RBI’s first financial inclusion index at 53.9

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The first reading of the Reserve Bank of India’s annual Financial Inclusion (FI) Index for the period ending March 2021 has come in at 53.9 against 43.4 for the period ending March 2017.

The index captures information on various aspects of financial inclusion in a single value ranging between 0 and 100, where 0 represents complete financial exclusion and 100 indicates full financial inclusion.

The FI Index comprises three broad parameters (weights indicated in brackets) – Access (35 per cent), Usage (45 per cent), and Quality (20 per cent), with each of these consisting of various dimensions computed based on a number of indicators.

RBI comes up with Digital Payments Index

The Index, which has been has been constructed without any ‘base year’ and as such reflects cumulative efforts of all stakeholders over the years towards financial inclusion, is responsive to ease of access, availability and usage of services, and quality of services, comprising all 97 indicators, the RBI said in a statement.

A unique feature of the Index is the Quality parameter, which captures the quality aspect of financial inclusion as reflected by financial literacy, consumer protection, and inequalities and deficiencies in services, it added.

The FI Index, which will be published annually in July every year, has been conceptualised as a comprehensive index incorporating details of banking, investments, insurance, postal as well as the pension sector in consultation with government and respective sectoral regulators.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Card issuing banks may be hit if Mastercard ban continues for long, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A month after predicting a hit to five private sector banks due to the ban on Mastercard by the Reserve Bank of India, the global brokerage has said that there would be no material impact on the card issuers.

Nomura Global Markets Research says it does not foresee any material impact on card issuers in the near term, especially credit card issuers, but there could be a medium-term impact if this situation persists, according to a report.

What Nomura said

As many as five private sector banks, including Axis Bank, Yes Bank, and IndusInd Bank, are to be impacted by the Reserve Bank of India’s decision to ban Mastercard from issuing new cards for not complying with local data storage guidelines, Nomura had said last month.

HDFC Bank would also have been affected by this decision but the lender is already facing restrictions by the RBI on issuance of new cards (debit, credit or prepaid).

Besides these five banks, Bajaj Finserve and SBI Card may face problems as they were also issuing cards of this payment gateway.

So, in all, as per the report of global brokerage firm Nomura, seven financial institutions would not be able to issue new card as they sourced significant number from Marstercard.

The issuance of new cards through another payment gateway would take 2-3 months because it involves technology integration and other modalities, it had said.

“Among credit card issuers including co-brand partners, RBL Bank, Yes Bank and Bajaj Finserv lending are most impacted, in our view, as their entire card schemes are allied with Mastercard,” the report said.

As per the report, RBL Bank, Yes Bank and Bajaj Finserv were fully dependent on Mastercard for card issuance while dependence of IndusInd Bank, ICICI Bank and Axis Bank varied from 35 per cent to 40 per cent.

Card-issuing arm of State Bank of India, SBI Card, has only 10 per cent of their card tied up to the banned Mastercard. On the other hand, Kotak Mahindra Bank”s card portfolio is entirely allied to Visa and hence won”t face any issues.

After the development, RBL Bank had entered into an agreement with Visa Worldwide to start issuance of credit cards on the Visa platform. The bank will be able to issue the new cards after technology integration which is expected to take 8-10 weeks.

The RBI action

The RBI barred Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd from on-boarding new customers across all its card products (debit, credit and prepaid) from July 22, 2021, as it failed to comply with data storage norms.

Taking action against Mastercard, the RBI said, “Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity has been found to be non-compliant with the directions on Storage of Payment System Data.”

However, the RBI’s directions will not impact existing customers of Mastercard.

Mastercard became the third major Payment System Operator on which restrictions have been imposed for non-compliance with RBI”s direction on Storage of Payment System Data.

Earlier, the RBI had restricted American Express Banking Corp and Diners Club International Ltd from onboarding new domestic customers on to their card networks from May 1 for violating data storage norms.

Mastercard is a payment system operator authorised to operate a card network in the country under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (PSS Act).

In terms of the RBI’s circular on Storage of Payment System Data on April 6, 2018, all system providers were directed to ensure that within a period of six months the entire data relating to payment systems is stored only in India.

They were also required to report compliance to the RBI and submit a board-approved system audit report conducted by a CERT-In-empanelled auditor within specified timelines.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI gives Ind Bank Housing time till December to complete revival process, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank has asked Ind Bank Housing Ltd to complete its revival process by the end of December and submit a board-approved plan.

State-owned Indian Bank is the promoter of Ind Bank Housing with 51 per cent stake in the company.

“On our request, RBI has given us time up to December 31, 2021 for completing the revival process of the company and to submit board approved plan for revival,” Ind Bank Housing said in a regulatory filing on Friday.

The company had reported a net loss of Rs 6.36 lakh in the quarter ended June 2021, which widened from Rs 4.38 lakh loss in the same period a year ago.

The company’s total revenues were Rs 6.39 lakh during the period, down from Rs 8.33 lakh.

In its annual report 2019-20, Ind Bank Housing said it has put in place an aggressive recovery mechanism for realisation of existing home loans.

As of March 31, 2020, it had only one employee on direct rolls, while others were engaged on contractual basis or deputed from the parent organisation, it said in the report.

In 2020-21, the company had a net loss of Rs 18.87 lakh. During FY20, the company had a profit of Rs 2.74 crore. After appropriating the profit, the accumulated losses of the company stood at Rs 134.83 crore as at March 31, 2020 as against Rs 137.58 crore a year ago, it said in its annual report.

Ind Bank Housing said it is making efforts for revival of its operations and has prepared a road map for restructuring of capital and restarting of lending operations. However, the efforts have been delayed due to the COVID-19 situation, it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to meet CEOs of public sector banks on August 25, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is scheduled to meet heads of public sector banks (PSBs) on August 25 to review financial performance of the lenders and progress made by them to support the economy battered by COVID-19 pandemic.

Given the importance of the banking sector in generating demand and boosting consumption, sources said the meeting with the MD and CEOs of PSBs is considered important.

Recently, the Finance Minister said the government is ready to do everything required to revive and support economic growth hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Growth will be given its importance. Growth will be pushed both by the Reserve Bank and by us…,” she had said.

Interestingly, this would be the first physical review meeting since the outbreak of the pandemic in March last year.

The meeting is expected to take stock of the banking sector, progress on restructuring 2.0 scheme announced by Reserve Bank of India (RBI), sources said, adding that banks may be nudged to push loan growth in productive sectors.

The revamped Rs 4.5 lakh crore Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) would also be reviewed during the meeting likely to be held in Mumbai, sources said.

Besides, the Finance Minister is expected to take a stock of the bad loan or non-performing asset (NPA) situation, and discuss various recovery measures by banks, they said.

As a result of government’s strategy of recognition, resolution, recapitalisation and reforms, NPAs have since declined to Rs 7,39,541 crore on March 31, 2019, Rs 6,78,317 crore on March 31, 2020 and further to Rs 6,16,616 crore as on March 31, 2021 (provisional data).

At the same time comprehensive steps were taken to control and to effect recovery in NPAs, which enabled PSBs to recover Rs 5,01,479 crore over the last six financial years, the government informed Parliament recently.

As far as credit growth of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) is concerned, it has remained positive for 2020-21 despite contraction in GDP (-7.3 per cent) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gross loans and advances – outstanding of SCBs increased from Rs 109.19 lakh crore as of March 31, 2020 to Rs 113.99 lakh crore as of March 31, 2021. Agriculture and allied activities, micro, small and medium enterprises, housing and auto have witnessed a year-on-year growth of 12.3 per cent, 8.5 per cent, 9.1 per cent and 9.5 per cent, respectively, during the year.

Notwithstanding economic disruptions caused by the pandemic, PSBs have managed to raise a record Rs 58,700 crore from markets in 2020-21 through a mix of debt and equity to enhance capital base. As a result capital to risk weighted assets ratio rose to 14.04 per cent as of March 31, 2021, as against regulatory requirement of 10.875 per cent boosting the ability of PSBs to further increase lending.

As a result, PSBs in aggregate recorded a profit of Rs 31,816 crore, highest in five years, despite 7.3 per cent contraction in economy in 2020-21.

The primary reason for PSBs to post such a Rs 57,832-crore turnaround from a loss of Rs 26,015 crore in 2019-20 to a combined profit of Rs 31,816 crore was the end of their legacy bad loan problem.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI cancels Karnala Bank licence, another fined, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday cancelled the licence of Karnala Nagari Sahakari Bank, Panvel. RBI said that on liquidation, every depositor will receive deposit insurance claim amount up to Rs 5 lakh from Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC). DICGC cover will entitle 95% depositors to receive full amounts of their deposits.

RBI on Friday also imposed a penalty of Rs 25 lakh on Greater Bombay Cooperative Bank, citing non-compliance with guidelines on monitoring for fraud.

Following licence cancellation, Karnala Bank will cease to do business from the close of business hours on August 13. “The commissioner for cooperation and registrar of cooperative societies, Maharashtra, was requested to issue an order for winding up the bank and appointing a liquidator for the bank,” RBI said.

It said the lender did not have capital and earning prospects and did not comply with provisions of section 11(1) and section 22 (3) (d) read with section 56 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DICGC Act amendment may encourage merger of weak UCBs with stronger banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


To facilitate the reconstruction of a weak bank or its amalgamation with another bank, the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) can henceforth defer or vary the time limit for receipt of repayments due to it from the insured bank or the transferee bank.

The aforementioned clause has probably been incorporated in the DICGC (Amendment) Act, 2021, so the monies the Corporation pays (up to the deposit insurance limit of ₹5 lakh per depositor) to the depositors of sick banks under “direction, prohibition, order or scheme (of amalgamation)” can be recovered at a later date.

This may encourage the takeover of weak banks, especially in the urban co-operative banking sector, by stronger banks.

Since April 1, 2015, 52 weak urban co-operative banks (UCBs), including the Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank (Mumbai), Kapol Co-operative Bank (Mumbai), Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank (Bengaluru), and Rupee Co-operative Bank (Pune), have been placed under All Inclusive Directions (AID), according to the Reserve Bank of India’s latest annual report.

“The Corporation may defer or vary the time limit for receipt of repayments due to it from the insured bank or the transferee bank (into which transferor bank is amalgamated), as the case may be, for such period and upon such terms, as may be decided by the Board in accordance with the regulations made in this behalf,” per the amendment.

Before deciding on the aforementioned course of action, DICGC’s Board will “assess the capability of the bank to make repayment to the Corporation and for prohibition of specified other classes of liabilities from being discharged by the insured bank or the transferee bank till such time as repayment is made to the Corporation”.

Encourage amalgamation of sick UCBs

This important amendment to the DICGC Act coupled with the amendment to Section 45 of the Banking Regulation (BR) Act (enabling RBI to reconstruct — including via mergers, acquisitions and takeovers or demergers — or amalgamate a bank, with or without implementing a moratorium, with the approval of the Central Government) should augur well for the UCB sector, aiding reconstruction/amalgamation of weak banks.

As per the ‘Amalgamation of Urban Cooperative Banks, Directions, 2020’, issued in March 2021 by RBI, it may consider proposals for merger and amalgamation among UCBs under three circumstances, including when the net worth of the amalgamated bank is positive, and the amalgamating bank assures to protect entire deposits of all depositors of the amalgamated bank.

The second circumstance for considering proposals are when the net worth of amalgamated bank is negative, and the amalgamating bank, on its own, assures to protect deposits of the depositors of the amalgamated bank.

The third circumstance is when the net worth of the amalgamated bank is negative and the amalgamating bank assures to protect the deposits of all depositors of the amalgamated bank, with the financial support from the State government extended upfront as part of the merger.

RBI’s annual report has emphasised that speeding up the resolution of weak UCBs which are under AID is an ongoing process and the possibilities of using amended provisions of the BR Act are under examination.

If the restrictions on payment to depositors are removed by the RBI at any time before payment to depositors by the Corporation, and the insured bank or the transferee bank is in a position to make payments to its depositors on demand without any restrictions, the Corporation shall not be liable to make payment to the depositors of such insured bank, per the amendment.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Unbundling of banking services is a reality, says MK Jain, RBI Deputy Governor

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Unbundling of banking services is a reality, changing how banks operate and testing their adaptive capacity, according to MK Jain, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India.

Jain cautioned that they might be marginalised very soon unless traditional firms adapt to new ways of doing business.

“Even as banks’ reliance on technology has grown by leaps and bounds, technology is also revolutionising the competitive landscape in the financial system.

“Entry of BigTech firms and innovative Fintech players into the traditional domain of banks has already revolutionised the way financial transactions are carried out,” the Deputy Governor said in a speech at India International Centre, New Delhi.

Jain observed that even while individual entities adapt to the new competitive landscape, it is imperative to ensure that heterogeneity is preserved at the system level.

“A homogenous financial system will be less resilient and prone to systemic crisis if the underlying economic conditions change.

“Hence, it is important that the financial system consists of entities which follow different business models even while adapting to the newer ways of doing business,” he said.

Lemon problem

The Deputy Governor underscored that reducing the incidence of ‘lemon problem’, whereby the lender cannot distinguish between the borrowers of good quality and bad quality (the lemons), is an important feature of building resilience in the financial system and improving the credit flow.

The lemon problem results in making the loan at an interest rate that reflects the average quality of the good and bad borrowers.

“The result is that high-quality borrowers will be paying a higher interest rate than they should because low-quality borrowers pay a lower interest rate than they should.

“One result of this lemons problem is that some high-quality borrowers may drop out of the market, with what would have been profitable investment projects not being undertaken,” Jain said.

The ‘lemons problem’ also impedes banks’ ability to anticipate risk build-up in lenders portfolios.

The Deputy Governor noted that borrowers are probably the first to see early signs of difficulties in their respective segments. When they do not pass on the information to their lenders, fearing that the lender may refuse new loans or tighten the conditions of existing loans, lenders’ ability to identify risks early is severely hampered.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Analysts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank may be hitting the end of its tolerance for high inflation and will most likely hike interest rates in the first half of 2022, analysts said on Friday.

The central bank will also start rolling back its accommodative policies which have led to easy liquidity conditions, they said.

The view from analysts came even as inflation cooled down to 5.6 per cent for July, after two months of breaching the upper end of the RBI‘s tolerance band of 6 per cent.

The central bank has been keeping the status quo on policy and continuing with the accommodative stance to help revive GDP growth.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had on Thursday opined that the current conditions do not warrant withdrawal of the accommodative measures.

“The RBI has been tolerant of inflation and has stayed accommodative to support growth given the deep hit suffered by the economy. But it appears to be reaching the end of tether as inflation remains elevated,” rating agency Crisil said.

“If this pressure (on inflation) continues and systemically important central banks, especially the (US) Fed, begin normalising, the RBI will start to roll back accommodation. We expect the RBI to make a more definitive statement by this fiscal end, and raise rates by 0.25 per cent,” it added.

Its peer Acuite said it expects policy normalisation to begin in a gradual fashion with comfort on vaccination, clarity on fiscal stance, and global rates setting and called the increase in the quantum of variable reverse repo auctions as the first small step towards the same objective.

Next, the central bank can look at increasing the reverse repo rate by 0.40 per cent to narrow the difference between repo and reverse repo rate to 0.25 per cent by February 2022, it said, adding that the repo will be unchanged at 4 per cent.

In parallel, the vaccination drive is expected to lead to herd immunity and thereafter, the RBI will follow up with a 0.25 per cent rate hike in April 2022, it said.

Analysts at Japanese brokerage Nomura said last week’s review had signs of RBI policy pivoting towards normalization, pointing out to one of the members of the monetary policy committee also dissented against the “accommodative stance” and the increase in FY22 headline inflation target to 5.7 per cent.

“The August policy meeting already bore initial signs of a policy pivot via calibrated liquidity normalisation. We believe this will be followed by the phasing out of durable injectors of liquidity, a 0.40 per cent reverse repo rate hike (in December quarter) and 0.75 per cent of repo/reverse repo rate hikes in 2022,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI slaps ₹1 crore penalty on Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A.

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1- crore on Coöperatieve Rabobank UA. Its Mumbai Branch is a part of the Netherlands-based Rabobank Group.

The penalty has been imposed for contravention of Section 11 (2) (b) (ii) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and Reserve Bank directions on Sections 17(1) and 11(2)(b)(ii) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Transfer to Reserve Funds, the Central bank said in a statement.

Also read: Strengthen systems to monitor availability of cash, RBI to banks, White Label ATM operators

The Central bank said, “The statutory inspection for supervisory evaluation (ISE) of the bank was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as of March 31, and the examination of the risk assessment report pertaining to the same revealed, inter alia, contravention of the above-mentioned provisions of the Act and the directions issued by the RBI.

“In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for contravention of the provisions of the Act and the RBI directions, as stated therein,” the statement added.

Also read: Data localisation – protection or protectionism?

After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing and examination of additional submissions made by the bank, RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of contravention of aforesaid provisions of the Act and RBI directions was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the bank, the statement said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Samit Ghosh, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


We would have to stabilise the organisation, reverse merge and then, we will take up the universal bank licence largely because it is more efficient to operate from a capital perspective because the capital adequacy requirement in small finance bank is 15% whereas an effective capital adequacy requirement in universal bank is about 8%, says Samit Ghosh, Founder, Ujjivan Financial Services.

Ujjivan Financial Services is the holding company of Ujjivan Small Finance Bank and we have seen the small finance bank reporting losses and higher NPAs which can be attributed to the second Covid wave. But what led to such losses and when can we expect to return to profitability?
As far as the business is concerned Nitin (Nitin Chugh, MD & CEO of Ujjivan SFB) is the right person to answer this question. From our perspective, obviously the impact was because of the second Covid wave, which took a toll on our portfolio and right now it is in recovery mode. But we do not know when the next wave is going to hit because not enough Indians have been vaccinated and with the festive season coming, there could be another knock down effect on us.

We have been very concerned about the portfolio quality and the management of the portfolio business. We are closely monitoring it and this is something we have been worried about not just now, but from last year itself. We are a very conservative organisation and we always believed that we should provide upfront and take appropriate action because that has been our philosophy in the past and that is what we would like to see again.

RBI has approved the merger of holding companies with small finance banks. When do you see that happening for your company?
We complete five years in the beginning of February and we can apply three months before that. So we would be applying three months before February, around November. Once RBI clears us for reverse merger, the whole process might take between 9 and 12 months. There are hurdles not only in the RBI but also from the Sebi perspective. There are a couple of issues for which they have to give us clearance. We are keenly watching what happens to Equitas because they are ahead of us in this process and we will follow suit. But our process will start in November and once our approval is there by February, it will take another 9 to 12 months.

A lot of people are watching very closely whether or not you have the intention to become a universal bank. Is that something that you are still considering and what work is being done towards that end?
Firstly we have to reverse merge. That is the first step and it will stabilise us. We are going through a very difficult time right now, not only from a portfolio quality point of view but also from a people retention point of view. Lot of the people who actually built Ujjivan have left and that makes life more difficult for us. We would have to stabilise the organisation, reverse merge and then, we will take up the universal bank licence largely because it is more efficient to operate from a capital perspective because the capital adequacy requirement in small finance bank is 15% whereas an effective capital adequacy requirement in universal bank is about 8%. That we will take up after our own reverse merger process is over,



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 40 41 42 43 44 95