Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Share of private sector banks in total bank deposits continued to rise at the cost of public sector banks and stood at 30.5 per cent (29.5 per cent a year ago), accounting for about half of the deposits of financial and non-financial corporations as well as the rest of the world sectors.

Bank deposits grew (y-o-y) by 11.9 per cent during the 2020-21 (8.8 per cent in the previous year) on the back of high growth in current account and savings account (CASA) deposits; the share of CASA deposits increased to 43.7 per cent in March 2021 (41.7 per cent a year ago), according to RBI data.

Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits

Households dominate

Among institutional categories, the household sector held 64.1 per cent share in total deposits; individuals, including Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), were the major constituent of the household sector and contributed 55.8 per cent in aggregate deposits.

Bank deposits of non-financial corporations surged by 18.8 per cent during 2020-21 and their share in total deposits increased to 16.2 per cent in March-2021.

Metropolitan branches of banks, which account for over half of total deposits, accounted for 59.6 per cent of incremental deposits during 2020-21 (43.2 per cent last year).

Three major states (Maharashtra, UP and Karnataka) held one-third of total household sectors’ outstanding deposits and over 40 per cent of its incremental deposits during 2020-21, according to RBI.

Private bank deposits grow at cost of PSBs, now 30.5% of total deposits

Term deposits

With the downward shift in the interest rates on term deposits, the share of term deposits carrying less than 6 per cent interest rate surged to 69.0 per cent in March 2021 from 21.3 per cent a year ago; the interest rate bracket ‘5 to less than 6 per cent had highest concentration (36.8 per cent) of total term deposits.

The majority of term deposits were originally contracted for ‘one year to less than three years’ maturity.

The share of short-term deposits (original maturity of less than one-year) rose to 32.8 per cent (25.4 per cent a year ago); in terms of residual maturity, 75.7 per cent of the term deposits were due for maturity within one year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How did public sector banks become profitable in FY21?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman last week, while making the announcement of the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, claimed that the performance of public sector banks has improved, with just two public sector banks reporting losses.

“In 2018, just two out of 21 public sector banks were profitable. But in 2021, only two banks reported losses for the full year,” she had said.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore

From 2015, when the Reserve Bank of India conducted an Asset Quality Review (AQR), public sector banks started to make a lot of provisions in their loans. Non performing assets in the banking sector jumped 80% in FY16, according to RBI data, quoted in the July 2015 AQR.

The AQR created havoc on banks’ profitability, especially affecting state-owned banks because majority of their loans were provided to corporates.

Banks had been directed to keep increasing provisioning of accounts that were restructured from 5% to 15%, and accounts that were classified as sub-standard (first category of NPA), would slip into doubtful category if it stayed sub-standard for 12 months, attracting 40% provisioning. And if the loan is not serviced at all, the bank would have to treat it as a loss account with 100% provisioning.

Major PSBs reported record losses for the first time in the fourth quarter of FY16, like Bank of Baroda with Rs 3,230 crore and Punjab National Bank with Rs 5,367 crore.

Banks entered an NPA cycle, till 2021. The government came out with two major relief measures – recapitalisation, starting 2017, and merger of smaller public sector banks with large anchor banks.

Also read: Several NPAs transferred to bad bank may head to liquidation, cost govt a bomb

“Mergers of the banks is the step in the right direction as fewer banks with larger balance sheets would be able to compete better in the market,” said Yuvraj Choudhary, research analyst at Anand Rathi Financial Services.

In FY18, there were a total of 21 public sector banks, and as Sitharaman said, only two public sector banks reported profits – Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank.

“PSBs were reeling under corporate asset quality burden for long, more so after RBI’s AQR exercise. This was aggravated by forced mergers, which led to losses due to accelerated recognition and provisioning. Growth too decelerated as banks were busy with merger and had capital constraints,” an analyst with Emkay Global Financial Services said.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY18 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India (-) 6,547 crore
Punjab National Bank (-) 12,283 crore
Bank of Baroda (-) 2,432 crore
Bank of India (-) 6.044 crore
Central Bank of India (-) 5,105 crore
Canara Bank (-) 4,222 crore
Union Bank of India (-) 5,247 crore
Indian Overseas Bank (-) 6,300 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-) 744 crore
Indian Bank 1,259 crore
UCO Bank (-) 4,436 crore
Bank of Maharashtra (-) 1,146 crore
Oriental Bank of Commerce (-) 5,872 crore
United Bank of India (-) 1,455 crore
Andhra Bank (-) 3,413 crore
Allahabad Bank (-) 4,674 crore
Corporation Bank (-) 4,054 crore
Syndicate Bank (-) 3,223 crore
IDBI Bank (-) 8,238 crore
Dena Bank (-) 1,923 crore
Vijaya Bank 727 crore

Starting FY21, only 12 state-owned banks have remained. Six weaker PSBs had been merged with four anchor banks – Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were merged with Union Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India with Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank, and Allahabad Bank with Indian Bank.

In 2019, Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank were merged with Bank of Baroda, and IDBI Bank was recategorised as a private bank, with Life Insurance Corporation of India buying 51% stake. So far, IDBI Bank is the only PSB that has been privatised.

Mergers of public sector banks aided in reducing operation costs for the banks, but banks are not in the position to absorb any weak banks, according to analysts. “This is true even for SBI. Privatization of weak banks is the best way to weed them out,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Though mergers had caused a bit of a correction in the PSBs’ profitability earlier, mergers did not have any role to play in their profitability in FY21, analysts said.

“PSBs have turned profitable since past few quarters mainly due to healthy treasury gains and some lumpy corporate resolutions, (for eg. Bhushan Power). Impact of COVID-19 on corporate portfolio was relatively moderate, leading to further moderation in NPAs and lower incremental provisioning, which supported profitability,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Of the 12 banks, only two reported losses in FY21 – Punjab & Sind Bank and Central Bank of India.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY21 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India 20,410 crore
Punjab National Bank 2,022 crore
Bank of Baroda 829 crore
Bank of India 2,160 crore
Central Bank of India (-)888 crore
Canara Bank 2,558 crore
Union Bank of India 2,905 crore
Indian Overseas Bank 831 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-)2,732 crore
Indian Bank 3,004 crore
UCO Bank 167 crore
Bank of Maharashtra 550 crore

Sitharaman, at the press conference last week, also said that banks have recovered Rs 3.1 lakh crore since March 2018.

This was possible because sizeable recovery from lumpy corporate NPAs, by way of cash and write-offs, was expected. Some resolutions including Essar, Bhushan, were major contributors to these recovery numbers, analysts said.

Click here to read all our stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced the formation of a government-backed bad bank, National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL). The Union Cabinet has approved up to Rs 30,600 crore of securities receipts.

What is NARCL?

The NARCL has been incorporated under the Companies Act and has applied to the Reserve Bank of India for license as an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC). NARCL is basically a bad bank created by the government in the mould of an asset reconstruction company.

The NARCL will pick up bad loans above a certain threshold from banks and would aim to sell them to prospective buyers of distressed debt. The NARCL will also be responsible for valuing bad loans to determine at what price they would be sold. The bad bank would provide government receipts to banks as it takes on non-performing assets from their books.

State-owned banks will hold 51% stake, while FIs or debt management companies will hold 49%.

What is IDRCL?

Along with NARCL, the government will also set up the India Debt Resolution Company Ltd (IDRCL). The IDRCL is a service company or an operational entity, which will manage assets and loop in market professionals and turnaround experts. Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and Public FIs will hold a maximum of 49% stake and the rest will be with private sector lenders.

Background

Last year, The Indian Banks’ Association had proposed to create a bad bank for swift resolution of non-performing assets (NPAs). Following this, the finance minister in the 2021-22 Union Budget proposed the setting up of an ARC, along with an Asset Management Company (AMC), to take over the stressed debt of banks.

During the Union Budget 2021-22, Sitharaman said the bad bank will manage and dispose the assets to alternate investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

In August, IBA moved an application to the RBI seeking licence to set up the over Rs 6,000-crore bad bank. The NARCL was incorporated last month in Mumbai, following the registration with the Registrar of Companies.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore on securities receipts

The Plan

The government will not have any direct equity contribution to NARCL. It will guarantee securities receipts issued by NARCL, which will buy the bad loans from banks.

These receipts will be valid for five years, and condition precedent for invocation of guarantee will be resolution or liquidation.

NARCL is intended to resolve stressed loan assets above Rs 500 crore each, amounting to about Rs 2 lakh crore. In phase I, fully provisioned assets of about Rs 90,000 crore are expected to be transferred to NARCL, while the remaining assets with lower provisions would be transferred in phase II.

As per industry practice, it will pay up to 15% of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85% would be securities receipts.

The NARCL will acquire assets by making an offer to the lead bank. Once NARCL’s offer is accepted, IDRCL will be looped in for management and value addition.

How is NARCL different from existing ARCs?

The proposed bad bank will have a public sector character and majority ownership is likely to rest with state-owned banks.

At present, ARCs typically seek a steep discount on loans. With the NARCL, the valuation issue is unlikely to come up since this is a government initiative.

The government-backed ARC will have deep pockets to buy out big accounts, and thereby free up banks from carrying these accounts on their books.

Watch: Bad bank can be only a warehouse of bad assets, says Siby Antony

What benefit do banks get from this new structure?

It will incentivize quicker action on resolving stressed assets, and help in better value realisation. This approach will also permit freeing up banks personnel to focus on increasing business and credit growth.

As holders of these stressed assets and securities receipts, banks will receive the gains. Further, it aims to bring improvement in banks’ valuations and enhance their ability to raise market capital.

Watch: Bad bank to preserve value, timely sale of stressed assets: IBA CEO



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Heightened stress in retail, MSME segments due to Covid could weigh down banks, cautions Ind-Ra

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

India Ratings (Ind-Ra) has cautioned that heightened stress in retail and micro, small and medium enterprise (MSMEs) could push out the banking sector’s inflexion point.

The credit rating agency also said that upward movement in yield curve could weigh down banks’ profitability.

Ind-Ra observed that safe bastion retail lending has fallen as pandemic drives higher delinquencies.

Indian banks to feel the effect of Covid second wave long after infections fade: S&P Global

In the case of MSME, notwithstanding the support in the form of the emergency credit line guarantee scheme (ECLGS) and restructuring, slippages could reflect from 2HFY22.

The agency noted that the agriculture sector has seen limited impact of Covid. The incremental stress addition from corporate segment has been at low levels.

Continuing systemic support

Ind-Ra, however, has maintained a stable outlook on the overall banking sector for the rest of FY22, supported by the continuing systemic support that has helped manage the system-wide Covid-linked stress.

It observed that banks also continue to strengthen their financials by raising capital and adding to provision buffers, which have already seen a sharp increase in the last three to four years.

‘Significant impact on profitability of Indian banking system’

The agency, in its “Mid-Year Banks Outlook”, has kept its FY22 credit growth estimates unchanged at 8.9 per cent for FY22, supported by a pick-up in economic activity post 1QFY22, higher Government of India (GoI) spending, especially on infrastructure, and a revival in demand for retail loans.

For FY22, the agency estimates the banking sector’s gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) at 8.6 per cent (against 10.1 per cent forecast made in February 2021) and stressed assets at 10.3 per cent (11.7 per cent). It expects provisioning cost for FY22 to increase to 1.9 per cent from its earlier estimate of 1.5 per cent.

PvSBs: market share gains

“Ind-Ra’s Stable outlook on large private sector banks (PvSBs) indicates their continued market share gains, both in assets and liabilities, while competing intensely with public sector banks (PSBs).

“Most have strengthened their capital buffers and proactively managed their portfolio. As growth revives, large PvSBs are likely to benefit from credit migration due to their superior product and service proposition,”said Karan Gupta, Director.

The agency’s Stable outlook on PSBs takes into account continued government support through large capital infusions (₹2.8 lakh crore over FY18-FY21 and further ₹20,000 crore provisioned for FY22).

The government’s support to PSBs has resulted in a significant boost in their capital buffers over the minimum regulatory requirements, significant improvement in provision coverage to 68 per cent in FY21 (FY18: 49 per cent), overall systemic support resulting in lower-than-expected Covid stress and smooth amalgamation of PSBs, Gupta said.

As per Ind-Ra’s analysis of the impact of a reversal in the long-term yield curve on the investment portfolio of banks, it expects an adverse impact on the profitability with a 100 basis points upward shift in the yield curve.

This could impact the pre-provisioning operating profit of PSBs by 8 per cent and that of PvSBs by 3.2 per cent while for the overall banking system, the impact could be 5.8 per cent.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank employees’ pension pay-out hiked to 30% of last-drawn pay, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman detailed the way ahead for India’s public sector banks as part of her government’s EASE 4.0 policy. EASE 4.0 or Enhanced Access and Service Excellence is the Centre’s reform agenda of public banks aimed at institutionalising clean and smart banking.

Sitharaman met heads of PSBs to review financial performance of the lenders and progress made by them to support the economy battered by COVID-19 pandemic.

At the presser post launch in Mumbai, Finance Secretary Debashish Panda announced changes to the pension pay-outs of Public Sector Banks.

The changes instituted are set to increase the pension pay-out to bank employees, with all of them set to get an even 30% of their pay. The Centre has also asked banks to increase the employer contribution to the pension corpus to 14%, from the current 10%.

“Pension pay-outs to bank employees could increase to Rs 30,000-Rs 35,000 from the earlier cap of Rs 9284,” Panda said.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Key Highlights of Finance Minister’s meeting with the heads of PSU banks., BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Nirmala Sitharaman

Union Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday met with the heads of the Public Sector Banks to review their financial performance and the progress made in supporting the pandemic hit economy.

Sitharaman took note of the situation of the PSBs and their progress around the restructuring 2.0 scheme announced by the Reserve Bank of India.

“We Reviewed the annual performance of Public Sector banks and also the implementation of announcements of various COVID-19 related packages and Aatmanirbhar Bharat package,” FM Nirmala Sitharaman said.

The minister also declared the results of Ease 3.0 (Enhanced Access and Service Excellence) Index for 2020-21 and launched the Ease 4.0.

Ease is a common reform agenda for PSBs aimed at institutionalising clean and smart banking.

This is the first meeting of the Finance Minister with the heads of PSBs since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Following are the key highlights

From Nirmala Sitharaman, Finance Minister

  • Nature of banking is evolving rapidly, and the industry has realised the changing requirements of the sector.
  • Collectively, PSBs have done well and have shown that they are in a position to come to the market and raise funds.
  • Despite the customer requirements during COVID-19 pandemic, work of amalgamation of banks has not suffered.
  • Banks & financial services have been identified as strategic sectors. Govt will have a bare minimum presence.
  • Industries have the option of raising funds outside the banking sector.
  • There will be credit outreach in every district of the country this year.
  • Banks have been asked to come up with special plans for northeast states focusing on logistics, exports from the area.
  • Banks expressed concerns about CASA deposits piling up in eastern areas including Bihar, WB, Jharkhand. Banks should provide facilities to provide credit flow for business development in these regions.
  • Requested the public sector banks to address the needs of exporters. They have been directed to interact regularly with Federation of Exporters Organisation.
  • Banks are raising funds from different avenues. This new aspect needs to be studied to target credit where it is needed.
  • Customer Service of banks has not suffered even during the pandemic.
  • Sunrise sectors and fintech need banking support.
  • Fintech can provide technological help to banks. Fintechs and the banking sector can mutually benefit each other.

From Tarun Bajaj, Revenue Secretary

  • Direct listing of companies on the overseas platforms is under consideration.

Debashish Panda, DFS Secretary

  • PSBs’ contribution for employee pensions under NPS hiked to 14 pc from 10 pc earlier.
  • Pension payouts to bank employees could increase to ₹30,000- ₹35,000 from the earlier cap of ₹9284.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to meet CEOs of public sector banks on August 25, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is scheduled to meet heads of public sector banks (PSBs) on August 25 to review financial performance of the lenders and progress made by them to support the economy battered by COVID-19 pandemic.

Given the importance of the banking sector in generating demand and boosting consumption, sources said the meeting with the MD and CEOs of PSBs is considered important.

Recently, the Finance Minister said the government is ready to do everything required to revive and support economic growth hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Growth will be given its importance. Growth will be pushed both by the Reserve Bank and by us…,” she had said.

Interestingly, this would be the first physical review meeting since the outbreak of the pandemic in March last year.

The meeting is expected to take stock of the banking sector, progress on restructuring 2.0 scheme announced by Reserve Bank of India (RBI), sources said, adding that banks may be nudged to push loan growth in productive sectors.

The revamped Rs 4.5 lakh crore Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) would also be reviewed during the meeting likely to be held in Mumbai, sources said.

Besides, the Finance Minister is expected to take a stock of the bad loan or non-performing asset (NPA) situation, and discuss various recovery measures by banks, they said.

As a result of government’s strategy of recognition, resolution, recapitalisation and reforms, NPAs have since declined to Rs 7,39,541 crore on March 31, 2019, Rs 6,78,317 crore on March 31, 2020 and further to Rs 6,16,616 crore as on March 31, 2021 (provisional data).

At the same time comprehensive steps were taken to control and to effect recovery in NPAs, which enabled PSBs to recover Rs 5,01,479 crore over the last six financial years, the government informed Parliament recently.

As far as credit growth of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) is concerned, it has remained positive for 2020-21 despite contraction in GDP (-7.3 per cent) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gross loans and advances – outstanding of SCBs increased from Rs 109.19 lakh crore as of March 31, 2020 to Rs 113.99 lakh crore as of March 31, 2021. Agriculture and allied activities, micro, small and medium enterprises, housing and auto have witnessed a year-on-year growth of 12.3 per cent, 8.5 per cent, 9.1 per cent and 9.5 per cent, respectively, during the year.

Notwithstanding economic disruptions caused by the pandemic, PSBs have managed to raise a record Rs 58,700 crore from markets in 2020-21 through a mix of debt and equity to enhance capital base. As a result capital to risk weighted assets ratio rose to 14.04 per cent as of March 31, 2021, as against regulatory requirement of 10.875 per cent boosting the ability of PSBs to further increase lending.

As a result, PSBs in aggregate recorded a profit of Rs 31,816 crore, highest in five years, despite 7.3 per cent contraction in economy in 2020-21.

The primary reason for PSBs to post such a Rs 57,832-crore turnaround from a loss of Rs 26,015 crore in 2019-20 to a combined profit of Rs 31,816 crore was the end of their legacy bad loan problem.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PSBs vacating branches open doors for other lenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The move by five public sector banks to reduce their branch numbers is proving godsend for lenders looking to expand their network.

The branches being vacated by Bank of Baroda (BoB), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Canara Bank, Union Bank of India (UBI) and Indian Bank have opened the doors to ready-made premises for other lenders. For the latter set, network expansion happens faster, at reasonable costs (as owners of these premises are desperate to rent them out) and without the hassle of re-doing interiors.

To cut down on operating expenses, the five PSBs have been merging or rationalising branches after the amalgamation of banks with them.

AS Rajeev, MD & CEO, Bank of Maharashtra, observed, 25-30 per cent of the branches opened by BoM last year were in the premises vacated by the PSBs. “The rent is comparatively less. That is why our rent outgo is not increasing despite the rise in the number of branches,” he said. BoM, which opened 82 branches last year, plans to open about 100 in FY22.

BK Divakara, CFO, CSB Bank, noted that 30-40 branches opened in 2020 and so far this year have been at premises vacated by a PSB. Divakara said the bank opened 101 branches last year and plans to open 200 this year.

CSB Bank actively scouts for ready-to-move premises being vacated by PSBs to avoid overlap of branches. These premises usually come with a strong-room (constructed to central bank specifications), counters and furnishings.

Branch rationalisation

After the amalgamation of Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank with BoB on April 1, 2019, the latter merged or rationalised 1,310 branches.

PNB rationalised about 430 branches after Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India were merged with it from April 1, 2020.

Canara Bank merged or closed 105 branches after taking over Syndicate Bank on April 1, 2020.

Union Bank of India merged or closed 275 branches after the amalgamation of Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank with it from April 1, 2020.

Indian Bank rationalised 203 branches after absorbing Allahabad Bank from April 1, 2020.

 

 

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PSBs vacating branches open doors for other lenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The move by five public sector banks to reduce their branch numbers is proving godsend for lenders looking to expand their network.

The branches being vacated by Bank of Baroda (BoB), Punjab National Bank (PNB), Canara Bank, Union Bank of India (UBI) and Indian Bank have opened the doors to ready-made premises for other lenders. For the latter set, network expansion happens faster, at reasonable costs (as owners of these premises are desperate to rent them out) and without the hassle of re-doing interiors.

To cut down on operating expenses, the five PSBs have been merging or rationalising branches after the amalgamation of banks with them.

AS Rajeev, MD & CEO, Bank of Maharashtra, observed, 25-30 per cent of the branches opened by BoM last year were in the premises vacated by the PSBs. “The rent is comparatively less. That is why our rent outgo is not increasing despite the rise in the number of branches,” he said. BoM, which opened 82 branches last year, plans to open about 100 in FY22.

BK Divakara, CFO, CSB Bank, noted that 30-40 branches opened in 2020 and so far this year have been at premises vacated by a PSB. Divakara said the bank opened 101 branches last year and plans to open 200 this year.

CSB Bank actively scouts for ready-to-move premises being vacated by PSBs to avoid overlap of branches. These premises usually come with a strong-room (constructed to central bank specifications), counters and furnishings.

Branch rationalisation

After the amalgamation of Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank with BoB on April 1, 2019, the latter merged or rationalised 1,310 branches.

PNB rationalised about 430 branches after Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India were merged with it from April 1, 2020.

Canara Bank merged or closed 105 branches after taking over Syndicate Bank on April 1, 2020.

Union Bank of India merged or closed 275 branches after the amalgamation of Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank with it from April 1, 2020.

Indian Bank rationalised 203 branches after absorbing Allahabad Bank from April 1, 2020.

 

 

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Public sector banks recover Rs 1 lakh crore from written-off accounts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public banks have recovered around Rs 1 lakh crore they had written off in the last few years, according to finance ministry officials.

There has been discussion around “write-off” of over Rs 8 lakh crore during the last seven years, the government
believes that these are technical in nature and are actually meant to bring about transparency in bank balance sheets.

The steps taken by the government over the last few years — from enacting Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code and strengthening other laws to administrative measures — have helped banks recover around Rs 5.5 lakh crore of bad debt including Rs 99,996 from accounts that had been technically written off. Banks have used multiple sources — accruals, fundraising from the market and capital infusion by the government — to comply with the regulatory requirements.

Internal accruals and market raising account for as much as 70% of the provisioning done during the last few years.

The write-offs

Public sector banks have written off a massive Rs 8 lakh crore worth of loans since 2014, more than double the capital of Rs 3.37 lakh crore infused by the government in them.

The highest infusion was in fiscal 2019 when Rs 1.06 lakh crore were infused while in 2020-21, the government put in Rs 14,500 crore into four public sector banks.

The maximum write-offs were in fiscal 2019 at Rs 1.83 lakh crore, following by FY20 at Rs 1.75 lakh crore.

Reduction in non-performing assets due to write-offs for public sector banks stood at Rs 1,31,894 crore during fiscal 2020-21.

In FY2019-20, the number stood at Rs 1,75,877 crore, the RBI said

In the last seven years, bank credit to the industrial sector dropped to 28.9% in 2021 as compared to 42.7% in 2014. Credit to the retail sector grew from 16.2% to 26.3% in the last seven years.

The comparison

The loans write-off between 2015 and 2019 were more than three times compared to the figures of bad loans written off during the previous Congress-led UPA regime from 2004-2014, as per an RTI revelation.

During the UPA’s 10-year rule, around Rs2,20,328 crore was written off by various banks, and this figure shot up to Rs 7,94,354 crore during the NDA regime from 2015-2019, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the banks’ NPAs.

The RTI reply figures around two-dozen public sector banks (PSBs), some three-dozen in the private sector, nine scheduled commercial banks, a four-dozen foreign banks, and several in each category not written off any loans.

Of the loan write-offs in the UPA decade (2004-2014), the PSBs accounted for approximately Rs 1,58,994 crore, while the private banks’ amounts were Rs41,391 crore and for foreign banks it was Rs 19,945 crore, with no write-offs by Scheduled Banks.

Later, in the NDA regime (2015-2019), the PSBs accounted for a stupendous Rs 6,24,370 crore loan write-off, with the private banks writing off Rs 1,51,989 crore and the foreign banks shared the remaining 17,995 crore, (Total—Rs7,94,354 crore), besides an additional write-off by scheduled banks totalling Rs 1,295 crore (Total – Rs 7,95,649 crore).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5 6