RBI cancels licence of West Bengal-based United Cooperative Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India on Thursday said it has cancelled the licence of United Co-operative Bank Ltd, Bagnan, West Bengal, as it does not have adequate capital and earning prospects. Consequently, the bank ceases to carry on banking business, with effect from the close of business on May 13, 2021, the Reserve Bank of India said in a statement.

“As per the data submitted by the bank, all the depositors will receive full amount of their deposits from Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC),” it said.

On liquidation, every depositor would be entitled to receive deposit insurance claim amount in respect of his/her deposits up to a monetary ceiling of Rs 5 lakh from the DICGC subject to the provisions of the DICGC Act, 1961.

Giving details, the RBI said the bank does not have adequate capital and earning prospects. Also, the bank with its present financial position would be unable to pay its present depositors in full, it added.

United Co-operative Bank has been prohibited from conducting the business of ‘banking’ which includes acceptance of deposits and repayment of deposits with immediate effect.

The RBI has requested the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, West Bengal to issue an order for winding up the bank and appoint a liquidator.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

The financial condition of PMC Bank continues to be precarious: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India said any generalisation for release of funds to meet ‘financial needs’ of scam-hit Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank’s depositors may not be appropriate and sustainable, owing to the bank’s precarious financial position.

The central bank made the aforementioned observation in its affidavit filed in the Delhi High Court in reply to consumer rights activist Bejon Kumar Misra’s petition.

Also read: Distraught depositors want PMC Bank revived soon

Through the petition, Misra is seeking immediate release of emergency funds to meet financial needs arising out of out-break of second wave of Covid-19 and to declare extension of directions issued to PMC Bank under the Banking Regulation Act 1949 as ultra vires.

In its reply, the central bank said there is no merit in the relief sought by the petitioner for immediate release of emergency funds to meet the financial needs arising out of sudden out-break of second wave of Covid-19, as depositors are already allowed to withdraw up to ₹5 lakh on hardship grounds for treatment of terminal illnesses, including treatment of Covid-19.

The RBI further submitted that to make the process of withdrawal on hardship grounds easier and to avoid delays in sending such recommendation to RBI for approval, the authority for approving the payment under hardship grounds has been delegated to the PMC Bank.

“…it is the duty of PMC Bank to pay hardship amount to the eligible depositors as per directions of RBI and subject to availability of liquidity with PMC Bank,” RBI said.

Takeover/ merger

The RBI submitted that the financial condition of PMC Bank continues to be precarious, with its liquidity position not improving enough to allow much room for enhancement of withdrawal limit.

Further, the bank also needs to maintain bare minimum liquidity to run as a going concern and to make itself viable for prospective investors for takeover/ merger etc. Then the reconstruction of the bank will be feasible, which will be in the interest of larger body of depositors, the central bank said.

Due to precarious financial condition of PMC Bank and on account of significant deposit erosion, serious financial irregularities and mismanagement of affairs of the bank and to protect the interest of the depositors in general and in public interest, RBI had placed PMC Bank under directions vide directive dated September 23, 2019, the affidavit said.

Withdrawal limit

The directions are presently valid up to June 30. The withdrawal limit per depositor is capped at ₹1 lakh.

“It is submitted that all efforts are underway to expedite consultations with the prospective investors who have submitted their final offer, in order to arrive at best possible resolution in the interest of all depositors and other stakeholders of the bank,” the central bank said.

The Centrum Group-BharatPe combine is believed to be the font-runner to takeover PMC Bank.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Friction over newer compliances rising between auditors, regulators, firms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks and auditors opposed the introduction of joint audit norms, it’s the turn of the Securities and Exchange Board of India‘s recent rules on due diligence by alternative investment funds that are causing consternation.

The market regulator’s recent rules require alternative investment funds to conduct in-depth due diligence of their portfolio companies. According to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021, which came into effect on May 5, the regulator has mandated that fund managers conduct this due diligence to make sure their house is in order.

The regulations mainly impact the private equity and venture capital funds that are registered under the Alternative Investment Funds Categories 1 & 2 and hedge funds registered under the AIF Category 3 in India.

The fund managers and trustees will have to ensure that detailed policies and procedures are in place for investments and that provisions over confidentiality, conflict of interest, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and addressing investor complaints are complied with.

The PPM (private placement memorandum) will be required to check on the detailed policy and procedures as well as the compliance with the code of conduct prescribed under the newly added fourth schedule. The format for reporting requirements to Sebi and trustees could also undergo a change. The new regulations would likely require funds to share the report or the procedures with the auditors.

The due diligence will have to be undertaken at the fund level as well as the investment level.

Fund managers will also have to realign investments to comply with the new regulations, as Sebi has put a threshold on the money a fund can invest in a company or another investment vehicle.

The RBI regulations

On April 27, the RBI released new guidelines for statutory auditors of financial entities to enhance the independence of auditors and tackle concentration issues. The guidelines require mandatory rotation of auditors after three years with a six-year cooling-off period, and appointment of joint auditors in entities having asset size of Rs 15,000 crore and above.

The regulations ran into opposition from bankers and auditors who wanted it to be deferred citing less time to appoint auditors and crunch. The new guidelines have come in at the end of April. We have to evaluate how we can sort of look at appointing new auditors so quickly.

Because the RBI guidelines say that existing auditors cannot continue (auditing) if they have done three years. I think in the case of most companies (non-bank lenders), the auditors would have already done more than three years, probably done four years… So, I hope that RBI defers this applicability by year or so because the year has already started, and a lot of them would have to start looking around for new audit firms,” Keki Mistry, MD and Vice Chairman Keki Mistry had told ETCFO.

“Many challenges here if implemented from FY22. Some bank auditors have already finished three years — they will only have weeks to make a new selection. The pool available to choose from will be limited for FY22 and many potential suitors would be conflicted under the new one-year cooling-off period having done such non-audit services in FY21,” Grant Thornton Bharat CEO Vishesh Chandiok had said.

Audit trail software

Earlier this year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had to defer by a year amendments to the companies accounts rules requiring firms to use accounting software that include features that can record the audit trail of each transaction.

Companies and auditors had cited little time left for the fiscal to end for them to shift to another software.

The second amendment to the Companies Accounts Rules, 2014, made the previous changes effective from April 1, 2022, according to the notification. The ministry had made the changes, to be effective from the start of the current fiscal, with the objective of curbing backdated entries by firms in the books of accounts.

“…for the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2021, every company which uses accounting software for maintaining its books of account, shall use only such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every transaction, creating an edit log of each change made in books of account along with the date when such changes were made and ensuring that the audit trail cannot be disabled,” the amendment made on March 25 had said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The country’s foreign exchange reserves surged to $576.98 billion as on March 31, 2021 from $544.69 billion at September-end last year, an RBI report said.

Foreign currency assets (FCA), a major component of the overall reserves, increased to $536.693 billion as at March-end 2021 from $502.162 billion, the report noted.

On balance of payments basis (excluding valuation changes), foreign exchange reserves increased by $83.9 billion during April-December 2020 as compared with $40.7 billion in the year-ago period, it said.

Foreign exchange reserves in nominal terms (including valuation changes) increased by $108 billion during April-December 2020 as against $47 billion in the corresponding period of 2019-20.

At the end of December 2020, the foreign exchange reserves cover of imports increased to 18.6 months from 17.1 months at September-end 2020, RBI said in its report on management of foreign exchange reserves — October 2020-March 2021, released on Wednesday.

The net forward asset (receivable) of the Reserve Bank in the domestic foreign exchange market stood at $68.2 billion as at March-end 2021.

As on March 31, 2021, the Reserve Bank held 695.31 metric tonnes of gold.

“While 403.01 metric tonnes of gold is held overseas in safe custody with the Bank of England and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), 292.30 tonnes of gold is held domestically,” the report said.

In value terms (USD), the share of gold in the total foreign exchange reserves decreased from about 6.69 per cent as at September-end 2020 to about 5.87 per cent as on March 31, 2021. Gold reserves stood at $33.88 billion at end-March 2021 as against $36.429 billion by September 2020, the report said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India added 42.3 tonnes gold to its reserves in FY21

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s gold reserves went up by 42.3 tonnes in the one-year period ended March 31, 2021, against 40.45 tonnes in the year-ago period.

As at end-March 2021, the Reserve Bank held 695.31 tonnes of gold as part of its foreign exchange reserves management against 653.01 tonnes as at March-end 2020, as per the central bank’s “Half Yearly Report on Management of Foreign Exchange (Fx) Reserves.”

During the half year period (October 2020 – March 2021) under review, India’s Fx reserves increased from $544.69 billion as at end-September 2020 to $576.98 billion as at end-March 2021.

In value terms (US Dollar), the share of gold in the total Fx reserves decreased from about 6.69 per cent as at end-September 2020 to about 5.87 per cent as at end-March 2021, the report said.

As at March-end 2021, while 403.01 tonnes of gold (360.71 tonnes as at March-end 2020) was held overseas in safe custody with the Bank of England and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), 292.30 tonnes of gold (unchanged from March-end 2020) was held domestically, RBI said.

At the end of December 2020, the foreign exchange reserves cover of imports increased to 18.6 months from 17.1 months at end-September 2020, the report said.

As per the report, the ratio of short-term debt (original maturity) to reserves, which was 18.9 per cent at end-September 2020, declined to 17.7 per cent at end-December 2020.

Further, the ratio of volatile capital flows (including cumulative portfolio inflows and outstanding short-term debt) to reserves declined from 68.0 per cent at end-September 2020 to 67.0 per cent at end-December 2020.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI to purchase seven G-Secs under G-SAP 2nd tranche

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday said it will purchase seven government securities (G-Secs), maturing between 2024 and 2035, aggregating ₹35,000 crore under the second tranche of its G-Sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP 1.0) on May 20.

The central bank’s purchase of G-Secs under the second tranche will be ₹10,000 crore more vis-a-vis the first tranche of purchase auction, which was conducted on April 15.

Under G-SAP 1.0, RBI has committed upfront to a specific amount (₹1-lakh crore in the first quarter of FY22) of open market purchases of G-Secs to enable a stable and orderly evolution of the yield curve amidst comfortable liquidity conditions.

In a statement on May 5, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das observed that the first auction under G-SAP 1.0 conducted on April 15, 2021 for a notified amount of ₹25,000 crore elicited an enthusiastic response as reflected in the bid-cover ratio of 4.1.

“G-SAP has engendered a softening bias in G-Sec yields which has continued since then. Given this positive response from the market, it has been decided that the second purchase of government securities for an aggregate amount of ₹35,000 crore under G-SAP 1.0 will be conducted on May 20, 2021,” Das then said.

With system liquidity assured, the RBI is now focusing on increasingly channelising its liquidity operations to support growth impulses, especially at the grassroot level, he added.

Meanwhile, the Government has announced the conversion/switch of 10 G-Secs for an aggregate amount of ₹20,000 crore (face value) on May 17, 2021.

Under the conversion/ switch, 10 G-Secs (carrying different coupon rates and maturity dates) maturing in 2022, 2023 and 2024, will be converted into as many destination Securities, maturing in 2033, 2035 and 2061.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Wilful defaults near Rs 2.5 lakh crore mark during pandemic, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks have tagged 662 borrowers with loans of Rs 38,976 crore as wilful defaults during the last calendar year.

With this, the total wilful defaults have reached Rs 244,602 crore from 12,917 accounts as of December 2020, from Rs 205,606 crore from 12,255 accounts in December 2019, according to a report.

While wilful defaults have doubled since 2017, the recovery from top borrowers remains negligible.

The country’s top 100 wilful defaulters owe Rs 84,632 crore to banks as of March 2020, with the top 10 including Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery and accounting for 32% of it, data from the Reserve Bank of India shows. While banks wrote o nearly three-fourth of it to clean their balance sheet and get tax benefits, the default borrowers continue to appear in RBI‘s internal CRILC database till they clear the default.

Top 100 wilful defaulters

The total size of the top 100 wilful defaults rose 5.34% in FY20 from Rs 80,344 crore as of March 2019.

Mehul Choksi-owned Gitanjali Gems topped the wilful defaulters’ list with Rs 5,693 crore dues, followed by Jhunjhunwala brothers’ REI Agro with Rs 4,403 crore and Jatin Mehta’s Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery with Rs 3,375 crore.

The top 10 wilful defaulters include another jewellery maker Forever Precious Jewellery, and Vijay Mallya’s Kingfisher Airlines Punjab National Bank had the highest exposure to Gitanjali Gems with Rs 4,644 crore of non-performing assets (NPA) as on March 2020. PNB also had Rs 1,447 crore exposure to Gili India and Rs 1,109 crore to Nakshatra Brands.

Write-offs

State Bank of India had Rs 1,875 crore dues from top 10 wilful defaulter ABG Shipyard with the bank writing o the entire amount. Uco Bank had Rs 1,970 crore exposure to REI Agro with half of it being written off.

Write-offs are accounting entries for shifting NPAs from active balance sheet to off-balance sheet accounts. These are backed by 100% provision and therefore any recovery from these accounts adds to net profit.

RBI collects credit data from banks monthly, with data on defaults being collected on a weekly basis. The regulator has mandated banks to provide fully against NPAs older than four years and allowed to write these old NPAs.

The reduction in NPAs during FY20 was largely driven by write-os, RBI had said in its report on Trend & Progress of Banking in India. Banks’ total gross NPA reduced to 8.2% at the end of March 2020 from 9.1% a year earlier.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IOB, Central Bank privatisation bid runs into RBI hurdle, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is likely to delay regularising struggling state-run lenders that are under the prompt corrective action (PCA) framework as it has reservations over their capital adequacy levels.

This may derail the privatisation prospects of Indian Overseas Bank and Central Bank, which are reported to be among the four banks shortlisted by the government for privatisation.

Indian Overseas Bank (IOB), UCO Bank and Central Bank of India are currently under the stringent PCA of RBI.

The RBI objection

In FY21, the government infused Rs 20,000 crore in ve banks through the instruments. Central Bank of India was the biggest beneficiary with Rs 4,800 crore, followed by Indian Overseas (Rs 4,100 crore), UCO Bank (Rs 2,600 crore).

However, the RBI has raised questions over the government’s bank capital infusion programme through non-interest-bearing bonds, according to a report.

The RBI reasons that capital infusion through bonds cannot be taken at face value and, therefore, these banks may still be short of regulatory capital, they said. In such a situation, they will continue under the PCA framework. Under the PCA regime, business restraints are imposed on struggling banks until they regain health.

The government went ahead despite RBI’s initial reservations and now the regulator has expressed serious concerns. The entire fund infusion through such bonds will then not count toward regulatory capital.

RBI is not inclined to pull these lenders out of the PCA framework based on such capital infusion and may further direct lenders to recalculate their capital adequacy ratio based on the actual value of the bonds.

The PCA status

All three banks under PCA Indian Overseas Bank, UCO Bank and Central Bank have reported net non-performing assets (NPAs) below levels that trigger PCA. However, on the proforma net NPA front, Central Bank falls short as its NNPA is 6.58% against the 6% required to be out of PCA.

Even after PCA exit, these banks may still be under RBI watch. In the case of IDBI Bank, which has committed to comply with the norms of minimum regulatory capital, net NPA and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis, RBI has said the lender would be under continuous monitoring. “It has been decided that IDBI Bank be taken out of PCA framework, subject to certain conditions and continuous monitoring,” RBI had said.

Privatisation bid

Four banks on the privatisation shortlist included Bank of Maharashtra, Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank and the Central Bank of India.

Two public sector banks and one general insurance company are expected to be disinvested this year in addition to the divestment of IDBI Bank, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced during Budget presentation last month.

Bringing the banks out of PCA could boost their valuations in the event of privatisation.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI appoints Jose J Kattoor as Executive Director, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India has appointed Jose J Kattoor as Executive Director (ED), the central bank said in a statement on Monday.

Prior to being promoted as ED, Kattoor was heading Bengaluru Regional Office of the Reserve Bank as Regional Director for Karnataka.

He will look after Human Resource Management Department, Corporate Strategy and Budget Department and Rajbhasha Department.

Kattoor has, over a span of three decades, served in communication, human resource management, financial inclusion, supervision, currency management and other areas in the Reserve Bank.

He holds a post-graduate qualification from Institute of Rural Management, Anand, Bachelor of Law from Gujarat University, and Advanced Management Program (AMP) from Wharton School of Business, Pennsylvania, besides having earned professional qualifications, including Certified Associate of Indian Institute of Banking and Finance (CAIIB).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India Inc’s overseas borrowing touches $9.23 billion, a two year high in March

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


External commercial borrowings (ECBs) of Indian corporates have hit a two-year high of $9.23 billion in March 2021. Prior to this, the overseas borrowing of India Inc touched a monthly high of $12.18 billion in March 2019.

The spike in overseas borrowing comes after months of lacklustre demand for external debt due to surplus liquidity in the domestic market, muted credit demand and absence of major expansion plans by Indian corporates since the onset of the pandemic.

After hitting an historic high of $52 billion in FY20, overseas borrowing of India Inc fell sharply since the beginning of FY21. Overseas debt of Indian companies fell to $3.51 billion in the first quarter of FY21 after recording a high of $19 billion in the previous quarter. However, with multiple phases of unlocking and rebound in economic activity, the external fund-raising picked up momentum to reach $9 billion in the second quarter, $7 billion in third and $16 billion in the last quarter of the previous fiscal.

“The lower borrowings from the overseas markets in the current financial year can in large part be attributed to the pandemic-led economic and business disruptions that have made corporates reluctant to borrow and add to their liabilities amid uncertainties about the future business and economic conditions,” CARE Ratings said in its Debt Market Review for February 2021.

Sudden spike

The sudden spike in ECBs in March 2021 can largely be attributed to Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) which alone raised $4.92 billion under RBI’s approval route for the purpose of ‘Infrastructure development’.

“I would not immediately connect the increase in overseas borrowing directly with economic revival. Increase in overseas borrowing could be for a variety of factors such as lower cost of funds, greater liquidity in the international market, negative interest rates in many jurisdictions,” said Adity Chaudhury, Partner, Argus Partners.

She, added that India Inc’s latest results show a healthy recovery post the first wave of Covid-19 and point towards an economic revival but growth in overseas funding will depend on a variety of factors pointed above.

For the full year, India Inc’s overseas borrowing stood at $35.06 billion in FY21, lower than $52 billion fund raise in FY20 and $41 billion in FY19.

Top borrowers

Reliance Industries topped that list of overseas borrowers in FY21 raising a little over $7 billion or 20 per cent of the total ECB fund raise of India Inc followed by IRFC ($4.08 billion), REC Limited ($1.95 billion), Adani Ports ($1.75 billion) and ONGC Videsh Rovuma ($1.60 billion).

On a sectoral basis, the financial services sector continues to be the major borrower of overseas debt with a total fundraising of about $10 billion, followed by Coke and refined petroleum manufacturers ($8 billion) and Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply ($3 billion).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 69 70 71 72 73 95