Finmin looks at BIC model after RBI raises concern over zero coupon bonds for PSBs recap, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the RBI raising concern over the issuance of zero coupon bonds for recapitalisation of public sector banks (PSBs), the Finance Ministry is examining other avenues for affordable capital infusion including setting up of a Bank Investment Company (BIC), sources said. Setting up a BIC as a holding company or a core investment company was suggested by the P J Nayak Committee in its report on ‘Governance of Boards of Banks in India’.

The report recommended transferring shares of the government in the banks to the BIC which would become the parent holding company of all these banks, as a result of this, all the PSBs would become ‘limited’ banks. BIC will be autonomous and it will have the power to appoint the board of directors and make other policy decisions about subsidiaries.

The idea of BIC, which will serve as a super holding company, was also discussed at the first Gyan Sangam bankers’ retreat organised in 2014, sources said, adding it was proposed that the holding company would look into the capital needs of banks and arrange funds for them without government support.

It would also look at alternative ways of raising capital such as the sale of non-voting shares in a bid to garner affordable capital.

With this in place, the dependence of PSBs on government support would also come down and ease fiscal pressure.

To save interest burden and ease the fiscal pressure, the government decided to issue zero-coupon bonds for meeting the capital needs of the banks.

The first test case of the new mechanism was a capital infusion of Rs 5,500 crore into Punjab & Sind Bank by issuing zero-coupon bonds of six different maturities last year. These special securities with tenure of 10-15 years are non-interest bearing and valued at par.

However, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) expressed concerns over zero-coupon bonds for the recapitalisation of PSBs.

The RBI has raised some issues with regard to calculation of an effective capital infusion made in any bank through this instrument issued at par, the sources said.

Since such bonds usually are non-interest bearing but issued at a deep discount to the face value, it is difficult to ascertain net present value, they added.

As these special bonds are non-interest bearing and issued at par to a bank, it would be an investment, which would not earn any return but rather depreciate with each passing year.

Parliament had in September 2020 approved Rs 20,000 crore to be made available for the recapitalisation of PSBs. Of this, Rs 5,500 crore was issued to Punjab & Sind Bank and the Finance Ministry will take a call on the remaining Rs 14,500 crore during this quarter.

With mounting capital requirement owing to rising NPAs, the government resorted to recapitalisation bonds with a coupon rate for capital infusion into PSBs during 2017-18 and interest payment to banks for holding such bonds started from the next financial year.

This mechanism helped the government from making capital infusion from its own resources rather utilised banks’ money for the financial assistance.

However, the mechanism had a cost of interest payment towards the recapitalisation bonds for PSBs. During 2018-19, the government paid Rs 5,800.55 crore as interest on such bonds issued to public sector banks for pumping in the capital so that they could meet the regulatory norms under the Basel-III guidelines.

In the subsequent year, according to the official document, the interest payment by the government surged three times to Rs 16,285.99 crore to PSBs as they have been holding these papers.

Under this mechanism, the government issues recapitalisation bonds to a public sector bank which needs capital. The said bank subscribes to the paper against which the government receives the money. Now, the money received goes as equity capital of the bank.

So the government doesn’t have to pay anything from its pocket. However, the money invested by banks in recapitalisation bonds is classified as an investment which earns them an interest.

In all, the government has issued about Rs 2.5 lakh crore recapitalisation in the last three financial years. In the first year, the government issued Rs 80,000 crore recapitalisation bonds, followed by Rs 1.06 lakh crore in 2018-19. During the last financial year, the capital infusion through bonds was Rs 65,443 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI for more measures to improve governance at banks, NBFCs: Shaktikanta Das

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Any discussion on a bad bank must happen between the government and private players, and the RBI will consider such a proposal once presented with it, he said in response to a question at the Nani Palkhivala memorial lecture.

Integrity and quality of governance are key to good health and robustness of banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das said on Saturday, adding that the regulator plans to issue some more measures on improving governance at regulated institutions. Any discussion on a bad bank must happen between the government and private players, and the RBI will consider such a proposal once presented with it, he said in response to a question at the Nani Palkhivala memorial lecture.

Recent events in the rapidly evolving financial landscape have led to increasing scrutiny of the role of promoters, major shareholders and senior management vis-à-vis the role of the board and the RBI is constantly focused on strengthening the related regulations and deepening its supervision of financial entities, he said.

“A good governance structure will have to be supported by effective risk management, compliance functions and assurance mechanisms.”

“These constitute the first line of defence in matters relating to financial sector stability,” Das said, adding that the central bank is set to beef up the governance framework. “Some more measures on improving governance in banks and NBFCs are in the pipeline,” he said.

Das pointed to the measures the RBI has taken to strengthen its supervisory framework over regulated entities. The supervisory functions pertaining to the scheduled commercial banks (SCB), urban cooperative bank (UCB) and NBFC sectors are now integrated, with the objective of harmonising the supervisory approach. It has developed a system for early identification of vulnerabilities to facilitate timely and proactive action. It has also been deploying advances in data analytics to offsite returns so as to provide sharper and more comprehensive inputs to the onsite supervisory teams. “The thrust of the Reserve Bank’s supervision is now more on root causes of vulnerabilities rather than dealing with symptoms,” the governor said.

Going ahead, financial institutions in India have to walk a tightrope in nurturing the economic recovery within the overarching objective of preserving long-term stability of the financial system, he said. The pandemic-related shock will place greater pressure on the balance sheets of banks in terms of non-performing assets, leading to erosion of capital. Building buffers and raising capital by banks – both in the public and private sector – will be crucial not only to ensure credit flow but also to build resilience in the financial system. “Preliminary estimates suggest that potential recapitalisation requirements for meeting regulatory norms as well as for supporting growth capital may be to the extent of 150 bps (basis points) of common equity tier-I capital ratio for the banking system,” Das said.

While abundant capital inflows have been largely driven by accommodative global liquidity conditions and India’s optimistic medium-term growth outlook, domestic financial markets must remain prepared for sudden stops and reversals, should the global risk aversion factors take hold. “Under uncertain global economic environment, EMEs (emerging market economies) typically remain at the receiving end. In order to mitigate global spillovers, they have no recourse but to build their own forex reserve buffers, even though at the cost of being included in currency manipulators list or monitoring list of the US Treasury,” Das said, adding that the issue needs greater understanding on both sides so that EMEs can actively use policy tools to overcome challenges pertaining to capital flows.

The governor made a case for defining fiscal roadmaps not only in terms of quantitative parameters like fiscal balance to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio or debt to GDP ratio, but also in terms of measurable parameters relating to quality of expenditure, both for the Centre and states. While the conventional parameters of fiscal discipline will ensure medium and long-term sustainability of public finances, measurable parameters of quality of expenditure would ensure that welfarism carries significant productive outcomes and multiplier effects. Maintaining and improving the quality of expenditure would help address the objectives of fiscal sustainability while supporting growth, Das said.

On the subject of a bad bank, he said the idea has been under discussion for a very long time. “We in the RBI have provided regulatory guidelines for asset reconstruction companies and we are open to look at any proposal for setting up a bad bank. If any proposal comes, we are open to examining it and issuing regulatory guidelines, but then it’s for the government and private-sector players to really plan for it,” Das said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finmin looks at BIC model after RBI raises concern over zero coupon bonds for PSBs recap

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the RBI raising concern over the issuance of zero coupon bonds for recapitalisation of public sector banks (PSBs), the Finance Ministry is examining other avenues for affordable capital infusion including setting up of a Bank Investment Company (BIC), sources said.

Setting up a BIC as a holding company or a core investment company was suggested by the P J Nayak Committee in its report on ‘Governance of Boards of Banks in India’.

The report recommended transferring shares of the government in the banks to the BIC which would become the parent holding company of all these banks, as a result of this, all the PSBs would become ‘limited’ banks. BIC will be autonomous and it will have the power to appoint the board of directors and make other policy decisions about subsidiaries.

Capital infusion

The idea of BIC, which will serve as a super holding company, was also discussed at the first Gyan Sangam bankers’ retreat organised in 2014, sources said, adding it was proposed that the holding company would look into the capital needs of banks and arrange funds for them without government support.

It would also look at alternative ways of raising capital such as the sale of non-voting shares in a bid to garner affordable capital.

With this in place, the dependence of PSBs on government support would also come down and ease fiscal pressure.

To save interest burden and ease the fiscal pressure, the government decided to issue zero-coupon bonds for meeting the capital needs of the banks.

The first test case of the new mechanism was a capital infusion of ₹ 5,500 crore into Punjab & Sind Bank by issuing zero-coupon bonds of six different maturities last year. These special securities with tenure of 10-15 years are non-interest bearing and valued at par.

However, the RBI expressed concerns over zero-coupon bonds for the recapitalisation of PSBs. The RBI has raised some issues with regard to calculation of an effective capital infusion made in any bank through this instrument issued at par, the sources said.

Since such bonds usually are non-interest bearing but issued at a deep discount to the face value, it is difficult to ascertain net present value, they added.

As these special bonds are non-interest bearing and issued at par to a bank, it would be an investment, which would not earn any return but rather depreciate with each passing year.

Parliament had in September 2020 approved ₹ 20,000 crore to be made available for the recapitalisation of PSBs. Of this, ₹ 5,500 crore was issued to Punjab & Sind Bank and the Finance Ministry will take a call on the remaining ₹ 14,500 crore during this quarter.

Recapitalisation bonds

With mounting capital requirement owing to rising NPAs, the government resorted to recapitalisation bonds with a coupon rate for capital infusion into PSBs during 2017-18 and interest payment to banks for holding such bonds started from the next financial year.

This mechanism helped the government from making capital infusion from its own resources rather utilised banks’ money for the financial assistance.

However, the mechanism had a cost of interest payment towards the recapitalisation bonds for PSBs. During 2018-19, the government paid ₹ 5,800.55 crore as interest on such bonds issued to public sector banks for pumping in the capital so that they could meet the regulatory norms under the Basel-III guidelines.

In the subsequent year, according to the official document, the interest payment by the government surged three times to ₹ 16,285.99 crore to PSBs as they have been holding these papers.

Under this mechanism, the government issues recapitalisation bonds to a public sector bank which needs capital. The said bank subscribes to the paper against which the government receives the money. Now, the money received goes as equity capital of the bank.

So the government doesn’t have to pay anything from its pocket. However, the money invested by banks in recapitalisation bonds is classified as an investment which earns them an interest.

In all, the government has issued about ₹ 2.5 lakh crore recapitalisation in the last three financial years. In the first year, the government issued ₹ 80,000 crore recapitalisation bonds, followed by ₹ 1.06 lakh crore in 2018-19. During the last financial year, the capital infusion through bonds was ₹ 65,443 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI open to examining bad bank proposal, says Shaktikanta Das; wants lenders to identify risks early

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The RBI Governor said that the idea of a bad bank has been under discussion for a long time.

Reserve Bank of India Governor Shaktikanta Das today said that the central bank is open to looking at a proposal around setting up a bad bank. “Bad bank under discussion for a long time. We at RBI have regulatory guidelines for Asset reconstruction companies and are open to looking at any proposal to set up a bad bank,” Shaktikanta Das said while delivering the 39th Nani Palkhivala Memorial Lecture on Saturday. Das touched up on a range of issue during the event as he lauded the role played by the RBI during a pandemic.

Bad Bank for India?

The RBI Governor said that the idea of a bad bank has been under discussion for a long time now but added that the RBI tries to keep its regulatory framework in sync with the requirement of the times. “We are open (to look at bad bank proposal) in the sense, if any proposal comes we will examining it and issuing the regulatory guidelines. But, then it is for the government and the private players to plan for it,” Das said. He added that RBI will only take a view on any proposal only after examining it. 

Also Read: Rakesh Jhunjhunwala on selling spree; big bull cuts stake in Titan among other stocks

The Idea of setting up a bad bank to help the banking system of the country has picked up after Economic Affairs Secretary, Tarun Bajaj earlier last month, said that the government is exploring all options, including a bad bad, to help the health of the lenders in the country. However, earlier in June last year, Chief Economic Advisor Krishnamurthy Subramanian had opined that setting up a bad bank may not be a potent option to address the NPA woes in the banking sector.

Discussion the idea of bad banks, domestic brokerage and research firm Kotak Securities this week said that it may be an idea whose time has passed. “Today, the banking system is relatively more solid with slippages declining in the corporate segment for the past two years and high NPL coverage ratios, which enable faster resolution. Establishing a bad bank today would aggregate but not serve the purpose that we have observed in other markets,” a recent report by Kotak Securities said.

Banks, NBFCs need to identify risks early

Looking ahead, Shaktikanta Das said that integrity and quality of governance are key to good health and robustness of banks and NBFCs. “Some of the integral elements of the risk management framework of banks would include effective early warning systems and a forward-looking stress testing framework. Banks and NBFCs need to identify risks early, monitor them closely and manage them effectively,” he added.

Talking about recapitalising banks, the RBI governor said that financial institutions in India have to walk on a tight rope. The RBI has advised all lenders, to assess the impact of the pandemic on their balance sheets and work out possible mitigation measures including capital planning, capital raising, and contingency liquidity planning, among others. “Preliminary estimates suggest that potential recapitalisation requirements for meeting regulatory norms as well as for supporting growth capital may be to the extent of 150 bps of Common Equity Tier-I 10 capital ratio for the banking system,” Shaktikanta Das said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI’s FSDC panel reviews insolvency resolution under IBC

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Sub-Committee of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC) on Wednesday discussed the scope for improvements in insolvency resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and utilisation of data with the Central KYC (know your customer) Records Registry.

The Sub-Committee, chaired by Governor Shaktikanta Das, also discussed changes in the regulatory framework relating to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) set up in the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC), among others, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said in a statement.

It reviewed the functioning of State Level Coordination Committees (SLCCs) in various states/UTs.

“The regulators reaffirmed their resolve to be alert and watchful of emerging challenges to financial stability,” RBI said in a statement.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes Rs 2 cr penalty on Deutsche Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank on Tuesday imposed a penalty of Rs 2 crore on Deutsche Bank AG for non-compliance with certain provisions of directions concerning interest rate on deposits. The central bank said the statutory inspection of Deutsche Bank‘s financial position as on March 31, 2019 and the Risk Assessment Report revealed non-compliance with the ‘Reserve Bank of India (Interest Rate on Deposits) Directions, 2016′.

Following the inspection, the RBI issued a show cause notice to the bank.

“After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, oral submissions made in the personal hearing and examination of additional submissions, RBI concluded that the charge of non-compliance with aforesaid RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty,” the central bank said.

Therefore, RBI by an order on Tuesday imposed a penalty of Rs 2 crore on Deutsche Bank AG.

The action, the RBI added, was based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and was not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI FSR, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks‘ gross non-performing assets may rise to 13.5% by September 2021, from 7.5% in September 2020 under the baseline scenario, according to the Financial Stability Report (FSR) released by the Reserve Bank of India. The GNPA ratio of PSBs may increase from 9.7% in September 2020 to 16.2% by September 2021; that of PVBs (private banks) to 7.9% from 4.6% in 2020; and FBs’ (foreign banks) from 2.5% to 5.4%, over the same period. Under the baseline scenario, it would be a 23-year-high. The last time banks witnessed such NPAs was in 1996-97 at 15.7%, showed the RBI data.

These projections are indicative of the possible economic impairment latent in banks’ portfolios, with implications for capital planning, noted the report.

“While the RBI has strongly cautioned about a likely surge in NPAs in the coming months, it may not be a surprise given the current economic scenario. Banks that maintain high CRAR should be on a distinctly better footing. Meanwhile, the signs of tapering in fresh Covid-19 infections, and positive developments on the development of vaccines can help faster normalisation of economic activities. Also, it is heartening to note that the RBI remains committed to nurture growth recovery,” said Siddhartha Sanyal, Chief Economist and Head of Research, Bandhan Bank.

In case of severe stress scenario, the GNPA ratios of PSBs, PVBs and FBs may rise to 17.6%, 8.8% and 6.5%, respectively, by September 2021. The GNPA ratio of all SCBs may escalate to 14.8%. This highlights the need for proactive building up of adequate capital to withstand possible asset quality deterioration, said the report.

Stress tests gauge the adequacy of capital and liquidity buffers with financial institutions to withstand severe but plausible macroeconomic and financial conditions. In the face of a black swan event such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to tweak regular stress testing frameworks to accommodate the features of the pandemic.

“In view of the regulatory forbearances such as the moratorium, the standstill on asset classification and restructuring allowed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the data on fresh loan impairments reported by banks may not be reflective of the true underlying state of banks’ portfolios. This, in turn, can underestimate the impact of stress tests, given that the slippage ratios of the latest quarter for which data is available are the basic building blocks of the macro-stress testing framework. To tide over this limitation, it is necessary to arrive at reliable estimates of slippage ratios for the last three quarters, while controlling for the impact of regulatory forbearances,” the report said.

The stress tests results also indicated that four banks might fail to meet the minimum capital level by September 2021 under the baseline scenario, without factoring in any capital infusion by stakeholders. In the severe stress scenario, the number of banks failing to meet the minimum capital level may rise to nine

At the aggregate level, banks have sufficient capital cushions, even in the severe stress scenario facilitated by capital raising from the market and, in case of PSBs, infusion by the Government. At the individual level, however, the capital buffers of several banks may deplete below the regulatory minimum.

Hence going forward, mitigating actions such as phase-wise capital infusions or other strategic actions would become relevant for these banks from a micro-prudential perspective, the report stated.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI raises concerns over zero-coupon bond for PSB recapitalisation

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has expressed some concerns over zero-coupon bonds for the recapitalisation of public sector banks (PSBs) and discussion is on between the central bank and Finance Ministry to find a solution, according to sources.

The government resorted to recapitalisation bonds with a coupon rate for capital infusion into PSBs during 2017-18 and interest payment to banks for holding such bonds started from the next financial year.

To save interest burden and ease the fiscal pressure, the government has decided to issue zero-coupon bonds for meeting the capital needs of the banks.

The first test case of the new mechanism was a capital infusion of Rs 5,500 crore into Punjab & Sind Bank by issuing zero-coupon bonds of six different maturities last year. These special securities with tenure of 10-15 years are non-interest bearing and valued at par.

However, the RBI has raised some issues with regard to calculation of an effective capital infusion made in any bank through this instrument issued at par, the sources said.

Zero-coupon bond

Since such bonds usually are non-interest bearing but issued at a deep discount to the face value, it is difficult to ascertain net present value, they added.

The discount calculation may vary, which could lead to accounting adjustment, the sources said, adding both the Finance Ministry and RBI are in discussion to resolve the issue.

As these special bonds are non-interest bearing and issued at par to a bank, it would be an investment, which would not earn any return but rather depreciate with each passing year.

Parliament had in September 2020 approved Rs 20,000 crore to be made available for the recapitalisation of PSBs. Of this, Rs 5,500 crore was issued to Punjab & Sind Bank and the Finance Ministry will take a call on the remaining Rs 14,500 crore during this quarter.

This innovative mechanism will help ease the financial burden as the government has already spent Rs 22,086.54 crore as interest payment towards the recapitalisation bonds for PSBs in the last two financial years.

During 2018-19, the government paid Rs 5,800.55 crore as interest on such bonds issued to public sector banks for pumping in the capital so that they could meet the regulatory norms under the Basel-III guidelines.

In the subsequent year, according to the official document, the interest payment by the government surged three times to Rs 16,285.99 crore to PSBs as they have been holding these papers.

Under this mechanism, the government issues recapitalisation bonds to a public sector bank which needs capital. The said bank subscribes to the paper against which the government receives the money. Now, the money received goes as equity capital of the bank.

So the government doesn’t have to pay anything from its pocket. However, the money invested by banks in recapitalisation bonds is classified as an investment which earns them an interest.

In all, the government has issued about Rs 2.5 lakh crore recapitalisation in the last three financial years. In the first year, the government issued Rs 80,000 crore recapitalisation bonds, followed by Rs 1.06 lakh crore in 2018-19. During the last financial year, the capital infusion through bonds was Rs 65,443 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI approves re-appointment of Vishakha Mulye as ICICI Bank ED

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has approved the re-appointment of Vishakha Mulye as an Executive Director of the ICICI Bank for a three-year period.

The re-appointment is effective January 19, ICICI Bank said in a regulatory filing.

“…Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on August 14, 2020 had already approved the re-appointment of Ms Mulye for a period of five years effective January 19, 2021,” it further said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI weighs trade credit insurance for financiers on TReDS

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India is weighing the possibility of allowing financiers on the Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS) to take trade credit insurance (TCI).

This insurance cover can protect financiers– Banks, Non-Banking Finance Companies- Factors, and other financial institutions — on TReDS platform against the risk of default when they finance/discount trade receivables of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs).

TCI, if allowed, can help financiers on TReDs to minimise bad debts and reduce provisions, thereby supporting their bottomline.

The current regulations do not allow financiers to take TCI as the expectation is that their financing activity should be solely based on their credit appraisal and not on insurance.

TCI is currently offered by general insurers to suppliers of goods and services against delay in payment or non-payment of trade credit.

TReDS is an electronic platform for facilitating the financing/discounting of trade receivables of MSMEs drawn against buyers (large corporates, public sector undertaking companies, and government departments) are financed by multiple financiers through a competitive auction process.

Three entities — Receivables Exchange of India Ltd., A.TReDS, and Mynd Solutions — have been operating TReDS for more than three years.

A senior public sector bank official said Banks’ have requested RBI to allow them TCI cover on TReDS platform initially in view of the rising stress in the MSME segment.

Moreover, this can buoy MSME financing activity, which is one of the priority areas for the Government as part of its Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (Self-Reliant India campaign), on the platform.

If the central bank allows TCI coverage to financiers on TReDS platform initially and it proves successful, this could be extended to other financing activities at a later stage, the Banker quoted opined.

According to RBI’s Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India 2019-20, the number of MSMEs customers availing Covid-19 related moratorium increased to 78 per cent in August 2020, reflecting the stress in the sector.

As per RBI data on “Progress in MSME Financing through TReDS”, in FY2020, the number of invoices uploaded on TReDS platforms jumped 111 per cent year-on-year (yoy) to 5,30,077, with the amount involved rising 95 per cent yoy to ₹13,088.27 crore.

The number of invoices financed in the reporting year rose 106 per cent yoy to 4,77,969, with the amount involved rising 91 per cent yoy to ₹11,165.86 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 90 91 92 93 94 95