Banks allowed to offer interest rate on FCNR (B) deposits linked to ARR

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has decided to permit banks to offer interest rates on FCNR (B) deposits using widely-accepted ‘Overnight Alternative Reference Rate (ARR) for the respective currency’ with an upward revision in the interest rates ceiling by 50 basis points (bps).

This comes in view of the impending discontinuance of LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) as a benchmark rate.

As a measure to handle the information asymmetry during the transition, the Foreign Exchange Dealers Association of India (FEDAI) may publish the ARR till such time the widely-accepted benchmark is established, the central bank said in a circular to banks.

The RBI said the interest rates ceiling on FCNR (B) deposits of 1 year to less than 3 years shall be overnight ARR for the respective currency / Swap plus 250 bps against LIBOR/ Swap plus 200 bps now.

Further, the interest rates ceiling on FCNR (B) deposits of 3 years and above up to and including 5 years shall be overnight ARR for the respective currency / Swap plus 350 bps against LIBOR/ Swap plus 300 bps now.

Foreign Currency (Non-Resident) Account (Banks) scheme allows non-resident Indians (NRIs) and Person of Indian Origin (PIO) to open a term deposit account (for terms not less than 1 year and not more than 5 years) in India in any permitted currency — that is a foreign currency which is freely convertible.

Such accounts may be held jointly in the names of two or more NRIs/ PIOs. NRIs/ PIOs can also hold such accounts jointly with a resident relative on ‘former or survivor’ basis (relative as defined in Companies Act, 2013).

The resident relative can operate the account as a Power of Attorney holder during the life time of the NRI/ PIO account holder.

RBI said the overnight ARR for the respective currency / Swap rates quoted/ displayed by FEDAI shall be used as the reference for arriving at the interest rates on FCNR (B) deposit.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis AMC raises Rs 400 crore through first close of Axis Growth Avenues AIF, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Asset Management Company, an arm of private sector lender Axis Bank, has raised around Rs 400 crore through the first close of Axis Growth Avenues AIF – I, aiming to fund ideas with deep technology as their USP.

The asset management company is aiming to raise a total of Rs 1,000 crore through the close-ended fund, including a green-shoe option of Rs 500 crore. It is confident of completing the entire fundraising exercise in the current quarter based on the response and commitments from investors.

The fund has achieved the first close with investments from family offices, high networth individuals (HNIs) and non-resident Indians (NRIs).

The fund will be investing primarily in mid-to-late-stage technology enabled companies with scalable business models and a favourable risk-return profile. The sector-agnostic fund will be investing in companies catering to latent demands with multi-year growth potential and differentiated business model.

Axis Growth Avenues AIF – I will be exploring both primary and secondary investment opportunities with the proposed portfolio size of 8-10 companies with deal size ranging from Rs 25 crore to Rs 100 crore each.

The AMC has a strong pipeline of investments and expects to start deploying funds from the AIF soon.

“The strong response that we are receiving for the Axis Growth Avenues AIF I, reflects the confidence that investors and partners have in us as well as the potential of this segment. It will be our endeavour to ensure that we deploy this money in companies that offer exciting long term growth opportunities and are aligned with our investment philosophy,” said Chandresh Nigam, MD & CEO Axis AMC.

The total term of the fund will be five years from its final closing and may be extended for two additional periods of one year each.

The AIF is looking to capitalize on innovation and growth in the economy and to invest in companies that are benefiting from these trends. The fund will be primarily focused on investing in sectors including financial services especially fintech, technology, e-commerce, and edtech.

While making the investments, the fund will ensure that the investee company has a clear plan to go public with an initial public offer (IPO) over 3-5 years’ horizon and preferably the founders are open to a strategic sale for an optimum value.

The fund will be keen on investing in companies that are likely to emerge as beneficiaries of the fast-evolving digital economy as either as a disruptor, enabler or adaptor. It will also ensure the presence of established investors who are shareholders in the company through previous rounds of funding.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis AMC raises Rs 400 crore via Growth Avenues AIF-I, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Asset Management Company, an arm of private sector lender Axis Bank, has raised around Rs 400 crore through first close of Axis Growth Avenues AIF-I, aiming to fund ideas with deep technology as their USP. The asset management company is aiming to raise a total of Rs 1,000 crore through the close-ended fund, including a greenshoe option of Rs 500 crore. It is confident of completing the entire fundraising in this quarter, based on response and commitments from investors.

The fund has achieved the first close with investments from family offices, high networth individuals (HNIs) and non-resident Indians (NRIs). The fund will be investing primarily in mid-to-late stage technology-enabled companies with scaleable business models and a favourable risk-return profile. The sector-agnostic fund will be investing in companies catering to latent demands with multiyear growth potential and differentiated business model.

Axis Growth Avenues AIF-I will be exploring both primary and secondary investment opportunities with the proposed portfolio size of eight to 10 companies, with deal size ranging from Rs 25 crore to Rs 100 crore each.

The AMC has a strong pipeline of investments and expects to start deploying funds from the AIF soon. “The strong response that we are receiving for the Axis Growth Avenues AIF-I, reflects the confidence investors and partners have in us, as well as the potential of this segment. It will be our endeavour to ensure we deploy this money in companies that offer exciting long term growth opportunities and are aligned with our investment philosophy,” said Chandresh Nigam, chief executive, Axis AMC.

Total fund term will be five years from its final closing and may be extended for two additional periods of one year each. The AIF is looking to capitalise on innovation and growth in the economy and to invest in companies that are benefiting from these trends. It will be primarily focused on investing in fintech, technology, ecommerce and edtech.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Stuck in India due to Covid ? Know your tax liability

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Doubts regarding the residency status of those who are stuck in India during FY21 were expected to be clarified in the Budget. But the Budget was silent on the issue. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has now come out with a circular on this. The long-awaited circular has not changed conditions for determining the residential status, but it has reiterated that the possibility of double taxation is low. If you have been stranded in India and working out of home, here’s what you need to know:

What are the existing rules applicable to determine the residential status as per the Income Tax Act?

As per the current income tax provisions, an Indian citizen or a person of Indian origin (PIO) whose Indian income does not exceed ₹15 lakh per annum becomes a resident of India if she/he stays at least 182 days in the country in a financial year. If the Indian income of such a person exceeds ₹15 lakh, she/he attains residency in India if a) stays in India for 182 days or more in a financial year, or b) stays for 120 days or more in the relevant financial year and also stays for 365 days or more in preceding four previous years.

If the person is a not a citizen of India or a PIO, then the 120 days in the second scenario above will be replaced with 60 days.

Note that these rules are applicable from FY21. The residential status rules applicable for FY20 were tweaked to provide some relief to taxpayers by excluding the period of stay in India from March 22, 2020 to March 31, 2020 for the purposes of determining the residential status if the taxpayer was not able to leave India during that period.

What are the instances wherein one may become the resident of India for the reason of being stranded in the country due to Covid-19?

There could be two main instances wherein an individual may become a resident in India in FY21 (on the back of exceptional situations) due to which income earned may become taxable both in India and abroad.

One, a person of Indian origin working abroad who acquired residence status there but temporarily returned to India because of Covid-19 situation. He may become a resident in India while retaining the residency status of the other country in which she/he is working.

Two, a non-resident visitor to India (perhaps on a holiday or to work for a few weeks) gets stranded here due to the pandemic and attains the resident status here. It is also relevant to note that even in cases wherein an individual became resident in India, he would most likely become not ordinarily resident in India and hence his foreign sourced income shall not be taxable in India unless it is derived from a business controlled in or a profession set up in India.

Does the CBDT circular provide relief on the residency conditions for FY21 to those stranded in the country?

There is no relief provided in terms of period of stay for FY21 for the purpose of residential status. The circular just states that NRIs and foreign nationals stuck in India due to Covid-19 pandemic and facing double taxation in FY21 can submit the details to the income-tax department by March 31.

The circular tries to allay the fear of double taxation — taxability both in abroad and in India – of an income. It says the possibility of double taxation doesn’t exist as per the provisions of Income Tax Act, read with the DTAA (Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement) with each country.

In spite of that, if a particular tax payer suffers from double taxation due to forced stay in India despite complying with the rules in DTAA, he/she shall provide such information online to the Income Tax Department in Form NR annexed with CBDT circular by March 31, 2021 (https://tinyurl.com/taxres21). After examining the case, the tax department decides if any relaxation is required to be given in that case.

Does it mean that you have to worry about taxes if you have worked from India in FY21 for a company incorporated outside the country ?

There is no a straight forward answer. It is possible that a person is stranded in India due to Covid-19 but continued to earn income from the employer abroad by working from home. According to Mukesh Kumar, Director at M2K Advisors, salary earned by an employee for services rendered in India is taxable in India, irrespective of whether the employee is a resident or non-resident.

However, in case of foreign citizens, remuneration received from a foreign entity is exempt if the foreign entity is not engaged in any business in India, the stay of the employee does not exceed certain number of days (say, 183 days as per the India-USA DTAA) in the financial year and such remuneration is not claimed as deduction in India. However, to claim the tax treaty benefit, the employee should obtain tax residency certificate from the other country. However, experts say that obtaining a tax certificate from other country, sometimes, could be a time-consuming and a costly affair.

So, if your income becomes taxable in India, will you get the tax credit if the taxes are already paid on that income abroad?

A resident person in India is entitled to claim credit of the taxes paid in any other country in accordance with the rule 128 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. This can be done by submitting the withholding tax certificate from the other country or any other supporting document evidencing payment of tax in the other country along with the return of income in India in Form 67. Having said that, if the tax rates in the country in which taxes are already paid are lower than the applicable tax rates in India, the assessee will be liable to pay the balance amount.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Why is it so annoying to send money abroad?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


If you’ve ever spent significant time abroad, or tried supporting family overseas, you know that the process of sending money internationally can be stressful. It costs time and money — often too much of both. There’s hope that global crypto currencies will make this process easier, but until those become more accepted, you’ll have to find other ways to save.

I remember returning to New Delhi after a semester at Yale University in Connecticut some years back and trying to move what I had in U.S. dollars to my bank account in India. The process of remitting these savings was so clunky – involving applications in banks in both countries — that I just used my U.S. debit card until the account ran dry. I’m sure I paid a bunch of fees and got short-changed on currency conversion costs, but I found it easier to spend this money rather than spending time trying to find a cheaper way.

Although the costs of remitting have fallen in recent years, they’re still above the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal of 3% per transaction by 2030. A world bank study shows that the overall average costs of transmission were 6.5% in 2020, with sending money digitally costing slightly less and sending via bank transfer slightly more.

That means for every $100 you want to remit abroad, you really only send around $93 on average. This varies depending on how you move your money and by where you’re sending money to and from. For example, remitting from a Group of Twenty (G20) country will on average cost just more than 3% if it’s going to India, but more than 6% if it’s going to South Africa. When money is sent within Sub-Saharan Africa, fees can into as much as 20% of the amount.

That’s a heavy cost for what should be a simple transaction. According to the World Bank, global citizens sent and received more than $650 billion in personal remittances in 2019. That means we lost around $45 billion to costs alone.

Fortunately, there are a few things you can do to lower your own costs when trundling money around the world. But keep in mind that exact costs will depend on where you are and where you’re remitting to.

First, it helps to know that there are two main components of the cost in sending money abroad: the fees of the bank or transmitting entity you use, and the foreign exchange margin they make when they buy at the lower end of the currency exchange rate and sell at the higher end. You should check both before you move any money. You’re getting a good deal if your total cost — fees plus the currency exchange margin — is lower than 5% of the transaction amount. If you’re being offered 8% of the amount, that’s generally too much.

You should also consider where you go. There are four entities that will do the job: banks, credit and debit cards, traditional money transfer firms and fintechs. No surprises here that the banks and cash transfers cost the most and fintech firms the least.

If the country you’re remitting to allows for exchanging mobile money through e-wallets, then that’s likely to be the cheapest way to send and receive money. Find a licensed, regulated entity that works between the geographies you want to move money between, and check if the total cost is less than 5%. But keep in mind that certain places don’t have wallets that work with each other, and that there may be country specific rules around the movement of money.

Cost isn’t the only consideration either. Perhaps it’s worth paying the higher bank transfer fees because you get the greatest sense of security from going through that institution. It usually helps to find others you who have made similar payments and see what worked best for them.

Of course, what you decide to use will ultimately depend on your goals. Are you trying to set up a child who’s just moved abroad? If so, going through a bank is still your best bet. And you’ll want to make sure they have at least two months of rent, food and other expenses in cash since setting up cross-border bank accounts takes time.

Are you sending money back to your family on a regular basis? Then you’ll want a cheaper fintech solution if possible, otherwise a bank will remain your friend. If you’re just traveling for a short period (once we’re traveling again), you can simply use your debit or credit cards to get access to your own money — check with your card company, though, about any foreign transaction fees — or you can use mobile money in the form of e-wallets.

No, these solutions aren’t perfect, and yes, the remittance system remains a headache. We can only hope that as crypto currencies gain acceptance, moving money across countries will become as fast, easy and cheap as moving money within them.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Why is it so annoying to send money abroad?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


If you’ve ever spent significant time abroad, or tried supporting family overseas, you know that the process of sending money internationally can be stressful. It costs time and money — often too much of both. There’s hope that global crypto currencies will make this process easier, but until those become more accepted, you’ll have to find other ways to save.

I remember returning to New Delhi after a semester at Yale University in Connecticut some years back and trying to move what I had in U.S. dollars to my bank account in India. The process of remitting these savings was so clunky – involving applications in banks in both countries — that I just used my U.S. debit card until the account ran dry. I’m sure I paid a bunch of fees and got short-changed on currency conversion costs, but I found it easier to spend this money rather than spending time trying to find a cheaper way.

Although the costs of remitting have fallen in recent years, they’re still above the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal of 3% per transaction by 2030. A world bank study shows that the overall average costs of transmission were 6.5% in 2020, with sending money digitally costing slightly less and sending via bank transfer slightly more.

That means for every $100 you want to remit abroad, you really only send around $93 on average. This varies depending on how you move your money and by where you’re sending money to and from. For example, remitting from a Group of Twenty (G20) country will on average cost just more than 3% if it’s going to India, but more than 6% if it’s going to South Africa. When money is sent within Sub-Saharan Africa, fees can into as much as 20% of the amount.

That’s a heavy cost for what should be a simple transaction. According to the World Bank, global citizens sent and received more than $650 billion in personal remittances in 2019. That means we lost around $45 billion to costs alone.

Fortunately, there are a few things you can do to lower your own costs when trundling money around the world. But keep in mind that exact costs will depend on where you are and where you’re remitting to.

First, it helps to know that there are two main components of the cost in sending money abroad: the fees of the bank or transmitting entity you use, and the foreign exchange margin they make when they buy at the lower end of the currency exchange rate and sell at the higher end. You should check both before you move any money. You’re getting a good deal if your total cost — fees plus the currency exchange margin — is lower than 5% of the transaction amount. If you’re being offered 8% of the amount, that’s generally too much.

You should also consider where you go. There are four entities that will do the job: banks, credit and debit cards, traditional money transfer firms and fintechs. No surprises here that the banks and cash transfers cost the most and fintech firms the least.

If the country you’re remitting to allows for exchanging mobile money through e-wallets, then that’s likely to be the cheapest way to send and receive money. Find a licensed, regulated entity that works between the geographies you want to move money between, and check if the total cost is less than 5%. But keep in mind that certain places don’t have wallets that work with each other, and that there may be country specific rules around the movement of money.

Cost isn’t the only consideration either. Perhaps it’s worth paying the higher bank transfer fees because you get the greatest sense of security from going through that institution. It usually helps to find others you who have made similar payments and see what worked best for them.

Of course, what you decide to use will ultimately depend on your goals. Are you trying to set up a child who’s just moved abroad? If so, going through a bank is still your best bet. And you’ll want to make sure they have at least two months of rent, food and other expenses in cash since setting up cross-border bank accounts takes time.

Are you sending money back to your family on a regular basis? Then you’ll want a cheaper fintech solution if possible, otherwise a bank will remain your friend. If you’re just traveling for a short period (once we’re traveling again), you can simply use your debit or credit cards to get access to your own money — check with your card company, though, about any foreign transaction fees — or you can use mobile money in the form of e-wallets.

No, these solutions aren’t perfect, and yes, the remittance system remains a headache. We can only hope that as crypto currencies gain acceptance, moving money across countries will become as fast, easy and cheap as moving money within them.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY