Unwise to place a ban on private crypto assets: Report

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cryptocurrencies have witnessed exponential growth over the last five years with more than 15 million Indian investors and as a result, like any other financial asset, the asset class needs to be regulated to protect consumer welfare as well as promote innovation, said a report jointly published by Esya Centre and Observer Research Foundation.

The report highlights that crypto assets are likely to form the basis for future forms of the internet and that India is well placed to capitalise on this due to its burgeoning private crypto market. Given this, it would be unwise to place a ban on private crypto assets as these can result in significant revenue loss to the government and force nascent industries to operate illegally.

Instead, the report advocates a balanced regulatory approach that addresses concerns of fiscal stability, money laundering, investor protection and regulatory certainty while preserving innovation.

According to one of the authors, Meghna Bal, “Most regulatory formulae necessary to address the policy concerns related to crypto-assets, such as investor protection, foreign exchange management, money-laundering and tax evasion, already exist in financial legislation. They just have to be adapted to accommodate an emerging technological paradigm. The recommendations in our report show how this can be done. ”

In India, classifying crypto as a security, good or capital asset could lead to unintended restrictions on investment or leave regulatory gaps in key policy areas. A sui generis crypto framework that adopts the nuances of the crypto industry would be more appropriate and in keeping with emerging global trends.

Suggestions for lawmakers

The report also lays out suggestions for lawmakers on what a crypto regulatory framework should include: it must be technology neutral, innovation friendly and consistent to fully harness India’s potential in this domain. Among other things, the framework must lay down clear definitions, identify the relevant regulatory bodies and create KYC/anti-money laundering obligations, the report says. It should also provide crypto asset service providers with safe harbor – protection from liability for the actions of investors on their platform. This will help asset service providers innovate and scale new crypto-based products and offerings.

The report also recommends the government adopt a co-regulatory approach where industry associations and authorities such as SEBI, the RBI, and the Ministry of Finance share responsibility for oversight. Such an approach takes a leaf out of Japan’s book, where authorities have tasked industry associations to enforce regulations. The report also recommends incentivising industry whistleblowing so that players within the crypto-market work to keep a check on each other’s activities.

Such a facilitative regulatory framework will boost the growth of India’s crypto ecosystem while addressing any possible harms to consumers and society at large, the report says.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Cryptocurrency firms say no plan B as of now

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Most cryptocurrency companies in India are closely following developments around the proposed legislation on cyptocurrency but at present don’t have a plan B in case of a complete ban on trading.

“As an industry, we are in sync with the fact that INR is the only legal tender in India and crypto is an asset or utility which people buy and sell.

“If tabled in the Parliament, there will be discussions and deliberations around this bill. The process of crypto regulation is in the works, and we need to have faith in our lawmakers,” said Nischal Shetty, Founder, WazirX.

Regulation over prohibition

Gaurav Dahake, CEO and Co- founder, Bitbns, also expressed confidence that the government will embrace regulations instead of prohibitions.

“We are not putting in any efforts for any kind of alternate plans as we believe that all these speculations are initial hiccups before the whole cryptocurrency ecosystem gets regulated. Well-appraised regulations and a more defined framework will work better in favour of the economy than a ban,” he said.

Also see: 50,000 jobs at stake as govt brings laws to regulate cryptocurrencies

Experts said most cryptocurrency companies are incorporated overseas and will be able to continue operations abroad. However, a ban would lead to immediate losses and at least some would have to transfer operations abroad.

“Businesses in and around crypto assets may transfer their operations offshore but an immediate ban would definitely lead to some losses,” said Rashmi Deshpande, Partner, Khaitan & Co.

Blockchain: Part of Web 3.0

Many cryptocurrency companies also work on blockchain technology apart from trading.

“CrossTower is more than just a crypto platform. Crypto is a part of blockchain and blockchain is part of Web 3.0. We are focused on blockchain technology and innovation around Web 3.0, the next revolution in internet technology,” said Vikas Ahuja, CEO of CrossTower India.

Based in the US, CrossTower has users in the US, India, and other over 70 countries.

“When the Indian government is talking about banning certain cryptocurrencies, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re banning this giant game of blockchain or interrupting the next level of innovation on digitising the trading world for the country.

“We believe they are trying to make it safe for consumers by providing safeguards, which is the best thing for crypto trading in India to grow smartly,” Ahuja said.

RBI’s digital currency

According to industry sources, many of these cryptocurrency companies had moved overseas after the 2018 restriction by the Reserve Bank of India.

The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, has been listed as part of the Government Legislative and Financial Business that will be taken up at the Winter Session of Parliament.

Also see: A sudden and complete ban on crypto trading unlikely: Experts

The Bill seeks to create a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

The Bill also seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India. However, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of cryptocurrency and its uses.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Paytm up 17%, Central Bank, IOB gain from selloff hopes, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Indian Overseas Bank and Central Bank were among the top gainers in the stock exchanges on Wednesday after investors speculated that these might be the two banks lined up by the government for divestment. Meanwhile, Paytm shares continued on their road to recovery, gaining 17% on Wednesday to end at Rs 1,753, but still remain 18% below their issue price of Rs 2,150. This was despite the broader sensex falling 323 points to 58,341.

The government on Tuesday released the list of bills that it will seek to pass in the winter session of Parliament. Among them is the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill 2021. This bill describes the need for amendments in the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 and 1980. In addition to this, there are some amendments needed in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The privatisation of two public sector banks was announced in the Union Budget for 2021-22 by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman. The banks’ disinvestment, along with that of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, was expected to fetch Rs 1.75 lakh crore for the government.

Shares of Indian Overseas Bank opened at Rs 22 and touched the day’s high of Rs 23.8 before closing 13% higher at Rs 22.5. At the current price, the bank’s market capitalisation is Rs 42,436 crore. Shares of Central Bank opened at just under Rs 23 and touched a high of Rs 23.7 before closing over 10% up at Rs 22.7. The bank currently has an mcap of Rs 19,706 crore.

Paytm shares saw reduced volatility on Wednesday on the back of what appeared to be buying interest from institutional investors. Shares had fallen 35% in the first two days of trade, but found support at lower levels later. At the current price, the payment giant is valued at nearly Rs 1.14 lakh crore — more than Nykaa (Rs 1.06 lakh crore) but still behind Zomato (Rs 1.22 lakh crore).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Crypto crowdfunding goes mainstream with ConstitutionDAO bid

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A loosely-organised group of investors made casual and even some long-time observers of the crypto world wonder what’s a DAO, or decentralised autonomous organisation, after they mounted a crowdfunding-like campaign to buy a rare copy of the US Constitution.

While the bid from the project known as ConstitutionDAO fell short at a Sotheby’s auction on Thursday, the effort showed the power of the DAO, and how the idea has the potential to change the way people buy things, build companies, share resources and run non-profits. The Ethereum-based project ended up raising $46.3 million from thousands of donors, one of the largest amounts ever through the process.

Crypto investing: Beware of traps laid by cybercriminals, warn experts

Here’s how the community-owned blockchain projects work and some of the questions being raised.

In a traditional company, a CEO and management typically make all decisions. In a DAO, thousands or even millions of people can be involved in deciding on product features, strategy and fees. Their votes are counted, and they impact what the project’s funds go toward.

Developers, investors and users first often have to put some money or work into a project to get special digital tokens, with which they can vote, and which are often available for sale on crypto exchanges. A share of the tokens issued is also usually put into the project’s treasury. That treasury is governed by a smart contract — a piece of software that sits on a blockchain, a digital ledger similar to that underpinning Bitcoin. The smart contract only allocates funds to efforts approved by the token holders. No one can access the treasury without the approval of the group.

Barcelona, Manchester City drop club crypto sponsors amid concerns

The smart contract can also let participants make operational decisions. In the case of ConstitutionDAO, contributors were promised a governance token with which they could have voted on where the constitution would be displayed.

Unsurprisingly, it turns out that users are more loyal to projects that reward them with governance tokens. The tokens often have various additional incentives baked in. Holders of tokens of decentralised exchange dYdX, for example, get discounts on trades. Users can also make the project more agile.

Centralised or traditional organisations “can be slow to change and have difficulty scaling and resolving multiple goals,” said Aaron Brown, a crypto investor who writes for Bloomberg Opinion. “Decentralised organisations can be much more flexible and innovative, self-interested people have more difficulty co-opting them.”

More expensive

Over the years, DAOs have been created to run venture funds, distribute money to non-profits, and lend and borrow digital coins while earning interest via decentralised-finance, or DeFi apps. In one of the best-known examples, PleasrDAO paid $4 million in July for a copy of a single-issue Wu-Tang Clan album once owned by Martin Shkreli.

To be sure, investing in a DAO can end up being more expensive than it initially seems. A median donation to ConstitutionDAO was $206.26. To process the donation, many investors likely paid a substantial amount in so-called gas fees to complete the transaction. With the bid lost, ConstitutionDAO will need to send the funds back, minus gas fees needed to process the reimbursement. As a result, many small investors could end up losing half or more of the funds contributed. That’s why many DAOs are now being set up on newer networks such as Solana, in part because the transaction fees are so high on Ethereum.

No matter the ownership structure, DAO projects have to abide by existing laws and regulations — and, in many cases, may need to register with authorities.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

All that is dubious about crypto currencies

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It is quite timely that the government and regulators are looking closely at cryptocurrency. The interesting part is that it does not come under SCRA and hence SEBI is not involved. It does not involve financial institutions and hence RBI is out. It has not been declared illegal by the Courts and hence the government cannot do anything as of now. It is a unique fad because it is prevalent across the world and more importantly it trades without there being any underlying value.

Crypto is a creation of the imagination which is protected by technology and brought on to several platforms which enables trading. Anyone can start their own crypto, but multitude of people need to believe in it and start trading. Not surprisingly even though there are over 7,000 such currencies not more than 10 are actively traded and command value. Clearly lots of people have tried floating their imaginary currencies and have failed. It runs on belief and trust with no regulators to lay down the rules.

Two things stand out here which needs to be answered by regulators.

First, is whether it is being used as a mode of transaction. Currently there is no information if people are buying and selling property and paying partly in crypto currency. If such things are happening, then it is something the RBI should be concerned about, because we cannot have parallel currencies in the country. It is illegal to carry out transactions in foreign currency in India and while barter exists in some pockets it is not the rule. If a crypto is allowed to become a currency for transactions, then it will undermine monetary policy and the entire system of payments will go for a toss. And finally in case there is a crash in value, the investors will lose money for which there is no recourse.

Also, there is need to know more on how these transactions take place. There are exchanges which allow one to trade; and it is still unclear whether the transactions are in rupees and remain in this currency or get converted to dollars. If it is in rupees and mimics what happens to the crypto globally then it is not serious, but if there are conversions into dollars then there would be a FEMA rule to contend with.

The exchanges which promote trading in crypto are transparent in terms of doing a KYC of all players. This aspect needs to be clear because if there is conversion into dollars at any stage it needs to be within the guidelines put by the RBI.

Investment option

The second aspect is the investment option. If cryptos are being used as an investment option by people, then the nature of debate changes. The exchanges vouch that there is KYC done for every customer and that all taxes are paid on the gains. It is still not clear if the gains come under short or long term and the I-T Department will have to decide on this issue.

The broader issue is that if one can trade in imaginary currencies it does tantamount to gambling which is partly permitted in the country. Horse racing and the bets that go along with this avocation is legitimate as are lotteries. Casinos can operate in some States. If trading in cryptos fall in this category, then as an extension it can be argued that people should be allowed to gamble on cricket matches too and there should be a level playing field.

Therefore, there is need to do a deep dive analysis into this entire issue of crypto currency as the level of interest is high and increasing. Part of the reason is that people want to make quick money and the present avenues of savings — bank deposits which give a paltry return — makes these alternatives alluring. Allowing such investments also risks savings getting diverted for speculative purposes which is not good for an economy which normally has a big gap in savings and investments.

Besides people investing should know what they are up against. SEBI runs strong campaigns along with the stock exchanges to caution investors on trading as well as investing in mutual funds which all have ‘underlying’ products like shares, commodities or bonds. For something fictional, people need to know what they are up against, because when there is a crash there can be an issue. The price of bitcoin had risen from $8,527 on March 1, 2020 to a high of $62,986 on April 15, 2021 and then fell to $30,822 on July 20, 2021. It again crossed $67,000 on November 9. Intuitively it can be seen that there would be several gainers and losers in this game and those who are in the latter category could be the ones who have been lured by the lucre.

Threat for central banks

Globally this has become a wave which cannot be stopped. Some states in the US accept bitcoins for transactions as do some of the Nordic countries. It is not a good precedent for central banks which will see their power over monetary policy getting denuded. Interestingly, the concept of crypto emerged on the premise that central banks and governments mismanage money and make them worthless with loose policies. This made the concept of bitcoin enticing driving its popularity.

The fear of a backlash at some point of time is palpable and this concept can be likened to a Frankenstein which may be hard to push back once it grows roots in the system. Ideally a call should be taken for sure to make it illegal for transactions as this strikes the edifice of not just the financial system but also monetary policy. On whether it should be allowed as a form of gambling, there can be further debate.

The government need not be concerned over people who are aware of the downside of cryptos, but the less financially literate need to be educated just as it is done for sin products. Maybe a bold print saying ‘trading in crypto can be bad for your financial health’ can be the beginning.

The writer is an independent economist and author of: Hits & Misses: The Indian Banking Story. Views expressed are personal

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bill to regulate cryptocurrencies likely to be delayed

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Government on Wednesday indicated that a bill to regulate cryptocurrencies may be delayed. However, it said the effort is on to bring the bill during the current session itself.

“5-6 key bills related to Finance Ministry are in the queue. We may or may not be able to bring the crypto bill during the session,” a top government official told reporters here. On the eve of the budget session, the Lok Sabha bulletin published list of 20 bills to be introduced during the session. One such bill is “The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021.”

The bill aims “To create a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India. The Bill also seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India; however, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of crytptocurrency and its uses,” purport of the bill as mentioned in Lok Sabha bulletin said.

 

The bill appears to be based on a recommendation given by SC Garg Committee formed by the Centre. The Committee had recommended banning cryptocurrencies and allow an official digital currency. At this moment, and especially after a Supreme Court verdict, one can buy and sell virtual currency, but there is no legal framework, available making it riskier.

The intent to bring a bill caused a debate, especially when bitcoin first touched $50000, then $55000 and now $61000. Considering India’s interest, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has already put it on record that India is not shutting off all options when it comes to cryptocurrency or blockchain and fintech. On Wednesday, the official quoted above reiterated the stand.

This raised investors’ hopes that the authorities might go easier on the booming market. However, another official clarified that the bill would give holders of cryptocurrencies up to six months to liquidate, after which penalties will be levied,

Last week, in response to a question in Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Finance Anurag Singh Thakur had said that the regulatory bodies like the RBI, SEBI, etc., don’t have any legal framework to directly regulate cryptocurrencies as they are neither currencies nor assets nor securities nor commodities issued by identifiable users. The existing laws are inadequate to deal with the subject.

The Government formed an Inter-Ministerial Committee, which has given its report. Then there was a meeting of the Empowered Technology Group. Then the Committee of Secretaries chaired by the Cabinet Secretary has also given its report. “The Bill is being finalised, and it will soon be sent to the Cabinet. We will soon be bringing a Bill,” he had said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY