Govt seeks Parliament nod for Rs 1.87 lakh crore supplementary demands for this fiscal, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government sought approval for additional expenditure of Rs 1.87 lakh crore from Lok Sabha, as part of the first batch of supplementary demand for grants for FY22.

Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman laid a statement of the demands in the lower House, which amounted to a net additional cash outgo of Rs 23,675 crore, on Tuesday.

The remaining Rs 1.63 lakh crore came from savings of the various ministries and departments and through enhanced receipts and recoveries, the statement said.

The single largest demand came from the finance ministry for Rs 1.59 lakh crore as transfer to states in the form of back-to-back loans as goods and services tax (GST) compensation shortfall.

The GST compensation shortfall would not affect the central government’s fiscal deficit, making the net outgo quite modest, said Aditi Nayar, chief economist at ICRA.

Further, the additional outgo of Rs 90,000 crore for the free foodgrain provision in May-November was being absorbed by the cushion created in this year’s budget on account of the prepayment of the Food Corporation of India’s loans in FY21, according to Nayar.

“With healthy revenues amid only a modest increase in the expenditure outlay, the cash flow position of the government of India does appear to be quite comfortable, which allowed the release of the Rs. 75,000 crore of GST compensation loans from the Central Government’s own borrowings raised so far,” she said.

The department of health and family welfare which sought Rs 10,727 crore Covid-19 emergency response and health system preparedness.

The finance ministry also raised a demand for Rs 1,750 crore as compound interest support to lending institutions in relation to the loan moratorium.

The list of demands also included Rs 1,872 crore sought for loans and advances to Air India by the civil aviation ministry.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Around 1.09 crore MSME borrowers gets guarantee support under ECLGS, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Jul 19 () Around 1.09 crore MSME borrowers have been provided with guarantee support amounting to Rs 1.65 lakh crore as of July 2 this year under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS), Parliament was informed on Monday. The scheme is part of the Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan package announced by the government to mitigate the distress caused by the lockdown due to COVID-19 by providing credit to different sectors, especially MSMEs.

“As part of the Aatma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan, under the ECLGS, around 1.09 crore MSME borrowers have been provided with guarantee support amounting to Rs 1.65 lakh crore as on July 2, 2021,” MSME Minister Narayan Rane said in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha.

In another reply, he also said that as of July 2, 2021, an amount of Rs 2.73 lakh crore has been sanctioned under the scheme, of which Rs 2.14 lakh crore has been disbursed. RR BAL



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CPI writes to finance minister opposing govt proposal to privatise nationalised banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, Jul 17 () CPI general secretary D Raja wrote to Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday, hitting out against the government proposal to privatise nationalised banks. In his letter, Raja said the finance minister had mentioned in her budget speech that the government has proposed to privatise two nationalised banks.

“Since privatisation of any bank is not in the interest of our economy and people, we have expressed our strong opposition to the same, both inside Parliament and outside. Our opposition to such privatisation of banks is on account of the fact that our banks today represent huge public savings of the common masses and these precious savings are safe only if the banks are in government control,” he said.

The Left leader pointed out that a large-scale failure of many private banks was the reason behind the move to nationalise banks in the first place, adding that the government is thinking about privatisation of banks at a time when many private companies have turned out to be major loan defaulters.

“It would be imprudent to hand over the banks to private hands, whose efficiency is also not guaranteed going by the recent experiences of some of the private banks. Nationalised banks have been greatly helping and supplementing the government’s efforts to boost the economy and hence, need to be further strengthened with adequate measures from the government,” he said.

Raja said media reports have quoted a Niti Aayog recommendation proposing the names of the Central Bank of India and the Indian Overseas Bank for privatisation.

“Even though these are news items not authenticated by any official agency of the government, nonetheless, the same is creating a lot of anxiety and anguish amongst the employees and officers of these two banks.

“I have learned that even some deposits are being withdrawn by customers. Hence, it will be desirable for the government to make a statement clarifying the position,” he added.

“In case the government has any such proposal to privatise any bank, our party is opposed to it. Such a decision must be reviewed and rescinded,” the Communist Party of India (CPI) said. ASG RC



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance Ministry puts on hold examination for clerical cadre in PSU banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Finance Ministry on Tuesday directed the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) to put on hold examinations for clerical cadres in public sector banks (PSBs) till a final view is taken on conducting tests in regional languages. In order to look into the demand for holding examinations for clerical cadres in PSBs in local/regional languages, a Committee has been constituted to look into the matter in its entirety, the Finance Ministry said in a statement.

“The Committee will give its recommendations within 15 days. The ongoing process of holding the examination initiated by IBPS will be kept on hold until the recommendations of the Committee are made available,” it said. Recently, IBPS issued an advertisement for holding an examination for recruitment in the clerical cadre of PSBs only in two languages–English and Hindi.

There has been demand particularly from Southern states to include other recognised regional languages for conducting bank clerical cadre. There are 22 languages recognized by the Constitution of India.

The Finance Minister in July 2019 had assured Parliament that the recruitment examination for employment in the Regional rural banks (RRBs) would be conducted in regional languages apart from English and Hindi.

With a view to providing a level-playing field to the local youths for availing employment opportunities, the government in 2019 decided that for recruitment of Office Assistant and Officer Scale I in RRBs, examination will be held in 13 regional languages including Konakani and Kannada, besides Hindi and English.

Since then, examinations for these recruitments are being conducted in regional languages also, it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Leading crypto exchanges scout entry into India despite potential ban

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Global digital currency exchanges are exploring ways to set up in India, following in the footsteps of market leader Binance, industry sources told Reuters, while the government in New Delhi dithers over introducing a law that could ban cryptocurrencies.

Opponents of the potential ban say it would stifle the economic power of a tech-savvy, young nation of 1.35 billion people. There is no official data, but industry analysts reckon there are 15 million crypto investors in India holding over ₹100 billion ($1.37 billion).

China blocks several cryptocurrency-related social media accounts amid crackdown

According to four sources, who declined to be identified as they were not authorised to comment on private discussions, US-based Kraken, Hong Kong-based Bitfinex and rival KuCoin are actively scouting the market, which analysts say would only get bigger if it was given a free rein. “These companies have already begun talks to understand the Indian market and the entry points better,” said one source directly involved with an exchange that had begun due diligence for an Indian firm it was considering acquiring.

The other two exchanges, he said, were in the initial stages of deciding whether to enter India and weighing their options, which effectively come down to a choice between setting up a subsidiary or buying an Indian firm, as Binance, the world’s biggest exchange, did two years ago.

Cybercriminals go after cryptocurrency: Report

Bitfinex declined to comment while Kraken and KuCoin did not respond to an email seeking comment.

All three exchanges are ranked in the world’s top ten by data platform CoinMarketCap, based on their traffic, liquidity and trustworthiness of their reported trading volumes.

“The Indian market is huge and it is only starting to grow, if there was more policy certainty by now Indian consumers would have been spoilt for choice in terms of exchanges, because everyone wants to be here,” said Kumar Gaurav, founder of digital bank Cashaa.

India must take a holistic view on cryptos

Proponents of cryptocurrencies say they would be the most cost-efficient way for Indians abroad to remit funds home.

But authorities worry that rich people and criminals could hide their wealth in the digital world, and speculative flows of funds through digital channels, ungoverned by India’s strict exchange controls, could destabilise the financial system.

Caution across globe

Hitherto, India has had no rules specifically for cryptocurrency exchanges wishing to set up in the country. Instead they could register themselves as tech companies to obtain a relatively easy entry path.

In 2019, Binance acquired WazirX, an Indian cryptocurrency start-up which has allowed users to buy and sell crypto with rupees on the Binance Fiat Gateway.

US based exchange Coinbase has announced plans for a back office in India.

But with the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies taking a turn for worse globally, Indian authorities are exercising greater scrutiny.

In China, authorities have forbidden banks and online payment companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency transactions.

And the Indian government was set to present a Bill to Parliament by March that proposed a ban on cryptocurrencies, making trading and holding them illegal. But the government has held it back, and conflicting statements since have fuelled uncertainty over the Bill’s fate.

Meantime, major Indian banks have begun to sever ties with cryptocurrency exchanges and traders, amid Reserve Bank of India’s concerns about the financial stability risks posed by the volatile asset.

The RBI is looking at launching its own digital currency, but Governor Shaktikanta Das in February described those plans as a “work in progress”.

For all the uncertainty over what India will end up doing, some digital currency exchanges clearly reckon it would be better to gain entry rather than miss out.

“It’s clear that the rewards outweigh the perceived risks, which is luring these global firms to the Indian market,” said Darshan Bathija, chief executive officer of Vauld, a foreign crypto exchange with a presence in India.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

AIBEA opposes govt decision to privatise IDBI Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has opposed the government’s move to privatise IDBI Bank, terming the decision as a “retrograde” move. The association said the government should control a minimum of 51 per cent share capital of the bank.

The bank came into trouble as some private corporate houses cheated IDBI Bank by not repaying the loans taken, while the need of the hour is to take action against the defaulters and recover the money, the bank union said in a statement.

The Cabinet on Wednesday gave in-principle approval for strategic disinvestment along with transfer of management control in IDBI Bank in line with the Budget announcement earlier this year.

The central government and LIC together own more than 94 per cent equity of IDBI Bank.

“The need is to take action on the defaulters and recover the money. Unfortunately, now the decision has been taken to sell the bank to a private company. IDBI Bank is a national asset and should not be sold away in this fashion. It is a retrograde move,” AIBEA said.

If sold to a private company, the existing reservation in jobs for SC/ST category will be withdrawn, it said, adding this is social injustice to the unemployed youth of this country.

The only major problem of the bank is its huge bad loans of Rs 36,000 crore as of March 31, 2021 (22 per cent). Out of the operating profit of Rs 1,900 crore for the year ended March 2021, Rs 1,500 crore have been set off for provision for bad loans, AIBEA Secretary General C H Venkatachalam said.

“Now to camouflage these ills of the bank, the bank is being sold away. We express our strong protest against this decision and urge upon the government not to proceed with the sale of IDBI Bank,” he said.

AIBEA said bank’s deposits of Rs 2.3 lakh crore is people’s money and it should be used for their welfare and national development, not for the private corporate loot.

IDBI was started as a Development Financial Institution (DFI) in the 1960s. It was later converted as IDBI Bank much against the statute approved by Parliament earlier, it added.

It said the bank played a leading role in financing industrial development in the country.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Parliament passes Insurance Bill to hike FDI limit to 74 per cent

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Parliament has passed a Bill to raise the Foreign Direct Investment ( FDI) limit in insurance sector to 74 per cent from the current 49 per cent, with the Lok Sabha giving its nod for this legislation on Monday.

Replying to discussions on the Insurance (amendment) Bill 2021 in the Lok Sabha, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman asserted that the FDI limit hike is intended only to strengthen the insurance sector and should not be seen as government selling the family silver.

“By the enhancement in FDI from 49 to 74 per cent, private sector is going to be able to raise resources. We are not talking about the public sector here. Private sector needs to raise money. This will give them window for raising money”, she said.

The Finance Minister highlighted that financial sector (banking, insurance) has been recognised as a “strategic sector” by the government and so the public sector presence will continue.

“It is not right to say this (FDI limit increase) will close down and finish off public sector. Public sector enterprises will continue. The Public sector enterprises policy framed by the government is about right sizing the public sector and unlocking value and investment”, she added.

More resources for private sector

She highlighted that the aspiration of growing India cannot be met if more resources are not made available to private insurers.

“Insurance penetration can be improved only if greater resources are available to insurers. Government alone cannot do it all. We want to cover all Indian population. If we have to do this, then capital must be available and government also has a responsibility to look at the interests of employees working in private sector”, she said.

Sitharaman also asserted that this Bill had nothing to do with Life Insurance Corporation (LIC).

She highlighted that the number of persons working in the private sector stood at 24 lakh (both employees and agents), which is about seven lakh more than 17 lakh in public sector (employees and agents) insurers.

Sitharaman also assured the Lower House that adequate safeguards are in-built in the Bill so as to ensure that Indian policyholders’ funds remained within the country. Even one portion of the profits will have to be kept in India, she added.

Insurance penetration

She said insurance penetration rose to higher levels after 2015, when the FDI limit was earlier raised from 26 to 49 per cent. However, during 2011-14, in the absence of required resources, Indian penetration dropped from 4.1 to 3.3 per cent. “It (insurance penetration) actually comes down when enough liquidity is not available. So we have to open up. Insurance penetration is ratio between Premium and GDP. It can only increase when insurance sector grows at faster rate than GDP growth itself. During 2015-20, it grew at 74 per cent when GDP grew overall 64 per cent. This rapidity in growth has made a difference to insurance sector”, she added.

Sitharaman also noted that BJP had to oppose FDI hike in insurance sector in 2008-09 as no such safeguards — which are now being introduced in the latest Bill — were in that Bill.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Punjab & Sind Bank to allot shares worth Rs 5,500 crore to govt in lieu of capital infusion, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Punjab & Sind Bank will allot preferential shares to the government next month in lieu of Rs 5,500 crore capital infusion into the bank. An extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of the bank is scheduled on March 25, 2021 for preferential issue of equity shares to the government up to Rs 5,500 crore, the bank said in a regulatory filing.

The EGM, the bank said, will take place through video conferencing and other audio visual means for passing the resolution for issuing shares to the government.

In September, the government had approved a Rs 20,000 crore fund through Parliament, as part of the Supplementary Demands for Grants for 2020-21, for capital infusion into public sector banks (PSBs).

Of this, Rs 5,500 crore was approved to be infused into P&SB.

As far as the residual Rs 14,500 crore for capital infusion is concerned, the government has to take a call in the ongoing quarter.

Shares of Punjab & Sind Bank closed 5.07 per cent down at Rs 16.65 apiece on the BSE.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dhotre, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Over 2.9 lakh cyber security incidents related to digital banking were reported in 2020, Parliament was informed on Thursday. As per the information reported to and tracked by Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), a total number of 1,59,761; 2,46,514 and 2,90,445 cyber security incidents pertaining to digital banking were reported during 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, Minister of State for Electronics and IT Sanjay Dhotre said in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha.

These incidents included phishing attacks, network scanning and probing, viruses and website hacking, he added.

The Minister noted that the rising popularity of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) along with e-commerce has also expanded the scope of digital payments.

“The percentage rise in digital transactions is 46 per cent in 2020 in comparison to 2018-19,” he said.

The numbers of digital transactions have increased from 3,134 crore in the financial year (FY) 2018-19 to 4,572 crore in FY 2019-20, Dhotre added.

Responding to a separate query, the minister said the number of websites/webpages/accounts blocked stood at 9,849 in 2020.

This was 2,799 in 2018 and 3,635 in the year 2019.

He said Section 69A of the IT Act empowers the government to block any information generated, transmitted, received, stored or hosted in any computer resource in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states or public order.

In response to another question, Dhotre said 6,233 cases were registered in 2019 under fraud and cheating (involving communication devices as medium/ target as per Information Technology Act 2000), as per National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data.

“As per NCRB, number of cases registered under fraud and cheating (involving communication devices as medium/ target as per IT Act 2000) for cyber crimes are 3,466, 3,353, 6,233 during the year 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively,” he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finmin looks at BIC model after RBI raises concern over zero coupon bonds for PSBs recap, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the RBI raising concern over the issuance of zero coupon bonds for recapitalisation of public sector banks (PSBs), the Finance Ministry is examining other avenues for affordable capital infusion including setting up of a Bank Investment Company (BIC), sources said. Setting up a BIC as a holding company or a core investment company was suggested by the P J Nayak Committee in its report on ‘Governance of Boards of Banks in India’.

The report recommended transferring shares of the government in the banks to the BIC which would become the parent holding company of all these banks, as a result of this, all the PSBs would become ‘limited’ banks. BIC will be autonomous and it will have the power to appoint the board of directors and make other policy decisions about subsidiaries.

The idea of BIC, which will serve as a super holding company, was also discussed at the first Gyan Sangam bankers’ retreat organised in 2014, sources said, adding it was proposed that the holding company would look into the capital needs of banks and arrange funds for them without government support.

It would also look at alternative ways of raising capital such as the sale of non-voting shares in a bid to garner affordable capital.

With this in place, the dependence of PSBs on government support would also come down and ease fiscal pressure.

To save interest burden and ease the fiscal pressure, the government decided to issue zero-coupon bonds for meeting the capital needs of the banks.

The first test case of the new mechanism was a capital infusion of Rs 5,500 crore into Punjab & Sind Bank by issuing zero-coupon bonds of six different maturities last year. These special securities with tenure of 10-15 years are non-interest bearing and valued at par.

However, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) expressed concerns over zero-coupon bonds for the recapitalisation of PSBs.

The RBI has raised some issues with regard to calculation of an effective capital infusion made in any bank through this instrument issued at par, the sources said.

Since such bonds usually are non-interest bearing but issued at a deep discount to the face value, it is difficult to ascertain net present value, they added.

As these special bonds are non-interest bearing and issued at par to a bank, it would be an investment, which would not earn any return but rather depreciate with each passing year.

Parliament had in September 2020 approved Rs 20,000 crore to be made available for the recapitalisation of PSBs. Of this, Rs 5,500 crore was issued to Punjab & Sind Bank and the Finance Ministry will take a call on the remaining Rs 14,500 crore during this quarter.

With mounting capital requirement owing to rising NPAs, the government resorted to recapitalisation bonds with a coupon rate for capital infusion into PSBs during 2017-18 and interest payment to banks for holding such bonds started from the next financial year.

This mechanism helped the government from making capital infusion from its own resources rather utilised banks’ money for the financial assistance.

However, the mechanism had a cost of interest payment towards the recapitalisation bonds for PSBs. During 2018-19, the government paid Rs 5,800.55 crore as interest on such bonds issued to public sector banks for pumping in the capital so that they could meet the regulatory norms under the Basel-III guidelines.

In the subsequent year, according to the official document, the interest payment by the government surged three times to Rs 16,285.99 crore to PSBs as they have been holding these papers.

Under this mechanism, the government issues recapitalisation bonds to a public sector bank which needs capital. The said bank subscribes to the paper against which the government receives the money. Now, the money received goes as equity capital of the bank.

So the government doesn’t have to pay anything from its pocket. However, the money invested by banks in recapitalisation bonds is classified as an investment which earns them an interest.

In all, the government has issued about Rs 2.5 lakh crore recapitalisation in the last three financial years. In the first year, the government issued Rs 80,000 crore recapitalisation bonds, followed by Rs 1.06 lakh crore in 2018-19. During the last financial year, the capital infusion through bonds was Rs 65,443 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3