RBI to identify vulnerabilities in business models of supervised entities’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday published its ‘Statement of Commitment to Support Greening India’s Financial System – Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)’ whereby it will explore how climate scenario exercises can be used to identify vulnerabilities in supervised entities’ (SEs) balance sheets and integrate climate-related risks into financial stability monitoring.

Identifying vulnerabilities

The central bank will also identify vulnerabilities in SEs’ business models and gaps in capabilities for measuring and managing climate-related financial risks.

As part of its Statement of Commitment to Support Greening India’s Financial System-NGFS, the RBI said it will build awareness about climate-related risks among regulated financial institutions and spread knowledge about issues relating to climate change and methods to deal with them accordingly.

The central bank’s commitment takes into account national commitments, priorities and complexity of the financial system.

The RBI had joined the Central Banks and Supervisors NGFS as a member on April 23, 2021, to benefit from the membership of NGFS by learning from and contributing to global efforts on green finance.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI panel spells out norms to streamline functioning of ARCs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The performance of asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) in management of stressed assets of banks/financial institutions (FIs) since inception in 2003 is still uneven on several parameters, according to a Reserve Bank of India’s Committee to Review the Working of Asset Reconstruction Companies.

Overall recovery made by the ARC sector during FY04-FY13 was 68.6 per cent when measured in terms of redemption of Security Receipts (SRs), which are issued by ARCs as part of securitisation of assets acquired, as a percentage of total SRs issued, the report said.

However, the same comes down to 14.29 per cent when the redemption is measured in terms of the book value of the assets acquired.

RBI panel favours sale of stressed assets by lenders at early stage

“This implies that banks and other investors could recover only about 14 per cent of the amount owed by their borrowers,” the committee headed by Sudarshan Sen, former Executive Director, RBI, said.

The total SRs issued reflects the cost of acquisition for the ARCs vis-à-vis the book value of such financial assets. Redemption of SRs is a proxy for the amount recovered from these accounts.

ARCs are required to resolve the assets within a maximum of eight years of acquisition of financial assets and redeem the SRs representing the assets. Therefore, the period after FY13 has SRs for which resolution is still underway.

Winds of change in the stressed assets market

Business revival

The committee observed that ARCs’ performance in ensuring revival of businesses has also been poor. The data indicate that approximately 80 per cent of the recovery for the sector, so far, has come through deployment of methods of reconstruction that do not necessarily lead to revival of business.

“ARCs have rarely used methods such as change in or takeover of the management of the business of the borrower or conversion of debt into equity in a borrower’s company,” the panel said.

Rescheduling of payment of debts was also involved only in 19.9 per cent of the recovery made by ARCs.

The committee underscored “The overall performance of ARC Sector has left much to be desired. However, it would be incorrect to assume that the problems of ARC sector are entirely of its own making. In fact, the ageing of NPAs before their sale may be contributing to poor recovery. This gets further aggravated by lack of debt aggregation.”

Revival of stressed business typically requires additional funding which is difficult to come by for old NPAs.

“Inadequate capital at ARC level and the regulatory prescription limiting the extent of funds that could be raised, from external investors through securitisation, seems to have made ARCs’ attempt at revival of businesses even more difficult. ARCs’ lack of skill sets in turning around borrowers cannot be ignored,” the committee said.

The panel emphasised that despite the reshaping of the ecosystem available for lenders for handling of stressed assets and the ARC sector’s sub-optimal performance and its challenges, the ARC model remains relevant as a private sector led permanent institutional framework for out-of-court resolution of stressed assets of the financial sector.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI spells out rules for a bank to exit prompt corrective action framework, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has modified the prompt corrective action plans for weaker banks with it laying down criteria for a bank to exit the framework once its financial metrics improve. It has also removed the profitability parameter for invoking the regulatory action.

The revised framework will be effective from January next year. The existing one has been in vogue since April 1, 2017. Under the existing rules, as many as 12 banks were placed under restrictions after they crossed the tolerance threshold. Barring one, all banks have exited the framework over the last two years but no uniform policy was applied for their exit. For example, RBI removed PCA from Bank of India and Bank of Maharashtra in January 2019 after their net non-performing assets ratio fell below the risk threshold of 6%.

But they were not profitable when the restrictions were lifted. In contrast, the erstwhile Oriental Bank of Commerce was profitable but its NPA was higher than 6% at the time PCA was removed from it. With the introduction of the structured exit policy, RBI has tried to address this anomaly. Under the existing framework, RBI invokes PCA if a bank makes net loss for consecutive financial years.

This clause has been removed in the revised guidelines. Once a bank is placed under PCA, taking the bank out of PCA framework and /or withdrawal of restrictions imposed under it will be considered if no breaches in risk thresholds in any of the parameters are observed as per four continuous quarterly financial statements, one of which should be audited annual financial statement, RBI said Tuesday.

However, any exit from the framework would depend on RBI’s supervisory comfort of the RBI and assessment on sustainability of profitability of the bank. The regulator has also tweaked the capital norm and leverage rules. The objective of the PCA framework is to enable supervisory intervention at appropriate time and require the supervised entity to initiate and implement remedial measures in a timely manner, so as to restore its financial health, RBI said.

“The PCA framework is also intended to act as a tool for effective market discipline,” it said. These rules however do not preclude the regulator from taking any other action as it deems fit at any time, in addition to the corrective actions prescribed in the framework, which is applicable to all banks operating in India including foreign banks operating through branches or subsidiaries.

A bank is generally placed under the framework based on the audited annual financial results. However this does not bar RBI from imposing restrictions on any bank during the course of a year in extreme cases.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI governor asks banks not to let down their guard, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI governor Shaktikanta Das on Tuesday met with bank chiefs and asked them to remain vigilant to any emerging signs of vulnerabilities and take timely remedial measures to mitigate the risks. Even as Das acknowledged the resilience of the banking sector, the central bank sought to beef up pre-emptive action against weak banks by reworking its prompt corrective action (PCA) norms to enable supervisory intervention at the right time and use of lending restrictions as a tool for market discipline.

The note of caution comes at a time when there is increased optimism in respect of the economy even as pandemic-related stress continues to be felt in some sectors. Bankers have started talking of recovery even as several countries in the world are going through a third phase of lockdowns.

Das on Monday held separate meetings with the MDs and CEOs of public sector banks and some private banks through videoconferencing. He advised banks to take timely remedial measures to mitigate the risks and maintain the stability of not only the institutions themselves but also of the overall financial system. Several other matters, including credit flows, especially to micro and small enterprises, were also discussed during the meetings.

Das sought feedback from bank chiefs on the outlook for stressed assets and measures for mitigation, pricing of risks and the collection efficiencies experienced by banks. He also asked banks about their engagement with fintech entities. This was the first meeting with banks after Das was granted a fresh three-year term by the government last week. The meeting was attended by RBI’s deputy governors M K Jain, M Rajeshwar Rao and T Rabi Sankar.

The new norms for PCA come after most weak banks have exited the lending restrictions imposed by the central bank under its earlier framework for early corrective action. A record number of 11 banks were placed under PCA after banks saw a surge in bad loans following RBI’s asset quality review in 2016.

“The PCA framework does not preclude the RBI from taking any other action as it deems fit at any time, in addition to the corrective actions prescribed in the framework,” RBI said. Bankers said that in the past banks were placed under PCA based on their audited financial results and now the indications are that the RBI might impose the restrictions if it feels that they are required based on its supervision.

On Tuesday, RBI deputy governor Jain said that the central bank was also focusing on governance reforms. He said that banks need to put in place governance standards to be worthy of public trust.

“Being highly leveraged entities and with the interconnectedness, there must be a separation between ownership and management, so that they operate on professional lines,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI Committee, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Multiple factors have led to sub-optimal performance of the asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) in the country, said the Reserve Bank Of India (RBI) Committee.

The ARC framework was designed to allow originators to focus on their core function of lending, by removing sticky stressed financial assets from their books.

It was also designed to help borrowers revive their businesses, which protects the viable and productive assets of the economy and often ensures a better return to banks and financial institutions (FIs).

Accordingly, the Committee constituted to “Review the working of ARCs said multiple factors behind the sub-optimal performance of the sector such as vintage NPAs being passed on to ARCs, lack of debt aggregation, non-availability of additional funding for stressed borrowers, difficulty in raising of funds by the ARCs on their balance sheet, among others.”

“Also, ARCs have lacked focus on both recovery and acquiring necessary skill sets for holistic resolution of distressed borrowers.”

The RBI Committee cited data which showed that the performance of the ARCs has been lacklustre, both in terms of ensuring recovery and revival of businesses.

“Banks and other investors could recover only about 14.29 per cent of the amount owed by borrowers in respect of stressed assets sold to ARCs during the FY 2004-2013 period.”

“Similarly, data shows that approximately 80 per cent of the recovery made by ARCs has come through deployment of measures of reconstruction that do not necessarily lead to revival of businesses.”

Considering the challenges impacting the performance of the ARC sector, the Committee recommended sale of stressed assets by lenders at an earlier stage to allow for optimal recovery by ARCs.

“In this respect, the Committee highlights the need for regulatory clarification on sale of all categories of special mention accounts (SMAs) to ARCs.”

“Further, as a measure to incentivise lenders to sell their financial assets to ARCs at an early stage of stress, the committee recommends a dispensation to lenders, on an ongoing basis, to amortise the loss on sale, if any, over a period of two years.”

Besides, it called for a higher threshold of investment in SRs by lenders below which provisioning on SRs held by them may be done on the basis of Net Asset Value (NAV) declared by the ARC instead of the IRACP norms.

In addition, the Committee among other measures, recommended the creation of an online platform for sale of stressed assets.

“Infrastructure created by the Secondary Loan Market Association (SLMA) may be utilised for this purpose.”

–IANS

rv/khz/



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

New PCA framework for banks from January

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Stressed banks may be prohibited from expansion of credit portfolio and asked to restrict outsourcing activities, going by the Reserve Bank of India’s revised prompt corrective action (PCA) framework.

A bank prohibited from expansion of credit/investment portfolios under PCA will, however, be allowed to invest in government securities/other high-quality liquid investments.

As per the extant framework, the RBI can ask a bank under PCA to only restrict/reduce credit expansion for borrowers below certain rating grades, reduce exposure to unsecured borrowers, among others. But it does not prohibit expansion of credit/investment portfolios.

The RBI said it would monitor three key areas — capital, asset quality and leverage — in the revised framework and breach of any risk threshold may result in invocation of PCA. Under the extant framework, the RBI also monitors profitability, besides the aforementioned areas.

Exit from PCA

The provisions of the revised PCA framework, which will be effective from January 1, 2022, clearly specify the conditions under which the central bank will allow exit from PCA and withdrawal of restrictions under PCA.

Taking a bank out of PCA framework and/or withdrawal of restrictions imposed will be considered if no breaches in risk thresholds in any of the parameters are observed as per four continuous quarterly financial statements, one of which should be Audited Annual Financial Statement (subject to assessment by RBI).

Further, this will be based on the supervisory comfort of the RBI, including an assessment on sustainability of profitability of the bank.

The revised framework incorporates resolution of a PCA bank by Amalgamation or Reconstruction (under Section 45 of Banking Regulation/BR Act 1949).

This follows amendment to Section 45 of the BR Act, which enables the Reserve Bank to reconstruct or amalgamate a bank, with or without implementing a moratorium, with the approval of the Central government.

Per the extant framework too, a breach of ‘Risk Threshold 3’ of Common Equity Tier I capital by a bank would identify it as a likely candidate for resolution through tools like amalgamation, reconstruction, winding up, etc.

In the case of a default on the part of a bank in meeting the obligations to its depositors, possible resolution processes may be resorted to without reference to the PCA matrix.

The RBI, as part of its mandatory and discretionary actions, may also impose appropriate restrictions on capital expenditure, other than for technological upgradation within Board approved limits, under the revised PCA.

The current provisions relating to imposition of restriction on dividend distribution/ remittance of profits, promoters/owners/parent (in the case of foreign banks) being required to bring in capital, and restriction on branch expansion, domestic and/or overseas, will continue under the revised PCA framework.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI panel favours sale of stressed assets by lenders at early stage

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A committee appointed by the Reserve Bank of India has proposed that sale of stressed assets by lenders must be done at an early stage to allow for optimal recovery by asset reconstruction companies.

The committee also recommended that if 66 per cent of lenders by value decide to accept an offer made by an asset reconstruction company (ARC), it should be binding on the remaining lenders and it must be implemented within 60 days of approval.

“Data shows that the performance of the ARCs has been lacklustre, both in terms of ensuring recovery and revival of businesses. Banks and other investors could recover only about 14.29 per cent of the amount owed by borrowers in respect of stressed assets sold to ARCs during the FY 2004-FY 2013 period. Similarly, data shows that approximately 80 per cent of the recovery made by ARCs has come through deployment of measures of reconstruction that do not necessarily lead to revival of businesses,” the committee said.

Online platform mooted

Recognising the need for transparency and uniformity of processes in sale of stressed assets to ARCs, the Committee feels that an online platform may be created for sale of stressed assets. Infrastructure created by the Secondary Loan Market Association (SLMA) may be utilised for this purpose.

Further, considering the critical role played by the reserve price in ensuring true price discovery in auctions conducted for sale of stressed assets, the Committee recommends that for all accounts above ₹500 crore, two bank-approved external valuers should carry out a valuation to determine the liquidation value and fair market value and for accounts between ₹100 crore and ₹500 crore, one valuer may be engaged.

The panel has suggest that the SARFAESI Act may be expanded to allow ARCs to acquire ‘financial assets’ not only from banks and ‘financial institutions’ but also from such entities as may be notified by the Reserve Bank.

“Under these proposed powers, Reserve Bank may consider permitting ARCs to acquire financial assets from all regulated entities, including AIFs, FPIs, AMCs making investment on behalf of MFs and all NBFCs (including HFCs) irrespective of asset size and from retail investors,” it added.

The committee recommended that ARCs should be allowed to sponsor SEBI-registered AIFs with the objective of using these entities as an additional vehicle for facilitating restructuring of the debt acquired by them.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks need to design appropriate governance standards and implement internal controls: Deputy Governor, RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks, as repositories of public resources, need to design appropriate governance standards and implement internal controls to be worthy of the public trust, according to MK Jain, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India.

“It is also well-acknowledged that shareholders are driven by maximisation of the returns on their capital. But in banks, this objective is realised largely through the resources raised from depositors.

“…Being highly leveraged entities and with their inter-connectedness, there must be separation between ownership and management so that they operate on professional lines,” Jain said at an event organised by a financial daily.

He emphasised that banks enjoy the privilege of mobilising uncollateralised public deposits and operating with high levels of leverage.

“The negative externalities of banks and NBFCs are also much higher than those for any non-financial entity due to their inter-connectedness. That’s why, globally, banks are regulated and supervised very closely,” Jain said.

Tools for proactive off-site and on-site supervision

For continuous engagement with supervised entities (SEs), a web-based and an end-to-end workflow automation system will be launched shortly, the Deputy Governor said.

This has various functionalities including inspection, compliance and incident reporting for cyber security, etc. with a built-in remediation workflow, time tracking, notifications and alerts, Management Information System (MIS) reports and dashboards.

Data capabilities

Jain underscored that the data capabilities of the RBI are in the process of being further upgraded through the revamped data warehouse – the Centralised Information Management System (CIMS). This is in addition to Central Repository of Information on large Credits (CRILC) and Central Fraud Registry (CFR).

The data capabilities will encompass tools and applications for AI-ML, data visualisation and big data analytics.

As part of the forward-looking assessment of stress, the Deputy Governor noted that various supervisory tools have been designed to identify vulnerable borrowers who have less ‘distance to default’ as well as vulnerable banks based on various parameters. Early warning systems and supervisory stress testing have been made an integral part of prudential supervision.

“Many thematic assessments are also being regularly carried out to identify system-wide issues and assess ‘conduct’ practices for taking corrective actions. Data dump analysis is also much more extensively used as part of our transaction testing exercise,” he said.

Jain felt that agile and creative thinking is going to be essential in staying ahead of the digital curve when it comes to the evolution of financial services.

The Deputy Governor said, “Financial institutions would need to experiment with new technologies and tailor their products and services in alignment with business strategy and competitive considerations as well as in compliance with existing laws and regulations.”

“Leveraging on technology will also require enhanced financial investments, building expertise and capacities, proper resource allocation and further strengthening of the operational capabilities.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of India standalone net profit almost doubles to ₹1,051 cr in Q2

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank of India’s standalone net profit almost doubled to ₹1,051 crore in the second quarter against ₹526 crore in the year ago period on the back of robust growth in other income and a steep decline in loan loss provisions.

During the reporting quarter, there was a reduction in gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) aggregating ₹5,771.50 crore.

NPA position of Indian Banks indicates gradual improvement: CARE Ratings

The Mumbai-headquartered public sector bank’s net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) declined 14 per cent year-on-year (yoy) to ₹3,523 crore (₹4,113 crore in the year ago quarter).

Other income, including profit/loss on sale of assets, profit/loss on revaluation of investments (net), earnings from foreign exchange and derivative transactions, recoveries from accounts previously written off, dividend income, etc., jumped 59 per cent yoy to ₹2,136 crore (₹1,346 crore).

To ease lending, FinMin moves to boost bankers’ morale, growth

GNPA position improved to 12 per cent of gross advances as at September-end 2021 against 13.51 per cent in the preceding quarter.

NPA position

Net NPAs position too improved to 2.79 per cent of net advances against 3.35 per cent in the preceding quarter.

Total deposits edged up by about one per cent yoy to ₹6,12,961 crore. Total advances were up about 5 per cent yoy to ₹3,78,727 crore.

On a consolidated basis, including the results of four domestic subsidiaries, four overseas subsidiaries, one joint venture and six associates, BoI reported a 97 per cent jump in net profit at ₹1,073 crore (₹543 crore).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Private banks’ NPAs fall in Q2 as economy charts recovery path, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the economy opening up, the asset quality of private banks improved in the September quarter. Further, banks efforts in reducing slippages, improved collections, better recoveries from written off accounts and RBI mandated loans recast also helped banks keep a lid on NPAs.

While the year on year NPA figures of most banks were higher than the last quarter’s figures, they are not comparable as after the Supreme Court‘s stay on classifying loans that were standard as on August 31 from NPAs banks had reported NPAs under proforma figures.

The drop

HDFC Bank, India’s largest private sector lender, reported a drop in gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) to Rs 16,346 crore during July-September against Rs 17,099 crore in the preceding quarter. Provisions and contingencies also dropped to Rs 3,924.70 crore during the quarter compared with Rs 4,830.84 crore in the June quarter. GNPA ratio fell to 1.35 per cent as of September from 1.47 per cent in the June quarter. It was 1.08 per cent in the same quarter, a year ago.

ICICI Bank‘s gross non-performing assets fell to 4.82 per cent of gross advances as on September 30, against 5.15 per cent in the June quarter. Net NPAs (bad loans) also fell to 0.99 per cent from 1.16 per cent sequentially in the September quarter.

Federal Bank‘s asset quality improved on a sequential basis as gross NPA came at 3.24% as against 3.50% in the previous quarter. Its net NPA stood at 1.12% from 1.23% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ). However, the gross NPA during the year-ago quarter stood at 2.84% whereas net NPA at 0.99%. Provisions (other than tax) and contingencies declined to Rs 245 crore as against Rs 543 crore in the previous quarter and Rs 532 crore in the year-ago quarter.

Axis Bank and Kotak Bank

Axis Bank’s gross NPAs came in at 3.53% in the second quarter, lower than 3.85% in the June quarter and 4.18% in the previous year period. Meanwhile, the net NPA ratio during the quarter stood at l.08%.

Kotak Mahindra Bank’s gross NPAs during the second quarter stood at 3.19% compared with 3.56% in the June quarter. However, it was higher than 2.70% in the year-ago quarter. Meanwhile, the net NPA improved to 1.06% versus 1.28% on a sequential basis, and remained flat on a year-on-year basis.

What Crisil says

GNPAs of banks will rise to 8-9 per cent this fiscal, well below the peak of 11.2 per cent seen at the end of fiscal 2018, with the COVID-19 relief measures such as restructuring dispensation, and the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) helping limit the rise, according to CRISIL Ratings.

GNPAs as at March-end 2021 had declined to 7.5 per cent against 8.2 per cent as at March-end 2020.

With about 2 per cent of bank credit expected under restructuring by the end of this fiscal, stressed assets ― comprising gross NPAs and loan book under restructuring ― should touch 10-11 per cent (against March-end 2021 estimate of about 9 per cent), the credit rating agency said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 11 12 13 14 15 95