Voda Idea lenders fret over ‘too big to fail’ telco giant, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: A day after Kumar Mangalam Birla’s letter warning that Vodafone Idea (VIL) may reach an “irretrievable point of collapse” became public, banks are worried about the fate of the telecom major which, they say, is “too big to fail”.

Lenders, both Indian and global, have an exposure of Rs 1.8 lakh crore. A large part of this is in the form of guarantees. Some private lenders with a funded exposure have already started making provisions. However, the bulk of the exposure is to public sector banks.

If VIL fails to repay its dues to the government and these guarantees are invoked, it would immediately turn into debt and would soon be classified as a non-performing asset. The hit on public sector banks will not be as large as their exposure because in recent years, lenders have been demanding a substantially higher cash margin from Vodafone for their guarantees. IDBI Bank is understood to have up to 40% margins for the guarantees it has extended. But even then it will be large enough to wipe out profits for many.

For banks, recovery of debt is contingent on VIL remaining operational and retaining customers. While the company continues to have close to a fourth of the Indian market, its situation could change overnight if there is a default. According to bankers, the insolvency process can work only when there are buyers. In the case of VIL, the Rs 53,000-crore AGR (adjusted gross revenue) dues to the Centre are a deterrent. This is despite Birla being willing to write down his entire equity.

The government dues cannot be avoided as the Centre cannot make an exception for one company. Even in insolvency cases, the telecom department has claimed its dues to be that of a financial creditor although there have been attempts to mark them as operational creditors. The uncertainty over telecom department’s claims, which is already being experienced by lenders in the Reliance Communication insolvency case, would makes telecom resolutions a challenge. Lenders do not want to risk insolvency as this would result in the exit of customers which was the case with RCom.

Lenders say besides the company’s debt obligations being equal to 1.5% of the banking sector’s credit, VIL is a large telecom infrastructure provider. Several business applications run on their networks and the company is one of the largest providers of “internet of things” service. A bank executive said insolvency would be a worst-case scenario as there is a risk of customers migrating.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RCom bidding may be back to square one, haircut may exceed 65%, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Lenders of Reliance Communications are staring at lesser recovery prospects as they may have to go for fresh bidding.

They are worried that similar to the Aircel case, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is unlikely to permit asset reconstruction firm UVARCL buying RCom’s spectrum and other assets under a resolution plan.

The delay is rapidly eroding the value of the assets, especially spectrum, further depleting the amount the lenders were hoping to recover.

Aircel case

In the Aircel case, RBI denied UVARCL permission to buy Aircel’s assets for flouting norms under the Sarfaesi (Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest) Act. The RBI decision came even after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had approved the Aircel resolution plan.

According to the Sarfaesi Act, asset reconstruction companies cannot infuse equity into an insolvent company at the resolution stage.

The RCom resolution

RCom’s committee of creditors (CoC) cleared the resolution plan in March 2020, which would have seen UVARCL buy all assets, including spectrum, under RCom and Reliance Telecom, while a Reliance Jio unit was to buy the company’s towers housed under Reliance Infratel.

The plans were filed in the NCLT a few days later.

While the NCLT has cleared the tower sale to Jio, it has not cleared the transfer of the other assets to UVARCL yet. The tower sale, though, has not yet been implemented, with Jio recently approaching the NCLT with fresh concerns. RCom had filed for bankruptcy in 2019.

Under the resolution plan, UVARCL is expected to pick up RCom’s spectrum for Rs 12,760 crore, with the total recovery expected to be in the Rs 20,000-23,000 crore range against claims of Rs 57,382 crore, a roughly 65% haircut for lenders. Jio is to buy the towers for nearly Rs 5,000 crore.

Recovery worries

The IBC process has recently come under criticism after high-profile accounts such as Videocon were sold for near liquidation value and settlement in the case of Siva Industries yielded pittance.

The realisation for financial creditors from IBC declined significantly in FY2021 with a total resolution amount of around Rs 26,000 crore, almost a quarter of the realisations in fiscal 2020.

The pandemic has increased operational challenges for the various parties involved in a CIRP, which resulted in limited cases yielding a resolution plan. The suspension of new proceedings under the IBC for the entire FY21 resulted in a sharp slowdown in the resolution process.

Out of the total 4,300 cases that have been admitted to bankruptcy courts since FY17, only 8% has been resolved and nearly 40% of the cases are still pending. About 30% of the cases have seen liquidation.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY