RBI imposes Rs 25 lakh penalty on Punjab and Sind Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India on Friday imposed a penalty of Rs 25 lakh on Punjab and Sind Bank for non-compliance with certain provisions of directions on ‘Cyber Security Framework in Banks’.

The state-owned bank had reported a few cyber incidents to the RBI on May 16 and 20, 2020, the central bank said while giving details.

“Examination of the incident reports and the report of the forensic analysis of the said incidents revealed, non-compliance with aforesaid directions,” it said.

The RBI issued a show-cause notice to the bank.

“After considering the bank’s reply to the show-cause notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing and examination of further clarifications/ documents furnished by the bank, RBI came to the conclusion that to the extent the charges of non-compliance with RBI directions were substantiated, it warranted imposition of monetary penalty,” the central bank said.

Meanwhile, a penalty of Rs 1 lakh on the Nagar Sahkari Bank Limited, Etawah for contravention of certain regulations, including the one on ‘Income Recognition, Asset Classification, Provisioning and Other Related Matters – UCBs’.

In both cases, the RBI said the penalty is based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by them with their customers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

At G-Sec auctions, bid at yields closer to the prevailing secondary market level: RBI to PDs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is understood to have asked primary dealers(PDs) to bid at Government Security (G-Sec) auctions at yields closer to the prevailing secondary market level.

This comes in the backdrop of some PDs bidding at higher yields (or quoting lower price) to buy G-Secs at auctions at a time when the government borrowing programme for FY22 is huge at ₹12.10 lakh crore.

Currently, the central bank is undertaking G-Sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP) as well as special open market operations to keep the yields under check.

Also read: Investors’ interest in 2030 G-Sec wanes

So, the central bank expects PDs, whose primary role is to support the Government’s market borrowing programme and improve the secondary market liquidity in G-Secs, to bid accordingly as they get a fee for their underwriting commitment at G-Sec auctions.

Cost of borrowing

Market players say if yields quoted by bidders at G-Sec auctions are higher than the prevailing secondary market yields, the RBI either devolves the auction on PDs or rejects all the bids. This ensures that the Government’s cost of borrowing does not go up.

Meanwhile, on a review of market conditions and market borrowing programme of the government, RBI has decided that the benchmark securities of 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, 14-year tenors and floating rate bonds (FRBs) will be, henceforth, be issued using uniform price auction method.

For other benchmark securities — 30-year and 40-year — the auction will continue to be multiple price-based auction, as hitherto.

In a uniform price auction, all the successful bidders are required to pay for the allotted quantity of securities at the same rate at the auction cut-off rate, irrespective of the rate quoted by them. In a multiple price auction, the successful bidders are required to pay for the allotted quantity of securities at the respective price/ yield at which they have bid.

At the weekly G-Sec (GS) auction,the RBI devolved about 95 per cent of the notified amount of ₹11,000 crore the Government wanted to raise through the 2026 G-Sec (coupon rate: 5.63 per cent) on PDs.

Greenshoe amount

The auction of three other papers — Government of India FRB 2033 (notified amount: ₹4,000 crore), 6.64 per cent GS 2035 (₹10,000 crore) and 6.67 per cent GS 2050 (₹7,000 crore) — sailed through. In fact, RBI accepted greenshoe amount of ₹2,500 crore in the case of GS 2035.

In the secondary market, yield on the devolved 2026 G-Sec went up about 5 basis points to close at 5.75 per cent(previous close:5.70 per cent), with its price declining about 21 paise to close at ₹99.49 (₹99.70).

Bond yields and price are inversely related and move in opposite directions.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Share of upgraded listed debt issues at a three-year high for ICRA and Crisil in Q4 FY21: FSR

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The share of upgraded listed debt issues was at a three-year high for two rating agencies while the share of downgraded listed debt issues in total outstanding ratings fell in the fourth quarter of 2020-21 as against previous quarters.

This was revealed by the Financial Stability Report, July 2021 of the Reserve Bank of India.

“On an aggregate basis, the share of downgraded listed debt issues in total outstanding ratings declined significantly during the fourth quarter of 2020-21 vis-à-vis earlier quarters, while the share of upgraded listed debt issues was at a three-year high for both ICRA and CRISIL,” the FSR said.

For ICRA, upgraded and re-affirmed listed debt issues was 99.8 per cent in the fourth quarter of last fiscal while downgraded and suspended issues were 0.2 per cent. This is in contrast to just 88 per cent upgraded and re-affirmed listed debt issues in the fourth quarter of 2019-20.

Similarly, in the case of Crisil upgraded and re-affirmed listed debt issues was 99.9 per cent in the March 2021 quarter versus 91.2 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2019-20.

For Care Ratings too, upgraded and re-affirmed listed debt issues had risen to 95.2 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2020-21 as against 78 per cent in the same period in the previous fiscal.

“Out of the rating downgrades during the fourth quarter of 2020- 21, the share of the NBFC and housing finance company sectors as well as banks and financial services went down significantly as compared to the preceding quarter,” the FSR further noted.

In the quarter ended March 31, 2021, the rating downgrades for NBFCs accounted for 11.1 per cent of the overall downgrades in the quarter as against 28.6 per cent in the December 2020 quarter.

The share of banks, financial services in rating downgrades was nil in the March 2021 quarter versus 11.9 per cent in the previous quarter.

The power sector had the largest share of rating downgrades in the March 2021 quarter at 38.9 per cent as against 38.1 per cent in the previous quarter.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Now, Indian crypto exchanges hit by payment processors pullout, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Just as they were breathing easy with the Reserve Bank of India clarifying that banks can do due diligence of crypto clients, Indian crypto exchanges have been hit by another hurdle.

With the RBI reiterating that it does not favour cryptocurrencies, major payment gateways have pulled out hitting transactions.

Customer complaints have inundated all India’s key exchanges as the pullout by major payment gateways, including Razorpay, PayU and BillDesk has hit transactions, according to social media and users.

The options

Options being resorted to including tying up with smaller payment gateways, building their own payment processors, holding back on immediate settlements or offering only peer-to-peer transactions.

At least two exchanges have tied up with smaller payment processing firm, Airpay, as its larger peers have cut ties.

Some crypto exchanges, such as WazirX, are forced to stick only to peer-to-peer transactions on certain days, while others, such as Vauld, allow bank transfers with manual settlement as they hunt for a payment processor, backing up settlements.

Smaller payment gateways have not proved very successful in executing high volumes of transactions, leading to failures that have resulted in a flood of user complaints.

Others, such as Bitbns, have built their own basic payment processor, allowing some essential transactions since the systems do not require prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, the central bank.

A grey area

Despite the boom, cryptocurrencies are in a grey area in India, with the Reserve Bank hostile towards it and the government unsure about its prospects.

There is no legislation or regulatory code yet to govern the crypto ecosystem, leading to confusion among customers, businesses and financial institutions providing banking services.

In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India barred financial institutions from supporting crypto transactions, which the Supreme Court overturned in 2020. The government has circulated a draft bill outlawing all cryptocurrency activities, which has been under discussion since 2019.

Last month, the RBI asked banks not to cite its 2018 circular and clarified that banks can do their own KYC for crypto clients. With this, banks are now reassessing the situation, but several banks currently lack the technical expertise to make a supervisory assessment on these transactions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks tank up on capital but corporate loan demand is missing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank credit growth to the industrial sector decelerated 0.8% year-to-date as of May 21, 2021, due to poor loan offtake from the corporate sector.

It slowed the non-food credit growth to 5.9 per cent in May 2021, as compared to 6.1 per cent in the year-ago month, RBI data showed.

On the other hand, personal loans registered an accelerated growth of 12.4 per cent in May 2021, as compared to 10.6 per cent a year ago, primarily due to accelerated growth in vehicle loans and credit card outstanding.

What’s up?

Corporates are preferring to deleverage debt and waiting it out for the pandemic to end before committing any new capital expenditure. They are retiring high-cost bank loans by tapping the bond markets where funds are available for cheaper rates.

Banks anticipate a loan demand surge from retail as the pandemic ebbs in the year ahead. However, the corporate loan demand is not yet on horizon.

Loans to industry

Loans to industries were 1.7% higher on year as of May 22, 2020, according to data on sectoral deployment of bank loans in May released by the Reserve Bank of India.

The RBI said that the fall in loans extended to industries was mainly because credit to large industries contracted by 1.7% compared to a growth of 2.8% a year ago.

However, credit to medium industries registered a robust growth of 45.8% compared to 5.3% in the previous year, and those to micro and small industries registered a growth of 5.0% versus a contraction of 3.4%.

Within the industrial sector, mining and quarrying, food processing, textiles, gems and jewellery, wood and wood products, paper and paper products, glass and glassware, infrastructure, leather and leather products, rubber, as well as plastic and plastic products registered higher growth in May.

On the other hand, credit to beverages and tobacco, petroleum coal products and nuclear fuels, vehicles, vehicle parts and transport equipment, basic metal and metal products, cement and cement products, all engineering, chemicals and chemical products and construction decelerated, RBI said in a release.

Fiscal 2021

Growth in credit to the private corporate sector, however, declined for the sixth successive quarter in the fourth quarter of the last fiscal and its share in total credit stood at 28.3 per cent. RBI said the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on outstanding credit has moderated by 91 basis points during 2020-21, including a decline of 21 basis points in Q4.

Overall credit growth in India slowed down in FY21 to 5.6 per cent from 6.4 per cent in FY20 as the economy was hit hard by Covid. and subsequent lockdowns.

Credit growth to the industrial sector remained in the negative territory during 2020-21, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdowns. Industrial loan growth, on the other hand, remained negative during all quarters of 2020-21.”

The RBI further said working capital loans in the form of cash credit, overdraft and demand loans, which accounted for a third of total credit, contracted during 2020-21, indicating the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Shift to bonds

The corporate world focused on deleveraging high-cost loans through fundraising via bond issuances despite interest rates at an all-time low. This has led to muted credit growth for banks.

Corporates raised Rs 2.1 lakh crore in December ended quarter and Rs 3.1 lakh crore in the fourth quarter from the corporate bond markets. In contrast, the corresponding year-ago figures were Rs 1.5 lakh crore and Rs 1.9 lakh crore, respectively.

Bonds were mostly raised by top-rated companies at 150-200 basis points below bank loans. Most of the debt was raised by government companies as they have top-rated status.

For AAA-rated corporate bonds, the yield was 6.85 per cent in May 2020, which fell to 5.38 per cent in April 2021 and to 5.16 per cent in May 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank executive director K Ramachandran demits office, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Indian Bank on Thursday said K Ramachandran has demitted office as the executive director of the bank post his superannuation.

Ramachandran, executive director of the bank, has demitted office on June 30, 2021, upon superannuation, the bank said in a regulatory filing.

“Accordingly, K Ramachandran has ceased to be the executive director of the bank with effect from July 1, 2021,” it added.

As per the bank website, the board of the Indian Bank consists of the MD and CEO, three executive directors, one nominee director from the government, one nominee director from the RBI and one shareholder director.

In a separate filing to exchanges, Central Bank of India said the tenure of Mini Ipe as the shareholder director has ended on June 30 and Dinesh Pangtey is elected as the shareholder director of the bank, whose tenure commences from July 1, 2021.

Pangtey’s tenure is till June 30, 2024. He is an independent director of the bank, it noted.

He is presently the whole-time director and CEO of LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management.

With a long experience in the field of finance and life insurance, Pangtey earlier held the post of chief executive officer of LICHFL AMC Ltd.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian crypto exchanges flounder as banks cut ties after RBI frown

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian cryptocurrency exchanges are scrambling to secure viable, permanent payment solutions to ensure seamless transactions after banks and payment gateways started cutting ties with them, six industry insiders said.

The exchanges are struggling to cope after the Central bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which has said it does not favour digital currencies, out of concern over their impact on financial stability, informally asked banks to steer clear.

Customer complaints have inundated all India’s key exchanges as the pull out by major payment gateways has hit transactions, according to social media and users.

Also read: Cryptocurrency-related cyberattacks are on the rise: Report

“Banks are reluctant to do business,” said Avinash Shekhar,a co-chief executive of ZebPay, one of India’s oldest crypto exchanges that is not offering immediate settlement. “We have been talking to several payment partners but the progress has been slow.”

Options being resorted to include tying up with smaller payment gateways, building their own payment processors, holding back on immediate settlements or offering only peer-to-peer transactions, the heads of five crypto exchanges said.

At least two exchanges have tied up with smaller payment processing firm, Airpay, as its larger peers have cut ties.

There is no official data, but India has nearly 15 million crypto investors, who hold more than ₹100 billion ($1.34 billion), according to industry estimates.

The alternative

Some crypto exchanges, such as WazirX, are forced to stick only to peer-to-peer transactions on certain days, while others, such as Vauld, allow bank transfers with manual settlement as they hunt for a payment processor, backing up settlements.

Also read: Even gold-obsessed Indians are now pouring billions into crypto

Even major payment gateways, such as Razorpay, PayU and BillDesk have severed ties, as they too are dependent on banks to process transactions and the pull out by large banks has left them reeling.

The three payment processors did not respond to a request for comment.

Some others, such as Coinswitch and WazirX, have signed up with a smaller Mumbai-payment processor, Airpay, for instant transfers.

The payment gateway is backed by venture capital fund Kalaari Capital and billionaire stock investor, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, who has been vociferous in his opposition to cryptocurrencies.

Jhunjhunwala did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment.

Also read: Cryptocurrency: Investors can wait till clarity emerges

Smaller payment gateways have not proved very successful in executing high volumes of transactions, leading to failures that have resulted in a flood of user complaints.

The lack of support from banks means that smaller firms, like larger counterparts, are also backing off from crypto activities.

“Partnership with the smaller payment processors has not emerged as stable yet, and is more of a temporary solution,”said the founder of an Indian crypto exchange, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Others, such as Bitbns, have built their own basic payment processor, allowing some essential transactions since the systems does not require prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, the central bank.

Also read: ED issues show cause notice to WazirX, directors under FEMA

“These are only stop-gap arrangements and not a solution to the problem the industry is facing,” said Gaurav Dahake, chief executive of domestic exchange Bitbns.

Prohibition has not augured well, as it has forced customers to opt for peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions that allow buyers and sellers to engage directly.

“Predictably, alternate transaction methods such as P2P have increased, which makes the market more inefficient and also exposes customers to the risk of fraud,” said the chiefexecutive of another crypto exchange.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Success of a bad bank initiative will depend upon design aspects: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said the aggregation of assets by the proposed National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL) is expected to assist in turning around the assets and eventually offloading them to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and other potential investors for further value unlocking.

Banks are understood to have identified 22 stressed consortium loans (₹500 crore and above) aggregating about ₹89,000 crore for transferring to NARCL, popularly termed as a “bad bank”.

According to RBI’s latest Financial Stability Report, drawing from established market principles and global experience, the success of a bad bank initiative would eventually depend upon design aspects.

The design aspects include fair pricing; complete segregation of risk from selling banks; investment of external capital; independent and professional management of the new entity; minimising moral hazard; and adequate capitalisation of the banks post-sale of assets to invigorate fresh lending.

The Board of Canara Bank had given in-principle approval on June 15, 2021, for participating in the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) as a sponsor by taking 12 per cent equity stake.

The Bengaluru-headquartered public sector bank has sought the Reserve Bank of India’s approval for the same.

Banks such as State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India and IDBI Bank are expected to take up to 10 per cent stake in NARCL.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian banks better placed to withstand future shocks -report, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI – The dent to Indian financial institutions’ balance sheets has been much less than earlier projected and banks have sufficient capital and liquidity buffers to withstand future shocks, according to a report released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The Financial Stability Report is published bi-annually by the RBI on behalf of the Financial Stability and Development Council, an umbrella group of regulators which gives a detailed overview on the health of the Indian financial system.

Banks’ gross non-performing assets could rise to 9.8% by March 2022 from around 7.48% as of the end of last March under the baseline scenario and to 11.22% under a severe stress scenario, the report said.

The projections are far less dire compared to the report released in January in which the RBI had indicated that bad loans could double in a severely stressed scenario.

“Capital and liquidity buffers are reasonably resilient to withstand future shocks, as the stress tests presented in this report demonstrate,” RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, wrote in the foreword to the report.

However, he added that there are new risks which have emerged on the horizon including the risks of future waves of the coronavirus pandemic, international commodity prices and inflationary pressures, global spillovers amid high uncertainty and rising instances of data breaches and cyber attacks.

(Reporting by Swati Bhat and Nupur Anand; editing by Jonathan Oatis)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Personal loans keep banks afloat in FY21 as industrial credit demand sinks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Credit growth to the industrial sector remained in the negative territory during 2020-21, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdowns, RBI data showed on Tuesday. However, “personal loans continued to grow at a robust pace and recorded 13.5 per cent growth (Y-oY) in March 2021; industrial loan growth, on the other hand, remained negative during all quarters of 2020-21.”

The RBI further said working capital loans in the form of cash credit, overdraft and demand loans, which accounted for a third of total credit, contracted during 2020-21, indicating the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Private banks

The data further revealed that private sector banks recorded higher loan growth when compared to public sector lenders. Their share in total credit increased to 36.5 per cent in March 2021 from 35.4 per cent a year ago and 24.8 per cent five years ago, it said.

However, the private sector banks’ loan growth slowed to 9.1 per cent in FY21, from 9.3 per cent in FY20. Public sector loans grew 3.6 per cent in FY21, down from 4.2 per cent in FY20. The lending by foreign banks shrunk by 3.3 per cent during 2020-21 as against a growth of 7.2 per cent a year ago.

Credit to the household sector rose by 10.9 per cent (Y-o-Y) and its share in total credit increased to 52.6 per cent in March 2021 from 49.8 per cent a year ago, as per the ‘Quarterly Basic Statistical Returns (BSR)-1: Outstanding Credit of Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs), March 2021’, released by the central bank.

Industrial credit

Growth in credit to the private corporate sector, however, declined for the sixth successive quarter and its share in total credit stood at 28.3 per cent. RBI said the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on outstanding credit has moderated by 91 basis points during 2020-21, including a decline of 21 basis points in Q4.

It also said bank branches in urban, semi-urban and rural areas recorded double-digit credit growth (Y-o-Y) in March 2021, whereas metropolitan branches, which accounted for 63 per cent of bank credit, logged 1.4 per cent growth.

Overall credit growth in India slowed down in FY21 to 5.6 per cent from 6.4 per cent in FY20 as the economy was hit hard by Covid. and subsequent lockdowns.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 56 57 58 59 60 95