RBI allows banks to sell fraud NPAs to ARCs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a move that will help banks unload a major chunk of their non-performing assets (NPAs) to the bad bank, RBI has allowed the sale of loan accounts classified as fraud to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs). Earlier, banks were barred from selling NPAs classified as fraud, which had left them saddled with a resolution of several large accounts.

Banks are targeting to sell Rs 2 lakh crore worth of NPAs to the bad bank or the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) for recovery. However, they have hit a roadblock in respect of accounts that have been classified as fraud, as they were not allowed to sell them. RBI has now allowed banks to sell fraud accounts, provided the transferee is not connected to the borrower.

RBI has also said that responsibilities of the transferor with respect to continuous reporting, monitoring, filing of complaints with law enforcement agencies and proceedings related to such complaints shall also be transferred to the ARC. “The transfer of such loan exposures to an ARC, however, does not absolve the transferor from fixing the staff accountability as required under the extant instructions on frauds,” RBI said.

“Due to forensic audit in all big NPAs, in last three years, advances amounting Rs 3.83 lakh crore were declared as fraud accounts. This chunk of NPAs will be available for sale to ARCs,” Hari Hara Mishra, director, UV ARC, said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank reports fraudulent NPA accounts worth ₹305 cr to RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian Bank, Public sector lender has informed the exchanges that it has declared two non performing asset (NPA) accounts worth over ₹300 crore as fraud and reported them to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The nature of fraud in both the cases has been defined as “Diversion of funds” by the lender.

“In terms of Sebi regulations and having regard to the Bank’s policy on determination and disclosures of material events/ information, we have to inform you that two NPAs accounts have been declared as fraud and reported to RBI as per regulatory requirement,” Indian Bank said in a filing.

The NPA accounts, related to Kiratpur Ner Chowk Expressway Ltd and Tantia Constructions Ltd, are worth ₹172.73 crore and ₹132.41 crore respectively.

On Thursday, Indian Bank’s scrip closed flat at ₹131.95 on NSE.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How did public sector banks become profitable in FY21?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman last week, while making the announcement of the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, claimed that the performance of public sector banks has improved, with just two public sector banks reporting losses.

“In 2018, just two out of 21 public sector banks were profitable. But in 2021, only two banks reported losses for the full year,” she had said.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore

From 2015, when the Reserve Bank of India conducted an Asset Quality Review (AQR), public sector banks started to make a lot of provisions in their loans. Non performing assets in the banking sector jumped 80% in FY16, according to RBI data, quoted in the July 2015 AQR.

The AQR created havoc on banks’ profitability, especially affecting state-owned banks because majority of their loans were provided to corporates.

Banks had been directed to keep increasing provisioning of accounts that were restructured from 5% to 15%, and accounts that were classified as sub-standard (first category of NPA), would slip into doubtful category if it stayed sub-standard for 12 months, attracting 40% provisioning. And if the loan is not serviced at all, the bank would have to treat it as a loss account with 100% provisioning.

Major PSBs reported record losses for the first time in the fourth quarter of FY16, like Bank of Baroda with Rs 3,230 crore and Punjab National Bank with Rs 5,367 crore.

Banks entered an NPA cycle, till 2021. The government came out with two major relief measures – recapitalisation, starting 2017, and merger of smaller public sector banks with large anchor banks.

Also read: Several NPAs transferred to bad bank may head to liquidation, cost govt a bomb

“Mergers of the banks is the step in the right direction as fewer banks with larger balance sheets would be able to compete better in the market,” said Yuvraj Choudhary, research analyst at Anand Rathi Financial Services.

In FY18, there were a total of 21 public sector banks, and as Sitharaman said, only two public sector banks reported profits – Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank.

“PSBs were reeling under corporate asset quality burden for long, more so after RBI’s AQR exercise. This was aggravated by forced mergers, which led to losses due to accelerated recognition and provisioning. Growth too decelerated as banks were busy with merger and had capital constraints,” an analyst with Emkay Global Financial Services said.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY18 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India (-) 6,547 crore
Punjab National Bank (-) 12,283 crore
Bank of Baroda (-) 2,432 crore
Bank of India (-) 6.044 crore
Central Bank of India (-) 5,105 crore
Canara Bank (-) 4,222 crore
Union Bank of India (-) 5,247 crore
Indian Overseas Bank (-) 6,300 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-) 744 crore
Indian Bank 1,259 crore
UCO Bank (-) 4,436 crore
Bank of Maharashtra (-) 1,146 crore
Oriental Bank of Commerce (-) 5,872 crore
United Bank of India (-) 1,455 crore
Andhra Bank (-) 3,413 crore
Allahabad Bank (-) 4,674 crore
Corporation Bank (-) 4,054 crore
Syndicate Bank (-) 3,223 crore
IDBI Bank (-) 8,238 crore
Dena Bank (-) 1,923 crore
Vijaya Bank 727 crore

Starting FY21, only 12 state-owned banks have remained. Six weaker PSBs had been merged with four anchor banks – Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were merged with Union Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India with Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank, and Allahabad Bank with Indian Bank.

In 2019, Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank were merged with Bank of Baroda, and IDBI Bank was recategorised as a private bank, with Life Insurance Corporation of India buying 51% stake. So far, IDBI Bank is the only PSB that has been privatised.

Mergers of public sector banks aided in reducing operation costs for the banks, but banks are not in the position to absorb any weak banks, according to analysts. “This is true even for SBI. Privatization of weak banks is the best way to weed them out,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Though mergers had caused a bit of a correction in the PSBs’ profitability earlier, mergers did not have any role to play in their profitability in FY21, analysts said.

“PSBs have turned profitable since past few quarters mainly due to healthy treasury gains and some lumpy corporate resolutions, (for eg. Bhushan Power). Impact of COVID-19 on corporate portfolio was relatively moderate, leading to further moderation in NPAs and lower incremental provisioning, which supported profitability,” the analyst at Emkay Global said.

Of the 12 banks, only two reported losses in FY21 – Punjab & Sind Bank and Central Bank of India.

PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS FY21 STANDALONE NET PROFIT/LOSS (in Rs)
State Bank of India 20,410 crore
Punjab National Bank 2,022 crore
Bank of Baroda 829 crore
Bank of India 2,160 crore
Central Bank of India (-)888 crore
Canara Bank 2,558 crore
Union Bank of India 2,905 crore
Indian Overseas Bank 831 crore
Punjab & Sind Bank (-)2,732 crore
Indian Bank 3,004 crore
UCO Bank 167 crore
Bank of Maharashtra 550 crore

Sitharaman, at the press conference last week, also said that banks have recovered Rs 3.1 lakh crore since March 2018.

This was possible because sizeable recovery from lumpy corporate NPAs, by way of cash and write-offs, was expected. Some resolutions including Essar, Bhushan, were major contributors to these recovery numbers, analysts said.

Click here to read all our stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How banks in Europe are managing bad loans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Credit crunch was beginning to become a major problem for banks in Europe, however, they seem to have found a way to tackle the issue.

Non-performing assets in European banks were piling up due to COVID-19. As of the second quarter of 2020, the NPA ratio for all banks in the region was at 2.8%, up 0.2 percentage points from a year ago.

According to reports, banks set aside lower provisions for potential loan losses in the second quarter of 2021, with UK banks booking significant reversals. Booking reversals here means that overall funds that accounted for bad loans shrank, making risk from bad loans manageable, according to analysts.

According to data by S&P Global Market Intelligence, 12 of the 25 largest banks in Europe booked reversals, and loan loss provisions have been put aside to cover potential costs arising from defaulting loans.

Of the 12 — Barclays PLC, NatWest Group PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC, HSBC Holdings PLC and Standard Chartered PLC — are based in the UK, with Barclays releasing the highest amount of 911 million euros, according to their data.

So far, banks have not seen a surge in bad loans. However, with talks of central banks moving towards tapering COVID-19 support, the market expects deterioration in asset quality.

This is likely to be more visible in 2022 and will happen gradually rather than suddenly since the measures will not end all at once, DBRS’ Rivas told S&P Global.

If banks do need top-up provisions due to additional bad loans in pandemic-affected sectors, the risks would likely be against earnings rather than capital, said S&P Global Ratings’ Edwards.

Click here to read more stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

BoI, Union Bank, PNB may gain most from bad bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) will have maximum impact on loan books of Bank of India (BoI), Union Bank and Punjab National Bank (PNB), which will sell over 1% of their loans to the bad bank. According to rating agency Crisil, the bad bank, or NARCL, will lower the NPA level of banks by 20-25% over time.

However, the immediate impact on the bottom line will be limited as lenders who sell loans in the first phase will receive just around Rs 2,700 crore upfront cash payment as against the Rs 90,000 crore of bad loans they sell to the corporation. Also, investing in the security receipts issued by NARCL will not increase the capital requirement of banks due to the government guarantee.

Of the Rs 2 lakh crore of bad loans to be transferred to NARCL, around Rs 30,600 crore will be guaranteed for five years. NARCL will pay 15% of whatever amount the loans are valued at, in cash. The remaining 85% will be paid using security receipts. According to a Jefferies report, the government guarantee will keep the security capital neutral as without the guarantee banks will have to set aside funds towards provisions. A sovereign guarantee being risk-free does not attract similar capital requirements.

“For the guaranteed part, banks will recognise the value as an investment but that will not require any capital for 5 years as there is government guarantee. For non-guaranteed part, banks might not recognise value until actual recovery is made,” the Jefferies report said.

According to the report, of the first lot, SBI will be transferring the biggest chunk of loans at Rs 20,000 crore. However, given the size, the sale will be only 0.8% of its loan book. While BoI, Union Bank and PNB will be selling much less at Rs 5,500 crore, Rs 7,800 crore and Rs 8,000 crore, their loans will be a much bigger chunk of their balance sheet. For BoI, the loans sold will be 1.5% of its book, 1.3% for Union Bank and 1.2% for PNB, Jefferies said.

“The sovereign guarantee will cushion security receipt investors against potential lower recoveries. This could, in turn, potentially enable the development of a secondary market in security receipts, which has proved elusive so far,” said Crisil senior director and deputy chief ratings officer Krishnan Sitaraman.

The loans sold to the bad bank include Rs 22,500-crore exposure to Videocon Oil Ventures, where SBI is the lead bank. Another large account is Union Bank-led account of Amtek Auto, which has Rs 9,014 crore of bank loans. IDBI is the lead banker in three large accounts — Reliance Naval, Jaypee Infra and GTL.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Digitization will be over in 3 months, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Thiruvananthapuram: The digitization work at Kerala Bank will be completed in three months. Once that is over, Kerala Bank would be able to offer all services offered by new-generation banks to their customers.

Kerala Bank has already disbursed agri loans worth Rs 2,648 crore from April to August. The bank also recorded an increase of Rs 5,658 crore in cash deposits during that period. The bank’s performance was reviewed at a meeting chaired by cooperation minister VN Vasavan on Wednesday.

There was a Rs 387.95 crore decrease in its non-performing assets. The bank’s NPA stood at 14.7% of the total loans disbursed, said an official statement from the office of the minister.

The bank, during the last quarter, carried out business worth Rs 1,06,397 crore. The revenue of the bank increased to Rs 61.96 crore during the period. Till March 31, 2021, Kerala Bank gave loans to the tune of Rs 5,295 crore. This showed an annual increase of Rs 507 crore. The agri loans that had earlier been offered at an interest rate of 7% is now given at 6%.

Even during the pandemic, Kerala Bank sanctioned Rs 2,000 crore to primary cooperative societies as a liquidity fund. The review meeting also decided to give loans, up to Rs 60 lakh, in the food processing industry at a lower interest rate. Subsidy up to 35% or Rs 10 lakh would be given for such loans.

The bank is already giving low-interest loans to gulf-returnees, farmers, medium/small scale industrial units. The bank also decided to launch new attractive deposit schemes that would be useful to a cross section of the society. Kerala Bank is fast completing the facilities and arrangements insisted by RBI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CBI books firm, CMD for Rs 1.5K cr bank fraud, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Shimla: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case against a Delhi-based private company, which has its industrial unit in Himachal Pradesh, and others including its promoter & CMD; director/guarantor & two corporate guarantors; unknown public servant(s)/unknown others, for allegedly conspiring with each other to defraud banks, while causing a loss of around Rs 1,528.05 crore to the consortium of 16 banks led by Bank of India.

The consortium banks were – Bank of India, Union Bank of India, Andhra Bank, Punjab & Sind Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, State Bank of Hyderabad, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank, HDFC Bank Limited, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Saraswat Co-operative Bank, State Bank of Patiala, UCO Bank, Allahabad Bank, Standard Chartered Bank & DBS.

The case has been registered against Indian Technomach Company Limited, its promoter & CMD Rakesh Kumar Sharma, director/guarantor Vinay Kumar Sharma, Gurupath Merchandise Limited (corporate guarantor), Kolkata, and Thunder Traders Limited (Corporate Guarantor), Kolkata, and unknown public servants/others.

CBI officials said searches were conducted on Wednesday at various premises, including at Kangra and Paonta Sahib in Sirmaur district, Himachal Pradesh.

It was alleged that the private company, engaged in manufacturing of ferrous and non-ferrous metal, obtained credit facilities/loans from the consortium of 16 nationalised/private banks from 2008 to 2013 with Bank of India as lead bank.

The accused had allegedly conspired with an intention to defraud the banks through said acts and diverted funds from the loan account, thus causing a loss of Rs 1528.05 crore to the said consortium of the banks.

The account was classified as NPA in the books of accounts of Bank of India with effect from March 31, 2014 due to overdue status of the account in line with IRAC guidelines. The account was red-flagged by Bank of India, as advised by RBI in May 2015 and was declared a fraud in February 2016.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

MSMEs, retail loans to take bank NPAs to Rs 10 lakh crore by March 2022, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks’ bad loans might cross Rs 10 lakh crore by the end of this fiscal, mainly on account of slippages in retail and MSME sectors, a study said.

“NPAs are expected to rise to 8.5-9 per cent by March 2022, driven by slippages in retail, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) accounts, besides some restructured assets,” the study by industry body Assocham and ratings firm Crisil said.

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das this month had said the current levels of non-performing assets (NPA) looks manageable.

At the end of June, the gross NPA level of the banking system was 7.5 per cent and the capital adequacy level was around 16 per cent, which gives an adequate cushion, Das said at an event.

MSME, retail hit

The current asset quality stress cycle will be different than that witnessed a few years back. NPAs then came primarily from bigger, chunkier accounts.

According to the study, this time, smaller accounts, especially the MSME and retail segments, are expected to be more vulnerable than large corporates, as the latter have consolidated and deleveraged their balance sheets considerably in the past few years.

Even though the restructuring scheme announced for MSMEs and small borrowers should prevent the NPAs from rising too much, there is an opportunity for stressed asset investors with expertise and interest in these asset classes, it added.

”The effectiveness of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) will be tested by the potential spike in NPAs as the standstill on initiation of fresh insolvency cases for year ended in March 2021 and as most of the pandemic-induced policies or measures are unlikely to be continued”the study said.

IBC to rescue

The expected increase in GNPAs of both banks and non-banks this fiscal, because of the pandemic, will provide an opportunity for players in the stressed assets market through resolution via various routes, with IBC likely to be the most preferred.

However, the GNPAs of banks have declined from the peak seen in March 2018 and were lower as of March 2021 as against March 2020. Supportive measures, including the six-month debt moratorium, Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) loans and restructuring measures were among the main reasons.

According to the study, the risk management practices of Indian banks, especially public sector banks, have scope for improvement.

In the past, laws were not in favour of lenders and allowed erring promoters to exploit the tedious recovery procedure. This is borne out by the high number of wilful defaulters of banks, it noted.

”However, RBI has tightened norms for such defaulters and made stressed asset resolution norms more stringent. That, coupled with increased resolution of large-ticket NPAs under the IBC framework, have contributed to better recovery of NPAs,” the study said.

Click here for more IBC news updates



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Large urban cooperative banks want to become ‘universal’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Large cooperative banks are considering turning into universal banks as the regulator has tightened norms, especially steep priority sector lending targets.

The RBI had increased the overall priority sector lending (PSL) target for UCBs to 75% of adjusted net bank credit (ANBC) or credit equivalent amount of off-balance sheet exposure, whichever is higher from 40% earlier.

PSL portfolio comprises loans to agriculture, micro, small and medium enterprises, export credit, education, housing, social infrastructure, among others, which UCBs have to increase to 75% of their advances by March 2024.

The RBI said tier-1 capital as on March 31 of the preceding financial year shall be reckoned for the purpose of fixing the exposure limits.

“Tier-1 capital for the purpose will be the same as that prescribed for computation of capital adequacy of UCBs,” it said.

Under the new proposed rules by RBI in 2019, UCBs with deposits of Rs 100 crore are to set up a board for management with the board of directors carrying out due diligence for their appointment, bringing them at par with commercial banks.

Board of management norms

On December 31, 2019, the Reserve Bank of India had released the final guidelines for setting up a board of management (BoM) for such banks. According to the guidelines, UCBs with deposits of Rs 100 crore and will constitute the Board of management which will be a mandatory requirement for opening new branches.

“The board of directors (BoD) of a UCB perform both the executive and supervisory roles, and has the responsibility to oversee the functioning of UCB as a cooperative society, as well as its functions as a bank. Since UCBs are accepting public deposits, it is imperative that a separate mechanism be put in place to protect the interests of depositors,” said the RBI in its notification.

The BoM will comprise expert banking professionals. It will also exercise oversight on banking-related functions of the UCBs, assist the BoD on formulation of policies and any other related matter, specifically delegated to it by the board for proper functioning of the bank, it added.

Borrowing oversight

The BoM will also oversee the management of fund and borrowings, and recommend action for recovery of non-performing assets (NPAs). The Board of directors will continue to be the apex policy setting body and constitute various committees of the board, including the BoM, to assist the board in carrying out its responsibilities.

The BoM will be constituted by the BoD within a period of one year from the date of the circular, and have a minimum of five members and may have as many as 12 members. The chairman of the BoM may be elected by the members from among themselves, or appointed by the BoD, while the CEO will be a non-voting member.

Banks looking at going universal

Saraswat Co-operative Bank and Cosmos Co-operative Bank were planning to seek the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) approval to convert into full-fledged commercial banks, according to reports last year.

As at March-end 2020, there were 88 UCBs with deposits greater than or equal to Rs 1,000 crore and 50 UCBs with advances greater than or equal to Rs 1,000 crore, per RBI data.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Restored normalcy in PSU banks hamstrung by sticky bad assets: Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


She said there are lot of changes happening in the banking sector at a fast pace through digitisation. (File)

Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday said the government was able to bring back normalcy with regards to mounting non-performing assets (NPAs) in most of the public sector banks that have been a cause of concern since 2014.

The Centre, apart from infusing required capital, monitored  the PSU banks with regular assessment and reviews while taking prompt corrective actions.

Inaugurating the centenary celebrations of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank (TMB) at Tuticorin, Sitharaman said the problems in banking sector are major problems that concern the entire country which also made everyone feel concerned about the sector.

“Post 2014, we had witnessed major NPA problems in the PSU banks, it took five to six years to reverse the trend and bring back normalcy in most of the banks. While the banks spent energy in the recovery process, even as trying to grow their businesses,” she said.

While speaking on bringing about the efficiency in the banking system, she said the way forward for any bank was to adopt complete technology-enabled solutions.

“Today financial technology is the biggest area and using that we could cross-populate data into forms. Auto-populating data of a consumer has been very useful and it can be done only through digitisation and the management of TMB should think of greater use of digitisation. Digitisation cannot be avoided for your own good and for the sake of customers,” she said.

She said there are lot of changes happening in the banking sector at a fast pace through digitisation. “There is no necessity to open a branch in a place which does not have a  bank. To reach a customer’s bank account of the people who live there, all kind of technologies are available today. Even sitting from Tuticorin one can serve the banking requirements of people living in small villages through technology”, she said.

Sitharaman said even during Covid-19 pandemic with the use of digitisation through banking correspondents, the government’s financial disbursements were distributed to the needy after verifying their details.

“Prime Minister Narendra Modi was clearly aware that banking is important and did not hesitate that there can be zero balance accounts if they were opened under the Jandhan Yojana scheme, launched in 2014. He ensured that every one must hold a bank account and be able to transact,” she said.

K V Rama Moorthy, MD & CEO, TMB, said, “To help borrowers to overcome the adverse impact of Covid-19, till date, the bank has covered 13,753 beneficiaries and the exposure to the tune of Rs 1,567.62 crore. In the era of digital banking, we were the first bank to introduce robotics in currency chest to sort and bundling of currencies in order to provide quality service to the customers. Disbursement of loans to pharma and health care units will be at the heart of a year- long series of events and initiatives from us.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 4 5 6 7 8 18