RBI extends curbs on UP-based People’s Co-operative Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai, The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has extended restrictions on People’s Co-operative Bank Limited, Kanpur, for a further period of three months from September 11 to December 10.

The bank has been under restrictions since June 10, 2020, through the directives issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS).

“The validity of the directive, which was last extended up to September 10, 2021 has further been extended for a period of three months from September 11, 2021 to December 10, 2021 vide directive DOR.MON.D-35/12.28.059/2021-22 dated September 8, 2021 subject to review,” said an RBI statement on Saturday.

Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 gives the central bank power to give directions to banks and can take action, to prevent the affairs of any banking company being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of the depositors or in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the banking company.

As per the directives, the Kanpur-based co-operative bank has been barred from granting fresh loans and accepting deposits for six months without prior approval of the RBI, due to its weak financial position.

“In particular, no amount of the total balance across all savings bank or current account or any other account of a depositor may be allowed to be withdrawn,” the RBI had said in its statement on June 11, 2020, when it had imposed the restrictions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Fintechs are paving path for greater financial inclusion in India

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Despite two waves of the Coronavirus pandemic that unleashed devastation across most areas, India has an 87% Fintech adoption rate that is substantially more than the world’s average adoption rate of 64%.

By Kapil Rana

Fintech organizations have a wide scope of business in India, particularly around payment lending, personal finance management, and regulation technologies. Needless to say, that nations’ immense population, expanding the number of web users, and the government’s endeavours to make the nation digital are bringing numerous new opportunities for Fintech and new companies. Financial organizations, new businesses, investors, and controllers are accepting Fintech and utilizing those opportunities to stand in the competition and grow fast. In recent years, India has seen the development of various new start-ups, regulators, the public and private financial institutions that have made the Indian Fintech market the fastest developing business sector in the world. 

Despite two waves of the Coronavirus pandemic that unleashed devastation across most areas, India has an 87% Fintech adoption rate that is substantially more than the world’s average adoption rate of 64%. India has witnessed 2.7 billion dollars of Fintech investment last year. This was the second largest investment close to 3.5 billion dollars in 2019 as confirmed by Professional Service Firm KPMG. Likewise, the report of Florida-headquartered ACI worldwide uncovered that 25.5 Billion constant exchanges were made in India in 2020 that is the highest in the world. 

It goes without saying that the increased adoption of Fintech technologies powered by artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), data analytics, process automation, and Blockchain has transformed the financial world. These advancements empower Fintech to run colossal measures of information through calculations designed to distinguish patterns and risk, fake practices, spam information, and make or suggest the right moves. 

FinTech organizations utilizing these innovations to assist organizations to manage and control activities like managing and controlling their finance, fulfilling tax compliance, paying and accepting bills, and utilizing other financial administrations according to the requirements. They additionally empower customers, organizations, and entrepreneurs to have a superior comprehension of investment and purchasing risk. Till today, countless new businesses and financial institutions are accepting Fintech to control and manage their financial operation and decrease their functional expense. However, still there are many difficulties and bottlenecks in the adoption of financial technologies, which are making it hard for organizations to use its benefits entirely. 

Key Challenges for Fintech Start-ups Companies

Cyber security is the biggest challenge for Fintech businesses. The risk of information leakage, malware, security break, cloud-based security risk, phishing, and identity threat is making the Fintech businesses helpless at some point or others. Such dangers are unwarranted by clients, therefore, Fintech associations need to advance their technologies, teach customers, and make powerful policies to eliminate such dangers. 

Fintech organizations work in a joint effort with traditional financial institutions in different manners like association, incubation, and acquisition, and so on. This joint effort poses many obstacles like the two players have their own arrangement of rules relating to size, productivity, and acknowledgments. Likewise, Fintech organizations are essentially intended to work with a modern working model. So, it is a bit hard for them to keep a smooth relationship with traditional banks and other financial institutions. Also, Banks fear working with Fintech as they risk losing their reliability. 

Further, banking and other monetary foundations are strictly regulated. Similarly, Fintech organizations in India should be intensely managed with policies that will assist them with moderating the possible dangers of network safety. However, many existing monetary laws and government strategies are not completely favorable for Fintech start-ups in the Indian financial sectors. 

Most of the Indian clients are still utilizing cash rather than tech-driven options like UPI transactions. Fintech is attempting to assemble a credit-only economy and this will be a significant snag for them to handle, particularly to push conventional Indian buyers to embrace digital payments. Dependency on cash, cybercrime, and poor internet services are a couple of obstacles among others that are making it hard for Fintech organizations to do business in India. 

Summarizing 

Post demonetization, the number of Fintech businesses in India has been substantially increased. These businesses are vivaciously working on different sub-areas like mobile POS (point of sale), internet banking solutions through neo banking, managing compliance-related issues on a solitary platform, credit management, and so on. Thanks to the innovative Fintech plan of action that is bringing great advancements in the fields of finance and technology to help organizations and small businesses in their processes. 

The fintech business model is working with a remarkable and consistent framework that permits entrepreneurs, business owners, and proprietors to go through huge information and make better choices in their businesses. There is no denying that Fintech is forming the future of next-generation financial solutions, and despite the way that there are a few obstacles that Fintech companies are coming across in the current business landscape, they have certainly a thriving future in India.

(The author is founder and chairman Hostbooks. Views are personal and not necessarily that of Financial Express Online.)

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Markets abuzz with global bond listing talk, but too early to bring out the champagne, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: It is no secret that there is a pressing need to increase the pool of investors when it comes to the Indian sovereign debt market.

Commercial banks, which are traditionally the largest bond holders, have seen their bond portfolios being stuffed to the brim over the last couple of years, as government borrowing has increased exponentially.

On the other hand, the Reserve Bank of India has already expanded its balance sheet considerably through bond purchases over the past couple of years as it has tried to keep a check on sovereign borrowing costs and those in the wider economy.

While the central bank has the ammunition to continue doing so, its decisions regarding bond purchases also take into account considerations such as reserve money creation and inflation dynamics.

The most viable option to broaden the pool is to lure foreign investment and on that front, there is a lot of buzz in the market.

Morgan Stanley Research in a report said the process for listing Indian government bonds in the Belgium-based clearing house Euroclear is expected to be completed by the end of 2021 and that consequently the GBI-EM and Global Aggregate Index would include Indian bonds in their index.

The resultant index flows in FY23 would be to the tune of $40 billion, followed by annual inflows worth $18.5 billion in coming years, the report said.

“This would push foreign ownership of IGBs to 9 per cent by 2031… In a bull case, foreigners could buy $27 billion a year thanks to well-controlled inflation, a well-managed fiscal deficit and gradual INR appreciation,” Morgan Stanley Research said.

The Indian government has for years been striving to have sovereign bonds listed on the global indices, but so far the plan has suffered teething problems, the latest being the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In the Union Budget for 2014-15, then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had mooted the international settlement of Indian debt.

Subsequently, in 2018, the Finance Ministry had even considered the issuance of an offshore sovereign bond for the first time ever. However, the plan was relegated to the backburner after several prominent economists including former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan flagged risks to the idea.

In the Budget for the current financial year, the government permitted overseas investors full investment in certain government securities under a plan called the “Fully Accessible Route”. The step was seen as a precursor to the listing of Indian bonds in global indexes.

The key difference between launching an overseas sovereign bond denominated in dollars or euro and listing of debt on global indices is the durability of flows (as several countries such as Greece and Argentina unfortunately realised when episodes of currency volatility and domestic fiscal factors cast a shadow on debt servicing).

When a country’s bonds are listed on international indices, depending on the weightage given to that particular nation, the flows that emanate are typically those from long-term investors such as pension and insurance funds, hence preventing episodes of volatility typically associated with short-term flows or ‘hot money’.

Morgan Stanley Research believes that with a heightened degree of overseas inflows into the Indian bond market, the sovereign bond yield curve could flatten by 50 basis points while the 10-year bond yield could trade around 5.85 per cent in 2022. The 10-year benchmark government bond was last at 6.17 per cent.

“Considering IGBs’ bond yield of around 6 per cent, it could offer 4 per cent USD return over the medium term, quite attractive to foreign investors,” Morgan Stanley Research wrote.

So far this calendar, foreign portfolio investors’ net outstanding investment in government bonds has decreased by Rs 7,150 crore, data on the Clearing Corporation of India showed. RBI sets a cap on the amount that FPIs can invest in Indian government bonds – currently at 6 per cent of outstanding stock.

Morgan Stanley Research said the increased quantum of overseas flows would bring cheer to equities and banks would benefit from the lower borrowing costs.

THE CONTRARIANS
While the talk about global listing has gained steam, there is a lot left to be done, according to sources who spoke to ETMarkets.com.

The main sticking point, according to sources, is how the government will negotiate taxation issues surrounding capital gains. “The offshore view is that no flows will come before September 2022,” a foreign bank source with direct knowledge of the matter said.

“Optimistically speaking, if everything happens according to plan, then the first flows will hit us in September 2022, but the first flows will be very small. On Euroclear, there has been no progress. On the taxation front the Indian government is not budging. So Euroclear is a long time away,” the source said.

Even if one were to view the matter through an optimistic prism, going by previous negotiations with global clearing houses such as Clearstream and Euroclear, the technicalities of the process would ensure that actual capital flows only arrive quite some time after the listing is launched.

What India has on its side is stable inflation when viewed from the perspective of the last six-seven years, a fiscal deficit that has not spiralled beyond control and a stable currency (year-to-date in 2021, the rupee has appreciated 4 per cent against the US dollar).

For FPIs, these are the key drivers to look out for.

In a recent interview with ETMarkets.com, Bank of America’s India Country Treasurer Jayesh Mehta said he does not expect government borrowing to meaningfully drop from the current level before 2024.

The government, does, however need a fresh source to finance its burgeoning budget deficit. The question is, exactly when?



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI develops escalation matrix for redressal of complaints of SGB investors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has drawn up an escalation matrix for redressal of customer complaints of investors of Sovereign Gold Bond (SGB).

The central bank said nodal officer/s of the Receiving Office (RO), which include public sector banks and some private sector banks, will be the first point of contact for attending to the queries/complaints of their customers.

In case the issue is unresolved, an escalation matrix at the ROs will be used to resolve customer grievance.

“The investor may approach Reserve Bank of India at sgb@rbi.org.in if no reply is received from the RO within a period of one month of lodging the complaint or the investor is not satisfied with the response of the RO,” RBI said in a statement.

SGBs are government securities denominated in grams of gold. They are substitutes for holding physical gold.

Investors have to pay the issue price in cash and the bonds are redeemed in cash on maturity. The bond is issued by RBI on behalf of the Union government.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI streamlines process for redressal of complaints related to Sovereign Gold Bond, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: The Reserve Bank on Thursday said it has streamlined the process for redressal of investors complaints related to Sovereign Gold Bond to make it more effective. The sovereign gold bond scheme was launched in November 2015 to reduce the demand for physical gold and shift a part of the domestic savings — used for the purchase of gold — into financial savings.

To streamline the customer complaint handling process and make it more effective, the RBI said the nodal officer of the Receiving Office (RO) will be the first point of contact for attending to the queries/ complaints of their customers.

Receiving Offices refer to banks, Stock Holding Corporation of India Limited (SCHIL), designated Post Offices, and recognised stock exchanges (NSE and BSE).

In case the issue is unresolved, an escalation matrix at the ROs will be used to resolve customer grievance, the Reserve Bank said.

“The investor may approach Reserve Bank of India at sgb@rbi.org.in if no reply is received from the RO within a period of one month of lodging the complaint or the investor is not satisfied with the response of the RO,” the central bank said.

The price of the bond is fixed in Indian Rupees based on a simple average closing price of gold of 999 purity, published by the India Bullion and Jewellers Association Limited for the last 3 working days of the week preceding the subscription period.

Sovereign Gold Bond is denominated in multiples of gram (s) of gold with a basic unit of 1 gram. The tenor of the bond will be for eight years with an exit option after the 5th year to be exercised on the next interest payment dates.

The minimum permissible investment is 01 gram of gold. The maximum limit of subscription is 4 KG for individuals, 4 Kg for HUF and 20 Kg for trusts and similar entities per fiscal (April-March).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Time taken to admit a case to NCLT needs to come down, says RBI Governor

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das on Thursday said there is scope for improvement in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) so that the time taken to admit a case to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is reduced.

In this regard, there is perhaps need for certain legislative amendments also, Das said in an interaction with Financial Times – Indian Express.

The RBI has made some suggestions to the government on the same.

“For example, it takes a lot of time to admit a case to the NCLT. So, can we deal with this issue through some legal amendments…. So, there is scope for some improvement. And the time taken in the whole process needs to be reduced by simplifying certain procedures,” the Governor said.

Average recovery and haircut

On lenders taking almost 90 per cent haircut in some of the IBC resolutions, Das observed that while the percentage of recovery is an important factor, the primary objective of the Code is resolution of bad assets — wherever possible to resolve the business so that the company/ business continues its operations and the economic value which the business creates continues unabated.

The Governor emphasised that the intention is that if a business or a company continues, economic activity continues and jobs also remain protected.

“The average recovery under the IBC was about 45 per cent for the previous four-five years. It came down to 40 per cent, taking into account the pandemic year.

“Now, yes, in some cases the haircut has been 90 per cent but there are cases where the haircut has been much less,” Das said.

NPAs quiet manageable

The Governor underscored that according to the numbers that RBI has, currently, the non-performing asset (NPA) numbers of lenders look quiet manageable.

“For example, at the end of June 2021, for the banking sector, the Gross NPA was about 7.5 per cent (of gross advances) and for the NBFC sector, it was a little less than that.

“.…At the moment, the situation on the stressed assets front, looks well within manageable limits,” Das said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UCO Bank out of PCA, will RBI blink in case of IOB, Central Bank?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has removed UCO Bank from its Prompt Corrective Action Framework (PCAF) but the fate of Central Bank and Indian Overseas Bank hangs in balance.

The central bank lifted the PCA on Uco Bank following improvement in various parameters and a written commitment that the state-owned lender will comply with the minimum capital.

However, RBI had reservations over the capital adequacy levels of the banks under PCA.

Interestingly, Indian Overseas Bank and Central Bank were reported to be among the four banks shortlisted by the government for privatisation.

The RBI objection

In FY21, the government infused Rs 20,000 crore in ve banks through the instruments. Central Bank of India was the biggest beneficiary with Rs 4,800 crore, followed by Indian Overseas (Rs 4,100 crore), UCO Bank (Rs 2,600 crore).

However, the RBI had raised questions over the government’s bank capital infusion programme through non-interest-bearing bonds, according to a report.

The RBI reasoned that capital infusion through bonds cannot be taken at face value and, therefore, these banks may still be short of regulatory capital, they said. In such a situation, they will continue under the PCA framework. Under the PCA regime, business restraints are imposed on struggling banks until they regain health.

The government went ahead despite RBI’s initial reservations and now the regulator had expressed serious concerns. The entire fund infusion through such bonds will then not count toward regulatory capital.

RBI is not inclined to pull these lenders out of the PCA framework based on such capital infusion and may further direct lenders to recalculate their capital adequacy ratio based on the actual value of the bonds.

The PCA status

Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank have reported net non-performing assets (NPAs) below levels that trigger PCA. However, on the proforma net NPA front, Central Bank falls short as its NNPA is 6.58% against the 6% required to be out of PCA.

Even after PCA exit, these banks may still be under RBI watch. In the case of IDBI Bank, which has committed to comply with the norms of minimum regulatory capital, net NPA and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis, RBI has said the lender would be under continuous monitoring. “It has been decided that IDBI Bank be taken out of PCA framework, subject to certain conditions and continuous monitoring,” RBI had said.

Privatisation bid

Four banks on the privatisation shortlist included Bank of Maharashtra, Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank and the Central Bank of India.

Two public sector banks and one general insurance company are expected to be disinvested this year in addition to the divestment of IDBI Bank, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced during the Union Budget presentation.

Bringing the banks out of PCA could boost their valuations in the event of privatisation.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI penalises 2 co-op banks for deficiencies in regulatory compliance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday said it has imposed penalties on two cooperative banks for deficiencies in certain regulatory compliance.

A penalty of Rs 5 lakh has been imposed on The Swasakthi Mercantile Cooperative Urban Bank, Vijayawada, for contravention of/ non-compliance with certain provisions of the directions issued under a 2015 circular on ‘Board of Directors- UCBs’.

In another statement, the RBI said a penalty of Rs 40,000 has been imposed on Shikshak Sahakari Bank, Nagpur, for non-compliance with regulatory directions contained in the directive on ‘Membership of Credit Information Companies (CICs)’ and the provisions of Credit Information Companies Rules, 2006.

In both cases, however, the central bank said the action on the lenders was based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by them with their customers.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI takes UCO Bank out of PCA framework

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has decided to take UCO Bank out of the prompt corrective action (PCA) restrictions.

This is subject to certain conditions and continuous monitoring.

With this, only two public sector banks – Central Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank – remain under RBI’s PCA framework.

High NPA and negative ROA

The Kolkata-headquartered public sector bank was put under PCA framework in May 2017 on account of high net non-performing assets and a negative return on assets.

Also see: RBI tweaks guidelines for card-tokenisation services

The RBI, in a statement, said the performance of the UCO Bank currently under the PCA framework of RBI, was reviewed by the Board for Financial Supervision. It was noted that as per its published results for the year ended March 31, 2021, the bank is not in breach of PCA parameters.

“The bank has provided a written commitment that it would comply with the norms of minimum regulatory capital, net NPA, and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis and has apprised the RBI of the structural and systemic improvements it has put in place which would help the bank in continuing to meet these commitments,” the central bank said.

Early intervention

PCA is a structured early intervention and resolution initiated by RBI for banks that become undercapitalised due to poor asset quality or vulnerable due to loss of profitability.

PCA entails restrictions on dividend distribution or remittance of profits, requirement on promoters to bring in more capital, restrictions on branch expansion, higher provisioning requirement, and restrictions on management compensation.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI lifts Prompt Corrective Action restrictions on UCO Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


FILE PHOTO: The Reserve Bank of India seal is pictured on a gate outside the RBI headquarters in Mumbai, India, February 2, 2016. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

The Reserve Bank of India today lifted Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) restrictions on UCO Bank, after the Board of Financial Supervision reviewed the financials of the bank, the central bank said in a statement.

The central bank said UCO Bank provided a written commitment that it would comply with the norms of Minimum Regulatory Capital, Net Non Performing Assets and Leverage ratio on an ongoing basis.

UCO Bank will, however, be continuously monitored by the RBI.

Earlier in June, UCO Bank Managing Director Chief Executive Officer AK Goel said that he was hopeful that the central bank would lift PCA restrictions on the bank.

PCA is triggered when banks breach regulatory norms such as return on asset, minimum capital, among others.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 30 31 32 33 34 95