones.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 10 11 12 13 14 55