Avanti Finance completes Series A and debt funding round, raises ₹306 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Technology led NBFC Avanti Finance has further raised $15 million or about ₹111 crore in Series A2 from existing investors Oikocredit, Nomura, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Dr KR Shroff Foundation. With this, it has completed their Series A and debt funding round, which raised a total of $41 million or ₹306 crore.

Also read: Should you subscribe to the Nykaa IPO?

“Avanti will use the funds to strengthen its deep tech platform, bolster data science, enhance its product suite and expand the team to enable unparalleled access to affordable credit and financial empowerment to millions of unserved and underserved households in India,” it said in a statement.

Rahul Gupta, CEO of Avanti said, “The Avanti team is excited and ready to accelerate our mission. We are grateful to our board and investors for reposing their faith in our unique business model to democratise credit to the next 100 million households and make every loan an impact story.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Foreign brokerages not so bullish, market correction in the offing?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Foreign brokerages are downgrading Indian markets for being extremely expensive based on traditional valuation metrics, when compared to peers such as China and Japan in Asia.

The NSE Nifty is up 30 per cent in 2021 so far, while the BSE sensex is up 28 per cent, driven by financials, utilities, industrials and consumer discretionary stocks even as the broader MSCI Asia Pacific ex-Japan index has largely remained flat.

On Monday, Nomura downgraded India’s equity markets to neutral from overweight due to expensive equity valuations.

The Japanese brokerage firm prefers allocating to China and other Asean countries that have underperformed India in 2021. The brokerage feels while the upside is already priced in, headwinds could emerge that will prove to be risky in the future.

Nomura said 77 per cent of domestic stocks in the MSCI index are trading higher than pre-pandemic or post 2018 average valuations.

“We now see an unfavourable risk-reward given valuations, as a number of positives appear to be priced in, whilst headwinds are emerging. We, thus, downgrade India to neutral in our regional allocation and will look for better entry points given our still-constructive medium term view. We like China (significant under-performer seeing stabilising sentiment) and Asean (tactically laggard reopening play),” said equity strategists Chetan Seth and Amit Phillips in a note.

Ironically, in February Nomura had upgraded India to overweight, citing fiscal activism and declining Covid-19 cases.

“However, we think these positives are now adequately reflected in current valuations – that appear rich not only on absolute basis but also on relative basis. Even on two-year forward price-to earnings (PE) basis (incorporating India’s strong earnings outlook), India is trading at record high elevated premium relative to regional markets,” the analysts added.

What are the biggest risks for India?Elevated commodity prices, sticky core inflation and tentative signs of slowdown in demand are among the biggest risks for India.

Analysts at Nomura think if the current trend in prices of natural gas, crude, coal and electricity continue till the end of the calendar year, and increase by around 5 per cent till March 2022, then the potential impact on consumer price inflation (CPI) would be around 1 per cent.

Nomura not the only one

Nomura is not the only one advising clients to cut allocations to India. Last week, brokerage UBS echoed similar views and said India has become “unattractive” due to “extremely expensive” valuations when compared to the Asean countries.

The brokerage also said that earnings momentum is fading in India and there is less scope for an economic rebound this year, even as domestic stocks have outperformed markets like Indonesia by 31 per cent year-to-date.

Low real yield and expensive currency suggest some vulnerability for India in the tapering environment.

“India, like Taiwan, looks very poor on our scorecard framework. The relative valuation of India to Asean, two areas with similar growth dynamics and occasional perceived macro vulnerabilities, looks too wide to justify,” it said.

A Bank of America survey that was released last week showed global fund houses are underweight on emerging markets and want to cut exposure in the next 12 months, citing inflationary risks.

Global fund managers’ allocation in October to emerging market equities fell to the lowest level since September 2018, while allocation to US equities increased to the largest since November 2020.

In a newsletter titled Greed & Fear, Christopher Wood, the global head of equity strategy at Jefferies, has said India’s overweight position looks ‘vulnerable’.

What is triggering the market correction?

Rising fuel prices, inflation and high valuations are now triggering a correction in the market after months of record rallying.

While the sensex is down 1 per cent in the last five days, slipping below the 61,000-mark, the Nifty also slipped below 18,000 as experts are starting to caution investors because of stretched valuations and the impact of inflation on corporate earnings.

The BSE sensex last touched an all time high of 62,245 on October 19, but since then it has declined by 2 per cent.

More such calls for reduction of allocation to India is likely to result in further outflow of funds and a deeper correction in the markets.

Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have already turned net sellers by pulling out Rs 3,825 crore in October so far. FPIs had been net buyers for two consecutive months and had invested Rs 26,517 crore in September and Rs 16,459 crore in August.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bankers hopeful of a revival in corporate loan growth as economy opens up, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank credit to industry remains muted, falling 1.7% in the year to date, with companies slashing debt and harnessing existing capacities in a demand environment made uncertain by the pandemic. But bankers expect a revival in corporate loan growth as the economy opens up, making a strong business case for capital expenditure.

Chunky industrial loans, which make up about 30% of non-food credit, have witnessed lukewarm demand so far in 2021, latest central bank data showed, underscoring a trend among companies to conserve cash, deleverage as much as possible, and leave under-utilised the respective loan limits sanctioned by lenders. Retail credit demand has expanded, however, through the period of episodic lockdowns and curbs on mobility.

Both analysts and bankers believe credit demand will now pick up as companies invest for the next cycle of growth. In a report published earlier this month, Japanese investment bank Nomura said growing optimism and abundant liquidity should boost loan demand.

“Banks expect an across-the-board improvement in demand through Q1 2022, with optimism levels the highest for retail loans, followed by manufacturing and services, while infrastructure loan demand lags,” Nomura said. “The simultaneous rise in loan demand and easing of loan supply conditions suggest that credit growth should eventually pick up.”

An uncertain business environment led to muted credit demand from traditionally asset-heavy industries, such as industrial metals, metal products, iron and steel, construction and cement. Instead of adding more debt to their balance sheets, several companies in these sectors sought to deleverage, harnessing cash flows to improve their debt profiles.

Incidentally, better profiles should now encourage many companies to add debt as expansion capital.

“We believe India Inc, after undergoing a phase of deleveraging over the past few years, is now better positioned … (for) re-leveraging. Indian financiers, too, have saddled themselves with ample liquidity or capital buffers to tap the emerging opportunity,” ICICI Securities said in a note. “Recovery in economic activity and the derivative effect of increased investments and corporate/government spending on consumption will sustain the momentum of 15%-plus growth over FY22-FY25.”

To be sure, cheaper rates in the local and overseas bond markets meant that companies looked to those sources for their short- and medium-term funding needs instead of banks.

Bankers believe that as companies embark on large projects, loan demand will rebound. For instance, Bank of Baroda reported a year-on-year fall of 10% in corporate loans as it shed low-yielding advances in the first quarter. But CEO Sanjiv Chadha said he expects loan growth to pick up this year, helping the bank expand its loan book by 7% to 10%. That would include a 5% to 7% expansion in corporate loans.

“Retail loans will still grow faster than corporate loans but we are seeing an uptick in demand from road projects, city gas projects and renewable energy projects, which will help the demand for loans,” Chadha said during the bank’s first-quarter earnings call.

Retail loans have expanded 12% on-year, helped by a low base and paced by demand for homes and vehicles. Credit card spending fell.

Home loans expanded 10% and vehicle loans 11% despite the lockdowns through April and May. But outstanding credit card loans fell 12% year-on-year as consumer sentiment was hit by localised lockdowns.

State Bank of India (SBI), which reported a 2.3% fall in corporate loans, also expects the situation to improve this fiscal. Chairman Dinesh Khara said he expects demand from companies to improve, boosting its loan margins, as both individual and industrial borrowers add more loans.

To be sure, demand from industry is crucial to prop up overall credit growth.

“We believe industry growth will have to emerge as a key driver to boost credit growth in coming years. While it may happen with some lag, revival in consumer demand and rise in government spending can be the potential triggers,” ICICI Securities said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Analysts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank may be hitting the end of its tolerance for high inflation and will most likely hike interest rates in the first half of 2022, analysts said on Friday.

The central bank will also start rolling back its accommodative policies which have led to easy liquidity conditions, they said.

The view from analysts came even as inflation cooled down to 5.6 per cent for July, after two months of breaching the upper end of the RBI‘s tolerance band of 6 per cent.

The central bank has been keeping the status quo on policy and continuing with the accommodative stance to help revive GDP growth.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had on Thursday opined that the current conditions do not warrant withdrawal of the accommodative measures.

“The RBI has been tolerant of inflation and has stayed accommodative to support growth given the deep hit suffered by the economy. But it appears to be reaching the end of tether as inflation remains elevated,” rating agency Crisil said.

“If this pressure (on inflation) continues and systemically important central banks, especially the (US) Fed, begin normalising, the RBI will start to roll back accommodation. We expect the RBI to make a more definitive statement by this fiscal end, and raise rates by 0.25 per cent,” it added.

Its peer Acuite said it expects policy normalisation to begin in a gradual fashion with comfort on vaccination, clarity on fiscal stance, and global rates setting and called the increase in the quantum of variable reverse repo auctions as the first small step towards the same objective.

Next, the central bank can look at increasing the reverse repo rate by 0.40 per cent to narrow the difference between repo and reverse repo rate to 0.25 per cent by February 2022, it said, adding that the repo will be unchanged at 4 per cent.

In parallel, the vaccination drive is expected to lead to herd immunity and thereafter, the RBI will follow up with a 0.25 per cent rate hike in April 2022, it said.

Analysts at Japanese brokerage Nomura said last week’s review had signs of RBI policy pivoting towards normalization, pointing out to one of the members of the monetary policy committee also dissented against the “accommodative stance” and the increase in FY22 headline inflation target to 5.7 per cent.

“The August policy meeting already bore initial signs of a policy pivot via calibrated liquidity normalisation. We believe this will be followed by the phasing out of durable injectors of liquidity, a 0.40 per cent reverse repo rate hike (in December quarter) and 0.75 per cent of repo/reverse repo rate hikes in 2022,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBL, Yes Bank, Bajaj Finserv most impacted by RBI curbs on Mastercard, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, After the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) restricted Mastercard from on-boarding new customers, among the credit card issuers, including co-brand partners, RBL Bank, Yes Bank and Bajaj Finserv are the most impacted as their entire card schemes are allied with Mastercard.

Japanese brokerage Nomura said in a note that these three entities are the most impacted by the RBI move.

HDFC Bank has 60 per cent of its card schemes tied to Mastercard, Amex and Diners, while for Axis Bank and ICICI Bank, this is about 35-36 per cent.

“That said, we don’t know the individual card schemes’ contribution to the overall profitability of the issuers to assess the potential impact,” it added.

HDFC Bank is already restricted from issuing new cards, and hence is not incrementally impacted. On the other hand, Kotak’s card portfolio is entirely allied to Visa and hence it won’t face any issues.

The managements of both Axis Bank and ICICI Bank have in the recent past talked about their cobranded cards with Flipkart and Amazon, respectively, to be the fastest-growing card schemes. These card schemes are 14 per cent and 15 per cent of outstanding cards for Axis and ICICI, respectively.

While the Amazon ICICI card is allied to Visa, the Flipkart Axis card is allied to Mastercard, and hence is a potential medium-term risk, should the current status-quo continue, Nomura said.

The RBI on Wednesday restricted Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd from onboarding new customers across all its card products (debit, credit and prepaid) from July 22, 2021.

The RBI had earlier put similar restrictions on both American Express Bank (Amex) and Diners Club International (Discover Financial Services).

“This leaves only Visa Inc and homegrown NPCI’s RuPay as payment providers under no restrictions currently. We don’t know if Visa has fulfilled all the requirements of data localisation as envisaged in the Storage of Payment System Data circular of the RBI,” Nomura said.

“In the near term, we don’t foresee any material impact on card issuers (especially credit card issuers), but there could be a medium-term impact if this situation persists,” it added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Malaysia digital banking lures dozens of firms as fintechs expand in Asia, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Southeast Asian ride-hailing-to-fintech group Grab and budget airline AirAsia were among more than a dozen bidders involving over 50 companies that are vying for digital banking licences in Malaysia, people familiar with the matter said.

Others who submitted bids by Wednesday’s deadline included telecoms operator Axiata and a consortium backed by Chinese tech firm Tencent, said the sources.

They have been drawn in by relatively low financial entry barriers and the promise of a growing army of young smartphone users in a country with a population of more than 32 million.

Malaysia’s move to open up its banking sector comes as Asian markets such as Hong Kong, Singapore and the Philippines are ushering in new players, mostly fintech firms, who are taking on incumbents with their low-cost and newer services.

The Malaysian central bank https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/policy-document-on-licensing-framework-for-digital-banks has said it will issue up to five licences by early 2022.

“Malaysia has many of the characteristics digital banking players are looking for, with a sizeable population, large smartphone penetration and young population eager to try out new services,” said Shankar Kanabiran, financial services consulting partner at EY.

Malaysia requires only 300 million ringgit ($72 million) of capital funds for digital banks, which has drawn interest from fintechs to money remittance companies to co-operatives representing banks and housing sectors.

In contrast, Singapore needed license applicants to have S$1.5 billion ($1.1 billion) in paid-up capital for fully functioning digital banks or S$100 million for digital wholesale banks.

Sources said that most of the applicants for Malaysia’s online-only banks were likely to be local, with only a handful of foreign names such as Southeast Asian internet platform Sea , Grab, and Tencent-backed Linklogis.

Sea, which won a full digital banking licence in Singapore, is partnering with Malaysian conglomerate YTL Corp Bhd , they added.

A joint venture of Grab and Singtel, which also won a full digital banking licence in Singapore, has applied with a consortium of other investors, Singtel said on Thursday.

AirAsia has tied up with a consortium for the application through its fintech unit BigPay, sources said. Axiata has teamed up with RHB Bank.

Sea and BigPay declined to comment while there was no response to a query sent to YTL. The sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to the media.

At a news conference last month, Axiata Digital CEO Khairil Abdullah said that a lack of access to credit for a big chunk of Malaysia’s population had created a “very sizeable underserved segment” for the company to tap into.

Maybank, CIMB Group Holdings and Public Bank Bhd dominate Malaysia’s banking sector.

Nomura analysts said in a June report that the entry of digital banks would intensify competition in segments such as deposit pricing, fees, and later, loan pricing where there might be some overlap with conventional banks.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU fines UBS, Nomura, UniCredit $452 million over bond cartel, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


European Union antitrust regulators fined UBS, UniCredit and Nomura 371 million euros ($452 million) on Thursday in connection with a European government bond trading cartel.

The penalties are the latest to punish the financial industry for alleged involvement in foreign exchange cartels, Euribor and Libor benchmark cartels, and bonds cartels.

The three banks said in statements that they would appeal or were considering doing so.

The European Commission said the European government bond cartel ran from 2007 to 2011, with traders from the banks informing each other on their prices and volumes offered in the run-up to the auctions and the prices being shown to their customers or to the market in general via multilateral chatrooms on Bloomberg terminals.

“A well-functioning European government bonds market is paramount both for the eurozone member states issuing these bonds to generate liquidity and the investors buying and trading them,” European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.

UBS said the fine related to “a legacy issue” and it had since taken action to improve its processes.

“Taking into account relevant provisions, this matter may have an impact of up to $100 million on UBS’s second quarter 2021 results,” it said.

UniCredit said the findings did not show any “wrongdoing on its part”.

“UniCredit will appeal the decision before the European Courts,” the Italian bank said in a statement.

Nomura said it had introduced measures to ensure “the highest levels of integrity at all times” and would consider all options, including an appeal.

“The decision issued today by the European Commission and associated fine imposed on Nomura relates to historic behaviour by two former Nomura employees for an approximate 10 month period in 2011,” it said.

The European Commission said Bank of America, RBS (now known as NatWest), Natixis and WestLB (now known as Portigon) also took part in the cartel.

NatWest escaped a 260-million-euro fine as it alerted the cartel to the EU competition watchdog. Bank of America and Natixis were also not fined because their infringement falls outside the limitation period for imposition of fines, the Commission said.

It said Portigon, the legal and economic successor to WestLB, received a zero fine as it did not generate any net turnover in the last business year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

US Senate Banking chair presses Wall Street banks on Archegos ties, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


WASHINGTON: The Democratic chair of the US Senate Banking Committee has written to several large banks, including Credit Suisse and Japan’s Nomura, asking them for information on their relationship with New York-based Archegos Capital Management after the fund imploded last month.

Senator Sherrod Brown asked the bank’s chiefs to detail how their institutions came to do business with Archegos, a family office run by ex-Tiger Asia manager Bill Hwang. Archegos’ soured leveraged bets on media stocks have left the fund and banks that financed its trades nursing billions of dollars in losses.

In addition to Credit Suisse and Nomura, which lost $4.7 billion and $2 billion, respectively, Brown sent the letters to Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley which did not lose money on the trades, Reuters and other media outlets have reported.

Representatives of banks declined to comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The letters signal that the fallout from the Archegos meltdown is spreading in Washington, where policymakers are already mulling new rules on nonbanks and how traditional banks may be exposed to their risks.

“I am troubled, but not surprised, by the news reports that Archegos entered into risky derivatives transactions facilitated by major investment banks,” Brown wrote in the letters.

“The massive transactions, and losses, raise several questions regarding [the banks’] relationship with Archegos and the treatment of so-called ‘family offices,’ Mr. Hwang’s history, and the transactions.”

Brown pressed for details on how banks do business with “family offices,” lightly regulated funds that manage individuals’ and families’ personal fortunes, the services provided to them by the banks, and how the banks decide on the amount of credit to extend.

He also quizzed the lenders on whether bank supervisors or bank risk committees signed off on their dealings with Archegos, given Hwang had previously been punished by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for alleged insider trading.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

China asks banks to stamp down on loan growth, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


China’s central bank has asked major lenders, including the foreign ones, to curtail loan growth for the rest of this year after a surge in the first two months stoked bubble risks.

At a meeting with the People’s Bank of China, banks were told to keep new advances in 2021 at roughly the same level as last year. Some foreign banks were also urged to rein in additional lending through so-called window guidance recently after ramping up their balance sheets in 2020.

China, which keeps tight control over money flows in and out of the country, may be worried that a surge of funds into the country could lead to nasty surprises like inflation.

“On the one hand, there will be a slowdown in loan growth, and on the other hand, the slowdown is quite moderate,” said Lu Ting, chief China economist at Nomura Holdings Inc., adding that the pace is in line with the PBOC’s stance of making no sharp policy turns.

With the coronavirus largely contained and the economy rebounding, Chinese policymakers have renewed a campaign to curb risks, especially in the financial and real estate sectors. Even if credit growth eases, the prospect of higher interest rates and fewer soured assets may boost the profitability of banks, which saw earnings slump after they were enlisted to help borrowers obtain cheap financing during the pandemic.

Foreign banks

Chinese rules have sharply limited the ability of foreign banks to do business in the country, making them less competitive against local rivals. Rules enacted in December and January restricts how much money foreign banks can transfer into China from overseas. Those enacted last month required many foreign banks to make fewer loans and sell off bonds and other investments.

The new rules have caused a stir among the global bank executives and foreign companies in China that depend on those lenders for money. They worry that the rules could make foreign-owned businesses more dependent on China’s state-run banking system for the money they need to grow. That dependence could give Beijing another potential pressure point to use as it squares off against the US and others over trade, human rights, geopolitics and other sticky issues.

Record credit, inflows

In 2020, banks doled out a record 19.6 trillion yuan ($3 trillion) of credit. Lending the same amount this year would bring the outstanding balance to about 192 trillion yuan.

Foreign investors last year increased their holdings of Chinese bonds by about $150 billion. China also surpassed the US last year by taking in $163 billion worth of direct investments in factories, office buildings, companies and other assets.

China’s currency, the renminbi, rose sharply in value against the U.S. dollar in the second half of last year. In May, $1 was worth about 7.15 renminbi. By year’s end, $1 bought about 6.5 renminbi.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Hedge fund fallout wipes over $9 bn from market value of Credit Suisse, Nomura, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON: Shares in Nomura and Credit Suisse fell further on Wednesday, with a collective $9 billion wiped off their market value so far this week as the banks braced for big losses from the blow-up of US-based hedge fund Archegos Capital.

Credit Suisse and Nomura were slower than rivals to cut their exposure to Archegos, a family office run by former Tiger Asia manager Bill Hwang. Global lenders that acted as brokers for Archegos may have to write down more $6 billion after the fund defaulted on payments, Reuters has reported.

Credit Suisse shares fell 4% on Wednesday, bringing this week’s decline to nearly 20%. Already under pressure from its exposure to failed supply chain finance firm Greensill, Credit Suisse’s plans to buy back shares and pay dividends this year could now be at risk, analysts said.

The bank’s market capitalisation has shrunk by five billion Swiss francs since Friday to 25.57 billion Swiss francs ($27.12 billion). Sources estimate Credit Suisse’s losses may total $5 billion but the bank declined to comment.

UBS analysts said “a lot of unanswered questions” remained, referring to Credit Suisse’s involvement first in Greensill and now the US-based hedge fund.

“Outflows? P&L impact? Insurance coverage? Quality of underlying assets? Litigation? Developments around involved partners? Reputational impact? Impact on strategy?” they wrote.

Meanwhile Nomura which has warned of a $2 billion hit from Archegos, fell a further 2.9% following a 0.8% fall on Japanese stock markets on Wednesday. Its market capitalisation has dropped from 2.3 trillion yen ($20.81 billion) to 1.88 trillion yen since Friday, Refinitiv data shows.

Ratings agencies added to the pressure as Moody’s slashed its outlook on Nomura to “negative”, citing potential deficiencies in its risk management process.

Fitch placed Nomura’s viability ratings on “negative watch” citing the potential for material losses arising from transactions with a US client in one of its US subsidiaries as well as questions over the adequacy of Nomura’s controls.

Meanwhile, in derivatives markets the cost of insuring exposure to Credit Suisse and Nomura rose.

Credit Suisse five-year credit defaults swaps (CDS) were trading at 73 basis points, the highest in a year and up 17 bps from Friday’s close, IHS Markit data showed.

That implies a cost of 73,000 Swiss francs a year to insure exposure to 10 million francs worth of Credit Suisse debt for a five-year period.

Nomura CDS were at 52 bps, versus 41 bps on Friday.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2