NARCL will empower lenders, but recovery from 26 accounts is not easy, industry says, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) will kill all communication gaps that bank consortiums face, and will speed up the process. But chances are high that the NARCL will face a tough time recovering from the 26 accounts that have been identified.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday said that the government has allocated more than Rs. 30,600 crore to the NARCL. The government will transfer the funds to the bad bank, according to their calendar. The Cabinet has approved to set up the NARCL, backed by the government securities, she added.

Read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore on securities receipts

NARCL – sole decision maker

Industry veterans believe that NARCL will strengthen the recovery process.

“The first and foremost advantage is that the NARCL will provide consolidation of the debt. The debt, which is spread out in 10-20 different entities of the consortium or the multiple banking arrangement, will be consolidated into one entity, providing ease of resolution. In a multiple banking arrangement, there is always a difference of opinion, which makes it difficult to reach a resolution plan,” said Sunil Mehta, chief executive officer at Indian Banks’ Association.

The biggest benefit banks will have is that they will get 15% funds upfront from the NARCL as soon as they transfer the assets. In the current scenario, it takes months for bankers to get their first cheque after a rigorous process either at the National Company Law Tribunal or at Debt Recovery Tribunals.

Read: What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?

“The intention and the idea behind bad banks is that all the bad loans of the banks are concentrated at one place so there will be one common decision making entity. This will make the execution of asset resolution far faster,” said Jyoti Prakash Gadia, managing director at Resurgent India.

NARCL will empower lenders, but recovery from 26 accounts is not easy, industry says
Operations and recovery

Public sector banks will hold 51% stake in the NARCL, while debt management and other financial institutions will hold 49%. NARCL will be managed by professionals, and non performing asset accounts, which are larger than Rs. 500 crore, will be transferred to it. Currently, banks have identified 26 accounts, worth around Rs. 90,000 crore, which the NARCL will take over from them.

The hope is that the government-backed bad bank will bring in the right value for the banks. Because in the current situation, liquidation is much higher compared with resolution, and lenders have taken more than 90% haircuts in many accounts, including Videocon Industries, Siva Industries etc.

But while NARCL will reduce the gaps and speed up the recovery, experts have their own doubts on its recovery ratio, considering the quality of 26 assets, which will be transferred.

“I am not sure if NARCL will be able to fully recover all the accounts mentioned in the list. However, it is still better than individual recovery,” said Gadia.

Recovery has always been a challenge for lenders. RBI Governor Shakikanta Das had recently highlighted that the total recovery from Lokadalat is 5%, from DRT is 6% and from SARFAESI is 20%. The highest recovery was from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which was 30-45% in earlier days, is now reduced to 5% amid the pandemic, Das said.

Hence, despite having an NARCL, the industry is not hoping for a significant recovery. “The major challenge is that assets mentioned in the list are not very lucrative and buyers will also offer the cheapest rate,” said an industry expert, who did not wish to be quoted.

Siby Antony, former MD and CEO of Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction and a veteran in the sector, believes that ARCs will be better at reviving assets, but is not very sure whether the NARCL will recover.

“I am not hopeful. Because these (the 26 accounts) are bad assets, and finally all will go under liquidation,” Antony said.

Watch: Bad bank can only be a warehouse of bad assets, says Siby Antony



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Restored normalcy in PSU banks hamstrung by sticky bad assets: Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


She said there are lot of changes happening in the banking sector at a fast pace through digitisation. (File)

Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday said the government was able to bring back normalcy with regards to mounting non-performing assets (NPAs) in most of the public sector banks that have been a cause of concern since 2014.

The Centre, apart from infusing required capital, monitored  the PSU banks with regular assessment and reviews while taking prompt corrective actions.

Inaugurating the centenary celebrations of Tamilnad Mercantile Bank (TMB) at Tuticorin, Sitharaman said the problems in banking sector are major problems that concern the entire country which also made everyone feel concerned about the sector.

“Post 2014, we had witnessed major NPA problems in the PSU banks, it took five to six years to reverse the trend and bring back normalcy in most of the banks. While the banks spent energy in the recovery process, even as trying to grow their businesses,” she said.

While speaking on bringing about the efficiency in the banking system, she said the way forward for any bank was to adopt complete technology-enabled solutions.

“Today financial technology is the biggest area and using that we could cross-populate data into forms. Auto-populating data of a consumer has been very useful and it can be done only through digitisation and the management of TMB should think of greater use of digitisation. Digitisation cannot be avoided for your own good and for the sake of customers,” she said.

She said there are lot of changes happening in the banking sector at a fast pace through digitisation. “There is no necessity to open a branch in a place which does not have a  bank. To reach a customer’s bank account of the people who live there, all kind of technologies are available today. Even sitting from Tuticorin one can serve the banking requirements of people living in small villages through technology”, she said.

Sitharaman said even during Covid-19 pandemic with the use of digitisation through banking correspondents, the government’s financial disbursements were distributed to the needy after verifying their details.

“Prime Minister Narendra Modi was clearly aware that banking is important and did not hesitate that there can be zero balance accounts if they were opened under the Jandhan Yojana scheme, launched in 2014. He ensured that every one must hold a bank account and be able to transact,” she said.

K V Rama Moorthy, MD & CEO, TMB, said, “To help borrowers to overcome the adverse impact of Covid-19, till date, the bank has covered 13,753 beneficiaries and the exposure to the tune of Rs 1,567.62 crore. In the era of digital banking, we were the first bank to introduce robotics in currency chest to sort and bundling of currencies in order to provide quality service to the customers. Disbursement of loans to pharma and health care units will be at the heart of a year- long series of events and initiatives from us.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dinesh Khara, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Economic activity started to come back after the second week of June with more vaccinations and opening up of India, says Dinesh Khara, Chairman, SBI. He is of the opinion that inflation is transient in nature due to supply side constraints. Edited excerpts.

Now, that the second wave is almost over– what is your assessment, how large, how deep has been the impact of the second wave on the economy?
My sense is that post second week of June onwards, we are certainly seeing the economic activity coming back, but yes, of course, from middle of April till mid of June things were pretty bad. I would say that the silver lining is that from 16th onwards, things have started looking up and we have seen the situation where unlock has started happening and also the vaccination numbers have started going up. So, that is slowly helping in people to regain the confidence and the economy to recover back. To that extent, it is certainly a very welcome situation.

Has the economic activity gone back to March 2021, not March 2020, I am talking about the time when the first wave had finished and the second wave had not started which is May and April 2021?
In certain areas, yes, but may not be in all areas, for instance, when it comes to the commodity sector, certainly it is moving and there we are very much near to what it was in March 2021 or may be from January to March 2021. When it comes to the consumer demand it is inching towards that, not yet at that level but yes, of course, it is inching. I would say that every subsequent day when the vaccine numbers are improving the confidence is going up. We are inching towards that kind of a normalcy.

In terms of the impact of the second wave, what was the preparedness of SBI?
Well, there was a huge difference particularly during the period of the first wave, it was more like a whole lot of uncertainty which people were grappling with. Well, of course, when the second wave came, it is also attributed to the fact that some of the citizens had lowered their guards and probably partly because of the Covid fatigue also- they were not taking all the precautions, but the redeeming feature is that the vaccine is available during the second wave and people have started getting vaccinated. So, I would say that though the intensity of the second wave was very high but the only thing is that as the vaccine is available and it is now being done at a much faster pace to that extent it has helped people to recover as far as their fear psychosis is concerned.

Are you now concerned about inflation, for the moment we can use the word supply side constraints, but with commodity prices coming back and demand also normalising, could inflation be a real concern?
To my mind, inflation is essentially on account of the supply side factors which is partly attributed to the imbalance in the supply chain side of the corporates. So, I think with the unlock happening, the supply chain imbalance will get addressed and perhaps it will address the supply side challenges also which will certainly help in reducing the inflation. That is how I look at it.

Now, everyone is curious to understand the real impact on NPAs for SBI because of the second wave. First wave moratorium was there but this time around at least on the retail side there is no moratorium. What is your understanding on how this second wave could have impact on NPAs?
Well, of course, some kind of a temporary disruptions were there because the cash flows for the SMEs were certainly affected. But, I would say that the timely announcement of the resolution framework by the RBI, by coming out with the resolution framework for up to 50 crore worth of exposure for SME that has come very handy and it has helped in extending the repayment period and giving the required relief to the SME sector. As far as the housing loans were concerned, there also people are in a position to avail the resolution framework and also have the relief. So, I would say that moratorium may not be there but yes, of course, relief was extended by RBI for resolution, so that has come very handy.

Where do you see credit growth will settle because historically, you have always managed to grow at a credit growth rate which is about a percent, percent-and-a-half higher than the industry?
I would get guided by the projections given by RBI which are indicating some kind of a 7.9% kind of growth and we have generally seen in the past that we have been growing at least 1% over and above what the RBI expect the GDP to grow or maybe for that matter the actual growth of the GDP in the economy. So, if at all the economy grows at about 8%, we expect to grow our loan book at about 9%.

So, when do you see growth coming back both for term loans and for working capital because they are important components to understand which end of the economy is picking up?
I think it would be universally distributed.

What about the retail end of the business? SBI has a very large retail book, given that the number of people affected in the second wave was very large, do you think that end of the business could slow down significantly?
If at all the early indications which I have about the first quarter, it may not be probably as strong for the retail as it was in the last quarter of the previous financial year. So, that is partly attributed to the fact that there was whole lot of challenges of health and hygiene for people and naturally at that point of time, they might not have thought in terms of scaling up their demand for the retail. Going forward, once the economy comes back and once the jobs also restored, perhaps a shortfall which was there in the first quarter would be made up this.

Can I say that for the moment SBI is not worried about delinquencies in the retail book?
Whatever little stress we are seeing, that should be possible for us to pull back because we have seen— for out of 90 days about 60 days was the time when there was no mobility for people, so reaching out to the borrowers was always a challenge. So, I think after 16th of June the mobility has improved and our pace of pulling back any such assets has also improved significantly. As of now, it does not look to be as much of a challenge.

SBI NPAs or NPA cycle is at a five-year low. Can I also say that the second wave is unlikely to change the trajectory because the trajectory has been declining, will the trajectory go slightly off the mark because of the second wave?
As I invariably say, that as far as SBI is concerned, it is proxy to the Indian economy and the shape of Indian economy, the health of Indian economy eventually shows up in the book also. But we do have the capability to manage the book to some extent and that I think we will be ensuring, we will continue to do our bit in terms of ensuring that the asset quality is maintained to be the best in the given situations and circumstances.

In the last three, four years SBI has really unlocked their subsidiaries, it was SBI Life, then last it was SBI Cards. In FY22 will SBI MF go public?
No, it is a joint venture between a French partner Amundi. We are in touch with them and we have to have a unanimous decision on this subject and once we will come to a stage where we would be in a position to announce, we would be more than happy to share that with all of you.

Paytm is planning to go public and their valuations could be anywhere between 20 to 22 billion dollars. Are you somewhere tempted to take Yono public?
I believe that even if we go for any kind of an IPO or any kind of a listing, my objective would be that since the entity would have the SBI names attached to it, the stakeholders should have long term value coming out of it. So, I think temptation is certainly not there and our intention is always to create value for our stakeholders.

SBI has managed to in a sense stand apart in the Covid environment where a lot of banks were struggling with technology, you have managed to keep your technology backbone very solid. That is very impressive, how did you achieve it?
I would attribute it to the urge of the team to achieve the excellence and I think this is something which is more like a value nurtured into the cadre over the years, so eventually that shows up into this kind of a performance.

Would SBI Cards be open to any inorganic acquisition because the Citi Wealth Management and the credit card business is on the block, would you be interested in buying that?
I think when it comes to the question of acquisition, the pricing always matters, so all such decisions have to weigh the pricing and also the opportunity. This will be the guiding factor for any such decision.

There are two interesting trends we spoke about fintech and the other one is consolidation in the PSU banking space, what are your thoughts on both? Fintech is disruptive and the way PSU banking industry is consolidating also could be disruptive and very favourable for large players?In fact, fintechs are as of now operating in a very niche segment, so they are not into a full scale banking operation. To that extent, I would say that it offers an opportunity for the full scale bank like us to collaborate. We are quite open and we are very happy to look at their ideas and incorporate their thoughts and we value whatever incremental value creation they are doing by virtue of having a focus on the customer experience and also a focus leveraging analytics etc. We are happy to incorporate all those into our system and wherever required we are quite happy to collaborate with these fintechs also.

Yes, consolidation is happening and perhaps if I really look at it we continue to have a deposit market share which is around 23% and our loan book market share is somewhere around 20% plus. So, that way I think we feel that we are quite well placed. But having said that, we are quite cognisant of the opportunities which are available and we would like to scale up our market share even further by leveraging technology, analytics and by collaborating with the fintechs.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Fresh NPAs may see a spike, but overall bad loans may decline to 7.1% in FY22, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Notwithstanding the Reserve Bank of India projections of gross non-performing assets rising to 9.8% of total loans this fiscal, the bad loans may decline to at least 7.1 percent by March 2022, as against 7.6 percent at FY21-end.

The NPAs will go lower on higher recoveries and upgrades, and also faster credit growth, ratings agency Icra said, adding that the fresh accretion to the NPAs will be higher in FY22 due to the absence of any regulatory dispensations like moratoriums.

The GNPAs and NNPAs (net NPAs) are expected to decline to 6.9-7.1 percent and 1.9-2.0 percent respectively by March 31, 2022, it said.

What RBI said

The Reserve Bank’s financial stability report had said the GNPAs at March 2021 had come at 7.6 percent and estimated it to rise to 9.8 percent in FY22-end under its base-case assumptions. RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das had said the dent on balance sheets and performance of financial institutions in India has been much less than projected earlier, but a clearer picture will emerge as the effects of regulatory reliefs fully work their way through.

The new math

The rating agency said the fresh NPA generation declined to Rs 2.6 lakh crore or 2.7 percent of advances in FY21 compared to Rs 3.7 lakh crore or 4.2 percent in FY20 and added that the same will be higher in FY22. The headline asset quality numbers of banks do not reflect the underlying stress on the income and cash-flows of the borrowers impacted because of COVID-19 and various regulatory and policy measures such as the moratorium on loan repayment, standstill on asset classification and liquidity extended to borrowers under Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) had a positive impact on the reported asset quality of lenders.

In the absence of standstill on asset classification, we expect the fresh NPAs generation to be higher, however, we also expect the recoveries and upgrades to improve in FY22, it said, adding that the first half of the ongoing fiscal can see higher accretions due to the second wave of the pandemic. The credit provisions for the banks moderated to 2.5 percent of advances in FY21 compared to 3.7 percent in FY20, even as the core operating profits improved with the cost curtailment measures.

PSB turnaround

Within the sector, the turnaround was remarkable for public sector banks, which reported profits after five consecutive years of losses and with NNPAs at the lowest levels seen over the last six years (3.1 percent as of March 31, 2021), ICRA expects the public sector banks (PSB) to remain profitable going forward. After the capital raising exercises, the improved capital positions coupled with lower NNPAs mean a better solvency profile as well as an improved outlook on the ability to support growth and better future profitability.

“We believe that the banks are relatively better placed to handle the stress from the second wave and hence we continue to maintain a stable outlook on the sector.” the rating agency said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Central authority needed to vet write-off, compromise proposals: AIBEA

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has called for the setting up of a Central authority, comprising retired bankers with credit knowledge and integrity, under the auspices of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to vet the proposals for write-off and compromise.

The authorities or the Committees that have sanctioned loans must not have the powers to write-off the same, according to CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA. “The (public sector) banks are bleeding because of the problem of bad loans and huge write-offs and provisioning are being made year after year from out of the operating profits,” he said.

Also read: Delay in insolvency resolution continues to be cause for concern

As per the Association, in 2019, bad loan write-offs by banks amounted to ₹1,83,391 crore and the amount transferred from operating profits as provisions for bad loans/ NPAs (Non-Performing Assets) was at ₹2,29,852 crore.

‘Compromise’ proposals

Venkatachalam emphasised that all write-off proposals beyond a particular limit should be disposed off by the Central Authority constituted specifically for the purpose. Further, “compromise” proposals should be screened at the highest levels. He alleged that going by present day experience, these so-called “compromise proposals” are nothing but camouflage and cover-up of collusive acts.

“Willful bank loan default should be treated as a criminal offence… personal guarantees/ assets of the borrowers including directors of the corporate sector should be attachable for recovery of bank loan dues as has been held by the Supreme Court of India,” Venkatachalam said.

In a representation to the RBI’s committee on the functioning of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs), AIBEA said, “Looking to ARCs’ track record, recovery performance, and the loss borne by the banks on bad debts handled by ARCs, we are very clear that ARCs are not required but stringent laws should be enacted to recover all willful defaults at a relatively quick-time.”

Also read: Private sector banks increased share in deposits, credit at the cost of PSBs in FY21:

The Association suggested that banks should be banned from lending to a company or group of companies, which defaulted and whose account has become a NPA in a particular bank. “The loans of such groups in other banks should also be treated as NPA and should be recalled by the banks. This, we feel, would enable speedy recovery of willfully defaulted corporate loans,” Venkatachalam said.

‘No participation’

The company or group of companies should not also be allowed to participate in the auction for purchase of assets of other defaulting company or group of companies that are brought through SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002) or ARCs.

The Association said in case of ARCs, as far as the Public Sector Banks are concerned, the amount of discount with which a bad loan is sold, the discounted amount should be replenished by the government of India as they are the primary owners of these banks.

Also read: Bank credit growth declines to 5.6 per cent in March

“The present system of sharing recovery on water-fall structure has to change. At present, ARC recovers first its legal and resolution expenses and then management fees and thereafter the recovery is shared in the agreed ratios. This needs to be changed to proportionate sharing of all the items so as to keep the ARC driving recovery,” Venkatachalam said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Seven steps to reignite India’s growth, according to RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The second Covid wave has put the brakes on the economy, but the nation is on the “cusp” of strong growth if the government’s capital expenditure combines with companies’ investment cycle, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said.

The prospects for the economy though impacted by the second wave remain resilient backed by prospects of another bumper rabi crop, gathering momentum of activity in several sectors, especially housing and road construction, and services activity in construction, freight transportation and information technology, the central bank said in its annual report.

Here are seven ways that put India on the growth path again, according to the central bank.

Public and private investment

“A virtuous combination of public and private investment can ignite a shift towards investment and thereby to a trajectory of sustained growth. Fiscal policy, with the largest capex budget ever and emphasis on doing business better, has swung into a crowding-in role. It is apposite now for Indian industry to pick up the gauntlet.’’

Easy monetary policy

RBI will persist with easy monetary policy during the year to ensure that growth gains traction. The conduct of monetary policy in 2021-22 would be guided by evolving macroeconomic conditions, with a bias to remain supportive of growth till it gains traction on a durable basis,” said the report. The central bank will ensure that system-level liquidity remains comfortable during 2021-22 in alignment with the stance of monetary policy, and monetary transmission continues unimpeded while maintaining financial stability,” according to the annual report 2020-21.

Recovery of private demand

“The recovery of the economy from Covid-19 will critically depend on the robust revival of private demand that may be led by consumption in short-run but will require acceleration of investment to sustain the recovery,” said the report. For a self-sustaining GDP growth trajectory post-COVID-19, a durable revival in private consumption and investment demand together would be critical as they account for around 85 per cent of GDP. Typically, post-crisis recoveries are led more by consumption than investment, it said.

Limiting costs to Q1

The macroeconomic costs of this wave can be limited to Q1 with possible spillovers into July, RBI said, adding that that is the most optimistic scenario that can be envisaged at this juncture.”

Rekindling animal spirits

Private investment is the missing piece in the story of the Indian economy in 2020-21; reviving it awaits an environment in which “animal spirits” are rekindled and entrepreneurial energies are released so that backward and forward linkages and multipliers prepare the ground for a durable investment-driven recovery

Monitor asset quality

Stress tests indicate that Indian banks have sufficient capital at the aggregate level even in a severe stress scenario. Bank-wise as well as system-wide supervisory stress testing provide clues for a forward-looking identification of vulnerable areas,” RBI said. Banks should keep a tab on the Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and accordingly earmark capital for provisioning, according to the central bank.

Unleashing services demand

The services sector is still “wounded,” but the focus of government spending on infrastructure could unleash pent-up demand in the economy and create a sufficient climate for all-round development, it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Gross NPAs of banks likely to decline in FY21 amid MSME schemes, restructuring, write-offs: CARE Ratings

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The year-on-year gross bank credit growth to MSEs in March had declined to its lowest level, amid the second Covid wave, since May in the financial year 2020-21.

Gross non-performing assets of banks are likely to decline in FY21 due to restructuring, write-offs, and resilience in the economy, rating agency CARE Ratings said on Wednesday. The decline is expected as several regulatory and government support schemes for MSMEs and others had helped borrowers to access liquidity and conserve cash flows. For instance, the moratorium on loan repayments for six months till August 30, 2020, Covid-related restructuring scheme for MSMEs till March 31, 2021, and for large corporates till December 31, 2020, Resolution Framework 2.0 scheme for personal loans and MSMEs till September 30, 2021, ECLGS to enable banks and NBFCs provide funding to MSMEs, TLTROs, special refinance facilities to NABARD/SIDBI/NHB to address sectoral credit needs, and extended partial guarantee scheme, the agency noted.

“The government had enabled loan of up to 20 per cent of an MSME’s total outstanding credit in the Rs 3 lakh crore ECLGS scheme. So, loans were guaranteed by the government and MSMEs got significant breathing space with immediate cash flows being taken care of so that they may not default and deteriorate their credit score, etc. Given that MSMEs generally have a significant share of NPAs, now that share will be much more muted than what we would have expected otherwise,” Sanjay Agarwal, Senior Director, CARE Ratings told Financial Express Online.

Gross NPAs had jumped by 43.7 per cent from Rs 7.1 lakh crore in March 2017 to reach Rs 10.2 lakh crore by the end of March 2018 following which the NPAs witnessed moderation and reached Rs 8.9 lakh crore by end of March 2020, the report said. The asset quality pressure witnessed by the banks over post asset quality review (AQR) had been reducing in a couple of years prior to Covid. The movement in gross NPA had declined to Rs 9 lakh crore in FY19 and to Rs 8.9 lakh crore in FY20.

Subscribe to Financial Express SME newsletter now: Your weekly dose of news, views, and updates from the world of micro, small, and medium enterprises

Despite a challenging year (FY21), the quantum of gross NPAs of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) is expected to decline by the end of March 2021 as compared with the previous year due to write-offs, lower slippage, restructuring schemes, and ECLGS support for MSMEs, the agency said in the report. However, as anticipated with the Supreme Court judgment allowing for the recognition of NPAs, FY21-end numbers are expected to be either similar or slightly above the Q3 FY21 numbers, it added. “Slippages are largely from MSMEs in retail. MSME slippages have been reduced because of the ECLGS,” added Agarwal.

The FY21 gross NPAs is estimated to settle at Rs 7.9 lakh crore, according to CARE Ratings. While public lenders’ gross NPA amount is expected to be around Rs 6.0 lakh crore at the end of March 2021 vis-à-vis Rs 6.8 lakh crore at the end of March 2020, for private lenders, the gross NPA amount increased from Rs 1.8 lakh crore in March 2018 to over Rs 2 lakh crore in December 2019. However, it is subsequently expected to have retreated to around Rs 1.96 lakh crore by the end of March 2021.

Moreover, write-offs’ share in gross NPAs has markedly increased post FY18, indicating that SCBs have cleaned their books taking a hit and recoveries have had a smaller share of the same, the agency said. “MSMEs right off every quarter by all banks has been very significant because the government had given quite a lot of equity and banks had made a lot of provisions. Now they have written off against the provisions. So it doesn’t reflect in the profit and loss statement but writes-offs are very significant,” said Agarwal.

Importantly, the year-on-year gross bank credit growth to MSEs in March had declined to its lowest level, amid the second Covid wave, since May in the financial year 2020-21. The credit outstanding as of March 26, 2021, was Rs 11.07 lakh crore – up only 2.5 per cent from Rs 10.8 lakh crore in March 2020, according to the RBI’s monthly bulletin. Moreover, the share of MSEs in India’s overall gross bank credit also continued to decline for the third straight month. From 12.11 per cent in December 2020, the MSE share contracted to 12.09 per cent in January 2021 and 11.8 per cent in February before slipping further to 11.3 per cent in March. The overall gross bank credit as of March 26, 2021, stood at Rs 97.2 lakh crore.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Net loss swells to Rs 3,788 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Crisis-hit lender Yes Bank on Friday reported a standalone net loss of Rs 3,788 crore in the March quarter as against a net loss of Rs 3,668 crore in the year-ago period.

In the quarter ended December (Q3 FY21), it had posted a profit of Rs 151 crore. Net interest income in Q4 FY21 declined by 23 per cent to Rs 987 crore as against Rs 1,274 crore in Q4 FY20.

Non-interest income crashed by 32 per cent to Rs 816 crore from Rs 1,197 crore in Q3 FY21 but rose by 37 per cent from Rs 597 crore in the same period.

Thus the total net income shows a marginal decline of 3.6 per cent in Q4 FY21 at Rs 1,803 crore from Rs 1,871 crore in the same period of previous year. However, the dip works out to 52 per cent from Rs 3,758 in Q3 FY21.

Deposits grew by 11 per cent quarter-on-quarter at Rs 1.62 lakh crore and 55 per cent year-on-year with 6.6 lakh CASA accounts (current accounts saving accounts) opened in FY21.

Retail and SME disbursements were at Rs 12,150 crore in Q4 FY21. But provisions rose by 7.5 per cent to Rs 5,240 crore as compared to Rs 4,872 crore in March 2020.

“The bank has demonstrated significant improvement in performance across key indicators despite severe headwinds of Covid-19 and moratorium imposed in Mar 2020,” it said in a statement.

But worryingly, the bank’s gross non-performing assets (NPAs) stand at 15.41 per cent and net NPAs at 5.88 per cent.

On March 5 last year, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had placed the crisis-hit lender under a moratorium and appointed Prashant Kumar as the new CEO and Managing Director.

According to RBI-backed rescue plan, State Bank of India acquired up to 49 per cent stake in Yes Bank. HDFC and ICICI Bank infused Rs 1,000 crore each, Axis Bank Rs 600 crore and Kotak Mahindra Bank Rs 500 crore.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Gold loans: A place to be in, for banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Gold loans stood out in banks’ loan portfolio in the first nine months of the current financial year, both in terms of growth and asset quality.

Banks aggressively expanded their loan against pledge of gold ornaments and jewellery (jewel loans) portfolio in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Gold loans shine as small businesses, borrowers look for ready cash

During the first nine months of FY2021, banks preferred to lend either against highly liquid collateral such as gold or Government guarantee as they feared the economic downturn would affect customers’ ability to repay loans.

State Bank of India’s (SBI) personal gold loan book jumped four times in six months (up to December-end 2020) to stand at ₹17,492 crore.

Mobile app for gold loan launched in Kochi

Gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) of India’s largest bank was only at 0.04 per cent of its gold loan portfolio, per the bank’s analyst presentation. The bank, however, did not disclose the size of its agriculture gold loan in the presentation.

Bank of Baroda’s (BoB) agriculture gold loan portfolio was up 29 per cent year-on-year (yoy) to ₹21,116 crore as at December-end 2020 (₹16,325 crore as at December-end 2019).

“When we look at the agriculture side, nearly 40 per cent of the growth that we see in agriculture has come from gold loans. Gold loans are 20-21 per cent of our total agriculture book.

“…And we do hope that going ahead, 40-50 per cent of agricultural growth will come from gold loans,” Sanjiv Chadha, MD & CEO, BoB, told analysts last month.

Risk-averse market

The gold loan portfolio of Thrissur (Kerala) headquartered CSB Bank jumped about 60 per cent yoy to ₹5,644 crore as at December-end 2020 (₹3,523 crore).

Gold loans accounted for 40 per cent of the private sector bank’s total advances against 30 per cent in the year-ago quarter.

“We will not slow down the gold loan growth. We will increase the growth of the other products so that as a proportion (of total advances), gold loan will go down. I think, this (gold loan portfolio) is only about ₹6,000 crore. There is a big public sector bank, which has ₹70,000 crore of gold loans, so gold loan is a place to be in today,” C VR Rajendran, MD & CEO, CSB Bank, told analysts last month.

Federal Bank’s gold loan portfolio registered a y-o-y growth of 67 per cent and crossed ₹14,000 crore in the third quarter of FY2021, per its third quarter analyst presentation.

The proportion of gold loans in total advances in the case of Karur Vysya Bank (KVB) increased to 23 per cent as at December-end 2020 as against 17 per cent as at December-end 2019.

As at December-end 2020, KVB’s gold loan portfolio stood at ₹12,069 crore (₹8,580 crore)

Karthik Srinivasan, Group Head — Financial Sector Ratings, ICRA, observed that gold prices have been going up and this has been providing comfort to both lenders and borrowers.

“The market is still risk-averse. And banks, especially public sector banks, have been offering gold loans at relatively finer rates. So, that is an option that many people are availing,” he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NPAs to be nebulous owing forbearance dispensations, restructuring schemes: CARE

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Non-performing assets (NPAs) of Banks this year would tend to be a bit nebulous due to the various forbearance dispensations that have been given besides the restructuring schemes that have been introduced, according to CARE Ratings.

Banks, however, have been more proactive in terms of being cognizant of the regulatory environment and the fact that there could be an increase in quantum of NPAs once normalcy returns.

“This would affect not just corporate loans but also those pertaining to the SME (small and medium enterprise) segment and retail borrowers,” the credit rating agency said in a note.

Referring to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Gross NPA projection in its latest Financial Stability Report, CARE said even the baseline scenario, which also considers the withdrawal of the regulatory dispensation, is quite high. These stress scenarios will get reflected in a sharp increase in the slippage ratio, it added.

As per the latest (January 2021) FSR, GNPA ratio of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) could rise to 13.5 per cent by September 2021 from 7.5 per cent in September 2020 under the baseline scenario.

Cumulative provisions

Cumulative provisions made by Banks for the year (which includes for NPAs among others) was around Rs 1.78 lakh crore in these three quarters.

Per CARE’s assessment, the picture so far this year has been positive with a tendency for gross NPAs to move down both in terms of amount as well as ratio of outstanding credit.

“There was a contrarian movement in June after which there has been a decline. The decline in NPAs indicates negative slippage ratio — incremental NPAs to outstanding credit at the start of quarter,” the agency said.

GNPAs of 30 Banks rose from 7.94 per cent of gross advances as at March-end 2020 to 8.20 per cent as at June-end 2020. However, GNPAs declined to 7.72 per cent as at September-end 2020 and 7.01 per cent as at December-end 2020.

Referring to RBI’s Report, the agency said it had indicated that as of September 2020, the gross NPA ratio was above 20 per cent for gems and jewellery and construction sectors and above 15 per cent for mining and engineering. For industry it was 12.4 per cent.

“Retail had a ratio of 1.7 per cent which can be an area of concern going ahead. Further, large borrowers had a gross NPA ratio of 11.3 per cent,” it added.

Distribution of GNPAs

As per CARE’s analysis of the third quarter results of 30 Banks, only HDFC Bank had GNPA of less than 1 per cent. Eleven Banks had GNPA in the 1-4 per cent range and 7 banks had GNPAs in the 5-10 per cent range.

Five Banks had GNPAs in the 10-15 per cent range and 2 Banks had GNPAs in the 15-20 per cent range. Only one Bank had GNPA above 20 per cent.

The positive development is that all of them witnessed a decline in the gross NPA ratio during this period, the agency said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3