How does RBI’s staff accountability framework on NPAs work?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Ahead of a big credit push, the government has moved to remove the bankers’ fears of vigilance in extending small loans with a staff accountability framework.

Bankers fear investigation, hurt to career prospects and retirement if a loan sanctioned by them turns sour. This has made them averse to giving loans, which has led to obstacles in the flow of credit to deserving individuals and firms. The banking system is flush with liquidity but one of the reasons for credit not percolating is the risk-averseness which the new staff accountability norms seek to remove.

Loans up to Rs 10 lakh

Staff accountability need not be examined in NPA accounts with outstanding up to Rs 10 lakh. Most loans up to Rs 10 lakh are “template-based” and do not constitute a major percentage of the NPA portfolio by amount. Such accounts can turn into NPA even due to a slight change in circumstances including a family health crisis or a shutdown, leading to disruption in cash flows.

The credit risk assessment in these kinds of loans is driven by digital algorithms/templates and pre-designed schemes with low human intervention. The borrower community under this tier neither has financial literacy nor credit history.

Loans between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 1 crore

For examining staff accountability, banks may decide on a threshold of Rs 10 lakh or Rs 20 lakh, depending on their business size. These loans are processed at centralised back offices and not specifically at branches. They use lending automation templates, built-in digital algorithms and information drawn from aggregators with low use of discretion.

They have support of empanelled advocates and valuers. The staff accountability is to be examined by a committee formed at regional/controlling offices. For preliminary examination, the controller will submit to the committee a brief report, covering details of the loan and observations in inspection/audit reports for the previous four years.

If the committee finds a case of staff accountability exists, this will be examined by a fact-finding officer. But inspection and audit department staff will not be involved in conducting staff accountability. While conducting staff accountability examination, they should follow RBI guidance/norms. Standard operating procedure is to be followed in carrying out the task. This process will reduce the number of NPAs needing staff accountability examination to a large extent.

Loans between Rs 1 crore and Rs 50 crore

Accounts in this range are mostly credit facilities sanctioned to business units warranting examination by a specialised unit within the banks. NPA accounts in this range should undergo a preliminary examination by a committee constituted at one level higher than the sanction level — an account sanctioned at the regional office will be taken up at the zonal level, those at the zonal level by the circle office or head office, and so on.

The committee should be headed by an official senior to the sanctioning authority. For preliminary examination by the committee, a detailed report should be submitted through the controller. If the committee finds material lapses in any of the processes, the account may be referred at the discretion of the committee to the controlling audit office for a detailed examination of staff accountability.

A detailed report on the account will be submitted to the committee covering the borrower profile with reasons leading to the account turning into NPA. The comments of the internal and external auditors of the last four years and compliance thereof will also be submitted to the committee. Preliminary examination by the committee will be based on all monitoring, follow up, compliance of observations of the auditors.

If the committee finds material lapses in the stages of sanction, disbursement, monitoring and follow up, the committee may at its discretion refer the NPA account to the controlling audit office/audit vertical for detailed staff accountability examination. The audit vertical will rely upon the observations/remarks of the external/internal auditors of the last four years and after the conclusion of analysis shall submit a report to the committee for taking a final view.

For loans above Rs 50 crore

In the large accounts, after examining staff accountability, the vigilance and non-vigilance angle is to be identified by the Internal Advisory Committee (IAC).

Recommendations of IAC, where staff accountability is established, will be referred to the chief vigilance officer (CVO) for vetting. For banks with business of up to Rs 10 lakh crore, the cases of Rs 10 crore and above are to be sent to CVO. Banks with business of between Rs 10 lakh crore and Rs 25 lakh crore can refer cases of Rs 30 crore and above. Banks with business of over Rs 25 lakh crore may refer cases of Rs 50 crore and above.

Banks will have to complete an accountability exercise within six months from the date an account is classified as NPA. Depending on the banks’ business size, the guidelines suggest threshold limits for scrutiny of the accountability by the chief vigilance officer. If NPA is caused by external factors — such as change in government policy, natural calamities, non-release of government subsidy/grant — it should not attract a staff accountability examination, according to the framework.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI asks banks not to standardise bad loans on just getting interest payments, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a significant move, the Reserve Bank on Friday tightened the norms for recognition of dud assets and directed lenders not to standardise an NPA account after getting only interest payment as well as to mandatorily mention the due dates along with details of interest and principal amounts.

The monetary authority has from time to time been issuing new/revised norms on dud asset classification as system-wide NPAs began to balloon.

Issuing some clarifications to all the extant provisions and including the ones issued on October 1, 2021, on the prudential norms on income recognition, asset classification and provisioning pertaining to advances (IRACP), the RBI asked banks not to upgrade an NPA account after getting only interest dues paid.

It has been observed that some lending institutions upgrade accounts classified as NPAs to standard accounts on payment of only interest overdue, partial overdue, etc. To avoid any ambiguity in this regard, it is clarified that loan accounts classified as NPAs may be upgraded as a standard account only if the entire arrears of interest and principal are paid by the borrower, the apex bank said in the revised notification this evening.

Lenders have also been asked to specifically mention in the loan agreements the exact due date of a loan and the breakup of the principal and interest, among others, instead of giving a description of the due dates, which leaves scope for interpretation.

Henceforth, all lenders have to clearly mention the exact due dates for repayment, frequency of repayment, break up between the principal and interest, examples of SMA/NPA classification dates etc, it said.

All these should be clearly specified in the loan agreement and the borrower shall be apprised of the same at the time of loan sanction and also at the time of subsequent changes if any, and till full repayment of the loan is done, the RBI said, adding this will be applicable immediately for new loans or before December 31, 2021, and for the existing loan as and when changes occur.

In cases of a loan under moratorium, the exact date of commencement of repayment shall also be specified in the loan agreements, it added.

Sticking to its due by the end of the day/one-day default norms, which has given many large borrowers heartburns, RBI further clarified that an account shall be flagged as overdue as part of the lender’s day-end processes for the due date, irrespective of the time of running such processes, reiterating that all extant IRACP norms specify that an amount must be treated as overdue if it’s not paid on the due date fixed by the lender.

Similarly, classification of an account as SMA (special mention account) as well as NPA (non-performing assets) shall be done as part of the day-end process and the SMA/NPA classification date shall be the calendar date for which the day-end process is run. Stated differently, the date of SMA/NPA shall reflect the asset classification status of an account at the day-end of that calendar date, the regulator stressed.

The monetary authority further said these changes are being made to ensure that the IRACP norms are uniformly implemented across all lending institutions and are applicable mutatis mutandis (making necessary changes on a case to case basis but not affecting the main points) to all lending institutions.

On NPA classification, it said the lender must recognise incipient stress in a borrower account, immediately on default, by classifying it as SMA. Without any ambiguity, it clarified that the intervals are intended to be continuous and accordingly, loans other than revolving facilities like cash credit/overdraft will become SMA if the principal or interest payment or any other amount wholly or partly become overdue or if the outstanding balance remains continuously in excess of the sanctioned limit or drawing power, whichever is lower, for 0-30 days as SMA, for 30-60 days as SMA-1 and over 60-90 days as SMA2/NPAs.

Stated differently, the date of SMA/NPA shall reflect the asset classification status of an account at the day-end of that calendar date.

For instance, if the due date is March 31, and full dues are not received before the day-end process, the date of overdue shall be March 31.

If it continues to remain overdue, then this account shall get tagged as SMA-1 on running the day-end process on April 30, on completion of 30 days of being continuously overdue.

Accordingly, the date of SMA-1 classification for that account shall be April 30. Similarly, if the account continues to remain overdue, it shall get tagged as SMA2 on running day-end process on May 30 and if continued to remain overdue further, it shall get classified as NPA on running day-end process on June 29.

However, for NBFCs, 90-days for SMA-2/NPA classification may be read according to the applicable norms.

The central bank has clarified that the instructions on SMA classification are applicable to all loans, including retail loans (excluding the Agri loans governed by crop season-based asset classification norms), irrespective of the size of exposure of the lending institution.

The RBI said from March 31, 2022, in case of interest payments in respect of term loans, an account will be classified as NPA if the interest applied at specified rests remains overdue for over 90 days. If a borrower account becomes overdue on or after March 31, 2022, its classification as NPA shall be based on the account being overdue for over 90 days.

On the upgrading of accounts classified as NPAs, it said a loan account classified as NPAs can be upgraded as standard only if the entire arrears of interest and principal are repaid. But those accounts classified as NPA due to restructuring, or non-achievement of the date of commencement of commercial operations, etc, extant provisions shall continue.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Suryoday Small Finance Bank reports net loss of Rs 1.9 crore for quarter ended September, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Suryoday Small Finance Bank made a net loss of Rs 1.9 crore for the quarter ending September 30, as compared with Rs 27.2 crore net profit in the year ago period, owing higher credit cost following the pandemic-led stress on its borrowers.

This is the bank’s second consecutive quarterly loss after Rs 47.7 crore loss in the June quarter.

Its operating profit rose 62% at Rs 82.8 crore against Rs 51.1 crore over the same period. Its net interest income at 147 crore reflects a 34% rise, primarily on account of rise in gross advances over the period and lower cost of funds, the bank said in a regulatory filing to stock exchanges.

But a 6.6-fold higher provisions to cover bad loans and others led to the loss.

Its asset quality deteriorated with gross non-performing assets ratio rising to 10.2% at the end of September compared with 9.5% at the end of June. Net NPA remained flat 4.5%. Provision coverage ratio stood a tad higher at 71.2%.

The bank restructured loans to the tune of Rs 794 crore, which was 17.7% of gross loans, which grew 21% year-on-year to Rs 4470 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Suryoday Small Finance Bank reports net loss of Rs 1.9 crore for quarter ended September, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Suryoday Small Finance Bank made a net loss of Rs 1.9 crore for the quarter ending September 30, as compared with Rs 27.2 crore net profit in the year ago period, owing higher credit cost following the pandemic-led stress on its borrowers.

This is the bank’s second consecutive quarterly loss after Rs 47.7 crore loss in the June quarter.

Its operating profit rose 62% at Rs 82.8 crore against Rs 51.1 crore over the same period. Its net interest income at 147 crore reflects a 34% rise, primarily on account of rise in gross advances over the period and lower cost of funds, the bank said in a regulatory filing to stock exchanges.

But a 6.6-fold higher provisions to cover bad loans and others led to the loss.

Its asset quality deteriorated with gross non-performing assets ratio rising to 10.2% at the end of September compared with 9.5% at the end of June. Net NPA remained flat 4.5%. Provision coverage ratio stood a tad higher at 71.2%.

The bank restructured loans to the tune of Rs 794 crore, which was 17.7% of gross loans, which grew 21% year-on-year to Rs 4470 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

The story behind Former Chairman Pratip Chaudhary’s arrest, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Hospital PMO Dr JR Panwar said the condition of Chaudhuri, who is a patient of hypertension, is stable.

Pratip Chaudhary, former State Bank of India chairman, was arrested last Sunday for a loan scam involving a hotel project in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, dating back 14 years.

Chaudhary’s bail plea was rejected, and after spending a day in jail, he was admitted to Jawahar Hospital in Jaipur last Wednesday due to restlessness.

The loan scam

In 2007, the state-owned bank had sanctioned a loan of Rs 24 crore to Godawan Group for a constructing a hotel in Jaisalmer. The properties were worth Rs 200 crore. The Group was unable to repay the loan as the project could not be completed and Dilip Singh Rathore, group owner, passed away in April 2010.

The loan was declared a non-performing asset in June 2010.

Chaudhary has been alleged to have “connived” with Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company, and violated Reserve Bank of India norms to declare the loan an NPA, and sold company property for Rs 25 crore. Chaudhary retired as SBI chairman after a two-year term in September 2013.

Harendra Singh Rathore, son of Dilip Singh and current promoter of Godawan Group, pointed out that Chaudhury joined the board of Alchemist ARC in October 2014.

A complaint was registered with Rajasthan Police in 2015, which was closed after it was stated a “civil matter” between individuals.

However, following a protest petition filed by Harendra Rathore in 2016, which challenged the police action and investigation, Chaudhuri was arrested on last Sunday.

The order was issued on February 12, 2020, but execution was held up by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chaudhary did not follow proper procedure in the auction of the properties and did it in a hurry, the court order said, adding that the entire process appears to be a “conspiracy”, hatched along with officials of Alchemist, to acquire the properties.

The properties were given away at a much lower price than the reserve price and Chaudhary misused his position, because the project was declared an NPA much before time, the order added.

Latest developments

Alok Dhir of Alchemist ARC, who is the other accused in the case, got transit anticipatory bail on Friday from the Delhi High Court. He will not be arrested till Tuesday.

Chaudhury has been charged under sections 420 (cheating and dishonesty including delivery of property), 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant, or agent) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

The bank, defending Chaudhary, said in a statement that the sale followed the laid-down process in line with the policy of the bank. SBI said it took various steps for completion of the project as well as recovery of dues but it did not yield the desired results. Hence, the dues were assigned to an ARC in March 2014.

The borrower was put through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code process by the ARC, and the asset was acquired by a non-banking financial company in December 2017, the bank had said in the statement.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks make higher-than-required provisions for Srei Group exposure

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Large public sector banks (PSBs) have proactively made substantially higher provisions, ranging from 40-100 per cent, towards their exposure to the Kolkata-based Srei Group against the usual regulatory requirement of 15 per cent.

Forensic audit

This is due to the uncertainty over what a forensic audit of the account may reveal and the haircut lenders may have to take under the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated against the group.

The Reserve Bank of India’s norms require banks to make a general provision of 15 per cent on their total outstanding exposure to a substandard asset. Unsecured substandard assets attract an additional provision of 10 per cent.

Bankers say they don’t want any surprises on the provisioning front in the coming quarters vis-a-vis the Srei account, which comprises Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd (SIFL) and its wholly owned subsidiary Srei Equipment Finance Ltd (SEFL).

Moreover, recovery from the resolution of DHFL and healthy profit in the second quarter have given them the elbow room to increase the provisions.

The banks that have made higher upfront provisions towards their exposure to the Srei Group include State Bank of India (SBI, 100 per cent), Union Bank of India (UBI, 65 per cent), Bank of India and Central Bank of India (BoI, CBoI 50 per cent each), and Punjab National Bank (PNB, 40 per cent). PNB has an exposure of ₹2,600 crore to the Srei group, UBI ₹2,558 crore, BoI ₹1,024 crore in direct exposure and ₹970 crore via pooled route, and CBoI ₹1,149 crore. SBI’s exposure is believed to be over ₹2,000 crore.

₹26,476-crore borrowings

As at March-end 2021, the consolidated borrowings of the Srei Group stood at ₹26,476 crore. This includes term loans, working capital facilities, collateral borrowings and unsecured loans. Liabilities in the form of debt securities and subordinated liabilities stood at ₹2,441 crore and ₹2,785 crore respectively.

Governance concerns

RBI had, on October 4, 2021, superseded the Board of Directors of SIFL and SEFL. The central bank, in a statement, said it took this action owing to governance concerns and defaults by these companies in meeting their various payment obligations.

It appointed Rajneesh Sharma, Ex- Chief General Manager, Bank of Baroda, as the Administrator of the aforesaid companies.

The central bank’s applications for initiation of CIRP against SIFL and SEFL under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, read with Financial Service Providers Insolvency Rules were admitted by the Kolkata Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal on October 8.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dhanlaxmi Bank Q2 net declines 74pc at Rs 3.66cr on soaring bad assets, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Dhanlaxmi Bank on Friday reported a nearly 74 per cent plunge in its net profit to Rs 3.66 crore in quarter ended in September 2021 as provisions rose due to a spike in bad loans. The private sector bank had posted a net profit of Rs 14.01 crore in the corresponding period a year ago.

Total income of the bank during the July-September period of 2021-22, however, grew to Rs 266.59 crore from Rs 249.66 crore in the same period of 2020-21, Dhanlaxmi Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Interest income was down at Rs 229 crore in Q2FY22 from Rs 243.97 crore in Q1FY21, even as the other income was higher at Rs 37.58 crore, as against Rs 5.69 crore.

Provisions for the bad loans and contingencies for the reported quarter rose to Rs 22.40 crore from Rs 4.29 crore in September 2020.

The bank’s gross non-performing assets (NPAs) rose to 8.67 per cent of the gross advances as of September 30, 2021, from 6.36 per cent in the year-ago same period.

However, sequentially from gross NPAs were down compared to 9.27 per cent in June 2021 quarter. Value-wise, the gross NPAs were worth Rs 604.15 crore, up from Rs 448.72 crore.

Net NPAs too rose to 4.92 per cent (Rs 329.55 crore) from 1.66 per cent (Rs 111.45 crore).

“During the quarter ended September 30, 2021, NPA for which provision had already been made amounting to Rs 7,786 lakh has been technically written off,” the bank said.

Provision coverage ratio (including technical write off) as of September 30, 2021 is 74.18 per cent, it added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI posts 67% rise in Q2 net to ₹7,627 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Significant improvement in asset quality and lower loan-loss provisions helped State Bank of India  post highest-ever quarterly standalone net profit in the second quarter at ₹ 7,627 crore.

Resolution of the DHFL account, which allowed the  bank to write-back provisions amounting to ₹4,000 crore, also supported SBI’s bottomline.

The net profit in the second  quarter  ended September 30, 2021 was 67 per cent up year-on-year (yoy) vis-a-vis year-ago quarter’s ₹4,574 crore.

Slippages down

Slippages were about 52 per cent lower yoy at ₹4,176 crore in Q2FY22 against ₹15,666 crore in the first quarter (Q1FY22) ended June 30, 2021.

Dinesh Kumar Khara, Chairman, emphasised that the bank could pull back the first quarter’s retail segment slippages.

“This is the reason for the much lower slippages and also the accounts are performing well.

“Also, our ground level forces have also improved collections. Our collection efficiency stands at about 95 per cent,” he said.

The net interest income  was up about 11 per cent yoy to ₹31,184 crore (₹28,181.50 crore in the year-ago quarter).

Other income, including profit/loss on sale of assets, profit/loss on revaluation of investments (net), earnings from foreign exchange and derivative transactions, recoveries from accounts previously written off, dividend income, etc., declined about 4 per cent yoy to ₹8,208 crore (₹8,528 crore).

Loan-loss provisions declined 52 per cent yoy to ₹2,699 crore against ₹5,619 crore.

GNPA position improves

GNPA position improved to 4.90 per cent of gross advances as at September-end 2021 against 5.32 per cent in the preceding quarter.

Net NPAs position too improved to 1.52 per cent of net advances against 1.77 per cent in the preceding quarter.

As at September-end 2021,domestic advances increased about 5 per cent yoy to ₹ 21,56,055 crore. Foreign offices advances were up about 16 per cent yoy to ₹3,74,722 crore.

Within domestic advances, retail personal advances saw a 15 per cent yoy growth; agriculture (about 2 per cent) and SME (about 1 per cent). However, corporate advances de-grew about 4 per cent.

Khara attributed the muted scenario in corporate advances to working-capital limit utilisation continuing to be low.

“However, credit demand appears to be on the rise with increasing economic activities across India. Corporates too have started planning for future investments, which will create demand for credit going forward,” he said, adding that SBI will see an overall credit growth of 9-10 per cent in FY22.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI net profit up 67% in Q2, chairman says asset quality significantly improved, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The State Bank of India, India’s largest lender, today reported a standalone net profit of Rs 7,626 crore, up 67% on year, the highest ever for the bank.

A year ago, the bank reported a net profit of Rs 4,574 crore. On a sequential basis, the profit rose 17% from Rs 6,504 crore in the June quarter.

The bank’s asset quality has significantly improved, chairman Dinesh Khara said at the earnings announcement.

Gross non performing assets came in at 4.90% in the September quarter, lower than 5.32% in the June quarter and 5.28% in the year ago quarter.

Meanwhile, the net NPA ratio stood at 1.52% for the quarter.

The net interest income (NII) – the difference between interest earned and expended – rose 10.6% to Rs 31,184 crore in Jul-Sep.

The non interest income fell 3.7% to Rs 8,207 crore compared with Rs 8,527 crore a year ago.

Khara highlighted that the capacity utilisation of manufacturing is still very low. Advances rose by just 6.17% over last year, driven by personal retail advances, up 15.17% on year, and foreign office advances, up 16.18% on year.

Domestic advances grew 4.61%, with home loans, which constitute 24% of domestic advances, rising 10.74% on year.

Total deposits grew nearly 10% on year, current account deposits grew 19.2% and saving bank deposits grew 10.55%.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of India standalone net profit almost doubles to ₹1,051 cr in Q2

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank of India’s standalone net profit almost doubled to ₹1,051 crore in the second quarter against ₹526 crore in the year ago period on the back of robust growth in other income and a steep decline in loan loss provisions.

During the reporting quarter, there was a reduction in gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) aggregating ₹5,771.50 crore.

NPA position of Indian Banks indicates gradual improvement: CARE Ratings

The Mumbai-headquartered public sector bank’s net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) declined 14 per cent year-on-year (yoy) to ₹3,523 crore (₹4,113 crore in the year ago quarter).

Other income, including profit/loss on sale of assets, profit/loss on revaluation of investments (net), earnings from foreign exchange and derivative transactions, recoveries from accounts previously written off, dividend income, etc., jumped 59 per cent yoy to ₹2,136 crore (₹1,346 crore).

To ease lending, FinMin moves to boost bankers’ morale, growth

GNPA position improved to 12 per cent of gross advances as at September-end 2021 against 13.51 per cent in the preceding quarter.

NPA position

Net NPAs position too improved to 2.79 per cent of net advances against 3.35 per cent in the preceding quarter.

Total deposits edged up by about one per cent yoy to ₹6,12,961 crore. Total advances were up about 5 per cent yoy to ₹3,78,727 crore.

On a consolidated basis, including the results of four domestic subsidiaries, four overseas subsidiaries, one joint venture and six associates, BoI reported a 97 per cent jump in net profit at ₹1,073 crore (₹543 crore).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 18