RBI’s first purchase of G-Secs under GSAP 2.0 for Q2 on July 8

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will buy five Government Securities (G-Secs) aggregating ₹20,000 crore under its G-sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP 2.0) on July 8.

This will be the first purchase of G-Secs under G-SAP 2.0. The central bank will be purchasing five G-Secs, maturing between 2027 and 2033.

Overall, in the second quarter, the central bank will conduct open market purchase of G-Secs of ₹1.2 lakh crore under the G-SAP to support the market.

Under G-SAP 1.0, RBI committed upfront a specific amount (₹1-lakh crore in the first quarter of FY22) of open market purchases of G-Secs to enable a stable and orderly evolution of the yield curve amidst comfortable liquidity conditions.

“The endeavour (of G-SAP) will be to ensure congenial financial conditions for the recovery to gain traction…The positive externalities of G-SAP 1.0 operations need to be seen in the context of those segments of the financial markets that rely on the G-sec yield curve as a pricing benchmark,” RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said in a statement on April 7, 2021.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Western Union aims to scale up outbound remittance service

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Western Union, a global leader in cross border, cross-currency money movement and payments, wants to scale up its outbound remittance service from India this year, Sohini Rajola, Head of Network — APAC and Middle East, has said.

“Today sending money to India is easy. But for sending money from India there is still a room for process streamlining and improvement. We need to make it as seamless as sending money to India currently is. Scaling our outbound remittance service will be the focus area for Western Union India business this year,” Rajola told BusinessLine in an interview.

“As infrastructure develops at our end, we need to offer the same convenience to people sending money out as well. As and when we are able to offer direct debit or have simplified documents based on guidelines, our product will keep changing,” Rajola added.

India is the largest remittance recipient market in the world with annual inbound remittance of over $80 billion. The market for outbound remittance is however smaller at estimated level of $14 billion as of end March 2021. Infact, there has been a steady growth in outward remittance under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) route over the last few years with volumes going up from as little as $1.33 billion in 2014-15 to $ 13.79 billion in FY’18-19 and touch high of $18.76 billion in FY’19-20.

Outbound market biz

“In any country we operate, we want to offer both inbound and outbound services. Outbound is definitely a smaller market in India. But if we have been serving the Indian consumer for 25 years, we definitely want the next phase where we can serve that segment well. It is not about whether it is worth it or not. It is about the gamut of services that Western Union offers,” Rajola said when asked it was worth the effort to focus energies on relatively smaller outbound market in India.

Rajola said that her aspiration this year would be to see how Western Union can work together with the regulator and authorities to simplify the processes and offer the same level of convenience of digital remittances to people sending money out of India as available for those making inward remittances.

Impact of Covid-19

On the overall impact of Covid-19 on remittance business, she said that personal remittances saw resilient volumes despite the pandemic. “Overall as a business we processed more business in 2020 than in 2019. We don’t share corridor-specific information, but our principal increased globally,” she said.

“When the pandemic struck initially, there was an apprehension that this will drop overall remittance volumes. What we saw was there was only minor impact. We saw a big jump on the principal volume that was transacted through Western Union,” she added.

Infact, in the first wave, given the cash restrictions, Western Union’s digital business took off in a big way as from people were sending money to support their family, she added. Also, RBI categorising remittance service as an essential service helped some locations to remain open, according to Rajola.

However, in the second wave there was not that big impact on the retail locations. The impact on the physical retail business has been more muted and digital continues to be showing healthy business, she added. At a global level, Wester Union is on course to clock digital revenues of $1 billion this year.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank loans to industrial sector shrink during Modi rule, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The share of banks in loans to the industrial sector dropped massively during 2014-2021 even as credit to the retail sector, including home loans, saw a boom.

As per the data, industrial credit fell to 28.9% by March 2021 from 42.7% at the end of March 2014.

“Over recent years, the share of the industrial sector in total bank credit has declined whereas that of personal loans has grown,” the Reserve Bank of India said in its Financial Stability Report.

The environment for bank credit remains lacklustre in the midst of the pandemic, with credit supply muted by persisting risk aversion and subdued loan demand and within this overall setting, underlying shifts are becoming more evident than before, it said.

Loans to the private corporate sector declined from 37.6% in 2014 to 27.7% at the end of March 2021. During the same period, personal loans grew from 16.2 to 26.3%, in which housing loans grew from 8.5% to 13.8%.

Fiscal 2021

Bank credit growth to the industrial sector decelerated 0.8% year-to-date as of May 21, 2021, due to poor loan offtake from the corporate sector.

Growth in credit to the private corporate sector, however, declined for the sixth successive quarter in the fourth quarter of the last fiscal and its share in total credit stood at 28.3 per cent. RBI said the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on outstanding credit has moderated by 91 basis points during 2020-21, including a decline of 21 basis points in Q4.

Overall credit growth in India slowed down in FY21 to 5.6 per cent from 6.4 per cent in FY20 as the economy was hit hard by Covid. and subsequent lockdowns.

Credit growth to the industrial sector remained in the negative territory during 2020-21, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdowns. Industrial loan growth, on the other hand, remained negative during all quarters of 2020-21.”

The RBI further said working capital loans in the form of cash credit, overdraft and demand loans, which accounted for a third of total credit, contracted during 2020-21, indicating the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Shift to bonds

The corporate world focused on deleveraging high-cost loans through fundraising via bond issuances despite interest rates at an all-time low. This has led to muted credit growth for banks.

Corporates raised Rs 2.1 lakh crore in December ended quarter and Rs 3.1 lakh crore in the fourth quarter from the corporate bond markets. In contrast, the corresponding year-ago figures were Rs 1.5 lakh crore and Rs 1.9 lakh crore, respectively.

Bonds were mostly raised by top-rated companies at 150-200 basis points below bank loans. Most of the debt was raised by government companies as they have top-rated status.

For AAA-rated corporate bonds, the yield was 6.85 per cent in May 2020, which fell to 5.38 per cent in April 2021 and to 5.16 per cent in May 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks’ exposure to better-rated large borrowers declining, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that exposure of banks to better-rated large borrowers is declining, while signs of stress are being witnessed in the MSME and retail sectors.

Within the domestic financial system, credit flow from banks and capital expenditure of corporates remains muted, said a report by the central bank.

“While banks’ exposures to better rated large borrowers are declining, there are incipient signs of stress in the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and retail segments,” said the recently released Financial Stability Report for July 2021.

Further, the demand for consumer credit across banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) has dampened, with some deterioration in the risk profile of retail borrowers becoming evident.

As per the report, macro stress tests indicate that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of scheduled commercial banks (SCB) may increase from 7.48 per cent in March 2021 to 9.80 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario.

In case of a severe stress scenario, the GNPA may rise to 11.22 per cent, although SCBs have sufficient capital, both at the aggregate and individual level, even under stress.

Further, the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) increased to 16.03 per cent and the provisioning coverage ratio (PCR) stood at 68.86 per cent in March 2021.

In his foreword for the report, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said that the sustained policy support along with further strengthening of capital buffers by banks and other financial institutions remain vital amid the Covid-19 pandemic.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Airtel Payments Bank hopeful of break-even in FY22; logs surge in biz volumes amid pandemic, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: Airtel Payments Bank has seen a surge in business volumes in FY21 as lockdown curbs and migrants heading back to villages spurred new accounts as well as transactions, and the company is eyeing a break-even this fiscal, a top official said. Factors like growth in revenues, expanded scale of operations, and higher realisation per user from cross selling of products are expected to drive break-even in the current financial year.

The pandemic and subsequent lockdown curbs fuelled uptake as customers, both in rural interiors and urban cities, sought banking solutions closer home, opting for convenient and secure digital payment options. The bank witnessed a strong traction for its diversified product offerings such digital payments, money transfers, insurance, direct benefit transfer credits, Aadhaar-enabled payment system and collection management services.

A senior company official, who did not wish to be named, said Airtel Payments Bank is “confident” of a break-even this year, having reached the “right level of scale” with its large base of users.

A mail sent to the company did not elicit a response.

Meanwhile, the official said the company has build an adequate infrastructure, backed by investments in technology, to serve consumers and hence fixed costs and incremental investments are expected to remain in check.

The current user base of 5.5 crore reflects a large distributed cost base across customers for the company, the official said noting that the losses too have nearly halved in Q4 of FY21, compared to the year ago period.

Losses for full year FY21 were at about Rs 420 crore, while the fourth quarter losses stood at nearly Rs 70 crore. The company logged over 32 per cent growth in revenue at almost Rs 627 crore for FY21 from Rs 474 crore in previous fiscal.

COVID induced movement restrictions and curfews in different parts of the country had made it difficult for those living in villages as also migrants returning to their hometowns, to access conventional bank branches located some distance away to withdraw money.

Airtel Payments Bank – which has one of largest retail networks with over 500,000 neighbourhood banking points – saw marked increase in new accounts opening during the FY21, as transactions too rose, the company official said. At present, one in six villages in the country is being served by Airtel Payments Bank.

The company expects the digital payment momentum to continue, even accelerate in coming times, the official said.

Earlier this year, Airtel Payments Bank announced its customers will get an increased interest rate of six per cent per annum on savings account deposit of over Rs 1 lakh. The move, announced in May this year, followed Airtel Payments Bank becoming the first payments bank to implement an enhanced day-end savings limit of Rs 2 lakh, as per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines. The interest rate is at 2.5 per cent per annum for a deposit up to Rs 1 lakh.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Gold loans — a win-win for banks, customers

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Loans against gold jewellery seem to have become a veritable gold mine for banks, going by the rapid growth in their portfolio in FY21.

This is underscored by the fact that the portfolio of banks swelled 81.6 per cent year-on-year (y-o-y) to ₹60,464 crore as on March 26, 2021, against ₹33,303 crore as on March 27, 2020, as per Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data.

One can liken the growth in banks’ loans against gold jewellery portfolio to gold rush.

The portfolio clocked 33.9 per cent y-o-y growth as on March 27, 2020, over the March 29, 2019, outstanding figure of ₹24,866 crore.

These numbers are based on the Reserve Bank of India’s data on bank credit collected from select 33 scheduled commercial banks (SCBs), which account for about 90 per cent of the total non-food credit deployed by all SCBs.

A Covid-positive

The demand for gold loans surged after the outbreak of the pandemic in March 2020 as the economy reeled under its impact, leading to job losses, salary cuts, and mounting emergency health expenses.

Small businesses used these loans, post the six-month Covid-related moratorium period, to either ensure continued operations or re-start operations that had to be shut down temporarily due to lockdowns.

These loans have helped individuals and small businesses keep their head above water during these stressful times.

Moreover, the RBI, too, played its part by liberalising rules, which saw banks double down on the gold loan portfolio.

To mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic on households, entrepreneurs and small businesses, the central bank, in August 2020, increased the Loan To Value (LTV: loan amount to asset value ratio) for loans against the pledge of gold ornaments and jewellery for non-agricultural purposes from 75 per cent to 90 per cent till March 31, 2021.

Elevated gold price

With a higher LTV and elevated gold price, borrowers could get more loan per gram of gold pledged.

Competitive interest rate was the icing on the cake, with public sector banks such as Bank of Maharashtra and State Bank of India charging 7.35 per cent and 7.50 per cent, respectively.

The aforementioned factors aided banks in making deeper inroads into a business segment, traditionally dominated by gold loan companies such as Muthoot Finance and Manappuram Finance.

For example, in FY21, State Bank of India’s portfolio of general purpose personal loan against pledge of gold ornaments soared 465 per cent year-to-date (y-t-d) to ₹20,987 crore as on March 31, 2021, from ₹3,715 crore in the beginning of the financial year.

Bank of Maharashtra’s retail gold loan portfolio grew about 11 times in FY21 to about ₹1,370 crore.

Bank of Baroda’s retail gold loan portfolio more than doubled from ₹436 crore as on March 31, 2020, to ₹1,101 crore as on March 31, 2021.

The overall gold loan advances of Federal Bank and CSB Bank shot up 70 per cent y-o-y (to ₹15,816 crore) and 61 per cent y-o-y (₹6,131 crore), respectively, in FY21. However, details of growth in retail gold loans were not readily available.

Immediate liquidity

AS Rajeev, MD and CEO, Bank of Maharashtra (BoM), observed that the full potential of gold loans was not explored by his bank in the past. So, the Bank revamped the gold loan scheme to make it more convenient, competitive and customer-friendly.

“Considering the testing times, when many of the individuals and small businesses were cash starved, gold loan was instrumental in providing immediate liquidity.

“Our (overall) gold loan portfolio rose (about 7 times in FY21) to ₹1,939 crore by March-end 2021, and it stands at more than ₹2,100 crore as on date,” he said. Rajeev added BoM’s portfolio is expected to grow to ₹5,000 crore by the end of this fiscal.

C VR Rajendran, MD and CEO, CSB Bank, in a recent earnings call, emphasised that a major chunk of his bank’s incremental advances in FY21 came from gold loans. About 76 per cent of the advance growth was contributed by growth in gold loans.

“Last time our gold loan growth was so good because NBFCs were not at all active in the field. Once the customer comes out of NBFC and comes to a bank, he will not go back to the NBFC because the value proposition in a bank is better, the rates are very good.

“So, whatever we gained during that period, we will retain. Probably this pandemic will also help us acquire more new clients from the higher interest segment which should be good for us. It is a good value proposition for the borrower; it’s a win-win situation,” said Rajendran.

Zero capital requirement

Given that gold loan is fully secured, has less default risk and zero capital charge, it is an attractive product for lenders.

Banking expert V Viswanathan noted that as gold is an eligible cash collateral, there is zero capital requirement for loans against gold ornaments and jewellery. Further, as these loans are fully secured, they can be recovered (without court intervention) through auction.

He suggested that banks should consider introducing a ‘simple cash flow statement’ for one year to determine the repayment period and affordable Equated Monthly Instalments (EMIs). If inflows are low, they should sanction gold loan with interest repayment only and renew principal annually.

Viswanathan said borrowers can overcome liquidity mismatches via gold loans at low interest rates. There is no need to follow-up for getting loans. Further, there is no pressure to find money to pay as gold covers the loan.

In FY22 so far, growth in loans against gold jewellery relatively slowed down to 33.8 per cent y-o-y as on May 21, 2021, against 86.3 per cent y-o-y as on May 22, 2020.

Given the spectacular growth in the loans against gold jewellery portfolio in FY21, it remains to be seen if bankers continue to have the Midas touch with the portfolio in FY22, too.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

A call to preserve the ‘value’ of MSMEs at any cost

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

Swaminathan Gurumurthy, member of the Board of the Reserve Bank of India, is an original thinker who follows the ‘Third Way’ propounded by the likes of Deendayal Upadhyaya and the labour movement leader Dattopant Thengdi when it comes to questions of finance and economics.

Recently, he wrote about how lenders should prevent illiquidity from leading to insolvency for enterprises, particularly in the MSME sector.

From a banker’s perspective, there is no better way to encapsulate what lenders should do under the current conditions for borrowers.

The primary focus

Even though fresh investments and new units ought to be supported, the primary focus now should be on protecting the units already working because the negative demonstration effect of MSMEs collapsing will be disastrous.

Gurmurthy’s construct assumes relevance here. If bankers can internalise this spirit and implement the government’s and RBI’s schemes for MSMEs – tailoring /customising them appropriately – MSMEs can weather the Covid impact.

As one of the world’s few full-service regulators, RBI Governor Shaktikanta has been admirably proactive right from January 2019 in supporting all MSME units facing financial stress through a restructuring scheme (without it resulting in downgradation of the asset as is the norm).

After board-level discussions on November 18, 2018, the first of these instructions were issue on January 1, 2019, valid up to March, 2020.

Restructuring

The special provision encouraging banks to offer restructuring to all eligible unitswas extended soon after the Covid-induced lockdown in April 2020, and now in the wake of the second wave impact, again up to September 30, under the Covid2.0 resolution framework.

Coupled with the Modi government’s Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme, increased from ₹3- lakh crore to ₹4.5-lakh crore last week, the attempt is to ensure that money is available to all eligible units.

The RBI has also been supporting the liquidity requirements of banks by giving three-year money under its Long Term Repo Operations. Consequently, the average daily liquidity in the system is of ₹4 lakh crore.

Enough cheap money to go around, the government stepping in to guarantee loans, the regulator permitting a liberal restructuring of debt – banks cannot ask for more to support MSMEs and negotiate their cash flow problems.

What needs to be done?

So what are the practical steps to be taken up by banks? The following could be a 12-point template for this process. 1) Considering that the only condition stipulated by RBI is that the maximum moratorium as part of the restructuring should not exceed 2 years, a liberal restructuring scheme should be implemented forthwith.

2) The primary skill needed will be the ability to take a call on the intrinsic viability of the business and whether with support, the business will survive.

3) While all efforts are worth taking to keep the business afloat, in the very rare cases where the borrower is seen as unable to carry on activities even with additional support, it is better to take a decision early not to support. One of the fundamental principles of credit is that a ‘no’ today is often better than a ‘yes’ five/six months later.

4) The RBI has advised that the process of restructuring should be implemented and completed within 90 days of application by the borrower.

5) The usual tool kit of restructuring like conversion of erosion of working capital loan into a Working Capital Term Loan, conversion of unpaid interest into a Funded Interest Term Loan, rephasement of unpaid Term Loan instalment, additional need-based working capital loans, a term loan for meeting further cash losses for one year, and reduction in interest rates, along with moratorium on all repayments, should be extended to all requiring this assistance.

4) There may be need to conduct crash courses for loan officers as the average ticket size of the loans requiring recasting will be low and there will be knowledge/skill gaps at those levels. Terms like WCTL/FITL/Dimunition in Fair Value (a key factor in restructuring) and the Right of Recompense may be alien to many officials.

5) There is need to advertise and publicise this restructuring facility. Many borrowers and, sometimes branch officials, may not be aware of the scheme, its import and intent.

6) There will be requirement for hand holding by Chartered Accountants in preparing reasonable projections so that these units do not end up in another cul de sac again. Most often, banks do not receive the detailed workings required to put up restructuring proposals.

7) Often, it is found that date-keeping of the process is not proper. Borrowers need to be aware of their rights too as per RBI directions.

8) The RBI has instructed that “a register/ electronic record should be maintained by the bank wherein the date of receipt, sanction/rejection/disbursement with reasons thereof, etc. should be recorded. Banks should provide acknowledgement for loan applications received under priority sector loans”. This will apply to all restructuring requests, too.

9) It may be a good idea to build in the provision for sanction of a ‘Standby Cashflow Mismatch Credit Facility’ (with suitable margin stipulations) as part of all fresh loans both for working capital and term loans initially itself – akin to a proxy Debt Service Reserve – as most often, after a loan account has started exhibiting signs of stress, no officer wants to recommend/sanction additional finance for fear of being pulled up in accountability studies later on.

10) Declining of any credit facility, whether fresh or for rephasement, should be only with the approval of the next higher authority in banks.

These 12 points could form the basis for a genuine and whole-hearted approach to support MSMEs.

MSMEs represent entrepreneurship at its best and are our Swadeshi Start-ups. Indeed, the Union government has done well in now including retail and wholesale trade as part of MSMEs for priority sector lending. An executive order of the government of India in 2017 had excluded trade from MSMEs.

Clearly, a liquidity problem is bugging most MSME units now. We owe it to our next generation to tune our collective approach to value-preservation and not value-negation of these entrepreneurs. It is worth remembering that today’s MRF started as a toy-balloon manufacturing unit in 1946. That is the promise and the prospect MSMEs hold.

 

 

(The author is a Chief General Manager with a leading Public Sector Bank)

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SC seeks response of Centre, RBI on plea of PNB against disclosure of info under RTI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has refused to grant interim stay on the RBI‘s notice asking Punjab National Bank to disclose information such as defaulters list and its inspection reports under the RTI Act, and sought responses from the Centre, federal bank and its central public information officer.

The apex court tagged the plea of the Punjab National Bank (PNB), which is a public sector unit bank, with a similar pending case filed by HDFC Bank against the RBI’s direction.

“Issue notice. Tag with writ petition (Civil) No.1159 of 2019 (HDFC plea),” a bench comprising justices S Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari said, and fixed the plea for hearing on July 19.

Banks are aggrieved by the notices issued by the RBI to them under Section 11(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act asking them to part with information pertaining to their inspection reports and risk assessment.

The RTI Act empowers the RBI’s central public information officer (CPIO) to seek information from banks for information seekers.

Earlier on April 28, the top court, on legal grounds, had refused to recall its famous 2015 judgment in the Jayantilal N Mistry case, which had held that the RBI will have to provide information about banks and financial institutions (FIs) regulated by it under the transparency law.

Several FIs and banks, including Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda, UCO Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank had filed applications in the top court seeking a recall of the 2015 judgment in the Jayantilal N Mistry case, saying the verdict had far-reaching consequences and moreover, they were directly and substantially affected by it.

The banks had contended that the pleas for a recall of the judgment, instead of a review, is “maintainable” as there was a violation of the principles of natural justice in view of the fact that they were neither parties to the matter nor heard.

“A close scrutiny of the applications for a recall makes it clear that in substance, the applicants are seeking a review of the judgment in Jayantilal N Mistry. Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that these applications are not maintainable,” the apex court had held.

While dismissing the pleas, the bench, however, had made it clear that it was not dealing with any of the submissions made by the banks on the correctness of the 2015 judgment.

Now, the apex court is seized of several pleas of banks like HDFC and Punjab National Bank against the RBI’s direction to disclose information under RTI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI warns against combination of high public debt, low interest rates, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: As economies around the world witness ultra-low interest rates and rising public debt amid the pandemic, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that the combination would pose challenges.

The pandemic response saw a tight interaction of monetary and fiscal policy. As monetary policy has sought to control a larger segment of the yield curve, the overlap with public debt management has grown, noted RBI’s Financial Stability Report for July.

It noted that with monetary policy committed to an easy stance for some time in many countries, the fiscal stance becomes important.

Too loose a fiscal stance could cause inflation surprises and financial conditions could tighten, it said, adding that a more constrained fiscal policy would add pressure on monetary policy.

“It would test the efficacy of further monetary expansion and could heighten intertemporal tradeoffs,” it said.

The extraordinary combination of high debt-to-GDP ratios and ultra-low interest rates raises three challenges, said the central bank’s report, with the first being the risk of fiscal dominance.

Further, it may also lead to a situation where fiscal positions may ultimately prove unsustainable and the complications of the possible joint “normalisation” of fiscal and monetary policies would also crop.

Growth-friendly fiscal policy, the RBI suggested, can help by effectively targeting public infrastructure and productivity.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


About 15.9% of loans less than Rs 25 crore to the MSME sector for public sector banks has turned bad as of March 2021, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

This was against an NPA ratio of 13.1% at the end of December 2020 and 18.2% at the end of March 2020. Loans due past zero days and 30 days also rose significantly to 60.7% and 10.6% respectively.

On the other hand private sector lenders recorded NPA ratio of 3.6% at the end of March 2021 against 2% at the end of December 2020 and 4.3% at the end of March. Loans due beyond zero days and 30 days also rose by 89.6% and 3.7% respectively.

As of February 2021, 80% of the MSME borrowers moved into high-risk category as per data released by the regulator.

MSMEs worst hit

The medium, Micro and Small Enterprises are among the worst hit and they face enormous stress in meeting their payment obligations, the Reserve Bank of India said in its latest edition of the Financial Stability Report.

“Despite the restructuring, however, stress in the MSME portfolio of PSBs remains high,” the regulator noted. “While PSBs have actively resorted to restructuring under all the schemes, participation by PVBs was significant only in the COVID-19 restructuring scheme offered in August 2020,” RBI said.

“Given the elevated level of debt of the stressed cohort, the implications of business disruptions following the resurgence of the pandemic could be significant,” the RBI said

The restructuring

Since 2019, weakness in the MSME portfolio of banks and NBFCs has drawn regulatory attention, with the Reserve Bank permitting restructuring of temporarily impaired MSME loans (of size up to Rs 25 crore) under three schemes.

As per data with the RBI, the banking industry together restructured loans worth Rs 36,000 crore under the August 2020 Covid loan restructuring scheme. Public sector banks held the lions share at Rs 24,816 crore while private banks recast MSME loans worth Rs 11,027 crore.

In contrast to this PSBs have been laggards in lending to this sector with aggregate MSME exposure growing at a paltry 0.89% in the last fiscal year ended March 2020. For private lenders this exposure grew 9.23% during the same time.

“Growth in credit to MSMEs during 2020-21 was aided by the ECLGS scheme, with aggregate sanctions at Rs 2.46 lakh crore at the end of February 2021,” RBI noted. “For Public sector banks credit to the sector remained flat and new disbursements turned negative, after adjusting for interest accretion on past loans; private banks on the other hand, showed relatively robust increase in exposure.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 55 56 57 58 59 95