Covid resurgence will force RBI to keep the monetary tap open, bond market shows, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Central banks around the world sure have their work cut out. Just when monetary authorities were preparing the ground for a reversal of ultra-loose policies adopted in response to the coronavirus crisis, the virus, it seems, has taken new and potentially more dangerous avatars.

From bracing for interest rates in major economies to head northward sooner than later, global bond markets on Thursday took a 360-degree turn.

With a new and possibly even more deadly variant of the coronavirus being detected in South Africa, Botswana and Hong Kong, a fresh outbreak of the disease may well be on the cards. When this is coupled with a recent resurgence of Covid-19 in Europe — which has been accompanied by attendant restrictions on activity — the risk to global growth has intensified significantly.

The price action in global bond markets on Thursday showed this. Instead of getting ready for imminent policy normalisation, the bond markets seemed to be expressing the view that monetary accommodation would stay for a while longer. Yields on 10-year US Treasury papers nosedived a whopping 12 basis points on Thursday and were last at 1.51 per cent.

Clearly, investors are betting on the helping hand of central bank interventions to return.

THE INDIAN STORY
Indian sovereign bonds on Thursday enjoyed their best day in three-and-a-half weeks, with yield on the 10-year benchmark 6.10 per cent 2031 paper dropping four basis points.

Prior to the detection of the fresh variant in South Africa, a strong view in the market was that the Reserve Bank of India would start the process of raising interest rates at its next policy statement, on December 8, by raising the reverse repo rate and, therefore, narrowing the width of the liquidity adjustment facility corridor.

The central bank has already paved the way for the step as the quantum of funds withdrawn and the cutoff rates set at variable rate reverse repo operations has pushed rates on money market instruments closer to the repo rate of 4 per cent rather than the reverse repo rate of 3.35 per cent.

However, even as money markets may have aligned to the new expectation of the reverse repo rate, the act of raising it would itself have significant implications – namely that the ultra-loose accommodation is now well and truly going to be reversed. Because one would hardly expect the central bank to reverse its stance once it has officially started the process of lifting interest rates.

Now, however, market players are betting that there is a strong possibility that Governor Shaktikanta Das will keep all rates on hold and say that the central bank wishes to obtain more clarity on the global situation (and the spillovers for India) before raising any benchmark rates.

For India, another salutary impact of the new risk to global growth is a decline in international crude oil prices. Even as the government has reduced excise duty on petroleum products, the extent of the rise in oil prices over the last couple of months had emerged as a significant risk to domestic inflation, while worsening the outlook on the trade deficit.

Crude oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange slumped 3 per cent on Thursday, while Brent crude, the global benchmark, shed 2.2 per cent.

“The market’s view is changing; that is clearly perceptible from today’s move,” ICICI Securities Primary Dealership’s head of trading and executive vice-president Naveen Singh said. “There was almost a consensus that the reverse repo will be hiked, especially as market rates have aligned to a higher rate. But now there is a view that the RBI will maintain the status quo and wait for more details about whatever is happening in Africa and Europe. Because they cannot hike and then cut again if Covid were to worsen.”

While the yield on the 10-year benchmark bond may face hurdles when it comes to falling below the psychologically significant 6.30 per cent mark, for now, traders do not see it revisiting the 6.40 per cent mark, where it was hovering around a couple of weeks ago.

Hardening inflation can take a backseat for now, bond traders seem to be saying. The spotlight has once again squarely turned on protecting economic growth from what seems to be a hydra-like disease – two new heads sprout whenever one is severed.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indusind Bank’s Hindujas welcome RBI move to up promoter holding to 26%, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Hindujas, who had earlier applied to RBI seeking to increase their holding in Indusind Bank, on Saturday welcomed the RBI move to allow promoter holding of up to 26 % in private sector lenders. IIHL Mauritius, the Hindujas’ entity which is the promoter of IndusInd Bank, had applied to RBI to increase its holding to 26 % from the previous cap of 15 %, seeking parity after promoters of rival Kotak Mahindra Bank were given the permission to have their holding at 26 % after dragging the RBI to courts.

“We believe this measure of increased promoter holding will be of benefit to all stakeholders: the regulator, the banking institution and its clients, particularly at this time when Indian economy is poised for exponential growth,” Ashok Hinduja, the chairman of IIHL, said.

The RBI on Friday came out with revised guidelines on private sector banks, allowing for 26 % promoter ownership but did not go ahead with an internal working group’s recommendation to allow corporates to promote banks after protests from various quarters including former governors.

Hinduja said IIHL now awaits operational guidelines as it gives the promoters an opportunity to inject capital to increase stake up to 26 %.

The increased promoter holding will lead to enhanced financial strength of the bank and its clients will be protected, he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Regulating cryptocurrency will make it another PayTM, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There is much debate and speculation around the upcoming Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 that is one of the 26 new bills on the agenda of the Union government for the upcoming winter session of the Parliament that begins from November 29. Media reports say that the legislation will try to define cryptocurrency and any information like number, code, token that promises a price will be considered cryptocurrency. As per the reports, the Central government is also considering a ban on all private cryptocurrencies in the proposed bill. ETCISO spoke to a range of stakeholders, including the security agencies and cybersecurity leaders about the Crypto Regulatory Framework, the pros, cons, opportunities and risks.

“I feel a regulatory framework is a must, including the KYC of each investor, properly licensed exchanges that follow transparency, and a database of all credit and debit activities of crypto, otherwise this entire crypto currency world will be hacked and it will evaporate. This is a big grey area operation that provides anonymity and which is leading to the misuse of this beautiful product and technology. For the police, it is a big headache. Whom do we go to in case some heist occurs? There are currently fake exchanges, fake mining , fake wallets, etc. How to we authenticate and enforce?” says Professor Triveni Singh, SP, Cybercrime, Uttar Pradesh Police.

“The biggest issue with crypto is its misuse by criminals, nation-states and speculators. Any digital currency must be designed to be traceable, and remove risks from paper currency while replacing it. One physical rupee should be the same as one crypto rupee. If crypto currency is controlled, a major portion of the incentive to hack companies would go. Today, my guess is that criminals invest a lot of money in vulnerability and exploit research and may be more adept than even security firms,” says Lucius Lobo, Chief Information Security Officer at Tech Mahindra.

“Addition of a regulatory framework and tying it back to the financial transactions lifecycle to check for terror financing or illegal transactions should also be one of the vectors to bring in governance for crypto. And a common framework on minimum security controls and assurance framework for organizations in setting up such environment, complimented with required education and awareness for end users of the system on how to secure their crypto assets and credentials would be helpful,” adds Dilip Panjwani, Senior Director – Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) & IT Controller at Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.

Money laundering using fiat money far exceeds misuse via crypto

There is a counterview to the opinion that cryptocurrencies have aided money laundering.

“I will disagree with this. Money Laundering using fiat money far far far exceeds misuse via crypto. But agree that KYC will help. But database of all transactions is already online and public on the blockchain,” counters a senior infosec leader.

Moreover, there are voices against such regulation as well.

“If we break its anonymity and control international transfers, as recommended by the RBI governor, It’ll just become another Paytm wallet. Here’s the problem. There’s no point of a distributed/ decentralised cryptosystem being controlled by one entity, for example, the RBI.

The entire reason for its immense popularity is “no control by any central authority” via it’s technical construct,” says another top cybersecurity expert on condition of anonymity.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Former RBI executive director Lily Vadera joins HDFC Bank board, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Nov 26 (PTI) HDFC Bank on Friday said its board has approved the appointment of former RBI executive director Lily Vadera as independent director. The board of directors of the bank approved the appointment of Lily Vadera as an additional independent director of the bank for a period of five years effective from November 26, 2021, subject to the approval of the shareholders, HDFC Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Vadera, 61, has 33 years of experience in central banking. She retired as Executive Director from the Reserve Bank of India in October 2020.

As an ED of the RBI, she was in-charge of the Department of Regulation (DoR) where she dealt with the regulatory framework for various entities in the financial sector, covering all categories of banks and non-banking finance companies.

She was instrumental in putting in place a framework for a regulatory Sandbox to provide an enabling environment for fintech players to foster innovation in financial services and played a significant role in the amalgamation of banks in stress, the bank said.

She also represented RBI and played an important role as a member of the Insolvency Law Committee set up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. PTI KPM MR MR



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI accepts 21 recommendations on ownership of private banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, The Reserve Bank of India has accepted 21 out of the 33 recommendations submitted by an internal working group on the ownership and corporate structure of India’s private sector banks.

The internal group was constituted by the central bank on June 12, 2020 to review the extant guidelines on ownership and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks.

“After examining the comments and suggestions received from the stakeholders and members of the public, it has been decided to accept 21 recommendations (some with partial modifications, where considered necessary). The remaining recommendations are under examination,” the RBI said.

Among the recommendations that were accepted by the central bank was that the cap on promoters’ stake in the long run of 15 years may be raised from the current levels of 15 per cent to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank.

“This stipulation should be uniform for all types of promoters and would not mean that promoters, who have already diluted their holdings to below 26 per cent, will not be permitted to raise it to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank,” the RBI said.

The working group had also recommended a monitoring mechanism that may be devised to ensure that control of promoting the entity or major shareholder of the bank, does not fall in the hands of persons who are not found to be fit and proper. This recommendation was also accepted by the RBI.

–IANS

ad-rv/vd



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI keeps big business houses out of banking, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: Reserve Bank of India has not accepted a proposal to consider large corporates or industrial houses for a banking licence.

It has however allowed promoters of banks to hold up to 26% in their banks, which is a positive for many lenders including Kotak Mahindra Bank, IndusInd Bank, Bandhan Bank and CSB Bank. The new norms allow those who have already diluted stakes to hike their shareholding.

RBI on Friday said it has accepted 21 of the 33 recommendations made last year by an internal working group to review extant ownership and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks. A key proposal that was accepted was to increase the capital requirement for new applicants to Rs 1,000 crore instead of Rs 500 crore.

In November 2020, the Internal Working Group to Review Extant Ownership Guidelines and Corporate Structure for Indian Private Sector Banks had said that corporates may be allowed as promoters of banks only after necessary amendments to the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. This would enable RBI to have the power to do consolidated supervision of conglomerates.

It had also said that well-run NBFCs including those owned by corporate houses should be considered for bank licences. Industry insiders speculate that Bajaj Finserv, L&T Finance and Piramal might be the corporate houses still interested in pursuing bank licences. While Bajaj is active in most banking activities, Piramal has acquired DHFL as part of its goal to increase retail business and has bought in a former banker to head its financial services. L&T Finance had earlier declared its intent to pursue a bank licence.

The recommendation had faced criticism from several quarters and RBI too has been uncomfortable to allow business houses into banking. The regulator remained mum on this specific proposal but said that the proposals not accepted are under examination.

One of the proposals not accepted in full was that payments banks be allowed to convert into small finance banks after three years.

Current rules require promoters’ stake in private banks to be diluted to 15% after 15 years. According to sources, RBI agreed to this as the ceiling on the voting rights which a shareholder in a banking company may exercise has been raised by RBI in July 2016 to 26%, which is the level permitted in Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and the new limit aligns with the legislative intent. This is also consistent with the foreign direct investment policy.

Bankers said that a higher limit was required as it will enable promoters to infuse higher funds/capital which is critical for the growth of banks and function as a cushion during distress or a cyclical downturn.

Ashok Hinduja, chairman of IIHL, Mauritius, promoter entity of IndusInd Bank, said the increased promoter holding of 26% will benefit all stakeholders, particularly at this time when Indian economy is poised for exponential growth. “We eagerly await the operating guidelines as it gives the promoters an opportunity to inject capital to increase stake up to 26%,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI fines SBI, 2 payment system operators, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The RBI has imposed a Rs 1-crore penalty on SBI for contravention of the Banking Regulation Act and holding shares in borrower companies exceeding 30%.

The RBI had also imposed fines on two payment system operators — Tata Communications Payment Solution (TCPSL) and Appnit Technologies. TCPSL was fined Rs 2 crore for not meeting guidelines on white-label ATM deployment. Appnit was penalised for not following RBI norms on maintenance of escrow account balance and net worth requirement.

In a press release, the central bank said that during inspection of SBI, it was detected that the bank held shares in borrower companies, as pledgee, of an amount exceeding 30% of paid-up share capital of those companies. This is in contravention of sub-section (2) of section (19) of the Banking Regulation act.

“In furtherance to the same, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it,” the RBI said in a statement. After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing, and additional submissions made by the bank, the RBI decided that a penalty was justified.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes ₹1 crore penalty on SBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹1 crore on the State Bank of India (SBI) for contravention of a provision in the Banking Regulation (BR) Act, 1949, relating to the extent of shares a Bank can hold in borrower companies.

The central bank said this action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the State Bank of India with its customers.

Also see: ARSS Infrastructure Projects case: SEBI rejects ‘acted in good faith’ rule for SBI nominee

RBI said its statutory inspections for supervisory evaluation (ISE) of SBI with reference to its financial positions as on March 31, 2018, and March 31, 2019, and the examination of the risk assessment reports, inspection report and all related correspondence pertaining to the same, revealed contravention of sub-section (2) of section 19 of the BR Act. The contravention is to the extent that the State Bank of India held shares in borrower companies, as pledgee, of an amount exceeding 30 per cent of paid-up share capital of those companies, the central bank said in a statement.

In furtherance to this, a notice was issued to the bank advising the State Bank of India to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for contravention of the aforesaid provisions of the Act, as stated therein, RBI added.

Also see: Private bank ownership: RBI accepts recommendations of internal working group

After considering the State Bank of India’s reply to the notice, oral submissions made during the personal hearing, and additional submissions made by the bank, RBI came to the conclusion that the charge of contravention of the aforesaid provisions of the Act was substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary penalty on the bank to the extent of contravention of the aforesaid provisions of the Act.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI stays mum on allowing corporate entities to own banks, allows raising of minimum holding, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India on Friday has accepted the majority of the recommendations made by the internal working group on the review of ownership guidelines and corporate structure of private sector banks.

The central bank has accepted 21 out of the 33 recommendations made by the internal panel with certain modifications.

However, the central bank has kept under examination one of the most crucial recommendations by the internal working group pertaining to allowing corporate entities to own banks.

Among the most important recommendations accepted by the RBI is raising the long-term holding cap of promoters in private sector banks to 26 per cent from 15 per cent currently. Further, under the same recommendation, existing promoters with holdings below the 26 per cent threshold will be allowed to raise their stake.

“The promoter, if he/she so desires, can choose to bring down holding to even below 26 per cent, any time after the lock-in period of five years,” the RBI circular said.

The regulator has also modified the long-term cap on non-promoter shareholding in banks. The RBI said that long-term non-promoter shareholding will be capped at 10 per cent for natural persons and non-financial entities. However, the same for financial entities will now stand at 15 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital.

The RBI has also accepted the working group’s recommendations to allow banks that have a non-operative financial holding company structure to exit the same if they do not have any other group entities. However, the structure of NOFHC will continue to prevail for new licensees with other group entities.

In a setback for payments banks hoping to convert into small finance banks, the RBI said that the criteria of 5 years of experience as a payments bank to get an SFB license will continue along with other requirements mentioned in on-tap licensing for SFBs.

The regulator has also accepted the recommendation that will allow promoters to pledge their shareholding in the bank during the lock-in period. The central bank also said that a new reporting requirement will be brought for disclosures pertaining to pledging of holdings by bank promoters.

The RBI has also raised the minimum capital requirement for applicants for various types of banks. The initial capital for universal banks has been raised to Rs. 1,000 crore from Rs. 500 crore, for SFBs it has been raised from Rs. 200 crore to Rs. 300 crore and for UCBs transitioning to SFBs to Rs. 150 crore from Rs. 100 crore.

The central bank said that the circulars, amendments and instructions for the implementation of the accepted recommendations of the internal working group be notified in “due course”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Private bank ownership: RBI accepts recommendations of internal working group

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has accepted 21, some with partial modifications, out of the 33 recommendations of the Internal Working Group set up to review the extant guidelines on ownership and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks.

The key recommendations accepted include that the cap on promoters’ stake in long run of 15 years may be raised from the current levels of 15 per cent to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank.

“This stipulation should be uniform for all types of promoters and would not mean that promoters, who have already diluted their holdings to below 26 per cent, will not be permitted to raise it to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank,” the RBI said.

Listing in future

Small finance banks set up in future would be expected to list within eight years of commencement of operations, while universal banks would list within six years of operations.

Significantly, the criteria to assess the ‘fit and proper’ status of promoters or major shareholders as prescribed in the ‘Guidelines for on tap Licensing of Universal Banks in the Private Sector – 2016’ are appropriate and may be continued.

“Going forward, a harmonised approach may be adopted in various guidelines,” the RBI has said.

The RBI said, the consequential amendments in instructions, circulars, master directions, and licensing guidelines following the acceptance of the recommendations (with or without modifications) are being carried out and will be notified in due course.

However, during the interregnum, all stakeholders may be guided by these decisions, it further said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5 6 95